The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
These three new column-generating templates were used at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Autonomous Zones until I modified that page to use one of our existing column-generating template sets (without changing the page's appearance). We do not need yet another set of column-generating templates. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 21:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - I have no major quarrel with these being deleted, as you are correct that the same layout can be accomplished through existing layouts, however I would argue that creating a layout using this system seems easier to use, doesn't require any properties passed down to the templates and uses CSS Grid for the columns.
DominusVilicus (
talk) 10:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Please propose modification of one of the existing sets of column-generating templates, of which we already have too many, if you think that one of them could be improved. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 16:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request.
✗plicit 14:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Unused, brand new sidebar with a main article but no links to articles in the body. If this is still in development, it could be userfied. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 06:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete; yes, I was the one who created it, but it is now redundant due to the short-lived Music of Sonic the Hedgehog 1 and 2 article being merged into the main article.
Shadowboxer2005 (
talk) 07:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 05:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
This template does not meet
WP:NAVBOX. It is a collection of hundreds of articles that have little relationship except that they are people that were born in this town. These are not articles anyone would be "inclined to link in in the See also sections of the articles." (
WP:NAVBOX) This is what categories are for. Adding this to hundreds of articles is inappropriate. Note that this template was created after I objected to this editor misusing {{Dedham}} in the same way.
MB 01:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).