Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Theyuusuf143

Theyuusuf143 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
12 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

This user is clearly a sock of the banned user Reer Woqooyi/ Theyuusuf143. If not, then a meatapuppet which have been popping up even before his ban.

Reasons:

1. User has been involved in the same content disputes as both other users [1] [2] [3] [4] Masters: [5] [6] [7] [8]

2.Has the same lack of understand of English [9] Masters: [10] [11]

3. Has the same editing styles [12] [13] Masters: [14] [15]

4. User could care less about consensus [16] Masters: [17] [18]

5. Current user has appears right after "theyuusuf13" is banned [19] Masters: [20] [21]

AcidSnow ( talk) 19:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC) reply

I see. "theyuusuf143" was a mettapuppet of the other user. He went on to this blog requesting other users go help me. Anyways, can you do something about the page? It's currently locked with the socks edit still there. AcidSnow ( talk) 17:58, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Reer Woqooyi and theyuusuf143 are different people. However, theyuusuf143 was called up to Wikipedia by Reer Woqopyi (he admits to asking others to help him here). AcidSnow ( talk) 20:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk endorsed. Almost all of the comparisons are between the puppet and Theyuusuf143. However, there has never been a finding that Theyuusuf is a puppet of Reer Woqooyi. There are obvious behavioral problems here, but the technical relationships need clarification. Some of the evidence above could be said of a great many editors. For example, foreign subjects are often edited by users whose primary language is not English. Also, there are many editors, unfortunately, who don't care about consensus. That said, I think there's enough here to endorse a CU, both to clear up Kurlibah and Theyuusuf143.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

27 June 2015
Suspected sockpuppets

Dandaawi ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

It seems that our friend Theyuusuf143 has returned. Recently, a single purpose account has been causing a lot of disruption on the Somaliland article. Anyways:

Both users are from Ireland: Dandaawi [22] and Theyusuuf143 [23]
Edits revolve strictly around the regions and cities claimed by Somaliland that are disputed with other Regional States of Somalia: Dandaawi [24] and Theyusuuf143 [25]. To clarify, the new account has yet to explained to other articles.
Have the same editing style, see here: Theyusuuf143 [26] and Dandaawi [27]
Have the same "bizarre" way of typing in English: Dandaawi [28] and Theyuusuf143 [29]
Both users don't indent their comments after someone: Dandaawi [30] and Theyusuuf143 [31]
Both users often add a space before their "?": Theyuusuf [32] and Dandaawi [33]
Both users are adamantly against Awdalland, Theyusuuf143 [34], sock of the Theyusuuf143 [35] [36], and Dandaawi [37]
Constantly accuse others of being of being "biased" and "Pro-Somalia": Sock of Theyusuuf143 [38] and Dandaawi [39]
Flat-out denies the existence of an already established consensus while defying it: See here where they make edits against consensus, Dandaawi [40] [41] [42] and TheYuusuf142 [43] [44] [45]. Their denial: Theyusuuf142 [46] and Dandaawi [47]
Enjoys editwaring (A report should have been filed against Dandaawi, but the account never received a warning): Dandaawi [48] [49] [50] [51] and Theyusuuf (look at his accounts history, it's not necessary to show a specific diff for something like this lol)

I could list a few more but I believe that this is enough. AcidSnow ( talk) 16:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC) AcidSnow ( talk) 16:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply

I see Bbb23. What do you think of the behavior and etc. that that I have shown? AcidSnow ( talk) 17:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
My apologize. I didn't know that it said at the top what you plan next. AcidSnow ( talk) 17:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I relinked 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Vanjagenije. However, links 3 and 4 are self explanatory as it shows their edit history which shows what their edits always revolve around. As for 5 and 6, they are visuals see it should be easy to see since the diffs (wiki codes) would screw it up. If you still need more than I will continue to add more.
As for you Dandaawi, I have already made it clear that the maps weren't misleading since Puntland claims all of Sanaag and Sool on its website: [52]. So don't claim that I knowledge something when it never happened. But it isn't surprising that you wouldn't acknowledge claims of socking against you since this is exactly what both of Theyuusufs socks did. In fact, they instead opted to make false accusations just like you are doing once again here in front of an admin.
Anyways, diffs 25 through 28 have nothing to do with whether Somaliland is this or that, rather you simply edit warring the map back in. So please don't twist my words. As for seeking third opinions, Theyuusuf143 did a similar thing with different users. In fact, he even sought Admin action for a solution to the problem. There Theyuusuf143 accused me and various other users of being the same the same individuals, something that horribly failed. More importantly, in what form of way is making numerous personal attacks and then denying every making one considered "negotiations"? It's simply harassment. You even claim that I never sought third opinions when I have. In fact, I requested Howicus, CambridgeBayWeather, and Rsrikanth05 to return to continue the discussion. However, they don't see it fit as a consensus has already been established. This is something you continue to deny: "All i see is you against the world. i see no consnsus". AcidSnow ( talk) 17:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


I think user acid is feeling the heat after he failed to bring evidences Supprting his self designed map. He first claimed that his map is not misleading "not even the slightest" He said [53]. but then he realised his map is indeed Misleading when i proved that even puntland Constitution does not claim Some places he marked as disputed areas, i appreciate how he accepted to fix some parts of his map. Then i asked him if he can bring evidence supprting his claim that awdallland exists as an state against Somaliland rule in Awdal which he failed to bring. Any one who reads these talk pages can seen i am the one trying to make solution or compromise. [54] [55] maps user acid is twisting Wikipedia edit rules and regulations for his advantage for example the Links he posted from 25 to 28 Is a problem that existed long before i first edited Somaliland page. See here the date and time it was done some time before i joined wiki [ [56]] i never tried to change Somaliland country official name or its political status from unrecognized to recognized. I just wanted to restore the original map only. I told user howicus that i did Some technical mistake while i was trying to restore the map. map and am very sorry about that. If i enjoy edit war why i put enormous efforts to seek mediation,comments and third opinions which he was not interested at all. I did more negotiation efforts than user Acid did. I am really very disappointed that we could not agree much. But i hope we can agree finally. Dandaawi ( talk) 15:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk note: This is my opinion: it is probable that Dandaawi is Theyuusuf143, but there is no evidence to prove it without any doubt. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: Not enough evidence to be sure about taking SPI action, and this page has been abandoned for over two weeks, so I'm going to close without taking any action. Please note that WP:SPI is only for discussing allegations of sockpuppetry; it is not a place for rehashing content disputes or personal arguments unless they relate narrowly to the question of whether two or more accounts are in fact being operated by a single editor. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Theyuusuf143/Archive&oldid=1076215936"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE