From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Waskerton

Waskerton ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

20 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Checked one of the SPAs at Christine Fang and the associated AfD, found some 2 year old socks. ST47 ( talk) 00:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I suspect this account is a sock being used by Waskerton for block evasion. (In the diffs labeled "Waskerton" I've included edits from the Waskerton account as well as other known socks of the same sockmaster.)

I'm requesting CheckUser attention because Waskerton is known to have used a number of socks in the past, so there may be others. (This is my first time filing an SPI, so please let me know if I've messed anything up.) — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 19:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 20:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
  • @ Mx. Granger: the most important thing about a SPI filing is that you present clear evidence, preferably in the form of diffs comparing current behavior to that of known socks. This you did in abundance, so thank you for that. We have limited historical data in this case, but I was able to glean a few hints from the CU logs which support the idea that Estnot is a Waskerton sock. Blocked as suspected. The nature of the data I have available didn't allow for an effective sleeper check. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply

28 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Could you check the users? Similarities are as follows.

Estnot going to noticeboard due to discussion not going their way: [32] [33]. Thundercloss going to noticeboard: [34] [35].

How Estnot argues, such as relying on headlines: [36]. How Thundercloss argues: [37] [38].

Estnot's interest touching on debt trap: [39]. Thundercloss' interest touching on debt trap: [40].

Please let me know if I have left out any step. Vacosea ( talk) 15:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Long edit histories of China heavy controversies: Estnot [41] Thundercloss [42]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vacosea ( talkcontribs) 16:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same interests as Waskerton's socks. Similar name as the latest blocked sock, Thundercloss ( talk · contribs), which brings up thunder cloud in Google search. Account created a few days after Thundercloss was blocked. Qiushufang ( talk) 03:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed. I don't know whether Waskerton is the same person as FobTown - they seem to live in the same city, and have similar interests, but if they are the same person then they are careful to keep the accounts they use on different devices separate. Blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 13:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC) reply

12 February 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Per-forma filing RoySmith (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
  • Well, bang goes my carrying his unblock to WP:AN. 😢

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments