From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2021

01 December 2021

Reason: Either this template also uses Template:Non-free reduce (template-protected), or both are sharing each other, or something like that. Also, this template may be potentially highly visible. George Ho ( talk) 06:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 27 transclusions. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
I don't get it. The other template has 88 transclusions. It doesn't look wide enough but is template-protected. -- George Ho ( talk) 20:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruptive edits by LVTW2 (123.192.182.76), who has been warned previously of edit warring and disruptive editing (in his talk page), starting October 29 trying to move Singapore from the overseas Chinese category to the one with native countries with significant populations. He keeps making the change for more than 10 times even if a consensus has not been reached in the talk page. I suggest either protect the page or ban LVTW2 (123.192.182.76) from editing this page again. Taekhosong ( talk) 19:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Still a content dispute; this can't be solved via protection. Lectonar ( talk) 20:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Lineupandwait ( talk) 20:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined no request made Amortias ( T)( C) 20:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit war. – DarkGlow17:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – since at least December 2020. Kleinpecan ( talk) 17:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs persistently adding bogus/unsourced information (mainly regarding a company called 'Shoe Ink' as a production company, yet not supported by any sourcing). Magitroopa ( talk) 18:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Magitroopa the IP is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/HarveyTeenager. wizzito | say hello! 18:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 22:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... Bot seems confused. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on this article, (by IP users and vandalism-only accounts) recent vandalism activity found. Severestorm28 ( talk) 23:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is minor, but someone keeps adding small font in the infobox against MOS:SMALL. They have said "so what, other articles do it" in an edit summary where I have directed them to the MOS. IP keeps changing, so I can't put more explanation/warnings on their TP. MB 21:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 22:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Protected a few hours after this request was made. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from IPs. [1] [2] [3] [4] I seem to recall that the article used to have indefinite semi-protection, until an edit war raised it up to full protection and expired a week later. ili ( talk) 23:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed-protection Persistent vandalism from auto-confirm accounts each day. 182.216.227.37 ( talk) 00:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Protected shortly after this request was made. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP/vandalism issues related to news about this person. 力停 ( talk) 00:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: On this page, there are constant vandalism. Germanico5468504 ( talk) 01:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a BLP; most vandalism includes defamation. This has been ongoing since the page was unprotected and will very likely continue due to the popular controversy surrounding this persons tiktok. TagaworShah (talk) 02:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 02:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant vandalism from IP addresses and a new user with no other edits. Dream Focus 04:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism, Apparently confused for another Ottis Anderson who shot his son. Adakiko ( talk) 04:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism from a handful of different IPs. Short semi-protection will likely help. RFZYNSPY talk 05:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site ( talk) 06:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page is being vandalised by IP user [5], who is a sockpuppet of user [6]. This user has been previously banned multiple times for hijacking the article Kabil, but this behaviour stopped when that page was semi-protected. They are now hijacking the article Ravana with identically disruptive editing, adding promotional content under the name "Yash Vignesh". Tamptonato ( talk) 06:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilri cgiar. Invalid OS talk 13:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sock was blocked 5 days ago and no further disruptive editing has taken place since then. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 14:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous amount of IPs asking for edits without consulting talk page and IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 18:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New user Rewdem is consistently re-adding content they want in, but has been reverted many times. User needs to discuss the changes first. Protecting the page will encourage them to the talk page. - FlightTime ( open channel) 20:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is a vandalisation magnet and because of his profile in the UK will continue to be so. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 22:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: snapchat username vandalism – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 11:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism Theonewithreason ( talk) 09:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 11:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and removal of sourced content Theonewithreason ( talk) 09:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 11:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassment/sockpuppetry from a WP:LTA. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably need some short semi, and some revdels. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The issue that caused the protection has been resolved, and if not a full unprotection, a severe reduction from the year protection it was given. It took nine days for an edit request to even be responded to, and it was not a satisfactory response. The response times are maybe only slightly better than what they were in the previous protected period -- 141.157.254.24 ( talk) 04:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

@ EdJohnston: Lectonar ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: : The page was recently semied per a complaint at AN3. I don't mind if another admin wants to remove the protection, but the recent problem with the edit request is due to the requester not filling it out properly. See the reason provided by User:AssumeGoodWraith for the most recent decline. You need to provide a "Change X to Y" in your comment in order for it to be acted on. In a quick look I could not see anything in the history about the supposed 100th Riverdale episode. If you can fill out the 'change X to Y' properly, leave a note on my talk page and I'll consider making the edit. According to List of Riverdale episodes, only 97 episodes have been aired. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
You looked too quickly. The 100th episode is set to air December 14th, as the request details. And the information was sourced in the request. It was probably assumed that the person who would respond would read the edit history and find the referenced edit, which if the request had probably been responded to in a timelier manner, wouldn’t have had as much digging. As seen here it was explained in great detail why it was added. You can also see that it was hidden until Wilkja19 removed the hiddenness but only added an episode title, leaving it vulnerable. And as the request came with multiple sources for the info, it would be absolutely silly for the entry to not be added. The page isn’t just about chronicling what has happened, but what will happen. So to base your hesitancy on “Only this amount has aired” when others are scheduled is also very silly.-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 15:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history and protection log. GZWDer ( talk) 15:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history. GZWDer ( talk) 15:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism mostly from mobile devices, due to recent media coverage on the UCAA loan situation with China Sputink ( talk) 15:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Schazjmd  (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The issue that caused the protection has been resolved, and if not a full unprotection, a severe reduction from the year protection it was given. It took nine days for an edit request to even be responded to, and it was not a satisfactory response. The response times are maybe only slightly better than what they were in the previous protected period -- 141.157.254.24 ( talk) 04:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

@ EdJohnston: Lectonar ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: : The page was recently semied per a complaint at AN3. I don't mind if another admin wants to remove the protection, but the recent problem with the edit request is due to the requester not filling it out properly. See the reason provided by User:AssumeGoodWraith for the most recent decline. You need to provide a "Change X to Y" in your comment in order for it to be acted on. In a quick look I could not see anything in the history about the supposed 100th Riverdale episode. If you can fill out the 'change X to Y' properly, leave a note on my talk page and I'll consider making the edit. According to List of Riverdale episodes, only 97 episodes have been aired. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
You looked too quickly. The 100th episode is set to air December 14th, as the request details. And the information was sourced in the request. It was probably assumed that the person who would respond would read the edit history and find the referenced edit, which if the request had probably been responded to in a timelier manner, wouldn’t have had as much digging. As seen here it was explained in great detail why it was added. You can also see that it was hidden until Wilkja19 removed the hiddenness but only added an episode title, leaving it vulnerable. And as the request came with multiple sources for the info, it would be absolutely silly for the entry to not be added. The page isn’t just about chronicling what has happened, but what will happen. So to base your hesitancy on “Only this amount has aired” when others are scheduled is also very silly.-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 15:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: They keep editing it and vandalizing it, so i want to protect it Shadymarko ( talk) 13:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done. I deleted the Draft that this seems to have been referring to as a blatant hoax. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 13:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Approximately 3 reversions by 2 users in the last 24 hours. The Tips of Apmh 17:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site ( talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 10:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 18:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer  Talk 11:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 18:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. People are getting sued over this, it should clearly be locked to Extended Confirmed users for as long as the dispute happens, especially since Kavanaugh himself has threatened lawsuits. ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 14:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm not seeing anything that would justify increasing the protection level; stopping people from continued editing (or manipulating the content of their edits) is what legal threats try to achieve – if we start protecting pages just because someone made one, we make that chilling effect even stronger. So, while I would advise that editors tread just as carefully as they should with any BLP, this is Not done. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 15:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by non-registered users to the page. TheVaughano ( talk) 08:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 18:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: People just put fake news and inappropriate things and words on the wikipage so the level of protection of the page should be semi so that auto-verified users can edit the page. Nikita Bhamidipati ( talk) 09:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless ( talk) 18:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somebody seems to want to test wether Wikipedia has a bug. Whatever, a temporary page protection might be a good solution. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

02 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent unsourced changes by IP/new users since the previous protection has expired. Ab207 ( talk) 07:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 01:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. More disruptive editing can be expected as the film is releasing tomorrow. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 10:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 01:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kleinpecan ( talk) 21:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Expires in 1 day, extend protection until AfD closes given the large amount of canvassing and vandalism. Dark-World25 ( talk) 07:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increased volume of vandalism from IP users. I think semi-protection would be sufficient to prevent the almost daily casual vandalism we see at the moment. Salimfadhley ( talk) 23:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

[ [7]

Reason: repeated vandalism by user Filetime who seems to be making multiple disparate edits across Wikipedia SplishSplashBath ( talk) 00:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – TFA attracting a lot of vandals. ZLEA T\ C 14:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism due to emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant after expiry of protection has resumed. 2402:3A80:6D5:9D77:C39:6D06:A8F2:F53D ( talk) 15:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The article was indefinitely fully protected, possibly in error. Indefinite ECP seems like it would be fine. dud hhr Contribs 19:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protect with template editor protection: Changing and removing image to this template that IP or user excessive vandalism. Maanshen ( talk) 10:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Template is already semi-protected. 488 transclusions, no history of vandalism. Semi-protection seems adequate for now. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Protected by MusikBot II. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sudden spike of vandalism and editing against what the sources are saying since yesterday Snowflake91 ( talk) 11:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of several users (includes: Carterist, Queerian, Pellumian) and needs a protection immediately to prevent further abuse. Severestorm28 ( talk) 02:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (similar to Demi Moore, includes the following vandalism users: Kent Gant, Klitops, Queerian, and Carterist) and needs protection immediately. Multiple users vandalizing this page and Demi Moore. Severestorm28 ( talk) 02:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism due to recent controversial remarks by subject of article. Spacemace1 ( talk) 04:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 17:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Concerted effort to incorrectly change birth-date. Saxones288 ( talk) 18:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Is there a reliable source for this birth-date in the first place? OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
He claims that August 1st is his birthday here, and denies that December 1st is his birthday here. Additionally, August 1st as Woods's birthday has been the consensus since 2008. Saxones288 ( talk) 18:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, both from registered user and sockpuppet(s). Anwegmann ( talk) 21:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Number vandalism by IPs. wizzito | say hello! 21:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Due to recent gossip on related to personal life LordeJennings ( talk) 00:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Was only vandalized by very similar IPs that are now blocked, it was likely the same person 2603:9000:7C02:64F0:B1DA:98C8:7EE2:E94D ( talk) 00:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Article is only PC-protected which doesn't prevent anyone from making legitimate edits. PC protection seems to be working quite well with this article. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Numerous details, information, and grammatical corrections need to be added to this article. This will help give the reader a more clear understanding of the event and all that is entails. 9NateDawggg7 ( talk) 19:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Every single time this page has come off protection (including its short stint being CRASHlocked) it's had to be re-protected almost immediately, as is evident in the log. What makes you think that it wouldn't just be re-protected again after the protection is removed? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This protection is no longer necessary as this article is quite old and not subject to much vandalism anymore. 6bxvr2 ( talk) 21:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Every single time this page has come off of protection it's had to be re-protected fairly quickly, as is evident in the log. What makes you think that it just wouldn't be re-protected again should the protection be removed? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expires tomorrow and given the recent media attention should probably be renewed. Dark-World25 ( talk) 07:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • @ Dark-World25: Believe me I will not hesitate to indefinitely ECP that page if there is any sign of disruption there. However, now that the protection's expired, things seem fairly quiet on that page, and I'm not really seeing any need to protect at all at this time. It's a very reasonable request for preemptive protection in what is a very complex situation. However we're quite simply not allowed to preemptively protect pages like that. We can keep this open to monitor the article for awhile though. ~Swarm~ {sting} 01:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:07, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page was locked earlier before months for hijacking attempts. It is now also still hijacked. 2409:4072:6391:5D3F:D1B9:FCF1:F056:7FCD ( talk) 12:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: The film satisfies WP:NFF, and is releasing in less than a year: https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/katrina-kaif-ishaan-khatter-siddhant-chaturvedi-starrer-phone-bhoot-release-july-15-2022/. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined I'd recommend taking this to WP:DRV to have a wider community discussion on whether or not the film satisfies WP:NFF. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Kleinpecan ( talk) 02:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 03:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is no consensus to remove the redirect, yet the redirect has been removed and readded numerous times. Suggest upping this to full protection. Anyone who wants to disambiguate this would need to get consensus at WP:RFD at the very least, or start an RfC on the talk page of this redirect. Aasim ( talk) 05:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Discussion started at WP:RFD, let's see how that goes first. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I cannot BELIEVE there is an edit war on this page, but... there you are. Over a dozen times in the last year, an IP editor (from different addresses) has removed a phrase at the end of the plot summary, and User:Neel.arunabh has reinserted it. I warned Neel.arunabh, and left a note on the talk page for the article asking for a discussion to occur there, but less than 12 hours later, an IP user removed the phrase again, without discussion. I THINK semi-protection is what I'm asking for here, but this is my first protection request, so if that's not right, please let me know. PianoDan ( talk) 17:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Thanks for starting the discussion at article talk. I have responded there and will monitor activity. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Approximately 3 reversions by 3 users in the last 24 hours. The Tips of Apmh 17:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Political candidate whose page has been vandalized by different IPs over the last two days. User:Namiba 18:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined The problems are not sufficient to justify protection. Ping me if it escalates. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by LTA Jinnifer, See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. MrOllie ( talk) 15:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by LTA Jinnifer, See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. MrOllie ( talk) 15:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Redirect hijacked by IPs or new accounts 4 times since August to talk about a sports website. Any new article should go through AFC. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 22:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes it has. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sudden spike of vandalism and editing against what the authentic sources are saying since yesterday by joy700 ForeverSadhana ( talk) 06:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption going back to May 2021 from a series of Northern Irish IPs. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 17:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced material by IP editors. Page was protected multiple times before, and the disruption started as soon as the last protection ended. Ïvana ( talk) 00:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection was removed and vandalism has restarted. The topic is known from book, films, and games, and is likely to remain vulnerable to juvenilia for many years. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:24, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-hopping from multiple users and anonymous editors. livelikemusic ( TALK!) 15:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-hopping from multiple users and anonymous editors. livelikemusic ( TALK!) 15:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Today's Google Doodle; could use protection. wizzito | say hello! 15:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The issue that caused the protection has been resolved, and if not a full unprotection, a severe reduction from the year protection it was given. It took nine days for an edit request to even be responded to, and it was not a satisfactory response. The response times are maybe only slightly better than what they were in the previous protected period -- 141.157.254.24 ( talk) 04:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

@ EdJohnston: Lectonar ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: : The page was recently semied per a complaint at AN3. I don't mind if another admin wants to remove the protection, but the recent problem with the edit request is due to the requester not filling it out properly. See the reason provided by User:AssumeGoodWraith for the most recent decline. You need to provide a "Change X to Y" in your comment in order for it to be acted on. In a quick look I could not see anything in the history about the supposed 100th Riverdale episode. If you can fill out the 'change X to Y' properly, leave a note on my talk page and I'll consider making the edit. According to List of Riverdale episodes, only 97 episodes have been aired. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
You looked too quickly. The 100th episode is set to air December 14th, as the request details. And the information was sourced in the request. It was probably assumed that the person who would respond would read the edit history and find the referenced edit, which if the request had probably been responded to in a timelier manner, wouldn’t have had as much digging. As seen here it was explained in great detail why it was added. You can also see that it was hidden until Wilkja19 removed the hiddenness but only added an episode title, leaving it vulnerable. And as the request came with multiple sources for the info, it would be absolutely silly for the entry to not be added. The page isn’t just about chronicling what has happened, but what will happen. So to base your hesitancy on “Only this amount has aired” when others are scheduled is also very silly.-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 15:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply
I should point out no statement has actually been made on decreasing protection, yet the bot keeps coming in trying to archive it-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 17:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I want to delete the part where it says that "No Way Home outpaced Endgame in it's first day of pre-sales" because it didn't. It actually had the biggest pre-sales since Endgame (which I would say would put it in 2nd place of highest first day of pre-sales). Here's my source, straight from Fandango, which states that "#SpiderManNoWayHome had Fandango's biggest first 24-hours in pre-sales since Avengers: Endgame." And here's the link: https://twitter.com/Fandango/status/1465727327267078144?s=20

Deadline completely took the words apart and assumed, but Wikipedia is not for assuming but for facts which are stated above and in the tweet linked above. 108.54.79.86 ( talk) 01:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

We can't cite Twitter (No editorial oversight). Provide a link to the actual article that supports the claim. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined See above; if a link to a reliable source can be provided, please make an edit request on the artilce talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 10:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protection was recently removed, and the vandalism has restarted. This is a vulnerable page and it seems to be wasting a lot of admin time. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined it's only been a couple of weeks since unprotection was tried and there have been three vandal edits, but with pending changes none of those have been visible to the reader. If this was a BLP, I'd absolutely be reprotecting, but I think we can afford to see how this one plays out. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, ip was already reverted by 2 different editors Theonewithreason ( talk) 21:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. A user has brought up a major concern for this page, this page has been vandalized far too long. I believe semi-protection will help this page from being vandalized. SoyokoAnis - talk 14:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs ( talk) 15:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I checked the article's protection log and also talk page edit requests after ECP. This article is under constant disruptive editing by editors who have some WP:COI with PFI.

They don't care what secondary reliable sources say about PFI, they care what primary sources say about PFI, and what they beleive in.

The only thing they want is to remove all sourced content, that are critical and shows the organization in negative way.

I can promise that, they will continue forever. Some even with ECP, as with this edit of Tanjeem Ahmed which was reverted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Popular_Front_of_India&diff=1040713877&oldid=1040710596

ECP will make it easier for Wikipedians. There are endless IPs and new accounts that will remove well sourced negative content, and there is a chance of good faith editors getting into edit warring.

Please also read the green section in the article talk page "Sources to check before edit requests". Knight Skywalker ( talk) 11:07, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There haven't been 10 edits since August. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
There was 10 edits since august, as the page was protected by Oshwah till November 2021. Now, PFI activists and fans from all over the world will rewrite as neo-social organization, philanthropist organization, disregarding sources. Knight Skywalker ( talk) 13:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption and refusal to talk on the talk page. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 13:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 16:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page is suffering from multiple instances of vandalism during the past 12 hours. This page is featured in the "Did you know" section on the main page, so protection for the rest of the day should be sufficient. Renerpho ( talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Examples: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Renerpho ( talk) 14:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian ( talk) 17:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: More IP disruption since protection was lifted. I can't begin to count how many times I and other users have had to undo all this disruption. Requesting protection through at least the end of January. TheVHSArtist ( talk) 16:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP in the 2a02:c7e:18b2:7300 range against guidelines and consensus: [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Thanks. Sundayclose ( talk) 17:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 17:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism from block evader / LTA Jinnifer, See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. MrOllie ( talk) 14:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing sources and maintenance templates. The Banner  talk 14:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple new and IP editors inserting unconfirmed and unsourced new coach. Schazjmd  (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection due to recent persistent vandalism, this page has had to be protected 8 times in the past also due to this reason. May be a good idea to start considering indefinite protection on this page due to this reason. Thanks. JAH2k ( talk) 15:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. HurricaneEdgar 11:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism DebbyBreelee ( talk) 15:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk)
17:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 14:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism, look in "View History", there's vandalism every 2 edits. Lallint⟫⟫⟫ Talk 21:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's today's featured article, so vandalism should trail off by tomorrow. clpo13( talk) 21:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. The Banner  talk 21:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The page is full of bias, misinformation and many inappropriate lies that are not true. This page needs to be reviewed and revised. Wikipedia has a responsibility to accurately define groups and organizations in a non-bias manner. What was written was clearly written for political deception and manipulation. 2600:8800:2304:D000:D5E4:BE83:C5D2:F9E2 ( talk) 07:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined This page isn't going to be unprotected anytime soon. Feel free to use {{ edit extended-protected}} requests on the article's talk page, or register an account and become extended confirmed if you'd like to edit this article. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply
It cuts both ways, IP. As it happens, there are also Project Veritas stans who have been attempting to whitewash the article over the past several years. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

03 December 2021

Reason: Edit Warring, 3RR, a user is deleting POV tags and CN tags Skiyabu1 ( talk) 18:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined You appear to be the edit warrior here. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, it is quite common for IPs (mostly pakistani nationalists) to vandalize this page. Noorullah21 ( talk) 18:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only 1 IP edit in the last month. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Protection of LTA targeted articles

Reason: High level of LTA disruption. The person behind this LTA disruption has edited through almost 10 different accounts/IPs (if not more) in a space of more or less a month (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Araxes TheThief/Archive). He is currently still at it. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 19:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism over several months by IPs (often dynamic), including: random removal/move of polling data, inclusion of fake polls, inclusion of fake fieldwork data, inclusion of random data, etc., with the danger of some of these changes going unnoticed for weeks. It should be protected so that only auto-confirmed users (and not IPs) can edit the page. Impru20 talk 19:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism, he keeps changing name of the club Raków Częstochowa for no reason and is unwilling to provide any reason. Piotr Bart ( talk) 19:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Almost nothing good coming out of IP edits on this one – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 11:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Request permanent e-c protection. This is an ARBPIA article which is under attack from IPs and always will be unless the current AfD succeeds. Zero talk 11:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems like all IP edits on this page so far since it was put on TFA are not constructive, and it's beginning to be a hassle to work on it and remove vandalism at the same time. It's an article I wrote to FA status so I am obviously WP:INVOLVED. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 12:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page has been protected without pause since 2012, but I don't think the page is at as much of a risk of vandalism as it used to be since Homestuck ended and isn't nearly as popular. In my opinion it warrants a trial period at the very least since it's been such a long time. Davepeta ( talk) 01:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Acroterion: Lectonar ( talk) 10:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Unprotected – for the bot. Favonian ( talk) 12:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this is getting ridiculous. Wretchskull (alt) ( talk) 11:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS ( talk) 14:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 18:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An unconfirmed IP user keep adding unsourced contents or poorly cited contents. Please consider adding page protection. Aerkdude ( talk) 15:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent article hijacking by a previously banned sockpuppeter - I have filed an SPI report here [15] for further details. The article being requested saw some disruptive editing from this user under the username 'Doms leave' on 2 December, before this user was banned. They have now come back as an IP user and are likely to engage in the exact same behaviour as before. Tamptonato ( talk) 16:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. User blocked. Can extend block if they continue after it expires. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP-disruption since november 21. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: So much interference in my article, please protect my page. Aqzswxdecfrvgtb ( talk) 18:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (alt) ( talk) 12:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive more than a week ago. Lectonar ( talk) 17:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Invalid OS talk 16:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple instances of vandalism by IP users of similar nature regarding a Ph.D. thesis conspiracy theory in the last few days, see:

See Tsai_Ing-wen#Ph.D._conspiracy_theory for discussion of this from a few years ago.

DrIdiot ( talk) 16:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 17:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It's a talk page. It doesn't need to be protected. 154.47.104.174 ( talk) 18:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Bbb23 ( talk) 18:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

04 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced or unreliably sourced content by IP editors, including repeated attempts to add unreliable "audience scores" to article with no response to warnings on user talk pages or to the article talk page discussion that took place during the previous page protections. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 18:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 22:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Requesting long duration semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive editing. As noted on the talk page of the article, this began in January of 2021 where a series of IPs (likely being used by the same person, given geolocate) have been attempting to edit war from "actress" to "actor" on this page, despite discussion on the talk page, despite the actress herself self identifying as "actress" ( twitter bio). IP keeps range hopping, so blocking an IP won't help. I'm an administrator, but given how many times I've reverted this it could be construed that I'm involved (though I don't think I am). Therefore, out of an abundance of caution, requesting another admin. Another admin previously applied a three month protection. Disruptive editing has resumed and continues unabated. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: A twitter drama between band members. People keeps on messing with the lineup. The band is still active and the same for the moment. Frdptrs ( talk) 00:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by same LTA one day after expiry of last semi-protection. Loafiewa ( talk) 23:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced addition of what they are calling her middle name "Gay" Note:She came out not too long ago. - FlightTime ( open channel) 02:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This appears to be verifiable, although I'd have preferred an inline citation outside of the infobox too. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopping vandal from Swedesboro, New Jersey adding nonsense threads. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 05:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting "Pending Changes Protection" on page, due to repetitive placement of hoaxes and other content, thus causing the page to be filled with reverts. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 01:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since 28 November. BusterD ( talk) 03:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to add an apparently non-notable person to this list against WP:LISTPEOPLE. No source to show the person's connection to the city. No Wikipedia article to show his notability. Subject's own YouTube channel of him playing music used as source for his supposed notability. user:GavinDawson75 was recently indef'ed over this, and now two IPs are restoring his edits. Meters ( talk) 05:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Has been explained in edit summaries, on the article's talk page, and on the users' talk pages. Meters ( talk) 05:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Was also added by two other IPs before the named account. No range block possible. Meters ( talk) 11:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And now another new named account has shown up to edit the article to claim that it includes non-notable entries. Meters ( talk) 03:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also created a SPI case: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/83.100.199.241. BusterD ( talk) 06:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA, also the subject of the article has posted on his blog about this deletion discussion. nableezy - 21:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 21:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 05:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting "Pending Changes Protection", as the page is not disruptively edited everyday but almost on a weekly basis, and every other edit on the page is basically a revert. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 02:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. BusterD ( talk) 03:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 06:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing over the past few weeks by the same user who also uses a different IP address. That user adds the same information without explanation although it's poorly cited. Twixister ( talk) 06:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Being edited with unnecessary information/misinformation and being edited by users with inherent bias towards the subjects criminal activity. Nh550 ( talk) 07:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes & vandalism by anon sock. Adakiko ( talk) 12:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. from IP Addresses following a poor performance on Thursday Night Football. Swagging ( talk) 13:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Andrew_Cuomo&action=history. Ethan Gaming 7640 17:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Js22003 ( talk) 02:58, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Highly visible character due to 10 Wicket Haul. Lots of IP edits. Techie3 ( talk) 07:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Just about to log this myself - thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of recent disruptive editing by dynamic IPs. — Sundostund ( talk) 07:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Random disruption by multiple IPs – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 07:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, IPs and new editors adding conspiracies about COVID vaccines to the article. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 08:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Beginning on 2 November 2021, the same WP:NOR material has been added to the article, either by an IP editor or a registered User. This WP:CRYSTAL edit is persistently reinserted after it has been reverted:

123456.

