All the users have been created when a user was blocked or recently unblocked, only for making it look like the blocked /unblocked account has been sockpuppeting. I know of some more so I will add them later, because I don't know the exact name.
Abce2|
Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here)18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The
Benmols2 appears to be mirroring
WebHamster's style. Far to closely to be a genuine sockpuppet of that user, its just too obvious that this is meant to look like that user. This needs to be looked into, and much more deeply then I could. A check on all involved IP's plus (if posible) a wider search to see if any other black Sock accounts exists masceradibng as WebHammster.
Slatersteven (
talk)
19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)reply
It might be but there are other possibles (including myself) who WebHammster has had issues with. Untill a greater analysis has been carried out (by checking all IPs (regardless of who they are) relating to WeBHammsters actions over the last week or so) I don't think we can apportion blame (after all there are a lot of reasons this could have occured). All that I think we can say is that some one somewhere is not playing the game.
Slatersteven (
talk)
22:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Well (playing devils advocate) if you want to create an account for attacks but wish to draw attnetion awat from you that would be the way to do it. that is why I belive all parties involved in dispute (including Noloop) need to be checked.
Slatersteven (
talk)
13:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Well, back to the real reason I submitted this. User:Free Hans is a clear troll trying to make another user, User Frei Hans look bad by making it look like Frei Hans was socking.[
[1]] I forgot to get diffs, so just a sec.
Abce2|
Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here)19:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
What this case needs to move forward is actual evidence linking the listed accounts to eachother, in the form of
diffs. Please don't rely on folks reviewing contribs of posted accounts to notice what you noticed - make it obvious for us. Thanks,
Nathan T 18:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Rejected Please list which accounts are requested to be checked with their reasons. As this request stands now, it is an amalgam of requests and fishing. --
Avi (
talk)
04:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk endorsed All right, reading through the new evidence, I think there is enough similarity between the edits to back up a checkuser.
NW(
Talk)22:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)reply