- 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced and non-encyclopedic comments on personal life style made by the same IP.
EdJF (
talk)
17:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
19:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
S0091 (
talk)
19:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: This page has been semi-protected before but it has failed to stop consistent editing of people adding the claim that it is "Russian-owned", which is not cited and there is no consensus for. This is consistently added by IP's and non-registered users without any discussion. Last semi-protection was initiated on 9 December 2019.
Helper201 (
talk)
21:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
22:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Subject to extensive socking for a long time now, semi is clearly not working here.
Gotitbro (
talk)
07:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There does seem to be an ongoing issue with autoconfirmed socks.
Chetsford (
talk)
07:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. --
LuK3
(Talk)
13:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Sarahj2107 (
talk)
19:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandal account indeffed.
Bishonen |
talk
15:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
03:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
El_C
03:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
11:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple disruptive edits by IPs who refuse to acknowledge the reasons for their edits being reverted.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
11:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Is not vandalism --
Suarez9348 (
talk)
11:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done, semi-protected. --
Suarez9348 (
talk)
11:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Due to "Persistent long-term vandalism by anonymous users over many years," page was protected on 22 Sep 2019 to require autoconfirmed or confirmed access. However, with the Senate now foremost in the news, this page is being vandalized by users with such access. Please raise level of protection.
NedFausa (
talk)
20:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There was only one offending user and that person has been blocked. Until there is longer term or more frequent problems, the current protection level should suffice.
Fuzheado |
Talk
01:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
-
Revision history shows that the content of
Flyboyrob2112's vandalism was exactly the same as
Fullmetal2887's, which the latter posted first. The only difference is that Flyboyrob2112 edit warred over these 3,976 bytes, whereas Fullmetal2887 did not. Yet administrator
El C
indefinitely blocked Flyboyrob2112 for disruptive editing, and did not block Fullmetal2887. I don't understand how Flyboyrob2112's edit warring is so much more disruptive than Fullmetal2887's original vandalism. Flyboyrob2112 legitimately earned a block. For the same offense, though, Fullmetal2887 is free to boast about publicly discrediting Wikipedia. Sure seems like a double standard.
NedFausa (
talk)
02:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Whereas to me, it sure seems like an assumption of bad faith on
NedFausa's part. For the record, I was unaware of the edit warring, or there being another user making the same edits. Or what those edit were. I blocked for
disruptive editing, as is clear from the block log, due to the continued usage of "go fuck yourself" in the edit summaries.
El_C
03:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
NedFausa: I've gone ahead and warned
Fullmetal2887. As with
El_C, I only saw the one user's disruptive content. Nevertheless, the fact that one other user was a problem does not warrant the total lockdown of an article which is a drastic measure we rarely take. The proper remedy would be to bring that particular user up for blocking, rather than fully protecting the article. -
Fuzheado |
Talk
08:16, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
08:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Perhaps I'm missing something but there seems to be lots of IP editing that is not reverted and seem productive. Therefore, until the vandalism is explained/illustrated better, I don't see the urgency of semi-protecting this.
Fuzheado |
Talk
08:24, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High frequency vandalism.
HaeB (
talk)
10:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
10:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
11:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi, let us try pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
DragoMynaa (
talk)
00:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC) --
DragoMynaa
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
El_C
03:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
07:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since this is the first time we are semi-protecting it, we usually don't go with indefinite right away. Try for 1 month first and come back if there are more issues.
Fuzheado |
Talk
08:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Regular anonymous vandalism calling this comedian unfunny, spiking over the past few days.
Lord Belbury (
talk)
08:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was previously long-term semi-protected for similar reasons, which justifies a 3 month semi-protection, if not more.
Fuzheado |
Talk
08:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and disruption. --
LuK3
(Talk)
14:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP repeatedly changing text in the article to a title that does not match the article's title, and changing other things, based on a poor source. If these changes are to be made, this needs discussion on the talk page and better sourcing.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
04:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of new editors and IPs changing numbers without providing sources.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
04:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
El_C
05:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
18:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
19:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple users adding in unsourced information (UK Independence Day), when, in reality, such a day does not exist.
Aswin8 (
talk)
19:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – repeated longterm genre warring.
RF23 (
talk)
21:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Long term Semi-protection: Almost all the IP edits have been immature vandalism, often in reference to his name. I reverted to 3 weeks ago and nothing of value was lost.
Gatemansgc (
TɅ̊LK)
22:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Is it trade day for soccer clubs? Seems there's a ton of vandalism going around articles, I can barely keep up with reverting vandalism.
Gatemansgc (
TɅ̊LK)
22:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:46, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing; addition of unsourced
WP:BLP content.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
02:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
02:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP editors adding information on subject's death today without any source except "see note on Facebook from her publisher". .
MB
02:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
14:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing; persistent removal of sourced content, IP hopping vandal.
73.186.215.222 (
talk)
03:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP users repeatedly alter or add information that is not sourced (i.e. adding middle name to a BLP). .
TJMSmith (
talk)
03:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Page is being targeted by IP socks of
The UPN Vandal.
The Grand Delusion(
Send a message)
14:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
22:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Increase of IP vandalism, esp. as this involves sport and tensions between India & Pakistan, with the latest edit referring to the latter a "terrorist nation".
Lugnuts
Fire Walk with Me
19:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
21:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing; some users and many IP addresses keep adding languages that aren't yet supported by Google Translate under the 'Supported languages' section and its 'History' sub-section since early September, even though I've reverted many of their edits, and even though I've added a hidden message under that section reminding people not to.
PK2 (
talk)
20:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restoring 1 year semi-protection that had been in place from 2018-2019. I'd advise also to warn that particular user about unsourced content use other measures.
Fuzheado |
Talk
01:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Both these templates should have the same protection level as both are exactly the same risk, not one template protected and one unprotected. I suggest semiprotection as the right protection level. Original protection was made by
Od Mishehu who is blocked. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
19:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Muboshgu, thanks! Could you also reduce the excessive protection of {{
Cfl full}} for consistency? ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
22:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Trialpears, sure can. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple attempts to use page for advertising of yoga offerings.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
19:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
19:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
05:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not seeing vandalism. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by 2 Extended Confirmed editors. .
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
14:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Near instant resuming of vandalism as soon as the protection expired today.
Katniss
May the odds be ever in your favor ♥
16:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations. —
Vaibhavafro
💬
17:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:12, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Ionmars10 (
talk)
18:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This article keeps being vandalized, and despite being protected multiple times it has not stop. I think the protection should be made permanent.
TheAwesome
Hwyh
21:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
El C. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism - After a commercial featuring the "death" of Mr. Peanut, this article received numerous vandalism from IP users. While this page was protected before, it recently expired, causing more vandalism to occur from IP users.
EEllis2002 (
talk)
16:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent removal of templates and edit war.
Kthxbay (
talk)
17:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
19:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High amount of vandalism from different IPs over the last few days.
Tdc42 (
talk)
20:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing by
User:PNGChimbu and
User:FactsvFiction (which may be a sockpuppet of PNGChimbu) who have been adding multiple paragraphs on negative events in the subject's life to paint his career as significantly negative.
Bookscale (
talk)
10:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
12:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The same person is using various IP's, starting with 45, all in the Ontario area of Canada to promote
WP:FRINGE theories and adding "See also" items which are not relevent. Two editor's have reverted these changes and warned IP, which are then reverted back with a different IP address.
David J Johnson (
talk)
12:12, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
13:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Now used by semiprotected {{
Cfc}} after the template was converted to use
Module:Cfd. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
13:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Numerous users/IPs trying to upload invalid images, and removing the current one. Per talk page apparently there is chatter on Instagram about updating the photo, but recent attempts have be out of policy.
ZimZalaBim
talk
16:05, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations according to logs. --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Eagles247.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite Pending changes protection: The Davido article has experience persistent vandalism since December 2019. It is currently a GA nomineee.
Versace1608
Wanna Talk?
16:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism.
S0091 (
talk)
16:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Migsmigss (
talk)
05:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
10:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Sockpuppet of Nate Speed struck again after semi-protection ended. .
Java
Hurricane
12:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
13:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations due to recent events. --
LuK3
(Talk)
14:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk)
15:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Nate Speed once again.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk)
05:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Lofty abyss.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
10:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Migsmigss (
talk)
05:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined, content dispute--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:54, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Lordtobi (
✉)
10:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
10:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Can we protect this page, to force the current edit war onto the Talk page for resolution?
ابو علي (Abu Ali) (
talk)
23:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Question: @
Abu ali: Do you mean full protection to prevent everyone from editing? Please very briefly explain what is going on because it's not the usual revert/revert/revert.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined This is also
at WP:ANI. Please post a new request with an explanation if action required.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Looking at the history, there is a quite large amount of vandalism on this page.
DemonDays64 (
talk)
04:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
04:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
05:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Sro23.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued addition of excessive episode summaries by IP,
WP:DE.
Magitroopa (
talk)
16:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Magitroopa: Sorry but the talk page has not yet been created. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (Non-administrator observation) @
Magitroopa: Episode summaries are fine as long as they are brief summaries of the plot usually around 200 words, are not directly copied from a
copyrighted source (i.e. Hulu episode summaries) and not a concern for a BLP violation.
MOS:TVEPISODELIST is a good resource for list of TV episodes in general.
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
01:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Kthxbay (
talk)
18:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Kthxbay: Why are the edits
vandalism? There is no explanation on article talk. The IP provided a reference which verifies the most significant part of their edit (I didn't check the rest). Please explain the issue on article talk and try to engage the IP there.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Interstellarity (
talk)
00:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Only a couple of recent bad edits and the most recent IP is blocked.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Please stop me edit warring, and the other guy. Not Guy of course. -
Roxy, the PROD. .
wooF 14:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC).
Roxy, the PROD. .
wooF 14:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn edit warrior blocked. -
Roxy, the PROD. .
wooF
19:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn by requestor
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Seeing some IPs/non-autoconfirmed additions of unsourced content regarding flight suspensions. I think PC protection would work well instead of semi in this case. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
04:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
03:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent flagging of page for "rapid deletion" by unconfirmed user. Sometimes calls itself "C Nuker", sometimes "B Nuker". Activity started 16:39, 1 February 2020, after page appeared on "Did you know?". Repeated deletion/reversion cycles underway. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kelseymh (
talk •
contribs)
23:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The users are blocked but to discourage their habit I protected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
00:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Seeking 2 weeks protection for repeat vandalism by multiple IP editors.
Tom (LT) (
talk)
01:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry –
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liborbital.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
21:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Dreamy Jazz. Redirect was given indefinite semi-protection please see log for reason. (Non-administrator comment)
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
01:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
S0091 (
talk)
21:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Is there any way we could bump up the protection on this page a little while? I feel like every time I log in, there are notifications that someone has vandalized it (usually with racist or sexist language).
Gen. Quon
(Talk)
21:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Gen. Quon: I protected but please check the most recent IP's edit:
diff. Their claim should be investigated.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced changes by anonymous users.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
21:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by anonymous users, related to the Corona virus.
Flaviut (
talk)
22:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of a single artist while failing to provide a reliable source.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
15:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
JalenFolf: I have no idea what that article is about. Please briefly explain why the IP's addition is not appropriate. That should be done using straightforward language on the article talk page. We're supposed to direct new users to article talk in the hope that they will learn the ropes. I'm protecting now, but if further protections are needed, the explanation and a link to the talk-page section in your reverting edit summary should be used first.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
17:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, but please review page's edit history, as it's been recently receiving edits from unconfirmed IPs; edits which do not come with reliable sources. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Migsmigss: You put an explanation on talk (but please link to
WP:RS) so ok. Next time please also link to the talk page section in the edit summary of your reverts.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Someone keeps changing his ethnicity. I think this can be temporary but it may need to be permanent.
Jorm (
talk)
19:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has not been protected since 2014 so I started with a short period.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism (see edit history) adding inappropriate sexual references to a children's book page.
mike•owen
discuss
20:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. On par with semi-protection for
President of the United States.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
20:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – BLP on American soccer player; keeps getting changed back and forth from "soccer" to "footballer".
MB
20:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
MB: I protected but in the future, please first explain the issue on article talk and try to engage the IP there.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from a varying IP address, always changing the list of songs to a different, made-up one, never with any comments or references to even try to justify it. This has been going on for over a year, though I only noticed recently. I'm not completely sure if semi-protection or 'pending changes' is more appropriate, so you can choose the latter if you want.
Exallonyx (
talk)
06:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Exallonyx: I can't understand the edits. Can you point out a couple of things in the most recent edit that are bogus and briefly explain how you know that? Can you do that for an old edit, say two months ago? Perhaps blocking
Special:Contributions/2001:44B8:5153:3E00::/64 would work, but before blocking I would need evidence that the edits are obviously bad. Otherwise semi-protection for a month might do.
Johnuniq (
talk)
06:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: Sure, the most noticeable thing is that, in actuality, the song "Young and Beautiful" was #7 and "Lanterns" was #22 - but the person editing it keeps switching those 2 songs around, as well as replacing some lower songs with ones that weren't actually in the top 100 (for example "Oh Sailor", "When I Was Young" and "Blood on the Leaves"). You can see the correct list on the radio station's official site
here, and also on this unofficial site that collates the annual lists
here. This person (assuming it's just one person, and not a bot) has made this same set of changes many times, for example in
November 2019,
July 2019 and
February 2019. It's pretty strange, I have no idea why someone would be so dedicated to this.
Exallonyx (
talk)
09:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Exallonyx: Strange. We have to proceed slowly and the page has never protected before, so I started with one month. That probably won't work. Please notify me if you see future problems and I'll take it further. It would be better if there were a short explanation politely setting out the facts on the article talk page.
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Suarez9348 (
talk)
11:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued disruptive IP editing.
Citobun (
talk)
13:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued persistent vandalism from numerous new/unconfirmed accounts.
IamNotU (
talk)
15:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP vandalism after second round of semi-protection ended.
Auberginandjuice (
talk)
18:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I've blocked the IP.
Bishonen |
talk
20:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
Dq209 (
talk)
18:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Favonian (
talk)
19:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP Vandalism.
Jorm (
talk)
21:41, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced and non-encyclopedic comments on personal life style now being made by multiple IPs, one of which has ten warnings on its talk page for disruptive editing
[1]
EdJF (
talk)
21:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP
vandalism – People are constantly trying to edit a 7th Flamengo title where it has been ruled by Brazilian authorities that the 1987 Brazilian championship title belongs to Sport Club do Recife, and to Sport Club do Recife only. Also request to rollback to version on 30 January 2020, 03:09h (don't have the rights to do this). Temporary semi-protection should go at least until start of new Campeonato Brasileiro season (around May 2020) or even better end of 2020 season (first weekend in december). thank you very much,
LH7605 (
talk)
16:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protection:
High-risk template – Now used by template protected
Template:Uncategorized. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
16:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
MusikBot II.
Favonian (
talk)
19:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Favonian, that's semi-protection. I believe it should be template protected since it's used in a template protected template and thus is just as high risk. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
19:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected. Indeed! I must expand my log processing buffer.
Favonian (
talk)
19:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Danski454 (
talk)
19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Widr.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – All of the
WP:DOY pages are semi protected to prevent chronic IP vandalism
.
Toddst1 (
talk)
15:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Pending changes appears to be working as intended.
El_C
16:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked.
Hell in a Bucket (
talk)
16:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Needs protection for at least a little bit: at list two IPs have been active in whitewashing, and one SPA.
Drmies (
talk)
16:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
17:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection.
Utkarsh Nayan Gupta (
talk)
14:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined See
here. No disruption so far.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: For unexplained reasons, people keep disrupting her infobox regarding her relationships, both former and current, despite the note that has been there for a long time telling them not to. It’s been happening for about 2 weeks at least. To a lesser extent it’s happening on her ex’s page.
⌚️ (
talk)
16:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
17:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from IP editors.
Tdc42 (
talk)
16:49, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
17:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Socks have resumed vandalism after expiry of previous protection.
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jessicavofficial.
Cabayi (
talk)
12:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last IP stopped after warning, and last disruptive edit was some days ago.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent High level of IP vandalism from the PR people.
The9Man
talk
13:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Always the same IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended temporary semi-protection: Same as
Suzuki Carry, persistent
sockpuppetry by a
sockpuppet of
Alex Neman, which has been previously blocked multiple times. The articles themselves have been protected for 1 week before.
182.30.204.161 (
talk)
15:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, both, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
16:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
11:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:25, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses plus at least one new user.
Hug
syrup
13:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. -
FitIndia
Talk
Commons
14:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
14:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry by a
sockpuppet of
Alex Neman, which has been previously blocked multiple times. The article itself has been protected for 2 weeks before.
182.30.204.161 (
talk)
15:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism from anonymous IPs
194.247.60.2 (
talk)
05:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Nothing recent. Stale.
El_C
05:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, semi-protection for at least two weeks would help.
KCVelaga (
talk)
08:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent POV editing from both sides; either whitewashing sourced content or BLP violations.
Bennv3771 (
talk)
11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism from anonymous IPs
194.247.60.2 (
talk)
05:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
05:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The history shows lots of reverts of unhelpful and poorly done edits.
194.247.60.2 (
talk)
05:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I think you mis-linked. Check your own link and redo.
El_C
05:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Lots of schoolcruft. Even though this hasn't been protected before, there is a looong history of namecruft vandalism here.
John from Idegon (
talk)
07:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 MONTHS, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
07:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Subject to extensive socking from dormant socks and IPs. See also {{
Urdu topics}} (currently under EP) for socking by the same master.
Gotitbro (
talk)
07:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
08:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. —
Mike Novikoff
08:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
08:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
06:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
JalenFolf: How do we know that the edits are by a sock? Can you contact an admin familiar with the case? Currently
History of cricket in Pakistan from 2011 is a redirect to
History of cricket in Pakistan from 2001 to 2010 which is a little odd. That means it's hard for an ignorant admin to take an administrative action.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- We're working on it. Störm opened an SPI case
here.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
21:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
El_C
07:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
05:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk)
05:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism by IP editors today due to the Super Bowl.
Tdc42 (
talk)
05:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
06:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on featured article.
ACQ322Acuity (
answer me)
23:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. Please see previous RFPPs and talk page. →
GS →
☎ →
01:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection Vandalism.
Zagalejo
^^^
02:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
03:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
02:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
04:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Administrator vandalism without review of history.
PhanChavez (
talk)
02:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done Semi-protection wouldn't do anything. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
02:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: I've reverted to the original redirect. This needs to be discussed on the article talk page per WP:BRD.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated disruption by adding unsourced claims.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
18:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Looks to be mainly one IP which we don't protect pages for. Level II warning issued. If problems persist after suitable warnings report to AIV or ANI.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Block evasion by
User:GoogleMeNowPlease.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
01:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – New movie with high traffic drawing a lot of edits including spoilers and test edits. .
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
02:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Automobile articles
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits by a
sockpuppet of
Alex Neman.
182.30.204.161 (
talk)
05:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edit filter trips.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
18:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry –
WIkipedia:Long-Term Abuse/Italian Anime Vandal.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
18:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Today is Groundhog Day, so the article would be Treanding. However, recently, unregistered users have been recently vandalising the article.
Can I Log In (
talk)
18:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
21:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. Mass attack, or one kid who has nothing to do but account hop until the Super Bowl starts.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
22:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping editor.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
17:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection. editing dispute in content. i will try not to edit until dispute is done.
Jungguk (
talk)
18:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: (Non-administrator observation) Page never existed.
Invalid
OS (
talk)
18:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: typo --
Deep
fried
okra
18:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I have posted to ANI, though it looks like the edit warring stopped 10 hours ago.--
Deep
fried
okra
19:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This Talk page for an impending GA has been created 4 times so far as a test page by inexperienced editors, so this needs a protection for at least temporary level until the review starts.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
19:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected indefinitely.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
QEDK,
Thank you for salting with only the appropriate level of salt required. This is especially important for indefinite salting. I have no idea why someone would want to repeatedly recreate a subpage of an existing talkpage of an article. Strange...
Doug Mehus
T·
C
19:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- All four were test pages which makes me more curious, some kind of link must persist somewhere. Strange indeed... --
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
{ [ ( jjj
1238 ) ] }
02:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing (South Korea vs Korea, China vs Mainland China etc.) by IP edits, popular theme.
Jklamo (
talk)
15:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This is a BLP violation magnet (e.g., people adding names).
Crossroads
-talk-
16:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Previous IP editor blocked for edit warring but now appears that they are socking. Semi protection for one week would be helpful to prevent further socking.
Enwebb (
talk)
18:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
El_C.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
SatDis (
talk)
11:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued addition of unsourced content/
information that is clearly incorrect.
Magitroopa (
talk)
12:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
1990'sguy (
talk)
14:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DoebLoggs (
talk)
10:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Article getting about half a million pageviews a day.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
10:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
12:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DB1729 (
talk)
11:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DB1729 (
talk)
11:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Migsmigss (
talk)
08:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. 1 IP today, before that: no edits at all for about 3 weeks.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs continuously adding a descriptive of him being "the ideal Aryan". This is a continuing problem in spite of a previous page protection.
Alivardi (
talk)
10:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Reduction in protection level: Pending changes protection to unprotected. Vandalism is only coming from 1 IP range. I have reported the IP range to AIV as NOTHERE.
GhostOfDanGurney (
talk)
01:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ymblanter: the protecting admin.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over a : against Wikipedia's style for subtitles by a COI editor. I'm involved, but protection will allow for actual discussion and resolution.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
22:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- That's already been tried.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
23:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Headbomb,
Question: How long were you seeking full protection for? Full protection is rare and, when it is, it's often used for a few days to up to a week (two tops) to let the talk page discussion play out. See examples at
Spider-Man: Far From Home and
Sharyl Attkisson for length of time.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
02:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- A few days probably is all that's needed. Or maybe the worst is over? Hard to say.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
06:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Headbomb, Ah, I see this is a redirect, and the dispute is over the parenthetical qualifier used. Seems like a case for temporary move protection, not full protection.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
15:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The issue isn't the location of the page, it's the styling of the subtitle in the article (and references).
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
15:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of NPOV violations.
NedFausa (
talk)
05:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support: I second this request. IP users continue to add false and misleading information that requires constant reverts.
Rainclaw7 (
talk)
05:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support Came here to propose this. IPs are either spamming about Yang or about the vote being rigged against Sanders (even though he's winning?)
Nixinova
T
C
05:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support: Came across the page spammed with dumb Bernie Bros vandals in the opening text. constant warring on the page. --
Chungy (
talk)
05:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support: Came across anonymous users with possible vandalism tag attached, who keeps edit warring, and keeps adding false information. -
Centrist1 (
talk)
06:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
One day of semi applied by yours truly.
Bearcat (
talk)
06:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks.
Nixinova
T
C
06:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you. -
Centrist1 (
talk)
06:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks.
Rainclaw7 (
talk)
06:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This page is undergoing much vandalism by various users in the last 2 days. -- φ
OnePt618
Talk φ
07:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced content/vandalism from IPs. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
02:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism.
K=caklin (
talk)
04:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Severe vandalism from major IP hopper vandal (possibly an LTA or troll).