Both the registered User and IP editors have received warnings for disruptive edits in this article, and others. I have no means to prove it, but I believe one person is behind this edit and is making it via different methods. Page protection of the article will at least stop the unconstructive editing via IP address only. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 10:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mix of IPs/fresh accounts making one-byte edits for the sole purpose of inserting WP:SPAM in edit summaries. A similar case is Sheng Siong, which was indefinitely semi'ed back in 2019. ~  KN2731 { talk · contribs} 10:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An unregistered user has been repeatedly removing content on the actions of this school's principal. The content is sourced and relevant. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 06:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial political topic and has been subject to constant vandalism or changes. Nizil ( talk) 07:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 08:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: her Wiki Page need Protection because she is a famous star .and random haters can change her wiki (wrongly)for a lot of wrong purposes Saba.bilal ( talk) 14:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject’s article is being changed to say that he is now the football coach at Oklahoma. He’s not. While that coaching position is open, this subject isn’t really one of the rumored candidates. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 08:52, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – need to let at least two IPV6 editors cool off for a while. They seem to have issues with the content but are just edit warring and using the edit summary to "discuss", totally oblivious to other editors. Mako001 ( talk) 09:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of both IP and recently created user vandalism. Literally one or two every day for the past week. Zhomron ( talk) 15:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism from IPs. Constant removal of unsourced content and violations of MOS. – DarkGlow16:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Page is getting attacked by multiple IP's. TylerBurden ( talk) 02:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring 98.230.196.188 ( talk) 23:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ 98.230.196.188: please note this is the wrong venue for this, Consider taking it to Wp:AN3 Chip3004 ( talk) 23:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 01:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Vandalism seems to have stopped. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro ( talk) 09:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., vandalism mainly occurred in October, with one instance in mid-November, nothing sufficiently recent to justify protection-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User repeatedly adding irrelevant, unsourced information. Dexxtrall ( talk) 19:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Annamargarita0 ( talk) 12:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring / political POV pushing by a rotating cast of IP editors. MrOllie ( talk) 12:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

05 December 2021

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP address 162.82.155.169. Claims that his edit "fixes" grammar, when in reality it doesn't. Also harasses people in edit summaries. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 20:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP came back. Vacant0 ( talk) 10:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Fake news. False allegations, The left wing bias is palpable, Wikipedia has no shame. Just like N,Y,T.,WaPo, CNN, MSDNC.... 172.58.221.155 ( talk) 21:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Acroterion (talk) 21:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Gave the IP an American Politics DS warning. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Probably just a drive-by gripe. Acroterion (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page has been edited several times and several users put informations which are not even confirmed yet and several times while editing and putting in the latest official informations on the page someone will undo it making it difficult to edit thus protection should be added on the page at least for a month so that the edits can be done without any IP users disrupting and undoing the edits made. Nikita Bhamidipati ( talk) 11:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dozens of unsourced edits being made, I am wary of fouling foul of 3RR. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha ( talk) 10:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not currently see a need for an extended confirmed protection though-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01( talk) 12:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeateting the same reasons again.

I checked the article's protection log and also talk page edit requests after ECP. This article is under constant disruptive editing by editors who have some WP:COI with PFI.

They don't care what secondary reliable sources say about PFI, they care what primary sources say about PFI, and what they beleive in.

The only thing they want is to remove all sourced content, that are critical and shows the organization in negative way.

I can promise that, they will continue forever. Some even with ECP, as with this edit of Tanjeem Ahmed which was reverted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Popular_Front_of_India&diff=1040713877&oldid=1040710596

ECP will make it easier for Wikipedians. There are endless IPs and new accounts that will remove well sourced negative content, and there is a chance of good faith editors getting into edit warring.

Please also read the green section in the article talk page "Sources to check before edit requests". Knight Skywalker ( talk) 06:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism is happening a lot on that page ! Unconfirmed users are writing offensive names and changing the format of the page. Please consider to put protection on the page Nikita Bhamidipati ( talk) 11:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit-war since May by dynamic ip's and SPAs. Hipal ( talk) 19:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ethan Gaming 7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 02:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian ( talk) 09:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism.  melecie  t - 06:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian ( talk) 09:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Half a dozen reverts over the last 24 hours between dynamic edit-warring IPs (also involving likely block evasion by ( Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NhatMinh1701 and probably another sockmaster). — MarkH21 talk 12:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: To protect the subcategory of "Historical flag/Foreign-involved flags" from being edited. 厚德载物自强不息 ( talk) 08:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte ( talk) 08:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent disruption and vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Unabated since the last PP and is not going away anytime soon, article is covered under WP:ARBIP. Asking for long-term ECP. Gotitbro ( talk) 10:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 11:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:08, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots and lots of IPs or old abandoned accounts coming to add some YouTube thing; [16] and [17] are typical. JBL ( talk) 11:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page is being hijacked again by new IP addresses of previously banned user who was the subject of a previous protection request for this article. The exact same patent nonsense promotional content is being consistently added. Tamptonato ( talk) 13:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple unregistered users edit the page to include false information, it has become tiring to keep fixing this edits. SecondLooneyaccount ( talk) 14:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of an unsourced content: An IP hopper replaces "Ethiopian" with "Erithrean" whereas the attached source clearly says "Ethiopian". Pending changes should be fine. Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro ( talk) 14:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 12:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeat hijacking. 2409:4072:600C:A06:6F:669D:8F6D:CFF5 ( talk) 17:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 12:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 21:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 12:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – LTA. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 02:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Talk page access revoked by administrator. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:08, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Changing of birth date and height to an improbable figure. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 10:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Should redirect to Kiwi Farms. Kleinpecan ( talk) 06:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected but redirect created. El_C 12:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA: Nabasile. Amaury16:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, personal attacks, and insults on the user page of @ Kj1595 Bes-ART Talk 22:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: All the edit and Informations are false and done with an intention to paint a wrong image. As Wikipedia presents the correct information, these misleading and completely false (see the reference to Tigray/Tigrayans in the article), it requires a serious edit which can't be done only by selected persons. I am ready to provide more examples (or excerpts) from the description if you require. 153.96.116.4 ( talk) 15:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Acroterion (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP disruptive editing has resumed since protection lapsed; suggest indefinite, thanks Danstronger ( talk) 17:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu ( talk) 19:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Featured on the Main Page. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 01:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism from a variety of IPs. — Chevvin 17:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Favonian ( talk) 21:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protection - recurring vand from variable IPs, especially in past month. Dl2000 ( talk) 23:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are constantly trying to vandalise by inserting the word foundation (I think?) in Japanese into the infobox caption. 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 ( ☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) Scray the foot ( ☑️ rights) D'oh! 23:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection for reasons of occasional vandalism adding unsourced and biased edits into the article. I've spotted three users (two accounts + one IP) with only one activity record which showed them purging chunks of the article. I have restored some myself. At the moment, most of the article's edits (whether good or bad) are coming from one user. Goldenwikifruit ( talk) 07:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: I've stumbled upon this page, and (unsurprisingly) nothing constructive has come out of non confirmed users and IPs. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 13:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit war between two new accounts, the lower intensity is supported by official sources. The higher one is not. Possible sockpuppetry is involved as some LTAs are in the habit of vandalizing storm intensities. TornadoLGS ( talk) 18:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Disruptive editing began almost as soon as previous semi-protection expired. TornadoLGS ( talk) 19:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected – 3 months. Intense warring about storm intensity among a group of newly-created accounts and also some IPs. If you believe this is sockpuppetry, please supply details. EdJohnston ( talk) 21:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply
A couple apparent LTAs tend to target hurricane articles, changing wind speeds just enough to bump the storm up or down a category and repeatedly reverting. Bumping strong category 4 hurricanes to category 5 is one of the more common forms of this. Admittedly, I am less than certain, as there are some good-faith, albeit misguided, changes to intensities based on original research or less-reliable online source. TornadoLGS ( talk) 22:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

06 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sakiv ( talk) 23:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 20:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: unknown IP is vandalizing the chokha page. some georgian nationalist is trying to claim an outfit that ALL caucasians wear Cherkezy ( talk) 16:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, This is at ANEW - reporter is one of the edit warriors. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increase in protection level: An user named ChongPong is repeatedly making disruptive edits. Diptyajit ( talk) 19:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 20:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated changes by IPs in the languages spoken, promoting Bengali and diminishing Hindi. The Banner  talk 20:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Present vandalism from IP users. Swagging ( talk) 23:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated disruptive edits from IP addresses, and edit warring from same. Ithizar ( talk) 00:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Train of Knowledge ( Talk) 00:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 01:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP/new editors adding unsourced new coaching position. Schazjmd  (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already done. (CC) Tbhotch 01:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Present Vandalism. Swagging ( talk) 21:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already done. (CC) Tbhotch 01:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obnoxious vandalism. $chnauzer 22:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 01:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the episode was shit so it makes sense to vandalise it . 2A02:C7F:773B:F900:4878:6BEB:CA4A:18ED ( talk) 21:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I don’t know how to Wikipedia but this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vanquishers

I’ve only been on a registered account for a few days but even I could probably decline this one. You basically said “I don’t like his hat so let’s egg his car” -- CreecregofLife ( talk) 21:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Strong candidate for Worst Rationale Ever! Favonian ( talk) 21:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You are correct, that’s exactly what I’m saying.

IP, I suggest you quit while you're behind. Persisting in this will likely end with the IP range you're on blocked (as admins are aware of the futility of blocking a single ipv6 address and thus block /64s instead). — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: The history of this draft is that it is entirely the work of unregistered editors, and that unregistered editors are removing the AFC templates and resubmitting tendentiously. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from multiple accounts. HeinzMaster ( talk) 00:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs and socks. wizzito | say hello! 01:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry - DrBoller and various IP socks of his have been POV pushing and edit waring at this article to try to force obscure historic names for these drugs into the lead (e.g. "Chemical Lobotomy") 192.76.8.80 ( talk) 01:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 02:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Needs standard Israel/Palestine protections. Bob drobbs ( talk) 02:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Daniel ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly-made and IP users keep vandalizing the page. Ue3lman ( talk) 16:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More than one IP are targeting the page since weeks. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 23:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping user. Areaseven ( talk) 23:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been disruptive editing non-stop for several days now. — YoungForever (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from user, violating WP:CRYSTALBALL. Xexerss ( talk) 19:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Daniel ( talk) 02:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent possible coaching change, but not yet official per WP:SPORTSTRANS. If true, then only needs about 24hrs protection Yosemiter ( talk) 03:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There seems to be an edit war in the article. Neel.arunabh ( talk) 03:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from user (Oinkers42), replacing show logo file with fanmade SVG, claiming it's from the show's Twitter account. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 19:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 08:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PaullyMatthews notes this page as a known target of the sockmaster. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Favonian ( talk) 15:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and persistent disruptive editing since the last semi-protection expired. Only one of the twelve edits by anonymous users since the prior semi-protection expired has not been reverted (and even that one is kind of questionable). Some revdels are probably appropriate here too. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 10:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Favonian ( talk) 15:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It appears to be far more useful to have this unprotected in order to use it as a honeytrap to make it easier to find the socks who seem to love it. Yeah, unconventional, but, well, why not? At present they are spamming Cervantes into other articles. It's easier to SPI them when they edit Cervantes FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 23:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This isn't protected, or if it is the protection is anomalously unlogged. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I am probably mistaken. I was working from memory (faulty?) rather than logs FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 23:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The confusion is probably due to WP:ACPERM, as the mainspace title is effectively semiprotected. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I'm grateful. Thank you FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 23:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not again! Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined Procedural. Lectonar ( talk) 08:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 23:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC) 23:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 16:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian ( talk) 17:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IP addresses. Shritwod ( talk) 13:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 15:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent edits that replace the term - 'Russia' and 'Russian' - used by the cited source, (Obolensky's 'The Byzantine Commonwealth'), with the term - 'Kievan Rus' or 'Rus' - by an unregistered editor. There is an ongoing edit war, with myself reverting. Urselius ( talk) 13:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 15:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular vandalism from IPs. Persistent removal of sourced content that references Buddhism and the addition of unsourced content. KashKarti ( talk) 15:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 15:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 17:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. BusterD ( talk) 20:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn  (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA Orchomen. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen‎. Amaury18:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian ( talk) 18:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant vandalism by rival schools' students, and recent expiry of IP block on Choate network. Toadspike ( talk) 15:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The last edit war (before Choate’s IP was blocked, perhaps with similar repercussions at Deerfield, though I have no information on this) happened two years ago. Since the vandalism resumed almost immediately after the block was lifted, I think there is no reason to assume that further vandalism will not occur. Protecting this one page seems like a less intrusive solution than blocking hundreds of users in a renewed IP block, and would also prevent vandalism from other schools, such as the recent edit from NMH. Toadspike ( talk) 17:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple incidents of IP vandalism, one of which originated from subject's employer. Syntax74 ( talk) 15:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (Filing on the user's behalf.) MPFitz1968 ( talk) 18:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

07 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption of disruptive editing after protection expired. lpdelaware.org is the official website linked from the national party [18]. Their alternate organization is a fake one. ―  Tartan357  Talk 22:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP/new user vandalism over the past few months. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 23:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Train of Knowledge ( Talk) 23:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Violations of the BLP policy Shadowbreath15789 ( talk) 04:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors, presumably people who are invested into an MLM scheme and are unable to come to terms with its pyramid structure, add poorly-sourced content attempting to defend the topic at least a few times each month. Pending changes allows for the rare helpful edit to be accepted and the article is edited infrequently enough for PC to be helpful. feminist (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA: Nabasile. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nabasile. Amaury16:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Permanent protection: This article has served its purpose, and recent additions are mostly WP:NPA, WP:NOR and WP:Neutral violations. Events were accurately added as they happened but as time passes by, inaccurate and recent cultural trend-based propaganda-driven additions are being made during the recent time. Current edits and new sources to these past events are not as accurate as the edits when this decade went on and the sources used within the 2000 to 2009 time frame. The more new edits that gets added in recent times, the more inaccurate the article is becoming. As it stands now after a few interventions it is in OK shape, and I think its time to close the coffin lid on this article and let it stand uneditable for good, and let the new uses do whatever they want to current 2010s and 2020s decade, most of the events that happened in the 2000s were before they were even born, so to stop them from making any more inaccurate edits, and make it only editable by admins, stewards, etc, I request this article be permanently protected for good so thats IPs and regular uses including the likes of extended confirmed users myself can never touch it again. Time has gone for the article, and recent additions with recent sources are just propaganda-driven and mostly inaccurate and WP:NOR violation. So please permanentally protect this article. Dilbaggg ( talk) 16:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We do protect pages which are being frequently disrupted, but that's clearly not the case here. Last disruptive edit was two weeks ago. I must look back into mid-October to find any revert dispute. BusterD ( talk) 20:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Beacause of the recent controversy about Murad in Bangladesh, disrupted editing is being done on the page. — Yahya ( talkcontribs.) 17:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. After two attempts to add uncited information were reverted, another editor created a section with strong citation including reliable sources in both English and Bengali(though my Bengali is non-existent so I'll AGF on those). BusterD ( talk) 20:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 22:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 22:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. BusterD ( talk) 23:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA: Nabasile. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nabasile. Amaury16:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep adding a date of death to this (presumably still living) BLP without adding a source. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Whenever he (or another official) makes a contraversial decision, the page is subject to vandalism. It's happened a few times this year. If the indefinite PC is denied, can we have temporary semi-protection following the latest (apperently) contraversial moment. SSSB ( talk) 18:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Amortias. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism LTA Jinnifer from sockpuppets and IPs. See [[See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer. MrOllie ( talk) 01:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The institution is legally registered as the Darul Huda Islamic Academy. Leading universities in India refer to the institution as "Darul Huda Islamic Academy". No university in India has used the term Islamic University to refer to this institution. Since 2009 the institution has been promoting the keyword University. Currently some users are trying to promote the article. They have done the same in the case of Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi earlier. Sabeelul hidaya ( talk) 04:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Update: Persistent vandalism by various IP addresses. Sabeelul hidaya ( talk) 18:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: continuous IP vandalism. ManaliJain ( talk) 05:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism; unsourced details being added through different IP addresses even after getting reverted. ManaliJain ( talk) 05:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing IP addition of grammar errors, plus ongoing IP vandalism. Joeyconnick ( talk) 09:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: persistent block evasion. ― Jochem van Hees ( talk) 11:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP edits due to recent events, including pagemove due to proclaimed name (and religion) change of the subject from Syed Waseem Rizvi to Jitendra Narayan Singh Tyagi. Further discussion per MOS:IDENTITY may be required in this case before major edits. Arceus775 ( talk) 19:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP's vandalism in a recent conflict area. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 20:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: 117.230.6.193 this anonymous IP user is a version of same kind 223.228.162.27 has been continuously making disruptive editing and vandalism by change the lead roles and adding supporting character as a lead of the movie. According to the film hierarchy there are already in right and proper lead characters list. But they try to make it in their own way by adding some supporting character as a lead in the the film description daily. Please block that vandalism maker immediately from that page and stop all further disruptive editing or protect the page DineshanMani ( talk) 22:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by the same user using multiple ID's 117.230.161.165, 223.228.162.27, 117.230.183.177, 27.63.197.221. They kept change the lead actors name with supporting actresses even after being reverted to the proper list of lead cast. Kindly take immediate measures. Protection needed for the page DineshanMani ( talk) 00:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Israel-Palestine ECP restrictions should apply to this article. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – COI editing by IPs and new accounts and general lead disruptions by IPs. Gotitbro ( talk) 19:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Pro-fringe editing from IPs. Kleinpecan ( talk) 05:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from anti-vaccine & Covid-denial advocates MrEarlGray ( talk) 23:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding the word "alleged" without providing a source. After being reverted, they kept citing fake sources that fail verification and lack book titles. They also did not respond to my comment [19] and warning. Wiqi (55) 09:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page has the higher risk of Vandalism. Please protect it before 2025. Mon Mon Kyaw 96 ( talk) 10:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Or a range block. Persistent BLP violations from that 2a02 range. (CC) Tbhotch 18:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The user Jaszen is driving me up a wall with a poorly structured original research paragraph insisting that Tom Hardy's Bane from The Dark Knight Rises is considered "one of the greatest film villains of all time" based on his inclusions within some rankings from Empire and Ranker. I have explained to them ad nauseam that far more sourcing from far stronger sources is required in order to make such a bold statement about the character and that Hardy's Bane simply lacks the same type of cultural attention from the film industry that the likes of Josh Brolin's Thanos or Heath Ledger's Joker received that merits claims like those. The user in question will not listen to reason. Lutesque ( talk) 21:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 13:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Page was protected for 3 months (and also protected for shorter periods before), when protection ended, vandalism resumed. Abudabanas ( talk) 13:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge amount of ip user removing content. See diffs for evidence. Itcouldbepossible ( Talk) ( Contributions) ( Log) 15:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent Edit warring on page You'vegotmail27 TALK 16:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism, vandalism resumed after the previous protection template expired, users have been blocked, new ones are at it again. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 16:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP pushing an unknown (self-invented??) new name for the archipelago. A three day protection proved to be insufficient. The Banner  talk 00:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Special:Contributions/2600:1700:200:84C0:0:0:0:0/64 keeps adding unreferenced future stuff, and counting bootlegs as official albums. Binksternet ( talk) 00:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. I've seen several different IP's all within the last 1-3 hours. Please protect this article as soon as possible. Thanks! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 01:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: A bunch of IP address (that may all be the same person) over the past few weeks have been trying to change the article to remove the well sourced statement that the subject is a trans man. The IPs have become even more active over the past few days. The timing of all these IP edits seems to coincide with the publication of the book The Hidden Case of Ewan Forbes that is an additional academic publication to the sources already in the article specifically covering the background of the subject and him being a trans man. Silver seren C 01:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing, three or more users vandalizing Lucas Yan. Severestorm28 ( talk) 02:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User thinks the show is not a spin-off of Inspector Gadget. It was bad enough already that he/she thought My Little Pony: The Movie (2017) wasn't canon to Friendship Is Magic. FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 03:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Eleni Gabre-Madhin is a living person, and the page referenced is experiencing a high level of vandalism. Ethiopia is currently in a civil war and there is terrible societal tension. As you can see, she is a public figure, with a highly visible profile. In recent days, she has been caught up in the crossfire in a massive social media negative campaign which defamatory attacks and false allegations against her which started on Nov 24. Since then, as you can see, her page has suddenly received many more views and also editors have been acting in a vandalistic manner by removing positive content and adding very negative and biased content that portrays her as someone plotting to overthrow the government etc, which is based on false accusations. The content is extremely damaging to her and not factual or substantiated at all, with a major impact on her international reputation and employment. Even sources referenced in recent edits are slanderous and made with malicious intent. Without exaggeration, she is even worried for my personal safety and of my family. I would request that you provide her full protection against vandalistic attacks for her page for the time being, and also the right to assign an admin to edit content based on factual and documented content. Various people have tried to delete the negative content but it keeps getting reversed. Any help would be really appreciated. If needed, you can reach me at yraswork@yahoo.com if any questions. Thank you. 2601:14F:4403:38DD:3842:EDFB:9C1E:283B ( talk) 04:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: As the series starts tomorrow, there are so many IP edits without sourcing. For the last 5 days, there was additions about 5th test venue which is yet TBA. So, protection is needed from 8th December 2021 to 18 January 2022, end of the series. Kirubar ( talk) 04:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 05:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion using a static IP and a new account Nhatminhle817 ( NhatMinh1701). — MarkH21 talk 05:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pinging Ymblanter: this is the same IP that was at the Hanoi article recently until you semi-protected it for 3 weeks. — MarkH21 talk 06:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Link spamming socks who revert their own edits right after they made them. Same issue like at Bag. – NJD-DE ( talk) 08:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And Bag, strange. Johnuniq ( talk) 08:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Possible vandalism motivated by market manipulation. Motivation behind these edits is likely to be Reddit post critical of Tether coin with opinion based sources. Please could an admit protect this page temporarily and/or until these allegations are properly researched, or of course take any action you feel is appropriate.

Reddit thread in question: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/r9fni8/tether_usdt_created_1500000000_worth_of_usdt_out/

I have no personal or professional interest in Tether coin. ThePastoral ( talk) 17:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, I left a message at the user's talk. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs attempting unexplained removal of the same content for months. SpinningCeres ( talk) 23:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 10:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This is the tour article of the above mentioned 2021–22 Ashes series. As the series starts tomorrow, there are so many IP edits without sourcing. For the last 5 days, there was additions about 5th test venue which is yet TBA. So, protection is needed from 8th December 2021 to 18 January 2022, end of the series. Kirubar ( talk) 04:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – every single IP edit ever on this site was disruptive. FMSky ( talk) 06:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism is too infrequent to warrant protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Ferien ( talk) 08:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probably a topic in some school somewhere... Lectonar ( talk) 10:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 22:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent disruptive editing. User keeps ignoring sources and keeps making repetitive and redundant edits that disrupts the flow of the article. [20] [21] [22]. His edits are poor quality and unnecessary because they are removing key chronological events about the usage of the name in the 16th century and he is insistent on repeating a claim that is literally in the next sentence, disrupting the chronological flow of the article and making it a worse read. His edit: "Traditionally used by the Hindu Kshatriya community, it eventually became a common surname adopted by different communities including Rajputs and Sikhs.[1][2][3][4] It was later mandated in the late 17th century by Guru Gobind Singh (born Gobind Rai) for all male Sikhs as well, in part as a rejection of caste-based prejudice.[5][6] It has also been adopted by several castes and communities. As a surname or a middle name, it is now found throughout the world across communities and religious groups, becoming more of a title than a surname.[7]" -- Why repeat the same claims in one sentence when the next two sentences say and expound on the same exact thing? He's removing sourced claims that Singh was a Rajput suffix in the 16th century despite [23] and [24] (page 443) stating that "As a Rajput suffix, Singh only appears to have come into general usage by the 16th century". [25] "Singh began to gradually replace "Varma" by the 16th century among Rajputs.

