- Reason
- This is a high EV image
- Articles this image appears in
-
333 Wacker Drive
Wacker Drive
America's Favorite Architecture - Creator
- The Seventh Taylor
- Support as nominator -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 01:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Very poor quality and small image size, not centered in frame, and highly reproduceable. EV is not high enough to accept those flaws. — raeky ( talk | edits) 01:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Raeky. Also, a more oblique angle would be desirable.
Jujutacular
T ·
C 02:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- This could obviously be cropped to be symmetric. What type of angle are your suggesting however?--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 03:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- An angle that is not so head-on to the face of the building. Like this instead of this (not really the best example, but I hope you get the idea). Jujutacular T · C 03:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- This could obviously be cropped to be symmetric. What type of angle are your suggesting however?--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 03:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I think a facade which is all about reflecting the surrounding environment should show a bit more of the urban context. Corner location not ledgible. -- Elekhh ( talk) 23:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Courcelles ( talk) 13:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)