Java
Hurricane
06:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected --
Deep
fried
okra
06:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP consistently changing age at death despite RS saying he was 50.
Enwebb (
talk)
00:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
El_C
01:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An editor has, incorrectly, started an XfD for the above-captioned page at
MfD because another extendedconfirmed editor is edit warring and reverting the redirect to an earlier state in which it was not a redirect. Nevertheless, as
Robert McClenon and I pointed out at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Help:IPA/Saidi Arabic,
RfD is, absolutely and completely, the proper venue. So, can an administrator kindly procedurally close the MfD, initiate an RfD, and then either page protect and/or block the extendedconfirmed edit warring editor until the conclusion of the XfD? Thanks.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The editor in question, Sefarat90, is
autoconfirmed, so temporary
extendedconfirmed protection should be sufficient, and would allow
Justlettersandnumbers to re-nominate, correctly, at
RfD. Thanks. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Sefarat90
partially blocked from the page for one week. Therefore, there is no need for protection at this time. I also closed the MfD (procedural close). An
RfD nomination may now proceed.
El_C
01:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El C, Nice...I didn't know you can apply page-specific blocks. That's very helpful, and a good approach. How common are page-specific blocks? I suppose in many cases, they don't work because the editor is vandalizing multiple pages, but when it's limited to a single page or two, I think it's a wonderful tool.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
02:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yeah, I'm getting increasing use of it since it has been made available recently. Indeed, sometimes it works, sometimes
it doesn't. But it is nice to have in the toolset, in any case.
El_C
02:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
U.S. politics
Semi-protection - LTA IPs attacking both pages. --
LuK3
(Talk)
02:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
MelanieN.
Rex Tillerson was given indefinite semi protection. (Non-administrator comment)
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
05:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston.
Marco Rubio was semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Non-administrator comment)
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
05:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Persistent vandalism - Fans of the metal band Bad Wolves persist in editing entire chapters of their cover of "Zombie" with the performances in the charts of this band, and an entire paragraph making praise for their cover (advertisement). This page should be indefinitely protected without the Bad Wolves' cover in it. A protest song should have its own page and stay alone. (note: The Cranberries don't like the Bad Wolves' cover. Sources: ABC News Radio and abcnewsradioonline.com, 24 January, 2020). Thank you.
Oroborvs (
talk)
19:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: This page has seen persistent years-long vandalism by newly registered or IP users, and was semi-protected for much of 2019. User(s) appear to be watching this page over a very long timespan to systematically delete any
WP:RS that mentions the existence of transgender identities. Often these are extremely simple summaries of strong perennial sources, totally blanked without explanation. The only attempts to find a
WP:CONSENSUS that were ever made at
Talk:Stone butch were made by frustrated content contributors who wanted to know why their reliable sources were getting persistently blanked. Honestly I strongly recommend keeping this page on lock down for a very long time -- the
page history shows that this has been a site of edit warring for at least 6 years! It does however look like semi-protection works against this particular instance of vandalism, so I don't think anything stronger is needed at this time. -
Astrophobe (
talk)
20:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Added page links line, which I forgot earlier -
Astrophobe (
talk)
21:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. No IP edits since October 2019. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: I just stumbled over this and the last month or so is almost pure slow edit war. This does not look pretty, to say the least.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
22:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Well over half of recent edits are either vandalism, non-consensus edits, or reverts of those edits. The parent page,
Periodic table, is semi-protected, so it seems reasonable to extend that protection to this template. I know that we don't usually use semi-protection on templates, but I don't think template protection is warranted here. It's more like protecting an article, since this is essentially article content. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
23:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – It's obvious that the vandalism and disruptive editing didn't cease after the previous protection amidst the Kobe tragedy.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
01:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kobe's death is still recent. Too recent to say we need indefinite protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
01:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This page seems to be the prime target for adding cricket-related spam links.
Dee
03
19:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Seems it was only a few edits, and they were a week ago. Monitor the page and resubmit a request if it resumes. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated
addition of claim that Mary shook a fruit branch as she gave birth. The cited source does not appear to support the claim. The citation does not provide a page number, which makes verifying the claim impractical. Claim also added
February 1 and
30 December but the page to search page histories is broken so I can't readily find all the additions.
Jc3s5h (
talk)
22:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
23:25, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – multiple IPs.
Neils51 (
talk)
23:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement –
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions.
nableezy -
18:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 18:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
GAB
gab
19:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Hello, I feel the need to object to this. I haven't edited Wikipedia on my own account for seven years, since once I'm logged in, I get invested. I do anonymously fix vandalism, formatting errors, and obvious POV-pushing anonymously when I see them. In this case, I noticed that
User:Nableezy, who has been warned multiple times with regards to Israel-Palestine-related comments, was patrolling this page to ensure that his POV-pushing, factually inaccurate edits remained in. I decided it would be pointless to do anything about it myself, but pointed it out to a pro-Israel acquaintance, who decided to revert the edits. I told him that it would be reverted within 24 hours (slightly off, but not by much) since Nableezy has reverted several other anonymous users who previously fixed the same issue, but I did not anticipate that page protection would be requested by the rule-violating editor, much less that they would be granted.
- I don't personally care much about the I/P conflict, and it's people like Nableezy—long-term editors who exist mainly to promote an agenda and have found ways to abuse Wikipedia's rules and policies in pursuit of said agenda—who are the reason I stopped regularly editing Wikipedia in the first place. (They show up in the weirdest places, never face consequences, while they affected a small minority of pages I edited, the mental energy I spent dealing with them was too much.) I don't really want to get involved with a user like this now, but I'm always upset to see pages protected unnecessarily. As such, I feel compelled to suggest that helping a long-time user with a history of disruptive editing protect his POV-pushing, factually inaccurate edits is emphatically not what page protection is for. The problem here is very clearly Nableezy and not the anonymous users who keep reverting him. --
2605:A601:AAEA:7200:3441:423D:F523:123B (
talk)
06:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- But the problem you bring up can't be solved via this page here. Pages which fall in the scope of ARBPIA are somewhat sensible, and prone to be protected at the slightest whiff of disruption. Try discussing with Nableezy and the protecting admin first, and for more grievances there is
WP:ANI.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks, I started to do that, and in the process of gathering evidence realized that there's a rule that says IP's and new accounts can't edit any article connected to the I/P conflict.
User:Nableezy has referred to this rule obliquely, but it's clearly not one which anyone who is not an active user actively involved in I/P articles is going to know. The protection is all I cared about, and apparently it's policy, with this sort of thing being the entirely predictable result. --
2605:A601:AAEA:7200:4463:B5A2:D219:C989 (
talk)
08:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – SPA constantly adding poorly sourced and promotional material and reverting edits.
GSS
💬
17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The user
reverted again after the warning was issued so, can someone please revert back and protect? Thank you.
GSS
💬
18:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Favonian (
talk)
18:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement.
Will120 (
talk)
18:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
18:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement.
Will120 (
talk)
18:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
18:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – almost all recent edits have been anon vandalism/reverts, previous protections.
Will120 (
talk)
18:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.. Based on the long history of disruption, PCP is likely to be ineffective, merely shifting the cleanup workload to reviewers. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
19:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Months-long frequent vandalism. ---
C&
C (
Coffeeandcrumbs)
19:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. It just came off a full year of semi-protection. No reason to think it won't happen again if another auto-expire protection is applied, so I made it indefinite. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
19:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – String of spammers.
David Biddulph (
talk)
19:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
David Biddulph: That article has a strange protection history, where it's protected and the protection is removed, in one case due to a
discussion on ANI. It seems the article has a history of sporadic COI editors coming in. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
19:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – frequent target of school-based vandalism over the years with many protections, anon edits almost always unconstructive.
Will120 (
talk)
18:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
18:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – long history of school based vandalism & a long protection log, recently came off semiprotection.
Will120 (
talk)
18:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
18:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations.
Binksternet (
talk)
19:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Binksternet: This article had never been protected before, and I'm hesitant to jump right into ECP unless there's a lot of recent evidence saying it's needed. In this case, it appears the recent disruption was coming from anonymous IP addresses. If you see something to indicate the protection level should be elevated, let me know. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
19:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full-protection; edit-war between IP and established editors over goal count sourcing. IP is a hopper. —
A little blue Bori
v^_^v
Onward to 2020
03:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. The user was already blocked on a different IP so their edits are block evasion. I've blocked their current range for 2 weeks. I've declined to protect the page, although there are a series of recent edits from unrelated IPs which are vandalism. I trust you can take care of cleaning up the page at this point, but do let me know if the user comes back again.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
14:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Binksternet (
talk)
04:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. The IPs you're edit-warring with are making good points,
Binksternet, which you're ignoring. Nobody has edited this article's talk page in nearly three years. I suggest you try it.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
14:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection Banned sock-puppet
BecomeFree has advertised the article on
Reddit, so massive traffic from carnivore pseudoscience promoters. Already several IPs and an account have edited the article trying to remove fad diet from the lead. This is also a potential meat-puppet/sock-puppet issue.
Psychologist Guy (
talk)
16:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
17:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent blp issue & vandal.
Dede2008 (
talk)
17:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Deep
fried
okra
17:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Let me know if that doesn't fix it/ --
Deep
fried
okra
17:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
Colonestarrice (
talk)
11:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 1 disruptive edit today, before that no edits at all for days.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP:185.125.226.42 is continually adding to intro - information of a non-notable person and quoting a "magazine" not seen locally. These "edits" appear to be a joke/vandalism. No reliable sources quoted.
David J Johnson (
talk)
12:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. It's always the same IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I have warned them twice!
David J Johnson (
talk)
12:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yep. If they continue to vandalize after 4th warning, they may be blocked.--
Deep
fried
okra
12:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
Deep
fried
okra
12:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – repeated vandalism and again subject to vandalism as soon as it's unprotected.
Coderzombie (
talk)
13:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Virtuaso (
talk)
12:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
12:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
13:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I realize the tool doesn't allow much flexibility when filing a report, but these edits were not vandalism. They are, however, adding information based on unreliable sources, and it's happening a lot, so the page is protected. If it continues after a week then
pending changes may work better.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP edit warring and removing references.
Gogolwold (
talk)
13:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Gogolwold and
1.128.106.75: take your content dispute to the talk page now. If you continue edit warring after protection expires I will block you instead.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Today is the Kashmir solidarity day and vandalism is happening. IP is doing edit war. .
Harshil
want to talk?
04:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The page must be protected from any further edits even by registered editors because Harshil169 is the one vandalizing the article by blanket removal of large chunks of text without assigning a reason or on frivolous grounds of POV without specifying where the problems lies. He isn't even using the talkpage having already made 2 reverts himself.
39.50.212.206 (
talk)
05:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
09:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
AntiCedros (
talk)
11:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Requesting page protection on the subject for at least a week pending when the controversy section can be well written with facts and proper reliable sources, there's continuous revert and addition of contents to it by new users.
Lapablo (
talk)
10:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: (Non-administrator observation) It seems there's a content dispute going on. I'd recommend any admins processing this request to tread carefully.
Invalid
OS (
talk)
15:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Also somewhat stale.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit-warring by editor engaging in IP-hopping. Also other pages (
Mannheim Centre for European Social Research) are affected by the same pattern of repeated disruptive editing.
Rsk6400 (
talk)
07:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Reduction in protection level: Semi-protected to unprotected. The sock
IP was blocked and seems no more active. Protecting a whole page for a single person is no more necessary. The other edits going on the page is updating tables (non-disputable content) as the show is currently running. Most of the challengeable content are sourced.
2409:4073:201B:EFA3:A0A2:879D:E7B6:72BA (
talk)
09:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ponyo: the protecting admin.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The LTA sock in this case has myriad dynamic ranges at their exposure and has been active on these particular articles for years.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
16:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Could you change it to pending changes, I believe it's not too much to ask for.
2409:4073:49C:EBB2:8CAF:3ACC:D350:A230 (
talk)
16:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Pending changes does not work on articles that have a high editing rate from unconfirmed accounts. Is there a reason you can't just create an account to edit articles you're interested in that are under semi-protection?--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An IP 73.94.200.XXX has persisted with an edit for a few weeks now that slips in sneaky vandalism among a much greater change (much of which seems to be legitimate). One example would be the addition of fake cast members in the infobox.
Betty Logan (
talk)
01:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP accounts.
Aria1561 (
talk)
20:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. 2606:6000:6102:F500:0:0:0:0/64 rangeblocked x 2 weeks.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Please apply for remainder of PP period.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
00:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Not enough disruptive editing to justify the increase in the current protection level.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. This
Yeet (disambiguation) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) should properly occupy
Yeet (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views), which is a creation-protected location. The same vandalism that afflicted
Yeet also applies to this page, because of the
wikt:yeet usage on the internet. Thus the disambiguation pagename and the base pagename locations need edit protection, and the disambiguation page should occupy the base location.
67.70.33.184 (
talk)
05:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Not the venue for a page move discussion, but I disagree anyway. --
Deep
fried
okra
06:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – recent IP edits have been consistently reverted despite PC protection, numerous previous semiprotections.
Will120 (
talk)
06:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
07:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: PC remains --
Deep
fried
okra
07:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP on BLP page.
Ghmyrtle (
talk)
19:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Objection to above. Request that instead Gymyrtle's powers are called into question instead. Please review this editor's impartiality and abuse of powers which has been ongoing for some time for many Brexit related articles.
46.208.194.84 (
talk)
20:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism; block evasion.
Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: The consensus is that as a performer who has released music to the Christian marketplace, has charted on Christian Billboard charts, has received awards from the Christian music industry, and reviewers call him a "Christian rapper". The subject, as with many who are trying to break into mainstream media, claim that he is a Christian who raps, not performer of "Christian rap", and so his fans are regularly and dutifully changing the lede.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
02:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Subject appears to have a small, but loyal fanbase who like to come to the article to pay homage to the minor performer who died prematurely. There is little else that can be added to the subject's article now that he's been dead nearly three years. Protected requests can be added to the talk page and the protection can be changed if new content suddenly becomes available, etc. At the very least, protect until the anniversary of his death has passed (minimum of three weeks).
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
02:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent ip / new editor vandalism.
Spike 'em (
talk)
21:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of NPOV violations at BLP of public official.
NedFausa (
talk)
21:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent incorrect change made by dynamic IP hopper.
FDW777 (
talk)
21:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism; mass attack via block evasion.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
22:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This article has for years been the subject of frequent to sporadic vandalism. It is a time-sink. Please protect it to save volunteer time for more constructive work. ---
C&
C (
Coffeeandcrumbs)
22:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Slow-moving POV fighting by IPs (mostly regarding Trump's impeachment), recommend protection for a few days.
creffett (
talk)
00:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- And also please enforce
WP:ARBDS. --
IanDBeacon (
talk)
01:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
IanDBeacon,
Thank you for asking for a very short term protection, and the lowest level of protection. I support that, but I'm surprised we have articles (stub-class, at that) on every state of the union address. Doesn't seem encyclopedic to me.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (also, since this is happening this evening and is going to be the usual amount of AP2 controversial, I figure we might as well get ahead of the edit warring)
creffett (
talk)
01:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Also, we now have two Presidential Medal of Honor articles being requested for protection. Could we also have
WP:ARBDS enforced on those as well? --
IanDBeacon (
talk)
03:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High level of vandalism related to recent event. Vandalism resumed after recent protection expired.
Esiymbro (
talk)
03:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
03:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Article is currently the target of an IP-hopping POV pusher. –
Skywatcher68 (
talk)
16:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism going on, since the subject is hot topic in India. Need protection for at least one month till trial starts which will be in March.
Dey subrata (
talk)
17:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Disruptive edit by dynamic IP.
McSly (
talk)
20:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
MilborneOne.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of NPOV violations.
NedFausa (
talk)
03:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism mainly by IP's
Tdts5 (
talk)
03:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – editor using multiple IP addresses to edit war content into the article against objections of multiple editors.
Rusf10 (
talk)
16:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
21:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Red Phoenix
talk
21:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
22:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
ARBPIA, II
Done.
El_C
22:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Favonian (
talk)
18:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Page daily targeted by POV-pushing IP hopper, keeps ignoring multiple invitations to join the talk page.
Khruner (
talk)
17:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
20:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of Vandalism .
The4lines (
talk)
17:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
20:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Consistent IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism, presumably by the school's own students.
Griceylipper (
talk)
12:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
14:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection Same nonsensical vandalism from IP-hoppers resumed after previous protection ended.
PohranicniStraze (
talk)
13:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
14:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I’m getting tired of being griefed and trolled by IP addresses for no god damn reason. I’m going to be away from Wikipedia for several weeks beginning tomorrow and I won’t have time to be patrolling my own damn talk page on the chance some anonymous asshole is going to pretend to block me again. .
GSK (
talk •
edits)
14:14, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – User talk pages
are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. Three total vandalism edits consisting of an IP adding a {{
blocked}}
template do not reach this threshold. Also, the IP is now blocked anyway.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
14:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – people adding unofficial trade to page despite semiprotection.
Will120 (
talk)
18:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – people adding unconfirmed trade despite semi protection.
Will120 (
talk)
18:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – people adding unconfirmed trade despite semiprotection.
Will120 (
talk)
18:07, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP-hopping vandal (started on other longevity-related articles).
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
08:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
DerbyCountyinNZ: are you sure you linked the right page? I see exactly no IP edits here.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It's actually happening on the Talk page. My understanding is it can't be protected separately from the main page.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
10:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It can be separately protected; I have changed the request accordingly.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Talk-pages have a higher threshold for protection anyway, and the disruption here doesn't rise to the level needing protection. I have watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – almost all recent anon edits have been unconstructive/reverted.
Will120 (
talk)
06:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:43, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of
WP:SPA who are pushing a POV and fringe views.
Jingiby (
talk)
06:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Drunkguyash (
talk)
10:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
03:10, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
04:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection Heavy IP vandalism from multiple IPs.
PohranicniStraze (
talk)
06:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: protection no longer needed due to his trade to hawks becoming official (unofficial announcement led to protection), clint capela was also in this trade & is on ecp so cannot add unprotection/downgrade request.
Will120 (
talk)
04:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – The page is only semiprotected and this does not prevent you from editing the article. Regarding Capela, why not post your evidence at
Talk:Clint Capela and open an edit request.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Binksternet (
talk)
02:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
05:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Nithin.danday!
talk
02:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
03:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
02:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
06:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring –
Hijiri88 tried to "merge" (but not merge, just clean the screen and redirect) this article under no consensus.
5LZ
05:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
06:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
05:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
06:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
05:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
06:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Will120 (
talk)
18:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
05:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Potential vandalism and BLP violations by dynamic IP hopper.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
23:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
05:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Binksternet (
talk)
00:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
05:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
02:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bagumba.
MelanieN (
talk)
05:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Previously temporarily semi-protected, but vandalism continued constantly after its removal. There hasn't been a single week where this article wasn't vandalized.
20DKB03 (
talk)
03:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – Indef.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ip vandalism.
The4lines (
talk)
04:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: the last AfD was 2 years back. I have evaluated that this passes the notability criteria. A new AfD will be needed, if someone disagrees. kindly unprotect the talk so that we can discuss article improvement, instead of doing it on my talk page. fyi,
User:Black Kite.
DBig
Xrayᗙ
17:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected by Jo Jo--
DBig
Xrayᗙ
18:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of reported trade.
Will120 (
talk)
03:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
03:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of reported trade.
Will120 (
talk)
03:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
03:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
03:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
El_C
03:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
PackMecEng (
talk)
04:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – few constructive anon edits, infrequent target of school based vandalism.
Will120 (
talk)
18:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
1990'sguy (
talk)
21:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – High level of speculation based editing by IP's and non-confirmed registered editors.
T
v
x1
22:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recently deceased. Target of IP vandalism.
Doc Strange
Mailbox
Logbook
23:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ad Orientem.
El_C
03:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism; article attracts only trolls, so consider permanent semi-protection.
MaxBrowne2 (
talk)
02:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:14, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – vandalism due to his franchise making major transfer viewed unpopularly by fans.
Will120 (
talk)
18:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – many anon edits are unconstructive, as highest paid pitcher in biggest market in mlb, but not enough activity for semiprotection.
Will120 (
talk)
18:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations.
Will120 (
talk)
18:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
01:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
01:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
02:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
02:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
02:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
02:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Emk9 (
talk)
02:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP persistently adding "Qayyum Ansari" hoax to cast / awards section.
Ravensfire (
talk)
15:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism following a viral tweet about the article.
DarkGlow (
talk)
15:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of the label "neofascist"
by anonymous IP instead of discussing it on the talkpage, despite
previous reverts from other contributors. And probably a block evasion from
others IP blocked
1 month.
Martopa (
talk)
16:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent IP promotion.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
17:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent, persistent vandalism from anonymous IPs.
Qono (
talk)
15:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent, persistent vandalism from anonymous IPs.
Qono (
talk)
15:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Brojam (
talk)
15:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
JzG.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent harassment of editors by another user.
Puzzledvegetable
Is it teatime already?
18:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
18:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-3).
23:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This spammer is relentless.
El_C
00:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Though it's been backlogged for a week, see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drewpalazzolo. Same rambling
WP:OR from a variety of IP addresses about bullies and thugs and edits on the same other articles where their logged-in edits led the account to be blocked indefinitely.
Largoplazo (
talk)
01:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
01:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: I received a complaint via my talk page that this page is involved in a public dispute on Twitter. Apparently, someone is editing the page and then posting screenshots on Twitter to make a point. Wikipedia should not be used in this way, so I am asking for temporary protection on this page to dissuade the offenders. See link:
https://twitter.com/KnightOfNI5/status/1225640310161543168?s=20. -- φ
OnePt618
Talk φ
06:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
19:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. -
Mr
X 🖋
22:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
22:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism. Please check view history, also people keep removing and adding content. Please semi-protect to prevent further vandalism and violation of living people biographies policy. Protection for 2-3 years should prevent further vandalism, but the timing of semi-protection is up to administrator of course :)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever and the protection log is longer than my arm. Enough.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs and new users making unsourced edits. Also, Persistent Vandalism. Please check view history. Poorly sourced content and vandalism. Please Semi-protect.
Semi-protected indefinitely. As per above. Long term disruptive editing despite multiple protections. Enough.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
The Banner
talk
18:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Please give this List some type of permanent protection - it attracts an ongoing persistent drumbeat of all sorts of ohsofun/ohsoclever (NOT) vandalism. Just look at the recent editing history - vandalism/reverts. Vandalism again. Revert again. [a day or two goes by] Yay, more vandalism! Revert. [and so on and so on].
Shearonink (
talk)
19:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has never been previously protected, let us start with two weeks.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Really? Ok, yeah I guess so. Cripes, I'm surprised...it's a persistent target for vandals. Thanks for the semi-protection. Hopefully that will get us through the worst of the US Presidents Day holiday weekend/homework assignments/etc.
Shearonink (
talk)
20:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism; should have been locked long ago.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
21:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
Done by
Widr; (
non-admin closure) --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
21:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP repeatedly downplaying "husband" to "partner" since the start of the year.
Lord Belbury (
talk)
09:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi-protection--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Setting up protection, before adding the Infobox by September 2021.
Ni3Xposite (
talk)
10:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Incomprehensible request.
Favonian (
talk)
17:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotect: Ten years ago, this article was protected as a result of being repeatedly recreated as an attack page of a BLP. Protecting admin is now inactive. A different Chad Bryant is a notable historian (author of
Prague in Black). There should be at the very least a redirect to his book and ideally unprotection so that an article can be written about him.
b
uidh
e
03:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Shirik editted only 4 days ago.
Zero
talk
04:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (Non-administrator comment) @
Buidhe: If you provide a draft of a well written article that could go here, then protection can be lifted.
Invalid
OS (
talk)
13:05, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- With a quick look at your userpage, it seems that you're definitely capable of making a well-written article that can go here.
Invalid
OS (
talk)
13:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Right now it should be a redirect, because Bryant is mostly known as the author of the book and does not meet NPROF otherwise. But he is working on another book which will probably get attention and at that point it will make sense to create an article. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
Shirik has not made an edit since February 2019.
b
uidh
e
15:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done The protecting admin has indeed been off wiki for over a year. I unprotected the space and made the redirect. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
19:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs and new users making unsourced edits.
Zanhe (
talk)
04:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk)
04:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Cyphoidbomb.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
The Banner
talk
18:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
19:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined, apparently the reason for disruption is gone, and the pending changes protection is still there. Apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed trade.
Will120 (
talk)
19:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined, apparently the reason for disruption is gonerotection is still there. Apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – autoconfirmed users adding unconfirmed trade to article.
Will120 (
talk)
19:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined, now confirmed. Apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by redlinked users.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk)
04:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:50, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant re-insertion of unsourced rumours regarding the show's future. Edits coming from multiple IPv6, but most likely the same editor given octet similarity.
Chaheel Riens (
talk)
11:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – Subject of article is in the news for resignation in combination with communicating with a 16 year old boy. Many edit summaries / attempts to insert claims use loaded terminology.
Koncorde (
talk)
14:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Persistent edits by SPA appear to have begun, in addition to IP edits, just as an FYI.
Koncorde (
talk)
15:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is currently under semi-protection; there is some vandalism by autoconfirmed editors but I'm not seeing enough to require extended confirmed protection in my opinion. Any admin feel free to overrule me if it continues or gets worse.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
ARBPIA
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement –
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions.
nableezy -
17:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC) 17:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. @
Nableezy: Please combine AE protection requests into one header, makes it easier to signify when they are protected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – Famous UK figure who has come out as gay this morning - constant whack-a-mole with IPs adding crude BLP breaking statement - see page history.
Cameron Scott (
talk)
10:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
10:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Multiple IP's doing birth date changes, and there may be an edit war with several IP's. Since January. .
TFFfan (
talk)
13:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – LTA; see edit history for details.
Blake Gripling (
talk)
01:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
02:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Already on pending changes, but ip troll hasn't quit.
Crboyer (
talk)
21:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Full-protection:
Next verse, same as the first. Again, I'm unwilling to test if this is
unambiguously BLP-related. —
A little blue Bori
v^_^v
Onward to 2020
21:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. If it needs full protection, a clearer case would need to be explained.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
MikeTheEditor104 (
talk)
22:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
MikeTheEditor104 (
talk)
22:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced genres by anonymous users despite hidden note.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
23:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
23:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semiprotection or pending changes: persistent vandalisms, albeit infrequent, from variable IPs - seems to be especially a vandal target in recent months.
Dl2000 (
talk)
23:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The page is currently suffering a series of vandal edits.
Geoff |
Who, me?
17:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
01:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
01:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
01:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
01:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – LTA; see edit history for details.
Blake Gripling (
talk)
01:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
02:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent removal of sourced content by one IP and two 'new' users
DVdm (
talk)
15:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ad Orientem.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to
WP:BLP.
NedFausa (
talk)
15:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. I don't think there is enough disruption for semi-protection. . --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Shhhhwwww!! (
talk)
11:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Too many controversial edits (discussed on talk page).
SatDis (
talk)
11:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term budget vandals and ones who remove sourced info.
Krimuk2.0 (
talk)
14:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Constant disruption by random IPs / fresh accounts, for the love of god just put a long protection on it. This article never knows peace, just look at its history throughout the years.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
15:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Lordtobi (
✉)
10:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent undiscussed removal of well-sourced, pertinent negative information by one or more unregistered or new editors.
ElKevbo (
talk)
14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
14:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IPs and a registered editor (update: there's two now) who has not edited any other page insist on unsourced spelling changes. They also break files/templates to assert it is part of the cultural heritage of
Myanmar, which absolutely no one disputes, and is already stated several times without disrupting anything. I've asked for refs re spelling changes, and been ignored.
- Sumanuil (
talk)
03:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
18:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. -
FitIndia
Talk
Commons
11:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
19:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple IPs. --
LuK3
(Talk)
14:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 2 weeks by
User:Ohnoitsjamie.
EdJohnston (
talk)
19:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP unsourced edits prematurely indicating the band's demise. .
Geoff |
Who, me?
17:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
18:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Elizium23 (
talk)
02:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article has been subject to persistent vandalism by several IPs making unsourced edits. Has been extended-protected previously. .
Za-ari-masen (
talk)
13:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: This BLP has been subjected to a steady stream of vandalism over past two days.
NedFausa (
talk)
17:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
17:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Increased indefinite semi-protection.
Ni3Xposite (
talk)
11:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ni3Xposite: - do you mean the actual page "Barron Trump" (currently a redirect) or the "Family of Donald Trump" page? In either case, what warrants indef SP?
Nosebagbear (
talk)
11:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose indefinite semi-protection as they often get forgotten about. I would, however, support semi-protection for up to 12-24 months. It can easily be, and proactively, if necessary, extended.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
21:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
MelanieN.
Fuzheado |
Talk
22:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism for prolonged period of time. .
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
01:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I believe this is currently the most appropriate protection--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Look at the history. ---
C&
C (
Coffeeandcrumbs)
01:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Risker.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Consistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content from unregistered users over the course of several months. –
Lord Bolingbroke (
talk)
04:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 3 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Also, no good reason for IPs and new accounts to mess with this project-space redirect.
Crossroads
-talk-
05:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Fuzheado |
Talk
07:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article is a target for a constant stream of
POV-pushing by SPA accounts and IPs.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk)
08:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
08:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: in all seriousness, when the protection ended the vandalism and disruption from IPs has returned. I don’t know why, but for some reason her personal life attracts a lot of fodder on her article.
⌚️ (
talk)
00:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – Indef. Rumors of romantic attachments being added and subtracted by different IPs.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: For second straight day, this BLP is being subjected to steady IP vandalism.
NedFausa (
talk)
02:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 3 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Elizium23 (
talk)
04:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
MikeTheEditor104 (
talk)
16:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: A persistent pattern of IP users removing large amounts of information from this article in an attempt to disrupt editing or censor the content. This follows similar protections on Jackson-related articles. --
Hazhk (
talk)
17:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Need to nominate for
RfD. Can't request to
Cobaltbluetony as protecting admin because they appear to no longer be an admin and haven't edited since 2015. Thanks.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
20:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done –
Muboshgu (
talk)
03:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Muboshgu,
Thank you.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
03:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Similar to
Eric Dalby request, this was indefinitely protected at sysop level by former admin
Cobaltbluetony, who hasn't edited since 2015. Need to tag for
RfD.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
20:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done –
Muboshgu (
talk)
03:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Muboshgu,
Thank you.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
03:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism. Probably a family member of the person is adding unreferenced info in the article. Even via google search I found nothing of his/her claim.
S. M. Nazmus Shakib (
talk)
09:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued from
INTV (Baru).
Jalen Folf
(talk)
15:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Today's google doodle, persistent vandalism by new and ip users.
Hemiauchenia (
talk)
16:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pretty self-explanatory. Not long after the previous protection expired, the unsourced nonsense about Lisa Riley returning to You've Been Framed! returned in full force.
You've Been Framed! has been protected again; I think this should be as well.
(Incidentally, I'm going to look REALLY stupid if it actually turns out to be true...).
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
16:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. 2A02:C7F:202D:DE00:0:0:0:0/64 blocked x 1 month.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Often overwritten by confused new editors.
John of Reading (
talk)
20:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Ad Orientem, any way we could call for long-term (1-2 years) of semi-protection, and, in tandem with that, indefinite pending changes protection?
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Dmehus: I generally operate on the belief that in most cases if you need to protect a page for longer than a year, indefinite is the way to go. That said, I'm open minded if you have a rational for this. Perhaps indefinite PC would be a better starting point? -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Ad Orientem, oh my only concern is that, typically, the original protecting admin has to be consulted to request unprotection. In your case, I don't see you hanging up your mop any time soon so it's probably fine. My concern otherwise is that sometimes (see my unprotection requests), the admins are desysopped due to inactivity, and it ties up unprotection requests. Also, sometimes, indefinite protection get forgotten about. But, you're a very active admin who isn't expected to retire...plus, it's not full protection either, so no strong concerns against indefinite protection.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unref, contra-ref and erroneous changes by random IPs, particularly to film budget and gross figures.
Dl2000 (
talk)
23:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Nikah mut'ah
Long-term semi-protection or temporary full protection. Persistent socking, edit warring, and other problematic editing. See
here for additional evidence.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
01:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – Indef, since indefinite Pending Changes was not sufficient. Report again if you see a case for
WP:ECP.
EdJohnston (
talk)
01:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – See history - IP Vandalism. ~
RhinosF1
(chat)/
(contribs)
15:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism immediately after unprotection. ~
RhinosF1
(chat)/
(contribs)
16:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Indefinite semi-protection often gets forgotten about, so I'd personally prefer to support semi-protection for up to, say, 12-24 months. Concurrent with that, I would recommend indefinite pending changes protection.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
21:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Works for me. I seem to have not specified temp/indef when adding this. ~ RhinosF1 (Chat) / (Contribs) 22:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
22:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
MikeTheEditor104 (
talk)
16:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – There have been a dozen or so additions in the last couple of days of unsourced information by IP addresses and very new users and removal of sourced information by IP users.
Dom from Paris (
talk)
16:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: I just had to delete a credit for a show that doesn't exist, and after scrolling through the page edit history, this seems to be an ongoing issue with the page stretching back to at least 2015. Protecting the page would fix this issue.
JacobJKilner (
talk)
13:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Past vandalism doesn't indicate future vandalism. If bad edits return, submit a new request here. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
S0091 (
talk)
19:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Reduce Protection to Semi-Protection The disruption seems to be caused by most
unregistered users.
Regice2020 (
talk)
09:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Then pending changes, which is a lower level of protection, is the most appropriate level of protection. Semi-protection would also block non-autoconfirmed registered users. Protecting administrator
MelanieN's decision to protect with pending changes, which allows rollback- and non-rollback permissioned editors to rollback non-confirmed edits, was, I think, the best outcome here. Let it play out the two weeks and, if semi-protection is warranted, then that can be considered. However, the way you've described it, this would be an increase of protection not needed.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
16:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done
MelanieN just applied pending changes yesterday, and that seems appropriate. If vandalism edits overwhelm the system, we can upgrade protection to semi-protection with pending changes. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DB1729 (
talk)
13:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Muboshgu.
El_C
18:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. --
LuK3
(Talk)
13:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pro wrestling titles
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It's the same problem I had with the Shine Championship and the WWE Intercontinental Championship. An IP makes the same edition, removing usefull templates from the aricles. I tried to talk with him, but he never answers. Once the article is protected, he changes the target and now, it's vandalicing this articles --
HHH Pedrigree (
talk)
15:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
16:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DB1729 (
talk)
13:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, particularly from IPs, every week, often concerning film's reception.
Wikibenboy94 (
talk)
15:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP-hopping
vandalism leading to revdel. --
BullRangifer (
talk)
16:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and BLP violations from IP-hopper.
Fentley (
talk)
17:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent edits on details without sources or references.
Migsmigss (
talk)
15:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Johnuniq.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like the previous protection just expired - and semi-protection wasn't adequate.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Confirmed users adding in details/information WITHOUT any sources or references.
Migsmigss (
talk)
21:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Brand new account POV edits the article. ---Wikaviani
(talk)
(contribs)
00:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Wikaviani: It is not clear why the two edits satisfy
WP:VAND. Please try to engage with the new editor. Explain why there is a problem on the article talk page and ask the new editor to contribute there. That might be a bit hard after the two warnings on the user's talk. Assuming this is not a perennial issue at that article (if it were, there should be a link to an explanation), it would be much better to explain things clearly without templates or more than a couple of blue links.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: Thanks for taking the time to review my demand. I am quite familiar with this article and every few weeks/months an IP or new account randomly changes the name, place of origin, etc ... without any explanation and/or reliable source. I get your point and this is rather disruptive than vandalism. Cheers.---Wikaviani
(talk)
(contribs)
07:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Wikaviani: Sorry but I don't have time at the moment to investigate. A quick look at the talk page and the most recent archive failed to find any explanation. I can see it might be a matter of nationalism where people want to boost their team but to justify protection there would have to be a link to a discussion showing clear consensus about what should appear in the article, and why other things like the recent Kurdistan should not.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Per the
discussion at
autoconfirmed editor 5patrickgilles5's talk page, as well as my own
talk page, I'm requesting temporary
extended confirmed protection of this redirect to allow the
consensus process at
RfD to play out. The editor insists on creating an uncited bibliographic entry for this article name, which I've kindly explained Wikipedia is
WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY and that the correct place to incubate their article is at
Draft:America is still the place. Since the editor is still not
assuming good faith and adhering to
WP:BRD,
WP:ECP for a week or so is necessary.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
22:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Dmehus: This is too confusing for WP:RFPP and it is
at ANI where any action should occur. It is unlikely that protection would be used to back one side in what boils down to a content dispute. It would be better if you did not raise so many issues with so many blue links—just focus on the article and why it should be protected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
06:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Johnuniq, Note: the decline is fine, but this wasn't a content dispute and that I wasn't involved. I was the disruptive editing-reverting editor, who undid the
good-faith attempt to create a non-acceptable sub-stub. When the editor refused and persisted, the editor failed to follow
WP:BRD and became disruptive, so, still not reporting him to
ANI, I requested page protection here first to let the
RfD that I established (since he had refused my offer to discuss at the talk page). Only after the
aspersion casting on my and his talk page did I take him to
ANI. He's been warned by myself, MarchJuly, John of Iregon, and administrator El C not to continue his disruptions. They seem to have abated, so protection is not warranted, but if he continues or resumes the disruptive, I will re-request protection here to let the RfD play out. Would that be okay?
Doug Mehus
T·
C
16:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing/edit warring.
Freeknowledgecreator (
talk)
09:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I might be involved with this topic otherwise I would semi it for a week and think about ECP later. Would another admin please investigate.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Article has previously been semi-protected for multiple months at a time, with consistent IP editing disruption, which justifies a longer-term block.
Fuzheado |
Talk
11:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs POV pushing their own capital cities.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
11:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Previously semi-protected for periods of 2019. Justifies longer protection.
Fuzheado |
Talk
11:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:Persistent
disruptive editing. High level of IP vandalism.
Wira rhea (
talk)
02:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This is a very heavily edited article right now, but I more constructive editing by IPs than the occasional IP vandalism.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
04:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing –
WP:TE by hopping IP.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
04:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
05:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Anon IPs vandalizing page.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
05:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Surachit (
talk)
06:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk)
09:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
08:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
The Grand Delusion(
Send a message)
16:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: I'm not familiar with the article subject, but I'm seeing little reverting in the page history which I would expect if there were a lot of disruptive editing going on.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I concur with
Ad Orientem's assessment. Only looked through the first page of 50 revisions and saw, maybe, one
good-faith reversion. Looking at a handful of diffs, I see a lot of excellent WikiGnoming and copyediting. I personally think this request should be declined.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. (
non-admin closure)
Doug Mehus
T·
C
18:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated
vandalism by IP and new users.
Aman Kumar Goel(
Talk)
19:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection or pending changes protection: Persistent IP vandalism that definitely violates BLP policies. Their edits have been reverted by me and other users but as soon as the page gets unprotected they start it all over again.
Keivan.f
Talk
23:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Each article protected to try to break habit.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
01:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:Persistent.
Mark299 (
talk)
16:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
John from Idegon (
talk)
22:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism drowning the edit history. --
Pontificalibus
22:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support per
Pontificalibus.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
00:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP;
List of The Good Place episodes was protected for same reasons; and because a user continually makes disruptive edits removing sourced content "
fantasy series" in the lede (which is sourced in the infobox) and replaces it with their own POV comments such as "
middle brow".
Drovethrughosts (
talk)
17:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by IPs and new users, who seem to be working in tandem as well as bad \-hand good-hand edits. I've also opened a SPI
here.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
18:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple new accounts vandalizing the page.
McSly (
talk)
19:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary page protection: persistent rising or upcoming disruptive edits.
Regice2020 (
talk)
06:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
MelanieN, multiple users/ip addresses have been adding livestreams and external links. They have also been covering each others edits, so a simple revert doesn't work and they have been adding the links back as soon as they are removed. Could you take another look at this one? Thank you.
Lcodyh803 (
talk)
00:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment @
MelanieN: Those disruptive edits with link are usually infected and sends bad network traffic upon clicking. That was the reason why i requested early page protection to avoid some disruptive edits of infection links. These link can be easily accidentally clicked upon loading the page or simply scrolling with touchscreens .
Regice2020 (
talk)
00:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Agreed. It's disrupting a lot the article. It happens frequently in UFC events, specially PPVs.
Gsfelipe94 (
talk)
01:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I suspect maybe
MelanieN "declined" protection because the disruptive editors were already blocked and perhaps forgot to use the "users blocked" template instead? From what I'm seeing, there's not enough disruptive activity for temporary page protection, particularly the proactive protection sought. MelanieN may, on the other hand, consider pending changes protection. I would be supportive of that.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for the input and advice, all. I hadn't realized the nature of the bad edits, and I did see that IPs seem to be doing a lot of constructive editing. PC will allow the constructive edits while preventing the bad edits from going "live."
MelanieN (
talk)
01:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
aboideau
talk
15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term school IP/new editor vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP. --
Scrum1 (
talk)
22:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by
CIreland (
non-admin closure)
Doug Mehus
T·
C
00:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Plandu (
talk)
22:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done by
CIreland already. See above request. (
non-admin closure)
Doug Mehus
T·
C
00:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Elizium23 (
talk)
15:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. ~~
Alex Noble
- talk
17:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Brojam (
talk)
19:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
JTP (
talk •
contribs)
20:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Well intended additions but BLP issues still, also issues understanding converntional date system as per MOS:DATEUNIFY.
Hell in a Bucket (
talk)
15:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry –
WP:LTA/NDC.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
16:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A couple of IPs geolocating to Romania have been vandalizing this and other related articles in the Billboard Year-End Hot 100 charts series. One of the addresses was blocked for a time, but another address (possibly the same person) is continuing to vandalize the article. Judging from the addresses, a range block is far from likely given how wide the range is (both are in 2a02:2f0d:0:0:0:0:0:0/32).
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
16:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
LakesideMiners
Come Talk To Me!
17:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pending changes isn't helping; unsupported figures keep getting added.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
12:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
13:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism. Some edits aren't caught for months.
Bulhis899 (
talk)
13:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
14:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Re-introduction of heavily promo language by two AC editors. (Please note, sent to RFPP as I'm now
involved).
Nosebagbear (
talk)
13:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure why you think semi wouldn't do the trick — these are non-confirmed users.
El_C
14:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Two IPs from Russia keep deleting sourced section. Edit summaries and comments on article and my talk page suggest POV and unfamiliarity with wikipedia procedures. Seems more like vandalism that a legitimate content dispute.
Tom (North Shoreman) (
talk)
14:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
14:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk)
08:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of unconstructive IP edits following the film's Academy Award wins.
KyleJoan
talk
10:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
KyleJoan, there was a constructive IP edit this morning, so I went with PC instead. Will that do?
Guy (
help!)
11:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- PC would be very helpful! Thank you,
Guy!
KyleJoan
talk
11:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
JzG.
El_C
12:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Radio, Cable and Television stations vandal
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Long-term abuse IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
11:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
12:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – SPAs and IPs continue to add content that is NPOV, refuse to engage on the talk page, and make accusations against experienced editors accusing them of being one of the subject who founded the awards. Appears to be a single user from different IP addresses but cannot be for certain. Would request protection so that user needs to establish an account and engage in discussion on the talk page (where I have already previously started a discussion). .
CNMall41 (
talk)
07:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – 2 weeks needed. —
Vaibhavafro
💬
09:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
09:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Recent disruption by IPs and new users. .
TFFfan (
talk)
10:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
10:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Unregistered users have been making satirical or outright nonsensical claims about him for about a year, though with low frequency. A screenshot from the article was recently uploaded to the popular Facebook group TWTMEGP, so there's a good chance it will get worse during the following week or so. I don't know if a short or long term solution would be more appropiate. –
OfficialURL (
talk)
00:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. I see constructive contributions from anonymous IP editors, so I'm hesitant to semi-protect, and I believe that pending-changes protection would only create more work for others. If another admin wants to apply PCP, I have no objection. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
00:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Semi-protection just expired. This is a very controversial article and it's never beneficial when this article is not semi-protected. I think it's best that it have indefinite semi-protection instead of repeatedly re-applying it.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
02:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
El_C
02:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El C, articles that are subjected to persistent disruption and vandalism are routinely indefinitely semi-protected after assessment. We know from history that it's never a good thing for this article to be unprotected. We don't need to wait for the next time that disruption happens.
Acroterion shouldn't have to keep applying semi-protection. Maybe I should have went straight to Acroterion about this. This request isn't much different than me requesting that you restore indefinite semi-protection to the
Race and intelligence article, except that it had indefinite semi-protection before it temporarily had full-protection.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk) 02:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Updated post.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
02:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- You can see that I haven't protected it for very long either, despite the lengthy protection log. Le's see how it goes.
Acroterion
(talk)
02:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (
edit conflict)
Flyer22 Frozen, the fact is that he did set the protection to expire, which means that re-instating it at this time would constitute a preemptive action.
El_C
02:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Acroterion, thanks for commenting. I don't think we should wait or that it should have temporary semi-protection yet again. But okay.
- El C, I've seen admins come along and apply indefinite or long-term semi-protection after assessment, and that includes the current
indefinite long-term semi-protection of the
Pansexuality article. That is what I mean. But fine. Let's watch the disruption happen yet again.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
02:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Sorry, Flyer22, sometimes we just have to go through the motions.
El_C
02:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Recent disruptive edits by sockpuppets and IP-hoppers (sockmaster
User:ShaynDiamond).
Wario-Man (
talk)
06:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Edit warring against sources and apparent consensus on talk page.