Update: Disruptive user has admitted that Singh is indeed a 16th century Rajput surname. However, he keeps insisting that his repitive and redundant edits should stay. Keeps editing the page, keeps making it unnecessarily long. His current edit: "Singh seems to have come into general usage by the 16th century among the Rajputs"- seems unable to properly construct a sentence. Second sentence in lead para too similar to last sentence in para. Suthasianhistorian8 ( talk) 06:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 10:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 09:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content (typically by IP users). A source provided (an interview from Vogue with Kattan herself) mentions her husbands being "American-Colombian" or of Colombian heritage, but users have kept on changing his ethnic background without providing any acceptable/reliable third-party sources. Clear Looking Glass ( talk) 10:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 12:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

information Note: This is not just one single IP persistently adding unsourced content hence blocking just one of them is useless. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 12:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Paper9oll: In looking at a couple of the IP edits, it's hard for someone like me to understand what the problem is. For example, you reverted an IP saying there was no reliable source but the edit contains five URLs (two of which were archive.org) and looking at the variety.com one seemed to verify the text. There is nothing relevant on article talk. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Johnuniq Apologies for the unclear note, the 2 references is inside the Efn template, and is for explaning what Spotify Awards is about. Whereas, the actual award/category "Spotify RADAR Korea Top 5 Artist" that is no references provided for that. The references inside the Efn template also doesn't support the award/category mentioned in earlier sentence as both are failed verification. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 07:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Afaics, this is essentially IP 103.xxx....and they have been warned already. We don't protect a page to keep one IP away. Lectonar ( talk) 10:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregistered editors are removing the maintenance templates from the article without consensus or discussion. Request that this time they be applied for a month or so. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SangrurUser ( talk) 08:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. INDT ( talk) 09:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Possible vandalism due to fan-base war of the esports team. Yamete1111 ( talk) 09:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistant vandalism and minor edit warring. DirkJandeGeer ( щи) 11:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by IP's address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired. Thalialioo ( talk) 12:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs generally creating hoaxes. CruzRamiss2002 ( talk) 13:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: because i need to change this to a article for acting purposes Kaden Robbins ( talk) 02:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It was never protected. You seem to be editing it just fine-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 04:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not done Not separately protected, user can edit at will. Lectonar ( talk) 10:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and persistent vandalism – because new incoming German coalition cabinet, with recent events happening with ministers and ministries. FellowMellow ( talk) 20:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined thereis a lot of editing there, not all of it helpful, but I don't think semi would be much help. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 21:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by IP's address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired. Thalialioo ( talk) 12:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by IP's address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired. Thalialioo ( talk) 12:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism, disruptive editing, and addition of false, unsourced content by IPs. Colonestarrice ( talk) 12:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits keep happening two days after a game that didn't go so hot. I get it, things happen. But can we calm BOTH Jets and Leafs fans down for a little bit by locking this down?. Mandoli ( talk) 13:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address with various range keeps edit warring the lead for some weird reason. Second Skin ( talk) 14:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 18:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This article has a long history of vandalism and repeated protection. clpo13( talk) 18:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated addition of the same WP:OR by two different IP (one located in Ontario, the other in California) D.Lazard ( talk) 18:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP vandals today. Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 19:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus ( talk) 20:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 20:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP-hopping vandalism, OR. Kbabej ( talk) 21:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:SPAs running afoul of WP:NONAZIS. tgeorgescu ( talk) 22:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator CorbieVreccan. 6 months ago, as a matter of fact. Favonian ( talk) 22:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

08 December 2021

Reason: Lots of vandalism both from IP addresses and vandal accounts. Temp 30/500 protection would suffice. Pyramids09 ( talk) 19:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not eligible for ECP. Have blocked the vandal-only account, outside that it looks like just an occasional IP vandal. Please re-report if this changes. -- Euryalus ( talk) 20:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Curbon7 ( talk) 22:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As discussion is continuing on the talk page, let that play out first. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly vandalisms from rival fans. A brief reprieve until Canadian football season is over seems in order. Ifnord ( talk) 23:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is targeted by an IP by blanking. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 23:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 00:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure what happened there. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetery from multiple IP addresses putting the island in Singapore. (It's not.) Likely ineedtostopforgetting. Seloloving ( talk) 00:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You are being deceiving over the reasons to protect the page. It is NOT written that the island is IN Singapore. Please look at the diffs presented. The edits are not vandalism or made by malicious IPs. I can't control when dynamic IPs change. There are unique circumstances surrounding the island; it is an island whereby the land it sits upon is owned by Malaysia, while the lighthouse and its surrounding structures are owned by Singapore.
It may seem confusing to anyone not living in the region, but here's a source that talks more about it - Singapore Lighthouse on a Malaysian Island, do note however that it is a Malaysian source and may not be that impartial. Still, the source even added "Malaysia, in a way, has yet to have full sovereignty over Pulau Pisang." 58.142.181.108 ( talk) 00:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Sock selectively pushes pov, from the same article - In 2003, the then minister for foreign affairs of Singapore, Professor S. Jayakumar, mentioned to the republic’s parliament that the sovereignty over Pulau Pisang is with Malaysia.. While this seems like a content dispute, this is disruptive pushing pov by sock. -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 01:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetery from multiple IP addresses putting the island in Singapore. (It's not.) Likely ineedtostopforgetting. Seloloving ( talk) 00:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I have provided my reasons above.
Same issue as per Pulau Pisang (Johor) section above -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 01:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP editor is repeatedly adding sales information based on the lead of Japanese playtest/review, not on any official sales numbers or interviews with game staff. ProtoDrake ( talk) 00:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I see you are discussing the issue with the user, and hopefully they will stop. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant vandalism by ip user MrHerii ( talk) 04:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki ( talk) 05:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extended semi: Persistent edit war between an IP and a series of new accounts (presumably related). CMD ( talk) 15:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Please request this article to create wiki extended protected page because many edittor can cause disruptive editing including Bipin Rawat's death update. Abhiraj Mohan 31 ( talk) 10:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for 3 days, the page will continue to be pending-changes protected after that. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 11:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Current high level of IP vandalism. Additionally; as the Formula 1 championship reaches its conclusion on Sunday further vandalism will be likely, regardless of the outcome. So the protection should last until Tuesday next week at minimum. DragonFury ( talk) 13:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 13:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC): Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Anarchyte ( talk) 13:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism. If possible, could the page be protected for at least two weeks, by when the season will have finished. If semi protection is denied, can pending changes at least be re-instated. SSSB ( talk) 08:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Semi-protected for 2 months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Rawat was involved in a helicopter crash today, resulting in rumours of his death. Multiple IPs and new editors are rushing to write about his supposed death, though no RS has yet reported it. Pending changes is unlikely to be enough due to the incoming wave of disruptive editing and BLP violations. Java Hurricane 08:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Semi-protected for 3 days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Athlete page getting high level of vandalism, probably needs to be protected for a few months or so. TylerBurden ( talk) 08:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sudden attacks from multip[le IPs making mass of unexplained deletions, unsourced additions + deleting unsourced template - Arjayay ( talk) 13:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits over the past few days have been nothing but blatant vandalism due to attention from the recent OverSimplified video on the topic. Doesn't seem like it will stop anytime soon. SuperSkaterDude45 ( talk) 14:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

"Want to edit awards and nominations category" Stolenheartrra ( talk) 08:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: From the OP's (short) editing history, I conclude that the article in question is Rrahul Sudhir. Request changed accordingly. Favonian ( talk) 11:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not done – OP is now auto-confirmed and has edited the article. Favonian ( talk) 11:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vacant0 ( talk) 20:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 ( talk) 21:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see no recent vandalism. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The vandalism on the article warranted temporary protection, not permanent, and the dispute there has also died down. 2804:248:F68F:F500:1DF:B294:6CB:5D6B ( talk) 04:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Fuzheado: Lectonar ( talk) 10:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: The IP range 2804:248:c000::/34 has failed to get talk page consensus for certain changes to the Franco article. They have tried repeatedly ( 3 times in October) to have the semi-protection removed, which I can only interpret as a declaration of intent to edit-war. Favonian ( talk) 16:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism. please protect this page. so that no one can delete or edit as of now. it's currently under edit phase, I don't want other editors to judge or interfere with my page. Kindly help Aqzswxdecfrvgtb ( talk) 10:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

There is no vandalism, paid user Aqzswxdecfrvgtb is repeatedly re-creating article after this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar Sharma, should probably be salted. Theroadislong ( talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined Declining the protection request; I have salted the article. Lectonar ( talk) 13:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Requester also blocked as time-wasting SPA. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs or new accounts (possibly created by the subject) keep removing sourced allegations. Seasider53 ( talk) 12:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AntonSamuel ( talk) 15:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disturbing IP vandalism making statements glorifying the murder of communists and claiming communists "aren't real people" in addition to some run-of-the-mill IP vandalism blanking cited sections. Simonm223 ( talk) 15:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – robertsky ( talk) 16:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 02:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar ( talk) 14:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. For some reason this unused template has attracted the attention of an LTA, who has repeatedly vandalised it under various IPs and a now globally locked account. 163.1.15.238 ( talk) 15:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection and indefinite full move protection, and while you're there, please also change the content model to JSON. See User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2021/December#DatBot feature request. This is to be a bot configuration page, but some non-admins need to edit it. Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 20:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Cool idea, thank you! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Woodroar ( talk) 17:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 18:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 18:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

09 December 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 19:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet ( talk) 22:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I was reading the Urban Dictionary article and noticed that on Application, other, on the Duterte section is that theirs's no citation and would like to request someone to add a citation using this or something else. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/08/21/1945196/palace-disputes-na-duterte-urban-dictionary-entry Randomuserontheinter ( talk) 04:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP users. Page was already semi-protected for a month in September but after the protection expired, the IP vandals returned. So I suggest a longer or permanent semi-protection. Spike ( talk) 09:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. CptViraj ( talk) 15:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP user adding nonsense and refusing to discuss. EEBuchanan ( talk) 19:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: high ip vandalism anchoritium, the reverter / talk / contribs / 22:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by fans of the anime series Bungou Stray Dogs. His spouse has been changed to Dazai Osamu numerous times in the past month alone. Ksbgworks ( talk) 08:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant, ongoing disruptive editing from an IP address user for about a month and now another one has joined them. At the very least, can these two lose their access to editing this page? I also gave IP user 140 a warning on their talk page. Mmrh1 ( talk) 19:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Barbados#Music

Change #music after the following sentence "In 2009 she was appointed as an Honorary Ambassador of Youth and Culture for Barbados by the late Prime Minister, David Thompson.[136]" to now also include the new sentence "In 2021 she was named as the 11th National Hero of Barbados. [1]" Shntnyshly ( talk) 16:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

References

Not done Please make this request on Talk:Barbados. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kaiju Geek ( talk) 20:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 01:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by an IP who doesn't stop dispute being reverted. They clearly wait until the next month after the revert to do it again so they don't appear to be edit warring. [26] [27] [28] [29] LittleJerry ( talk) 00:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 01:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: As the subject is getting married and there is increasing interest in the article. Edit requests at the talk page are not being taken up readily. The article was indefinite protected in 2013 and it is very possible that the situation is different now, and this is a good time to test that out. Jay (talk) 15:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Comment: There were two of the same request made within an hour, in just a few hours ago. You can’t say they’re not being readily taken up when you haven’t given anyone a proper chance-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 18:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I would like to add that Edit requests not being taken up, was weakest of my reasons. And I referred to Talk:Katrina Kaif#Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2021 where the IP provided multiple RS 2 days back. Jay (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected While I'm sympathetic to the fact that the article has been protected for 8+ years straight, there appears to already be enough chaos at this article just with the editors that can edit through protection. Considering she's about to get married, this would be about the worst time to unprotect the article. Maybe in a few months, when the marriage stuff dies down. However, it's likely that vandalism will quickly return, and the article will go back to being protected. It's not that hard to edit a semi-protected article. You just need an account that is 4+ days old and has made 10 edits. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It should be a redirect to Homemade chemical bomb or at least to Improvised explosive device. -- Barecode ( talk) 11:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This is not the page to make that argument; ask at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories instead. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this person is not that known ....... . 2405:201:1C:6054:8920:679:93C4:5FE7 ( talk) 13:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This is not a valid justification to lower protection. If anything, your post here is likely damaging to your case given the page was protected over BLP concerns. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – People are joining Wikipedia just for a particular edit in this page. They are joining for targeting. Jogesh 69 ( talk) 16:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This seems more like an argument for extended-confirmed protection, not CRASHlock. High volume of edits (such as we might see with a concerted off-wiki campaign) contraindicates CRASHlock. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Yeah this definitely sounds like an argument for increased protection-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 20:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not done —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Patriot Front held a demonstration in Washington D.C. on Saturday, December 4 2021. The group marched to the Lincoln Memorial carrying a banner which read, "reclaim America." [1] Jeremy.dorrough ( talk) 19:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done Unclear request. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Let's make this new template the same as others in the series Template:Portal-inline. Moxy- 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 387 transclusions, already semi-protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 00:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information and rewording to make it sound like the website actually tracks Santa. This is probably just going to increase as Christmas approaches. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 02:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I user has been blocked. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing, the IPs keeps adding In development back and adding the Undated films as untitled Jumanji sequel NSAandGCHQ ( talk) 03:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Some IP editors have made a lot of changes that do not confirm to Wikipedia’s policies. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Some IP editors have made a lot of changes that do not confirm to Wikipedia’s policies. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The celebrity in question has become a source of controversy for a recent interview, leading to a lot of trolls vandalising his page to express their disapproval, and fans defending him by fangirling on his Wikipedia page. Could someone please look into this?. Aakansha Trivedi ( talk) 05:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High IP vandalism. Semi-protection would sufice. Pyramids09 ( talk) 18:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: im not seeing high levels of IP-Vandalism here, could you provide some diffs to point out what I've missed Amortias ( T)( C) 22:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see much editing, but at least over 70% of IP edits can be considered non-disruptive. Lectonar ( talk) 08:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Vandalism and BLP violation by IP. Article is on Wikipedia Mainpage Venkat TL ( talk) 05:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: It's my page. Invbff ( talk) 08:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Base user pages are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users. Also there has been no disruption. Full protection would mean that you couldn't edit your userpage yourself. Lectonar ( talk) 08:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs keep adding false information in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 06:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated target of a sockpuppeteer. Blake Gripling ( talk) 13:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary by the parents of these obviously pampered children, because they, the authors are currently beening charged and soon convicted of the following daily crimes of:" rape, kidnapping, home invasion exploritory surgery, mayham, manslaughter, slavery, torture, fraud, using false identity as police officers, grand theft , grand theft person, auto burglery, attempted murder, murder both pre-meditated ,character assassination, terrorism, traitorist acts against the united states, human rights to privacy violations, ..... . 2600:8801:2019:BE00:5498:CD66:40C9:1EF5 ( talk) 08:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar ( talk) 08:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism from anonymous editors Barry Wom ( talk) 10:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: My page. Invbff ( talk) 14:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done We don't protect user or talk pages unless there's a good reason to. Please read the instructions at the top of this page before posting here again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people have a right to write about the subject

Declined – The page has been protected three weeks due to unsourced changes from IPs. In my opinion the protection is valid and useful. Consider making an WP:Edit request on the article talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Someone is attempting to get themselves mentioned in this article, and it's resulting in incorrect information remaining on the article. All the suspect edits are coming from IP addresses, and it's requested that the article be moved to Semi protection for a limited period to try and quell this editor and the misinformation they're adding. Dane| Geld 10:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Several IP users are changing the original result as per their own wishes. Diptyajit ( talk) 14:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High and consistent level of IP vandalism. User has been reverted several times from different editors, and refuses to listen or discuss, instead choosing to attack and insult. – Rhain 15:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 18:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As per Kyle Larson; long-term history of anonymous editors attempting to right great wrongs in the form of vandalism. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" 18:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 18:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 08:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Less Unless ( talk) 09:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not particularly high-intensity but nonetheless persistent IP vandalism. –  Arms & Hearts ( talk) 18:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The anniversary of this sad day - December 14 - is coming up, I think it would be wise/prudent to increase this article's protection from near the anniversary date - from say December 13 until maybe December 15. There's always a flurry of vandalism/trolling around disaster/mass-murder/mass-killing anniversary dates. It is listed as being Eligible on the Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 14 page. Shearonink ( talk) 20:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Shearonink: the article appears to already be indefinitely semi-protected. Firefangledfeathers 20:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply
This is the decrease page not the increase-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 22:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. This page was indefinitely semi-protected due to vandalism, but that protection was accidentally removed in a delete and restore that occurred earlier today. 192.76.8.80 ( talk) 00:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP vandalism. If possible please RevDel the edits made by IPs today per RevDel#2. Eevee01( talk) 12:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unrelated nonsense. A rangeblock might also do the trick but I'm not familiar with those. DanCherek ( talk) 13:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Mass of IPs adding false financial figures + false review summaries Arjayay ( talk) 16:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

10 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 22:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article redirected through AfD process. Onel5969 TT me 20:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over a period of three days, an IP user has been repeatedly tagging this a "good article" without the article having gone through the good article process. Largoplazo ( talk) 20:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – excessive vandalism by new users. Stang 17:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent section blanking by IP users. KaitoNkmra23 (talk!) 21:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent section blanking by IP users. KaitoNkmra23 (talk!) 21:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent section blanking by IP users. KaitoNkmra23 (talk!) 21:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The article is misleading. This is an accredited university in Kerala. I would like to expand this article with good sources. Suhail Chemmad ( talk) 11:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected The protection only lasts a few more days. Request edits on the talk page until it expires. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.  LeoFrank  Talk 13:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of copyright violations and additions of unsourced material. DanCherek ( talk) 13:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN ( talk) 02:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  LeoFrank  Talk 15:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. (semi, 1 month) Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 03:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, it has a long history of simmering petty vandalism but is hit by an IP-hopper today. Ifnord ( talk) 22:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. (1 month) Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 03:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP user repeatedly making POV edits and doesn't engage constructively on talk. Repeatedly reverts content before attempting to discuss on talk. China–Lithuania relations was protected for similar edits by same IP user. DrIdiot ( talk) 13:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined. This appears to be an issue with just one user, for which we do not protect an article. User issues are dealt with at ANI or similar location, if they are severe or persistent enough. I do note that some of this user's edits appear to be constructive, which complicates the situation.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zander251 ( talk) 03:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additions of death date by multiple editors, probable hoax. Even if not a hoax, protection likely needed for a time. General Ization Talk 03:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High frequency of disruptive editing by IP users regarding pronouns. ~ BappleBusiness [talk] 14:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Many IP editors are adding information from unreliable sources or without sources. Sariel Xilo ( talk) 17:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive and unreferenced edits from an IP user TheHotwiki ( talk) 23:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of doubtful unsourced information that the show is ending or has ended/been cancelled. The Grand Delusion( Send a message) 22:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by IP editor. SPI exists at: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/47.55.50.49.   Aloha27  talk  00:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by IP editor. SPI exists at: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/47.55.50.49.   Aloha27  talk  00:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding birthdate information without sources. DonIago ( talk) 01:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP edits which are unexplained and of questionable faith for about 3 months, with some content often reverted by experienced editors. Edits are also minor but repetitive, causing the history log to be filled with IP edits Marcnut1996 ( talk) 22:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 00:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 05:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – George reeves person. Nigos ( t c) 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 09:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly everything since protection expired in May has been vandalism. Requesting long-term (>1 year) or indefinite protection. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 03:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. – Content is regularly blanked or whitewashed. JellyMan9001 ( talk) 06:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 09:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending changes protection: IPs make up about half the edits to this article at the moment. Some contributions are constructive, such as [30] [31], while others are clearly not. Seems a good fit for PCR protection. YttriumShrew ( talk) 06:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editor outwaited the semi protection again. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_harassment_by_disruptive_Hong_Kong_IP. Citobun ( talk) 07:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: My page. Invbff ( talk) 06:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined @ Invbff:: declined for the 3rd time; please be so kind as to read our protection policy if you have not done so already. Your repeated requests are beginning to become disruptive. Lectonar ( talk) 08:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incorrect changes. People keep adding their prefered Champion despite the Champion not being decided until Sunday. SSSB ( talk) 10:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Usual vandalism/partizan edits from multiple IPs resumed on expiry of latest block - long block history, suggest permanent semi-protection - Arjayay ( talk) 11:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Been vandalized most months this year, and otherwise not received many edits lately. Low but persistent level. DemonDays64 ( talk) 05:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One or two problematic edits per month is not enough to warrant protecting the article. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer  Talk 11:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 12:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of Vandalism Malayalee0121 ( talk) 14:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. By me. El_C 15:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I posted a request for Acid bomb on Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Current_requests_for_reduction_in_protection_level and I was sent to. Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories. I posted my request there and I was sent here. My request is to unprotect the page so I can make the redirect to Improvised explosive device - OR - someone to create that redirect. Please try to solve this instead of sending me again to another page. Makes me dizzy. Thanks. Barecode ( talk) 07:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) Barecode ( talk) 07:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotected per WP:NO-PREEMPT. @ Barecode: feel free to make the redirect. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Redirected. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 03:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: People editing the text and removing important points. Adoreabhi ( talk) 13:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done I suggest you heed the suggestions and edits of experienced reviewers. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruption by IP hopper, probably User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 ( talk) 15:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 17:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 16:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs edit warring over Jerry's real name. Minkai( rawr!)( see where I screwed up) 16:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Askarion 💬✒️ 16:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Must be a recent game, a bunch of silly IP and newly created account vandalisms. Ifnord ( talk) 17:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: Talk page of highly-visible template. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined First of all, the linked page is a redirect to a talk page. Neither the redirect or the actual talk page have any significant history of disruption. Second of all, talk pages of templates are not protected without reason, and are never template-protected. Please try to learn more about protection policies before requesting page protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IP/new users. Ab207 ( talk) 12:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian ( talk) 20:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP users. PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 22:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

11 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive IP editor (see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_harassment_by_disruptive_Hong_Kong_IP). Citobun ( talk) 12:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism reverted ~6 times yesterday and has started today under a different IP. MB 14:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Since previous page protection expired, IPs adding "public servant" to the lead returned, e.g. [32], [33], [34], and an IP added e.g. poorly sourced [35], [36] and copyvio material [37], before an IP again added "public servant" to the lead [38], [39]. On the Talk page of the article, I participated in discussion of some of the material added by an IP, and had not reviewed all of it before an admin removed copyvio. Beccaynr ( talk) 14:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been high level of IP Vandalism again. 6 incidents in the past 30 days. Requesting SemiProtected level please. ImAbetastico ( talk) 19:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems like a good candidate for pending changes protection, let's try it out for a while. Let me know if it's not working. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nemov ( talk) 19:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently her name has come up at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and IPs are adding unsourced claims here. General Ization Talk 20:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 22:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 23:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 15:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Maxtheewolfe ( talk) 15:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC) Support: edit warring among various IPs, adding and removing ~8.5kbyte of content including references. (I have tried to fix the formatting problem reported by Cyberbot I below.) -- Mirokado ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed within hours after the previous protection expired less than two weeks ago; has continued at a fairly steady pace since then. Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 16:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism magnet. FDW777 ( talk) 20:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upgrade from pending changes to semi-protection. Long-term disruption. — Czello 22:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left the PC protection in place so that it'll still be there when this semi-protection expires. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An IP editor claims that Tara Strong is set to voice Lola Bunny next year, but fails to provide a reliable source to confirm this. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 18:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous Sockpuppetry by an LTA. [40] [41] [42] SsSsSs0909 ( talk) 19:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous Sockpuppetry by an LTA. [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] 193.228.97.71 contributed on December 10, 2021 is an Austrian IP suspected of being the LTA. [49] [50] SsSsSs0909 ( talk) 19:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous Sockpuppetry by an LTA. [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] 193.228.97.71 contributed on December 10, 2021 is an Austrian IP suspected of being the LTA. [61] [62] SsSsSs0909 ( talk) 19:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruption. KidAdSPEAK 23:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent POV edits violating BLP for the last couple of days. Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD08:72C0:8D5B:14BE:7B52:6F5A ( talk) 22:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ) 23:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated ip vandalism. 72.95.130.181 ( talk) 07:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protection - Targeted by socks of the Anshuman Tiwari Official spamfarm. Their primary target, Anshuman, is already protected and their MO involves article hijacking. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 11:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More of the usual. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 03:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian ( talk) 12:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP disruption. VR talk 05:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption and socking after the last ECP expired. - SUN EYE 1 06:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Starting with semi. El_C 13:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An IP editor known as 68.131.33.163 claims that Bill Farmer is still currently voicing Sylvester the Cat but he hasn’t done so since 1996. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 06:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Mako001 ( talk) 10:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An IP editor known as 68.131.33.163 claims that Bill Farmer is still currently voicing Yosemite Sam, but he hasn’t done so since 1996. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 06:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Mako001 ( talk) 10:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An IP editor known as 68.131.33.163 claims that Bill Farmer is still currently voicing Foghorn Leghorn, but he hasn’t reportedly done so since 2008. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 06:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Mako001 ( talk) 10:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous Sockpuppetry by an LTA. [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] 193.228.97.71 contributed on December 10, 2021 is an Austrian IP suspected of being the LTA. [70] [71] SsSsSs0909 ( talk) 20:17, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 14:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi-protection evidently wasn't enough given this disruption from an auto-confirmed user. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 20:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 14:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user added false information on the article. HurricaneEdgar 21:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Re-filing this request since it's now multiple IP users (though suspected to be a single user) repeatedly making large-scale POV edits, do not engage constructively on talk. Repeatedly reverts content before attempting to discuss on talk (see Talk:Lithuania–Taiwan relations). China–Lithuania relations was protected for similar edits by IP user. Seems to be a different IP address every day (up to 3 so far).

