- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
replaced by
Module:Adjacent stations/Eurostar
Frietjes (
talk) 19:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
replaced by
Module:Adjacent stations/Thalys
Frietjes (
talk) 19:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with a main article currently in Draft space, and containing only red links. Not usable for the forseeable future. Userfy or delete. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
unnecessary nav template about a barely notable film artist who does not have any existing articles about the films to navigate to
PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Strongly Keep this is not Wikipedia page, that has to establish notability about anything. This director has a Wikipedia biography and his films are important. So, It's weird to think his films template is non-notable only because his films doesn't have article on them.
Abbasulu (
talk) 04:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete A navbox is useless without any articles or redirects to navigate to. Jahan's article already lists his films. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 04:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Regardless if the director or their films are notable, there are just no links here.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
unnecessary nav template about a barely notable film artist who only has one film to nav to
PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Strongly Keep this is not Wikipedia page, that has to establish notability about anything. This director has a Wikipedia biography and his films are important. So, It's weird to think his films template is non-notable only because his films doesn't have article on them.
Abbasulu (
talk) 04:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Regardless if the director or their films are notable, two links is not enough for a navbox.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
unnecessary nav template about a barely notable film artist who does not have any existing articles about the films to navigate to
PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Strongly Keep this is not Wikipedia page, that has to establish notability about anything. This director has a Wikipedia biography and his films are important. So, It's weird to think his films template is non-notable only because his films doesn't have article on them.
Abbasulu (
talk) 04:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Regardless if the director or their films are notable, there are just no links here.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
No links. Everything is red. No navigation.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and no links except for the arena where the team plays. Everything else is a pile of red.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Team and venue links are not enough for navboxes. The articles should be created first, then the navboxes.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
WBD templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 June 14.
Izno (
talk) 23:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Kazan Metro succession templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
This templates were replaced by
Module:Adjacent stations/Kazan Metro
ZandDev (
msg) 15:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 01:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
Two links outside the title page. Fails navigation.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).