Aman Kumar Goel(
Talk)
07:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple additions of unsourced content. --
LuK3
(Talk)
01:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
01:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
TheTVExpert (
talk)
01:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
01:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: I'd like to fix this double redirect, and since the redirect was protected by
Vassyana some 12 years ago, I don't think indefinite sysop-level protection is required anymore. Having said that, given the topical nature of the title of the redirect and its target, I do think it could be beneficial to downgrade protection to either of semi-protection or pending changes. I'm asking here because I noted that Vassyana appears to have been procedurally desysopped due to inactivity many years ago, and pinging them in case they wish to comment.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
19:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I noticed that the
History of early Christianity to which this redirect redirects in the double-redirect is not fully protected (it's not protected at all), neither is the end article page
Early Christianity. Given that there has been no vandalism to that redirect, I'm inclined to think
WP:AUTOCONFIRMED, at most
WP:ECP, protection should be sufficient for both the
history merge redirects. I'll update the
WP:RfPP request. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Dmehus, the redirect has been fixed, I see. Should we consider this resolved? It may not need the full protection, but I don't see any benefit in reducing it either. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Muboshgu, Reducing the protection level to
WP:ECP indefinitely would allow any extendedconfirmed editor to patrol the
Special:BrokenRedirects and fix this without having to wait for an admin to respond in a day or two to the edit request. More importantly, though, due to priorities of admins, such broken redirects languish for months until such a request is made. And finally, I'd note that
History of early Christianity, which is also maintained for
WP:HISTMERGE purposes is unprotected with no vandalism. Thus, I think protecting one or both at
WP:AUTOCONFIRMED or
WP:ECP would provide the level of protection required. What do you think?
Doug Mehus
T·
C
18:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected I think that things change in 12 years and there's no reason not to lower the protection on this redirect to ECP. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
18:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Muboshgu Sounds good, I've added rcats {{
R from merge}} and {{
R with history}} to better identify this redirect's purpose. This should also allow the bots to fix the double-redirects, as I assume bots are at extendedconfirmed-equivalent level? And secondly, as the most recent administrator to alter protection, should future changes be warranted in another 12 years, should editors go to you first (assuming you haven't retired your mop)?
Doug Mehus
T·
C
18:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving... (
non-admin closure)
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Dmehus, this request does not need to be closed or immediately archived. The rfpp template has already been invoked, so the bot would have gotten to it.
El_C
01:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El C, Oh, do you know how Cyberbot's archiving schedule works? It's archived requests completed after this one, so that's why I was confused.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Dmehus, I think it does ECP a bit more slowly than semi.
El_C
01:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El C, Ah, that makes sense. Thanks. I had wondered if maybe it did the unprotection request archiving more slowly than the protection requests (due to less unprotection requests). Sorry for adding the archive tag.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
01:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued addition of unsourced content/info.
Magitroopa (
talk)
18:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Various ip addresses have been continuously vandalizing this article by changing episode titles to nonsense episode titles again after the article became no longer page protected. It was previously semi-protected for a week. —
YoungForever
(talk)
19:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
TFFfan (
talk)
21:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous addition of unsourced contents and disruptive edits by IPs. .
Za-ari-masen (
talk)
21:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, evidently from Kobe Bryant fans following King's controversial interview.
Tenebrae (
talk)
21:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over a number of months.
DarkGlow (
talk)
21:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
23:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. Should be protected until at least a few days after the game has finished.
TheTVExpert (
talk)
21:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent IPs stopping by to keep adding some fictional horse. Multiple protections have lapsed and it keeps returning. It's a very low-edit dab page otherwise and not much is lost by leaving the semi-protection indefinitely. –
Deacon Vorbis (
carbon •
videos)
22:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose indefinite semi-protection as it often gets forgotten about.
- Support long-term semi-protection of between 1-2 years.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
23:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El C, don't forget about it, though. ;)
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Already forgotten!
El_C
23:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- LOL. No worries, I'm just teasing. I guess it's not a big deal; it is, after all, only indefinite semi-protection. And, it's a dab page where vandalism and content disputes can go unnoticed.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full-protection: Vandalism and false/unsourced information — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.98.57.43 (
talk) 14:23, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Full protection is rarely granted and, when it is, it's usually temporary to restore the status quo ante and allow talk page discussions between
Extended Confirmed editors in a content dispute. I'm not seeing a need for anything besides temporary semi-protection or, preferably, temporary pending changes protection. Both of these would solve the problem at hand. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This needs to be discussed by the involved editors. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
23:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support on a rolling 1-week basis, but
FlightTime, where is the talk page discussion you've started? Consider this support conditional on you starting a talk page discussion and considering an
RfC as necessary. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Dmehus: I have not started a discussion, I have nothing to do with the dispute. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
23:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
FlightTime, Oh, thanks for clarifying. What I still do, though, is start the discussion but don't participate. See
Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home for what I do.
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I'd rather stay away, if I can :P -
FlightTime (
open channel)
23:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Dmehus, idea: stopp offering the benefit of your inexperience everywhere in project space. It's boring.
Guy (
help!)
23:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent edit warring over which person should be housed at the Tyler Freeman article. Which one should be housed there needs to be worked out. And after that? It's clear to me that the article should be indefinitely semi-protected to ward off this type of edit warring.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
23:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Family member not getting it (COI) keeps removing the subjects birth date,she (his wife) thinks she owns the page and we're working to make her under stand. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
22:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done by
Kingboyk -
FlightTime (
open channel)
23:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by
kingboyk (
non-admin closure) --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism over a long period of time from IP editors. Nearly every IP edit made is vandalism. Previous temporary protection does not appear to have slowed the vandalism. This page probably gets a lot of attention from young students, with the attendant vandalism problems.
Tdc42 (
talk)
22:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose indefinite semi-protection as it often gets forgotten about.
- Support long-term semi-protection of between 1-2 years. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
23:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from an IP.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
23:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Support long-term semi-protection of between 1-2 years. --
Doug Mehus
T·
C
23:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from an IP. Same one mentioned above.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
23:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long term disruption by anonymous users. .
TFFfan (
talk)
13:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
18:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated BLP vandalism by IPs, given
A podcast with previous CEO making comments about Steve Ritchie. See page history.
Tutelary (
talk)
17:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
18:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Hoping for a long-ish term protection on this page. As you can see in the history, it has been a target of regular but not necessarily intense vandalism.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
17:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
18:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violation. . --
LuK3
(Talk)
18:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
18:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
05:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Sakiv (
talk)
07:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bbb23. Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Non-administrator comment)
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
17:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: -
Several ips have been adding un-sourced BLP details at David Pakman (I would provide diffs but am confined to mobile editing atm) today. This matches a pattern of recent vandalism on the article.
SamHolt6 (
talk)
14:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist. Page was semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Non-administrator comment)
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
17:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: A couple IPs have hijacked the AfD since it's been closed. Probably can go as high up as you need on protection level since this in theory shouldn't be need to be edited again (DRV excepted).
SportingFlyer
T·
C
03:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I have watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Sorry, didn't see your note. I semi-protected it for a week. You can unprotect it if you want, but I don't see much point in letting IPs continue to edit a closed AfD.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
09:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- If you think a week will be enough...this is not like it's gonna have a great impact one way or the other.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- This happens a bit with YouTube deletions, thought I'd get out in front of it.
SportingFlyer
T·
C
10:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Brojam (
talk)
04:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DoebLoggs (
talk)
09:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's an LTA vandal. Let me know if he comes back.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
10:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Current President of Mexico. Article is experiencing high levels of vandalism that it makes it difficult for users to keep up with. I had to add it to my watchlist just a few days ago and the problem continues. Term ends in 2024 but I want to at least suggest a year-long protection. Many thanks,
MX (
✉ •
✎)
01:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
03:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content, stemming from last protection, as well as violations of multiple MOS policies.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection IP
disruptive editing following recent internet meme.
Seco86484 (
talk)
02:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP users continue to mess up the tables on the page.
JE98 (
talk)
21:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
23:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent deletion of content by IP users or single user with multiple addresses. .
—JlACEer (
talk)
22:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
23:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Deep
fried
okra
23:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An absolute horror show of IP vandalism. As soon as the previous protection was lifted this page was flooded with it.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk)
02:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Oshwah.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. IP users keep adding false entries to this sourced list of chart #1s.
Doc Strange
Mailbox
Logbook
02:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Extensive long term socking by multiple socks and IPs (all the blocked accounts and IPs in the 39.51.* range you see belong to the same master).
Gotitbro (
talk)
17:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations and apparent block evasion from IPs.
Indignant Flamingo (
talk)
20:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping
vandalism after recent end of previous protection.
Fentley (
talk)
20:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Long-term addition of unsourced
WP:BLP /
WP:DOB.
Toddst1 (
talk)
23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
Deep
fried
okra
23:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
23:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Long-standing title is grammatically correct, but keeps getting moved to an incorrectly-grammared title. .
——
SN
54129
12:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Here it might actually prove beneficial to wait a little. The discussion on the talk-page might lead somewhere.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lectonar: you mean, you would like us to discuss wehther or not our page titles should be grammatically incorrect?
——
SN
54129
12:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- No, I hope the other side accepts that the title is correct.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done. Matter settled amicably.
Favonian (
talk)
18:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?
16:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Jingiby (
talk)
16:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. IP user has not edited since being warned.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: User continuing to add
WP:OR information (completely going against
WP:SYNTHESIS).
Magitroopa (
talk)
17:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined content dispute. Appears to have been resolved at
WP:NORN.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Upcoming TV show with high level of IP vandalism/false changes to cast list every few days.
TheFallenPower (
talk)
18:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
18:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
18:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
19:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism almost every day. Page has been protected several times in the past but only for several weeks maximum.
Wikibenboy94 (
talk)
13:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP/new editor school vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User's new IP blocked too for good measure.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with promotional content.
GreaterPonce665 (
talk)
16:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. --
LuK3
(Talk)
17:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. what's the deal with all this vandalism? –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Anon continually removes sourced material.
——
SN
54129
08:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁
(❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁)
09:03, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Two days of IP and newly created accounts making unconstructive edits. A brief protection may encourage them to move on.
Ifnord (
talk)
15:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
15:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (
diff,
diff).
Ythlev (
talk)
06:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: It's slow motion but persistent. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent disruption by unregistered users and socks. Article is already under 1RR.
ML
911
10:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Yet another external conflict spilling into Wikipediia. --
Deep
fried
okra
14:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Creator originally made Dupo Community High School in mainspace which I had moved to draftspace. Creator then made this one in mainspace of the same content with "Community" missing from the name. I've now moved this one to draftspace with histmerge requested. Requesting create protection so creator can continue to work on this in the draftspace and prevent recreation in mainspace.
Steven (Editor) (
talk)
01:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- To be honest I think communicating with the creator via their talk page will be more efficient.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined I agree; indirect communication is rarely successful.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
04:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
04:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk)
05:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by multiple IP addresses and sock puppets.
Toasted Meter (
talk)
10:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – repeated vandalism from IP addresses.
Coderzombie (
talk)
10:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection Unsourced edits and edit warring from IP users.
Instaurare (
talk)
05:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Very highly visible pages
Temporary full move protect: Multiple moves without consensus.
Temporary semi-protection: High level disruption.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done I have move-protected both, and added semi-protection for the second article. Tbh, I don't know enough about the topic to be sure if extended-confirmed protection is needed.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent mindless IP vandalism following unexpected death.
Ghmyrtle (
talk)
08:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots and lots of unsourced edits from IP and new editors as a season of this show is about to end. Please protect until after 2/15 to deal with the abundance of edits around the winner based on their hopes and beliefs, not actual sources.
Ravensfire (
talk)
00:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ponyo.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
01:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent mindless
vandalism from IP accounts.
Fiachra10003 (
talk)
02:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of unconstructive IP edits following the film's release.
KyleJoan
talk
10:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – In the
RfD deletion discussion for the redirect
America is still the place, the two IP editors (one with an IPv6 address and the other with the IPv4 98.207.199.20 IP address) have been making the same, or substantially the same, comments as each other and which have largely been cross-posted from
User talk:5patrickgilles5. All editors on the log page in question are at or above Autoconfirmed level, so there would be no disruption. Crucially, this would encourage
5patrickgilles5 to make comments and arguments using only one account.
Doug Mehus
T·
C 23:17, 10 February 2020 (UT
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent personal accusations and lack of impartiality and good faith.
sockpuppetry as defined by a Single user creating Multiple accounts and posting from those multiple accounts. The user 5patrickgilles5 maintains only one account under the name
User talk:5patrickgilles5 and has never maintained any other account(s), by any other name. Accusser Dmehus most show suspected multiple accounts by name or retract withdrawl.
5patrickgilles5 (
talk) 03:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
2601:647:301:A70:1102:1FBA:2F78:DA1D (
talk)
00:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Comment
5patrickgilles5 was editing both logged in and as an IP editor, until
Dmehus explained the policy on that behavior, so 5p5 has been going back to their IP edits to include their account name in an attempt to rectify their mistake, that's why the comments are showing two signatures.
Schazjmd
(talk)
18:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined This can't be solved via protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Seeing a content dispute between a few editors regarding recent events involving the article subject. --
LuK3
(Talk)
19:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Just a note, looks like there is a BLPN discussion taking place, see
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Amber_Heard_and_Johnny_Depp_defamation_case. --
LuK3
(Talk)
20:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. This has already started, see above. Editing has somewhat slowed down too.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:03, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – We have a persistent IP adding disruptive garbage to this particular talk page. Protecting the talk page for a couple of weeks might discourage him enough to stop the behaviour.
Tarl N. (
discuss)
01:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. This is always the same IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full-protection: Persistent back and forth reverting. I started a discussion section on the talk page. Full-protection will allow the matter to be hashed out there without further edit warring.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
04:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Update: Full protection no longer needed.
QEDK has handled matters regarding this article.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
22:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk)
23:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continual vandalism.
Jorm (
talk)
23:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- This user appears to be gaming the system to try to gain the upper hand in a content dispute. The article history shows occasional vandalism but more prominent is the user's repeated insertion of the actor's ethnicity into the opening sentence, which numerous other editors have undone.
51.7.23.117 (
talk)
00:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:03, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Resumption of non-constructive edits by IPs and recently registered users. Page got automatically unprotected for them after it was fully protected some weeks ago.
Bharatiya
29
07:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected – the state of affairs prior to the temporary full protection.
Favonian (
talk)
16:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: A recent spate of disruptive editing by socks of
Shameel Done. –
Uanfala (talk)
19:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent and long term vandalism and disruption from IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. This is merely a DAB page; nothing is lost by keeping out IPs and brand new accounts.
Crossroads
-talk-
19:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs and new accounts since previous protection ended in mid-January. --
LuK3
(Talk)
20:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The same disruptive edit occuring within hours of the previous protection ending. It's also worth noting that this neo-nazi bs has been happening since mid-November.
[4]
Alivardi (
talk)
22:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – For recent move warring with
Fall-Out.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk)
23:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Move protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Has been semi-protected twice now and there is still a high level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. Please protect this page indefinitely.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
08:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Hello. The current issue has been discussed in talk pages but issues still persist. There is still constant vandalism to this page and that’s why it was protected twice previously. This page should be protected indefinitely as there is regular IP vandalism present. If it were protected indefinitely it would cause far less disruptive edits and there would be less need to try and reason with IP vandals.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
19:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – It is a featured article but unregistered users have been making disruptive edits to it for several months.
LightPirate (
talk)
18:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done. Restored indefinite semi from 2011 that got reset in 2019.
El_C
22:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP.
List of The Good Place episodes was protected but once it was lifted recently, the same editing resumed.
The Good Place has been protected for the same reasons and
The Good Place (season 4) needs protection for the same reason.
Drovethrughosts (
talk)
19:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, both, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
22:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full-protection: High level of edit-warring beginning in the article. Note that a full prot had to be used on this article before; doing so appears to have been the only thing to get long-term editors to come to the table and sort out a compromise consensus. New edits are defying that consensus version (seen
here), and there is very little reason to believe that it will stop with a single revert. -
Jack Sebastian (
talk)
05:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now. When this page was full-protected a month ago, it was because of an edit you were reverting which is essentially the same edit you are currently reverting. The current RfC is quickly leaning into a
WP:SNOW close in favour of that edit, and besides we've already tried protection and I don't see how doing the same thing again is supposed to help. I
can think of something that will, though. Do you see where I'm going with this?
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An increase in protection seems necessary due to the recent high amount of IP vandalism.
Krimuk2.0 (
talk)
07:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is being edited too heavily for pending changes to be of much help. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing re subject header "
Jonathan Field" and asks users to change as above. Some users who watch the page are unhappy with edits made by the "many IP addresses" above.
Iggy (
Swan) (
Contribs)
15:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Iggy the Swan: this page doesn't exist. Can you check your post and correct to which page you're requesting protection for?
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Oops, it should be this:-
-
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football (
|
subject |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Declined - the situation on the WikiProject talk page seems to be resolved, and the target page (
Matthew Lowton) is already protected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
IPA template tables
Indefinite semi-protection: The core content of the parent templates has been split into these subpages since the parents were indefinitely semi-protected, rendering the protection less effective. The templates are used to provide navigation links in hundreds of pages, including
International Phonetic Alphabet and
International Phonetic Alphabet chart, which receive thousands of pageviews every day. This has resulted in inexperienced editors, though in good faith they may be, experimenting with the tables without realizing the disruptive consequences they have on these pages.
Nardog (
talk)
23:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected indefinitely.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk)
06:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Kosack (
talk)
13:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs (unnecessarily changing UK English to US English).
Citobun (
talk)
07:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. The IP editor has a history of doing this.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
11:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism.
Csigabi (
talk)
09:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Transfer rumour in the media causing may premature edits .
JMHamo (
talk)
12:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk)
13:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: - Persistent vandalism or non-constructive edits. I checked the article's history for the past two months and I think every IP edit had to be reverted.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
13:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping
vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Last two protections were six months each.
Plomm (
talk)
02:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
11:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from IP editors over the last few months.
Tdc42 (
talk)
04:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
12:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the course of months, mostly by anonymous users, due to its status as an Internet meme. --Posted by
Pikamander2
(Talk) at
10:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
12:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, 5+ incidents in the past few days, BLP violations. Heidecker recently did an episode of "On Cinema" where his character/twitter account "changed" his last name to Newman. His fan base is particularly active and I don't see the anonymous rewrites of the article to "Tim Newman" going away for at least the next few months.
Blervis (
talk)
02:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: high level of edit warring by anon IPs and a banned user.
LibStar (
talk)
06:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
11:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – long history of vandalism/protections, most ip edits unconstructive.
Will120 (
talk)
09:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Steven (Editor) (
talk)
20:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined They've only created it twice.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Disruptive edits by new user related to the Macedonia naming dispute. Quite possibly a sock of the blocked editor
BorchePetkovski (
talk ·
contribs) that used to make the
same
edits repeatedly at
2019 North Macedonian presidential election.
Number
5
7
23:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
caknuck
° needs to be running more often
23:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent namecruft .
John from Idegon (
talk)
23:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism by anonymous users.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
23:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --
Gyanda (
talk)
00:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content –
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Italian Anime Vandal. Seems pretty disruptive on a regular basis.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
00:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Due to controversy in the news, this will attract even further vandals .
Madbrad200 (
talk)
00:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, with some potential BLP violations and COI issues.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk)
02:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Thinker78 (
talk)
21:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
caknuck
° needs to be running more often
23:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Nate Speed target.
Crboyer (
talk)
21:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
NawlinWiki.
caknuck
° needs to be running more often
23:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
22:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
caknuck
° needs to be running more often
23:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism. Consistently has content wiped to enforce people's personal views, content arbitrarily altered to make the article worse, insults and attacks injected into the article, etc. —
LissanX (
talk)
22:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding a large, unsourced and very unlikely list of celebrities supposedly starring in this unreleased film.
Risker (
talk)
22:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Huon.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hyperbolic and unsourced edits, especially from fans who are depicting the film as receiving better reception than it actually is (as with an film/product with a dedicated base).
TropicAces (
talk)
01:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)tropicAces
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued vandalism, has been temp semi-protected 7 times in last couple years, time for longer protection imo.
Doublah (
talk)
19:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – For the past year, there has been a continual slow-running edit-war between various IPs and new accounts, regarding the addition and deletion of a lengthy (half the entire article) critical section. I have no idea who is right, but this continued misbehaviour cannot be allowed to continue without any attempt to discuss this on the talk page. .
RolandR (
talk)
21:36, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see whether pending changes would work--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An anon seems to want to get a blog onto the project...
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IP hopper.
Giant
Snowman
20:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Recent Minor disruption seems to have come from a localised IP, likely the same person. Not enough activity for now.
Kosack (
talk)
17:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated IP warring.
Cloud200 (
talk)
13:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only edited by one other user in the last three weeks with a constructive edit.
Kosack (
talk)
17:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
The4lines (
talk)
17:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Risker (
talk)
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppet adding humongous gallery to article continuing edits of master account.
Dr.
K.
16:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Editor warned.
Drmies (
talk)
16:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated removal of all content critical of the subject.
Tartan357 (
talk)
05:57, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP block vandal.
robertsky (
talk)
07:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Severe vandalism over the last few days.
Java
Hurricane
10:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Attempting whitewashing by IP (?hopping) for over two days.
Ifnord (
talk)
18:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection.
CLCStudent (
talk)
17:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: More info needed. I'm not seeing a lot of reverted edits which is a common indication of persistent disruptive editing.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Some of this is borderline BLP violations.
Risker (
talk)
18:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Darkwarriorblake /
SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
18:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Consistent vandalism; not a super high edit volume, but almost all by non-autoconfirmed users are bad. Various protections have been used previously.
LittlePuppers (
talk)
18:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's see how this goes.
Risker (
talk)
19:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – An IP keeps deleting referenced/cited material and refuses to engage on the Talk Page. I need temporary RPP to get them to discuss this properly. .
Britishfinance (
talk)
14:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
15:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Rumors of subject's death is being circulated online. Just because of wrong wikipedia entries, bloodshed has taken place in Kashmir many times in the past.
[5].
ML
911
08:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (Non-administrator comment) Oppose
My Lord articles are not protected on the anticipation of disruption. I cannot see any edit in page history related to this concern. If there are notable rumours maybe you can update the article that there had been rumours. There isn't any recent disruption that merits a protection.
DBig
Xrayᗙ
08:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: There are edits meriting a biref semi --
Deep
fried
okra
13:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Deepfriedokra, Did the recent vandalism after my comment led to the protection or was it already ripe for protection. (just trying to understand the tipping point)
DBig
Xrayᗙ
18:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
DBigXray: of mempry serves, it was before and after negative BLP. 2 days should give time for the matter of their death to clarify. BUt yeah, the one after made me feel the need to SP. That article has problems.--
Deep
fried
okra
19:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Deepfriedokra, thanks for the reply.
DBig
Xrayᗙ
19:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Risker (
talk)
19:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection : Apparent ongoing edit warring with lack of talk page input.
Aman Kumar Goel(
Talk)
11:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. This is a ridiculous four- or five-way edit war. All recent participants have been blocked. Protection declined.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (Non-administrator comment) ...All except one. Article now protected by
El C--
DBig
Xrayᗙ
18:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: sorry, I missed this request — thanks for the ping,
DBigXray, which brought it to my attention. Anyway, I just noticed that the edit war continued despite the various partial blocks issued, so I fully protected the page for a long while (one month) — that duration is not set in stone, however, and may end up being lifted early.
