The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted by User:Nichalp on 6 September 2008, reason: "Invalid license". – Black Falcon ^{( Talk)} 17:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Template:PD-India-Gov ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Misleading and redundant. All Government of India works are not in Public domain as per the copyright act. Currently just a redirect. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- Candlewicke ( Talk) 03:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete for the reasons stated at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 August 25#Template:InvalidSVG -- Doug.^{( talk • contribs)} 01:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Template:ValidSVG ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is even worse than the {{ InvalidSVG}} that has been also been nominated for deletion. Although having valid SVG is a laudable goal, this would result on this template being placed on every single SVG image, which would not be a good thing. KelleyCook ( talk) 20:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Keep The vast majority of SVG images on Wikipedia are in fact invalid, so it would not be placed on nearly every SVG image. Also, you said yourself having valid SVG is a laudable goal; this marks the ones that are valid. Also, there's a similar template on Commons.  — AMK1211 ^talk! 03:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Delete unnecessary to tag everything problem free. Bazj ( talk) 07:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Comment - It would be inconsistent to keep this when its counterpart's TfD resulted in a Delete. Bazj ( talk) 19:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom -- Candlewicke ( Talk) 03:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. — Wknight94 ( talk) 22:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Template:Cathead age of sail merchant ships of the ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in one category only and therefore seems unnecessary unless I'm missing something. I queried its need with the creator who hasn't yet responded. Moondyne 10:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

• Delete after moving elsewhere as it really doesn't need to be in a template. -- Candlewicke ( Talk) 03:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.