- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 19:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and two links. Fails navigation.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 22:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 01:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
All fail basic navigation. All link to one or two articles outside the main team article in the title. The rest are links to articles sections and categories. Same as the
Long Island Ducks template I nominated on July 5.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 21:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 22:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on
minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired
PROD (a.k.a.
"soft deletion"). Editors can
request undeletion of these templates.
✗
plicit 00:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Two to three links respectively. Fails NENAN.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 22:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Only one article of relation to Max Verstappen, his wife. Other than that nothing else connects to the subject other than a broad relationship. Nothing direct.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete – Per nomination, except Verstappen is unmarried.
5225C (
talk •
contributions) 08:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: per
WP:Template creep. This is a completely inappropriate use of a navigational template per
WP:NAV-WITHIN. Links to his teams are already covered by those teams nav boxes (e.g.
Red Bull Racing has {{
RBR}}.) The link to 2021 (his championship winning year) is also covered by another existing template. The other links are unnoteworthy reletionships (with the possible exception of his short to mid term girlfriend. Ironically, the only link which should be in the template, and isn't covered to others is his father
Jos Verstappen.
SSSB (
talk) 08:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
No need for this template, as 90% of the links are red.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 22:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
Giant
Snowman 19:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - not needed due to limited blue links, but no prejudice to restoration if more articles get created...
Giant
Snowman 19:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as
G8 by
Doug Weller (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 14:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
The article for this page notice for has been deleted, so I assume this should be as well.
Aza24
(talk) 21:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Done.
Doug Weller
talk 13:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused map, has formatting issues that cause extra spaces when used in an article. No consensus exists for using it anywhere.
BilCat (
talk) 20:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only the main article and two others after I redirected
Heartbeat (Late of the Pier song) to the album.
Peter James (
talk) 17:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Guadalajara SITEUR navbox.
Izno (
talk) 23:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Guadalajara Macrobús navbox with
Template:Guadalajara SITEUR navbox.
It's unlikely that the bus stations would manage to have their articles in the near and mid-term future. The three links could be simply merged into a related section as they complement each other.
(CC)
Tbhotch
™ 16:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
The linked articles in the body of this navbox template were
recently deleted, therefore a navbox is no longer needed to navigate between them. Only two articles remain,
Bala Turkvision Song Contest and
Bala Turkvision Song Contest 2015 and navigation between them is easily accommodated with regular in-line wikilinks.
Grk1011 (
talk) 13:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant to {{
4TeamBracket}} with |compact=y
. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 04:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 22:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant to {{
4TeamBracket}}, with |sets=6
and |RD-shade=#A8D3FF
. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 04:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 22:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant since the creation of the new
Template:Andrea Palladio. A merger of the three previous templates into one is more helpful and in accordance with the templates purposes.
Mistico Dois (
talk) 14:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom
Aza24
(talk) 21:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 23:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant since the creation of the new
Template:Andrea Palladio. A merger of the three previous templates into one is more helpful and in accordance with the templates purposes.
Mistico Dois (
talk) 14:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom
Aza24
(talk) 21:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).