El_C
18:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Risker (
talk)
19:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Funny that this says "lack of talk page input". Which is just a lie. -
Roxy, the PROD. .
wooF
19:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: I see no issues on the talk page, or the edit history, so I think that this article is good to be unprotected.
Minecrafter0271 (
talk)
22:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Ping
Airplaneman, the protecting admin.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Minecrafter0271, is not the reason that there are no issues in the edit history because the article is semi-protected? –
Muboshgu (
talk)
20:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Muboshgu: Imagine this scenario. A vandal on Wikipedia learns that their not auto-conformed. What can that vandal do? Wait until they're auto-conformed, then go nuts. I also would like to bring up sock puppets. If they create a sock puppet, who does good things until their auto-conformed, they can also go nuts. So, given the fact that this hasn't happened to the article in question, I think that it's safe.
Minecrafter0271 (
talk)
22:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not unprotected. Maybe some other time, if a bona fide editor makes a convincing case.
Favonian (
talk)
16:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Risker (
talk)
19:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Has been protected since 2016 and is protected until the middle of 2021.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
01:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: Pinging protecting admin @
Materialscientist:
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
01:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment:: Actually, it has been semi-protected since 2009 because it has always been a magnet for vandalism, and had required a significant number of semi-protections in the years before then. For a short period, it was flipped over to pending changes but most edits were vandalism, which showed it was not a suitable candidate for PC. It would need to be watched very closely if unprotected.
Risker (
talk)
04:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not unprotected. Juveniles and vandals being what they are, this article will remain a target.
Favonian (
talk)
16:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Risker (
talk)
19:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Suggesting indefinite semi-protection. Pending changes was applied to this page in July 2019, but since then there have been
lots of vandalism reverts and only a number of constructive IP edits (6-7 if I counted correctly). Looking through the
protection log, the vandalism has continued after multiple protections, so I doubt it would stop when protection expires. Note that
Light (which has a similar number of pageviews) is indefinitely semi-protected. –
Sonicwave
talk
00:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected.
Favonian (
talk)
16:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Creation protected indefinitely.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
SangrurUser (
talk)
06:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Just look at the magnitude of the vandalism I had to revert. .
Java
Hurricane
10:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Make sure to wish your loved ones!
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Fairly often and intermittent vandalism lately, but there have been some helpful IP edits periodically as well.
Red Phoenix
talk
12:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
16:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Citobun (
talk)
03:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
03:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeatedly adding hate speech.
2409:4073:2093:83CC:4D84:9664:C715:8D44 (
talk)
14:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
15:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The page title speaks for itself as to why it should be protected.
L293D (
☎ •
✎)
14:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
15:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: Article has been protected three times previously for persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs and is still continuing when the article in unprotected. Asking for a longer protection period please and thanks.
Drovethrughosts (
talk)
15:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
15:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistant disruptive editing.
Semsurî (
talk)
15:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Looks like things have calmed down.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
17:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
02:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Valuable edits from non-confirmed users, unclear what edits you'd think were disruptive.
Risker (
talk)
03:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: Sorry I nominated the wrong page by accident.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
03:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by multiple IPs.
Za-ari-masen (
talk)
13:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Looks like a content dispute.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP edits vandalising article, recently appointed to senior role in British Government. Suggest 24hrs-48hrs should be enough.
Cowlibob (
talk)
13:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High amount of vandalism from IP editors and vandalism-only accounts, especially over the last week.
Tdc42 (
talk)
05:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
06:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by IPs. .
Za-ari-masen (
talk)
12:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IPs continuously
WP:DE, changing names without any explanation or source whatsoever.
Magitroopa (
talk)
17:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Qzd (
talk)
04:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
Risker (
talk)
04:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – This biography of a celebrity who recently outed themselves is still getting homophobic vandalism.
Lord Belbury (
talk)
14:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
15:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandal returned after protection lapsed .
Ravensfire (
talk)
16:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: There has been a lot of disruptive edits and vandalism on the page. Page protection is needed to ensure such edits do not happen.
Oddparents (
talk)
07:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, semi-protection for at least two weeks would help.
KCVelaga (
talk)
08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP vandalism.
Lulusword
(talk)
11:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection : Persisten IP vandalism.
Andrew Hendo(
Talk)
12:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
JTP (
talk •
contribs)
15:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
"Mike Matthews17" troll pages (2)
Indefinate semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The former has had eight protections and is a popular page which has been affected by IP vandalism in the recent months, the latter requests page move vandalism from Mike Matthews17 and his many IP addresses.
Iggy (
Swan) (
Contribs)
15:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done
Joe Hart
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Talk:Matthew Lowton
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Ad Orientem (
talk)
03:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Has been protected for 12 years. I do not see any reason to keep it at this moment. Of course keep it's move protection.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
02:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Acalamari: Any objections? -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It's cool...after 12 years you don't need to ask permission but thanks, anyway! :)
Acalamari
10:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Actually, it looks as though it's been
15 years, as all I did was introduce move protection to deal with Grawp attacks at the time. Semi-protection was introduced sooner.
Acalamari
10:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: Pinging protecting admin (if you are still around) @
UtherSRG:
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
21:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Do it! -
UtherSRG
(talk)
22:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected Move protection is still in place.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yes it has. Bad cyberbot. No dessert for you. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Nickayane99 (
talk)
13:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Valuable edits from non-confirmed users.
El_C
21:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Akhiljaxxn (
talk)
18:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- To admin, issue is
content dispute by Akhiljaxxn. No disruptive editing as you can see.
137.97.82.237 (
talk)
19:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I don't see why both versions can't be integrated together, anyway.
El_C
22:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: There is continued vandalism on this page; IP editors are constantly blanking the page without reason.
Bibliac (
talk)
18:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Pivotal project space information page — watched by many.
El_C
22:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Florida339 (
talk)
11:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefnite semi-protection: Parsistent sock puppetry (by an IP hopper) and removal of sourced content. Was previously protected for a month before but the edits returned after it was unprotected. 14:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. IP can be blocked. Others are making valid edits.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, IP has broke 3RR.
Haseo9999 (
talk)
17:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked.
El_C
17:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: - Persistent
vandalism by an IP user; lacks description of change, deletes or adds content without sources.
Oliszydlowski (
talk)
17:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Repeated violations of BLP guidelines after previous protections.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
17:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes is not enough.
El_C
17:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent hopping IP vandalism/disruptive unsourced BLP editing. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
17:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional material, inline links and removal of all sources by IP hopping editor.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk)
18:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated reinsertion of text copied word-for-word from source).
Number
5
7
14:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Take it to the talk page.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – edit war between anon users.
Pelmeen10 (
talk)
14:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Ongoing vandalism and disruptive BLP violations, mainly from IPs. It's slowed somewhat since the last unprotected period, but still pretty regular. 2 recent edits have had to be suppressed.
Benny White (
talk)
16:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of erroneous/unreferenced information with sources and references that are either non-RS (Facebook/Instagram) or none at all.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Needs some details or diffs. I'm not seeing any recent reversions which is an indicator of problematic editing.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
El_C
17:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Increase protection: Recently this specific article caught a attention from a known media outlet to avoid sneaky disruptive edits please increase protection.
[1]
Regice2020 (
talk)
01:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
El_C
17:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending-changes protection: IP vandalism.
2409:4073:217:A60C:406C:323A:E7F5:5B52 (
talk)
10:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Kosack (
talk)
13:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and many disruptive edits.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
10:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
the wub
"?!"
15:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Content dispute with new editor. -
FlightTime Phone (
open channel)
04:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
FlightTime Phone: I warned the user not to repeat their change without consensus. Ping me if problems persist.
Johnuniq (
talk)
06:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: They've seemed to have quit for today. Thanx. Cheers, -
FlightTime Phone (
open channel)
06:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing since un-protection.
userdude
05:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
09:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Extreme edit warring by two a few IPs. One claims the other is being reverted on grounds of
WP:DENY.
Dark
Knight
2149
07:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Anonymous IPs vandalizing page.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
08:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bilby.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. Surprise. Children's play.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
04:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unnecessary image replacement by
suspected sockpuppets of
Alex Neman.
182.30.204.161 (
talk)
05:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Resumption of vandalism after expiration of last protection.
MB
05:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The article is plagued by speculation as Éderson is in "advanced" negotiations with
Sport Club Corinthians Paulista. The deal, is, however, not done yet and some IPs are vandalizing the article.
SirEdimon (
talk)
00:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
The4lines (
talk)
02:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – (probably) one person using multiple IPs to change entries to (possibly) real people. –
Deacon Vorbis (
carbon •
videos)
04:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring by
100.6.97.221 (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS). Refuses to comment on talk page, resorts to name calling in edit summaries, and violates 3rd opinion without explanation of why. Temporary semi-protection is in order.
Puzzledvegetable
Is it teatime already?
02:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. If it is believed that their editing is disruptive following suitable warnings, report to the appropriate noticeboard (ANI/AIV/3RRN). We don't protect pages in response to single editors.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: Many newly registered users (who've barely crossed 100 edits) have been popping up and
vandalizing this page.
BawinV (
talk)
15:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Sorry but it's not vandalism. I warned the user and left a message at article talk. Ping me if problems persist.
Johnuniq (
talk)
23:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some promotional edit are taking place on this page and there is a need for temporary protection to it. Zubairu Dalhatu 20:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Subject is a professional baseball player who was charged with indecent exposure.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
01:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP continuously adding
WP:COPYVIO episode summaries.
Magitroopa (
talk)
21:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over numerous months.
DarkGlow (
talk)
15:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
23:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP Hopper adding same material without source.
[6]
[7].
Richard-of-Earth (
talk)
19:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – If not indefinite, please consider giving this page longer protection. Someone - maybe one editor, maybe more - drops in over irregular intervals and does "comedy" vandalism against Whitby, perhaps because of his profile in his world. The vandalistic entries outnumber real edits. It's a pain in the A monitoring it and fighting it off. Can it please have an indefinite or at least lengthy break from this? .
DBaK (
talk)
22:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too infrequent for semi-protection. This is what pending changes protection was made for. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: perfect, many thanks
Muboshgu best wishes
DBaK (
talk)
23:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
The4lines (
talk)
23:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
00:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of defamatory names and hate speech, mostly in
Malayalam language. Please make sure to revert anymore such changes before protecting.
2409:4073:2093:83CC:4D84:9664:C715:8D44 (
talk)
13:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. --
LuK3
(Talk)
22:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Must be something in the news or a new release: multiple IP vandalisms over past two days.
Ifnord (
talk)
22:36, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. CaradhrasAiguo (
leave language)
18:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined One move and you didn't even bother to warn the user.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
19:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – constant edit warring by ips.
Atlantic306 (
talk)
19:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – This page is going to be a magnet for vandals pretty much forever just due to the topic's nature, and you can already see it's getting hit by vandals all the time and has already been semid twice. I do think that there are a lot of unregistered users who would want to contribute constructively, though, so I think PC would be a good compromise.
Nathan2055
talk -
contribs
20:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much ongoing disruption for pending changes to be effective at this time.
El_C
20:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Reduction to Semi-Protection:If the outbreak is not on 30/500 protection,why should this?
2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:AC (
talk)
18:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Ping
Ymblanter.
El_C
19:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done, I think there was disruption going on which involved autoconfirmed users, but it was two weeks ago, and I reduced back to semi now. The article remains semi-protected for one more week.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:40, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
BRADFORD
talk
16:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Looks like it's mostly one IP. We don't generally protect pages in those situations. I have issued a warning.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Addition of unreliably-sourced content by IPs.
The Grand Delusion(
Send a message)
19:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
19:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Race is today, and only edits are from (so far, three) livestream spammers.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk)
19:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
19:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism and LTA disruption. --
LuK3
(Talk)
16:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bongwarrior.
El_C
16:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same reasons as
Kempegowda International Airport. Addition of improperly sourced/dubious content by various IPs. —
LeoFrank
Talk
16:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptions.
Jingiby (
talk)
17:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated minor vandalism to the article.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
13:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – The page belonging to a famous cricketer, henceforth many anonymous IPs make disruptive edits to this article. So, I request for an indefinite ECP for this article.
Sony R (
talk)
14:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Some IPs changing template redirect. --
LuK3
(Talk)
14:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
El_C
15:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring. I propose PC2 because the last few weeks it's been like this.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
15:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from a few IPs. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: protection edit conflict!
El_C
15:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we indeed conflicted and I have given a year since the previous protection was 3 months, and disruption resumed same day it expired. Feel free to shorten back to 3 months--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Ymblanter , I'm good with your duration. Thanks, though.
El_C
15:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Alivardi (
talk)
15:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
07:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed. —
Amakuru (
talk)
08:05, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Protect this page indefinitely. There is constant vandalism present. It has been protected twice before temporarily but still no avail.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
11:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
This page needs to be protected. IP vandalism has quickly resumed on the page since the previous request.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
11:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of improperly sourced content, ie, regarding the new flight to Seattle by American Airlines where no firm date is announced by the carrier. —
LeoFrank
Talk
13:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
SangrurUser (
talk)
06:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much ongoing (daily) disruption for pending changes.
El_C
08:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
07:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed.
Ə
XPLICIT
07:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article was deleted
here as a fork from
Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan. A discussion followed on the talk page of that article with which the original author of this page disagreed. The page was then recreated by its author including some copy vio material and who persists in recreating it despite lack of consensus.
Velella
Velella Talk
09:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note:
Velella, this is a confirmed user, so semi would have no effect.
Partial block may be an option. But let's see if they take you up on your draft suggestion first.
Spasiba5, what do you say?
El_C
09:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving... Draft created. We're good.
El_C
09:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Gabe1972 (
talk)
04:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Comment: By multiple users, quite fast. Right now it is multiple times per minute.
Tridwoxi (
talk) (
contribs)
01:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 04:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Has slowed down a bit
Tridwoxi (
talk) (
contribs)
01:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 04:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection ongoing vandalism, similar to garbage edits being made to
Derrick Jones Jr. and
Aaron Gordon. Any administrator who locks this page without also clearing out the rampant vandalism is committing malpractice.
2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:58DD:46B7:35C0:E0C1 (
talk)
04:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection consistent vandalism from IP, two previous temporary semi-protection periods were imposed but the vandalism continued once they lifted.
gentlecollapse6 (
talk)
04:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Sro23.
El_C
04:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Sro23.
El_C
04:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Sro23.
El_C
04:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Multiple pages
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent revertion by
suspected sockpuppets of
Alex Neman.
182.30.204.161 (
talk)
02:41, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – At least 24 hours semi due to Nate's attacks.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Widr.
El_C
04:45, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Every other edit is just this one guy insulting someone. It's the same vandalism, but from different IPs.
LanHikari64 (
talk)
03:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Izno.
El_C
04:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
TM
03:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism of BLP.
NedFausa (
talk)
04:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing without using the talk page. This has been going on for a month and the semi-protection stopped IP editing, but it's clear that the user has created an account to continue making disruptive edits. All three articles are currently semi-protected, but now need extended-confirmed protection to cease further disruptive edits.
Drovethrughosts (
talk)
20:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined We don't protect pages to deal with a single editor. If their behavior is disruptive and they have been sufficiently warned, report them to the appropriate noticeboard (ANI/AIV/3RRN).
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection:
It is a modern event killing hundreds a day,and needs more protection — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2600:387:5:805::1e (
talk)
21:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Not enough disruption to justify elevating the current protection level. Multiple experienced editors including at least one admin are involved with the article. If things get out of hand I am confidant that one or more will raise the alarm.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant disruptive and promotional editing by subject.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
22:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by User
User talk:Vnkd.
1) Here
[8]
2) Here
[9]
3) Here
[10]
He was blocked for some 48 hours some days ago for disruptive editing, he keep doing the same.
Mr.User200 (
talk)
22:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:05, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
BangJan1999
02:31, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
BangJan1999: The user has been indefinitely blocked by another admin. Repost if any further problems.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There was also an IP.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
WP:DENY.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
02:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
02:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from an SPA (now blocked) and now from an IP who is obviously them.
Crossroads
-talk-
20:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism due to Houston Astros sign-stealing scandal.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
23:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Muboshgu.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Continuing changes (false, contradictory, and/or somewhat incoherent) by IP-jumping sock of
User:Drewpalazzolo, editing both here and at articles on Australian TV channels.
Largoplazo (
talk)
00:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
El C. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
01:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This article has gotten to a high enough quality (mostly due to my extensive edits based on the completely reliable sources) and now some IP vandalism is persistently taking place because somebody tries to rewrite some things their way without providing any references. These IP addresses constantly changes, however the edits are the same, so they are clearly performed by the same person. He simply ignored what I tried to tell him and continues edits war. Furthermore, I think this article is of a high importance to gain constant protection like
Lithuania because Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania, which is member of the European Union, and 1000+ people reads this article everyday, so random edits and IP vandalism shouldn't be possible. I would suggest allowing only the registered Wikipedia users with some experience to make edits in this article content. --
Pofka (
talk)
19:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Always has issues when unprotected.
Erik (
ここで私と話してください)
20:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
20:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Resumption of recurring problematic editing (see
[11]. This is a recurring issue dating back to 2018. An IP hopping editor with a Telecom Italia IP address shows up from time to time and starts deleting sourced financial information from film articles. It has reached obsessive levels on the "Pirates of the Caribbean" articles. I really think we need to consider a permanent solution because the editor simply isn't going away.
Here is a (non-exhaustive) list of some of the previous IP addresses:
.
Betty Logan (
talk)
20:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP adding
WP:GAMECRUFT to article.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
18:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Brojam (
talk)
20:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
NASCARfan0548
↗
20:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
20:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Steven (Editor) (
talk)
21:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. User isn't extended confirmed yet.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pro wrestling titles
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It's the same problem I had with the Shine Championship, AEW Women's World Championship or the WWE Intercontinental Championship. An IP makes the same edition, removing usefull templates from the aricles. I tried to talk with him, but he never answers. Once the article is protected, he changes the target and now, it's vandalicing this articles --
HHH Pedrigree (
talk)
13:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk)
14:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: What had been a single IP edit-warring to insert a certain image has now started involving other IPs. I originally acted editorially, so want someone who's not INVOLVED.
DMacks (
talk)
14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on the current TFA.
Noah
Talk
20:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
18:31, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
19:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: protection edit conflict!
El_C
19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
The Good Place,
List of The Good Place episodes and
The Good Place (season 4) have all had to been semi-protected to prevent persistent disruptive editing from IPs. Protection on
The Good Place has expired, and the editing resumed; please protect for a longer duration.
Drovethrughosts (
talk)
13:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
17:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – I think a few days (max. a week) will be enough to convince the IP/new account that discussing his removals on the talk page is the better way. Coming close to an editwar now.
The Banner
talk
13:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month. The IP has been
warring against the usage of
Tadeusz Piotrowski's book, "
Poland's Holocaust", as a source. Those who are concerned about the quality of Piotrowski's book might consider adding material to
Piotrowski's own Wikipedia article. Surely there have been reviews of his work in scholarly journals.
EdJohnston (
talk)
20:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: spammers are adding promotional content and removing well sourced information. Please check history.
DMySon
11:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
12:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page is having problems with IP address editors re-adding promotional content to this barely notable corporate stub. Thanks! .
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
14:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lots of that article's content could use pruning as SYNTH and self-sourced.
DMacks (
talk)
15:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks, I will prune again. Last time I pruned it was immediately added back
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
15:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Jtbobwaysf: Always glad to help. Feel free to ask for more protection, or COI/spam/DE blocks as necessary.
DMacks (
talk)
16:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Tolly
4
bolly
14:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
DMacks (
talk)
15:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Change to extended confirmed or semi-protection and extend protection time : Persistent
vandalism/
disruptive editing constantly which is being accepted as stable version!?.
1
Regice2020 (
talk)
07:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
hueman1
(talk)
09:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
09:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: The amount of IP edits on the page vandalizing it is insane. The page should be protected for at least a week since the awards are tomorrow.
JE98 (
talk)
12:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
12:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Still constantly being confused with the similarly named
Kabaddi World Cup (Circle style) which Pakistan won. New users are still incorrectly editing that information onto here. Autoconfirmed doesn't seem to be working here, semi is required at least for the time being. Semi protection is probably also required for
Kabaddi World Cup (Circle style) with much disruptive and vandal editing by new users. Should fall under
WP:ARBIPA.
Gotitbro (
talk)
11:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston.
El_C
12:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent random disruptive warrant for protection all started when Wired article was released about this page.
Regice2020 (
talk)
20:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Let's keep the article talk page as open as humanly possible.
El_C
03:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing by IPs. The article is being confused with
Kabaddi World Cup (Circle style) which Pakistan recently won and that information being incorrectly inserted here. The IKF holds the
Kabaddi World Cup (Standard style) not circle. Should fall under
WP:ARBIPA. Both the Kabaddi World Cup articles were protected for the same reason.
Gotitbro (
talk)
05:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Tolly
4
bolly
06:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism .
Krimuk2.0 (
talk)
07:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Page has been persistently vandalised for several.months by IP's for some unknown reason. Edits are purely disruptive.
Koncorde (
talk)
02:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Already pending changes protected.
El_C
03:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: high level of IP vandalism. Such a thing is expected continue as its a current event.
Dey subrata (
talk)
20:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Question: can you cite a few
diffs of these vandalism edits?
El_C
20:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
El_C Here-
1,
2.
Dey subrata (
talk)
05:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
05:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. Persistent
disruptive editing.
Donnowin1 (
talk)
03:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
05:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to birth date. I'm requesting six months of protection as the birth year is vandalized 1-2 times per week, and has been since I created the page nearly a year ago.
Citrivescence (
talk)
03:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
05:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism; disruptive edits from several accounts, apparently by the subject. A user block that sticks would be good.
2601:188:180:B8E0:9587:6555:466B:361D (
talk)
04:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
05:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – very few constructive ip edits, occasional target of vandalism due to subject matter, previously protected.
Will120 (
talk)
20:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
El_C
03:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending change protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edited by sockpuppets of It's_gonna_be_awesome and IP users--
Wolfch (
talk)
23:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Increase page protection to Extended Confirmed Protection The increase protection would allow editors to keep it under control the content more easily. Semi-Protection has proven ineffective does not seem addressing disinformation and blind editing from randoms (ever since Wired Article released about this page) on this page.
1
2
3
4
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. – See
Ad Orientem's decline on 16 February.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing by IPs. The article is being confused with the similarly named
Kabaddi World Cup (Circle style) which Pakistan recently won and that information being incorrectly inserted here. Should fall under
WP:ARBIPA.
Gotitbro (
talk)
22:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Clarify: Partial block on a single article which I have no interest in editing further. Nothing to do with this.
Gotitbro (
talk)
23:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Affected by vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts due to a recently concluded World Cup.
Gotitbro (
talk)
23:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes:
BLP policy violations – infrequent target of ip vandalism related to us president, was previously semiprotected for one year.
Will120 (
talk)
23:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
funplussmart (
talk)
00:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP edit warring.
SolarFlash
Discussion
01:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short term new editor/IP vandalism. Looks like it has ramped up the past few days. --
LuK3
(Talk)
00:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
General Ization
Talk
02:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There is and will be some persistent IP vandalism due to her performance of the Star Spangled Banner at the NBA All Star game which is currently in progress.
Bait30
Talk?
03:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: One anonymous persistant vandal keeps adding a defamatory and misleading edit. Page was semi-protected for a month in late 2017, but vandal returned and defamatory info was up for a year, potentially harming subject's career. Request semi-protection for longer period, indefinite if possible.
Calvinash (
talk)
21:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – This page was protected for BLP violations on February 5 for 3 days, after which the same BLP violations (changing the birth year again and again) continued. As most of these edits are done by different IPs, I suggest semi-protecting the page again.
AntiCedros (
talk)
22:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry –
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brunodam.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
22:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – Indef due to long-term sockpuppetry.
EdJohnston (
talk)
00:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – Some editors are adding the names of the accused suspects of the crime in violation of BLPCRIME.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
23:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
23:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent defamation - Users repeatedly remove sourced articles and change them to negative and incorrect articles that are extremely defaming to the subject. I have removed outdated and incorrect information from the page and they (Sam Sailor and IP address) keep adding it back.
Labamba64 (
talk)
09:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
18:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and adding unrelated TV shows.
TheFallenPower (
talk)
18:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
16:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The section that the various IPs and new accounts are challenging needs some work, but not to the point of repeatedly deleting it.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Brojam (
talk)
16:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It will revert to pending changes protection but there is no template for that.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite move protection: Occasional but regular move attempts to "Kyiv Metro" without discussion (even by veteran admin
User:JzG recently) for the past decade, ignoring the highly political nature of any move from "Kiev" to "Kyiv". --
Sameboat - 同舟 (
talk ·
contri.)
02:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Sameboat - 同舟: Is there a link to a discussion showing a strong consensus for the current title? I just had a quick skim of talk and archives and cannot see anything. If not, move protection would have to be declined. Perhaps there is a discussion about
Kiev?
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq:
This is the link. The name is not a trademark, hence the article can only be renamed if the article on the city is renamed.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ymblanter: Thanks but I would like to see a link to the actual moratorium discussion. That notice at the top of
Talk:Kiev (at the bottom of the talk header) includes "may be read here and here" but the two here links are broken and a quick search of the archives does not find them. I'm not in the mood to dig more at the moment but if this is still here much later I'll look again, fix the links at Talk:Kiev and indefinitely move protect
Kiev Metro with an edit summary pointing to the moratorium.
Johnuniq (
talk)
08:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Johnuniq, the lead spelled it Kyiv, so was at odds witht he article title, so I moved it. That's the preferred transliteration now. Kiev is preferred by Russians, Kyiv by Ukrainians. Kiev was prefrerred by the previous pro-Russian regime, but, as we heard in testimony before Congress, Kyiv is what's currently in use by diplomats (who are careful about such things).
This explains it well. See also
Pune,
Kolkata,
Mumbai. Transliterations with overtones of imperial occupation are not popular these days.
Guy (
help!)
08:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I am sorry to mention this again but explicit concensus resulting from an rfc was that the current spelling is Kiev. I will post here a ref when I am back to my computer.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: @
JzG:
This is the discussion--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Ymblanter, le sigh, classic Wikipedia: much digging in of heels.
- The BBC changed in May 2019. WaPo appears to have changed last year too (though their search is rather borked). NYT as well. And The Times. FT changed in September last. Ukraine embassy and tourist board both use Kyiv. I'm struggling to find any mainstream source in English that still uses Kiev.
- Regardless, I moved it because the lead spelled it Kyiv, which did not surprise me as I am well aware that the Russian transliteration is no longer preferred, especially given the ongoing invasion.
- I note in passing that it's also easy to find sources that call the country "The Ukraine", also considered a Russian imperialist imposition. Thankfully we don't do that.
Guy (
help!)
15:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I try to keep a low profile here, because whatever happens I always get accused in being a Russian imperialist, solely on the basis of what my mothertongue is (and actually get such accusations on a weekly basis), but these arguments indeed were considered at the RfC, mainly by the native English speakers, and did not get a majority.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Move protected pending a formal move request. This is not the place to have that discussion and the page should not be moved again until such a discussion occurs.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Multiple pages
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by
suspected sockpuppets of
Alex Neman.
180.244.231.134 (
talk)
15:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Interstellarity (
talk)
17:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 18 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – To prevent non-registered editors adding a little-recognised "name" that appears to have been registered with a galaxy "naming" commercial website.
TowardsTheLight (
talk)
12:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of unsourced information about a bio of a living person.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
13:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. It's always the same IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi protection: High level of vandalism by new users and ips.
Dey subrata (
talk)
15:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Appears to be due to his whistleblowing that caused his coach to resign for racist behaviour.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
16:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced, poorly sourced, and outright incorrect information.
creffett (
talk)
23:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP user repeatedly removes sourced category from article. .
TJMSmith (
talk)
03:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
TJMSmith: Sorry but it looks like a content disagreement rather than
vandalism. The talk page has had no substantive edit since 2011. If there is a discussion somewhere showing that
Category:American male deaf actors should apply, please link to it in a new section on article talk and try to engage the IP in discussion about the issue. I know the article says he was born deaf and is an actor, but if it's so clear, there should be a discussion with an explanation before long-term protection.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism after Lionel Messi won an award, due to rivalry with Cristiano Ronaldo fans
Per89 (
talk)
10:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Crash in Daytona leading to unconfirmed death reports.
Koldcuts (
talk)
01:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
02:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
FlightTime, the only edit to this IP user talk page is yours though... –
Muboshgu (
talk)
03:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Muboshgu: I meant to request this page. Brain fart :P, Sorry -
FlightTime (
open channel)
03:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
FlightTime, happens to the best brains. I was alerting you to yours. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
04:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent Disruption.
ML
911
03:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued vandalism due to
Houston Astros sign stealing scandal.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
03:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
KyleJoan
talk
05:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
05:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalized several times in the last few days.
Flix11 (
talk)
22:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalized a few times in past hours.
Flix11 (
talk)
23:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued issue with neo-nazi related content being added, only this time by a newly-autoconfirmed account. Had no luck with reporting it, so I feel a further protection increase is the best option.
Alivardi (
talk)
23:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extending protection, this is a long-term problem.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated disrupted edits from various new and IP editors - named accounts can be handled by blocks if they continue, but need semi to deal with the repeated IP edits.
Ravensfire (
talk)
02:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Article has been the target of POV-pushing IP editors over the past week or so. –
Skywatcher68 (
talk)
02:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing; long term and persistent attempts to appropriate the article on behalf of a different TV station.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
03:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Article has been the target of POV-pushing IP editors over the past week or so.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Have you discussed this with the other editor?
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. Again has you discussed this?
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: User making constant attempts to add
unsourced information regarding
unconfirmed future event.
SolarFlash
Discussion
19:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
NASCARfan0548
↗
19:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked:
MetalDiablo666 (
talk ·
contribs). blocked from that page.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of
unsourced and/or poorly sourced content to article by anonymous editors.
livelikemusic
talk!
14:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes.
Mazewaxie (
talk •
contribs)
14:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes.
Mazewaxie (
talk •
contribs)
14:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection.
Mazewaxie (
talk •
contribs)
14:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – consistent unsourced editing by timwikisidemen and his socks.
Groiglery1217 (
talk)
14:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
Dey subrata (
talk)
15:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Constant lineage changes to this article and all
AC/DC member's pages. IP's keep changing "Australian" to "Scottish" which is not true. This is an ongoing problem (as I said, with all band member's pages). Maybe a RfC to gain consensus to perm semi all member's pages, IDK but this is getting very old and most disruptive. Please ping me with comments. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
16:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Move protection: Unlikely the page will need to be renamed, preventative. —
Locke Cole •
t •
c
17:19, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Primefac. I would have declined, personally, there's no indication whatsoever that protection is necessary.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
20:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued vandalism, "spoilers" for unaired season, etc. --
Another Believer (
Talk)
21:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
21:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Steady trickle of IP vandalism and BLP issues.
Grayfell (
talk)
01:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GAB
gab
01:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Again. continued vandalism. Doesn't look like it's going to stop any time soon.
LanHikari64 (
talk)
19:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
20:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This festival is the day after tomorrow. Many people are doing promotional edits on this page.
Lightbluerain (
talk)
20:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
20:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for years (when there isn't the protection), also pages like
List of most-disliked YouTube videos,
List of most-subscribed YouTube channels and
List of most-viewed online videos in the first 24 hours have an indefinitive protection for persistent vandalism, please also watch the protection log
of the page, last protection lasted 1 year--
Luke Stark 96 (
talk)
12:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I'm sorry but I disagree with only two days protection, I think it isn't enough, we have five vandalism in four days and the last protection lasted 1 year, and why the other pages have the indefinitive protection?--
Luke Stark 96 (
talk)
14:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Deepfriedokra. Deepfriedokra seems to like protecting the page for 2 days (11-13 December 2018 and now 19-21 February 2020), for some reason! I, however, am inclined to protect it indefinitely as a perennial problem — but we can go through the motions of letting the 2-day protection expire, sure.
El_C
19:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Binksternet (
talk)
18:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – most edits since protection expired have been disruptive/reverts due to being world series losers vs sign stealing teams.
Will120 (
talk)
18:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
19:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content following move to another club.
Vaselineeeeeeee
★★★
14:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --
Wikibenboy94 (
talk)
15:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP editors frequently and disruptively edit out that the game has been delayed beyond its previously intended release date of March 6, 2020.
IceWelder [
✉]
16:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Plandu (
talk)
16:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Widr (
talk)
18:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of
WP:RSBREAKING content. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
16:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of
WP:RSBREAKING content. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
16:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated main infobox image change by suspected IPs of
Kingtuh, which insisted to use his/her
own image without prior discussion and refusal to discuss.
180.244.231.134 (
talk)
16:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Speculation re "imminent" transfer.
Dirkbb (
talk)
17:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Already reached out to protecting admin about this - it makes no sense that an article is fully protected indefinitely. I think extended confirmed protection would be better for this case.
A
a
s
i
m
02:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
[12]
A
a
s
i
m
02:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
04:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
El_C
19:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite Pending Changes: High level of IP vandalism and edit war. —
Sarvatra (
talk,
contribs)
13:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent repetitive vandalism by an editor using three different IP addresses.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk)
13:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent developments resulting in multiple back-and-forth edits of unsourced/ unverified content.
PenulisHantu (
talk)
14:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: After her unfortunate demise, her wiki page is currently at an editing war due to her possible year of birth of either 1932, 1938, or 1945. I think her page should be semi-protected until the conflict is settled.
MsScorpioMoon (
talk)
14:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I agree with this, even though it would mean I myself couldn't edit. The amount of newbie anon-IPs at this article who don't understand
WP:RS is creating great difficulties. --
65.78.8.103 (
talk)
14:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although now we have all three years in the lede....
Lectonar (
talk)
14:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Robbery
Talk
Edits
01:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. No edits in over a week is not persistent.
CambridgeBayWeather,
UQAT (talk),
Sunasuttuq
04:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – It's a school article, so it constantly gets vandalized. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖
04:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
UQAT (talk),
Sunasuttuq
04:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk)
04:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple IPs inserting nonsense into roster. e.g.
[13], or "Joe from IT"
[14]. All of this content on living persons is without sources and some of it is implausible.
Eostrix (
talk)
09:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequently subject to short term protection in recent years (& currently under it until March 15), but nature of sign stealing scandal still under investigation makes it a waiting target for vandalism when protection expires in less than a month, in fact most recent edit was revert of an autoconfirmed user inserting vandalism related to aforementioned sign stealing.
Will120 (
talk)
05:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not done "Indefinite" is too strong at this point. I'm watching the page. We'll see how things are going in mid-March. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
05:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – all infrequent edits since semi protection expired have been vandalism/removal of edits regarding astros sign stealing.
Will120 (
talk)
05:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. "All" of two vandalism edits. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
05:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – every IP edit since semi protection expired has been reverted, frequently subject to projection ever since he has been a regular in the yankees lineup.
Will120 (
talk)
08:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
08:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
{ [ ( jjj
1238 ) ] }
08:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
08:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute and edit warring. The IP-user refuses to use talk page and calls my reverts (restoring accepted revision) "vandalism". Their new content and cited source is not reliable and look random in my opinion. Per
WP:BURDEN, they should prove it on talk page. Since the IP user is not interested in collaboration, maybe protecting this article convinces them to use talk page and discuss their edits.
Wario-Man (
talk)
08:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – all ip edits since recent semiprotection expired vandalism, long protection log.
Will120 (
talk)
05:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Too low in frequency; pending-changes protection is enough.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Lectonar: We have protection-conflicted. Please change my one month if wanted.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- All is well :).
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long history of vandalism/protection, target of school based-vandalism.
Will120 (
talk)
05:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if pending changes protection does the trick.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continuous IP vandalism.
WanderingWanda (
talk)
06:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
07:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Editing War - Persistent editing between me and a anonymous user over a NY1 source not being a reliable source for a update as it was the only source for it. I had to revert it some many times after being reverted for not being "reliable".
A.R.M. (
talk)
15:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
ARMcgrath:I endorse this request but will comment that this needs full protection due to both named accounts and IP users edit warring.
epicgenius (
talk)
20:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Epicgenius: I do like to apologize for that. Sometimes third party source are the best source cause there’s none to offer I have reported the Anonymous user. (I’m not sure if blocking both of us helps) but I’ll stop with the edit war editing.
A.R.M. (
talk)
20:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
::
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Work it out on the talk page.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
@
MelanieN: We did before the page was fully protected.
A.R.M. (
talk)
23:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- OK, if that settles it, I will remove the protection. --
MelanieN (
talk)
00:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined For the bot.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – In the national news due to child sexual abuse allegations. .
Stuartyeates (
talk)
02:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
04:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – IPs adding unconfirmed death rumors.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk)
03:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
BigrTex: You indefinitely move-protected the article. Did you mean to do that?
Johnuniq (
talk)
04:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Should we place a redirect to
List of Girl Meets World characters#Farkle Minkus?.
Ni3Xposite (
talk)
23:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Ping
Sandstein.
El_C
04:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- With respect to Sandstein and El C, this page should not have been deleted in the first place, it is one where one of RHaworth's too-fast speedy deletions has caused confusion. I have restored the redirect which was created since the 2014 deletion discussion and existed for five years; the last time it was overwritten with an article it should have been reverted to a redirect rather than the page deleted. The redirect is extended-confirmed protected indefinitely so as to enforce the previous
creation protection. If any of the admins disagree with this action then feel free to do what you think is best.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
23:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
04:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High amount of vandalism from IP and non-autoconfirmed editors. This article recently had protection expire.
Tdc42 (
talk)
22:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent death and the article appears to be a focal point. Protect for a month please.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
22:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ip address continuously adding
WP:SYNTH which is considered to be
WP:OR. —
YoungForever
(talk)
22:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
John from Idegon (
talk)
23:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Over half of the recent edits are either vandalism or reverts. Looks to be something political.
dibbydib
💬/
✏
23:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: On-going IP vandalism for nearly three weeks.
BabelStone (
talk)
18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Individual was just pardoned today, was a frequent subject of POV edit-warring beforehand. Prior periodic edits were highlighting or deleting his felony conviction, but lots of edits today and to be expected for this week, will probably die down after a few days.
JesseRafe (
talk)
20:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection looks like it will mostly handle the problem.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Can we consider changing from pc1 to perm semi, as busy as this article is, there's very little difference between reverting open editing and reviewing pending changes, just asking (it would make things a lot easier). Last protecting
NeilN is inactive. Please ping me with comments {{re|FlightTime}}
. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
21:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Or would a RfC be in order ? -
FlightTime (
open channel)
22:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. I agree, the article is way too actively edited for PC to work well, and the vandalism is continuous. A Featured Article deserves better.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Article is currently the target of a very active IP-hopping POV-pusher who has been reporting reverts as
vandalism. –
Skywatcher68 (
talk)
21:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It is you the problem. You try to prevent me adding source, remove promotional content, etc. Please respect the rules of Wikipedia.
92.184.97.3 (
talk)
21:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
TheSandDoctor.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Everedux
(talk)
22:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Oshwah.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: User Request within Userspace.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
16:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined As it stands, your "humorous" essay is confusing and possibly offensive to new users. I do not see any good reason to protect it from a good-faith
WP:U5 nomination at this time.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – persistent BLP violations since February 15.
AntiCedros (
talk)
17:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Vandalism has restarted everytime after the protection has expired.
Brojam (
talk)
17:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – recent persistent vandalism after last protection expired.
Karl 334
Talk-
-Contribs
18:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Protection log goes back years.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Marcel Adams
Indefinite pending change protection: Intermittent vandalism and malicous editing since December 2019 about the page of a living person.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. This problem goes back more than a year and the BLP violations are serious. It may be necessary at times to impose semi-protection in addition to the PC.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There's practically no constructive edits by non-autoconfirmed users. Also pinging the PC protector
Samsara.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
18:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's stop the waring and get all to the talk page.....yes one editor is at 5 reverts .....but best to get the on the talk page over a block. Don't care what version is protect. ....just need time for editor to understand the problems.
Moxy 🍁
21:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: this page is a frequent target of disruptive editing and addition of unsourced information by unregistered ips. Most recently a user with a dynamic ip range is trying to cause an edit war issue. Page protection for at least a week might help things.
Dilbaggg (
talk)
21:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Many IP users edit content in nationalistic ways, usually to remove content mentioning cultural influence by Muslims.
puggo (
talk)
15:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP editors adding nonsense material, changing names, etc.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
15:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Let us know if that doesn't help.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Well-known NFL player, currently in ITN legal trouble. Please semi-protect for the rest of the week. --
bender235 (
talk)
19:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Recent uptake of vandalism on a controversial article. A period of semi-protection might be in order.
Midnightblueowl (
talk)
19:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
WP:BLP and
WP:V violation and sock puppetry. Anonymous IP hoppers have been constantly changing or adding the birth date and place for many months (e.g.
[15]) without any explanation and without citing any
reliable source, ignoring all requests and warnings. Page protection seems to be the only reasonable option—the user keeps changing their IP address with almost every edit and makes it clear they will not stop.—
J. M. (
talk)
19:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Ongoing edit warring. -
Bilby (
talk)
06:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now. The two editors involved have been idle for half a day. I've warned them both, and I will keep an eye on the page for a bit.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection. Persistent edit warring by various IPs.
LibStar (
talk)
13:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Dq209 (
talk)
16:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. There is some activity about linking common names concerning over MOS:OVERLINK.
Tainted-wingsz (
talk)
18:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism.
AshMusique (
talk)
06:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection would be overkill here, the vandalism is all anons.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
11:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This was one user with several accounts, semiprotection is better.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Severe vandalism over the last few days.
Java
Hurricane
14:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IPs.
S. M. Nazmus Shakib (
talk)
15:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent spamming by IP editors and new editors.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk)
13:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: I don't like indefinite protection. Leads to problems later.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from various IP addresses.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
12:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection. This article has neverending problems with trivial vandalism on a daily basis from people who think it's funny because of a joke in Bojack Horseman ages ago and it's really tiring for editors to have to watch every edit to the article from IP addresses and new users in the extremely likely prospect that they're more vandalism.
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
12:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not big enough to warrant semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Long term edit warring by IPs (probable socks of
User:Swissair123 /
User:EGCC123). Trying to insert info into the lead of
Manchester, but using unreliable sources for it, ranging from
blogs to (now) sources which are about Glasgow and contradict the point they try to make
[16]. This was noted at the talk page (
Talk:Manchester#Recent changes to the lead section), but not replied to, and gets blindly reinserted. Discussion is happening at
Talk:Birmingham#Discussion happening in the article for Manchester. IP edits are getting more heated as well (edit summaries in full caps, heated statements like "Wikipedia Editors, is this your way of forcing through your own agendas and pretending to not have a bias to the general public? If it is, then that is shameful."), but so far not blockworthy (if they aren't a sock that is). Semi-protecting the articles (probably best to semi-protect
Birmingham as well, edit war going on there too, with the IP removing sourced statements
[17]). More discussion and less article editing is needed here.
Fram (
talk)
10:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: I have a hard time AGF when a cited reference is about Glasgow and is being used to support content about Manchester. I gave the IP a warning, as they have needed one.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – vandalism from multiple users.
Jeb3
Talk at me here
What I've Done
13:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: relatively narrow corporate range
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism.
TJRC (
talk)
00:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Seems to have died down. Please relist if it picks up.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism, IP hopper.
Horse Eye Jack (
talk)
01:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Same IP during the last days.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
122.52.149.141 (
talk)
07:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued vandalism.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk)
08:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism.
Krimuk2.0 (
talk)
09:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Is it possible to temporarily increase the protection on my userpage? I seem to have attracted some unwanted attention from another editor.
JuneGloom07
Talk
04:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:19, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Brojam (
talk)
05:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism and disruptive editing from multiple IP accounts. Previous temporary blocks have not solved the issue. .
Plandu (
talk)
05:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Her recent inflammatory statements have garnered a fair amount of IP vandalism.
CarbonX (
talk)
21:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High-visibility page with frequent vandalism and test edits.
2002:48D1:3C5F:0:AC20:B76D:116A:667B (
talk)
22:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, caused by high follower count Twitter account.
Museeeic (
talk)
01:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – It appears that the disruptive editing did not subside since the previous protection period.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
13:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC).
reply
Note: It's low intensity, so let's see if we can filter out the bad and keep the good. --
Deep
fried
okra
13:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protection: IPs who don't know how Wikipedia works keep adding unsourced original research about this upcoming film.
⌚️ (
talk)
19:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. @
Trillfendi: I've warned you before about
failing to assume good faith and
personal attacks in your requests here. This will be the last warning.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
20:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Per
WP:UPROT. .
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
19:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
20:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Match indef semi protection to the
original film and
its musical.
Carl Tristan Orense
03:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
06:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – there has been a notable amount of vandalism recently, so maybe we should just protect this article for a bit so the vandals go away.
🜚 Yatagarasu 🜚
03:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I do not see that much vandalism, I see a little bit of back and forth between autoconfirmed users.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP hopping attempting to remove collapsed content of off-topic discussion about conduct rather than content. -- /
Alex/
21
13:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined -- edits are not vandalism. —
Kusma (
t·
c)
13:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Homophobic schoolboy bullying being repeatedly inserted by new throwaway/sock accounts. Please also consider revdel (or more) and other measures. Thanks.
Julietdeltalima
(talk)
21:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated insertion of poorly written controversial statements. Just want the IP's obviously associated with the school to talk about it .
John from Idegon (
talk)
00:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. I've partially-blocked the IP range
165.225.0.64/27 from being able to edit this article for 6 months.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
String of ips with big unreferenced changes to data, (which is correct & referenced), starting with
this on 12 February - string of ip addresses.
Johnbod (
talk)
02:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Note: as of now is at the bad version.
Johnbod (
talk)
05:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:38, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Largoplazo (
talk)
06:38, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected
Lectonar (
talk)
06:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP editors keep adding a plot section in, despite the film not releasing until 2 April.
Mclarenfan17 (
talk)
22:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Getting a bit of a hammering from IP vandals at the moment. .
DBaK (
talk)
23:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. This is going to be a problem for a while. I'd recommend setting this article with pending changes because the controversy involving this individual is only going to intensify as baseball season begins.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk)
00:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:02, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing in recent weeks, in the month of February.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk)
00:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Heavy vandalism on this page over past two days, particularly on
Bill Burr's role.
KNHaw
(talk)
00:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ip users are keep vandalizing the article. The article needs to be semi-protected to keep out these users. Thank you. .
Jeff6045 (
talk)
01:02, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism, was about once a week, now once a day; a month or so semi-protect would probably do the trick.
TJRC (
talk)
01:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by autocomfirmed users semi protection not stoping the sockpuppetry.
Dq209 (
talk)
19:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Massive
WP:EW has been going on, the user that caused it is now blocked for two months, but please protect this page to let everything cool-down a bit. --
Koreanovsky (
talk)
20:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined Editors already blocked, no need.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent vandalism due to appearing in UK-UE politics.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
21:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, not the first time for this page I believe. .
QueerFilmNerd
talk
22:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – This sock continually trying to reinsert information, despite never engaging in talk. It is like whackamole trying to report all his socks and ever changing IPs (all geolocated to the same place though).
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Geronikolakis
Some sample edits:
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21].
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk)
14:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Can I poke this please. Sock puppetry at this page is getting silly now. The has had two socks banned today and just created one more, and continues to edit with IPs. Thanks. --
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk)
19:15, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk)
14:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs keep adding copyrighted content into the article, even after warning.
Alex Tenshi (
talk)
16:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Disruptive editing by anonymous users; I see that this page has been protected a lot in the past but the vandalism never ceased.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
17:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly and
tendentiously re-created by
single-purpose accounts using various forms of the name, such as
Ntinda Vocational Training Institute and
Ntinda Vocational Training Institution, to
game the system. Request either admin or ECP protection to prevent re-creation by throw-away accounts.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
17:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done
kingboyk (
talk)
20:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Ionmars10 (
talk)
18:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recently refereed a contentious football match, it looks like. Lots of POV incoming.
Plandu (
talk)
18:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant vandalism today from multiple (at least 3 or 4) IP users. .
MusicalKnight (
talk)
19:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
22:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – 3 separate IPs adding defamatory content to football ref.
Chuka Chief (
talk)
20:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk)
21:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
22:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. —
Eyer (If you
reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}}
to your message to
let me know.)
22:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
Alex Neman sockpuppet edits.
180.244.231.134 (
talk)
00:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Block evasion.
4TheWynne
(talk •
contribs)
00:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A userbox converted into a redirect by an IP. Same as
User:A. Pseudonym/UBX/Trans man. —
andrybak (
talk)
09:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Constant
edit-warring by banned sock using multiple IPs to change information without adding a
reliable source. —
Angryjoe1111 (
talk)
19:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Newly expanded article already experiencing persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
03:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Ministerboy (
talk)
03:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bishonen.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
SangrurUser (
talk)
14:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – persistent promotional editing by likely undeclared paid editors.
Atlantic306 (
talk)
20:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed virtually continuous protection since 2018.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Sakiv (
talk)
21:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Already protected by a administrators. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
180.245.214.207 (
talk)
02:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
El C.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism after being protected for two days.
Museeeic (
talk)
21:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent IP vandalism/using the article as an opinion piece.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
06:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
15:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
15:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Sock IP keeps changing sourced content. - .
LouisAragon (
talk)
23:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. I've
partially blocked the
2605:E000:151E:8000:0:0:0:0/50 IP address range from editing the
Caucasian Imamate article for 6 months. Thanks for reporting this.
—
Newslinger
talk
09:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Several attempts recently to insert spam link by changing IP editors.
Constant314 (
talk)
03:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done. Since the domain was spammed on multiple articles, I
blacklisted the domain at
Special:Diff/942060951 instead of protecting the page. Thanks for reporting this.
—
Newslinger
talk
09:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
10:08, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
23:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
—
Newslinger
talk
09:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent and repeated BLP violations from IPs in Argentina. Picked right up again after previous semi protection expired. Additionally, some of the IP edits from Iranian mobile networks are likely block evasion by Its taylor36, so semi would solve multiple issues at once.
Indignant Flamingo (
talk)
09:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – It seems out of control. There are edits that need deletion right now.
Shanze1 (
talk)
09:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Almost every edit is either vandalism or reversion of vandalism.
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk)
18:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism within the article.
Mr Xaero
☎️
19:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent silly vandalisms all morning, is currently's Google's doodle and first entry points to this article. A few days protection will suffice.
Ifnord (
talk)
19:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP editorializing related to US politics. .
Grayfell (
talk)
23:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Newslinger
talk
09:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
—
Newslinger
talk
09:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: High-use template. Currently
12,683 transclusions. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
07:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected indefinitely.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long-term disruptive IP editing.
Citobun (
talk)
07:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Several different ip users and new accounts have been vandalizing the same portion of the article several times a day, changing Victoria Fuller's profession to "homewrecker" or some variation thereof. This is likely to continue as much if not more frequently leading up to the new episode on Monday.
Jake (
talk)
08:08, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent insults and blowing up of a minor incident contrary to
WP:BLP
.
The Banner
talk
18:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Looks like a team of vandals is busy. 5 times vandalised today. A time out of a day or so will be sufficient to spoil the fun.
The Banner
talk
19:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
—
Newslinger
talk
08:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Larry Hockett (
Talk)
00:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
04:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
16:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Protection recently expired, and vandalism immediately resumed.
Nymf (
talk)
17:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP(s) in a short time span.
JAH2k (
talk)
17:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Periodically this page comes under IP vandalism:
[22]. It is currently under another spate, particularly over the past two days so a term of protection seems appropriate.
AllyD (
talk) 18:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC) (Added note: curiously, looking at
the logs, this cycle appears to happen and require several months of protection in February each year.
AllyD (
talk)
19:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC))
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I wonder if the timing relates to Mardi Gras? Seems unlikely; he was New York-based, not New Orleans-based.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
14:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – We've been getting a lot of IP edits reporting his death in a car accident. He's not dead, but we could use putting the IPs off so a spot of temp semi would probably help matters.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
15:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP users are back again vandalizing the page. This seems to occur every few weeks. .
Mr Xaero
☎️
19:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Sro23.
Favonian (
talk)
20:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued vandalism.
137.97.9.67 (
talk)
17:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
17:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Full Protection: Content Dispute between confirmed users.
Mr. Awesome, PhD (
talk)
17:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Chetsford (
talk)
17:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk)
20:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Determined IP editor from Kiev keeps replacing Kiev with Kyiv.
Le Deluge (
talk)
15:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
El_C
16:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
The Grand Delusion(
Send a message)
19:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and from newly created accounts. Addition of unsourced content and puffery.
2409:4073:8B:F82E:106:B3B0:DE0C:9208 (
talk)
16:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – logged in users are adding affiliate urls (or maybe worse, i am not sure). there is a risk on crypto exchange sites that bad actors might try to steal passwords (and funds). .
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
17:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
MER-C: and
David Gerard this editor
M1h4jl0m1 is adding affiliate links (or could we worse) to
BitMEX. Obvious violation. Probably related to the earlier IP address edits that I reverted a few days earlier on BitMEX as well. There is a risk that this type of url hijacking could occur on other cryptocurrency exchange articles as well, with a low risk being simply a affiliate signup link. But a higher risk could later be a spoof website design to steal login details. Something we need to be on the lookout for. Pinging you on this RPP just as a heads up. Thanks!
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
17:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Indefinitely semi-protected the page and blocked the spammer.
MER-C
17:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
El_C
17:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, mass attack. Will likely require lots of reversion given the scope.
2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
17:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
17:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations.
Elizium23 (
talk)
07:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked:
UpWithJimmy (
talk ·
contribs). Blocked from edit that page for 48 hours.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Bobherry
Talk
Edits
15:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
16:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor persistently reverting my edit without leaving a comment on the talk page.
B2V22BHARAT (
talk)
15:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
16:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: disruptive edits from IPs and spam accounts. –
2.
O.
Boxing
04:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk)
04:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
09:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations – IP editors persistently adding BLP violating material to the lead.
Freeknowledgecreator (
talk)
13:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi should be all it needs since the people who are vandalising (using a liberal use of that term) are IPs.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
14:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP LTA vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
13:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. due to the type of vandalism it is.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
14:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Please re-initiate the protection for an extended period. The recent protection has not helped - as soon as it ended the BTS renaming crap started again. .
Eggishorn
(talk)
(contrib)
13:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection edit conflict!
El_C
14:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: PCP is not useful for persistent vandalism.
2409:4073:2081:B701:E2:B235:BF9E:2D04 (
talk)
14:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Did not take long after the protection ended for the same user to return to making bad-faith edits (including accusations of racism).
Semsurî (
talk)
14:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP keeps re-ordering the cast into something weird without any obvious reasoning.
Jorm (
talk)
00:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Jorm: It's only one IP and that IP is making other edits which should be checked. Any chance you could look at
181.230.209.229 (
talk ·
contribs) and revert unhelpful edits? I left them a warning. Please let me know if there are further unexplained adjustments and I will block.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: It's... it's pretty much all of their edits. They're not objectively vandalism but they're also objectively not improvements. I'll have to revert them all manually.--
Jorm (
talk)
01:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
02:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Run of drive-by ip and new account vandals hijacking sources, blanking cited sections.
BusterD (
talk)
02:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article has been vandalized more than 10 times in the past week, requesting temporary protection until his campaign has concluded.
JAH2k (
talk)
03:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk)
04:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Enforcement of
WP:ARBAP2. Slow disruptive editing plus given a ban went into effect recently.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
05:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Plandu (
talk)
07:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
22:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editing.
Citobun (
talk)
07:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A userbox converted into a redirect by an IP. Same as
User:A. Pseudonym/UBX/Trans woman. —
andrybak (
talk)
09:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
22:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Haveyouseenthisboy (
talk)
10:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Migsmigss (
talk)
10:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Migsmigss (
talk)
11:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
16:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to page.
livelikemusic
talk!
17:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP and puppet vandalism. In October 2019, the blocked user
User:Эльбрус Казбекович, using his sockpuppet
User:Matianian, inserted false claims
dif. Matianian was blocked ofcourse, but then he kept coming back to the page to insert the exact same paragraph over and over again. He uses different IPs, so no point of sockpuppet investigation as he always edit using new IP.
Examples:
dif 1,
dif 2,
dif 3,
dif 4, and
dif 5
The page was protected by
User:Muboshgu for a week in 27 January, but the user came back the same day the protection ended!!! So Muboshgu protected the page again for two weeks in 4 February, and again, the user came back today to insert the same text
here!!! So persistent... I hope the page can be protected for a long period since it seems that the blocked user will never give up with a week or two protection periods.--
Attar-Aram syria (
talk)
20:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. It was unprotected four days ago, and there has been one bad edit since.
Attar-Aram syria, if it does continue beyond this one edit, I'll protect it again. Ping me if it gets worse. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
22:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits based on speculations.
PenulisHantu (
talk)
00:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bit premature but I see the point.
Johnuniq (
talk)
01:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
TheNewMinistry (
talk)
06:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
22:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
00:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
00:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Vandalism and spam from IP edits. Will only get worse as the fight nears. –
2.
O.
Boxing
00:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
00:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – For some odd reason this article seems to have this problem more then others...perhaps time to just lock it up to IP's.
Moxy 🍁
00:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
00:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Off-site attention coming from a former WWE employee's twitter account following the addition of her name to this article, she tweeted a screenshot of it in jest, now fans keep adding her back.
[23].
Rain
the 1
00:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
00:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected: Semi-protected about 10 years ago by
User:PMDrive1061 who hasn't been active
since 2014 for Persistent
vandalism – I think edits by IPs should be ok. I just wanted to change "Aladdin 2..." as the alternate name to "Aladdin and the Return of Jafar" per
IMDB or "Aladdin: The Return of Jafar" per
Disney's official list as Aladdin 2 is currently being used to refer to the potential live-action sequel to the 2019 Aladdin. And after 10 years I would hope the persistent vandal has moved on - lol - so protection not really needed anymore - and this is not a controversial topic or page.
65.127.183.235 (
talk)
13:43, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement – Related to both
WP:ARBIP and
WP:ARBPIA4.
Invalid
OS (
talk)
15:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
El_C
16:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article was already moved to draftspace on 18 January 2020 and pending review. It has been recreated by same editor today in mainspace which I've also moved to draftspace. There's a possibility it may be recreated again but the editor needs to wait patiently. Protecting this will prevent recreation and display the draft notice.
Steven (Editor) (
talk)
16:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined One recreation is not repeatedly.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There appears to be a bunch of socks trying to remove sourced material from this page.
Jacona (
talk)
17:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. , i've also blocked 2 editors for making legal threats. There is possible meat/sock-puppetry, but I've not blocked the third editor on those grounds at this point.
Nosebagbear (
talk)
18:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Subject of article charged with child sexual abuse, will need temporary protection to prevent vandalism which has already started.
Mountain
cirque
15:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk)
15:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism.
Lard Almighty (
talk)
15:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
16:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism by an unregistered editor using multiple IP addresses.
ElKevbo (
talk)
16:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
16:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Has been repeatedly redirected by IPs to his brother's page. Does not seem to have been taken to AfD at any time.
Pam
D
12:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk)
13:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Latest target of the tech support scam bots, see
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Heads up: addition of potentially malicious material to computer security article. If past targets are any indication, this will go on for quite a while from different IPs.
MrOllie (
talk)
15:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
15:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Longer-term semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Gleeanon409 (
talk)
05:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked:
Risenbarry (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
NinjaRobotPirate.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from sockpuppet.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
07:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
El_C
10:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (ec)
User(s)
blocked:
Doyencarps (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Widr. If another turns up just ask any admin.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An IP-user has started spamming my talk page by restoring their nonsense on my talk page.
[24]
[25]
[26]. That IP ignores my edit summaries and just restores their stuff.
Wario-Man (
talk)
07:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I've blocked the IP for 24 hours. If it continues to engage in the same behavior after it expires I'll extend the block. If (I suspect when) it hops IPs, I'll do a range block.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
08:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. For the bot.
El_C
10:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism by an editor using multiple IP addresses.
ElKevbo (
talk)
06:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Article has been subject for numerous IP vandalism due to the company's issue with its radio/TV franchise renewal. -
WayKurat (
talk)
06:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article keeps getting recreated this should be salted until draft is able to pass AFC.
Alucard 16
❯❯❯ chat?
08:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected indefinitely.
El_C
10:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi protection: - IP vandalism again.
BabbaQ (
talk)
08:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
10:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple IPs attacking this school article.
Meters (
talk)
08:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Centrallibraryb (
talk)
04:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
05:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Shhhhwwww!! (
talk)
05:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Large scale vandalism by possible sockpuppets of different users. Also, please revert to the last clean version.
Java
Hurricane
06:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses – with regards to the budget of the film.
Timur9008 (
talk) 9:11, 24 Februrary 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
09:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Slow vandalism/socking.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
17:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The editor responsible for all problem edits in the last three weeks has been blocked by
Favonian.
Chetsford (
talk)
17:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Migsmigss (
talk)
00:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
01:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Pers. vandalism. Sensitive chemical.
tLoM (The Lord of Math) (
Message)
03:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 3 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued addition of false/unsourced information.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
04:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
00:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pending changes.
El_C
01:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP nonsense and speculation.
98.230.196.188 (
talk)
02:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
02:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism .
Joeykai (
talk)
03:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued BLP-vios after previous protection expired.
Hipal/Ronz (
talk)
03:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
03:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This article gets constant vandalism from IP editors. I propose indefinite semi-protection, since this article isn't likely to require timely edits.
Tdc42 (
talk)
19:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry.
Migsmigss (
talk)
19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Question: what am I looking at?
El_C
23:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It should be persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk)
23:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
00:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
00:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
01:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced data.
Davidelit
(Talk)
00:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
01:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Opencooper (
talk)
01:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
01:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Semi, or block the IP, who is clearly either MEAT or DUCK.
John from Idegon (
talk)
01:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
01:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by proven sockpuppets.
Migsmigss (
talk)
18:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, but now it's been heavily and persistently targeted by proven sockpuppeteers and their puppets, please review. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk)
22:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The bot doesn't care!
El_C
23:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism.
Migsmigss (
talk)
19:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent attacks from
2600:387:5:800:0:0:0:0/60 going to back to at least 2017, too much collateral on that range for a block IMO.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk)
20:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- And maybe indef PC on top of that.
This lasted a week in a BLP until an IP reverted it...
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk)
20:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Edits done by unconfirmed IPs do not come with any single RS.
Migsmigss (
talk)
20:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism.
Gilbert.JW (
talk)
21:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
GorillaWarfare.
El_C
23:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism is being made due to a marketing stunt.
Mr Xaero
☎️
21:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
GorillaWarfare.
El_C
23:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Blend of vandalism and questionable, unsourced content by a couple of IPs.
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
21:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
23:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – anonymous users (possibly the same person) continues to add a currently defunct record label into the infobox despite previous edit summary given earlier.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk)
21:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anons keep adding members. May be correct, but it is unsourced.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
22:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Article was indef semi-protected 11 years ago (!), to me it seemed unnecessary at that time to begin with, but especially now.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
23:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected.
El_C
23:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs are having an edit war over this page.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
06:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated in draft space and in article space, mostly by sockpuppets. Request ECP in both draft space and article space so that only experienced neutral editors can create.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
20:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected Indef.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
22:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent vandalism from ip.
Ozzie10aaaa (
talk)
22:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
23:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
19:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article vandalized several times today from different IPs.
Alt.Donald Albury (
talk)
20:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Addition of false information by IPs.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page seems to get a lot of useful IP edits, but also a lot of not useful IP edits, and there are very few page watchers to sift between the two. PC protection will bring more editors in to separate the good from the bad. —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Gnarby had a good performance in a Champions League match and some editors are wanting to rub that into his opponent. ECP or new editor protection for one week please.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
13:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
20:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Several problematic edits from various IPs registered to
Texas Tech University over the past week. –
Skywatcher68 (
talk)
15:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·
a·po·des
19:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – New users adding unsourced controversial content repeatedly. .
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
15:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The levels of disruption here are very high, and the article is in the news. I have therefore semi-protected this for 24 hours, despite being involved, per
WP:IAR. I would greatly appreciate another administrator reviewing this action, and modifying it in any way they feel to be necessary.
Vanamonde (
Talk)
16:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- thx
Vanamonde93, this 24 hr relief is much appreciated. As a note for the reviewing admin, this article falls under
WP:ACDS
WP:ARBIPA
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
16:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The risk of distruptive editing are very high, so while is acceptable to semi-protected in 24 hours it is not sufficient to have only for 24 hours. IMO, any article that have very high attention should have semi-protected at least 1 week. If this article was unprotected in next 24 hours many IP users return to disrupt the editing and vandalize the content. So maybe enforce the arbitration sanctions where written about India/Pakistan/Afghanistan to this article.
180.242.51.208 (
talk)
16:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot.
El_C
20:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from multiple IP addresses. There's a meme circulating right now.
RahulG (
talk)
15:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·
a·po·des
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring facts supported by disputed census.
Dr.
K.
18:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
20:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing/warring by an IP user over a number of different addresses, refuses to use Talk to discuss dispute.
Ajf773 (
talk)
19:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit war seems to involve IPs and at least one extended confirmed editor, so full protected to encourage everyone to use the talk page. —
Wug·
a·po·des
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs.
Puduḫepa
13:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Please see
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Tirgil34.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
CptViraj (
📧)
13:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist. —
Wug·
a·po·des
19:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism by the same user with various IP.
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed:
BLP policy violations.
Elizium23 (
talk)
01:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined The problem user is still blocked from editing that page. If they return then let me know.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and newly-created accounts.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
09:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Obviously a biog which is on the syllabus for Canadian schools, hence a high and ongoing level of IP vandalism.
Andy Dingley (
talk)
14:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See history of sockpuppetry at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlekK19. Recommend ECP in both draft space and article space.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
18:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- May I suggest not salting it because it serves as an easy to spot
honeypot.
Praxidicae (
talk)
18:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Bacondrum (
talk)
00:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Ip users, high traffic article, likely to be high traffic for several months.
Hemiauchenia (
talk)
01:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
02:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
02:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long-term disruption.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
02:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition by American IP about unofficial unverified infos.
Flix11 (
talk)
04:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Commonly vandalized; reversions are often missed.
Outriggr (
talk)
07:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-Protection:
IP disruptive editing over the last couple of weeks. Requesting a short-term page protection to discourage it.
GUtt01 (
talk)
08:06, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism because of the current political climate in Malaysia. Requesting for semi protection for at least two weeks until things settle down.
Lulusword
(talk)
08:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
10:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism which seems to be getting more frequent and would save a lot of time in rollbacks and undos.
Brandon Downes (
talk)
00:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
01:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Doc Strange
Mailbox
Logbook
01:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
02:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping
vandalism and serious BLP violations after recent end of previous protection.
Kilumley (
talk)
02:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent editing against
this consensus achieved via RfC in 2018, which determined that
Tyson Fury was not considered the lineal heavyweight boxing champion between 18 October 2016 and 22 February 2020.
Mac Dreamstate (
talk)
17:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit-warring. .
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
17:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Regularly, an anonymous user edits the page, making it look as if the band has split up, without providing a source for this. I have checked the band's official website and social media channels, which all suggest the band is still together.
PPP (
talk)
18:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequent vandalism. There appears to be a recently very active vandal targeting African American astronauts like McNair,
Guion Bluford, and
Mae Jemison. ---
C&
C (
Coffeeandcrumbs)
21:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Dynamic IP removing sourced content.
McSly (
talk)
21:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Hi, this article is facing promotional content issues as well as more serious fishing attack URL insertion. Would be good to put some protection on it. The subject of this article is a well know mainstream financial services company and fishing on this article could be for the purpose of identity theft. Thanks! .
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
19:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – See
User talk:169.199.168.221 - we've got someone using two IP addresses pushing some sort of pov.
Doug Weller
talk
19:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – And disruptive editing.
Amaury •
20:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant back and forth over the inclusion of a band called
TWICE. To be fair the label appears to be reliably sourced on the band's article page.
Rob
van
vee
16:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted three times and repeatedly recreated. No evidence that this software will ever gain notability.
Hog Farm (
talk)
18:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected indefinitely.
El_C
18:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
El C: Do you mind reducing this to ECP (especially since indef)? No creations were by an ECP confirmed editor afaics. --
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – He is now hot topic in the media. And the article was edited by IPs and they are adding contents which don't follow our policies.
S. M. Nazmus Shakib (
talk)
19:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
19:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
19:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., blocked an account.
Doug Weller
talk
19:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Protection: Persistent
vandalism – Six months after PC-protection ended; vandalism mostly by IP editors.
George Ho (
talk)
15:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
El_C
18:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Unregistered IPs repeatedly adding unsourced questionable relationship information to BLP.
JamesG5 (
talk)
15:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Frequently recreated despite
WP:TOOSOON.
IceWelder [
✉]
15:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruption by multiple IPs against talk page consensus, the most recent discussion is at
Talk:Nicola Sturgeon#Her nationality again and also refers to previous ones.
FDW777 (
talk)
16:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of yet another year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
18:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Sakiv (
talk)
17:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
18:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Almost every edit has been vandalism or reversion of vandalism. It appears to have been like this for a while.
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk)
18:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
El_C
18:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
(Indefinite?) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Article with a long history of vandalism about a
WP:BLP and short term protections that don't do much.
Coltsfan (
talk)
18:16, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
El_C
18:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP's .
Class455 (
talk|
stand clear of the doors!)
11:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – IP editor keeps making allegations of sexual abuse.
Le Deluge (
talk)
11:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism of names by both newly registered and unregistered accounts.
epicgenius (
talk)
14:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked:
Darthvadertruffle123 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
CambridgeBayWeather.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Alivardi (
talk)
10:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: In the last couple of days, following Duffy's widely reported announcement on 25 February 2020 that she was a victim of a serious crime, there has been vandalism (some offensive and a serious BLP violation) and some disruptive editing by IP users as well. I feel that short-term temporary semi-protection would be appropriate.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk)
11:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Various IPs trying to add mis-spelling of official URL that goes to some sort of spam site, per
Wikipedia:Teahouse#Spamming_with_incorrect_information. Would blacklisting the spam URL (ownlyfans.com) instead be better?. —[
AlanM1(
talk)]—
12:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring.
Elizium23 (
talk)
07:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – For some reason, this is suddenly the target of a pile of nonsense.
EpicVeryCoolRandomGamerLol is apparently a vandalism-only account as well. —[
AlanM1(
talk)]—
07:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined, the disruption stopped two days ago, and the edits of the account look to me like vandalism reverts rather than vandalism--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ymblanter: There were three IPs involved in the vandalism and two others reverting, so I guess I mis-read one of the diffs of the newbie kiddie-sounding username and didn't think twice about it. Still seems coincidental they just happened across the article while it was happening, but I'll keep a closer eye on it (and them) for a while. Note the original vandal is a nice tight range (198.232.183.0/24) for a Maryland school district. Thanks. —[
AlanM1(
talk)]—
09:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I see it actually as vandalism spree, and I do not think anything is coincidental there, I would have protected two days ago, I just think now it is too late.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Introduction and reintroduction of libelous material into a BLP. Also vandalism. From early February but then also from this last week.
Oska (
talk)
10:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
02:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Non-stop disruption by some IP-hoppers.
Wario-Man (
talk)
08:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Fuzheado |
Talk
12:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Spam magnet - almost every edit to the article over the past few months has been spam/promotion. Suggest PC since it's a low-traffic article, but semi will work too.
creffett (
talk)
01:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple accounts
Tdts5 (
talk)
04:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Repeated addition of hoaxes about a nonexistent UK English dub.
Blake Gripling (
talk)
04:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Tymon.r
Do you have any questions?
00:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by various IP addresses in recent weeks since the last temporary protection was lifted on 8 February 2020.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk)
02:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Let's try this - last month, this page was vandalized heavily. It's occurred in exactly the same fashion stating exactly the same things as last month a couple of times since, including tonight. Pending changes for a little while would hopefully help deter this, as there appear to be some useful IP edits.
Red Phoenix
talk
03:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism.
Editor2020 (
talk)
03:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content.
Migsmigss (
talk)
04:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or non-RS information.
Migsmigss (
talk)
04:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Obvious and frequent vandalism from anon IPs. Vjmlhds 04:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
08:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Teishin (
talk)
20:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: This article I can see is going to be high traffic with vandalism.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
22:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
MelanieN (
talk)
Indefinite semi-protection: I just want an admin to protect my user editnotice so that IP vandals will not be able to ruin it or replace it with something else. —
B. L.
I. R. •
C
01:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. There have only been 2 edits, both of them yours.
— Maile (
talk)
01:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors persist in recreating article which was changed to a redirect by AfD process in contravention of consensus. See
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saagar Enjeti.
Melmann
17:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment This is partially my fault, as the editor in question brought an additional source covering the subject and asked me if it was enough to establish notability. I didn't have time to assess it in the context of the other coverage available, so I suggested that they add it to the article and boldly recreate it on the grounds that the new source may have been a sufficient improvement over the AfD. Now that the edit has been reverted, I wouldn't anticipate any further edit warring. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Per above.
El_C
20:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP vandals seem to LOVE this page. I don't know a thing about basketball, so I'm not sure why.
- Sumanuil (
talk)
22:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Protection was just lifted yesterday and persistent vandalism has quickly returned.
Jake (
talk)
22:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users.
L1amw90 (
talk)
18:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
MelanieN. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
20:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3.5 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
20:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP/new editor vandalism. --
LuK3
(Talk)
19:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
20:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Create protection.
FaisalAhmedzm (
talk)
12:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Page does not exist. Are you asking for it to be salted?
Useight (
talk)
15:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. (Non-administrator response)
Invalid
OS
talk
16:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Page has been the target of persistent vandalism, disruptive, and unsourced edits, from numerous "throwaway" accounts, for over a year.
IamNotU (
talk)
17:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Previously infinite semi protected. Lots of unconstructive edits by IPs.
Brown Chocolate (
talk)
17:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. The article was placed under indefinite semi-protection in 2015. Six months ago the semi was lifted as an experiment to see if it was still needed. Result: yes, it is still needed. I'm restoring the indefinite semi-protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – 3 months required. Disruption started as soon as older protection ended. —
Vaibhavafro
💬
13:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – many ips changing "her/actress" to "him/actor" .
LakesideMiners
Come Talk To Me!
14:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ohnoitsjamie.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Barkeep
Chat
14:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuing disruptive editing of
WP:MILL sensitive content against talk page consensus.
Willsome429 (
say hey or
see my edits!)
17:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There is still vandalism ongoing by both named and IP users after
Darthvadertruffle123 was blocked.
epicgenius (
talk)
17:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:09, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP/non-autoconfirmed vandalism and BLP violations. . --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jayjg
(talk)
17:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Unsourced additions by a few IPs the past few days. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jayjg
(talk)
17:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since September 2019 IP editors have been removing sourced information from this
WP:BLP and adding unsourced (and
WP:MOS violating) claims. The pace of these edits have picked up in the past couple of weeks.
Jayjg
(talk)
16:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
17:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Uptick in IP vandalism.
Jorm (
talk)
16:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
17:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Socking vandal repeatedly vandalising my userspace.
N0nsensical.system
(err0r?)
(.log)
09:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
11:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP editor keeps claiming consensus for labelling this as "quackery" when there's not, and the category was explicitly deleted at
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_11#Category:Quackery. I'm no fan of pseudoscience, but I don't think the IP's approach is helpful.
Le Deluge (
talk)
11:25, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
11:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
FaisalAhmedzm (
talk)
11:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
11:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – See
User:Meters/Reese's hoax. Hoaxer has switched to this article since
Reese's Whipps,
Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, and
Reese's Pieces were protected.
Meters (
talk)
04:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.. I've applied a range block to
67.69.69.0/24, which should resolve the disruption. Let me know if disruption continues from another range and I'll be happy to take a look.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
08:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
08:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
New York NHL teams
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
08:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week (each), after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs who are obviously children keep adding unnecessary details, generally with terrible grammar and spelling.
Cpotisch (
talk)
01:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP trolling of a user page used to collect information on a persistent vandal.
Meters (
talk)
04:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
05:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk)
06:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection or at least Pending Changes: persistent BLPO vandalism by IP addresses.
Muzilon (
talk)
07:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Jingiby (
talk)
07:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes:
WP:ARBDS.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
22:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – May need
WP:ARBDS imposed.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
22:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and
disruptive editing – IP vandalism. This is mostly just because the episode is currently airing and is very susceptible to vandalism. 24 hours would be fine, we can extend it if needed.
Jayab
314
01:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Controversial article currently on the
WP:MAINPAGE with high volume of edits and disruption. Article under
wP:ACDS
wP:ARBIPA. 24 hr protection has expired. .
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
16:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jayron
32
16:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection Persistent disruptive
Old Firm related vandalism.
The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk)
21:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated attempts to remove sourced content relating to a controversy.
ViperSnake151
Talk
22:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP users return their distruptive editing shortly after the article is unprotected.
180.242.51.208 (
talk)
23:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Dekimasu.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism.
Huldra (
talk)
23:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism starting yesterday. --
LuK3
(Talk)
20:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Currently under attack by a sock farm.
WikiDan61
ChatMe!
ReadMe!!
20:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated attempts by SPAs to delete the page
[27],
[28],
[29],
[30],
[31]. Thank you.
Rubelantri (
talk)
20:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
qedk (
t 桜
c)
20:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. ~~
CAPTAIN MEDUSA
talk
14:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lets see how that goes and if the disruption returns I'll protect for longer. —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent petty vandalism, specifically repeated removal of notable postnominals without explanation, or on unjustified grounds of "self-promotion".
GrindtXX (
talk)
14:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: Both templates are only tool used to form categories on which they are used, and that categories will break if the templates break.
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
15:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:
Arbitration enforcement – Given a recent user's block, I'd enforce
WP:ARBDS.
IanDBeacon (
talk)
18:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
22:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: I'll probably request a partial block on their talk page in case they withdraw the legal threat.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
22:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP and newbie BLP-vio vandalism. I'm not sure why, but this article has recieved an ever-increasing level of BLP-vio vandalism since over a year ago (January 2019). Please therefore make the semi-protection as long as possible.
Softlavender (
talk)
13:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected The indef shouldn't mean forever, but I'm worried that setting a specific time for unprotection will just lead to bad faith editors waiting the protection out. It's probably worth unprotecting in about a month. —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There have been multiple incidents of vandalism by IP users over the past week. .
REDMAN 2019 (
talk)
14:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected —
Wug·
a·po·des
21:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection or ECP per
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive306#Proposal:_Extended-confirmed_protection_for_India-Pakistan_conflict.
Highly controversial article which got unprotected to IP addresses after going through a recent full protection.
Orientls (
talk)
07:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I'm not sure about whether I should have chosen indefinite. Any admin might like to alter with no need for consultation.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Per discussions at
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Christopher_Langan and
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Christopher_Michael_Langan - BLP violations, possible off-wiki coordination, edit warring.
creffpublic a
creffett franchise (
talk to the boss)
18:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Changed to temporary - the BLP issues need to be dealt with (which is why I went ahead and requested protection while the discussion is ongoing), but I'm willing to wait for consensus at AN before going from temporary to indefinite.
creffpublic a
creffett franchise (
talk to the boss)
18:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I didn't see any particularly useful IP edits in the history (though it was admittedly a mess from the edit wars) so I semi-protected instead of PC protecting it to prevent BLP violations in the edit history. I'll leave a fuller explanation at the AN thread. —
Wug·
a·po·des
20:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, unsourced/unexplained changes
Urbanoc (
talk)
19:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
19:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – User page repeatedly recreated with promotional material, account blocked as well. --
LuK3
(Talk)
17:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
17:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Note: Weren't before; blocked now.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
17:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – User MG2020DTC was blocked for sockpuppetry a few weeks ago and since then they keep adding unsourced and promotional contents to the article using sock accounts and IP addresses. .
GSS
💬
02:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant advertising by companies to promote their tours/guides in Egypt.
Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ •
Talk to me∕
What have I been doing
09:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lapse of previous protection has not succeeded in preventing IP vandalism that was seen in the past. CaradhrasAiguo (
leave language)
05:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
CaradhrasAiguo: Sorry but there have been only two edits by one IP and that is not sufficient to justify protection. I'm sure you are right that disruption will continue but we have to wait for that to occur.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Currently prominent in the news due to delivery of CAS doping ban, attracting multiple vandals now and likely to attract more in the next couple of days .
Rusty Springs (
talk)
10:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
12:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Today's
Google Doodle is about this person, causing attention to the article.
194.218.10.150 (
talk)
12:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I wrote the request, accidentally logged out.--
BIL (
talk)
12:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Low volume but persistent vandalism.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
00:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandals are removing some sourced content from the WaPo. I've advised them a few times to take it to the article's Talk page for
WP:CONSENSUS, but this may be the same person considering the timeframe. .
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
02:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
TheDeviantPro (
talk)
07:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long term IP vandalism.
Krimuk2.0 (
talk)
09:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
12:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: To match protection level of parent
Template:Category class, which has 37,740 transclusions. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
10:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected.
Favonian (
talk)
10:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism from several new users and ips.
Jake (
talk)
02:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
08:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. Have had to revert adding unrelated company names, dates, nonexistent shows, etc.
Hammill Ten (
talk)
03:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent High level of IP vandalism potentially from the same person utilizing different IP address. Have had to revert many times unsourced contested entries--
Richie Campbell (
talk)
05:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
09:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – vandalism of information.
Hoppeboy13 (
talk)
12:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Single-issue new user trying to delete page and not following procedure.
Rob Myers (
talk)
23:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined User is attempting to nominate the article for deletion in good faith. I've procedurally nominated the page at AFD where the notability issue can be resolved. —
Wug·
a·po·des
02:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Egregious BLP violations; please also consider deleting the intervening revisions. .
Vanamonde (
Talk)
02:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done I've semi-protected for a week and PC protected for a month after which the page will be unprotected. There seem to be a lot of BLP violations with the occasional helpful IP so I'm hesitant to restrict IP editing for too long. —
Wug·
a·po·des
02:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Vanamonde93: I've looked through the revision history and nothing has stuck out as needing revdel; am I missing something? —
Wug·
a·po·des
03:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Wugapodes: If you read through his article, and the linked articles about his recent political activities, you may appreciate why the suggestion that he is Pakistani is inflammatory; however, this does fall in the grey area between vandalism and deletable BLP violation, so I leave it up to you.
Vanamonde (
Talk)
03:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Vanamonde93: I'll admit to being less knowledgeable on India-Pakistan conflicts than I perhaps ought to be. I'll look through the history again with that in mind. —
Wug·
a·po·des
03:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
User:Andrew Hendo (
talk)
00:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done Semid a few weeks, PCd for a bit longer. Weird, intermittent history, but not a lot good, and some very bad. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
01:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Active vandalism, with several reverts per minute, from
2605:A000:1619:8122:8174:B833:4D91:C3A (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS) who was
74.134.233.83 (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS) until a few minutes ago. Might require confirmed-protection on
Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. (It appears that
User:CLCStudent is fighting the good fight but the IP vandal apparently has some understanding of Wikipedia tools also.).
Closeapple (
talk)
21:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
ToBeFree. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
01:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced information. This vandalism is also starting to get traction within the online Power Rangers fandom on social media so it's only likely to increase.
JPG-GR (
talk)
23:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There seem to be good and bad edits, so I've pending changes protected for now to allow helpful IP edits to continue. —
Wug·
a·po·des
02:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Check the latest edits and the activities of the last editor.
❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁
(❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁)
13:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Two IPs, each within a very tight window. The bit from a week or so ago seems possibly related, but regardless doesn't seem to be an ongoing threat for now. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
20:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
00:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Useight (
talk)
00:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Revert of the positions by round table based on an obscure poll. The main reverter being
HawkAussie.
RafaelS1979 (
talk)
15:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I don't see any attempt to discuss this on the talk page. If you disagree with their position, explain why on the talk page, and see if consensus agrees with you.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and general disruptive edits. --
LuK3
(Talk)
17:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk)
20:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There are on-going problems with IPs removing information from the article, lasting two+ years. The edit summaries include accusations that information could have been added by the two authors of the book in question (it was not, as I'm not affiliated with the autors, the University of Utah, nor Oxford University Press). The first one is a static IP that is located 20 miles from the company HQ is Atglen PA:
Special:Contributions/96.83.215.201, suggesting a COI. The latest is a dynamic IP, also from Pennsylvania:
Special:Contributions/73.165.26.73. They have been reverted by multiple editors, but the removals continue.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
19:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely., I configured pending changes instead, the disruption is in my opinion too infrequent for semi-protection--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
14:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Muboshgu.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
14:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
14:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
14:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
16:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism has returned, five reverts yesterday.
Brandmeister
talk
10:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – The article is in news and some new users are repeatedly calling Living persons as terrorists
[32], murderers etc, violating
WP:BLP I have been removing a lot of this but I think a protection now is needed to end this circus. Another page editor shared his concerns on this
[33]. --
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
10:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined. If there is persistent BLP violating material then they can be blocked.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
CambridgeBayWeather, They are not the same users, so blocks may not be effective. I remember removing BLP Violating comments more than 10 times all from different users, just today. Also there are
WP:COPYVIO with 2 CV revdels already ,
see log)
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
10:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- (Non-administrator comment) page was protected by
User:El C --
⋙–DBig
Xrayᗙ
17:07, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
El C. (for the bot)
MelanieN (
talk)
17:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
14:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Vandalism – IP user(s) removing sourced content, without any explanation .
Redalert2fan (
talk)
14:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:09, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – Hi, we are still having trouble with fishing websites being added. Please make full protect.
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
16:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- note this is a high risk identity theft risk. thanks!
Jtbobwaysf (
talk)
17:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed protected for the duration of the original protection that
QEDK applied. Hopefully that stops the immediate disruption. @
Jtbobwaysf: If problems persist after protection expires, indefinite pending changes protection is probably the route I would suggest so that editors can review changes for malicious links. —
Wug·
a·po·des
01:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP vandalism due to his recent appointment as the new prime minister.
Lulusword
(talk)
09:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
11:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
13:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
14:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Page Protection may seem to be indicated for the "
Betelgeuse" page - Rationale => recent target of ip vandalism (several times in one day? => including
1 +
2) - possible Page Protection Type => "([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite))" - in any case - Enjoy :)
Drbogdan (
talk)
04:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Drbogdan: I warned the user. Edit warring should be reported at
WP:AN3. If it happens again, that user can be blocked. We don't protect pages due to the actions of one IP address. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
04:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving... for the bot.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
04:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. by
Acroterion for edit-warring. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
05:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection may be warranted given the current Internet meme and page alterations.
Q8682 (
talk)
05:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing.
Plandu (
talk)
05:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Causa sui.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
10:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor is vandalising the article.
Mclarenfan17 (
talk)
23:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined @
Mclarenfan17: The IP has been blocked for a short period. Please ping me or post again if the problem persists.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq: thanks for that. I didn't see the block.
Mclarenfan17 (
talk)
02:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended-confirmed-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit-warring/content dispute.
Train of Knowledge (
Talk)
02:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. –
RPGAdventurer (
talk ·
contribs) blocked per a complaint at
WP:AN3.
EdJohnston (
talk)
02:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring/content dispute.
Train of Knowledge (
Talk)
02:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. –
RPGAdventurer (
talk ·
contribs) blocked per a complaint at
WP:AN3.
EdJohnston (
talk)
02:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This template is use for transclution on the
Canada article and should have the same protection level as the article is used on.
Moxy 🍁
01:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – IP range has been rangeblocked but for some reason he's still able to abuse IPs from the same range (?). - .
LouisAragon (
talk)
01:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
LouisAragon:
Special:Contributions/2605:E000:151E:8000:0:0:0:0/50 is only page blocked to prevent edits to
Caucasian Imamate. If you know whether that range is performing good or bad edits, please comment
here where I asked about the range.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection: This article has been a target of IP vandalism since its creation. I've requested a permanent protection for this article at least once before and my request was declined. With the amount of vandalism we are facing nowadays, I think it's the best time to do it now.
Ben5218 (
talk)
01:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP hopping.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk)
01:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It's been a great hit circulating Target Facebook groups and the Target subreddit today. —
Duncan
What I Do /
What I Say
02:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: The Ip hopper was advised to go to the talk page and discuss but has chosen to keep reverting material instead.
Ymblanter (
talk)
02:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
03:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: This template is the only tool used to form the 200+categories on which it is used, and that categories will break if the template breaks. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
23:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
BrownHairedGirl: I would be inclined to indefinitely template-protect the page but it only has 203 transclusions and
Wikipedia:High-risk templates is irritatingly vague. Any other opinions?
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I added Template:PolParsEstCatDecade (27 transclusions) to this request as it needs the same response.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Johnuniq, Thanks for adding that. I came here to add it myself, but you beat me too it.
- I regard cat headers as a special vulnerability, because if they are screwed up, then the categories break. I have made several other similar requests in the last few days, for cat header templates, and hey have all been approved. The latest approvals were by @
Wugapodes and
Favonian. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
02:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Template protected indefinitely. Next time please link to a similar situation.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Date vandalism. See also
WP:KIDSTVDATES.
Amaury •
00:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of undiscussed artist removals by IPs without consensus; no luck on talk page.
ANDROS1337
TALK
00:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
00:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism and disruptive editing.
Movies Time (
talk)
13:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
23:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP/new editor vandalism and BLP violation. --
LuK3
(Talk)
15:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: Page has had numerous IP users vandalize it throughout the day. —
Mr Xaero
☎️
21:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: At least a dozen different IP users and several named users have vandalized this page so far today.
NomadicNom (
talk)
21:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
23:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and BLP violation. Three instances of different IPs very specifically changing the birth year of the person within the last 2 days.
Tayi Arajakate
Talk
16:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
23:11, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Someone, without any citation at all, is highly convinced that this ride is going to be replaced with a ride themed to the Castlevania video game series. They have been adding this questionable information back, after people have removed it, for almost a year. Research does not show any evidence to back up this claim.
Austinuity (
talk)
16:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
23:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Been getting bombed with trolling from multiple ip addresses.
John from Idegon (
talk)
18:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
23:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection. Previously protected, we are now seeing the return of an IP hopping vandal who is making edits such as
this to this BLP. A great many of these edits have been suppressed previously. See
extensive log to that effect. Last protection for this was for a week. Recommending something longer this time. --
Hammersoft (
talk)
22:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
23:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
- @
Widr: Users being blocked isn't sufficient. That's why I'm asking for the protection. The person in question is in a dynamic host pool, and is dancing across IPs. To date, they have used at least 9 different IP addresses to conduct this vandalism. This was previously protected for the same reason
[34]. If the article isn't protected, the person will very possibly be back within the next day doing the same grossly abusive BLP violations on the article. --
Hammersoft (
talk)
02:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry to step in without discussion but the BLP argument looks convincing.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes.
Jetstreamer
Talk
19:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
23:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
DemocraticLuntz (
talk)
19:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
23:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – someone is persistently vandalizing it.
DemocraticLuntz (
talk)
20:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Widr (
talk)
23:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Change to semi-protection: Currently set to have pending changes. However, every single edit since this protection level was added a month ago has been reverted. It's just a drain on resources for editors patroling the pending changes log. Thanks.
Lugnuts
Fire Walk with Me
22:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply
Done
Widr (
talk)
23:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
reply