March 11
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep and mark historical (
Non-admin closure).
JJ98 (
Talk) 11:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:WikiProject Space (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Unused template,
WP:SPACE is now defunct.
JJ98 (
Talk) 18:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Holy smokes, the replacement it done? Awesome! Anyway, now that it's unused, can't we just redirect it to {{
WikiProject Spaceflight}}? Looking at the template history brings back good memories.. (*nostalgia*). I'm not sure I see the purpose in deleting it..
Mlm42 (
talk) 19:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, its already done, it has been replaced by {{
WikiProject Astronomy}}, {{
WikiProject Solar System}} and {{
WikiProject Spaceflight}}. I don't think a redirect is necessary.
JJ98 (
Talk) 23:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- You're right, a redirect isn't necessary.. but on the other hand, neither is deleting it? By the way, do you know why there are
thousands of page that link to this template? I haven't been able to figure it out..
Mlm42 (
talk) 03:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- mark historic. Add a red warning box to it so that any transclusion will warn the editor to replace the box. This template was used a long time by many users, so a notice about the new templates to use would be appropriate to leave around. And as long as we don't delete the WP:SPACE project page, I don't see any reason not to keep this around to point people to the current templates, provided that it has a transclusion notice to replace it when used.
184.144.160.156 (
talk) 06:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- I agree with an IP, I think it should be marked as historic, just like the {{
expand}} template. I that case, this template shouldn't be deleted.
JJ98 (
Talk) 08:41, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Support Historic marking - seems the least disruptive of ways to deal with it. Would oppose redirecting it to
WP:SPACEFLIGHT, as many projects have used it.
Colds7ream (
talk) 18:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Retain for historic purposes, no further application, but there are hundreds of references to it in past discussions, and many users are used to using it, so if nothing else it could become some form of template-space disambiguation page between the three templates that have replaced it. --
G
W
… 21:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Keep and mark historical per the others. Also, I like
184.144.160.156's suggestion. — Preceding signed comment added by
Cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs) 07:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Keep for history: I think it should be kept because of its historical value. Will allow people to see where we have been and came to in not a very long time.--
Navy
Blue84 17:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Keep and mark history per above.--
♫Greatorangepumpkin♫
T 17:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 06:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Button (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
This was
proposed for deletion in December 2010, but was kept as "Under construction". It's now March, and nothing has happened. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk) 18:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Honduran Liga Nacional squad templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
—
GFOLEY
FOUR— 23:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Remember to add {{
Tfd}} tags to the template you are tagging for deletion.
reply
-
Template:SearchImages (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Fails
WP:ELNO#EL9, unused.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) -
talk 08:06, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 06:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Location of Székely Land (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Purpose unclear; does nothing in its base state. Unused. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
Support The user that created this template is inactive on WP these months. It seems the template was created by mistake or its author gave it up (
Iaaasi (
talk) 07:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC))
reply
Support I agree with
Iaaasi. Unless the template is improved, it may be deleted, origibnally I wanted to create location map.
Rokarudi--
Rokarudi (
talk) 11:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
—
GFOLEY
FOUR— 23:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Long Beach, California (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Well-linked articles which
do not need a navbox. Unused. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as T3. NAC. —
Train2104 (
talk •
contribs •
count) 01:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:LogicInv (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
An announcement for the proper creation of a new WikiProject, which occurred in 2008. No longer needed. No transclusions. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- No objection
Greg Bard (
talk) 04:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.