The edits are sometimes constructive but this user simply does not engage constructively. See the latest exchange on talk for example. DrIdiot ( talk) 00:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: So uh yeah… people are upset at her new rules as governor and are vandalizing the article saying things like “totalitarian” governor. I’m requesting semi-protection (preferably until her term ends). Trillfendi ( talk) 21:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by IP user. Sricsi ( talk) 21:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by IP user. Sricsi ( talk) 21:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by IP user. Sricsi ( talk) 21:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing apparent WP:COI editing by various IP addresses. Semiprotection should be plenty for now. This has been a problem at MacKeeper for years, so I request a long duration. Adoring nanny ( talk) 01:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ashwin Kumar Lakshmikanthan is being trolled relentlessly for a recent speech he made. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism through socks, /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PaullyMatthews blocked today again, after another was blocked on 6th december. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 03:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – We've seen too much of the repeated disruption by socks of Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 14:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, I would like to add few more sources to the Stub to improve the submission. This is related to his deepening the Strasberg Method and it comes from Rivista del cinematografo [ it and this is a printed source related to Method acting published by Dino Audino Editore [ it, this and thisshould verify his practice as an artist. Anyone can help? Thanks-- Submarine00 ( talk) 22:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)}} reply

@ Submarine00: This page isn't protected. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 03:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Tol: What would you recommend in order to ask someone to edit the page before review?-- Submarine00 ( talk) 17:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Submarine00: You could try asking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 19:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppety by sockmaster "Araxes TheThief" and his IP socks (See also; [72] - [73]) -. LouisAragon ( talk) 22:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User is also blocked Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Rusalkii ( talk) 04:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: History of persistent vandalism by IPs. Vandalism started up again right after temporary semi-protection expired. Was granted a week last May and one month in November. I think it's the subject matter that is drawing the attacks. Make them create an account (which they never do). I'm tired of keeping this article on my watchlist just to monitor for vandalism. Make it indefinite semi-protection. Platonk ( talk) 05:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs keep making test edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 07:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA: Nabasile. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nabasile. Amaury07:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism by N.A.Khoan 27.61.70.38 ( talk) 08:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB ( talk) 09:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Page has "Template Protected" template but isn't protected. Another small oversight?. Mako001 ( talk) 10:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 14:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism from a WMF-banned editor. -- Ferien ( talk) 13:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD08:4E91:BDB9:703D:CE31:547D ( talk) 14:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD08:4E91:7087:F9B5:CA3B:CB7D ( talk) 14:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Long-term edit dispute about some more 'Epstein once talked to this guy who has an interest in the company and that dude now needs to rot in prison' nonsense that has been the province of two accounts ( GRADYA&M76 ( talk · contribs) and Wikimoto123 ( talk · contribs)) that are fighting in edit comments, with only one actual user talk page comment between them. Most importantly, that dispute has nothing to do with the company or its officers or employees in the least. Both SPAs on this article with no other contribs outside it. Nate ( chatter) 22:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Erm, wouldn't just ECP be enough? Or am I missing something? However that would be assuming that protection is the best choice here. Whilst both SPA's are somewhat disruptive, we need to WP:AGF here. I've given Wikimoto123 ( talk · contribs) a COI warning too. If both go any further, the individual users can be taken to ANI or the COI noticeboard. This would probably be better than fully protecting this page, no matter how vexatious these two's behaviour is. Just my thoughts? Mako001 ( talk) 10:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not done, for now. Indeed, WP:ECP would be enough. With warnings and notices issued today, the last edits from the two users were on Dec 9, so this is a wait-and-see thing now. El_C 14:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi protection: Disruptive editing at infobox. Beshogur ( talk) 01:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done — the user has made no further edits to the page after they were warned about edit warring. El_C 13:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Regular trash edits. JaggaDaaku ( talk) 02:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: JaggaDaaku, did you link to the right page? The target has a total of 1 edit. El_C 14:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP imitating a blocked user on talk page and another IP (I think the same person) making disruptive edits in the article itself. The IPs have been blocked, but the suspected person behind the IPs has a history of using a range of IPs for disruption. VR talk 05:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done, for now. Already range blocked, so a bit preemptive at this stage. Feel free to drop me a line if they do end up using a new range. El_C 13:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Page has "Template Protected" template but isn't protected. Small oversight?. Mako001 ( talk) 10:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 14:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ The Alternate Mako and El C: It has the "Template Protected" template so that the correct message shows up when the documentation is transcluded at Module:Portal. Template/Module documentation sub-pages don't usually need such a high level of protection. -- John of Reading ( talk) 14:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Oh right, John of Reading, I remember this happening before. Thanks, but I'm sure I'll forget all about that again (just give me 5). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ El_C 15:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Why isn't this considered an issue? I'm just interested to know, since another High visibility template was rendered unusable (or at least had some issues) for 3 hours after an IP replaced the documentation page with "templete". I really shouldn't say this (per wp:beans), but if I was to blank both documentation pages I have requested protection on here, wouldn't the templates become completely unusable? Possibly even altering the appearance of these templates? Mako001 ( talk) 15:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ The Alternate Mako: If you view the source of Template:Main, you'll see coding equivalent to <noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude>. The noinclude tags ensure that edits to Template:Main/doc won't affect any pages that use {{ Main}} - vandalism to Template:Main/doc might disrupt the appearance of the template page itself, but cannot upset any articles. -- John of Reading ( talk) 15:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Highly Visible Template. Qwerfjkl talk 12:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined. Current tprotection seems appropriate, not sure why you're asking to downgrade to ECP. El_C 14:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. regular edit warring by ano ip and newly created accounts Aeengath ( talk) 15:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Award ceremony just concluded a few hours ago (depending on time zone; event was on December 11). Multiple IPs (aka fans) couldn't accept the result and kept disruptive editing, this also happened couple of times when the ceremony was still broadcasting, when me and other editors are updating the article. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 17:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD08:6B90:D8A7:9C62:C081:7F26 ( talk) 17:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism and WP:KIDSTVDATES from IPs. Likely needs a good, long semi protection. wizzito | say hello! 20:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are repeatedly introducing information describing article subject as a child molester, as well as changing the article subject's name contrary to the sources cited in the article. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 20:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 20:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent tornado rating changes and content addition or removal by anon users that is disruptive to maintaining the article. United States Man ( talk) 20:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

12 December 2021

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content—Repeated edit warring and changing over conflicting announcements regarding his potential hiring by Oregon as head coach. At this time no announcement has come from either Oregon or Georgia, the latter being his current employer. Unfortified Castle 21:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 22:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations over several months by IP editors. Raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/45.59.206.114. Blocks unlikely to be effective, hence requesting a hefty stretch of semi-protection. Jack Frost ( talk) 00:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism DrBlackZ ( talk) 02:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many incorrect changes that need reverting. JMHamo ( talk) 22:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by 67.80.177.179 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). 140.213.15.207 ( talk) 00:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined IP blocked by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent vandalism of high-profile BLP PoliceSheep99 ( talk) 01:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Editor blocked indefinitely by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Such-change47 ( talk) 03:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 04:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
OMG, I used "BLP" for the reason ... confusion with a couple of football articles I've protected recently. Johnuniq ( talk) 04:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The recent edit history of this article shows many editors adding false or unreliable information onto it. Since the subject of the article is very well-known, the semi-protection that is on it seems not to have worked in overall prevention of these types of edits. Philosophy2 ( talk) 03:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have only been 4 edits in December in total. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors keep on editing Curry only. They don't complete updates of the table by not updating other players' records. Some only update the makes but don't update the attempts. I suggest protecting for a week as most probably, curry will break the record within that timespan. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 06:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced material. The Grand Delusion( Send a message) 03:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Long term temporary semi-protection: Long term and persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan ( talk) 06:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Death announced within the last hour ( [74]). Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 07:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not seeing any vandalism or BLP violations in recent edits to this page. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from someone writing 'bad college, steals money' etc on the page. After several warnings from one IP, another used. Vandalism likely to persist. Such-change47 ( talk) 09:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a nationalist fringe view. Jingiby ( talk) 07:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Potentially high level of vandalism especially during these times when historical revisionism is used to boost the campaign of a son of the former dictator. 182.18.238.95 ( talk) 08:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, pages are not protected pre-emptively-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Potentially high levels of vandalism due to the upcoming elections and blatant historical revisionism. 182.18.238.95 ( talk) 08:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, pages are not protected pre-emptively-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Also a highly controversial topic and under the gender DS, so should really be protected indefinitely IMO. Crossroads -talk- 06:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, subject has recently died. Fundude99 talk to me 15:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Usual major sports event vandalism. Benjamin112 15:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting an increase in protection temporarily - as with The Matrix Resurrections an IP keeps adding 'Matt Hinges' to the article despite consensus that there is no reliable source. The IP has ignored this and continued to edit the article. giftheck ( talk) 08:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: vandalism that occurs can take weeks to be fixed, which is dangerous 68.99.131.155 ( talk) 09:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Highly controversial decisions leading to inevitable vandalism. See here, here, here... HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 14:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 16:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 16:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism related to last race of 2021 Formula One World Championship, request for 1 day semi-protection. Diffs: diff, diff, diff. Santacruz Please ping me! 16:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Skjoldbro ( talk) 16:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Repeated Vandalism and Possible Sockpuppetry Zippy ( talk) 17:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC) 17:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. Logged DS action. El_C 18:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please consider short term semi-protection to discourage IP users from introducing content failing WP:NPOV and to help enforce relevant discretionary sanction. Melmann 17:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC). reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 18:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Still a pretty steady stream of spam added by IPs and fresh accounts. JBchrch talk 17:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 18:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High leve of IP vandalism - recent events. Night fury 18:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Continuing IP vandalism Ghmyrtle ( talk) 18:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The article is very biased and needs some additional citations. N1234567 ( talk) 16:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You added a pp-template to an unprotected page, together with a pov-tag without corresponding talkpage-thread diff, and now you're posting a request for additional citations at a page for requests for decreasing protection levels? You seem confused to me... Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Present your case at Talk:Aurangzeb. Favonian ( talk) 17:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: High level disruption by an ip user. Beshogur ( talk) 18:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please talk to the user, explain your point. Less Unless ( talk) 19:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP user (users?) attempting to remove claims that Ross was "elected" because he was not elected directly, but rather via a regional list. This is clearly untrue (Scotland uses the Additional Member System (a.k.a. MMP) to elect MSPs, and election via a regional list is commonplace) and represents an attempt to push a non-neutral point of view (delegitimising Ross by contesting the fact that he was "elected" to the Scottish Parliament). Akakievich ( talk) 19:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and vandalizing edits by multiple IP editors and one registered editor ( User:FairyLightsUp). Schazjmd  (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous vandalism after the last race's results. Claims of cheating, matchfixing, and race championship results that are being removed from the page because of disagreements(?) 77.166.95.128 ( talk) 21:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same edit has been inserted into the article by a user using multiple IP addresses. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 21:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs are making generally unconstructive edits to the article, the main one I'm seeing is adding Colleen O'Shaughnessey to starring and the lead when it has already been established that she should be excluded due to not being on the billing block. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

13 December 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Preventive measure against vandalism -- usual major sports event stuff. Benjamin112 14:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Surprisingly the page history doesn't seem to show any particular examples of vandalism. The FIA page has received some, but I can't see any examples at 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 15:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Update for administrator consideration - I was able to find one apparent test edit from yesterday and one example of obvious vandalism from several days ago by a now-blocked user. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 15:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Update for administrator consideration - Since I checked there has been some vandalism and some likely good faith but not particularly high-quality edits. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 15:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to re-request in a few hours if it picks up, but as it stands, there are IPs contributing useful information to the article and it would be unfair to prevent them from editing it. Anarchyte ( talk) 16:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Can I please request reconsideration? Vandalism from IPs are increasing due to there being some controversy over the race's result Singularity42 ( talk) 20:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. yeah that soon kicked off a bit. reconsideration reconsidered. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism, same pattern as other Formula 1-related BLPs seen above. Santacruz Please ping me! 19:06, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from IP (probably the owner of this recent blocked account) violating what WP:MOS-AM#Infobox states. Xexerss ( talk) 10:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 20:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism making the same or very similar edits. Anwegmann ( talk) 22:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – They're back at it again. Vandalism after the expiration of the previous page protection. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 01:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Four different IP'S have vandalized this article now with the exact same nonsense sentences. May well be a case of sock puppetry, but my sock puppetry investigation request has been denied. I just reverted another addition this morning. The sentences added are completely ungrammatical and also inaccurate. EEBuchanan ( talk) 11:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed immediately off last protect. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 06:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive and unsourced edits by IP users; e.g. addition of falsified/misrepresented sources. Mann Mann ( talk) 08:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by IP editors in the last 24 hours, with both an IPv4 user and an IPv6 user doing identical edits (possibly the same person). – WPA ( talk) 12:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Requesting for 1 month protection. His Indian fans have been trying to update the page that he is joining back his previous Indian club, NEUFC, having left his current club. However, there is a lack of sources on both. From the subject's Instagram, it seems that he is taking a holiday break, and it should be awhile before there's any concrete news of his next club move. Requesting ECP because there is an autoconfirmed editor adding the same unsourced material on 7 December and is active on that page. – robertsky ( talk) 18:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Request for temporary semi-protection. Multiple IP addresses making harmful edits and using quotes that aren't correct. Possible BLP issues. Given the contentious nature of the topics being discussed this will only go on and on. Request for 1 month of semi-protection. Samcowie ( talk) 00:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 00:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 01:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 02:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 02:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes to box office figures by IP/new users. Ab207 ( talk) 14:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I'm asking for a longer period of protection for the page, because as soon as the protection period is over, a user (who has already been blocked in all the sock profiles created) comes back with "sock" profiles to continue vandalizing the page, so I ask for a longer period of protection (maybe months) to see if this situation ends. Jerkusla ( talk) 14:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption - looks like a blocked IP editor may have switched IPs. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 02:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Until whatever national-scale event is happening at the place ends. TrangaBellam ( talk) 09:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs generally adding unsourced or improperly cited material. CruzRamiss2002 ( talk) 10:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Invalid OS talk 13:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article should be protected through GS/Beauty pageants, and is already seeing significant levels of vandalism due to recent major win. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) 16:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism and obvious socking. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Favonian ( talk) 17:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started right back up. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Favonian ( talk) 17:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent level of IP vandalism throughout 2021, likely the same troll who has targeted the page starting from October 2020. We have had 2 undiscussed blank-and-redirects within the past 24 hours. I suggest that this page be permanently semi-protected to stop wasting everyone's time, especially NPP editors who have to review the restored article each time the vandalism is reverted. Haleth ( talk) 00:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see one revert yesterday, and another one end of November. Overall, the article gets very little activity, certainly not enough for semi-protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar ( talk) 14:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The current main editor of the account is acting as gatekeeper. Decisions were made solely by this person and any reasonable attempt to challenge these is being dismissed and accusations cast out. There is a level of bias here that I think adds to impartiality. Given the contentious topics discussed on this page, a higher level of scrutiny should be in place. A group has decide in a chat to include 'opposes transgender rights' which is massivly invalid and shows a lack of proper editing of this page. Samcowie ( talk) 01:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined This can't be solved via protection, as the protection will block every contributor below a certain level. Engage on the article talk-page, some more eyes might be of benefit. Lectonar ( talk) 14:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Violate Three revert rule regarding persistent disruptive editing by a certain user ( User:Mingzhen Wu) for several attempts to change the content which established by a longstanding consensus, and giving no response per talk and warning. LVTW2 ( talk) 01:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 14:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because Vish Kumar VK is a singer and musician and have a good reputation around the internet with proper information over his name around the news. As I'm not able to move the page to article live. Kindly help. Sikhkuch ( talk) 20:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

That is not a reason. That pertains to the person and not the behavior surrounding the article-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 20:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
What is your connexion to Vish Kumar? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar ( talk) 14:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked and perhaps that will take care of the issue. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring petty vandalism, its getting annoying. Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 14:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – A few socks have recently been blocked. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 03:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially the same IP. Lectonar ( talk) 15:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been several edits in the past 2 months with this page getting vandalized and disruptive editing. For example vladimir boys, a sockpuppet, edited this page several times. some Ip address just made a disruptive edit, and some one put an innaproopriate joke about the word Woody in this article. I would like to have auto confirmed users only be able to edit. ― Kaleeb18 Talk 13:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP POV-pushing

@ Rafaelosornio: Feline Hymnic ( talk) 14:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Old vandalizm - [75], [76], [77].

New one (from his new fiancé, i suppose) - [78], [79], [80].

I think page needs pending changes protection. · Carn· !? 12:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism for months. Last request was declined in October 2020. Ureinwohner ( talk) 15:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Usedtobecool  ☎️ 03:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I think maybe this could be resolved with a certain user being blocked, but they keep on consistently vandalizing this page. AfricanChristmas ( talk) 05:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Request admin look into accounts involved as there is significant edit including the reporting user, who may be the primary offender. Slywriter ( talk) 15:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Factual errors. Fan inflating fan counts. Venkat TL ( talk) 16:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. ManaliJain ( talk) 18:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruption from multiple IPs signed, Willondon ( talk) 02:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I feel like I'm being WP:STONEWALL by interested parties in the subject's politics who are not familiar with Wikipedia, and I am unable to proceed due to disruptive editing behavior. Disclosure: I have requested semi-protection for the page before due to disruptive editing and content disputes. The page has been place under full protection before to prevent edit warring. See talk page and my extended writeup for any relevant archives. If this is the incorrect course of action, I'm sorry and would like to be redirected. Thank you. BriefEdits ( talk) 05:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated efforts from an IPs to remove or vandalize sourced information, adding unsourced information that is irrelevant to the article content. Possible right wing, anti-black type of troll. 2603:8080:F600:5AD6:C9B5:D110:6E0D:573 ( talk) 05:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, consistent posting of defamatory content, personalised attacks, generally from the same few accounts. I have tried to clean it up myself but the users return and repost the offending material. The content they are posting is inaccurate, untrue, politically motivated and malicious. 93.107.198.192 ( talk) 10:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant, obvious vandalism target. Dronebogus ( talk) 11:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Target of an IP-jumping sock account, repeatedly adding false information. Details of the SPI are here. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock should catch all of the IPs. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP users kept on reverting many times, and user was most attributed to sockpuppet and evading a block. See the backlog for yourself. This also account to all other seasons as well. TVSGuy ( talk) 11:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Suggest indef semi, either based on the fact that most of the last 50 edits have been reverted or dubious, or the under the WP:ARBIPA or WP:CASTE sanctions. Nature of the article suggests the situation won't improve. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 16:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring and persistent vandalism by new user RLMStern who refuses to read wikipedia guidelines and recently came out of a 48 hours block. The user does not have semi protected page edit rights yet, so I think semi protection would be sufficient. Just check the page history to see the disruptive editings and edit warring by the new user who was blocked for it but the block expired Dilbaggg ( talk) 17:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-Proetction Vandalism SLOTUSFLOTUS ( talk) 17:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 17:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This page is being consistently vandlised by trolls. There are some very derogatory content added by IPs in page history. This page was already under protection, seems like we need to do it again. Akshaypatill ( talk) 18:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism... still Piotr Bart ( talk) 19:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 19:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 19:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are inserting wrong calculated results. Vacant0 ( talk) 20:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 20:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 20:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian ( talk) 21:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
yup :)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 21:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonconstructive edit requests are repeatedly being submitted. wizzito | say hello! 21:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, same reason as Talk:Chicago Bears and Virginia Halas McCaskey. wizzito | say hello! 21:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP determined to include information without consensus. on-going EW. Slywriter ( talk) 21:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 22:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP determined to include content without consensus. Slywriter ( talk) 21:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 22:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

14 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, same as all Chicago Bears-related pages. wizzito | say hello! 21:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. - CorbieVreccan 00:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, same as all Chicago Bears-related pages. wizzito | say hello! 21:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. - CorbieVreccan 00:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 22:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 00:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of category/award using sources that fail to back up its existence. $chnauzer 21:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping BLP vios. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 01:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by requestor; seems to have gone away Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 01:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 01:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 198.52.184.12 & 147.194.156.7 blocked by Drmies. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 02:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Vivanna52 ( talk) 01:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_harassment_by_disruptive_Hong_Kong_IP. Citobun ( talk) 01:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The last protection was for 3 months, but ever since it expired about a month ago, disruptive and/or irrelevant comments have been posted basically daily. Zander251 ( talk) 06:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Citobun ( talk) 07:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Romanbigdog and User:Saha86830 have changed the logo, which causes the non-free logo to be deleted and makes the page disruptive. So, It is requested to protect this page. N.B. :- User:Romanbigdog got blocked because of inappropriate username. 🌍 🌍 卂卄卩 🌍🌍 07:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: to keep it safe Ticual ( talk) 08:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It is most likely the name of the Mercedes' next Formula 1 car. It should be create protected to prevent the posting of hoaxes. Sausagea1000 ( talk) 08:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Usedtobecool  ☎️ 09:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB ( talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – all substantive edits by one sockmaster; sockmaster came back just after month-long protection expired. ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ) 10:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dāsānudāsa ( talk) 10:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Just charged with child abuse offences. Vandalised 5 times in a couple of hours. Doctorhawkes ( talk) 11:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ronherry ( talk) 12:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 14:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts by IPs to list nonnotable people. MrOllie ( talk) 14:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Comment I removed the "notable" section for now; while there were sources, the sources simply included the phrase, seems too subjective to try to maintain a list of everyone who's ever had that description applied to them at least once. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Vandalism Adoreabhi ( talk) 09:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Article deleted, and salted. Lectonar ( talk) 14:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For the last year, this page has been the subject of persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. It has been page-protected several times, but each time the protection expires, the vandalism immediately begins again, despite comment warnings on the page and an FAQ on the talk page. (The FAQ was also recently vandalised.). Popcornfud ( talk) 11:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary sysop creation protection and move protection for the draft. Disruptive moves to mainspace over Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen. Protection is requested to prevent further disruptive moves. Not protecting as I consider myself too close to involved at this point. Please create protect the mainspace title and move protect the draft, or alternatively any other action you see necessary instead. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by requestor seems to be resolving itself. If it's moved to mainspace again it can always go to AfD. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from dynamic IPs. KH-1 ( talk) 09:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bad faith edits by IPs over the past few hours. Editor760 ( talk) 15:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Two bad edits in the last three months isn't grounds for protection.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resuming after last protection. — Coolperson177 ( t| c) 17:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP hopper repeatedly adding non-notable person, without any references, whose only claim to fame seems to be "a protest song against Boris Johnson" Arjayay ( talk) 13:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes made by vandal-users and IP address, same violations over the past couple of months, they kept on posting unsourced edits since last protection expired. Thalialioo ( talk) 15:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Why are you changing the lede title to one that doesn't match the article title? OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor adding WP:OR data relating to deprecated YouTube functionality. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lone-078 ( talk) 16:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of vandalism. Padavalam🌂  ►  19:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism making the same incorrect edit. I don't want to run the risk of falling victim to the 3R rule, but the same vandalism continues to happen. Anwegmann ( talk) 20:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced promotional content. Likely WP:PAID. - SUN EYE 1 12:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing contrary to MOS from IP's and new accounts that appear to all be the same. Ravensfire ( talk) 13:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent vandalism from IP users 149.14.146.26 ( talk) 17:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)# reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring unsourced claims of future resignation from IP user. HandsomeFella ( talk) 18:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a non-notable essay created as a content fork of Womanism for a Wiki Ed course. The article has been repeatedly redirected by multiple editors and repeatedly restored by the course's instructor even after the end of the course. Repeated communication with both course participants and Wiki Ed employees has not resolved the issue, so a technical solution is indicated. Vaticidal prophet 18:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Probably accidental template editor protection; notified by ping ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: COI / PROMO problems ongoing for years. Appears to be the same user IP hopping and using multiple accounts. Discussed Talk:Emmanuel_Lemelson#Ligand_Pharmaceuticals, previous IP blocks, talk archives, ANI threads etc.. requesting long-term protection 1-year suggested by User:Smalljim. Green C 19:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 19:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian ( talk) 22:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple recently registered editors violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple recently registered editors violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple recently registered editors violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple recently registered editors violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I would like to protect my article from vandalism. I feel like it will be vandalized a lot maybe because it is political and some people will make it biased, ruin it. So I would rather have it protected before something happens. Yodas henchman ( talk) 20:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

15 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism Jericho735 ( talk) 22:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Anti-abortion campaign to call it "murder" signed, Willondon ( talk) 00:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Anti-abortion campaign to call it murder signed, Willondon ( talk) 00:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent mass blanking and removal of sourced content by some disruptive IP users. Mann Mann ( talk) 14:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 10:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ctrlwikitalk22:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 10:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Jale1162 ( talk) 01:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done That was protected in 2007 and hasn't been touched since. Please do not make pointless requests here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on the page with unexplained and unsourced removal and edits. Please add protection to this page from the vandalism caused by IPs. MehmoodS ( talk) 21:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 07:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated hijacking by socks of Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 10:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Twitch streamer has been banned for a week on Twitch platform and there has been persistent editing, removal of content and claims with no references and additions of defamatory content. Panda619 ( talk) 10:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism against policy despite talkpage warning of the anonymous user -- Local hero talk 03:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not doneLocal hero, why are you edit warring to replace President of North Macedonia with a redirect? El_C 10:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ctrlwikitalk04:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 08:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous vandalism. HeinzMaster ( talk) 09:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ms0801 ( talk) 10:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term vandalism from an IP sockpuppet. I'm tired of reverting this nonsense, it's been going on for years. – DarkGlow00:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hi level of IP vandalism from different IP addresses - calling abortion murder etc - likely that more IP's will be used to make similar vandalism, requesting semi-protection for 1 week to prevent further IP abuse Such-change47 ( talk) 00:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Clpo13. El_C 11:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Parent page (SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant) is also protected, data is being heavily edited since it is a current event Fernando Trebien ( talk) 00:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ctrlwikitalk02:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Upcoming wrestling event article recieving much vandalism and disruption, should probably be protected until after event is over which is January 1, 2022. TylerBurden ( talk) 02:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Popular racing driver who recently left Formula One, persistent BLP violations and vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 03:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism to sourced content, esp. when related to Tigray War (ongoing conflict). Ckfasdf ( talk) 04:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 10:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yeti Dai ( talk) 07:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit to the article days ago. Lectonar ( talk) 09:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Hindi-language sexually explicit text from an IP-hopping LTA in Odisha. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 07:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hindi-language sexually explicit text from an IP-hopping LTA in Odisha. Any revisions containing Hindi-language text added by an Odisha IP should be revdel'd. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 07:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Hindi-language sexually explicit text from an IP-hopping LTA in Odisha. Any revisions containing Hindi-language text added by an Odisha IP should be revdel'd. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 07:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IPs (though likely same person) making changes to a parameter in infobox against the instructions for that parameter. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 11:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced death claim. TwoTwoHello ( talk) 13:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: After the lock was removed, the destructive activities started again through the IP addresses. Sabeelul hidaya ( talk) 13:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply
2409:4055:105:2096:0:0:2901:20AD (
talk) 
08:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar ( talk) 09:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Citobun ( talk) 11:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by IP editors in the last 24 hours, with four different IPs which assume to be controlled by the same person making identical claim of their edits. The behaviour has been warned by different editors with request of providing reliable source but were all disregarded. LVTW2 ( talk) 14:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Doing this because the last request wasn't explicitly denied or granted. The vandalism on the article warranted temporary protection, but not permanent, The dispute on the article has also died down, and most proposed changes were made. 2804:248:F61A:4F00:50B8:8CC6:D6AB:2711 ( talk) 19:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Courtesy @ Fuzheado: (CC) Tbhotch 19:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
It's one of the topics I could at least reasonably imagine keeping indefinitely semi-protected even after a specific dispute. Switch to pending changes and see what happens? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I would be for keeping it indefinitely semi-protected, in line with the articles of Adolf Hitler (which is even extended-confirmed protected, and Benito Mussolini. Lectonar ( talk) 14:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Concur that it's better to keep semi-protected indefinitely as pending changes is confusing to most everyone. - Fuzheado | Talk 11:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar ( talk) 11:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Article has been the target of various IP vandals over the past couple of days. Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 20:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP disruption beginning again. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 20:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 20:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Two instances of "lead" should be "led" in the section "Etymology" of the Spanish Flu article . See Dictionary for justification. Cpedw ( talk) 17:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done Deor ( talk) 18:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ip editor pushing edit that has been reverted by multiple editors. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 20:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk)
20:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyright violations, unsourced additions, sockpuppetry; you name it, it's probably here. Invalid OS talk 21:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – EF5 edits. HurricaneKappa ( talk) 20:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (Unsurprisingly). Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There is a fair amount of vandalism too. Helen( 💬 📖) 22:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

16 December 2021

Reason: Content Vandalism refferences provided in talk Netfox2022 ( talk) 19:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless ( talk) 20:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and what look like single-edit sockpuppets repeatedly edit warring over the lead photo. Lord Belbury ( talk) 20:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Less Unless ( talk) 21:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 22:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ethan Gaming 7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 23:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of false/unsourced chart peaks and sales amounts by the same IP. Magatta ( talk) 19:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 00:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: preventing Anonymous Users From editing wiki HyperHyper0828 ( talk) 01:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated Vandalism Rexh17 ( talk) 02:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. IP blocked for 31 hours. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of spamming 70.175.192.217 ( talk) 08:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Alexf.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced genre changes by IPs on a regular basis. Ab207 ( talk) 09:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ctrlwikitalk09:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Alexf.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: The template inclusions is less than 500, so the protection level should be reduced. Q28 ( talk) 08:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

AlexiusHoratius notified on their talk page. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I went ahead and changed the protection level to autoconfirmed. Alexius Horatius 20:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done (for the bot) Lectonar ( talk) 09:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – A lot of the previous edits to the page were vandalism, though edits aren't really frequent. Invalid OS talk 16:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Disruption not heavy enough to warrant even pending-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 07:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP edit warring against community consensus to remove the excerpt section. – NJD-DE ( talk) 00:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 08:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: He is a very prominent figure, especially in India. Periodic vandalism. High scope of future vandalism as well. Needs permanent semi-protection. Thank You. Kpddg ( talk) 05:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar ( talk) 08:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is strange activity on this article. Taking a look at the talk page, there are dozens and dozens of unsigned IP comments rejecting speedy deletion. All of these comments arrived within minutes of each other. SiliconRed ( talk) 05:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined This strange activity on the talk-page endet more than 3 weeks ago. The article itself has had no disruptive edits for more than 2 weeks. Lectonar ( talk) 08:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ctrlwikitalk06:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 11:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 09:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 09:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Vitaium ( talk) 10:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Move protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 11:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism/blanking. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 05:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent unexplained removals of content or insertions of clear vandalism by IP editors. There are very few redeeming edits by non-autoconfirmed users counterbalancing those that cause damage to the page. Page twice previously underwent temporary semi-protection and should now be indefinitely semi-protected. AlexEng( TALK) 08:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after protection expired. wizzito | say hello! 10:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 01:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: @ HurricaneEdgar: Yes, I see some disruptive edits by IPs, but not that much tbh, and the page is well watched to boot. Would you be so kind as to point out the "persistent" vandalism please? Lectonar ( talk) 08:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Only admins should create this premium template 151.19.71.211 ( talk) 07:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done - no need. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 09:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Elonus ( talk) 15:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent grossly insulting vandalism. Pending changes protection insufficient during this time of constant page vandalism. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper edit warring to include self published content (an Arxiv preprint). MrOllie ( talk) 15:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring gross violations of WP:BLP. Maybe also some existing versions need to be hidden. Sjö ( talk) 15:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian ( talk) 18:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring defamatory statements. Some version should maybe be hidden. Sjö ( talk) 16:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism NSAandGCHQ ( talk) 07:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: A lot IPs edit the page with wrong/bad things Th0masGR97 ( talk) 15:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Th0masGR97: I assume you meant Kostas Manolas rather than el:Κώστας Μανωλάς. Favonian ( talk) 18:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High-traffic newish article, concerning COVID-19 misinformation, that is now attracting IP disruption. Probably needs semi'ing in the first instance, and watch to see how things progress ... Alexbrn ( talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any need for extended confirmed protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of ip vandalism undoing edit without giving time to add ref २ तकर पेप्सी ( talk) 11:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent attempts to add a non-notable person to the Notable alumni section of the article. Concerted efforts have been made to add this person for several years, and recently those efforts have been stepped up. Both IP and recently-registered editors are involved. I've no idea whether it is one person socking, or multiple Youtube fans of the person involved. Given the use of registered usernames I'd like to see extended protection, but if that's too much at least semi-protection for a long or indefinite period. MichaelMaggs ( talk) 14:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Some background at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marcusmas. MichaelMaggs ( talk) 15:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 21:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IPs have been removing referenced content with the claim that it is vandalism when it is not ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 21:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent evidence of IP vandalizing subject's name Popoki35 ( talk) 16:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

17 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The anonymous user keeps adding the Cartoon Network Studios (despite it not being listed in the credits) without adding any proof it has been involved in the production. I tried to draw his attention on the talk page, but to no avail: he is completely silent and keeps reversing edits. Ромми ( talk) 13:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

change Dave Scotti to Davy Garlo. See Screen Actors Guild, Webpage, YouTube, AEA, IMDb etc… DinoJinx ( talk) 10:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – If you want the article renamed, you should follow the procedure described in Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting a single page move. Favonian ( talk) 18:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Reason is the same as above, but also with "digital eMation" outsourcing studio. Normally the studios that produce the animation abroad don't appear in templates for films, series, etc. (as in Futurama). This is the same user who is silent. Ромми ( talk) 13:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Too much edit warring (r/v) by Mlynek35, valid sources stated for changes in edit summary. GoodSamaritan611 ( talk) 17:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 21:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 21:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent IP edits to the lede in service of an unsourced, putatively apocryphal claim about the phrase's etymology and meaning. Some 2021 examples (inexhaustive): [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92] Eeskildsen ( talk) 22:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Reason: repeated IP vandalism over the past 2 days. --Animalparty! ( talk) 22:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. See history and talk page discussion here. C.J. Griffin ( talk) 23:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 15:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 15:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 15:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 15:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon users constantly changing tornado ratings. United States Man ( talk) 17:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page history is simple: vandalism from IP, then reversion. The last useful IP edit I could find was from over two years ago, and since then there have been ~100 edits. I see no point in using pending-changes protection, given the lack of constructive IP edits. A lengthy bout of protection, given the period of disruption, would be helpful. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – From some days there are disruptive edits from IPs. So semi protection is needed. Shinnosuke15, 17:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: A person who has a dynamic IP keeps making disruptive edits to the article and made some disruptive edits on the talk page [93] last week. Also ping @ El C: per this comment. Admins, I've dealt with this person for a while and I can tell you they will be back with another IP address, so blocking a single IP address is not a great solution. VR talk 18:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 08:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: People no longer send false information, making it safe. And also there are some errors in the article. 180.74.218.55 ( talk) 02:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 07:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending changes for disruptive editing. Not many watchers on the page, an IP editor is persistently attempting to add original research into the article and they are irresponsive to attempts at communication. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • The IP version is better than the one you prefer though, correcting errors and bringing things up to date (e.g. removing a name from the team which is not mentioned on the linked source). Fram ( talk) 12:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
    Fram, sorry, what? They added a bunch of primary sources which do not directly verify their material. They added that "...remained in print from 1995 to 2020. The magazine, which celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2015, published its last print edition in June 2020" and provide their instagram page as a citation which not only doesn't support the line anywhere and even has its last post 5 hours ago. If you look at their first edit ( Special:Diff/1053098961), this is based on their personal experience. Then there is a notice which states that they aren't taking new subscriptions for the time being, presumably added to support the assertion that the magazine does not publish anymore. The two are not the same thing, this is OR 101. In any case, the notice in the lead isn't encyclopedic content. The removal of the name of the team member can be retrained sure but not the rest, I did not check the last bit, my bad. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
    • Well, they sure haven't printed a new edition since their April-May 2020 magazine [94], so that part seems correct. No new print versions, no new subscriptions... Instead of blindly reverting and trying to get the article protected, it would be better to try to write a compromise version, incorporating undeniable facts (no ne printed issues for 1 1/2 years, no subscriptions for printed issues accepted) and leaving out the interpretation of them: then you can see if the IP accepts this. And with an IP editor without a fixed IP (like here), it is no use trying to contact them on their talk page, they may very well never have seen your message. Try posting to the article talk page instead. Fram ( talk) 13:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
      Eh, I should say that this looks like an insistence for "truth" rather than verifiability. They are publishing new pieces on their website and marking it as part of the 2021 issues, so it's not even that clear. Anyways, I have removed the more egregious ORey material and added some templates to the article for now. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA and IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA and IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 10:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most IP requests, new editors are the same requests which are rejected by other users. Knight Skywalker ( talk) 13:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket ( talk) 23:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. some IPs are going to restore the section of "In development" the page for it. NSAandGCHQ ( talk) 00:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 02:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Looking at the logs and the history, this person is nicknamed "Mr. Techno from Greece". (CC) Tbhotch 02:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent Vandalism; Unsourced contents keeps on coming Seaweed Brain1993 ( talk) 04:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Athlete article getting persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Protection for a month or so would help. TylerBurden ( talk) 04:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 04:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism for a long long time. BlameRuiner ( talk) 08:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hog Farm Talk 15:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Spotanus ( talk) 10:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Pending changes for disruptive editing. GodNey ( talk) 11:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., standard TFA vandalism. Hog Farm Talk 15:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jim Pleiades Hawkins ( talk) 13:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, along with the occasional addition of fringe theories, mainly the "Black Olmec" theory. Eridian314 ( talk) 19:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.21.241 ( talk) 17:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing nationalist POV editing: let's give User:Bazza 7 a break in their vigil. — hike395 ( talk) 17:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism in the past month Lol1VNIO ( talk) 18:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Zero edits in the last seven days. BusterD ( talk) 15:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 ( talk) 21:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only vandalized twice in the last week, and that user has been blocked; re-report if it gets worse. Hog Farm Talk 15:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism from IP and new accounts. Northheavensky ( talk) 05:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Endorse, very regular disruptive editing and vandalism. Mako001 ( talk) 07:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Endorse, vandalism increased after UNESCO recognition. Ckfasdf ( talk) 11:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Endorse, because of UNESCO acknoledges Songket is from Malaysia, many IPs and users from Indonesia triggered by this and try to change the fact. SNN95 ( talk) 15:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Plastikspork. Favonian ( talk) 18:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted after end of previous protection. Knuthove ( talk) 12:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Previous protection expired 1.5 months ago, and only 4 vandalism edits since then, and only a couple in the last several days. Just not enough here to warrant protection. Hog Farm Talk 15:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the original block of IP addresses was unwarranted. The request for edits to this article was not disruptive and was meant in good faith. The editor provided well grounded information, much of it indisputably common knowledge and otherwise accurately sourced. At the very least, there should have been an honest examination of the merits of the proposed changes. 105.161.91.33 ( talk) 11:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian ( talk) 16:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It contains false information, partial opinion and the phrasing is not consistent with the Wikipedia standards. 213.55.220.92 ( talk) 14:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 16:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This Part is about the section “Wildlife and Nature” I plan to add this part after the “Ocean ecosystem” as another subtitle.

Climate Change Effects on Ocean Animals

Climate change has had adverse effects on the survival and reproduction of different marine organisms, especially fish and other invertebrates. The changes in the composition of water characteristics from incidences such as increased acidification resulting from C02 absorption limit aquatic survival. When industries emit a significant amount of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere a significant amount of the gases are absorbed by large water bodies. The influence of changing water bodies composition has resulted in the extermination of different fish species with others moving to new latitudes [1]. Besides, there is a significant enrichment of water bodies by nutrients that flow from increased farming activities. The nutrients support the significant growth of marine plants. The influence is competition for space of such plants with originations such as fish and deprecation of available oxygen. Besides, through climate change, there are increased incidences of eutrophication that are influencing the rise of invasive plant species in the water bodies [6]. The effect is significant competition for space for the indigenous plants that are a significant food source for marine animals. Through increment of water temperatures influenced by the higher rate of absorption of rising heat on earth, there is a disturbance of marine specifies life cycles. Some of the animals are unable to withstand the rising temperatures, resulting in significant deaths and probable future extinction. The climatic changes influenced by global warming support significant algal blooms in different parts of the globe especially in the USA, Japan, Europe, and Australia. The introduction of aquatic macrophytes in terrestrial ecosystems, wetlands, and freshwater has caused significant ecological changes. The influence is an increasing trend of invasion of lacertian species to the sea from the seas to oceans and vice versa [8]. Aquatic ecosystems are relatively sensitive to changes in their habitat conditions. The projected aquatic biodiversity adverse effects from global warming are relatively higher when compared to the terrestrial counterparts. A quantitative synthesis shows that climate change influences a warming-induced reduction related to the sizes of ectothermic species [3]. There are over 30,000 species of diverse vertebrates living in water and climate change is likely to lower this number in the future [3]. The coexistence of the identifies specifies occurs through structured food-webs, which are significantly distorted by the ongoing climate change in the globe. For fishes, their common biological adaptation to their habitat change is moving to newer areas. The impact is a disruption of food for marine animals that depends on them. Aquatic species that cannot grow in the increased warm waters are also likely to reduce the food available for aquatic animals. The influence is an imbalance in the marine ecosystem and the eventual extinction of many marine plants and animals’ species.

This part should be add into section “Physical Impacts”, which is more specifically under subtitle “Sea Ice”

Climate Change Effects on Ice Melting

Climate change is a significant contributor to increasing ice melting on the earth’s poles. Solar radiation on ice is expected to be reflected because ice and snow are relatively white causing significantly less impact on their melting. However, due to the rising global warming, there is an increment in the earth’s temperatures that contribute to ice melting, especially during summer [2]. The incidence contributes to the exposure of the lands and oceans underneath such melted ice. The exposed surfaces absorb more of the incoming solar radiation which they later release to the atmosphere. The influence is an increment in the overall heat on the surface of the earth, which contributes to increased global warming. Therefore, melting ice has an indirect influence in causing more global warming and the eventual melting of more ice. There is a prediction that in years to come, there will be no more ice on the surface of the Arctic ocean [5]. Global warming is further causing significant thawing of permafrost, which supports the release of carbon dioxide trapped in the land source. The gases are released to add to the problem of global warming and more permafrost melts. A combination of thermal expansion and increased mountain glaciers’ melting is also resulting in an increment in the seawater levels. There is a prediction that the sea level will have raised by about 1.5 to 2.7 feet by the beginning of the 22nd century [4]. The prediction relates to the current prediction of global warming, but the actual increment may be higher if efforts are not in place to reduce global warming. There is a possibility that continued temperature rise will influence higher melting of ice sheets, which will significantly increase water volumes in oceans. Paleoclimatic evidence shows that with an addition of between 1.5 to 2 degrees centigrade of warming, there is a possibility of overhauling Greenland Ice Sheet destruction [7]. Such an incidence has the potential of increasing sea levels by over five meters. Such a substantial rise in water levels could submerge multiple islands and cause significant flooding of cities bordering large water bodies.

  Work Cited [1]. Assan, D., Kuebutornye, F. K., Mustapha, U. F. et al. (2020). Effects of climate change on marine organisms. American Journal of Climate Change, 9(1), 204-216. [2]. EPA. (2021). Climate change indicators: Snow and ice. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/snow-ice [3]. Huang, M., Ding, L., Wang, J. et al. (2021). The impacts of climate change on fish growth: A summary of conducted studies and current knowledge. Ecological Indicators, 121(1). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20309158 [4]. Selin, H., & Mann, M. E. (2021). Global warming. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/global-warming [5]. UCAR. (2021). Climate and Ice. https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/climate-change-impacts/climate-and-ice [6]. Wabnitz, C. C., Lam, V. W., Reygondeau, G. et al. (2018) Climate change impacts on marine biodiversity, fisheries and society in the Arabian Gulf. PLoS ONE 13(5), 1-26. [7]. Wunderling, N., Willeit, M., Donges, J.F. et al. (2020). Global warming due to loss of large ice masses and Arctic summer sea ice. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-8. [8]. Yanik, T. & Aslan, I. (2018). Impact of Global Warming on Aquatic Animals. Journal of Zoology, 50(1), 353-363. Marslyc ( talk) 09:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 16:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP and new user deletion of sourced content and insertion of unsourced content. Chariotrider555 ( talk) 18:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, there was indeed a number of bad edits on 6 December but nothing else special as far as I can see.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ranadhira ( talk) 05:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus ( talk) 21:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – This page was the target of a disruptive move today, and I can't see any legitimate reason for it to ever be moved. Zander251 ( talk) 19:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal. Favonian ( talk) 21:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Same BLP vandalism continues a couple days after the previous protection was lifted. Yeeno ( talk) 🍁 05:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2600:100e:b100::/40 is blocked from editing the article for one year. Favonian ( talk) 19:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. High profile goalkeeper article getting massive amount of vandalism, will probably need to be protected for several months. TylerBurden ( talk) 12:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk)
13:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss ( talk) 21:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 22:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 21:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC) 21:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Euryalus ( talk) 22:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be being hit by edit warring over the subject's religion. Possible BLP issue? I've got no position on the data but I am hating the disruption - can we please give it a break and try to get it to Talk? Thanks. DBaK ( talk) 22:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 22:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

18 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism after expiry of protection. See this 2402:3A80:6CA:2E99:998F:B03D:8DE5:A582 ( talk) 10:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

: Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Had already been protected by Johnuniq; activity since then doesn't warrant fresh protection. -- Euryalus ( talk) 21:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 16:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 80.209.182.194 ( talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Re-report if someone else resumes with it. Hog Farm Talk 21:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting protection for List of Sunny Day episodes. IP user 115.135.27.137 performed persistent disruptive editing on the page, and the edits made have since been reverted. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 21:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 22:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editor over the past week. FyzixFighter ( talk) 20:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and BLP violations, as subject has been accused of sexual assault today. Kbabej ( talk) 21:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Every day an IP comes and restores their unsourced or poorly sourced content, claims to be "Clinton Kane", removes content, and violates MOS:ETHNICITY. It's getting repetitive now and just filling up the page history unnecessarily. AshMusique ( talk) 07:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by one purpose IP in last 24 Hours, already reverted by 2 different editors Theonewithreason ( talk) 07:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also please RevDel the edit made by the IP per RD3. It is similar to the previous edit, likely made by the same person. Eevee01( talk) 08:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - IP vandalism. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Rude messages are sent to me and this page periodically. Please protect. Шериф (музыкальный коллектив) ( talk) 10:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done Bbb23 ( talk) 21:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism extending over months diff, diff, diff, diff. Requesting semi-protection for a year. Santacruz Please ping me! 11:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. HurricaneEdgar 13:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Need protection due the sockpuppetry. HurricaneEdgar 13:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Sajaypal007 ( talk) 13:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 14:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing relationship details after being told their edits are disruptive and being reverted and after being warned about edit warring. LADY LOTUS TALK 22:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extended semi-protection. Persistent sockpuppetry. CMD ( talk) 22:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The moment protection was removed, IP vandal removing and changing stable page info with their opinion. Kbabej ( talk) 21:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet ( talk) 00:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.21.241 ( talk) 00:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.21.241 ( talk) 00:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.21.241 ( talk) 00:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.21.241 ( talk) 00:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This BLP is periodically subject to heavy disruptive editing from both the subject's fans and detractors. EnPassant♟♙ ( talk) 22:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 ( talk) 06:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant adding of unsourced information, especially from IPs, and it will probably only get worse in the upcoming days as the game was just released. ArojamDharkon ( talk) 07:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ziadtarek55555 ( talk) 01:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: 2 IPs originating from Philippines persistently adding failed verification content to the award's nominees table despite multiple warnings. I did report the first IP yesterday (but no one blocked it) but they returned with another IP address (I assumed they are using dynamic IP) today and started the same nonsense as yesterday. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 11:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several IP editors are keep adding unsourced content like adding 'spouses' in the infobox. VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 12:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – RD2: Serious BLP violations (Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material in Hindi Language IP). Please look into it and revdel IP edit. Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unconstructive and disruptive editing by IPs and recently confirmed editors. I would suggest a temporary extended confirmed protection. ManaliJain ( talk) 13:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 13:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Specifically the insertion of WP:GOSSIP: I'm a bit concerned about the persistent mention of a relationship between her and actor Tom Holland, with at least one source constantly cited to back it, which neither confirms nor denies the relationship itself (it more identifies other sources, unreliable by Wikipedia standards, which say this). Unfortunately, even if an admin goes with extended-confirmed protection of the article, there are still going to be insertions of this gossip (EC editors have also added this content from time to time.) I'm tempted to ask for indefinite ECP, but I don't know. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You'd be better off going with indefinite ECP. I've never seen any point of specifically asking for ECP or semi-protection to just be temporary as doing so only opens things up for additional disruption in the future once that expires. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 00:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Page is likely popular with newer editors other than the ones just wanting to spam gossip, and a shorter ECP will give them a chance. Can be extended if the current nonsense persists. -- Euryalus ( talk) 05:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 ( talk) 15:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 05:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP adding made up interim president, unsourced, contradicting sourced content Aréat ( talk) 15:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, per General sanctions/Beauty pageants, this article needs indefinite protection. The beauty pageant community have been demonstrated to be prime targets for vandalism and disruptive editing, and that is being proven with this article, being a major winner. Indefinite protection is wholly necessary per the already established general sanctions. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. Logged GS action. El_C 05:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors keep making changes to tornado ratings that contradict the cited reliable sources. TornadoLGS ( talk) 18:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs have been removing referenced content with the claim that it is false information ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's dance, bot! El_C 06:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 21:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 03:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 04:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Citobun, vandalism is a narrow subset of disruptive editing. This isn't vandalism. El_C 06:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeat article hijacking attempts 98.230.196.188 ( talk) 15:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined. Not seeing the repeat part, IP. El_C 05:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting protection for Big City Greens. IP user 115.135.27.137 performed persistent disruptive editing on the page, and the edits made have since been reverted. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 21:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting Pending Changes Protection. Page is almost targeted by IP hoaxing vandals almost everyday. Recent page history just shows a bunch of IP edits that are all rolled back in groups. Although there was a previous RFPP done within the last 30 days, the situation has become worst. The hoaxing IP address had previously been ranged blocked, but has come back after the range block ended. Furthermore, there are now new IP address unrelated to the previously range blocked IP address now adding on to the hoaxing pile.

Please do something. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 01:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 07:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 11:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extended confirmed access Washington Lincoln ( talk) 12:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  LauritzT ( talk) 10:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of One week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf (talk) 13:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of recurring IP vandalism. Andra Febrian ( talk) 12:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Alexf (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0B:826:9D4E:E1EE:C486:E6C3 ( talk) 13:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already done. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0B:826:6C23:2EAD:C847:C600 ( talk) 13:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of disruptive campaign by warrior against WP:DONOTFIXIT, for which protection was previously put in place on 19th September and 30th August. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 15:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 15:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: The protection is no longer necessary because this template is not widely used and used on a single page, that is Vascular plant. Vitaium ( talk) 02:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Vitaium: I don't follow. At that page, I clicked "what links here" then "Transclusion count". That showed "82524 transclusion(s) found." Johnuniq ( talk) 04:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Johnuniq's observation confirmed. Favonian ( talk) 11:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0B:826:64E1:8061:85E5:957 ( talk) 13:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated editing against consensus from IPs. Giant Snowman 15:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: One or several single-issue users with conflict of interest continually deleting content from article Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 16:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The person has recently joined office as general secretary of ruling Nepali Congress. A sock poppet Khamba1234 is making disputive change. He is also destroying Arjun Narasingha K.C. and 14th general convention of Nepali Congress. Help doing something here. 110.44.124.152 ( talk) 05:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: IP, disruptive how? Sock on the basis of what? El_C 05:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Usedtobecool: what do you think? El_C 05:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
El C,the filer is obviously banned user Curious boy np who has rather misguided an idea of a patriotic duty, which involves propping up Nepali Congress and its select leaders (mostly Bimalendra Nidhi). There just doesn't appear to be a good way to deal this user. Protection may be advisable to give us some respite from this user, not anyone else. Otherwise, I would go for WP:BANREVERT; Khamba is either also Curious and this conflict has been manufactured to mislead us, or they are a new good faith contributor. Curious has so many accounts and IPs these days; it's hard to AGF with any new account. But some interest from new editors around this topic area is to be expected this month. So, I would not assume anyone except the filer is working against Wikipedia's goals in favour of their misguided political beliefs, yet. Regards! Usedtobecool  ☎️ 15:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Ah, mystery solved, thanks. User(s) blocked. El_C 15:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocking socks isn't enough to stop whoever keeps trying to reinstate their changes. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 14:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocking socks isn't enough to stop whoever keeps trying to reinstate their changes. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 14:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 16:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 19:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please salt, repeatedly recreated. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring is no longer a concern on the article; the page needs to be updated and the edit request is being ignored so far. – DarkGlow19:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotected – for the bot. Favonian ( talk) 17:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP/proxy-abusing vandal. Was previously protected before but returned after that expired. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 17:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 20:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Stroopwafels ( talk) 17:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 20:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed after unprotection. (CC) Tbhotch 18:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 20:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- TheImaCow ( talk) 18:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Lots of vandalism in the last few days. Super Ψ Dro 18:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article recently had a lengthy semi protection, that has expired. Once it did, the disruptive editing started immediately, so requested an indefinite (or at least additional lengthy) semi protection again. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP issues re: ongoing court case, from both IPs and new users. —  Shibbolethink ( ) 20:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Module:Chem2. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. Boo, I still suck. Getting off the stage, Pppery. El_C 21:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations have resumed following the previous protection's expiration. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 21:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. So many edit conflicts, so little thyme. El_C 21:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Stroopwafels ( talk) 17:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Leave me be, bot, I'm trying to submit the thing! Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 21:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from multiple anon editors - not sure of the reason. KylieTastic ( talk) 18:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring brought upon by a near-certainly sockpuppeting user repeatedly reverting correct information on the basis that the information (a band's name change) came about by force, of which the truthfulness of this statement is not elaborated upon. An attempt to talk this out in one of the account's talk pages and the article's talk page by another user ( Kcianrgd/ talk) have not been responded to. Lllogan ( talk) 18:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive-editing and Edit-warring An IP has been repeatedly adding information which isn't supported by sources provided. Harout72 ( talk) 19:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

19 December 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism stemming from ongoing controversy around school's decision to move classes online. Chamott50 ( talk) 16:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 19:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – White washing edits by various IPs. The topic falls under WP:ARBEE, so I would recommend permanent protection. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Amortias ( T)( C) 19:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi @ Amortias: it's unclear which users have been blocked. The two most recent IPs on the page are not blocked. Could you please clarify? -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ K.e.coffman: How very odd, I must mis-clicked the wrong template. Apologies will re-review to see what I was aiming to do. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As a standard administrator action. If disruption continues can look into using arbitration as an alternative. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: MusikBot II made this editable only by templateeditor+, but really it should be editable by anyone (being a sandbox css file). I don't know how to prevent the bot from re-protecting, however. — hike395 ( talk) 22:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotected Someone must have used the sandbox styles in the main module at some point, causing the transclusion count to spike to over 5,000. There's only 9 transclusions now, so we can safely unprotect. MusikAnimal talk 23:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sockpuppetry - Insertion of comments by IPs with no editing history. Request semi-protection. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Just put {{ spa}} tags on their comments, the closing admin will be able to filter out their votes. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: other reasons 103.58.152.17 ( talk) 17:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 20:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: changing of content and providing false information Rishi.A.Desai ( talk) 17:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined duplicate request Amortias ( T)( C) 20:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are multiple SPAs adding egregiously promotional content to this article. Not sure if they are sockspuppets or meatpuppets but a bit of semi-protection should at least slow them down a bit. DanielRigal ( talk) 22:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is absolutely constantly vandalized. Please protect for a long period of time (one year) for example. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 23:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 203.144.73.71 ( talk) 18:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Boo, 0/0 for Example Article Name comedy. 😾 El_C 20:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent talk-page disruption by IPs and non-ACs, who are misusing the talk page as a WP:SOAPBOX. This has lasted for a few days already, and, well, a short term break seems in order. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 02:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant IP vandalism over the past two months (patent nonsense; using WP as a forum). Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 02:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site ( talk) 07:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent violations of biographies of living person's policy (perennial problem) which include addition of Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material. Ancyran ( talk) 07:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long history of flame wars and vandalism 61.68.205.161 ( talk) 07:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recently stabbed at a concert, is currently in critical condition. Multiple edits have already been made to label him as dead despite no proof of his condition. Seems good to lock it until his condition is made public. Syd Highwind ( talk) 08:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 10:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of editors bias. MZRPoor ( talk) 09:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It's a draft that's not written in English, and it was created exactly one minute' before this editor (the article creator) opened this request for protection (and one minute later the following identical request was made by another editor). Meters ( talk) 09:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not done — not a legit request. El_C 10:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of editors bias. DrFarzanM ( talk) 09:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done — not a legit request (still). El_C 10:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last month, there has been numerous unsourced update to the subject's personal life section by IP users. Aviator006 ( talk) 11:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 'Tis the season for vandalism; protection for a week or two should be sufficient. Trivialist ( talk) 06:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP users keep adding unsourced (or hoax) content into the article (such as adding Kapamilya Channel) without citing a reliable source. Article was previously protected in the past due to the same issue but expired afterwards and the IPs continue to vandalize the article again. VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 07:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Assertions from IPs that Manchin is corrupt and a Republican etc. Sdrqaz ( talk) 16:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long term regular IP vandalism. Sajaypal007 ( talk) 13:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Rishi.A.Desai ( talk) 13:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Rishi.A.Desai ( talk) 13:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. IP edit warring to insert controversial content. VR talk 14:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 16:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection, edit warring by ip user 77.96.159.195 by adding unrelated ethnicities as related to the infobox (Arabs and Kurds). Regarding Iranian Azerbaijanis (by my edit), [see /info/en/?search=Iraqi_Turkmen#Language], speaking similar dialect. Beshogur ( talk) 13:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 14:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Wikipedia:High-risk templates – This template only has about 2900 transclusions. There is no need for it to be fully or cascading protected. ECP would be standard for a template of its usage level. User:GKFX talk 10:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi GKFX, is there something specific you'd like to change in the template's content? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
No there isn’t, I just noticed it as being massively over-protected - it shouldn’t even be TE protected but somehow it’s got onto the list of most-vital templates. User:GKFX talk 13:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
It could as well be a hardcoded MediaWiki feature, just like {{ !}} now is. Treating it as essentially hardcoded may explain the protection level. To me, the only downside of any protection level is the prevention of good edits, and I can't imagine any good edits to the template, so there's no downside. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 13:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar ( talk) 14:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Krishnajipandey ( talk) 13:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Go through the drafting process instead of asking for the title to be unprotected. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 13:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined Indeed; see above. Lectonar ( talk) 14:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – A combination of continual unsourced date of birth changes as well as repeated vandalism relating to Bigg Boss (Hindi season 15) (which is ECP through March 2022). ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 18:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing to this article isnt coming from auto confirmed editors so semi should do for nw. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – The day the protection was taken off this page has been vandalised and again from Brasil. This happened a month ago after temporary protection as well. This is systematic repeated vandalism over the same well cited point. We need a permanent protection on this page. Hesperian Nguyen ( talk) 02:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 17:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: ongoing IP POV pushing [95] [96] [97] Adoring nanny ( talk) 00:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism NSAandGCHQ ( talk) 02:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone insists on bloating the infobox with info that doesn't belong there. I've tried to explain why in edit summaries, but either they don't care or don't look. Haven't been able to use a TP because every day they come back with a different IP. MB 03:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This article has become the subject of an edit war and possible vandalism by IP editor 68.131.33.163, who has altered the info-box of who was/is voicing the character and in which dates. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This article has become the subject of an edit war and possible vandalism by IP editor 68.131.33.163, who has altered the info-box of who was/is voicing the character and in which dates. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd block the main IP, but they seem to have stopped after the second warning. - CorbieVreccan 19:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This article has become the subject of an edit war and possible vandalism by IP editor 68.131.33.163, who has altered the info-box of who was/is voicing the character and in which dates. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This article has become the subject of an edit war and possible vandalism by IP editor 68.131.33.163, who has altered the info-box of who was/is voicing the character and in which dates. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 04:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For years this page has been hit by the same form of IP vandalism, mostly from the 2600/2601 ranges, calling the team's arena a "dump" and similar. A recent three month protection ended in November, and it's happened three times since that expiration. It doesn't happen daily, but happens with frequency, at least bi-weekly if not more. If blocking the IP range(s) isn't an option kindly reinstate the protection, as that solved the problem when it was active. Echoedmyron ( talk) 15:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three instances of IP vandalism in less than 24 hours on a BLP including this. Please let me know if it doesn't reach the threshold as this I think this is my first request. SVT Cobra 17:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro ( talk) 17:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

20 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. -- Cheers, Bongo Cat ( TalkContribs ) 18:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Can be seen as a target for vandals. -- Cheers, Bongo Cat ( TalkContribs ) 18:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined. This article has not been edited since September. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Anon. IP keeps adding/removing the plot section. On and off for the last five days. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Highly Visible Template. Qwerfjkl talk 17:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 17:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn  (talk) 19:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. M.Bitton ( talk) 19:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It's being vandalised actively by several people. Skycloud86 ( talk) 21:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (duplicate) Johnuniq ( talk) 06:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly and persistently adding obscene claims to article. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations by IPs from Leinster, Ireland. Binksternet ( talk) 23:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu ( talk) 23:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Or a partial rangeblock. (CC) Tbhotch 02:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing and vandalism. Thanks. - Stiabhna ( talk) 21:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined @ Stiabhna: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. It looks like a minor disagreement about the image with nothing on the article talk page. I also (per your comment on talk) cannot see why this edit at Conservatism is a problem. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 02:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC) 02:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 04:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Opinions? Every IP/new-editor comment on that talk page since it was created in July 2017 has been junk. Maybe semi it for month and see what happens after that? Anything shorter doesn't seem worthwhile. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Random opinion: support a one-month semi with a note on the talkpage explaining why. Current spate of nonsense seems to have started in November: maybe they'll have found better things to do by mid-Jan. Wouldn't go for longer per wp:protect - the vandalism is a time sink but not especially virulent. -- Euryalus ( talk) 07:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Per above, I protected and left a message on talk. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep vandalizing the page and undoing their own vandalism. The Grand Delusion( Send a message) 05:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nonsense vandalism resuming after previous lengthy protection. -- Euryalus ( talk) 07:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even if we block the currently offending username, history has shown that he's just coming back under another name. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 23:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Good luck with that. I'll just find another acronym to create. Bee Conrad ( talk) 23:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Good point. Do not action this request. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined @ Larry Hockett: The users have been indeffed. Let me know if you see it resume, preferably with a reminder about this request. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Move-protection: It used to be move-protected but now it is not. I don't think there is any reason to move the page. Thanks! Jishiboka1 ( talk) 09:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. Well, it was move protected but in 2018 it was (accidentally?) set to semi instead of remaining at sysop level, as was the case for the decade 2008-2018. Agreed, there's no conceivable reason to move the page. And even if there was, it'd be WP:RM-only anyway. El_C 13:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection should be reduced as we have made changes as suggested by the administrators. Adoreabhi ( talk) 09:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – The draft is not protected (witness the fact that you have edited it), but the corresponding article space item is. Please await the outcome of the review. Favonian ( talk) 09:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated tendentious editing from a editor pushing a non-neutral POV over an ongoing conflict 67.185.158.250 ( talk) 05:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nothing good is coming out of non autoconfirmed editors on this page. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 09:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC is sorta working as intended (borderline), so let's see if this will help. El_C 13:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi protection. Persistent IP vandalism. Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 10:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0B:8E7:91D3:368E:C23C:D53A ( talk) 13:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Gjs238 ( talk) 21:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant reversion of cited statements by accounts with less than 500 edits, with some accounts seemingly created just to hide ip addresses (see User:Ford Tunderbird 1987, for example) Fluffy89502 ( talk) 23:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:ARBPIA ( WP:ARBIRP angle). El_C 13:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – This is a preemptive request as one of the two sisters that makes up of the group is currently embroiled in the divorce scandal that Wang Leehom has found himself in, and his ex-wife has been continuously release allegations of him being unfaithful. – robertsky ( talk) 17:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Currently, the level of activity doesn't justify ECP, but if autoconfirmed accounts start causing problems, feel free to request an increase in protection. clpo13( talk) 17:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This sandbox was accidentally used in articles for a while so got protected by MusikBot. This has now been fixed, so it should be unprotected like other sandboxes. User:GKFX talk 14:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotectedxaosflux Talk 17:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A person using so far 4 different IPs is attempting to force his POV changes through edit warring, altering sourced information and whatnot. HistoryofIran ( talk) 14:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Skjoldbro ( talk) 17:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 20:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This Page is in German 80.189.95.205 ( talk) 17:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined no it isn't ( Special:PermaLink/1059449177) — xaosflux Talk 17:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

21 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple users are actively trying to remove the controversy section off this article. It appears that they may be related to the company. Semi-protection is preferred in this case but whatever protection level can be added. Thank you. Kline | yes? 15:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent disruption by LTA. wizzito | say hello! 16:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

In Help:Your first article#The basics:

  • Register an account. All you need is to choose a username and password. This will give you various powers. After a few days of editing articles, it will give you the power to create a new one.

I propose to put the {{ If IP}} template around this section so it will only show up if you don't have an account, or alternatively also have the {{ If autoconfirmed}} template to create a unique message that shows if you don't yet meet the autoconfirmed requirements. My change is below: (note you may have to open the source editor to see the message)

* Register an account. All you need is to choose a username and password. This will give you various powers. After a few days of editing articles, it will give you the power to create a new one.* Edit articles. To create new articles, you need to be an established user by making good edits for some time. After a few days of editing articles, you will have the power to create a new one. 172.112.210.32 ( talk) 18:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Constant reversion of cited statements by accounts with less than 500 edits, with some accounts seemingly created just to hide ip addresses. Qwertyuiop849 ( talk) 16:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined Amortias ( T)( C) 23:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Rusalkii ( talk) 18:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Someone keeps removing information from the page, even though, it has been creditably sourced. Wikimazing75 ( talk) 22:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Upgrade protection to Extended-Confirmed: We've been getting a regular stream of autoconfirmed editors trying to whitewash the article of the COVID misinformation details due primarily to the subject's appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast (The talk page has also had to be semi-protected as a consequence; a lot of drive-by IPs complaining about the state of the article and not following up). — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. and Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. from other editors. Amortias ( T)( C) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Many IP Users Making Unconstructive Edits Mr Eat ( talk) 23:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by IPs and new users. wizzito | say hello! 04:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- TNT ( talk • she/they) 06:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. BilCat ( talk) 00:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy.  oncamera  (talk page) 03:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:31, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been heavily vandalized by IP addresses. They are adding deliberately false information, and now the majority of edits are made by these IPs. I highly encourage Wikipedia to end what has become a pool for vandalism, reverted edits, defamation, and whatnot. Dunutubble ( talk) 03:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP disruption started again as soon as the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 ( talk) 08:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This tweet is pulling in IPs to add some in-joke. Hemanthah ( talk) 09:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 09:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 16:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from new users. There have been many people vandalizing and it takes time to undo them. Jishiboka1 ( talk) 01:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Unrelenting disruption. El_C 12:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy. KyleJoan talk 02:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdels. El_C 12:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent inappropriate use of a talk page by IPs ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by anonymous IPs in the past week, with three different IPs which assume to be controlled by the same person making identical edits [100] [101] [102] which were misinformation and giving no relevant reason for the change. LVTW2 ( talk) 18:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of non-MoS edits due to new film's release. Bloodyboppa ( talk) 21:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 101.128.126.185 ( talk) 01:31, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: File name is common or generic name. Vitaium ( talk) 03:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 12:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes per IPs/new users. Ab207 ( talk) 14:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material, autoconfirmed has not stopped it. Also probably so.e socking going on too. Mako001 ( talk) 15:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. El_C 13:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Permanent semi-protection: new users and IPs have been adding unsourced original research into the article for ages already. This protection has been needed since a long time. Super Ψ Dro 17:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing and often being targeted by certain sockpuppets of banned editor Dimpsboyno03. VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 06:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I know my previous requests were unwarranted, and I apologize for that, but this time there really does appear to be an edit war regarding who is still voicing Bullwinkle. And the IP editor known as 68.131.33.163 makes these changes and has even removed valid references without explaining. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 17:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Venkat TL ( talk) 17:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Venkat TL, I'll take your temporary and raise an indef (all in). El_C 13:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ El C thank you. I agree that it is a perennial problem. Hopefully in 2-3 years the fans will grow tired and move on. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent, sporadic IP vandalism. BattleshipMan ( talk) 06:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 07:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0B:1DE3:D9B6:D55F:1D15:91B7 ( talk) 13:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracts IP silliness: perhaps on school syllabus?. Pam D 07:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: PamD, last edit was like a year ago. What am I missing? El_C 13:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I fixed the pagelink.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Déjà vu, Bbb23! El_C 14:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Large amount of attacks claiming false copyright association with noted songs BonesBones ( talk) 08:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. –– FormalDude talk 09:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined recent edits dont appear to be BLP violations as theyre sourced Amortias ( T)( C) 12:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 09:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hi,

This page has been protected by some groups who are against the Fano nationalist movement. As a Wikipedia is a place for a firsthand information access on various topics, people should be allowed to make edits which they think should be the fact.

This page specifically is related with the current conflict in Northern Ethiopia and people from both sides have different views on the Fano group. Unfortunately, the current article contains one sides view and is protected from including ideas and contributions from members of the group.

We hence ask for the responsible administrators to lift the protection and make the page available for edits and contributions.

Regards, Nigmit ( talk) 11:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done Page is protected by arbitration ruling. Please see WP:ER on how to request changes are made. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting protection for DisneyQuest. User DominicReymysterio619 performed persistent disruptive editing on the page, and the edits made have since been reverted. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 16:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The result of the election is going to broadcasted today. P.Shiladitya ✍talk 04:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

A few months ago I have requested as a original leader of LizardSquad back in the days; - /info/en/?search=Talk:Lizard_Squad We and I appreciate for any changes and fixing the wrong information. The current wikipedia-page is wrong and has alot of information which is not connected around us. 62.145.195.228 ( talk) 12:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 12:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous, non-stop vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 13:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced information by 187.187.192.72 that contradicts existing sources; requesting semi-protection. Cyberlink420 ( talk) 14:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name. Vitaium ( talk) 15:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eridian314 ( talk) 15:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Another controversial COVID treatment article, attracting drive by disruption from IPs. Alexbrn ( talk) 16:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – see Jack Ninte. GPL93 ( talk) 18:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. clpo13( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 38 reverts this month, mostly from IP editors trying to inject POV (e.g. "Babbitt is a domestic terrorist"). Due to the nature of this article, I don't anticipate this issue going away. Is American Politics so qualifies for DS protection. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 18:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Per WP:ARBAPDS. clpo13( talk) 19:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated – see Jack Ninte. Target of a large sockfarm with at least 4 socks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 18:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. clpo13( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 ( talk) 19:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13( talk) 19:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

22 December 2021

Reason: MariaJaydHicky sock edits 2600:387:0:80D:0:0:0:37 ( talk) 17:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Report to WP:AIV if necessary. clpo13( talk) 19:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced since December 3, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 21:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 23:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (changing contestant names and the winner) shanghai. talk to me 13:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because no one misutlising it. 2405:201:E025:109C:7C78:30C0:C169:63A6 ( talk) 14:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: would you not agree that its not being "misused" as it cant be due to the protection Amortias ( T)( C) 15:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I agree that it should be reduced

Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

To add some content to the plot section of demon slayer mugen train Wikipedia page TheDarkAngel889 ( talk) 07:15, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You are going to need to be more specific as to what exactly you want changed. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of "plot" section by IP-hopping editor. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking by GRP and Wikinger. Java Hurricane 11:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs (removing factual statements). Yolo4A4Lo ( talk) 11:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Various instances of vandalism. Davidlofgren1996 ( talk) 21:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs, obviously group attack. DuncanHill ( talk) 23:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Consistent vandalism of page with changing of surname from 方 to 法克 (which will be an almost literal chinese translation of fucker). Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 03:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: I don't think content disputes last 8 years. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 08:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 11:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an edit war on how the names of Rocky's voice actors should be formatted, and if Tara Strong needs to go by her maiden name. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 21:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Resumes after 6 month protection ended. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 08:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again requesting this be extended - previously protected for months, started up again after that expired. My most recent request was declined two days ago as not disruptive enough [103] but already it's happened again since. IP vandalism from a particular range going back years. Echoedmyron ( talk) 11:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Slow burn IP edit warring. Accusations of one user being a banned user. Please protect to force discussions to create consensus. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

See also: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Agdam Mosque ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent attempts to add promotional content by sockpuppet accounts. MrOllie ( talk) 13:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts to add promotional content by sockpuppet accounts. MrOllie ( talk) 13:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Registered user and IP using the page as a bizarre bulletin board for some sort of personal announcement. Sdrqaz ( talk) 13:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2405:201:E025:109C:7C78:30C0:C169:63A6 ( talk) 14:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 03:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Change his children amount from 3 to 2. He only has 2 children. This page is wrong. I am his Neice. Taythetruth300 ( talk) 11:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – The right venue for this kind of request is Talk:Meek Mill, but you have already made two requests there and they were both turned down because you failed to provide reliable sources for your claim. Stating that you are related to Meek Mill is not sufficient. Favonian ( talk) 11:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing IP vandalism. Joeyconnick ( talk) 21:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing IP vandalism. Joeyconnick ( talk) 21:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – People attempting to add his real name and birthdate (which is only sourced so far to sources not fitting BLP). wizzito | say hello! 02:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Date changing vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 02:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: As a Kargil Hero, un-registered users should be stopped from editing anything here. Arunudoy ( talk) 06:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined no valid reason for protection Amortias ( T)( C) 12:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Require PETA to disclose their true primary mission that they hide from the public while pretending to care about protecting animals which they do not.

Donated funds from well intended but mislead contributors is used to lobby legislative bodies to make touching a pet in ways their religious beliefs object to, a felony crime while encouraging continues use of steel leg traps so horribly painful the trapped pet or non domesticated animal literally chews off it’s own foot in an unsuccessful attempt to free itself.

When the trapper arrives and finds someone’s pet in their trap they don’t try to rescue someone’s beloved animal, they kill and hide it so it’s owner can never discover what happened to the dog or cat they love and miss so much.

PETA is an organization with an agenda they hide from the public that must be fully exposed to better inform potential donors who wrongly assume their generous donation will go to stop such horrific pain and death of innocent animals. 192.181.193.3 ( talk) 09:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not doneWP:SOAPBOX. Favonian ( talk) 11:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has recently been an edit war on who is still currently voicing Blossom. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 21:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: grumble grumble edit conflicts, grumble grumble. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unmotivated addition of UPE template Simonesda ( talk) 09:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined not a valid reqason for protection Amortias ( T)( C) 12:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2402:3A80:1214:3AA4:7C05:A697:C1:3B14 ( talk) 12:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)The Page requires updates reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 13:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs are messing with the languages of the film repeatedly since 13 December DareshMohan ( talk) 19:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: DareshMohan, please provide diffs. Unclear edit summaries make this request difficult to parse. El_C 13:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Here. The IP starting with 2001: keeps adding the Telugu title although the film is dubbed. The IP keeps adding this from different IP addresses all starting with 2001:. They did this on December 13. DareshMohan ( talk) 18:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP disruptive, nationalist editing. Jingiby ( talk) 16:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 17:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 16:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 17:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 16:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 17:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi protection. Repeated IP vandalism and disruptive editing from unregistered users. Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 13:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 15:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by unregistered user Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 14:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 18:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 20:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

23 December 2021

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined per WP:BLANKING. @ Geraldo Perez: @ Dunutubble: @ The Grand Delusion: Users, even unregistered ones, may remove comments from their talk pages...including block notices. Declined unblock requests may not be. But, block notices may be. The IP is within their privileges to remove the comments on User talk:50.104.22.14. Even if it wasn't allowed, we wouldn't protect the page when it is one IP that is acting on the page. The appropriate action (again if such removals were not allowed) would be to change the block of the IP to prevent editing their talk page. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 03:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: We have to stop silencing the dissemination of information relating to Covid 19. When an expert in their field speaks, they should not be silenced and placing a restriction on this page is done only to meet one side's ideologies. DrewAlan14 ( talk) 17:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined If anything, this page needs additional protection ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unprotected " 2019": ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access]) 50.244.129.65 ( talk) 19:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

That doesn’t explain why you want it unprotected, just the result you seek-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 19:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined No reason provided ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some IP users are deliberately vandalising the page. Diptyajit ( talk) 15:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 07:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by ip editor (block evasion) Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by ip editor (block evasion) Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 07:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced information that contradicts existing sources, previously by 187.187.192.72, now by 187.187.192.60; requesting semi-protection. Cyberlink420 ( talk) 14:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Cyberlink420 ( talk) 04:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 02:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdels. El_C 10:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended protection: IPs are removing sources and adding in things without citing a source. This is a highly sensitive subject that will probably be subject to future vandalism. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 04:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I am requesting a temporary protection in this article about a Chinese government official. There is unverified news in China that this official recently married with an divorced actress Tong Liya. I have seen that piece of information repeatedly being included into the infobox of them, which I believe violates BLP. If applicable, I would like to request a temporary protection on both articles. In Chinese Wikipedia they have already been semi-protected. Milky· Defer >Please use ping 06:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes protection: A lot of vandalism, but some non-autoconfirmed users are also making constructive edits – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 04:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Any particular examples? Some recent edits were BLP tagged but the user has been indefinitely blocked. Pending changes is a pain with lots of edits needing to be approved. Is all the recent fiddling with numbers productive? Johnuniq ( talk) 06:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
[104] [105] [106]. The numbers seem to be accurate. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 06:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Johnuniq: forgot to ping – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 06:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Re the numbers, I was wondering if minuscule adjustments are productive and a reason to avoid one-month semi protection which looks appropriate. In your three diffs of problems, one editor has been blocked indefinitely, an IP has been blocked for six months, and the third is from an editor who has made a single edit and that was silliness in the article 12 days ago. I'm happy to leave this open for other opinions on what should happen. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined as stale, please re-report if disruption resumes-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. BattleshipMan ( talk) 21:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated modification/vandalism of sourced content mostly by drive-by IPs. Gotitbro ( talk) 00:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-adding of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 02:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism 219.78.190.165 ( talk) 02:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content and disruptive lead fixing by new accounts and IPs. Asking for a perma PP as this is unlikely to subside anytime soon as the past protection log shows. Gotitbro ( talk) 03:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring against other editors with poor sources. Crossroads -talk- 06:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edit warring by multiple-IP user. BilCat ( talk) 08:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Remove pending changes protection, as this page is ec protected – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 09:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. El_C 11:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism imediatly after previous protection expired. SSSB ( talk) 11:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP updates during matches, some vandalizes, some just plain disruptive. Preferably until after the tourney ends (Jan 2, 2022). Engr. Smitty Werben 13:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by block-evading LTA Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 15:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruptive editing based on nationalism. Jingiby ( talk) 16:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or OR content by multiple IP editors and now newly-created accounts since 20 December. RA0808 talk contribs 21:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. Virtually all of the last page of edits is them and people reverting them. FDW777 ( talk) 20:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per notes at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/84.64.60.145, these pages are subject to the disruptive repeated addition of fictitious content by an IP editor working from a /13 range. Recommend 6-months of semi-protection for these pages as the editor in question has returned repeatedly to these pages, and there appears to be limited collateral impact. Jack Frost ( talk) 04:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note: I overlooked the staleness of a couple of items due to the wider LTA nature of the disruption. El_C 11:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism. Persistent removal of sourced content without discussion. 2405:204:5093:6949:B5FF:688F:5693:5BA ( talk) 08:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please stop inserting and re-inserting WP:COPYVIO to pages, IP. El_C 11:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Most recently, there's no source either made of hoaxes. Abrilando232 ( talk) 10:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Well give me a chance to write it! Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. NSAandGCHQ ( talk) 23:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Watched the remastered recently, had fun. El_C 10:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 05:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 14:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Vandalism/Disruption resumed before Musik Bot even had a chance to remove the protection template. Not a good sign. Mako001 ( talk) 12:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restored the previous protection. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are frequently adding/changing content without sources. Ab207 ( talk) 12:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – PCPP has failed with recent sock and proxy IP edits. Austronesier ( talk) 13:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

There is a misunderstanding. I am not involved in the dispute between Austronesier and JihoHone/WCF. I made an explanation about the edits I made here, and they got accepted by reviewers: /info/en/?search=Talk:Negrito#Edit_explanation:_Trying_to_restoring_useful_additions/changes_while_correcting_misrepresented_parts._~Nobuaki_H. I request a check of my edits, and constructive work. I try to improve the article and also added a Cleanup tag, which is necessary, as there are serious issues with the article in its current form. Sincerely Nobuaki H. 176.97.70.48 ( talk) 14:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for block evasion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Ohnoitsjamie: Great, thanks. Hope it works. – Austronesier ( talk) 15:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It is a highly biased reporting. Love jihad is not even an Indian language or Hindi word. Love jihad was first reported by churches of UK and later by churches of Kerala. It is the communist Govt of Kerala that confirmed it that Islamists were involved in Love jihad and drug jihad. IN UK both Christians and Sikh girls were targeted and churches an sikhi raised this objection. This does not mean Islamists did nto target Hindu girls in UK or Kerala but Hindus were the last to recognize it.

Similarly, pakistan-side is totally ignored on a daily basis Christian, sikhi, hindu and buddhist girls are kidnaaped and married to elderly muslims and convereted. But this aspect has been totally ignored. 166.70.123.182 ( talk) 13:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It is a highly biased reporting. Love jihad is not even an Indian language or Hindi word. Love jihad was first reported by churches of UK and later by churches of Kerala. It is the communist Govt of Kerala that confirmed it that Islamists were involved in Love jihad and drug jihad. IN UK both Christians and Sikh girls were targeted and churches an Sikhi raised this objection. This does not mean Islamists did not target Hindu girls in UK or Kerala but Hindus were the last to recognize it.

