- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Archived to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Pokémon species
Philosopher
Let us reason together.
22:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Pokémon species (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Only used by one article, currently at AFD. Filled with in-universe information. Has been replaced by largely out-of-univese {{
Infobox VG character}} in articles that would use it. See
Pikachu and
Jigglypuff for examples.
Pagra
shtak
20:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Useless template, redundant to other templates which are better suited.
Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (
Broken clamshells •
Otter chirps •
HELP)
00:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Per nom.
Tatarian (
talk)
20:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete -
WP:BOLD
RUL3R (
talk)
20:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, this template has nothing to do with Pokemon.--
Free
way
guy
23:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Keep/redirect for historical reasons. We rarely keep a template for such reasons, but this one was once used by hundreds of articles (one for every Pokemon). Given the interesting evolution (no pun intended) of the pokemon article situation I think we should put this somewhere for historical context. --
Ned Scott
05:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Archive if possible, otherwise Delete. I can understand Ned's statement and agree with it, for historical reasons it would be a good idea to hold onto it.--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
10:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Archive per Ned Scott. Maybe in a
WikiProject Pokemon subpage?--
Aervanath
lives
in
the Orphanage
05:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete I was planning to nominate it b myself. It's nice someone did it a week earlier. --
Magioladitis (
talk)
13:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete
Philosopher
Let us reason together.
21:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Classic Albums (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
I'm having a hard time determining what constitutes a "classic album" or a "classic album series". The albums I checked did not self identify themselves as part of a classic album series or as a classic album. The list just appears to be one persons opinion of popular rock albums.
Apteva (
talk)
18:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- I thought the same thing when I first saw it, but it turns out the albums listed are those featured on the TV series
Classic Albums, which the template's title links to. Whether or not that warrants a navbox I don't know. --
Fru1tbat (
talk)
21:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- I see. I missed that. So should there be a navblock for all of the bands that appear on American Bandstand, or that were played on KSAN, or for sale at Tower Records? Putting the navblock at the bottom of each of the albums seems to give undue weight to them, and in my opinion serves no purpose.
Apteva (
talk)
01:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
Template:LithuaniaAirplayChartNav (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete by Golbez, NAC.
Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (
Broken clamshells •
Otter chirps •
HELP) 23:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Useless template, all three pages that are linked are up for deletion, as is the chart itself. Note that the chart is "hosted" on blogas.it.
Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (
Broken clamshells •
Otter chirps •
HELP)
17:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete --
Woohookitty
Woohoo!
07:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:External links cleaned (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Permanent cleanup template. Past consensus has been extremely clear that we do not want cleanup tags staying on articles forever. ---
RockMFR
03:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The docs for this template explicitly say that it should only be used if there is certain to be an ongoing problem with inappropriate external links. However, this is an ongoing problem with the entire Wikipedia, so maybe it's not necessary on an article-by-article basis.--
Aervanath
lives
in
the Orphanage
05:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Class II and III railroad templates