From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 22

Template:Hotline Miami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I created this in 2015, but it's unnecessary. There's just two games, all directly related articles (sequel, predecessor, developer, publishers) are repeatedly mentioned in the articles. Not needed. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Writing/litspotlight1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

While this is marked as a transclusionless template, the page it is said to be used on, Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing/litspotlight, does not exist. There are also no incoming links to this. Gonnym ( talk) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IMDb rating

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

seems excessive, especially since IMDb ratings are changing as people vote at IMDb, and the icon goes against MOS:ICON. Frietjes ( talk) 17:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH elevation/high

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused and seems that Template:PH elevation was never a tempalte. Gonnym ( talk) 16:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH electorate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. 5 years ago this was apparently used and kept at TfD, but has since had its usages removed. Gonnym ( talk) 16:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH empty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused, undocumented and has no code in it. Gonnym ( talk) 16:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chronology of Gaullist groups in the Senate of France

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused political related table. Gonnym ( talk) 16:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pseudo image

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

generally redundant to the more widely used {{ image frame}} as demonstrated here, should be replaced and redirected. Frietjes ( talk) 15:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Float box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

can be replaced by {{ stack}}. float box has the same purpose as {{ stack}} (which has much heavier usage), should be replaced and redirected. Frietjes ( talk) 15:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nations at the 2026 Winter Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Too early for this. Can be recreated in a couple years. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete. WP:TOOSOON. And there is literally nothing to navigate. -- wooden superman 15:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Liberty ships templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 15:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A prime example of where categories and lists are a far better method than a navbox ( WP:CLT). These navboxes are horifically excessive and really aren't a particularly useful or efficient way to navigate between the topics, especially with most of them them lost in a sea of redlinks. -- wooden superman 15:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football at the 2019 South Asian Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Not enough blue links- only 2, and I don't believe that the squad articles that are red linked should be created, as the tournament doesn't have enough coverage for them to be independently notable Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Soft keep: Have coverage not bad actually, the SAG women tournament is played by the respective senior teams, and considered a big achievement in SA region. Adding few sources here for clarification, Firstpost, The Quint, AFC, Nepal Times, The Katmandu Post, India Today, Sportskeeda There are more. However, I am not sure of the red links, I can try to create the squads, but not now, occupied with other project right now. Drat8sub ( talk) 16:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Paul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused in mainspace. Izno ( talk) 01:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).