Similarly, on a daily basis christian, sikh, hindu and buddhist girls are kidnaaped and married to elderly muslims and convereted. But this aspect has been totally ignored on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.70.123.182 ( talk) 13:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not doneWP:SOAPBOX. Favonian ( talk) 15:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors repeatedly adding unsourced, poorly sourced and highly POV material. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Appears to be from Greeis6 going against 178.66.148.152. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS14:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from meat/sockpuppets. Woodroar ( talk) 16:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Target of an LTA – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 09:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Political opponents vandalizing the page. e.g. one edit called them terrorists. GreaterPonce665 ( TALK) 14:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content. —🎄☃️❄️ Season's greetings from AFreshStart ( talk) ❄️☃️🎄 15:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

24 December 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This is my third request in just over two days; just blocking the IPs has not been effective. Requesting extended semi-protection. Cyberlink420 ( talk) 16:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: some one is editing our details, without any facts. so kindely protect it. Bhumisena ( talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Your edits are non-encyclopedic, superfluous, and blatantly self-promotional and therefore against WP:COI. Wikipedia isn't some social media platform you can add to your website (and believe me, I am baffled you even linked that article on there on the same level as your facebook and twitter links). Your edits constitute vandalism, not the editors trying to revert it. Rajavlitra23 ( talk) 18:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: Bhumisena ( talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and edit warring. Ssilvers ( talk) 00:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I thick that need semi protection, the Hong Kong IP LTA back again the IP restore revision see. Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior HurricaneEdgar 13:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) I want to note that this is a very high-profile storm whose article is on the main page. Recent vandalism by IPs (not only the Hong Kong IP LTA). Destroyeraa ( Alternate account) 13:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Sock of a now blocked user moving the page without discussion, to a generic title. AhmadLX- (Wikiposta) 13:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior as soon as previous protection was lifted. Citobun ( talk) 14:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Lard Almighty ( talk) 14:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism going back months. It's getting to be difficult to revert the many IP and non-IP attempts to change the "fighting style" mentioned in this article. Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to allegations/rumors regarding his involvement the killing of Drakeo the Ruler. Syd Highwind ( talk) 23:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Ssilvers ( talk) 17:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uptick in vandalism. Seems to be related to activity on reddit: [107]. MrOllie ( talk) 20:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed came back once again. FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 09:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 10:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Need to resolve editions by this one editor on talk. Moxy- 23:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Just plain Bill ( talk) 23:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Another article with some COVID-19 controversy, now attracting increased drive-by deletions of content from Sydney-based IPs. Alexbrn ( talk) 12:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long-running low-level disruptive editing. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unreferenced edits from an IP user with misleading edit summaries TheHotwiki ( talk) 23:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There’s been legitimate news that should be added. https://www.fox46.com/news/u-s/north-carolina/its-over-congressman-madison-cawthorn-and-wife-seek-divorce-after-less-than-a-year/amp/ CASinCHI2 ( talk) 23:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You ring the doorbell, you don’t rip out the security system.-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 00:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
This is more an argument for an edit request on the talk page or /Edit, not for lowering the protection. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined this can be dealt with by an edit request Amortias ( T)( C) 11:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This template should be semi-protected because it has only low transclusions. Vitaium ( talk) 05:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

807 transclusions as of today. I know a couple of seasoned LTAs who'd happily make the effort to get their socks auto-confirmed, just for the purpose of vandalizing this template. Favonian ( talk) 10:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined high risk template Amortias ( T)( C) 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: because i said so 2406:E003:1850:2D01:A163:BEBA:8147:AC02 ( talk) 02:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You're going to have to come up with a much better rationale than that. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined no valid reason given Amortias ( T)( C) 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan (which also applies to Afghanistan). (CC) Tbhotch 19:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: Persistent vandalism. 125.167.59.84 ( talk) 20:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte ( talk) 15:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism DebbyBreelee ( talk) 11:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Mujeeb Rehman Bhadas ( talk) 11:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Private

Declined – No article specified. Favonian ( talk) 11:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: seems like an old dispute – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 04:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This is honestly one I could get behind. Hitting a decade on it I don’t think anyone could repeat history whether they read up on this specific one or not.-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 06:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done Anarchyte ( talk) 15:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: 6 year old content dispute. Probably stopped a while ago. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 10:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected - Lowered to pending. Anarchyte ( talk) 15:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article continues to attract disruptive editing from primarily unregistered or new editors. Snuish ( talk) 21:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist111 ( talk) 22:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 07:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBAPDS. Persistent BLP violations. ―  Tartan357  Talk 09:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: I know this is grossly irregular to ask this, but the only IP edits that the page seems to get are unconstructive forum-posting, and I've had to ask for RD/OS for some edits due to the users also posting their player ID number (generally in the context of seeking technical support). I intend to include a link to the game's official forums on the talk page shortly to try and mitigate this, but for now I'm seeking semi-protection to prevent any further unwitting self-outing (and possible edit-conflicts) while I do this.A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 03:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Nota bene: A quick search reveals the game has neither official forums or anything approaching an actual support ticket system (the "support" link on the official page literally just checks for bans). I'm still requesting indefinite semi-protection since the signal:noise ratio is so lopsided, but I will need some time to think about how I want to approach this, since the most straightforward/common-sense method is not viable. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 03:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi requested - significant POV pushing and content disputes by both IP & newly registered users. Darren-M talk 17:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0A:1228:FD38:5482:7FC3:259 ( talk) 17:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Script in Wikipedia namespace. The content model should also be changed. Qwerfjkl talk 21:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Qwerfjkl: It looks like this page should be deleted? Prior to your recent edit, Wikipedia:Date formattings/script/MOSNUM dates was last changed in January 2013. I see that Wikipedia:Date formattings#Scripts includes a link to this page, but that's likely to be an error. It says to see User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates and that page says to use User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js (last edited in August 2021‎). @ Ohconfucius: What should happen? Johnuniq ( talk) 06:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: User:Matthew McMullin has been consistently spamming bad edits to portraits on this page and either he needs to be barred from continuing to vandalize it or the page needs to be locked entirely Bsebor3 ( talk) 21:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruption 80.42.237.105 ( talk) 21:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a variety of IPs/new editors. — Chevvin 15:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

25 December 2021

Reason: high level of vandalism including suspected socking with IP.

Edit: It is again vandalised by suspected socks since last update. Sajaypal007 ( talk) 14:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer ( talk) 15:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. High profile MMA fighter, semi-protection period recently ended and the usual BLP violations and vandalism have continued. TylerBurden ( talk) 15:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection is very unusual; a year would be possible but escalation is needed to reach that and I would need good evidence. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sajaypal007 ( talk) 15:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by Sajaypal007 Lord Elzai ( talk) 15:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, content dispute-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This is a redirect and I made the protections the same as the target. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Block Evasion Lavalizard101 ( talk) 21:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring - draft is at AfC, awaiting review. Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Beshogur ( talk) 15:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

So now you accuse me of vandalism. Excellent.-- 217.149.166.11 ( talk) 15:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @217.149.166.11: Thanks for engaging at article talk but consensus appears to be against you. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs immediately after the protection expired. Ab207 ( talk) 21:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Please semi-protect for a couple of months. Ssilvers ( talk) 23:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Vitaium ( talk) 05:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Move protected indefinitely. As usual, I couldn't find any helpful guidance at WP:PROTECT but this looks appropriate. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. In last 5 days, too many edits have been made by IPs continuously, which are incorrect and disruptive, without any source or any edit summary. Dhruv edits ( talk) 09:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: An IP user (presumably just one under multiple addresses) has made the same edit removing information from the article about ten times over the last two months, and been reverted every time by multiple editors. A discussion on the subject was had in which two other editors agreed that the information could stay, but despite linking to that discussion (and proposing the IP editor start another one in the article's Talk page to explain their side of the argument) they have instead continued their crusade and ignored all other editors. It's gotten quite obnoxious at this point, and this seems like the best solution at the moment. QuietHere ( talk) 01:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. slow edit war – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 02:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:33, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This article has been vandalized 18 times since the beginning of December - targeted by single-purpose IP addresses or accounts which almost exclusively engage in vandalism. A temporary increase in protection level is warranted. Pilaz ( talk) 01:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Pilaz: I suppose it would be obvious for anyone with a clue, but all I can see is a dispute regarding whether "Peter" should be included with no explanation that I noticed. The most recent example would not be affected by semi-protection. Is protection needed due to the Peter issue? Is there an explanation somewhere why the article should be as it is (without that name)? Johnuniq ( talk) 02:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Johnuniq: In a recent Youtube video, the mother of Ahgren mistakenly called Ahgren "Peter" instead of "Ludwig" while on the phone (On Youtube "I watched EVERY Epic Rap Battle of History to answer this question", 10:18-10:25]). If I recall correctly, Peter is a relative of Ahgren, hence the confusion. This is essentially turning into a meme where his fanbase will call him "Peter" to mock him, which is very tongue-in-cheek, but that I suspect will require multiple reverts a week for at least the next week, depending on the life expectancy of this inside joke. It's uncontroversial that the subject of the article's name is Ludwig Ahgren, as it is also his stage name - having to regularly revert "Peter" joke edits on a BLP seems grounds to me for a temporary and limited increase in protection. You're right about semi-protection regarding the last comment, but that editor is an outlier since 90-95% of unhelpful edits have been made by IPs and editors with very few edits. Then again, you be the judge of what's best to do here. Pilaz ( talk) 03:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Pilaz: Let me know if more is needed, such as the editor I mentioned who would not be affected by semi-protection. You should first try engaging with them on article talk or their talk. Johnuniq ( talk) 03:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Johnuniq: Thank you, will do if the problem arises again in the future; so far I've only been templating and reverting, but I'll make sure to leave more detailed messages on their respective Talk pages if appropriate. Pilaz ( talk) 03:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits by LeBron fanboys. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 03:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Angela Criss sockpuppets keep vandalizing the page. I've seen the log and soon after protection is lifted the sockpuppets have returned. 747pilot ( talk) 03:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 03:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another year, another round of disruptive "Christmas movie" disruptive editing. $chnauzer 06:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 06:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. High profile footballer article, semi-protection recently ran out and the usual BLP violations and vandalism have continued. TylerBurden ( talk) 07:33, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site ( talk) 07:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Some disruptive editing and vandalism still occurring in the month of December. Long protection history due to persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 23:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs vandalising the page. 122.170.46.8 ( talk) 03:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 05:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 06:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Wrong statements are made to defame the film Laxmanthaletto ( talk) 07:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Long term issues on this page. Was indef semi'd back in 2015. Since then though, the COI editors have learnt to game autoconfirmed status, so this needs to be somewhat better protected. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 08:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined, I do not see much of disruption by non-extended-confirmed users. From the last 100 edits, Modulato was exytended confirmed anywat, and why IMSRINDIA was allowed to use this page I am not sure, they had less than 10 edits. But anyway, I do not see how this level of disruption is sufficient for extra protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. e.g. Special:Diff/1061844082 Special:Diff/1061877907 Special:Diff/1061916351 Special:Diff/1061980395 Cambial foliar❧ 11:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent sock puppetry. AVeganKid ( talk) 06:45, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined @ AVeganKid: Further information would be needed to explain the sockpuppetry situation—I don't see any recent edits by blocked users. The people reverting you saying that an assurance is not sufficient and the citation needs to be in the article are correct. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 07:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined @ FMSky: There are not enough recent edits to warrant protection. Also, there is nothing on the article talk page to explain what the problem is. Someone should explain the situation for new editors. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. This should only be edited by accounts with less than 500 edits. AVeganKid ( talk) 07:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps restoring unsourced content despite warnings. Armegon ( talk) 04:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done – honestly. Favonian ( talk) 15:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 14:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 14:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Please give protection for article. The users are add unsourced edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sush150 ( talkcontribs) 14:12, December 25, 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated edit warring by new account, followed by blocking of that account and then block evasion using new account. Some basic protection would help. Thanks. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 20:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite pending changes protection. The page has a low edit count, and is a battleground for religious and community matters. The vast majority of bad faith edits and attempts to remove/add unsourced information predicated on religious/community feelings is from brand new users/ips and this has been going on for many years. Examples include: flooding the infobox with an excess amount of images [108] * 15 of these types of edits in the past 2 days, [109] many of these edits trying to disrupt the timeline of the usage of the name and giving undue weight to their community, [110] removing key information for no reason. The talk page of the article also reveals that over the past decade or so there have been efforts to censor the historical usage of the name by certain religious communities. On top of that the article is already exhaustive and there is virtually nothing else substantive to add or remove. At the very least, there should be some sort of protection on the page for a few weeks or months, but indef is ideal. Aleena98 ( talk) 16:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 18:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps adding Happy Tree Friends when it's not a preschool show. FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 16:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 20:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism. Jingiby ( talk) 17:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 20:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Can we just have the article locked completely for a few days please? Its the usual "DIE HARD IS A CHRISTMAS FILM" thing that happens every December. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 19:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 20:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated edits that replace feminine pronouns, nouns with masculine ones for the subject of the article, who is a trans woman. The latest one I reverted had also added a transmisic remark in a comment up top. G kayaalp ( talk) 20:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 20:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

26 December 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of a LTA: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Charliewolf79. Thibaut ( talk) 21:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 21:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 22:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

A search for «XRP» automatically redirects to Ripple. This is unfortunate in my opinion. Saying XRP and Ripple is the sams is a bit like saying Microsoft and Windows is the same thing. They are not.

Obviously «Satoshi Nakamoto» and «Bitcoin» are seperate articles. Thus should also Ripple and XRP be separate.

If Ripple disappears tomorrow, XRP will continune to exist and function just fine. They are independent, thus should have seperate articles. Stian MP ( talk) 20:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Ripple (payment protocol) to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 20:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistant vandalism by an IP user. [111] [112] [113] [114] [115]. LittleJerry ( talk) 23:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 01:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just checking, how long are we going to let this go. It's like the Young brothers in AC/DC. - FlightTime ( open channel) 00:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 01:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The MGTOW movement is not misogynistic 2600:1700:7130:8140:98C4:E5F4:A2CB:EE44 ( talk) 02:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. (CC) Tbhotch 02:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Angela Criss’ sockpuppets just keep coming back. 747pilot ( talk) 03:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. — Chevvin 04:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsouced by IP editors. Cassiopeia talk 06:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sudden uptick of vandalism due to inclusion of his death's into ITN. please requesting temporary semi-protection for at least two days. 125.167.59.84 ( talk) 08:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism - same user, User:G123-34.HDU, constantly changing the article to suit their opinion without providing any sources. ISD ( talk) 09:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Same user, same behaviour. This article IMO cannot be semi-protected. Why not reported the user into WP:AIV. 125.167.59.84 ( talk) 09:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I have since reported the user. ISD ( talk) 09:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 09:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you. ISD ( talk) 09:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Major vandalism by Sockpuppets. Almost whole content was changed without any source. I have fixed it as of now, but need protection. Heba Aisha ( talk) 04:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced fringe content by IP. Austronesier ( talk) 10:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Sockpuppetry; redirect, so indefinite shouldn't hurt too much – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note to admin: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD ( talk) 09:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

IP vandalism High level of IP vandalism. Eperi ( talk) 12:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)eperi reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 14:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Less Unless ( talk) 18:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant unsourced edits & troll edits by IPs. Some of them seem to be promotional edits, others are repeatedly changing her DoB to random dates. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 14:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Name changed here because article was moved from Akshara Reddy to Draft:Akshara Reddy.  MelanieN ( talk) 18:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit dispute: I and another editor are involved in a dispute with an individual who has used two different IPs to revert. Jerm ( talk) 15:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit warring.  MelanieN ( talk) 18:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is the name of a river in Russia, a tributary of the Lena Xufanc ( talk) 14:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 20:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. CodeTalker ( talk) 19:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 19:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of cited content by multiple IP editors. RA0808 talk contribs 20:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 20:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zander251 ( talk) 21:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

27 December 2021

Reason: Persistent vandalism, against Three revert rule – Recent increase in vandalism by several anonymous IPs in the past week, mobilized from mutiple IP addresses which assume to be controlled by the same person or group making mostly similar controversial edits. [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] The behaviour has been warned by different editors with request of building consensus before keeping on reversions but were all disregarded, and giving no relevant reason for the change. LVTW2 ( talk) 16:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • User:LVTW2 is right. I also support article protection, I just create a notification on this page, the User:LVTW2 was faster than me. Topic of "Potential superpowers" is a controversial topic, a cold outlook and a willingness to consensus are needed, IPs make controversial changes and they create an edit-war with no ethics whatsoever. An example is the current edit-war created by variable IP 117.233 (117.228, and similar). Even though a discussion thread is open (in talk page), which shows that its changes violate Wikipedia rules, IP does not discuss or want to wait for any consensus. Semi-protection indefinite is the most sensible option for this article. Subtropical-man ( | en-2) 17:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after previous protection expired. SSSB ( talk) 16:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor ( talk) 22:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalized by anon editors over a period of weeks. pburka ( talk) 22:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Too many vandalism - the eviction table has been completely messed up. It's just been 84 days and there are eviction results of day 90 and 91, very much vandalism here. Praveentech ( talk) 18:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: It's an ongoing show and this needs to be at least semi-protected from new users or guests who have not logged in. I have tried to maintain the integrity, but now it definitely needs some protection. The edits are too many. Praveentech ( talk) 18:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton ( talk) 00:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The most recent vandal has been blocked from editing this article, but there are others.  MelanieN ( talk) 02:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Vandalism, fake news/numbers, unsorced changes and edit war from registered users, watch also this-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 16:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Feels more like disagreement about adding new content/content dispute for me. 36.77.102.62 ( talk) 22:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing semi-protection appears to be doing its job. I see a few controversial or reverted edits, but the editors who made them are extended confirmed, so EC protection would not have prevented them.   MelanieN ( talk) 00:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:WAR by A1E6. He continuously revert my edits totally ignoring all the arguments. He considers the obvious consequence from a peer-reviewed publication as an original research, probably due to lack of analytic number theory understanding. Droog Andrey ( talk) 17:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The two of you disagree over content. Protection would not help, since both of you are extended confirmed editors. I suggest you ask for input from other editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics.   MelanieN ( talk) 00:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is not a single productive edit from non-EC accounts in over a year. TrangaBellam ( talk) 20:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing indefinite semi-protection is working well. There are some problem edits by extended confirmed users, and EC protection would not prevent them. Problem edits by non-EC accounts are pretty uncommon, maybe one or two a month. These issues can be handled by normal page watching.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 152,000 transclusions. These are in talk pages not articles, but this is still too much visibility for a completely unprotected template. (This template is exempt from MusikBot's protection due to its name starting "Template:Wikiproject".). User:GKFX talk 11:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitely. BusterD ( talk) 08:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent reverts by IP users with no edit summaries (i.e. unexplained disruptive reverts). Rockcodder ( talk) 06:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 08:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ctrlwiki08:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 08:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Vitaium ( talk) 13:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitely. BusterD ( talk) 09:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Please. Do this immediately. Lectrician2 ( talk) 06:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: edit warring concerning first sentence, see [121], [122] & [123]. I suggest that this version be restored since it reflects the previous long-term consensus. Phlsph7 ( talk) 09:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 10:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The page is about a TV show, but a large number of IPs are attempting to add BLPs of otherwise non notable minors. The page should be restricted to avoid it being a fan shrine full of children's bios in violation of wp:blpprivacy, wp:dob, and wp:blp1e. The constant additions include children under 1 year old who are neither notable or able to consent to having these details shared 107.115.5.124 ( talk) 10:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of a particular bit of unsourced nonsense by IPs, going back years. Page history speaks for itself. Lennart97 ( talk) 11:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various auto-confirmed accounts are insisting the country's name has changed to Turkiye. It may well change, but apart from one Turkish state media outlet nobody is currently reporting this change or using this spelling. This will need to be indefinite unless the protecting admin will make sure to restore indefinite semi-protection on expiration. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Looks more like requested move argument for me. Why you not warned these users to encourage them to discuss the issue (RM) on talk page. 36.77.102.62 ( talk) 04:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. El_C 14:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator AmandaNP. El_C 14:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. WikiLinuz🍁( talk) 05:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 11:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A series of disruptive, trivia-related edits from Maryland IPs that started in May 2021, and it appears as if sock accounts are getting involved. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 12:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor uses different IPs to dodge 3RR. Unexplained removal of well-sourced information (the references can't honestly get better). The IP editor will just return with different accounts to keep up their disruption. Semsûrî ( talk) 14:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Valereee. El_C 14:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People keep on making bold merge without forming consensus in Talk:Cesena F.C. . I don't care the practice in it-wiki that house all related clubs in one article but this is en-wiki and the new user(or "admin" that stale for so long) does not try to understand the rule. Matthew hk ( talk) 01:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined. Matthew hk, at least wrt December: the user's last edit was on the 26th — you gave them a warning on the 27th. El_C 14:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBIPA. ―  Tartan357  Talk 06:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 14:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. One user has once in November been adding Woody Harrelson as Bowser when it's actually Jack Black, and also another has been adding Jerry Trainor, Grey Griffin, Jeff Bennett and Daran Norris when it has not been sourced. This should only be edited by accounts with less than 500 edits, so I am thinking an extended-confirmed protection for this one. AVeganKid ( talk) 06:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Meme notwithstanding. El_C 14:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of cited, relevant information by multiple similar IPs. Cerebral726 ( talk) 15:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of non-notable awards with insufficient significant coverage from reliable secondary sources by IPs and suspected IP turned newly registered user. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 16:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Favonian ( talk) 20:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from various IPs. tgeorgescu ( talk) 18:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 18:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Already done. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. It restarted the second the page got unprotected. Super Ψ Dro 20:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already done. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

28 December 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IPv6 vandalism. almost daily occurrence. – robertsky ( talk) 17:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 22:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IPv6 vandal on Singapore/Malaysia soccer pages. – robertsky ( talk) 17:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkl talk 21:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done GFOLEY  FOUR!01:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IPv6 vandal on 2405:3800 block across Singapore/Malaysia soccer pages. – robertsky ( talk) 17:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 22:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent violations of the BLP policy. Last 50 revisions were predominantly vandalism/vandalism reverting. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS01:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 06:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Been over a month our IP friend keeps adding smae images ...lets try getting them to talk. Moxy- 04:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 06:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on the page with unexplained and unsourced removal and edits. Please add protection to this page from the vandalism caused by IPs. MehmoodS ( talk) 19:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 06:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 22:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Daniel ( talk) 06:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced additions by IPs — El Millo ( talk) 23:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 06:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Yowashi ( talk) 00:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 06:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Upload protection consistent attempts to alter the poster from its confirmed American theatrical release poster with other variations of this poster or others completely. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done, upload protected for three months.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Please do this indefinitely. I don't have access until Wednesday. Never unprotect it like The Frozen Ground never did, due to disruptive editing. Someone keeps changing the title to some kind of gross name. AVeganKid ( talk) 06:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I said indefinitely, not March 28, 2022. AVeganKid ( talk) 07:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I am sorry but this is not you who decides.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I do not see any reason for an indefinite protection right now. The page has only been protected once before.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection disruptive editing. Some dude keeps changing the title to something used in a bad word. Do NOT find an unprotection date. Keep it semi-protected indefinitely. That's what I say. AVeganKid ( talk) 06:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner ( talk) 07:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: This LTA is targeting particular articles. The last time, I had to go through them individually to send the articles to RFPP. Please protect all of them for 6 months. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 01:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Doing it from the bottom of the list, it will take some time-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Done-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing from the last page protection. Yolo4A4Lo ( talk) 06:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, including BLP violations. Ongoing at least since November. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 08:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – There has been a spate of IP addresses, including from a registered user, changing the person's photo to a totally unrelated person and then reverting. Not sure what is going on. Seloloving ( talk) 08:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The Angela Criss socks are back!. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Daniel ( talk) 06:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For one week. As 2021 is about to end, many IP editors will change when the year starts this weekend. ApprenticeWiki work 02:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel ( talk) 06:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism. The page has seen increased viewership and edits since the bill has been in the news. aaronneallucas ( talk) 03:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel ( talk) 06:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Loafiewa ( talk) 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel ( talk) 06:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are helpful, only to Steph Curry. They only update Curry's numbers, not the other players. This makes the table partially correct and it's a handful of work to update everyone just to make the table fully correct. I'm requesting indefinite until Curry retires, but if it's not possible, I'm still requesting temporary protection. Engr. Smitty Werben 18:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from one IP, there will be more, I suspect. tgeorgescu ( talk) 18:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and tendentious editing by IP user reinstating the Hungarian name of the city of Cluj-Napoca on its article's infobox. This has been going since 2020 [124], if not 2018 [125], 2014 [126] or 2010... [127]. Temporary semi-protection won't fix the issue. Super Ψ Dro 18:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull ( talk) 19:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel ( talk) 06:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – A very controversial article. It has attracted vandalism again since its protection expired in November. Vacant0 ( talk) 22:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Vacant0, FYI: it's rare to go straight to WP:ECP without applying semi first and it proving insufficient. El_C 09:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPS — El Millo ( talk) 06:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Yeah, and I want it protected indefinitely due to the disruptive editing IPS is causing on that page, just like Venom: Let There Be Carnage and The Batman are.— AVeganKid ( talk) 06:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes protection: BLP Policy Violations. Long term issues with people saying that he has died, with no sources whatsoever. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 10:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Giving it a trial for an extended period and then we can see what happens after that. Daniel ( talk) 10:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Sandboxes should not be protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Pppery: any idea why it is showing up being used in articles? — xaosflux Talk 00:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Job queue lag following it being accidentally used in Template:WikidataCheck in Special:Diff/1029194849. Null editing any article using the template will cause the transclusion to disappear. Somewhat ironically, I discovered this while cleaning up sandboxes being used in articles. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Donexaosflux Talk 01:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page was protected 6 years ago over 2 instances of vandalism. Its unlikely that this specific article will be vandal-bait. SuperSkaterDude45 ( talk) 08:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done Agree with rationale and protecting administrator not active on project. Daniel ( talk) 10:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Please delete this protected talkpage, or as an alternate (if the talkpage history needs to be kept for some reason), please delete the two project banners from the talkpage. It makes no sense for hoax subpages to have project banners, or to have talkpages. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 23:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: Could be edited to force the user to install a malicious script. Qwerfjkl talk 12:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Question: Qwerfjkl, how so? Only 63 transclusions. El_C 14:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ El C: While it has few transclusions, it could be modified so that the install link installs a malicious script instead of the intended one. ―  Qwerfjkl talk 15:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Qwerfjkl: I'm unable to verify that assertion, so I'm gonna leave this request to someone else. El_C 16:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ El C: Here's an example:
Normal: reply-link ( source)
Edited: reply-link ( source)
Run script installer on this page once
Note the behaviour of the 'install' links. ―  Qwerfjkl talk 17:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Qwerfjkl: I'm not qualified to act on this request. El_C 17:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi Qwerfjkl, if the security of a userscript (here: "script-installer") depends on the stability of a template, that's a security issue in the script. As the maintainer of the script is an administrator, they can protect any pages that really need to be protected. Please contact them instead. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I've just noticed it's a gadget, even. I'll ask Enterprisey. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
On hold pending input from Enterprisey. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Template protected. Mitigation: script-installer now puts the name of the user in the popup warning. ("Warning! Do you trust User:Example?"). I'll also put it under TE; better safe than sorry, there are probably still security considerations, and it's not like people edit this frequently anyway. Enterprisey ( talk!) 04:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SpheralCobra ( talk) 06:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 09:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is pending changes so IPs could still edit the page. However, after the protection was added in 2013, only a handful of edits were made by IPs so I could say that PC protection (yet alone an indefinite protection) is not really needed anymore. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotected agree with rationale and protecting administrator isn't active on project currently. Cheers, Daniel ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: No unprotection date should be selected. Persistent disruptive editing. Someone put Caillou in the cast. Therefore, it should say this only, "This page is semi-protected", and that's it. AVeganKid ( talk) 06:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined per this. Daniel ( talk) 10:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: I’ve seen a lot of unsourced edits on here, such as claims of Randy Miller composing the score for the Disneyland version and John Debney composing score for the Walt Disney World version. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 09:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I think the pending changes protection is working as intended.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined agree PCP is working as it should be. Daniel ( talk) 10:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent IP-disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 10:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Daniel ( talk) 10:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Continued unsourced BLP violations: changes to date of birth, education, appearances. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 11:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the template hasn't been updated in 4 months . Ltqk2 ( talk) 11:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined - protecting administrator not consulted as per requirements. Daniel ( talk) 10:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Protection could be removed as there was not much disruption before protection — DaxServer ( talk) 18:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined - @ DaxServer: the protecting administrator, Plastikspork, is active on the project; please discuss with them at their talk page first before requesting here. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 10:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hello Admins i need to add source and citations.And have also clean the unwanted texts. Please allow me or tell me how can i add sources. Ar1a1yan ( talk) 15:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined not discussed with protecting administrator as required. Further, request seems to be better suited to using {{ edit semi-protected}}. Daniel ( talk) 10:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita Nk350241 ( talk) 05:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

information Note: Can you explain what edits you would like made and provide any sources required to support those edits? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 06:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined, stale. Daniel ( talk) 10:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Spam and disruptive editing – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 11:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel ( talk) 11:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP repeatedly removing sourced information. Number 5 7 12:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and change in the name of main cast and the description of characters 2409:4063:4205:4F8E:690C:C703:5BD4:273E ( talk) 12:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week], after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The reason was related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Just because someone was born in Israel doesn't mean they're related to the conflict (I think?) I am a new editor and I wanted to add more info there. Thanks! If I misunderstood something than please leave me a message. Jishiboka1 ( talk) 06:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined - @ Jishiboka1: per the instructions highlighted in yellow when you edited the page to add this request, "Please post requests in this section for removing or reducing the protection level of a page if the protecting admin is inactive or you have already asked them." The protecting administrator, Ymblanter, is active on the project; I cannot find any record of you fulfiling this step. Daniel ( talk) 10:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The article is related to the PI topics and previously experienced disruption. It is in scope of the arbitration case, and I do not see why protection should be lifted.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing over several days by changing IP (one blocked). MB 17:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 17:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been just too much persistent vandalism going on here. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 17:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start from here. Less Unless ( talk) 17:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Akhouri Rishabh ( talk) 13:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Please make some uprotection

Declined – Neither article name nor rationale provided. Favonian ( talk) 13:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I would’ve just removed the request if it wasn’t for the unsigned comment-- CreecregofLife ( talk) 15:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing libel and vandalism. Requesting semi-protection to block unverified users. Jcejhay ( talk) 12:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Highly Visible Template. 1807 transclusions Qwerfjkl talk 12:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done The template has already been semi-protected since 2008, and the current transclusion count is well below that established at WP:HIGHRISK for inherently warranting ECP or template-protection. Hog Farm Talk 17:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by unregistered users in the last couple of weeks. Given that there has been no productive contributions to this article from an IP user in many years, while it repeatedly attracts vandalism and disruption, I suggest considering indefinite semi-protection both of the article and of its Talk page. — kashmīrī  TALK 14:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias ( T)( C) 16:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP addresses have continue to do disruptive editing by rearranging the cast order to personal preference (ignoring MOS:TVCAST) and replacing reliable sources with other sources again ever since the semi-protection expired on December 21st. — YoungForever (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 21:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP vandalism. – robertsky ( talk) 11:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 21:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Vitaium ( talk) 13:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitelyMelanieN ( talk) 21:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism IceCuba ( talk) 16:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hog Farm Talk 17:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Rotating IP adding unsourced contents daily. Seloloving ( talk) 20:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Daniel ( talk) 21:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This article is misleading. Chasa are not belongs to shudra Varna. Plz delete it. S Das0406 ( talk) 16:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – This should have been discussed on the article talk page, but you screwed it up by making legal threats and getting yourself blocked. Favonian ( talk) 17:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The talk page disruption and repetitive edit requests which led to short-term protection last time have not stopped since it expired, so reinstating it and with a longer duration would be the logical next step. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 17:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It probably took you longer to write this up than it would have taken to WP:AGF and write a polite reply to the singular talk page post that seemed to have inspired this request. 2600:1012:B020:168D:F04E:1DD9:3950:6084 ( talk) 20:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 21:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long-term abuse User:Birdsflyinghigh123 WikiBayer ( talk) 18:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Daniel ( talk) 21:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New users creating drafts at this title instead of intended titles. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. and redirect restored. Daniel ( talk) 21:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent MOS:DERRY violations by many IPs. FDW777 ( talk) 19:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 21:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

29 December 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Kaltenmeyer ( talk) 19:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 21:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Controversial COVID article again attracting disruptive drive-by editing. Should probably be semi'd until the pandemic is a less hot topic (6 month in first instance?). Alexbrn ( talk) 20:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done just one IP recently, and they're currently discussing on the talk page. If edit warring recommences, at that point a block should be considered. Daniel ( talk) 21:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruption by a couple of new accounts. VQuakr ( talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done technically its a content dispute, so I would have to full protect. Instead, I have left warnings for the two new editors, to stop edit warring and go to talk page, noting there are DS for climate change. VQuakr if the edit warring continues, please let me know and I will take further action. Daniel ( talk) 21:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer ( talk) 17:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined not BLP violations Daniel ( talk) 21:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, grossly insulting material in a BLP article. Austronesier ( talk) 23:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism continuing after expiration of previous PP. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 00:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Poorly sourced or outsourced content. Madden has passed away and things are going back and forth right now. Swagging ( talk) 00:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HighInBC. El_C 01:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Harry Reid recently died and there has been a litany of edits that are either vandalism, false information, or both. snood 1205 01:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Moncrief. For the bot. El_C 01:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an edit war with an IP editor who was trying to rewrite the plot and making Mike and Sulley out to be the real villains. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 00:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. /64 blocked 3 months. El_C 01:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Someone keeps on editing the motto to a unsourced claim, "We Horse". This has been going on for months, so a short term protection will not do justice. The IP changes, so AIV will not work. A permanent, or at least a protection for the next 6 months should be fine. Semi protection would be good, as it won't even allow him to edit without a account. If they get a account and vandalize I'l bring it to AIV. Cheers! Lectrician2 ( talk) 01:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not even active enough for pending changes. Three total edits in December, none in November, just one in October. This isn't a good candidate for administrative intervention at this time. @ Lectrician2: courtesy ping. El_C 01:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: prevent this stuff from happening, additionally, not much reason for a non ec editor to edit this policy page – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 01:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi AssumeGoodWraith, this would be a rather severe precedent for very few cases a year. Unlikely to happen without a discussion at WP:AN, either before, or afterwards.
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – From Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Global_cooling: Persistent tendentious profringe editing by a suspected sockpuppeteer. No autoconfirmed accounts are suspected to be involved, but some of them clearly met the age requirement at time of last edit. Some of the suspicious edits date back as early as February. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 02:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done yet, declined as a content dispute by Daniel before. I'm currently waiting for the result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pi Variant. Please add any available evidence to the SPI. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 03:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 05:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Warring edits, unsourced information, vandalism 2601:58B:4202:4760:D22:2EA8:D3B6:626D ( talk) 03:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Awful BLP violations... Daniel ( talk) 05:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated cut&paste moves by new users. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 05:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: A user who has admitted they were involved in an old legal dispute with the article subject has been adding improperly sourced information about the case that may potentially violate BLP and COI policies. I removed it over a week ago, and it has been added back by the user threatening legal action towards Wikipedia if removed again. For that reason, I am not willing to remove it. ToQ100gou ( talk) 05:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined will be looking into the content to see what is a BLP violation here and what isn't. Daniel ( talk) 05:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing. Because the editor has put bad words in the title name, you already know how long this should be protected for. But if the disruptive editing was not bad and it didn't get cuss words put in it, I would be fine with for a while. But for this and F9 since they have bad words, AVeganKid ( talk) 05:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined
User(s) blocked. Daniel ( talk) 05:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. I made a deal with Ymblanter last night, and as long as the pages don't get put cuss words in them, they could be protected for either a month or more than that if there's no cuss words. But for this one, this guy keeps putting cuss words if you can't even tell. Maybe we could keep this indefinite since both this and Cats have once been protected for a year during the COVID-19 pandemic. AVeganKid ( talk) 05:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined
User(s) blocked. Daniel ( talk) 05:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 07:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 09:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism and BLP issue by ips about spouse that is consistent with what is going on with Venus Lux. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 09:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Duplicate article of United States. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 08:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Daniel ( talk) 09:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I've had a request on my talk page for indefinite semi-protection. As a regular editor of the article I of course shouldn't do this myself, but a quick review suggests that almost every IP edit is an attempt to add fringe to the article, thus my request for protection. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doug I've gone for a year, can re-evaluate and re-apply at that point if it starts up again. Cheers, Daniel ( talk) 09:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite full protection - enforcement of AfD decision, has been repeatedly recreated, has previously been co-ordinated on Facebook group dedicated to the subject - for further reading, please see ANI archive and user talk convo, plus the current ANI discussion which led to blocking of one editor. I imagine there will be more coming, based off the external canvassing seen prior. Requesting rather than just doing myself, I don't think I'm technically involved, but better to be safe than sorry... Daniel ( talk) 04:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Hey Daniel. Sorry, but I don't see how fully protecting makes sense. Even going straight to WP:ECP seems like a bit of an overreaction — though seeing as it is a redirect, in a practical sense who really cares (and, if someone is willing to make 500 useful edits just to be able to restore that content then be blocked, that's pretty worth it, I think!).
In any case, one IP (Dec 11) and one confirmed user (Dec 24) have restored the content after the AfD was closed (Dec 1), so, yeah, let's do indef semi for now. Again, more for the optics / projection of good faith. Perhaps the off-wiki folks will get the hint from that and move on. Feel free to relist or to just contact me personally for an ECP upgrade. Best, El_C 11:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by IP hoppers. HistoryofIran ( talk) 10:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption altering the sourced numbers. HistoryofIran ( talk) 11:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: repeated additions, by anon IPs and SPAs of "Old Goosebump Arms" as a nickname without any good source(s) Martinevans123 ( talk) 11:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. El_C 12:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Currently being hit by IP-changing sock of User:Patrick Mcdermott25 - along with other articles. 10mmsocket ( talk) 11:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 12:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Currently being hit by IP-changing sock of User:Patrick Mcdermott25 - along with other articles. 10mmsocket ( talk) 11:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Xhamaribaateinx ( talk) 10:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 10:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Indefinite protection is needed since disruption continues. Semsûrî ( talk) 11:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Request for Semi-protection or Pending Changes Protection due to recent IP Vandalism from different IP addresses. --- CX Zoom(he/him) ( let's talk| contribs) 12:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Kindly remove Fahmaan Khan as Aryan from the Main Cast and add his name and introduction in the recurring cast. Xhamaribaateinx ( talk) 10:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 10:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being hit by IP-changing sock of User:Patrick Mcdermott25 - along with other articles. 10mmsocket ( talk) 11:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 12:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Request to add the protection back, persistent anon disruption. ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 12:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of indefinetley, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 13:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: The protection is no longer necessary because this infobox element name is temporary IUPAC name and also, this template only has 2 transclusions. Vitaium ( talk) 12:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Unprotectedxaosflux Talk 15:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated page of nonexistent user. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 13:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by requestor On second thought, never mind. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 13:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Five IP addresses have repeatedly added that a random person with a person website and youtube channel has rated the film, but this is not notable information that belongs in the article, as I have had to repeatedly revert. Please protect for a week. Reywas92 Talk 14:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with 3 days and see Less Unless ( talk) 16:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this related to a group of people from my state Odisha and we have the rights to edit if we feel something information provided is misleading and not based on proper evidence ....... . S Das0406 ( talk) 12:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – You already have two active discussions at Talk:Chasa (caste). That's where it's going to be decided, not by edit warring. Favonian ( talk) 12:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: With poor performance of English cricket team, page of their coach is an outlet for many angry fans. Has already received some vandalism. With two more matches to go, good idea to protect it. MaskedSinger ( talk) 15:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 16:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Less Unless: How much is necessary in order to justify it? MaskedSinger ( talk) 16:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply
MaskedSinger, there were 3 edits that can be considered vandalism yesterday, all were reverted and none came back. Today nothing happened. I believe it's too early to protect the page, we don't do it preemptively. Best, Less Unless ( talk) 16:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Less Unless Ok cool. I understand. Thank you for explaining and doing such a great job here :) MaskedSinger ( talk) 16:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism the past few hours. Wordopia ( talk) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Amortias. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring through multiple ip addresses, user also likely a sock account of banned puppet-master Telsho. The user waging the edit war has now used three separate proxies to make these edits, 211.247.106.163, 119.200.56.206, and 1.254.120.131 CASalt ( talk) 15:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced edits by IPv6 (which appears to rotate/renew daily. previous IPv6 ranges have been blocked) editor on Singapore/Malaysia soccer pages. – robertsky ( talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Mike Novikoff 21:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: About time that guy finds another talk page to abuse. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 13:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Fade258 ( talk) 16:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated spam. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 21:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also blocked the current spammer, let's see if that helps. Euryalus ( talk) 22:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

30 December 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced edits by IPv6 (which appears to rotate/renew daily. previous IPv6 ranges have been blocked) editor on Singapore/Malaysia soccer pages. – robertsky ( talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 00:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Controversial COVID article now descended to mayhem from drive-by IPs. ECP wise until pandemic is over (6 months in first instance?). Alexbrn ( talk) 19:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Doug WellerMelanieN ( talk) 00:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained removals of the station's logo. (Similar disruption by similar IPs resulted in semi-protection of the article for sister station WICC (AM) last month.). WCQuidditch 20:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Article to be accepted at WP:AFC. Article salted in 2017 due to promo but now it's good to go. Protecting admin was active more than a week ago. Cheers Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 20:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected Draft article is certainly an improvement on the previous spammed version but it doesn't appear to have been accepted at AFC yet. Protection can be changed when this has occurred? -- Euryalus ( talk) 21:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced edits by IPv6 (which appears to rotate/renew daily. previous IPv6 ranges have been blocked) editor on Singapore/Malaysia soccer pages. – robertsky ( talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP and Jerry Lee Lewis' 9th toe colliding each other (to vandal) to add "homosexual" and wrong information. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:5940:C794:92CE:C5BD ( talk) 02:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, Infinite Darkness kinda sucked. Gah, I was thinking of Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City. Can I not get my Resident Evils right? There's only like 300 of em. Infinite Darkness wasn't that great either, though... El_C 02:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Its safe to say that all Resident Evil films sucks except their games. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:5940:C794:92CE:C5BD ( talk) 03:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
👍 Like. But I'll admit that there are some guilty pleasures there for me in the film franchise. El_C 03:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by a single person who has now moved between three IPs to change the age of death. Seloloving ( talk) 03:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. There is a dispute over her age by some editors and people continue to add unsourced information in violation of WP:BLPPRIVACY. snood 1205 03:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Thanks! snood 1205 04:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
No problem, Snood1205. BTW, I heard that Euphoria (Israeli TV series) is pretty meh, and that the US version even more so, but haven't seen either myself. El_C 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User keeps vandalising the page in an edit war. -> JLL9T ( talk) 03:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: IP has only received level two warnings. Suggest warning (and if that doesn't work, blocking) IP before resorting to protection. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GFOLEY  FOUR!03:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is still receiving plenty of disruptive edits. Series season just complete so interest should wane in a couple of weeks. Nemov ( talk) 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This one definitely did not suck! El_C 04:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continual IP deletion of a fact that is uncomfortable to some people but quite well sourced and clearly academic consensus. Wickedjacob ( talk) 04:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 07:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior. Citobun ( talk) 07:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increase level of extended-confirmed protection, due to vandalism (for autoconfirmed users) 49.150.112.127 ( talk) 04:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I do not see any disruption by autoconfirmed users since at least 20 November.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Indefinite semi-protection is already a pretty severe measure, and it does seem to work. The disruption from 20 November was made using a compromised extended-confirmed account that would have edited through extended-confirmed protection as well. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The history of the article shows a repeated removal of relevant information on the topic of the geometry of the standard 5-cube compound, specifically regarding its relationship of icosahedral symmetry to octahedral symmetry through the pyritohedral symmetry that links the symmetry groups (illustrated with an octahedrally symmetric 5-cube compound). The removal of that information seems to be vandalism based on an opinion that the article is required to mention one 5-cube compound only, which isn't something reflected in a number of other articles on compound solids, or even other articles on other specific geometric solids in general. Most articles on similar and related topics include notes of the ways that they connect to geometries that are related to them. The information that is being removed is entirely in keeping with what types of information are maintained in every other similar article. And given what information people may be trying to find by searching for the article (i.e. what symmetric compounds of 5 cubes are known at all), the information obviously isn't something that should be absent. There also isn't currently any general-purpose article dedicated solely to curating a list of symmetric 5-cube compounds. Most likely, such a list should be included in this article, though, since the article is there to provide information on what a compound of 5 cubes is (hence the article's title not actually being "regular compound of 5 cubes" specifically). Also, even taking the article to be focused on the regular compound of 5 cubes, the information that has been removed a few times is relevant information on what symmetric transformations the regular 5-cube compound can undergo. The information that has been removed is information that relates directly to the article, whether it is taken as specific or general. And the reasons for its removal are vandalism clearly based on personal opinion, rather than on the article being kept informative.

The vandalism isn't extremely frequent, but has happened enough to be of concern to the article's integrity. Maybe there is a better solution. But renaming the article to "regular compound of 5 cubes" to focus only on one example would not be in keeping with the rest of the articles on compound solids, and creating a separate article to list symmetric compounds of 5 cubes doesn't seem needed, especially because the two would link to each anyway and heavily overlap in contents, and would realistically need to be merged in the end anyway. So protection for the information included seems the best way to keep the article as helpfully informative as it ought to be. 74.106.20.33 ( talk) 08:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

This is not "vandalism".
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. KyleJoan talk 12:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP disruption since about December 24 Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior has again waited out the page protection. Citobun ( talk) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Controversy section constantly being removed. Please lock the page. Thank you. Pacific29 ( talk) 13:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Alok Vaid-Menon reply

Not done The "controversy" section you keep adding has not be reliably sourced; per WP:BLPRS, obscure pop culture sites are not appropriate sources for biographies of living persons. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 15:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 16:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Date changing by IPs. When unprotected, the vandalism starts again. wizzito | say hello! 16:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was unprotected. Shadow4dark ( talk) 16:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced material by new and unregistered users. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 16:59, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 17:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 17:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users, please note that User:Jellywings19 and User:Sarah Carvalho's socks seem to be treating this as a sort of battleground. Most of the IP edits are actually EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 17:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent unsourced changes to BO figures by IP/new users. Ab207 ( talk) 13:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Currently subject of controversy in the aviation community. Multiple edits violating WP:V; WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. M16A3NoRecoilHax ( talk) 15:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 21:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 21:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeatedly recreated. 2001:16A2:EDE8:1900:4827:988C:873:AEF0 ( talk) 17:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of forever, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hog Farm Talk 21:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Subject came out as non-binary on 29 December 2021 and there has already been an attempt to violate MOS:GENDERID. Per my understanding of WP:ARBGS, I believe this page should be protected in some form. Bizarre Bizarre Talk modern to me 21:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Rep for Jessie Andrews: The Clue Bot keeps reverting to the old page when we need to make immediate changes to Jessie's page. Ktrap1997 ( talk) 22:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

RA0808 is a human. Also, most protection levels would be pointless, and full protection would be excessive at this point. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

31 December 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Date-changing vandal from Malaysia. Citobun ( talk) 13:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – editors repeatedly adding copyright violating images, images are requested to be to deleted on commons, but this keeps going on. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: New user has continued the cycle of IP vandalism that has plagued this article for months, despite several explanations. – Rhain 15:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:59, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring. Dewritech ( talk) 15:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Semi-protection period for this page recently ended, and persistent vandalism has continued. I feel it needs either long term (several months) or indefinite semi-protection or Pending changes protection. TylerBurden ( talk) 19:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

One month for now, but I'll happily re-protect for longer durations if that doesn't help. Please keep me updated. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Loafiewa ( talk) 20:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing, and from socks — DaxServer ( talk) 20:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued warring after ban of earlier sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 21:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued warring after ban of earlier sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 21:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued warring after ban of earlier sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 21:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued warring after ban of earlier sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 21:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued warring after ban of earlier sock. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 21:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: New user has continued the cycle of IP vandalism that has plagued this article for months, despite several explanations. – Rhain 15:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. El_C 09:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a variety of new account names, some offensive signed, Willondon ( talk) 15:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator JBW. El_C 09:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is another edit war regarding if Jeff Bergman is still voicing Tweety or not, as he hasn’t reportedly voiced the character since 2018, before Looney Tunes Cartoons and Space Jam: A New Legacy came out. Brian K. Tyler ( talk) 16:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new users (possibly from the same person) keeps changing the capital name. Ue3lman ( talk) 19:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect hijacking; carried over from similar redirect Jan adhikar party. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and new users, possibly from the same person. It continues after an earlier block expired. Esiymbro ( talk) 00:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism has started even before the new year has commenced. Deaths in 20XX have always been semi-protected. Thanks. WWGB ( talk) 01:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of section blanking/vandalism by new accounts. Previous protection expired. AllOtherNamesWereTaken ( talk) 01:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring and spamming regarding 2021 redistricting process. Edits from user Snooganssnoogans express personal opinions, rather than facts from sources or links to the redistricting maps in question. To ensure the integrity of the information currently displayed, please protect this page and add appropriate protections from future occurrences. EaziGH ( talk) 03:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – User keeps recreating this page, even after it's been draftified and deleted several times. Waddles  🗩  🖉 03:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 10:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: There will be silly edits and reverts as new years hits over different time zones (already showing up on talk page). Most efficient course to semi protect until it's 2022 everywhere. agtx 04:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: There will be silly edits and reverts as new years hits over different time zones. Most efficient course to semi protect until it's 2022 everywhere. agtx 04:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The IP is back again. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 01:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of BusterD, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Ugh, I can't read (still). Sorry about that, fellow humans and replicants. Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And didn't even ap it, couldn't even get the mistake right jjjjjjj. El_C 10:33, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: A lot of unsourced edits, personal commentary, POV additions, and violating WP:PW/MOS by IP users in last 48H. Mann Mann ( talk) 05:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bera niladri19 🌀🌀 07:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. Many of the contribs from IPs starting in 36, 115 and 180 are actually likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. Many of the IP contribs starting in 36, 115 and 180 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. Many of the contribs from IPs starting in 36, 115, and 180 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. Many of the contribs from IPs starting in 36, 115 and 180 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. The contribs from IPs starting in 115 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. The contribs from IPs starting in 115 and 180 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Also persistent addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. The contribs from IPs starting in 36, 115 and 180 are likely EWLO. Mako001  (C)   (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Very frequent changes of spouse to " Emily Dickinson" for the past month. Dickinson's page has received pending changes protection for the same reason. —  The Most Comfortable  Chair 10:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of listicles by multiple IPs (likely same person) supported by Kpopstarz which is a unreliable source as per WP:KO/RS#UR since start of December 2021. I have reverted it like 5 times already but the multiple IPs just couldn't be bothered. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 10:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Following editors from Engineers India Limited are editing this page;

- RPSkokie ( talk) 09:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: RPSkokie, I think this might be more of a matter for WP:COIN. El_C 10:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you. Raising the issue at WP:COIN. RPSkokie ( talk) 10:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply
No problem, RPSkokie.  Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 17:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: persistent disruptive editing of unsourced content by new, anonymous and unregistered users like 2409:4073:2E80:8654:E504:FEAD:5BC1:88B0, 2409:4073:2199:4781:2581:3483:D3C2:F91A, 2409:4073:2E9C:C952:2083:E02C:21FB:F04E, 2409:4073:2E9C:C952:B996:CB32:A262:1803, and 2409:4073:2E9C:C952:B996:CB32:A262:1803, The Doom Patrol. Removing content and fact! Vikcycircuit ( talk) 11:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Need Protection for this page

Declined, please discuss at the talk page of the article.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent spurious addition of "Lokesh" by IPs. Skyerise ( talk) 13:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. RobertEves92 12:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 17:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant LTA disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 13:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent content removal by multiple IPs. Politanvm talk 15:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Edit warring. ZimZalaBim talk 15:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Many editors keep removing information which is (currently) relevant. If they have an issue they can bring it up on the discussion page, but this is getting out of hand. Coldstreamer20 ( talk) 15:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address adding random templates. - Kevo327 ( talk) 16:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from a sockmaster, I felt entitled to block one of the socks despite involvement after they started hurling slurs, but further page protection (and maybe removing some edit summaries) should be done by someone fully uninvolved. signed, Rosguill talk 18:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 19:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. About 40 disruptive edits in last week itself. Dhruv edits ( talk) 19:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing by IPs House Blaster talk 19:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated anon IP changes to place of birth, no WP:RS source Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extended Confirmed Protection. She recently died and people are putting in unneeded info or incorrect info. Bobherry Talk Edits 20:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: edit warring about a source by user LaHire07. Beshogur ( talk) 17:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses. Alphazelf ( talk) 20:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is some anti Armenian IP on the loose. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 20:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Main plot is a racist woman terrorizing a black couple, a few vandalism edits have already been made. Lallint⟫⟫⟫ Talk 19:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 19:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: Death not confirmed as of 12/31/21 19:36 UTC Miguel2586 ( talk) 19:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Not done People has a statement from her agent confirming, so other outlets should have it shortly. Katie talk 19:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the creation of this page is for a village. People will get to learn about our village. No one will get offended by true facts and information . Abhay18082001 ( talk) 08:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Fixed it. Also - : Not done if the subject is suitable for inclusion then a draft can be created through the articles for creation process where it can be evaluated before being published. Amortias ( T)( C) 18:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply