- 2017
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 February 2017
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 13:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing IP BLP violations. DuncanHill ( talk) 14:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
24 Hour Semi - Today's Google Doodle. So, pretty much the normal routine. The vandalism has already started and will only get worse as the West Coast starts to wake up. TimothyJosephWood 15:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, and thanks to Timothyjosephwood and others for their attention to the article. Needs protection ASAP. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To be on the safe side.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Official Habib University Wikipedia page and should be protected from all users except for the administrator. -- Yohsin14 ( talk) 08:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. It's not anyone's official page - it is an encyclopaedia article. If it needs protecting then it needs protecting against actual vandals as defined by Wikipedia, not against "all users except for the administrator" - that is not how we work. And indefinite protection sounds like a long time - where is the actual vandalism? Best wishes DBaK ( talk) 10:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Disruption here is from autoconfirmed users, and is promotion of the subject, rather than vandalism directed at it. OP provides no policy-based reason for protection.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 14:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Goodnightmush
Talk
16:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection -- incessant vandalism (see [1]). Quis separabit? 15:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
15:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Move-protection: The RM did not agree with using "(minister)". The move happened months before recent reverse back to "clergy". -- George Ho ( talk) 20:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The move against consensus took place many months ago: I see no justification for protection.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 11:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator
Samsara.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 12:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Samsara.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 12:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – My User talk is constantly vandalized, by a very persistent IP. Bel-Shamharoth ( talk) 07:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry — Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat. — MBlaze Lightning T 10:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Indefinitely.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 12:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
13:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking by User:David700118 to mention a non-notable "legendary health scientist". McGeddon ( talk) 12:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
13:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP making a mess of the results table formatting and also has some serious WP:OWN issues. Number 5 7 20:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from one IP number. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 21:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- To be honest, it looks like content dispute to me.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree with
Ymblanter but the dispute is severe enough to warrant protection against edit-warring for a while.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sock-hopping IP, who is edit-warring over information that violates {{TI|Infobox television]] and MOS:TV. livelikemusic talk! 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 11 weeeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Samsara
11:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Edits by Eurocentral
- Origin of the Romanians ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Gorals ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by an IP sock of banned User:Eurocentral. Borsoka ( talk) 05:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston. --
124.217.188.69 (
talk)
06:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ 124.217.188.69: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Indefinitely.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — MBlaze Lightning T 06:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- There is no edit warring involved. The new information is just being ignored by MBlaze Lightning T and other users who still want to list Brahmos as the "fastest missile in the world" despite the contrary facts that the HsiungFeng III missile is now the fastest. Wikipedia should be accurate and not based on Indian national pride. Sorry, I don't mean to offend any Indian, as I like India very much and eat Indian Masala Dosas, Samosas alot but the facts are the facts. Please read here:
43.249.131.132 ( talk) 06:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Semi-protection is not used in such situations, as it would provide one side of the dispute an advantage.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism seems to have hit the roof in the last 24 hours. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Samsara
11:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Vandalism has occurred this month. -- George Ho ( talk) 08:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Intermediate levels of activity, and there haven't been any autoconfirmed changes worth keeping in many months now. Samsara 10:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Samsara
10:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High levels of vandalism from new accounts and IPs since yesterday. bonadea contributions talk 10:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
11:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Samsara
10:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could this page and its watchers be given a bit of a break, please? There are too many comedians keen to make their impact on 21st-century history with their searing witticisms... DBaK ( talk) 10:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
10:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated. DBaK ( talk) 10:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Magnet for BLP violations. St Anselm ( talk) 20:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temp semi-protection: Heavy traffic due to nomination. Home Lander ( talk) 01:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection to minimize relentless back and forth -- article used for hagiography, political whitewashing and revisionism (see [2]). Quis separabit? 02:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 02:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Also, lots of vandalism/edit wars from IPs in 2015. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 17:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Could be seen as a borderline case, with the last disruption in 2015; I've enabled it for now, but I'm open to discussion from other admins on this. Samsara 17:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Samsara
17:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 18:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Samsara
18:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptive action against Persistent disruptive editing. Many previous pages have been targets of vandalism and disruptive edits in the past. StrikeDog ( talk) 20:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Article deleted, can be refunded when there has been a terrorist attack. Samsara 00:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Not done
Samsara
00:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
02 February 2017
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – also indefinite move, highly visible and likely vandal magnet when protection expires. WNYY98 ( talk) 07:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston. and Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection Repeated vandalism including from one logged-in user. Mortee ( talk) 19:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
21:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: repeated vandalism from one IP and two logged-in users over the course of a week. Mortee ( talk) 20:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Done 5 days of semi and 6 weeks of PC. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
21:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguist talk| contribs 14:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. The block is temporary, and they should be invited to create an appropriate user page when the block expires. If the disruptive editing continues, another block may be employed.
Mz7 (
talk)
14:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor with clear COI challenging "libelous and unverified" claims in article attributed to reliable sources. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
20:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 18:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of IP vandalism, by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 22:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism from IP's multiple times within the last week including unsourced content which is later reverted. Previously protected for 1 week but vandalism has continued.
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since this page was last protected, various IPs have continued to add unsourced information. Silverfish ( talk) 15:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since December 6, various IPs have added unsourced information to this page. Silverfish ( talk) 16:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several IPs associated with blocked User:Orchomen editing/reverting on the page. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 16:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 16:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 16:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits (persistent addition of unsourced highly dubious material by a long-term hoaxer in the Philippines). The article was semi-protected for three months on 2 November 2016, with the protection expiring today, and the same IP-hopper (see page history) is already at it again... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of content by an IP-hopper despite being told not to remove said content. JudgeRM (talk to me) 11:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism from IP editors. I am planning on taking this to FL, but the article is extremely vulnerable to vandalism from the subject's strong fanbase, as well as an equal number of haters. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated additions of unreferenced content. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism . Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 15:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper repeatedly removing sourced content in a POV edit war (see page history). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of negative reviews of the series that anonymous editors disagree with. Alex|The|Whovian ? 00:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 04:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumption of shifting-IP nonsense-vandalism about videogames. McGeddon ( talk) 09:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 23:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Presistant disruptive editing. -- 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 12:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No page-move vandalism in the history. Pages are not protected preemptively. -- 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 12:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, page is not protected.
Favonian (
talk)
12:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection Persistent edits from unregistered IP's which have been reverted by multiple users. No attempt to build consensus on Talk page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 18:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, this user Adamgerber80 ( talk) is consistently trying to delete information that is sourced and referenced from the original unaltered article. The original unaltered article contained legitimate sources that have been repeatedly ignored by the biased editor Adamgerber80 ( talk) despite repeated attempts to show him the reference sources that Brahmos is not the fastest missile in the world. He continues to try to delete information from the page to push his nationalistic Indian agenda, and list the Indian made Brahmos as the "fastest missile in the world", when the indisputable facts are against that. His biased Indian nationalistic viewpoints violates Wikipedia official policies and does not maintain a neutral point of view that is based on real facts and not nationalism or emotional content of any kind. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on facts, and not India national pride or anything else except the facts. And the indisputable fact, based on several legit sources, is that the HsiungFeng III missile is currently the fastest missile in the world and the Brahmos is the second fastest. Please read this legit source from 'Indian Defence News', which specifically states the Hsiungfeng III missile is faster than the Brahmos, which the editor Adamgerber80 ( talk) is repeatedly trying to delete from the article:
43.249.129.212 ( talk) 19:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please refrain from personal attacks here. Multiple other editors have reverted edits by the same user on the grounds that the sources are unreliable and have provided alternate sources that refute the said claims. Repeated attempts to get the unregistered user to build consensus on the Talk page of the article has resulted into similar behavior. Can we please protect the article until a consensus has been achieved. Thanks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 20:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, this is not true, please read the sources as they are self-explanatory. Only a few people, including Adamgerber80 ( talk), are trying to delete information from the article. The original unaltered article was intact on Wikipedia due to consensus for almost a year until a few editors, who didn't like the information contained in the article, decided to start deleting sourced and reference information from the original article stating that the Hsiungfeng missile is the fastest missile in the world. Adamgerber80 ( talk) please do put words in my mouth or slander me. You know just as well as I do what these articles say very clearly, they specifically state that the Hsiungfeng III at mach 10 is faster than the Brahmos which travels at Mach 3. And the fact that Adamgerber80 ( talk) desperately wants protection on this article shows his ulterior motive. If a protection occurs Adamgerber80 ( talk) is going to start rapidly deleting the legitimately sourced information on this article violating neutral point of view, which is the official Wikipedia policy. I do not have anything against India or their people as a matter of fact I am a big fan of India, I like India very much, a beautiful country, having traveled to Mumbai and Delhi multiple times, I'm only focused on making sure that the articles are based on facts. Thank you!
Please read the legit source here:
http://defencenews.in/article/At-Mach-10,-Taiwans-Hsiung-Feng-III-Anti-China-Missiles-could-be-faster-than-the-BrahMos-18873 43.249.129.233 ( talk) 20:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment from RCP Or we could block 43.249 temporarly for edit warring and ignoring consensus.
L3X1
My Complaint Desk
21:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Actually a RfC should be held, not a RfPP, as it takes 2 to edit war, and the consensus on the talk page is not clear.
L3X1
My Complaint Desk
21:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- An RfC Has been filed, so please Full This article until the RfC is concluded, per talk page discussion. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 21:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Actually a RfC should be held, not a RfPP, as it takes 2 to edit war, and the consensus on the talk page is not clear.
L3X1
My Complaint Desk
21:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. The edit warring on the main page seems to have stopped.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Lectonar: I would not usually second-guess the decision made by another admin, but I came across this page and the disruption seemed severe enough for me to full-protect it: I hope you don't mind. Vanamonde ( talk) 11:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93. No, I do not mind, but on pages that are experiencing edit warring, temporary full protection should force the parties to discuss their edits on the talk page, where they can reach consensus. Isolated incidents of edit warring, and persistent edit warring by particular users, may be better addressed by blocking, so as not to prevent normal editing of the page by others. The parties are already discussing, so...I think full protection is rather heavyhanded and unnecessary. Regards. Lectonar ( talk) 11:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs and throw-away accounts coordinating attacks on this school page, mostly variations of [3]. Meters ( talk) 01:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
14:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: for three months. This is one of the chief purveyors of fake news and the article is hit constantly with trivial, promotional, silly content. Please semi so that IPs need to discuss their edits. thx Jytdog ( talk) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
15:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 15:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite protection: The page is subject to persistent on and off vandalism by anonymous IP address user 173.61.49.151 since WMGM-TV ceased being an NBC affiliate. The latest vandalism to the WMGM-TV article are located here, here, here and here. This needs to stop ASAP. YborCityJohn ( talk) 04:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- FYI The Anonymous IP user in question has been blocked for three months but I would still feel more comfortable if the page is indefinitely protected in the event they evade the current user block by changing their IP address or using another source to start vandalizing again.
YborCityJohn (
talk)
05:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. With the exception of the now blocked IP, there was scarcely any vandalism. We do not protect preemptively.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Should be protected from users who are editing the article and adding incorrect information to it. -- Yohsin14 ( talk) 07:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 17:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Brad v 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, there is only one user, administrative intervention must be sought against them if still needed.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Multiple cases of unsourced serious allegations placed on the page (claims of being a bystander to an assault). Elisfkc ( talk) 21:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent re-insertion of same text by first one IP (91.148.93.34), now a second (212.178.241.183), first IP refuses to engage on his own or article talk, text is opposed by at least two current page editors and supported by none. Pincrete ( talk) 21:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term protection suggested, if not indefinite. For some reason, there has been a significant spike of vandalism on this topic. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 20:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.,
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely.
Vanamonde (
talk)
11:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Baby miss fortune 10:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
El_C
10:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log/easy target. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection ended mid-2016; not enough disruption for semi.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandal returning over and over again with different IPs, adding the same unsourced and inappropriate material while removing content and vandalizing the page. Alxeedo TALK 19:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – long protection log as well . WNYY98 ( talk) 19:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism/odd edits by multiple editors. Shearonink ( talk) 04:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 04:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of recent vandalism from IP users. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 04:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: A variety of new accounts keep trying to create a promotional page here. Please protect the redirect. Brad v 05:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Anachronist.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations – this bio page getting too much vandalism recently. . Saqib ( talk) 16:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Ymblanter:: thanks but I wonder why two type of protection are being used? Also, i can see pending protection is until August 2017 but for a year.--
Saqib (
talk)
08:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Saqib:: They are independent. The article was heavily vandalized short-term but also less often on a regular basis throughout the year. We need to stop short-term vandalism, and it is currently editing too frequently for pending changes anyway. When the protection expires in a week, the pending changes will be still in force.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Ymblanter:: thanks but I wonder why two type of protection are being used? Also, i can see pending protection is until August 2017 but for a year.--
Saqib (
talk)
08:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized again, again, and over again, a lot of times. Gambler1478 ( talk) 18:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – regarding retirement . WNYY98 ( talk) 05:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
I want to create this page, but it's been salted (even though it was only deleted once). It's notable as a pharmaceutical company because they have several drugs in development. Natureium ( talk) 17:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- I would ask the admin who salted it, but they're long gone. Natureium ( talk) 21:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Template editor protection
JJMC89_bot has finished cleaning up taxonomy templates, but there are a few that have too high a protection level to be fixed. Please either lower the protection level, so I can make the fix, or do it yourself (completely remove |{{{1}}}).
Rkitko, who originally protected this template, doesn't seem to be around much these days.
Peter coxhead (
talk)
07:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done Downgraded to template editor protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinate Semi-protection: Continued vandalism. Deku-shrub ( talk) 14:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Smartse: could you make it indefinite rather than temporary? This isn't going any away time soon Deku-shrub ( talk) 23:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Smartse.
Vanamonde (
talk)
06:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing, IP user continues to make unsourced changes. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
06:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by unregistered users. MON5T3R ( talk) 22:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see only three edits which constitute vandalism since mid-November; not enough activity to warrant protection IMO.
Tabercil (
talk)
00:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: User(on level 4 warning) keeps blanking their talk page. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 23:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed by
Boing! said Zebedee.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
23:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Boing! said Zebedee: And i am very glad to see you are back around Boing! The last thing i remember was that you left before i went on an extensive wikibreak myself. I suppose that is ancient history by now but either way i am glad to see you around. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 23:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 15:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is a persistent IP vandal who keeps coming in and deleting content, seemingly for no reason. Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, Example 4. It could blow over, but the IP vandal seems to be watching the pages.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A plot summary copied from IMDB is being added repeatedly by IP editors in violation of WP:COPYVIO. - Mr X 15:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
User:Acfrinke and others
- User:Acfrinke ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:ASk ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Bradypus ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Rebert ( | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:EnCASF ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Frankonno ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Irelandd ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Jacques-laporte ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Linden Salter ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Luiza Teles ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Marshall H. Pinnix ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Noriaki kakyouin ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Obelix ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Pannkie ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Philsayer17 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Pinof ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Rui Silva ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Ryland ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Sewperman ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Soziallotse~enwiki ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Whitehall.putnam ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Yehuda Falk ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: Wikipedian is deceased. -- 219.79.227.5 ( talk) 02:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Procedural note: combining these protection requests since the request is the same for all of these. JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note The one for Rebert is for the talk page, Those are not usually protected except in cases of vandalism or personal attacks and I can't fine any of that. MarnetteD| Talk 02:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined My condolences to those who knew them; but with due respect, I don't see why the userpage of a deceased Wikipedia needs protection. Indeed I can think of reasons why they shouldn't be protected: non-Wikipedians might use those pages to communicate, etc.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93. Just as a sidenote: full protection of the userpage of a deceased Wikipedian is actually mentioned in the pertaining guidelines:
Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Note: Huh, wasn't aware of that. In which case, I will leave it up to the next admin, because I am not well-versed in the details of what constitutes verification of the death of a Wikipedian.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93. Just as a sidenote: full protection of the userpage of a deceased Wikipedian is actually mentioned in the pertaining guidelines:
Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected indefinitely.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 14:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
02:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Unregistered editors have repeatedly added unsourced content to the page over the last few days. It appears to me that this is one person abusing multiple IPs to wage an edit war. Pending changes protection would help to end this. Trut-h-urts man ( T • C) 22:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it were from one address, it'd qualify as 3RR and thus actionable on a smaller scale. But given that it keeps bouncing around, pending seems suitable. Protecting for 2 weeks to see if this is sufficient to deter the issue.
Tabercil (
talk)
00:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow but steady vandalism by IPs and new users. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Extremely slow....
Lectonar (
talk)
14:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent unexplained deletions (specifically deletions of publicized factual information from RSs) by various IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts, which are possible socks due to said IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts all performing the same actions (all repeatedly remove Jafari's middle name, passing WP:DUCK). Blurp92 ( talk) 19:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon ( talk) 19:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent unexplained reverting by IPs. Quasar G. ( talk) 20:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. three days by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
23:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized by multiple (although seemingly related) accounts in short period of time. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
20:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
03 February 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly content. - Shiesmine ( talk) 17:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Shiesmine: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism. ansh 666 06:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level vandalism on yet-to-be released music album release, by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 13:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please relist if it picks up after end of protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
Extended semi - Honestly I'm just tired of seeing this pop up on my watchlist, and the only reason it's there to begin with is because it's vandalized daily. Vandalism and reversion all the way down, and its an FA to boot. TimothyJosephWood 15:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.,
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Use in more than 3,000 pages. 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 02:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I'm not sure why you keep asking for these to be semi-protected. These have all been declined by several admins in the past... See here, here, here, here, and here. 172.58.41.13 ( talk) 04:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.13 ( talk) 04:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
2601:150:4001:E620:90D2:E8B7:70C6:7834 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Materialscientist.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
13:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated false and slanderous comments in the personal life section, can see in history of edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.44.186.127 ( talk) 21:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ 66.44.186.127: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
ferret (
talk)
22:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
09:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
86.174.162.59 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Widr.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page has been altered with unsupported removal of content, possibly due to current event status from U.S. President related comments (National Prayer Breakfast) today. LaEremita ( talk) 00:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ LaEremita: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Lot of editing but not a great deal of back and forth.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Seems to be multiple IPs adding content copyviod from IMDB here and here. A picture of a dead fish ( talk) 07:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary long term semi-protection: @ Vanamonde93 and Yaris678: as predicted at this RPP, vandalism by restoration of talk page comments by socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411. - DVdm ( talk) 09:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. True, but protection for talk pages is not to be used lightly...this case is bad enough to justify two days of semi, but not longer just yet, IMO.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Vanamonde93: fair enough. But to be continued, no doubt
. Thanks. -
DVdm (
talk)
09:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Vanamonde93: fair enough. But to be continued, no doubt
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wackyike ( talk) 02:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Darkwind (
talk)
03:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism, that was all done by unregistered and new users. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 07:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: This article has been protected since April 2012, as the name "Irene" has been retired, there is no reason to move this page to "Hurricane Irene (2011)". It is the time to unprotect this page. 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 02:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – The article is not protected from anonymous editing. You didn't say if you want the title changed, but if you do, you can ask at
WP:RMTR.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: This article has been protected since June 2012, as the name "Andrew" has been retired, there is no reason to move this page to "Hurricane Andrew (1992)". It is the time to unprotect this page. -- 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 02:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – The article is not protected from anonymous editing. You didn't say if you want the title changed, but if you do, you can ask at
WP:RMTR.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Pending changes not viable; too much vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 02:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes may be proving ineffective here... 172.58.41.13 ( talk) 04:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cyberpower678 it seems that right now PC is not working.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, puerile defamation. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 05:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – ip jumper continues to add unsourced info. Digifan23 ( talk) 05:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Used in 900+ pages. George Ho ( talk) 22:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done – Template editor protection.
EdJohnston (
talk)
04:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced addition or removal of information and images by IP's and new editors due to publication of first look image recently after prolonged hibernation of production and filming details. βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 23:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
05:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I think that article should have semi-protection since it has been vandalized often. BattleshipMan ( talk) 00:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper is repeatedly removing citation needed- and cite web-templates. Disembodied Soul ( talk) 01:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It's been vandalized heavily over the past two days. 十 八 01:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism since April 2015 including repeated attempts to add fictitious characters to the "Notable people" section as well as non-notable local people. Seeking extended or indefinite protection from IP editors and non-autoconfirmed users given the lengthy history of vandalism. Article was protected previously on June 1, 2016 for two days. Hwy43 ( talk) 02:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism since previous protection expired. Lizard ( talk) 19:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: heavy disruptive editing/reverting for months now from a series of anon editors (or, more likely, same editor) in the Philippines. - Brianhe ( talk) 20:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is long-time recurrent, but not terribly frequent. Let's see what PC can do.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Maybe a long "temporary" protection should be used before we consider making it permanent, given he was just sworn in yesterday to a super duper high profile role that will keep him in the news for the foreseeable future. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism from users not logged in. Mccapra ( talk) 22:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
02:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits and vandalism, see history. ∼∼∼∼
Eric0928
Talk
19:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, despite reminders of MOS rules. — Sunnya343✈ ( háblame • my work) 19:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 2 months. IP-hopping edit warrior.
EdJohnston (
talk)
01:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Skemwarrior ( talk) 22:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: IP vandal has now logged in to vandalise. See: Special:Contributions/Tomwilko8. Cheers Skemwarrior ( talk) 22:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocked the vandal account as well.
Hut 8.5
22:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No page-move vandalism. Pages are not protected preemptively. -- 219.79.227.57 ( talk) 12:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Page is not protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: It is move protected indefinitely .--
219.79.227.57 (
talk)
13:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think date pages were subject to vandalism in 2007, and this dates from them. You could say that the vandal must be bored by now... but, if there was going to be page moves on year articles, it would involve many articles and so it would probably be best to reserve it to admins, so the can confirm there is consensus before changing so many pages. Yaris678 ( talk) 18:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: It is move protected indefinitely .--
219.79.227.57 (
talk)
13:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Creation Protection: Due to the recent RfC, can we protect that article from ever being created or moved? That article now redirects to Canada. 135.23.144.238 ( talk) 15:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Question:. The page has been in existence since 2003, so how would creation protection help? The last edit was 20 December 2016 and there has been no protection since 2011. The page has never been moved so I'm unclear on why this request.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)- Declined I think the IP actually wants edit protection, to make it harder to turn this back into an article, from a redirect. However, I think that is unnecessary as there is no history of people editing that page against consensus after the RfC.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: i am requesting that Extended confirmed protection be changed to for one so it would be easier for people to edit donald trump and for two i believe Pending changes protection accomplish the same purpose of suppressing vandalism and other things that are not wanted on wikipedia while still allowing anonymous users and registered users who have not reached 30/500 to edit the article productively . Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 18:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you asked
Ymblanter?
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- This would be a very bad idea given how controversial his presidency is only a couple weeks into it. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Declined Auto-confirmed vandalism was seen at the time the protection was upped to EC, which was only on Sunday. PC won't help against that. If we judge the risk of that has gone down at some point, we may reduce the protection then. The protecting admin expressed the opinion that ECP may be necessary for the duration of his presidency.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection:. Persistent vandalism Shiesmine ( talk) 17:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary and extended full protection: Persistent vandalism. - Shiesmine ( talk) 17:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection:. Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly content. - Shiesmine ( talk) 17:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection:. Persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy. - Shiesmine ( talk) 17:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Targeted by IP-hoppers and IP-socks who did same edits on Modu Chanyu, compare these edit summaries [4] [5]. Modu Chanyu is semi-protected due to similar non-stop edits by these IPs. Wario-Man ( talk) 15:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- The editor is asking for protection to ignore the argument and justify himself. Please check: everything is very clear-- 88.251.216.130 ( talk) 15:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Modern Harpoon ( talk) 15:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:. Content dispute. - Shiesmine ( talk) 17:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection:. Persistent vandalism and unsourced or poorly content with adding the ethnic origin of her father. - Shiesmine ( talk) Shiesmine ( talk) 17:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
04 February 2017
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon ( talk) 21:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kazaro ( talk) 21:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection for unregistered users. Kazaro ( talk) 21:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit ( talk) 19:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: frequent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Previous semi- was for one month--TFD is far more persistent than that. -- Finngall talk 20:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 ( talk) 20:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection IPs have been changing this person's name and year of birth for months, but lately they are very insistent about it. Debresser ( talk) 16:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued edit warring, see history. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. - Shiesmine ( talk) 18:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A different Rob Stewart has passed away, extra traffic and error editing regarding the death on this wrong article. Home Lander ( talk) 19:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Combined template for {{ subst:unsigned}} and {{ subst:unsigned IP}}. 95.49.248.248 ( talk) 14:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
15:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, disruptive and unsourced IP edits. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:60BD:C922:C388:1C22 ( talk) 15:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Shiesmine (
talk)
18:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Shiesmine, you forgot to protect the page. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 18:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Shiesmine: Can you retract the supposed "update"? The page is not yet protected. Let's have an administrator handle this. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
20:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced tweaking of details from IP addresses. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
20:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 18:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- IP editors, likely socks of blocked editor, are posting on this talkpage, and have been reverted many times now. Debresser ( talk) 17:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
17:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: PC is the standard for articles of famous entertainers. Semi is too much here and prevents IPs for making useful contributions, especially seeing as the article is filled with expand section tags. 110.147.143.16 ( talk) 01:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Since when was that the standard for "famous entertainers"?
FWIW, similar article GradeAUnderA is also semi'd...That page was deleted as per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GradeAUnderA_(2nd_nomination)... 172.58.40.192 ( talk) 02:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)- Random example: Jordan Maron. 49.197.26.150 ( talk) 07:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Creation protection requested for repeatedly recreated page. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
RHaworth.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
14:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hollyckuhno ( talk) 14:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
15:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi is probably justified here: nothing constructive coming from IPs, and vandalism is quite frequent. . Vanamonde ( talk) 14:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
15:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 09:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Yes, but a long time ago!
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 09:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined As above: this was ten years ago.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Winner 42 Talk to me! 12:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive and promotional editing. The topic doesn't usually require much editing as it's about a magazine and an annual ranking list. - The Magnificentist 16:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive changes to the infobox map by IPs; seem to be aimed at bigging up (forgive the expression) the Empire and being rude to editors who disagree. There is a map agreed to on the talk page; perhaps temporarily being unable to change it would encourage the IP(s) to discuss the question. Happy days, Lindsay Hello 09:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated change of name in the lead and infobox. The article was move protected as it was constantly moved to names against naming conventions, but the edits haven't stopped yet. Please semi this page indefinitely. . — LeoFrank Talk 10:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's not jump to indef just yet.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Winner 42 Talk to me! 12:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked the registered account, for good measure.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent edits from different IPs pushing various aspects of POV. Ymblanter ( talk) 08:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
08:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 09:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute. IPs remove current sourced info and add some stuff which need to be reviewed. Needs to reach a consensus on talk page. . Wario-Man ( talk) 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection would give one side of the dispute an advantage, and is therefore not used in content disputes. Sort it out on the talk page, please.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 09:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppetry related to an LTA case over the last month. The whole month's history has pretty much been sock edits, reverts, repeat. Please semi-protect for at least a couple weeks. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
CambridgeBayWeather: Could you explain this? There's been ongoing abuse for a month. ~
Rob13
Talk
02:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- BU Rob13 There doesn't appear to be a lot of editing on any given day that is reverted. Could go with pending changes. If another admin thinks differently I have no problem with them protecting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I concur with
CambridgeBayWeather. This is extremely slow vandalism, imho not even enough for pending changes protection. As we would have said in olden times: just watchlist and revert.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to disagree. This is certainly not at the extreme of slowness in terms of disruption; in fact, the editing rate of the article (~50 edits per month) is enough, in my view, for some form of protection, and Rob is correct that there has been a long-term pattern of disruption identified (namely, addition of unsourced content). A case with a similar issue and editing rate that readily comes to my mind was
Sonic Boom (TV series), back when it was protected with pending changes from May to November 2015. I don't think the pending changes need to last quite as long here, but I think that some duration of protection would be justifiable.
Mz7 (
talk)
15:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm still not convinced. There have been 56 edits and I think 17 reverts. In one case the revert was re-reverted as a good edit. Less that one revert every three days is not a lot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to disagree. This is certainly not at the extreme of slowness in terms of disruption; in fact, the editing rate of the article (~50 edits per month) is enough, in my view, for some form of protection, and Rob is correct that there has been a long-term pattern of disruption identified (namely, addition of unsourced content). A case with a similar issue and editing rate that readily comes to my mind was
Sonic Boom (TV series), back when it was protected with pending changes from May to November 2015. I don't think the pending changes need to last quite as long here, but I think that some duration of protection would be justifiable.
Mz7 (
talk)
15:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
CambridgeBayWeather: Could you explain this? There's been ongoing abuse for a month. ~
Rob13
Talk
02:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Picked up in the last day or so.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from unconfirmed users and IP addresses. No surprise, when a new tour starts, unconfirmed users and IP addresses are making unsourced edits. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 06:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is that possible to have the protection a lot longer, like until June 18, 2017? I've had experience where one a page gets unprotected during a tour happening, IP addresses will immediately rush to claim it's "sold out" when a source has yet to be confirmed those "numbers". Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 07:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Lower protection: I want to create the page as a redirect to Kyode language. The person who protected the page is no longer an administrator. Therefore, I would ask that the page be reincarnated as a different page. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Lower protection: Also, I want to create the page as a redirect to Dead Hot Workshop. The person who protected the page is no longer an administrator. Therefore, I would ask that the page be reincarnated as a different page. George Ho ( talk) 03:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost as soon as previous protection expired the LTA IPs started vandalising the vital statistics of the wrestler. Dr. K. 03:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost as soon as previous protection expired the LTA IPs started vandalising the vital statistics of the wrestler. Dr. K. 03:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in United States and other sections by anonymous editors due to recent events at Berkeley. Moreover, the paragraph being vandalized doesn't belong in this article in the first place, and was clearly added in bad faith. There were also a couple issues with plagiarism/copyright violation. IgnominiousIbex ( talk) 03:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition by IPs of excessively long quotes. : Noyster (talk), 21:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Honestly, pending changes isn't enough, as vandal edits are still occurring frequently. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 00:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Oshwah.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – hateful words from the unconfirmed users. Kazaro ( talk) 02:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost as soon as previous protection expired the LTA IPs started vandalising the vital statistics of the wrestler. Dr. K. 03:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req 3 month semi-protection. Pending changes protection wouldn't really work, because reviewers would have to have an understanding of the problem to deal with the matter. Agenda-pushing after recent expiration of protection, for instance here and here and here.
It's a long story that requires an understanding of corruption in Indian film finances, but basically the producer was pushing some super-high gross figures, some sources called the figures fake, but die-hard fans/marketing teams are pushing these high numbers as incontrovertible fact. There may also be some ethnic pride issues here, since this is a Tamil film, and I'm sure Tamilians want to feel like they knocked one out of the park. Anyway, page protection is probably the only way to manage this, and if I hadn't participated in many of the discussions about this, I'd protect it myself. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an ongoing content dispute between Wikipedians and numerous Ontario-based IPs since O'Leary is a potential political candidate. I'd like to see one month of PC1 to allow discussion to reign over edit warring. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much editing for PC.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection - IP vandalism to a BLP removing cited facts & changing wording to falsely negatively portray the subject. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 20:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs inputting unsourced info about a new look. . AxG / ✉ 16:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Full-fledged edit war in progress over the Bowling Green Massacre, with editors deleting references to properly cited events claiming that they never happened. The full Bowling Green Massacre article has already been protected. Stephen Hui ( talk) 16:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal is causing disruption. Can we semi-protect for a short period of time, even 1 day?. — hike395 ( talk) 17:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Information in this article has been removed 9 times by an IP editor and three new SPA editors. Request page protection for the duration of the AfD discussion.
Exemplo347 (
talk)
17:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Never mind. Article deleted. Exemplo347 ( talk) 00:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor
Mz7 (
talk)
01:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 02:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.192 ( talk) 02:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mz7 (
talk)
03:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Now Already protected by administrator
MelanieN.
Mz7 (
talk)
05:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Now
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. General Ization Talk 05:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bongwarrior.
Materialscientist (
talk)
05:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. General Ization Talk 05:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs keep changing Culver's predecessor and successor. Ueutyi ( talk) 03:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts keep putting "memer" into the article. Binksternet ( talk) 03:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Move protection was lost the last time the page was semi-protected. — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 04:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The page was recently unprotected after a long history of disruptive editing by IP editors and immediately returned to making the same edits.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 17:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Not a heavily edited article, but the vast majority of edits are vandalism by unregistered users, such that good-faith efforts to remove vandalism often catch only part of the problem. No strong opinion on the appropriate length of time, I've never requested page protection before and the issue does not appear recent in origin. Darkmusashi ( talk) 00:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Acroterion
(talk)
02:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There are persistent issues with anonymous editors adding Donald Trump to this template. The main article on facism, on which this template appears, is locked, and this template needs to be locked too. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 01:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Indefinitely semi-protected. I considered template editor protection, and that might end up being needed, but let's see how semi-protection works. Acroterion (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. (for the bot).
George Ho (
talk)
02:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent issues with anonymous editors adding Donald Trump. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 02:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Indefinitely semi-protected. I considered template editor protection, and that might end up being needed, but let's see how semi-protection works. Acroterion (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. (for the bot).
George Ho (
talk)
02:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Protected to promote compliance with the biographies of living persons policy Margor.88 ( talk) 15:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mz7 (
talk)
15:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of reliably sourced content by IP editors since the beginning of the month. I think it's a WP:Meatpuppet situation going on, because it's different IP addresses, but they all do the exact same edit.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ 3family6: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Increased protection level: Some blanking and good faith edits has been going on in this template. It also transcluded onto pages such as Cabinet of Donald Trump and Formation of Donald Trump's cabinet which are protected. This means those protected pages could be edit via the backdoor. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BilCat ( talk) 18:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. 172.58.40.192 ( talk) 18:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 20:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. a few days by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
23:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
05 February 2017
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and flagrant BLP violations for the same reason as before. Perhaps an indef semi might do the trick here. Blake Gripling ( talk) 13:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. One such edit since end of last protection (27 November 2016) does not warrant protection.
So
Why
13:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs | ✉) 16:44, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Please re-report if vandalism picks up again.
Mz7 (
talk)
17:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP vandalism by various IP users. Requesting indef because vandalism continued within a day when the last protection was over. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 20:00, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We will reevaluate and extend if necessary in March.
Mz7 (
talk)
21:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sro's talk page is being trolled again. The IP has been reported to AIV but, as so often happens, they may start IP hopping after a block so a few hours protection will stop them for a time. MarnetteD| Talk 05:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. No more disruption since then. Please rereport if it starts again.
So
Why
13:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: Frequent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Vandalism resumed shortly after the expiration of the most recent 3 month semi. -- Finngall talk 10:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
2001:8003:2568:c00:75f5:9d71:9f34:585b (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Widr. No more disruption since then. Rereport if it continues.
So
Why
13:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
So
Why
13:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content reverted many times. High vandalism. only_nonsense ( talk) 10:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
10:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Some reverted edits were vandalism recently. -- George Ho ( talk) 10:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
10:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article suffers frequent anon IP vandalism, a waste of editor resources. Montanabw (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
13:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently announced Islanders will be switching stadiums, so dates change to 2018. 2018 != present though, so it should stay as is. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 11:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Four reverts in a week is not enough since the protection policy says that semi-protection should only be applied when handling the users in question is not an option.
So
Why
13:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing, and adding of unsourced content - compounded by the fact that the topic of the page is controversial. The page needs to be protected. . Tiger7253 ( talk) 12:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
13:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ignoring WP:BRD, WP:WAR, no edit summaries/no explanation, not reacting on talk page comments. Clear WP:SPA concerns. - . LouisAragon ( talk) 12:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
So
Why
13:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and unnecessary edits due to her controversial views as a unique politician. Please make extended confirmed to ensure that page is null of potential unnecessary and derogatory information in the future. Bear030702 ( talk) 23:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 07:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just a single editor making some, probably good-faith, changes who has not even been warned. Insufficient reason to assume that this article falls within the scope of the ArbCom ruling. The ruling also notes that such protection should not be used when not feasible and here dealing with the single user is a much easier way to fix it. Protection can be requested again iff this changes.
So
Why
09:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has encountered a lot of vandalism in January 2017. . FriyMan talk 08:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
09:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been the subject of a large amount of Copy vio. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 04:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined @
Zackmann08: User in question is autoconfirmed; warn them, and if they don't stop, send them to AIV. I've rev-deld the copyvios.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.214 ( talk) 05:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
09:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 10:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi is probably justified here: nothing constructive coming from IPs, and vandalism is quite frequent.
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, the article never existed.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and the intentional harm to the appearance of this article. link link link link link link link link link Mehmedsons ( talk) 17:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Mehmedsons: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6 spammers. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Things have quieted down for a few hours after the blocks were issued. Re-report if activity picks up again.
Mz7 (
talk)
03:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page is being attacked by an anonymous IP-hopping vandal. Perhaps semi-protection will cool the vandal's inane jets.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 04:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism attacks. Sirkablaam Talk 05:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
06:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Lower to semi-protection: Nominations for the show have been offically announced (the host, venue and date are also out in the open), so there's no longer a concern of the entire show being made-up out of whole cloth, though semi-protection should be retained so the usual vandalizing IPs have no chance to throw false nominations or ceremony information in. Nate • ( chatter) 04:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question:
Mrschimpf have you asked
Jo-Jo Eumerus. Why not update the draft and it can then be moved back.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
07:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, vandalism and yet more vandalism. A lot of it is gaming/game teams related, incl. some subtler stuff. (Most of it is quite blatant, however) ~20 counts of vandalism in less than an hour. AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 03:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
03:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 21:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – removing person, and also distructive editing and putting unsourced things. Kazaro ( talk) 21:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me ( talk ⋅ contribs) 21:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism and dispute edit warring over her father's ethnic origin. Shiesmine ( talk) 18:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- {{subst:RFPP/sandbox|ec|indefinite}}.
Shiesmine (
talk)
18:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Shiesmine: Can you retract the supposed "update"? The page is not yet protected. Let's have an administrator handle this. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Shiesmine: The {{
RFPP}} template is for use by the administrators who respond to this board to identify which requests have already been handled. Please do not add this template in yourself, as it may confuse administrators into thinking your request has already been handled, when it has not. I have deactivated the template by surrounding it with
nowikitags. Mz7 ( talk) 20:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. If you have a dispute regarding the content in the article, I would bring it up on the
article's talk page.
Mz7 (
talk)
20:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – adding unsourced conctent, and adding hate speech movie tittle from the unregistered users. Kazaro ( talk) 21:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kazaro ( talk) 21:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 21:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 21:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalized by multiple accounts in short period of time. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a long-term pattern of IP editors claiming that he has died and I am getting fed up with checking the news each time to check that it isn't true. I am not sure why this article is repeatedly targeted. He is hardly the sort of person who you would expect random IPs to have a grudge against. DanielRigal ( talk) 22:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
06 February 2017
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 20:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: The article is being brigaded by individuals from the subreddit, as seen here. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 21:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 18:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long protection log, just came off a 2 year semiprotection and vandalism has resumed. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a long term problem.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent . ToolWiki23 ( talk) 11:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Did you nominate the correct page? There is no vandalism at all....
Lectonar (
talk)
11:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 14:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after recent protection. Qed237 (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from vandal ips for a month, some of whom are now also creating WP:single_purpose accounts for the sake of vandalizing the page.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 16:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and BLP violations, insertions of insults and profanity in Bengali. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multi-vector IP vandalism, following Atlanta Falcons loss at Superbowl LI. Recommend a week until things settle down and the recentism wears off. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subjected to various IP vandalism attacks. Please check the details [6], [7], [8]. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
15:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced materials and POV. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 15:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. so that a meaningful discussion can take place over the content. I don't understand the subject matter well enough to make a judgement on the validity of the new account's contributions - please talk this through with them. If they are non-responsive or fail to be
civil in their responses let me know --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
15:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistence of vandalism, mostly targeting the actual team, calling them 'trash', 'garbage', 'terrible', etc.,. UNSC Luke 1021 ( talk) 15:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
15:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: regular IP vandalism. LibStar ( talk) 09:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued block evasion of Nipponese Dog Calvero. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued block evasion of Nipponese Dog Calvero. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Seth MacFarlane ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 02:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Main perpetrator blocked for block evasion.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 13:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued block evasion of Nipponese Dog Calvero . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes does not work on category pages.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolling on adding infoboxes without consensus and edit warring. JAG UAR 23:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Like the Nissan Armada article, similar occurring patterns of vandalism have taken place since the second half of 2016 and will not stop, as long as the offending person keeps logging through unregistered IP addresses. Carmaker1 ( talk) 23:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 23:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. WNYY98 ( talk) 06:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aloha27 talk 16:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Essentially it's just one IP and one user, so if there is disruption, better to report to AiV.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 20:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – For the past 12 months, various unregistered users through I.P. addresses have been abusing the privilege to edit this article by tampering with dates for unknown reasons. It is getting to be too much effort to continually "fix" their edits. Carmaker1 ( talk) 22:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. And why full protection?
Lectonar (
talk)
08:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent additions of an actor who has not been confirmed to appear via reliable sources. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting indefinite protection. Vandalism from multiple IP editors over a long time period. Tom (LT) 09:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too slow for (permanent) semi-protection. Let's see how pending changes works.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP editors over a prolonged period. Tom (LT) 09:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too slow for (permanent) semi-protection. Let's see how pending changes works.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Please leave this line alone (Help desk heading) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – So that template editors may edit the page. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done Downgraded to template editor protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced, unexplained changes to the list. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. General Ization Talk 01:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Datbubblegumdoe talk – contribs 07:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced genre by Spain-based (ever shifting) IP (88.24.96.189, 84.77.193.226, 83.32.96.91, 84.77.193.226), properly warned on every revert. Arrival of new IP6 with same edit. - DVdm ( talk) 07:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is rather too slow for semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 02:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Coffee.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent long-term socking, with 7 failed attempts at stopping the socking using temporary semi-protection. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 06:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Favonian.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Recently deleted BLP. WNYY98 ( talk) 07:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User, with changing IPs, only makes edits to this talk page solely to change my signature into a vulgar name. Both a rangeblock and an edit filter to fix this have been declined; maybe page protection may help?. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
JudgeRM: Declined. The problem I have with protection is that it would prevent anyone using this IP address from responding to concerns on their talk page in the event that it happens later on. As an alternative solution, since it seems that the warnings are stale and they're not doing much good for the encyclopedia as harm, I've gone ahead and blanked the page.
Mz7 (
talk)
22:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- I mean, I guess that works too. JudgeRM (talk to me) 22:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent IP and nonautoconfirmed anti-Semitic vandalism, promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, or concealing real anti-Semitism that the family has been the victim of. Family has many living members so BLP applies. . DuncanHill ( talk) 01:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism due to Super Bowl play. Lizard ( talk) 02:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is getting heavy traffic following White's big performance in the Super Bowl. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 04:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High risk of irrelevant and unnecessary edits by mainly uneducated Pakistani fans. Darmanbacha162 ( talk) 16:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Mz7 (
talk)
18:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP edits with a clear conflict of interest, adding statements that violate NPOV and claims that are not in the references given. See talk page and version history. mfb ( talk) 17:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mz7 (
talk)
19:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant removal of artwork cover by the same person using different IP addresses. — Calvin999 21:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
22:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 22:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
22:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
07 February 2017
Temporary Semi-protection: This will most likely go stale or otherwise, but there was a recent edit war going on that resulted on administrator intervention, two blocks and a discussion on WP:MILHIST. Requesting semi protection so the situation can resolve and the edit war ceases to occur. UNSC Luke 1021 ( talk) 16:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Senor Freebie (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Ad Orientem. Semi would do nothing in this case.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 3 months, due to an astounding amount of vandalism.
EdJohnston (
talk)
21:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There is persistent, long-term, disruptive editing on this infrequently edited BLP. Various IP editors consistently try to change his nationality to "Serbian" instead of "Croatian" in the lead. Attempts to dissuade this behavior by myself and others via edit summary don't appear to be effective, as different IP editors appear to show up and make the same change. I'm asking for Pending Changes to protect this BLP. This is a sensitive subject and arguably protected by sanctions on subjects related to Eastern Europe, broadly construed. AlexEng( TALK) 20:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 1 year. Disputes about ethnicity in former Yugoslavia do fall under
WP:ARBMAC.
EdJohnston (
talk)
20:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Protection should be changed from regular to ECP Arbcom, American politics. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I'm not seeing enough sustained disruptive editing to justify such extreme protection. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
I may however post a reminder that discretionary sanctions apply.Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)- I see that has already been done. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Visible in opening sentences of 140+ pages. George Ho ( talk) 11:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Actually recreated just once, so not repeatedly.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – User IP does not conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed and is indulging in disruptive editing across multiple pages including this one. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 18:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
19:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stikkyy ( talk) 06:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently confirmed and extremely controversial Secretary of Education was recently elected, prompting much vandalism from IPs making puns about her name and otherwise. Requesting indefinite as this goes on for a while, as seen on other 2016 election related pages. UNSC Luke 1021 ( talk) 18:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
19:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by an IP user 80.136.... (6 accounts, not ducking, but clearly violating 3RR and edit-warring, details at SPI here).
80.136... clearly knows and understands WP policies but gave up on seeking consensus on the Talk Page and resorted to just EWing on the page, which is now a major disruption. JesseRafe ( talk) 17:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism for years by banned user comming back with different names. This user tends to wait for protection to expire and vandalizes this particular page (same content) violating several wikipedia policies. The user was previously known and wipeouting, academiava, Premakeer (current user name) and other multiple usernames giving admins unnecessary load of work. Please apply protection for another year. Ramya20 ( talk) 17:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 17:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Because of recent developments in the Sexual Assault case at the school there have been lots of edit wars and I fear that without protection this article will become a disaster. Snood1205 ( talk) 17:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: unprotect right now so I can add that Caillou likes Chuck E Cheeses and he gets grounded all the time. This is the second time I requested this to happen because we need to talk about the episodes on YouTube!
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
13:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Move protection: User:Evangp consistently reverts title moves with little to no justification. User has a history of moving articles based upon outdated images and materials. Yet he or she refuses to provide current/recent sources to support the move. Based upon the user's history, I strongly feel reasoning will be ignored and the user will consistently revent page move back to his or her desired choice. I have provided several sources to justify the article move within the article, along with social media sites and the official website acknowldgeing the new name. Itsbydesign ( talk) 13:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Move protected for a period of 6 monts, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Impressive discussion on the talk page about the correct name.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 15:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Insertions of unverified speculation. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 16:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Clueless disruptive editing from autoconfirmed user: removal of sourced content, tangential talk page posts, original research of a non-neutral nature. Additionally, resumption of IP disruption upon expiry of previous protection. . Vanamonde ( talk) 12:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Vanamonde93: The IP disruption is very low level and
these edits by a new account look like improvements to me. I can see there is an issue with one auto-confirmed user who has a poor grasp of both English and the the norms of Wikipedia. I don't think page protection is the solution though. I have left a message on the user's talk page. If that doesn't work, dispute resolution or
WP:ANI may be more appropriate.
Yaris678 (
talk)
14:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Yaris678: a priori I can see why it seems that way; but I'm afraid this is one of those areas (similar to hot topics in U.S. politics) that attracts a large number of clueless POV pushing. This is just the most recent edition of it; and poor english is not the only issue. I call it "disruptive" because the editor removes sources, and claims to be removing unsourced content. I would ask that you take one closer look at the page history. I will, of course, do my best to communicate with this user. Regards,
Vanamonde (
talk)
14:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. Actually, never mind: Regentspark protected it fully.
Vanamonde (
talk)
15:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK. Probably the most sensible option for a protection - some of the editors were extended confirmed. Hopefully all parties will now go to the talk page. Yaris678 ( talk) 16:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Yaris678: a priori I can see why it seems that way; but I'm afraid this is one of those areas (similar to hot topics in U.S. politics) that attracts a large number of clueless POV pushing. This is just the most recent edition of it; and poor english is not the only issue. I call it "disruptive" because the editor removes sources, and claims to be removing unsourced content. I would ask that you take one closer look at the page history. I will, of course, do my best to communicate with this user. Regards,
Vanamonde (
talk)
14:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Technical support scammers are changing the nature of the article to suit their scam. The same problem caused the need for semi protection last year - see page history and page protection log. Deli nk ( talk) 12:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
15:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Eight IP vandalisms within the past week. FoxSerfaty ( talk) 13:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vivexdino ( talk) 08:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
full protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nivkrish ( talk) 09:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User IP refuses to conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed consensus and continues with disruptive edits. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 13:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Vanamonde93.
NeilN
talk to me
15:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user refuses to conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed and continues with persistent disruption using VPN. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 14:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Vanamonde93.
NeilN
talk to me
15:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Full Protection Persistent, Daily and Long Term vandalism and inappropriate reversion by editor
I urgently request that write protection be put back in place for the article on “The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina” and that poster “Strgzr1” be prohibited from any further editing of the article. It is a conflict of interest for this person to be editing the article first because he is a VMI grad with questionable motives and second because he has a long history of posting false, demeaning and misleading information and comments. Look at the edit history and you can see a long trail of changes and edits he has made that are questionable and for which he has been called out on by other editors including “BillCasey”. Now it appears that this person has also had himself made an editor just so he can revert any edits I make to his false narratives; also not in the edit history that recently when I revert his vandalism he then reverts my changes and also retaliates by adding even more misleading, false and demeaning comments to the article – under motto, “strikingly similar to the motto of West Point”; under cadet life “cadets who complete 4 years may choose to live off campus” (false). This person is well known to me since he for years has also been making false claims and posting inaccurate and derogatory comments on another website, I know its him because some of his comments on the wiki talk pages are almost verbatim from those on the other website. This vandalism began occurring routinely about 2 years ago so I requested write protection which was granted, a few months ago for some unknown reason the protection was removed and the vandalism immediately started up again, note in the comments on the talk page that ‘Strgzr1’ actually admits he is the one doing it. Enough is enough, he has been vandalizing this article for far too long and clearly has ulterior motives, he clearly has some deep seated hatred of The Citadel and is using the internet to play some kind of sick game. Please put a stop to this at once. Bob80q ( talk) 15:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protected to stop the drive-by IP edits.
Bob80q, please read
WP:NOTVAND and use the talk page which hasn't been touched in months.
NeilN
talk to me
15:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- No point in using the talk page, quite clear by now that Strgzr1 is intent on continuing his long history of disruptive and false posts; I know this person well enough to understand he cant be reasoned with, just a classless ass playing a sick game due to some unknown personal vendetta. His history should be justification for removing him as a wiki editor. Bob80q ( talk) 18:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. Very visible in opening sentences of 2000+ pages. George Ho ( talk) 10:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. This is an increase in the edit protection but a decrease in the move protection. Template protection didn't exist at the time the protection was last changed for this template and I think this makes sense now.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The addition of unsourced content will continue until the event, unless the page is semi-protected for 3 months. Nickag989 talk 11:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism as soon as the page was unprotected earlier today. Snowflake91 ( talk) 12:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've no problem extending any protection applied by Vanamonde93 :)
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Elito Circa ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection:' Persistent disruptive editing – Edit Wars and persistent Vandalism of the content, requesting to be semi-protected for 1 month. Wakowako ( talk)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
12:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: Frequent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Vandalism resumed shortly after the expiration of the previous three-month semi-. -- Finngall talk 04:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. One edit. Give it a few days and see if it is still a problem.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the History. There has been Consent Vandalism on this page. As this is considered one of WWE's past Championships. This page should be considered important and have only those with auto comfirm priveleges and above can edit the page. Nhajivandi ( talk) 05:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Visible in 300+ pages, especially at opening sentences. The Freddie Mercury bio uses it. George Ho ( talk) 09:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event, vandalism is rife, constantly being blanked and replaced with rubbish. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 09:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The protection should be restored (or done). It was somehow deleted but then restored, affecting the protection. Also visible in opening sentences. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected I also restored the history.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: This article was protected back in 2009 for "anonymous prancing around in progress". Well, I'm pretty sure that this "prancing" has stopped, and I don't see any reason for this page to continue to be protected about 8 years later (unless I'm mistaken or missed something). JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Dbachmann Is still around; let's see what they think.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected I have watchlisted, so we'll just see.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism . A picture of a dead fish ( talk) 03:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Please report to
WP:AIV if the vandalism continues, or re-report here if there are multiple IPs involved. Thanks,
Mz7 (
talk)
05:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia Articles relating to the number 666
- 666 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 666 (number) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Number of the Beast ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending-changes-protection: Vandalism. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 08:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- All
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
09:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Visible in 200+ pages, especially at opening sentences. George Ho ( talk) 09:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
09:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 06:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: Frequent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal--has been vandalized by five different TFD IPs since the expiration of the most recent three-month semi-. -- Finngall talk 06:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
08:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stikkyy ( talk) 06:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
08:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection:' Persistent vandalism by IP hopper. 1) 103.250.143.211, 2) 61.152.255.24, 3) 61.152.255.6, and now 4) 211.144.126.163 Jim1138 ( talk) 07:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
08:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring on an article under discretionary sanctions with the "consensus required" restriction. Please consider also sanctioning individual editors as an AE action. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I would not fully protect here for now, as I think that the back-and-forth in the article has died down more or less. Discussion on the talk-page is ongoing..... If another admin wants to protect, go ahead.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined see
my comment at
WP:ANEW for more information. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
01:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 IP sockpuppet. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
05:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: User has been deceased since 2008. (See Sheldon Brown (bicycle mechanic): This editor is the subject of this article.) Usually, the standard is to fully protect a deceased editor's user page, but since their user page doesn't exist and never has existed, I suppose the standard here would be either creation protection ... or creating a redirect to the editor's talk page, then fully protecting that redirect. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected indefinitely. redirected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Currently subject of very advanced trade talks that will likely result in WP:CRYSTAL violations . WNYY98 ( talk) 22:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding names of various politicians . A picture of a dead fish ( talk) 23:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. Do resubmit if further vandalism occurs though.
Tabercil (
talk)
23:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent news in Australia is being misrepresented in edits by IPs making POV changes. Flat Out ( talk) 00:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism as soon as semi expired; current livestream relating to enwiki. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs) 02:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
02:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing plot vandalism by socks. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 03:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
03:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1991 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1992 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1993 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1994 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1995 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1996 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1997 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Wikipedians born in 1998 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: No more need to protect, people born in 1991-1998 are no longer minors. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 21:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
02:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.186 ( talk) 23:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined for now - page gets hit once a week or so and has plenty of watchers.
Alexius
Horatius
01:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
AlexiusHoratius: Would you consider pending changes protection, then...?
172.58.40.186 (
talk)
02:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok.
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok.
- @
AlexiusHoratius: Would you consider pending changes protection, then...?
172.58.40.186 (
talk)
02:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 ( talk) 01:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
02:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent edit-warring and sockpuppetry by blocked user. Wolbo ( talk) 02:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
02:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: unprotect right now so I can add that Caillou likes Chuck E Cheeses and he gets grounded all the time.
- Declined. No, the page is protected just so as not to have overly trivial facts added.
Bishonen |
talk
21:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued block evasion of Nipponese Dog Calvero. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Arbitration enforcement.
Yaris678 (
talk)
15:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making changes to reflect recent news in Australia, but misrepresenting sources and adding location specific edits to International article lead. Flat Out ( talk) 00:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Vicks VapoRub ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: This page is being vandalized by multiple users and IP addresses. Protect it for a while please. The Channel of Random ( talk) 01:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ The Channel of Random: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- I have fixed the request. —
MRD2014 (
talk •
contribs)
01:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 18:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Home Lander ( talk) 22:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism . Quasar G. ( talk) 23:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page sees constant persistent vandalism from vandal ips on a daily basis, often with deliberately misleading edit summaries. Semi-protection would cut the rate of vandalism by 90%-- Mr Fink ( talk) 23:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: Editor is insisting on re-inserting links while multiple ongoing discussions, but without having consensus for inclusion. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 15:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Edit warring user blocked. If this persists report to 3RR noticeboard. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 22:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anonymous user is edit-warring to restore vast amounts of text that is unsourced or poorly sourced (e.g. sourced only to online forums), contains links to copyright-infringing YouTube videos or goes into absurd levels of descriptive detail. The article has been in this bloated state for years and is tagged accordingly. Blocking is futile as the user simply hops from one IP address to the next. The PC protection that I imposed two months ago has been largely ineffective as many reviewers are simply waving these problematic edits through. The article already has a fairly extensive protection log. I would re-impose semi-protection for a few months but I'm probably too involved now. Super Mario Man– Talk 00:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: For two days, anon IPs have been vandalizing this comedian's page by adding references to dentists and dentistry. Ha ha, very funny. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
08 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Won election for the highest office in the country. βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 16:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
5 albert square (
talk)
21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual removal of references by ip users or possibly IP hopping user. Andrewgprout ( talk) 17:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's not vandalism, the IPs disagree on whether the source is required, thus it's
edit-warring and if the protection does not force you to discuss it, you will likely all be blocked next. Regards
So
Why
21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Needs WP:SALTed. Repeatedly recreated. . Avic ennasis @ 21:36, 12 Shevat 5777 / 21:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done, salted. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
21:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There has been a sudden spike in disruptive IP editors accusing all who disagree with them of being uncivil and carrying on about long debunked arguments after several popular articles drawing the attention of pro-acupuncturist to WP: [9], [10] and [11]. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question:
MjolnirPants Was that the talk page or the article?
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ CambridgeBayWeather: The talk is where the disruption is occurring right now. I'm hesitant to suggest also including the main page because the new spate of POV pushing isn't really turning into edit wars there, just a highly disruptive presence at talk. That being said, I'd prefer to see both semi-d for a week. It would give this time to die down, and it wouldn't encourage IPs and new SPA's to try to push their POV at the article when they can't edit the talk page. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined For now...talk-page hasn't been used since yesterday....talk-pages should only be protected as a last resort anyway, and then only for short periods.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Given the nature of WP discussions, I hardly think a pause of a few hours can be read as an end to the disruption, but I'll wait until it (almost inevitably) picks back up again. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Restore to original protection level. 219.79.250.146 ( talk) 13:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined ask the protecting admin first.
So
Why
13:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP's are currently vandalizing this BLP. -- DynaGirl ( talk) 16:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
18:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: POV edits made by IP, not backed up by content of cited source. IP is unwilling to discuss on Talk page. Bazonka ( talk) 11:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- The IP has now attempted to discuss the situation, but wiped the existing content of the talk page in the process. (I've now reinstated the previous content and added the new thread at the bottom of the page.) The IP's "discussion" essentially boils down to "I'm from Oman so I know better than you", which is not constructive. And I've just noticed that the talk page has been wiped again... Bazonka ( talk) 11:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. by
Oshwah (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
So
Why
13:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A user/s hopping across different IPs repeatedly makes vandalism under the guise of "adding a fact". Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 11:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
13:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent anonymous vandalism. — Mjbmr ( talk) 12:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
So
Why
13:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced fluff claiming that the province will be incorporated as part of Metro Manila. Blake Gripling ( talk) 12:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
13:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by User talk:Wikimoneya, who repeatedly renamed the Penang State Stadium into the grammatically wrong 'State of Penang Stadium'. Vnonymous 04:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Protection is not for cases where blocking a user would be feasible.
So
Why
13:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All edits by new users were unconstructive and reverted per its history this past few months. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 10:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
13:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
5 albert square.
So
Why
16:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Presistant vandalism. Even semi-protection for 2 years does not have much effect on stopping the vandalism. Better to have indef semi-protection rather than another 3-year semi-protection. 219.79.250.146 ( talk) 13:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.
So
Why
13:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from sock. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vaibhav Kasyap is back - this time he is adding Vaibhav (Kasyap) possibly to avoid a spam filter put in place to stop his vandalism . Kellymoat ( talk) 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Can we get a few days of no moves on this article? It's been moved without discussion twice. I opened a discussion on the talk page and informed some wikiprojects for some input. Thanks. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 06:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
13:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constantly vandalized by a newly registered single-purpose accounts and IPs. Snowflake91 ( talk) 09:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
13:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 11:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
13:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent POV edits made by IP, not backed up by the content of the cited sources. The IP has been unwilling to discuss it on the talk page or provide edit summaries. Doremo ( talk) 12:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Protection before Doremo's deleting. The rest of Czechia:
- https://books.google.cz/books?id=vtRWCAAAQBAJ&pg=PT90&lpg=PT90&dq=1939+%22rest+of+czechia%22&source=bl&ots=f7QteebE3j&sig=OLysZuMo5ZPjS1_1yKfTGImFClY&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipi538uoDSAhUkMJoKHdR7D28Q6AEINDAE#v=onepage&q=1939%20%22rest%20of%20czechia%22&f=false
- https://books.google.cz/books?id=U_AvYay7cicC&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=1939+%22rest+of+czechia%22&source=bl&ots=xr0N1Y3chP&sig=F2zivn8o4BvUucsZC2-0coq0cGs&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipi538uoDSAhUkMJoKHdR7D28Q6AEIKjAC#v=onepage&q=1939%20%22rest%20of%20czechia%22&f=false
- https://books.google.cz/books?id=eonqpYqL3BsC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=1939+%22rest+of+czechia%22&source=bl&ots=yvkNKamuAZ&sig=BpKu5VvZhaAVK3Iu4WiiaL9kiNI&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipi538uoDSAhUkMJoKHdR7D28Q6AEIJTAB#v=onepage&q=1939%20%22rest%20of%20czechia%22&f=false
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clearly a content dispute with
edit-warring on both sides. Find consensus on the talk page, lest you will both be blocked for it.
So
Why
13:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing. Page has been semi-protected three times and pending change protected once as of now but issue still persists. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 03:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Slow but steady vandalism over a very long period of time. 172.58.41.93 ( talk) 04:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. We typically need a higher rate of editing to justify protection. Here, there were only 20 or so edits in the entire year of 2016, nine of which were made on December 31.
Mz7 (
talk)
05:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit war with multiple users. Twitbookspacetube ( talk) 07:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Consistent edit-warring and reversion by three SPAs to a BLP page that is under discretionary sanctions. Only one of the SPAs has engaged on the talk page, and the other two accounts have removed content or readded content against talk page consensus. Because two of the SPAs have acheived autoconfirmed status, I think that the best possible option to contain the disruption at this page is ECP that will allow the accounts to request and discuss potential edits on the talk page, without requesting formal sanctions against the accounts themselves. . TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
CambridgeBayWeather.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The Land Before Time
- The Land Before Time ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of The Land Before Time characters ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Land Before Time (franchise) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended Semi-protection: This and other related pages, including List of The Land Before Time characters, and The Land Before Time (franchise) are being repeatedly vandalized by an anonymous vandal abusing multiple IPs in order to insert WP:Original research nonsense, and edit-war to preserve said original research nonsense. Has repeatedly demonstrated no desire to achieve consensus or discuss.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 02:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I've merged the related reports.
Mz7 (
talk)
06:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected all of these (though this seems to be a dispute about the species of dinosaur in a children's tv show, and makes me want to hit my head on a wall :) )
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – 14 days or so until the vandalism and junk edits that spam up the history and PC logs. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 02:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user does not conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed and continues to disruptively edit the article. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 21:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamgerber80 ( talk) please refrain from academic dishonesty and trying to rewrite articles in your favor. The source of information is reputable from China News. Your are trying to pov push and change the original consensus as the article has stated for a very long time that "ROC successfully conducted its diminutive nuclear test in southern Taiwan in the 1980s", please confirm for yourself with China News. http://www.chinanews.com/2000-1-7/26/14868.html
27.100.20.56 ( talk) 21:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 1 year. There is not much reason to apply extended confirmed unless there is activity by registered socks.
EdJohnston (
talk)
03:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconfirmed reports the player is signing a contract, which require passing a physical exam to finalize. So WP:CRYSTAL. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- I second this request. Was about to come here and request it myself, but then saw that it was already done... 172.58.41.93 ( talk) 04:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
05:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.93 ( talk) 05:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Seconded. Lots of changing name in infobox to "The Senate." Lookunder ( talk) 05:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
05:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Judging from the history as well as the talk page, this article has been suffering from repeated vandalism for several years. Mauricio Maluff Masi ( talk) 22:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Gilliam.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism favoring style over content and disregarding the point that reliable references were not being used. — Sunnya343✈ ( háblame • my work) 23:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism favoring style over content and disregarding the point that reliable references were not being used. — Sunnya343✈ ( háblame • my work) 23:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP editor(who is hopping IP's) continues to disrupt the article and violate 3RR. Temporary protection would give everyone a chance to reach a consensus on the Talk page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 00:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
00:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article in question discusses a person dealing with political power conflict. Constantly edited to include defamatory content against several politicians. RoCo (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 00:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
01:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Essentially, a post on their Facebook page where the leader of the group proclaimed "EDIT IT IN ANY HORRIBLE WAY YOU SEE FIT". This is the result of private emails with the subject trying to tell them that their article won't be deleted (in these private emails, they say that the page is slander; after trying to help them, they essentially decided to wage war on us). Sky Warrior 01:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Red Scare ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Persistent vandalism in the form of removing the same sidebar repeatedly over several days. Can we get semi-protection for a week to give the vandal(s) time to go away?-- Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
01:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A week would hopefully be enough. Doug Weller talk 21:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stikkyy ( talk) 22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
23:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello ( talk) 23:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also blocked the latest IP vandal, but this seems to be IP hopping vandalism. Pretty persistent and bad case of it.
— Maile (
talk)
00:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
09 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced genres. If I rv again I'll violate WP:3RR. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 15:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Issued a warning to the user. Feel free to ping me if they continue and I'll look into further action. --
ferret (
talk)
15:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: It's DAB-page, previously semi-protected multiple times. It's a permanent magnet for silly-vandalism. Over 80% of the last 200 edits were either vandalism, or vandalism-reverts. That vandalism rate has been roughly consistent for the entire history of the page. Vandalism&reverts drown out any legitimate edits in the page history. In order to clean up yesterday's vandalism I had to request oversight for the protection of a minor. Alsee ( talk) 18:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. The slow moving but constant vandalism I think warrants long term protection. Short protections won't gain much. If anyone disagrees, feel free to lower duration. --
ferret (
talk)
19:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have constantly vandalized the article (changing singers to older singers), Like with Friday Download these IPs aren't going to go so I'm asking for indef protection, Thanks. – Davey2010 Talk 19:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- You beat me to this
Davey2010 :-) I will add that, since I stumbled on the problem edits, this is at least the third time that protection has been needed to stop the disruptive editing.
MarnetteD|
Talk
19:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Haha sorry :), You'd think this sad bunch would have better things to do than to jot down when the article protection expires and then vandalise it... Sad really. – Davey2010 Talk 19:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- You beat me to this
Davey2010 :-) I will add that, since I stumbled on the problem edits, this is at least the third time that protection has been needed to stop the disruptive editing.
MarnetteD|
Talk
19:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The past 3 month protection expired in November, so we went awhile without the page being hit. However, if anyone else feels indef is warranted, feel free to increase. --
ferret (
talk)
19:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user refuses to conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed and continues to disruptively edit the article. Other articles affected by the same RfC have also been semi-protected because of same behavior. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 14:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 2 vandalism edits after the RfC closed is simply not enough disruption.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User IP refuses to conform to Talk:Hsiung_Feng_III#Closed_RfC_On_Sources.2C_Nukes.2C_and_Speed and continues to disruptively edit the article. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 14:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 1 vandalism edit after the RfC closed is simply not enough disruption.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated blanking of sourced sections from series of related IPs - current IP up to Level 4 but has used 3 others in the last 48 hours, so need to protect the page - Arjayay ( talk) 19:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As soon as protection expires, this page gets vandalized almost weekly. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 14:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Almost weekly....hmm; @Seahorseruler: if you have not done so already, please have a look at
our protection policy .
Lectonar (
talk)
14:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Persistent addition of promotional content. I've nominated this for speedy deletion as a ten-year-old spamicle; at the least, the COI accounts need to be blocked from editing s that objective users can clean this out. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 14:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Protection is not the way to go here. Edting may be with spam- intent, but there are other ways to deal with this instead of locking the page down.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Bear1234509 ( talk) 16:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
16:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 17:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
17:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a vandal using a floating IP. 331dot ( talk) 17:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
17:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 15:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
16:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This guy is in the news now, it should be protected until things die down. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be plenty of time for the news cycle to find something else.
So
Why
16:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring. Karst ( talk) 18:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring. QuackGuru ( talk) 21:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.199 ( talk) 10:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Goodnightmush
Talk
01:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not all of the users are blocked. They come back almost daily. 2602:306:3357:BA0:CC96:1326:B338:F16F ( talk) 03:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. Rereport if they do but currently it looks like a short spike in vandalism in the last two days that stopped after the block.
So
Why
10:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we have five days of {{ pp-vandalism}} on top of the {{ pp-move-vandalism}} so we don't have to deal with the IPs and SPAs during AfD? Thanks. . — Sam Sailor 14:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally I would be loath to protect articles which are being discussed at AfD, but this is purely disruptive.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has seen unsourced edits regarding Kashmir. Semi-protected from 4 Jan to 4 Feb, but the edit-warring started as soon as the semi-protection lifted. I think we have no choice but to extend indefinitely. Kautilya3 ( talk) 14:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not that many disruptive edits since last protection lifted, but a good use for pending changes protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 11:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined per
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 it would be more feasible to warn/block the lone editor.
So
Why
13:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ SoWhy:The editor was already warned but the article should be protected like any other article in the area per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30.There is no reason not to protect as it can't be edited by not qualifying users-- Shrike ( talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: @Shrike: and has the editor in question been reported? As
SoWhy said: it is easier to block one offending user instead of locking the whole page down.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- If arbcom says to do it then you must do it. 2602:306:3357:BA0:CC96:1326:B338:F16F ( talk) 03:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. They don't say we must do it, they say we can do it but we can also use other methods.
Move along now, nothing more to see.
So
Why
07:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalised since protection was removed, please protect for longer. JMHamo ( talk) 10:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing IP running jokes that this British "rightwing agenda" talk show host starred in Diff'rent Strokes. All IP edits on this low-traffic article in the past year have been to add or revert BLP vandalism. McGeddon ( talk) 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Autoconfirmed users are adding original research, so semi-protection isn't enough. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 21:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ever-persisent BLP violations by a 180.xx IP who adds the same content every time the article comes off protection, which is twice now. Needs to be many months—maybe until June. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 22:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I've instituted a rangeblock on the appropriate IP addresses, so page protection is not needed. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
indefinite full protection: Persistent edit wars and consistent lack of proper sourcing. The article goes back and forth towards skewing the bias for and then starkly against the technology. Requesting protection to balance the reputation of the technology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azar8991 ( talk • contribs) 23:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 01:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 01:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kazaro ( talk) 01:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: This has not happened yet, but there is a huge discussion going on that could boil down to a massive edit war. With the best interest of both the article and the belligerents, I am requesting a temporary yet effective full protection to let this die down. This might seem like an over-the-top request but I feel it's the only thing preventing a massive edit war without users being blocked for extensive periods of time. One to two weeks seems like more than enough time to resolve any conflict. UNSC Luke 1021 ( talk) 01:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per template documentation, the season end date should remain as present until the final episode of the season has aired. The final episode for this season has not aired, and despite a hidden note explicitly stating not to change it, users keep changing it anyways. This has been going on for some time now; I request protection until the episode has actually aired, which should be February 20. Sky Warrior 03:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: own userspace . Baby miss fortune 04:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - Sorry, but per
WP:UPROT we don't preemptively/automatically protect pages in the userspace even with user requests. Best,
Mifter (
talk)
05:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: WP:30/500. 172.58.40.115 ( talk) 05:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined
We don't protect preemptively. This page has
never previously been protected and very infrequently edited (with two edits made in total in 2016 and one total in 2015 and 2014 each). Further, extended-confirmation protection is a high level remedy that would only be appropriate if other remedies have been exhausted which is not the case here. Best,
Mifter (
talk)
05:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary emi-protection: High level of IP vandalism going on in the last few minutes. Two IP users are edit warring vandalism of the introduction paragraphs. Tar-Elessar ( talk) 18:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: Repeated attempts by a newish editor to add misleading information to the article (claiming that they won or contested the 2000 elections. Attempts to get them to discuss this on the talk page have failed. As they are an occasional editor, I suggest the protection be for a month in the first instance. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Although I would be O.K. with a "temporary" protection, I'd like to see this page be protected indefinitely (or a few years). I.P.s have been adding the [university's] preferred name of "Louisiana" or removing "ULL", which has been determined to be kept by a consensus on the talk page. You can look at the page history to see that we have been dealing with this for the past 6 months. It's time only confirmed editors can edit the page and any I.P.s/non-confirmed users can request an edit on the talk page. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending Changes: Semiprotection is too much. This is not a commonly vandalised article. 101.161.173.209 ( talk) 07:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you tried asking the protecting administrator first per the instructions?
So
Why
07:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Blocking admin hasn't edited since 2014.
5 albert square (
talk)
07:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please restore semi-protection for 6 months; vandalism restarted as soon as the page was unprotected…. — JFG talk 22:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – This IP hopping vandal has been trying to delete 586 bytes multiple times since January 21 (!!). Whitelock is nice, but it is wasting our time to have this ABF vandal/IPHUMAN spamming the change logs. Thanks. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 23:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IPs have added events without sources on their respective pages, or providing a source. Silverfish ( talk) 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (especially by IP-users) over several years; page has had auto-confirmed protection for the same reason several times. GELongstreet ( talk) 01:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – this requires for protection since unregistered users keep adding without the source cited. . Kazaro ( talk) 01:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal is just hopping IPs at this point to edit the page. 4th new IP leaving the same words. . Semmendinger ( talk) 03:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been linked on multiple forums and websites. Continuous edits attributing the gun to "Kraut Space Magic" are not constructive. -LQN2 ( talk) 18:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Protection expired a day ago, same issues remain. Garchy ( talk) 19:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection. I'm honestly surprised this hasn't been listed here yet. A characteristically intoxicated Oakley just got into a fight in the crowd at Madison Square Garden and Barstool fans are wrecking his article. 2602:306:BC31:4AA0:519D:42CB:4DAE:E0F ( talk) 02:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected. Agreed. The BLP mess is just too volatile for PC1.
Courcelles (
talk)
02:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Archive created to prevent further socking by Vote (X) for Change (a banned user). Archives should not be edited except by admins. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 10:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Can you elaborate? There is no rule that archives should be protected and unless you can prove that this user is vandalizing such pages, no reason to do so either.
So
Why
13:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor
Luis150902 (
talk |
contribs)
14:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 17:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
So
Why
21:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
00:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sustained IP and new/non-confirmed account vandalism, today particularly but regularly and long term over months, probably years. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
00:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 23:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Courcelles (
talk)
00:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 ( talk) 00:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Courcelles (
talk)
00:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 10:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
So
Why
13:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent POV edits made by IP, not backed up by consensus at Talk:Name of the Czech Republic. The IP has been unwilling to seek consensus there or provide edit summaries. Doremo ( talk) 12:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- The IP has now provided a source for its preferred (but atypical) preference. Doremo ( talk) 13:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Protection before Doremo's deleting. Czechia Seeks the SuperStar:
- http://data.bbcentrum.cz/custom/file/May_pdf_final_AJ.pdf
- http://www.artisttrove.com/artist/106112702760569/Madalena+Joao
- Both users reminded that they are edit-warring.
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
So
Why
13:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP is constantly edit warring, ignoring the talk page sections (both on the article as well as on his talk page) yet continues to add unsourced material over and over. -. LouisAragon ( talk) 16:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. --
ferret (
talk)
18:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom - Arab-Israeli conflict related pages
- Political status of the Palestinian territories ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- International law and the Arab–Israeli conflict ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- One-state solution ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing and recurrent IP vandalism of currently serving public officeholder (see [12], [13], [14], [15]). Quis separabit? 18:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
22:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Got protected for shorter duration multiple times, vandalism always came back after the protection expired. -- mfb ( talk) 21:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 210 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
21:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
10 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of frequent vandalism from IPs. Deli nk ( talk) 18:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Long history of frequent vandalism by IP and newly registered accounts. — BarrelProof ( talk) 18:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Some level of vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 19:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
19:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 20:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, no real need to update the article for awhile. BilCat ( talk) 20:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping editor keeps removing sourced content, will not discuss on Talk. Please semi-protect for 2 weeks. thx Jytdog ( talk) 00:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Mifter (
talk)
02:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is an IP hopping person who will not talk. Fuck it, I will unwatch the article. Jytdog ( talk) 07:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material by an IP, and a user. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 12:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. One of the warring accounts is already autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would not be effective.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 13:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
14:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content Donnowin1 ( talk) 11:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
15:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper continues to disrupt this article. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 14:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
14:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No helpful contributions (save for maintenance) for several months, rendering PC essentially useless. Long-term protection suggested. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 14:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
15:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – There are five different sockmasters active in this article. I don't know which IP editor is a sock of which master.
KahnJohn27 and his sock Lakhbir87,
. Marvellous Spider-Man 08:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Please take your sock puppet findings to
WP:SPI. Regards
So
Why
09:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced editing by new and IP users . Nördic Nightfury 09:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kő Cloch ( talk) 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referenced by popular youtuber as already vandalized in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG7hjE4AFmE. Twitbookspacetube ( talk) 02:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Joeyconnick ( talk) 09:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 10:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No page-move vandalism in the page history. Pages are not protected preemptively. 221.126.236.94 ( talk) 07:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Full move protection has been in place since October 2011 and was initially imposed by administrator
Alison. I have taken the liberty of unprotecting it but I will watchlist the page to see if there is a problem.
MelanieN (
talk)
10:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. TheWarOfArt ( talk) 03:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.66 ( talk) 04:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.66 ( talk) 04:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has a long history where IPs have been adding spam links to it. I would recommend it to be indefinitely semi-protected. Alternatively, pending changes protection can also be done here. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 02:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper continues with disruptive editing. Has disrupted 5 times in the last 2 days. Attempts to get him/her on Talk page have failed. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 05:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 05:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Krish | Talk 01:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
02:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GoPurple 'n Gold24 01:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – It seems the TV episode cabal are under the impression that WP:V is irrelevant and have decided that references are only required for TV episodes that have not yet aired. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- The page should be restored to the state where the references were included. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The same user from different IPs is deleting sources and content. The user isn't using talk page and has continued his/her behavior 4 weeks. Ferakp ( talk) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Huon. --
ferret (
talk)
20:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Ferret: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Full protection was applied by Huon, and subsequently lifted following content discussions on talk page. --
ferret (
talk)
22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Single user with dynamic IP's from same PoP persistently vandalizing; ignores warnings; denies discussions on any talk page. AviNation ( talk) 22:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. This appears to be a content dispute over table syntax. IPs appear to be acting in good faith. Additionally, the IPs appear to be repairing some invalid markup. I see no vandalism. --
ferret (
talk)
22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, not enough activity although for semi-protection. RileyBugz Yell at me | Edits 22:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Appears to only have suffered 3 reverts in the past year. --
ferret (
talk)
22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping user continues to vandalize. RileyBugz Yell at me | Edits 22:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two cases of vandalism since August. IPs have been appropriately warned. --
ferret (
talk)
22:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 ( talk) 02:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The same user from different IPs is deleting sources and content. The user isn't using talk page and has continued his/her behavior 4 weeks. Ferakp ( talk) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Huon. --
ferret (
talk)
20:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Ferret: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Full protection was applied by Huon, and subsequently lifted following content discussions on talk page. --
ferret (
talk)
22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Single user with dynamic IP's from same PoP persistently vandalizing; ignores warnings; denies discussions on any talk page. AviNation ( talk) 22:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. This appears to be a content dispute over table syntax. IPs appear to be acting in good faith. Additionally, the IPs appear to be repairing some invalid markup. I see no vandalism. --
ferret (
talk)
22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, not enough activity although for semi-protection. RileyBugz Yell at me | Edits 22:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Appears to only have suffered 3 reverts in the past year. --
ferret (
talk)
22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping user continues to vandalize. RileyBugz Yell at me | Edits 22:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two cases of vandalism since August. IPs have been appropriately warned. --
ferret (
talk)
22:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 ( talk) 02:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, some rather nasty. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Two IP vandals, both given final warnings. Third IP was cleaning up the first IP's vandalism. Feel free to ping me if it persists.--
ferret (
talk)
18:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 18:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined BLP doesn't cover those who have been dead for eight years, and I see nothing related to an actual living person.
Katie
talk
18:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 00:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
00:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
16:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism changing age of person. -glove-(alt, public) ( talk) ( main account's talk) 17:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Left warnings on IPs, both from the same school district. Feel free to ping if they continue. --
ferret (
talk)
17:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think SEMI is better than whitelock, a lot of the vandalism and disruptive edits are made by IPs. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 17:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I'm not seeing enough disruptive editing. Seems to be an even mix of IPs edits being accepted and reverted. --
ferret (
talk)
18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended Semi-protection: Page protection has expired, and now the ip-hopping vandal who has been vandalizing this page and Lucifer and Chaos (mythology) is now vandalizing them again with the same inane nonsense about "souls destroyed."-- Mr Fink ( talk) 21:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended Semi-protection: Page protection has expired, and now the ip-hopping vandal who has been vandalizing this page and Inanna, and Chaos (mythology) is now vandalizing them again with the same inane nonsense about "souls destroyed."-- Mr Fink ( talk) 21:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended Semi-protection: Page protection has expired, and now the ip-hopping vandal who has been vandalizing this page and Inanna, Lucifer is now vandalizing them again with the same inane nonsense about "souls destroyed."-- Mr Fink ( talk) 21:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended Semi-protection: Page protection has expired, and now the ip-hopping vandal who has been vandalizing this page and Inanna, Lucifer and Chaos (mythology) is now vandalizing them again with the same inane nonsense about "souls destroyed."-- Mr Fink ( talk) 21:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent anon vandalism. Must be the time of year. - DVdm ( talk) 21:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term IP disruption . - Mlpearc ( open channel) 21:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
11 February 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
17:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Continued serious BLP violations. Lizard ( talk) 20:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
20:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent promotional editing by newly-created throwaway accounts. Slashme ( talk) 20:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An edit-warring IP is consistently removing an edit stable for months to a non-consensus edit and refusing to discuss. It's a dynamic IP address, so blocking it for edit-warring would be difficult. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 03:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is it possible to block the range, specifically 2601:584:4500:2ae0? City Of Silver 03:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. 2601:584:4500:2ae0::/64 blocked 1 month
NeilN
talk to me
15:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 15:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Only one recreation is not yet a problem.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Remove protection: This article, as it stands, is quite spotty and needs lots of minor improvements, such as a cleanup of links pointing into the projectspace. I have made many useful changes at Talk:Wikipedia/sandbox, but an editreq to incorporate it was denied due to an apparent requirement of consensus, even though the changes were all minor and non-controversial. The problem, I think, was that I rearranged the positions of some sections, and if such changes are also done in the same edit, it would be difficult for others to see exactly what changes have been made. As such, I am requesting that this page be temporarily unprotected to facilitate useful edits, which are simply inappropriate to be done with an edit request (for the reason described above). Having the ability to edit the page would allow me to incorporate my sandboxed changes over many edits which (i) enables to explain each change in the edit summary and (ii) relieves others from the trouble of having to look at diffs in too many changes have been made in one go.
The page was protected over three years back by @ Diannaa:. 103.6.159.72 ( talk) 13:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Vandalism is happening daily, in spite of semi-protection. Some of your amendments do not appear to be improvements (removal of citations, removal of useful internal links, making the prose worse instead of better). —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
14:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- The only citations I removed are Wikipedia project pages being used as refs. The "useful" links to project space are not allowed from mainspace, and were hence removed. 103.6.159.72 ( talk) 16:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be a bit of an edit war going on between two users there. The Ninja5 Empire ( Talk) 04:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - situation appears to have calmed down.
Alexius
Horatius
13:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
17:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Reduction in protection level: From extended-confirmed protection to auto-confirmed or no protection.
The page is in urgent need of several critically important updates. The talk page is protected too just to make the matter worse.
118.108.175.76 ( talk) 02:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Have you tried discussing this with the admin who protected the page? In this case it's Yamla.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 03:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah I just did, awaiting their response... 118.108.175.76 ( talk) 03:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
5 albert square I let them know of the urgency of a protection reduction on their talk page but they do not seem to be responding. The protection must be removed there's so much going on about this airport, its airlines and infrastructure, it all needs to be updated. Please reduce the protection level.
118.108.175.76 (
talk)
11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- They haven't been online since that's why. You need to give them the time to respond to this. Please be patient.--
5 albert square (
talk)
13:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is the blocked vandal, Theeasytarget ( talk · contribs). I will extend the protection on that page. -- Yamla ( talk) 13:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Instead, protection extended to deal with ongoing problems with a blocked vandal. --
Yamla (
talk)
14:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- They haven't been online since that's why. You need to give them the time to respond to this. Please be patient.--
5 albert square (
talk)
13:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
5 albert square I let them know of the urgency of a protection reduction on their talk page but they do not seem to be responding. The protection must be removed there's so much going on about this airport, its airlines and infrastructure, it all needs to be updated. Please reduce the protection level.
118.108.175.76 (
talk)
11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism - possible offwiki brigade. Twitbookspacetube ( talk) 08:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined for now - many of the anon contributions appear legitimate; the story is still unfolding and quick updates in cases like this can be useful.
Alexius
Horatius
13:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Sex related articles recently getting vandalized
- BDSM ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Soggy biscuit ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Chickenhead (sexuality) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
indefinite pending-changes protection: Persistent Vandalism on BDSM. Recently more vandalism on the other two pages. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 09:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
13:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same nonsense gets added by an IP editor every single time the temporary semi protection expires. I strongly suggest that the protection be indefinite because the IP's persistence extends over years so any temporary term is useless. . Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 10:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined for now - not really frequent enough in my opinion - just revert it and re-list it here if the situation worsens.
Alexius
Horatius
13:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism from IP Addresses. Aaryan33056 ( talk) 12:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
13:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Linguist talk| contribs 08:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism for extremely long time, almost like rapid fire, with defamation/bigatory references to real life living people as well(ex. Hillary Clinton, Cooper Andrus, and other living figures), as their names can be seen in the description on the page's history and/or on the vandals edits. The L in the Wikipedia article is being treated as the term 'looser', by vandals. Vandals are both users, and IP address (both IPv4 and IPv6), if looked care fully, in last 250-500 edits. Every second edit is nearly a revert due to un-usefulness, or a revert due to vandalism, the latter is more. I do not know how this page was never protected, even before the current 500 edits, which is just a glimpse of the entire vandalism. Its goes beyond the 500 latest edits to the page. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 08:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
NeilN
talk to me
15:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although Armenian and Kurdish names take place in the etymology section, The editors are in the forefront of ethnicity. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and etymology section, They ignore this part and continue to do ethnic arrangements. This edit war continues for a long time. If necessary, I demand full protection to prevent this. -- 88.243.166.236 ( talk) 10:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Blue's Clues Episodes and Videos
- List of Blue's Clues episodes ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Blue's Clues home video releases ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. IPs were continuing to make disruptive editing to List of Blue's Clues episodes page after it was unprotected. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:D442:F515:10A4:A897 ( talk) 03:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. for
List of Blue's Clues episodes
Mifter (
talk)
04:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for
List of Blue's Clues home video releases
Mifter (
talk)
04:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Mifter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Bot glitch, the two pages are protected. Mifter ( talk) 04:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
NeilN
talk to me
15:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by various IPs, primarily about her heritage. Perhaps pending changes protection would be appropriate, as this has been going on for some time now. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 09:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
13:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Twitbookspacetube ( talk) 12:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
13:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very common insult among the alt-right, so this page gets vandalized sometimes, and this will undoubtedly continue to happen if it is not protected. Everymorning (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
03:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Numerous unsourced and disruptive editing made by IPs. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:D442:F515:10A4:A897 ( talk) 03:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
04:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
But numerous IPs were making unsourced edits that they stated Bolt and The Princess And The Frog is going to be released on February of this year but there are no proof found about that. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:D442:F515:10A4:A897 ( talk) 04:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 12:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 12:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and occasional users (e.g. Cusefan100) who keep reverting his win/loss totals. Oneforfortytwo ( talk) 16:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content by IP's. . Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 16:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
03:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
03:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeatedly info on this page regarding this person has been abused over and over again after the page became unprotected anymore. Request for full protection for this Malaysian legendary sportsperson. Thank you. Shafiqabu ( talk) 17:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 17:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - honestly this is somewhere I wish we still had PC2 for as it is clear their is some disruption however I worry that extended confirmation protection is too restrictive. Best,
Mifter (
talk)
03:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again the same as before numerous IPs adding unsourced info about a 'new look'. AxG / ✉ 19:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - the article is worth keeping an eye on however. Best,
Mifter (
talk)
03:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
03:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SLBedit ( talk) 21:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
U.S. history articles
- Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Stamp Act 1765 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Massachusetts Bay Colony ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Albany Plan ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Benjamin Rush ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: A long history of vandalism by IP and newly registered accounts. — BarrelProof ( talk) 18:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Disruption is not related and recent disruption is not constant.
NeilN
talk to me
23:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- There was certainly some commonality between who was vandalizing those articles. Tracing the vandals' user contribution lists from one article to another is how I found the group of articles. — BarrelProof ( talk) 00:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 00:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by haterediter123. B1 l T l C (C)2016 Brynda1231, Do Not Steal. 02:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Haterediter123 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Anna Frodesiak.
Goodnightmush
Talk
02:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IPs and new users. — Chevvin 04:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
04:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism in producers, genre and label section of the article. Been lasting for weeks now. Anonpediann ( talk) 20:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent frequent insertion of badly sourced material on BLP. ★Trekker ( talk) 22:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent, unexplained reverting by IPs. Around 10 different IPs have made the same edit; suspected sockpuppetry. Quasar G. ( talk) 22:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 23:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also edit filter log. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 23:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's just been far too much vandalism here on this BLP - and the WP:LEAD was not caught till just now, by me, quite by accident. Suggest we lock this down for a bit?. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 02:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TempleM ( talk) 03:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – It seems edit war has been going on for some time, and the page has been reported to OTRS, and has a ticket. Will a page protection force the two to discuss on the talk page, and come in terms reg the content?. I have written a message for suggestion to discuss the article on the talk page, on both users talk page. Dan Koehl ( talk) 17:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
NeilN
talk to me
21:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – A page with this title is almost certainly going to be an attack page (implying the way a person or a group of people speaks seems "retarded"). MereTechnicality ⚙ 20:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Only created once
NeilN
talk to me
21:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – User:0716pyhao has been censoring factual and sourced information: the footballer played for Benfica B. User has also been adding an unreliable source to the subject's "personal life" section. SLBedit ( talk) 20:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
NeilN
talk to me
21:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Article relates to current news event, and there have been a number of disruptive edits made in the last half four. The article will attract more attention as the news story unfolds, with the potential for further nuisance edits. Exxy ( talk) 21:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
22:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 22:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Oshwah.
NeilN
talk to me
23:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lovkal ( talk) 22:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
00:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
12 February 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Going back at least several days, there are damaging edits from several IPs, though it can be difficult to definitively determine whether the intent is to vandalize or whether some could be very misguided but good-faith attempts. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 19:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Swarm
♠
19:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 19:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the slow rate of editing to the article as of late, this seems sufficient to keep people from adding unsourced content without restricting anon editors too much.
So
Why
18:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – After the protection expired on February 9, 2 IPs have continued the addition of an unsourced 2017 event. . Silverfish ( talk) 17:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
18:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of unsourced content by IPs; seems to be a magnet for these in the past few months. - RovingPersonalityConstruct ( talk, contribs) 17:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
18:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Theres a certain IP address that made a disruptive edit on my article. It changes and I need to manually change it back. Please I need it until the series ends on March 4. So 3 weeks of protection enough. Thanks. Leo kingston ( talk) 13:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Remember though that it's
not your article.
So
Why
14:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper continues with disruptive editing even after multiple blocks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
So
Why
18:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP stalker continues with disruptive editing and has evaded 2 blocks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
So
Why
18:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP hopper who refuses to discuss on talk page and violates 3RR rule. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 16:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamgerber80 ( talk) is pushing pov without reliable valid sources. 27.100.20.159 ( talk) 16:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant Vandalism . MatthewTardiff 16:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
MatthewTardiff it was already semi.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP consistently continues to remove cited info and undo constructive edits. . Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamgerber80 ( talk) is NOT providing valid reliable references. 27.100.20.159 ( talk) 17:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor persistently disrupt the article and refuses to discuss any issues on talk page. Has violated 3RR. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamgerber80 ( talk) refuses to discuss and has not provided any reliable sources. 27.100.20.159 ( talk) 17:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, unsourced changes. Standard fan reaction to trade rumors. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
17:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism (changing names of actors even after warned not to). Quasar G. ( talk) 12:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 15:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of Infinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user persistently removes cited content and vandalizes page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 16:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unreliable sources 27.100.20.159 ( talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – long-term persistent multiple recreations of BLP always failing GNG . Instead of salting, an indef semi would prevent most recreations. Full protection would be better. Widefox; talk 10:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
11:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For the same reason as the last request, multiple IPs adding unsourced claims of a new look. AxG / ✉ 13:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, consider reporting the IPs and the probable sock master at
WP:SPI.
So
Why
14:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Voice Actor bulk request
- Megumi Hayashibara ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kōsei Tomita ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Junko Hori ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Masako Nozawa ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued insertion of unverified roles by dynamic IP. Some using copy pasted sources present on those pages despite them not supporting the claim. Range is too big to request a user block so requesting page protections. SephyTheThird ( talk) 14:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
15:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of IPs and new users vandalising and adding unsourced content to page. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 14:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
16:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 12:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
14:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 13:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
14:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper continues to vandalize the page on random changes. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 13:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
14:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring between anonymous users. (Since yesterday, I just found out!) O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi. 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Page protection has just been lifted with a surge of BLP violations as a result. She is evidently a controversial political figure at the moment, so a longer semi-protection seems like a good idea. If she becomes the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, maybe pending changes protections becomes necessary. bonadea contributions talk 11:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
11:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist talk| contribs 11:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
12:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same nonsense gets added by an IP editor every single time the temporary semi protection expires. I strongly suggest that the protection be indefinite because the IP's persistence extends over years so any temporary term is useless. . Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 10:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined for now - not really frequent enough in my opinion - just revert it and re-list it here if the situation worsens.
Alexius
Horatius
13:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- It has happened again. Please look at the whole page history, the IP is very persistent, it's been going on for years. I seem to be the only active editor watching this page so it invariably falls to me to clean it up.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
06:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
AlexiusHoratius Unarchived for further consideration. This is not a matter of "frequent enough" - the IP is very patient and persistent, waiting for months at a time for the temporary protection to expire every time.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
07:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected I concur with
AlexiusHoratius that this is not frequent enough for semi protection, but I do think PC is justified: this is precisely the situation it was designed for. Alexius, I hope you do not mind.
Vanamonde (
talk)
09:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Vanamonde93 pending changes is ideal, why didn't I think of that... Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 09:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
AlexiusHoratius Unarchived for further consideration. This is not a matter of "frequent enough" - the IP is very patient and persistent, waiting for months at a time for the temporary protection to expire every time.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
07:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- It has happened again. Please look at the whole page history, the IP is very persistent, it's been going on for years. I seem to be the only active editor watching this page so it invariably falls to me to clean it up.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
06:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 23:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mifter (
talk)
06:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and otherwise strange counter-productive edits (such as [16], [17]), and some vandalism. Dark Knight 2149 00:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
06:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
'Temporary semi-protection: Repeated re-adding of non-free covert art by various IPs or the same person IP hopping in violation of WP:NFCCP and WP:NFC#cite_note-3. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
06:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 02:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
06:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeatedly adding of unsourced stories by Wikipedia:Single-purpose accounts. The Banner talk 20:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ CambridgeBayWeather: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The semi and PC would not work.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor keeps adding a large block of poorly-written and improperly cited information to the article. Repeated warnings and attempts to communicate have been ignored. No sign that he will either stop or make improvements to his editing. Protection seems the only route. The Old Jacobite The '45 23:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - The Magnificentist 07:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
08:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Let's try for a month? IP-hopping gender warrior cannot understand how gender is assigned at birth, etc. They actually came to talk and ranted, then went back to edit warring their changes. Please semi-protect for a while. thx Jytdog ( talk) 08:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor regularly returns to push his/her POV ( [18], [19], [20], [21]), but he/she does not discuss the issue under the relevant title of the Talk page. Borsoka ( talk) 08:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection:, page has been receiving an increased level of vandalism in the past week or so from a variety of IP addresses. PK T(alk) 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ PKT: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, please try again.... PK T(alk) 02:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IP address, anonymous users, and non-confirmed users. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 01:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High rate of IP vandalism due to recent death. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 01:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
K6ka.
Mifter (
talk)
06:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 05:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist. -
Mifter (
talk)
06:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Needs WP:SALTed. . Avic ennasis @ 01:42, 16 Shevat 5777 / 01:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced reports of death; cannot find anything in the news to confirm it. Home Lander ( talk) 03:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, possibly vandalism, by at least two IPs. BilCat ( talk) 04:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unconfirmed reports in other languages on Twitter stating he has died; one edit already added this with no source. Home Lander ( talk) 21:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Come back if it does become a problem.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 23:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
00:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs had constantly added crystal info so it was protected for a year however this time an autoconfirmed account is now doing the exact same thing ... so I'm requesting PC to again stop the crystal crap, Could I ask that it be done to a year as well please?, Thanks, . – Davey2010 Talk 21:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question:
Davey2010. Do you realise that PC will not stop the autoconfirmed user?
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ah sorry I've always had it stuck in my head it does, Don't ask why, In that case don't worry I'll report the editor, Thanks. – Davey2010 Talk 21:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined For the bot.
Davey2010 extended confirmed would have worked but they are blocked now.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- CambridgeBayWeather - Sorry it's been a very long day!, Clearly not with it today, I didn't give it a thought but anyway thanks again for your help it's always appreciated :), – Davey2010 Talk 21:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Reduce to semi-protection: WP:Village pump is semi-protected, and Radiant! hasn't edited since 28 September 2014. 95.49.116.21 ( talk) 21:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I can't see why there is a need to edit that page.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
21:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
17:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 79.75.202.210 ( talk) 17:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mifter (
talk)
17:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over time 79.75.202.210 ( talk) 18:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
18:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
13 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protection expired and still highly visible due to recent SB loss. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. BlueBlue11 ( talk) 20:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk redirect/template, retargeted to Template:R to list entry, also template-protected. George Ho ( talk) 20:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection**: He wore a gold outfit and people and vandalising his wikipedia page now
Dorianinou ( talk) 03:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Dorianinou: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
04:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection IPs (they are rotating so won't see any talk page warnings) is trying to insert a "joke" version of the estabpishments logo. MarnetteD| Talk 19:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page has been protected four times already, and almost immediately after the protection expires, vandals comes back. Since this is a BLP, I believe it is eligible for this protection permanently. Elisfkc ( talk) 19:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if it keeps up in May.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ RickinBaltimore: ok, as long as there is a plan if it does. Elisfkc ( talk) 19:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 14:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Essentially just one IP...
Lectonar (
talk)
14:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible article coming under attacks from separate IP vandals. Lepricavark ( talk) 16:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Today is Presidents Day national holiday in the USA. Hopefully, a week's protection will take care of this.
— Maile (
talk)
17:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably a shortish semi should suffice. BLP vandalism by multiple IPs and unconfirmed users. TimothyJosephWood 17:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
18:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of over time vandalism by multiple IPs. As well, this page's vandalism has been tweeted about by a verified Twitter account, which means more vandalism is likely to come. I suggest this get protected and then someone take a look at all the sources and revision history to figure out if there's anything else that needs fixing. I simply reverted it to a much older edit that seems reliable. – 🐱? ( talk) (ping me!) 18:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
18:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flurry of BLP-violating activity on this entry; some of the revisions might be appropriate for revdel as well. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 18:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
18:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism spike after release by sports team. Lizard ( talk) 18:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
18:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs had constantly added crystal info and now this editor is too, Thanks. – Davey2010 Talk 12:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. User has been blocked before.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an unregistered user. I have explained my changes, however, the disruptive edits keep occurring. Oliszydlowski (TALK) 12:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Oliszydlowski: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. What I see is disagreement, not necessarily disruptive editing. Explanations via edit summary are not always read, so please either use the articles talk-page (which has not been edited since 2015), or engage the IP-user on his talk-page(s) (I know he is hopping somewhat in the 77.xxx range, but IPs seem stable at least for some edits...and all those 77.xxx IP-talk-pages are redlinked too so far).
Lectonar (
talk)
12:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding an unsourced squad list, which are not generally considered a good idea at this level of football due to the lack of regular updates. Could Bideford A.F.C. be semi-protected for the same reason. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Same goes for
Bideford A.F.C., same IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One multi-sock or a group of kids are targetting this at present with nonsense text . Velella Velella Talk 09:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I don't think striking this through actually helps, so I'm formally declining it just to avoid confusion.
Vanamonde (
talk)
10:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Because people are using this Draftspace page as a full-on test page, unknowingly not loading the redirect,. Jjjjjjdddddd ( talk) 10:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Just 2 incidents in more than 5 months and not even vandalism. Instead, I have deleted the page, and salted
Lectonar (
talk)
11:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary semi-protection to handle new/IP editors repeated adding highly promotional content to article. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This should've been protected indef... Persistent editing of my userpage by banned sock Profile101. Nördic Nightfury 08:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (in my opinion user talk pages shouldn't be semi-protected indefinitely - hopefully 1 month is enough to put them off though) --
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
08:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 12:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of incorrect or against consensus information, ignoring hidden warning messages. Kosack ( talk) 13:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
04:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – trolls continue to add unsourced info. Digifan23 ( talk) 06:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Many IPs keep removing content; the removals have been reverted. I don't think PC would hold off such removals. George Ho ( talk) 07:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IExistToHelp ( talk) 00:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deletion of material by seven separate single issue IPs in the last 24 hours. Tom (North Shoreman) ( talk) 01:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are back trying to add unsourced material that there is no consensus for. This has been going on for some time, other established editors have been combating it besides myself, and the page has been protected multiple times. Protection for at least a month is needed. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: One user (I believe) using multiple IPs to add unsourced info to the article. The actor has been cast in a musical, but there has been no confirmation about him leaving the show he is currently in. JuneGloom07 Talk 03:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits in past month or so are vandalism. A nuisance keeping up with it. . Hertz1888 ( talk) 04:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute over inclusion of Shaq/Big Show match. This has been reported by reliable sources and is constantly being removed by other editors without participating in the talk page discussion. -- Dane talk 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
06:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This title, as well as the titles J.Deepa jayakumar and J.Deepa have been used to promote the same subject. . — Sam Sailor 00:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Article has only been created twice and has not been deleted via A7 G11 or AfD.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IExistToHelp ( talk) 00:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – within past hour multiple IPs/new users continue to add factual errors/vandalism. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 05:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
05:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism - game won't happen for almost.2.years. BilCat ( talk) 02:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Ad Orientem.
Mz7 (
talk)
03:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Actually I'm requesting a salting, but since the article hasn't been deleted just yet, I can't request that at the moment. This has been deleted twice already for promotion, so once this is deleted, this should be salted. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 03:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Mz7 (
talk)
03:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs) 03:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor continues to add random uncited info on this page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 21:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
21:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP sock . Wolbo ( talk) 21:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mifter (
talk)
21:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 22:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Re-blocked Talk page editing revoked. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Using {{
RFPP}} for the bot to archive:
Requesting immediate archiving...
Mz7 (
talk)
03:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Under pretty heavy attack from IP vandals. City Of Silver 21:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mifter (
talk)
21:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- You ought to consider blocking everybody in 2601:48:c503:ee10 since this person will probably just switch identities to a different part of that range again. City Of Silver 21:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, continuing after end of last protection. 2601:188:1:AEA0:8949:EA87:45B1:DF70 ( talk) 00:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ Cyberpower678: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Pending changes isn't helping stop genre warriors. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 01:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A relentless IP changing genre's. IP waits for the page protection to expire and goes back to work. Pending changes would also help. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
21:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment
Mlpearc I was just looking at this and about to decline the request for the same reason. Looking at the page history I am seeing very little in the form of disruptive editing and there is no history of page protection at all. Are you sure this is the page you meant to request PP for? -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Ad Orientem: There are other "Hoobastank" pages, the activity I discribed could be on another page, but the disruption is the same. No worries, I'll just remove all Hoobastank pages from my watch. -
Mlpearc (
open channel)
21:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- I see. Unfortunately there is not much we can do about this kind of low level "now and then" kind of vandalism. It comes with the territory. And short of requiring registration in order to edit, which the community has repeatedly rejected, we are just going to have to live with it. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 21:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Ad Orientem: There are other "Hoobastank" pages, the activity I discribed could be on another page, but the disruption is the same. No worries, I'll just remove all Hoobastank pages from my watch. -
Mlpearc (
open channel)
21:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment
Mlpearc I was just looking at this and about to decline the request for the same reason. Looking at the page history I am seeing very little in the form of disruptive editing and there is no history of page protection at all. Are you sure this is the page you meant to request PP for? -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This is on the Contact page. – 🐱? ( talk) (ping me!) 00:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done I've cascaded the contact page so all templates on that page will inherit full protection. If any admin feels this was inappropriate, please feel free to override my action and let me know.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2601:188:1:AEA0:8949:EA87:45B1:DF70 ( talk) 00:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
01:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper removes cited info and refuses to discuss on talk page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 00:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamgerber80 ( talk) is inserting unreliable data without valid reliable references sources. 27.100.20.44 ( talk) 00:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: I dont think protection is needed anymore. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you asked the protecting admin,
GlassCobra (
talk ·
contribs), first?
So
Why
12:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up on this. Although the initial reason for protecting the redirect was based on a discussion from 2009, I still agree with the rationale -this should be kept at semiprotection level to prevent bad-faith moves. Glass Cobra 20:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined.
Favonian (
talk)
20:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 19:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Better solution would be to report Sparhawk85 to edit warring noticeboard rather than locking down the page for everyone else in the world :) . Keri ( talk) 19:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trump-related vandalism following Grammys. TheKaphox T 23:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by dynamic IP . McSly ( talk) 23:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oops -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed. Semi PP x 1 week. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oops -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Single IP that stopped after two edits half a day ago.
So
Why
18:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent editing from several IP users claiming that Husky Tours has been bought by another company Yanson Group of Bus Companies without any proof, citation or article. Please see also article " Advanced Liner" which the logo was all made up from " SriLankan Airlines". Thanks! Bumbl_loid 18:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
18:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blockevasion vandalism . Wolbo ( talk) 22:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 10:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – page seems to be a favorite of user:MariaJaydHicky and his socks. Kellymoat ( talk) 20:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As most of the recent socks have not been autoconfirmed lets try longer term semi first, if this does not work we can step up to ECP.
Mifter (
talk)
21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 1 month semi. Article recently came off semi-protection to prevent POV editing at the article. The film's box office figures have been openly disputed by reliable sources, yet editors keep removing any indication of the dispute in favor of the higher, disputed figures. Most recent example after protection expired here. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
21:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Highly visible controversial Trump admin person, consistent vandalism, edit warring. NPalgan2 ( talk) 21:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lets see how Semi works for a while before jumping right to ECP.
Mifter (
talk)
21:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist talk| contribs 21:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
21:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from about ten IPs over the past hour. Master of Time (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
21:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continous edit warring/content dispute. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D ( talk) 21:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Mz7. -
Mifter (
talk)
21:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
14 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP address is insisting that Husky tours was sold to Yanson Group of Companies.....which is not. Bumbl_loid 14:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
- Lectonar, please reconsider the request. An IP adress is ensisting to do some edits which are not facts at all. Bumbl_loid 14:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- I have responded on my talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 14:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent attempts by editors with an anti-Semitic agenda to insert quote with single source – and primarily perpetuated on anti-Semitic hate sites – on Israel. Mélencron ( talk) 18:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
18:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Shortish semi - Undoubtedly socks of the same person inserting pretty serious BLP issues into the article over the past couple of days. TimothyJosephWood 18:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
18:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Protection: High level of IP vandalism. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Talk-pages, as a rule, a rarely protected anyway, and if so, only for short periods. The amount of disruption is far from the level needed for that.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User with a floating IP continues to alter a quotation in the article because they disagree with what it says. 331dot ( talk) 13:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This is way too slow for semi-protection. I have watchlisted to see if pending-changes protection might be useful.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent copyvios by IP's (cut and pasting text from another website onto the article). Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 14:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Regular unsourced additions. 2405:204:D109:22B7:34E5:94C1:E747:A117 ( talk) 12:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent spamming of channels. The Banner talk 19:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—
CYBERPOWER (
Be my Valentine)
03:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I am trying to take this list to FL. Persistent disruptive editing from IPs. Persistent deletion of content. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Ssven2: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
15 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Will be better than pending changes protection. The Physician ( talk) 16:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. The high level of accepted edits by anon users shows that this is exactly why pending changes protection was created.
So
Why
17:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Strong suspicion this is a blocked editor JacksonViking, for what that's worth but the content and behavior is disruptive irregardless. . John from Idegon ( talk) 17:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. Take it to
WP:SPI, there is no disruption except this one editor who can be blocked.
So
Why
17:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Create-protection. See also Marian (deejay). 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. (both articles)
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent distruptive IP editing. The problematic edits is exactly changing the religious affiliation of the facility to that another sect. I honestly think blocking the IPs wont do since the user(s) seems to hop across different IPs. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 18:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, consisting of addition of unverified or improperly verified information, esp. promotional stuff such as philanthropy, awards, "social activities", all by IP editors and drive-by accounts. Preferably long-term semi-protection. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 18:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Persistent vandalism; bored children don't like their school. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
20:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Physician ( talk) 14:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Physician ( talk) 14:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No page-move vandalism in the history. Pages are not protected preemptively. 219.79.126.167 ( talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Hurricanehink: Lectonar ( talk) 07:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- SPI case is filed against this IP, who also uses other multiple IPs on related topics. -- George Ho ( talk) 11:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Block evasion
NeilN
talk to me
14:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No page-move vandalism in the history. Pages are not protected preemptively. 219.79.126.167 ( talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Hurricanehink: Lectonar ( talk) 07:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- SPI case is filed against this IP, who also uses other multiple IPs on related topics. -- George Ho ( talk) 11:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Block evasion
NeilN
talk to me
14:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Article is massively edited by user Gethoto [22], who is adding a lot of unsourced material and changing stats in the infobox, despite the Soccerway source says otherwise. Like his last edit [23] User Gethoto seems to be connected to Mirchev, since editing this article is his only activity on Wikipedia. He is adding false data to the article since 2011, and doesn't care about warnings I gave him [24]. He forged stats again yesterday, just hours after I gave him a final warning [25] Oleola ( talk)
- Declined
Gethoto is already autoconfirmed, so neither pending changes nor semi-protection would keep him from editing the article if it was protected. That aside, the disruption is not big enough to warrant protection, see our
protection policy.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: And now he has been blocked...
Lectonar (
talk)
10:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
So
Why
17:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is article about president, it should not be open for ip's, as we have reverts and vandalism all the time. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 11:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Just a spike the last day(s); has not been edited for months before that.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since February 6th we've had 3 IP editors from Brigham Young University and an IP from Utah, probably the same person, add material to this article attacking the SPLC or removing critical material. . Doug Weller talk 17:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Usuaully, I would have blocked the sock but with a school IP this is not feasible.
So
Why
17:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism with unregistered and newly registered accounts. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║ Contributions) 17:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Didn't realize it was today's featured article, for which the policy mandates shorter protection.
So
Why
18:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuing edits by indeffed User:Unvwiki as an IP or as with his new account User:Arjayfoolman made to annoy me. Has used multiple IPs in the past so cannot just block the IP - Arjayay ( talk) 14:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection: Extensive vandalism, some BLP, by IPs and new accounts, following coverage on the press.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
15:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring between editors and IP, beginning to slide toward incivility. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 15:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree...escalating too much.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP Vandalism- Of late, this page has been affected by high level of IP vandalism. Just see first 250 or 500 edits of the page history. Most of the IP users make disruptive edits and adversely affect the notability of article. The passenger statistics in infobox of article which inspite of being well sourced with official references and calculated from those sources become easy targets of IP vandals. They modify them as per their choice. Many other vandals often remove names of destinations from section "Airlines and Destinations" of this article after just perceiving those flights (mostly same aircraft stopping or via flights) as non-operational. Many others involve in removal of citations. This article needs immediate semi-protection for indefinite time period. Vibhss ( talk) 13:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This user talk page has been vandalized by various IPS in the last days. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 14:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. @
Sro23: if you want this removed earlier please let me know
--
Samtar
talk ·
contribs
14:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Physician ( talk) 14:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 01:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 04:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, this is one IP, they have been just warned for the second time, and if they continue, they must be blocked. Feel free to return here if they change the IP.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated addition of hoaxed content by an IP-hopping vandal, purporting that a number of characters were voiced by Filipino actors. Blake Gripling ( talk) 11:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected With a heavy heart but since the three semis before didn't work, this seems to be necessary. With no prejudice against unprotecting in the future if too many good-faith edits by anon editors are caught in the PC.
So
Why
13:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: generic vandalism and unsourced content. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See contributions from past hour. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 08:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism going back to January from a number of IP accounts. I believe the page was temporarily protected at the start of February but is no longer so, and the problems are all back in full force. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 10:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 IP Sockpuppet. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Ongoing vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs, as with many articles involving gender. Funcrunch ( talk) 02:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
03:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Daily vandalism since previous protection wore off two weeks ago. He's the starting quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys; this won't end any time soon. See Tony Romo for a precedent. Lizard ( talk) 06:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized twice in the 4 days since protection ended. Not likely to end until contract situation is settled. TM 17:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Two instances of vandalism in four days is not that bad. PP is intended for severe and persistent vandalism. If it picks up come back.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- There's been a third and it was already semi-protected for persistent vandalism this month.-- TM 02:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 01:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. TonyBallioni ( talk) 04:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done
Mifter (
talk)
04:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Persistent IP vandalism. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 16:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More nonsense vandalism from anon IPs. Vjmlhds 16:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There has been some IP vandalism, but not a lot. And I am extremely reluctant to protect a page that gets so many IP edits, most of which appear to be good. If the situation gets really bad come back and we can discuss pending changes protection.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting semi-protection for a month. There seems to be repeated addition of WP:COPYVIO plot content. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 18:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - it appears the copyvios were dealt with. If they resume we can reexamine.
Mifter (
talk)
23:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets of User:Orchomen abusing my talk page. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 18:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – User talk pages
are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. - it appears the sock has been dealt with.
Mifter (
talk)
23:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of fancruft and BLP violations by anons and new-ish contributors. Sitush ( talk) 23:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
23:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP users. Nördic Nightfury 15:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
23:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
23:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resumed within hours of page protection expiration. Protection meant to deal with LTA (see abuse filter and page history). EvergreenFir (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
State (polity)
Semi-protection: Floating IP persistently adds irrelevant information. Discussion impossible, since each time it is a new IP. Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 01:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Mifter.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 01:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
— Maile (
talk)
01:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every IP edit since the last round of protection expired has been vandalism. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I realize this was declined earlier, but the user has persisted and continued to be disruptive after being blocked(using floating IP). 331dot ( talk) 21:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism. 13 of 50 recent edits can be described as vandalism, and most of them more recent. Most constructive contributors are registered and active accounts. One IP is currently edit warring, and one instance of IP vandalism was left unreverted for over an hour. -- Firestar493 / Nightstar648 23:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended or indefinite semi - You can find occasional constructive editing by newbies and anons if you look hard enough, but it's few and far between, with fairly constant long term vandalism and reversion in the interim. Divine Comedy is probably the single most famous 14th Century literary work (take your pick, this or Chaucer), and it should be a fairly stable article anyway, with no reason to expect the steady stream of, what are undoubtedly forlorn high school literature students, to end any time soon. TimothyJosephWood 18:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. An examination of the editing history does show pervasive vandalism over a long period. Hopefully this will throw some cold water on their fun.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting temporary semi-protection for about a week. Some IPs are adding unsourced content/OR. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 18:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection The Continuation of vandalism & unsourced edits without heading the hidden warning - Requesting Full semi-protection until June of this year. ZeEnergizer ( talk) 19:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toddst1 ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Gilliam.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 17:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
23:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term target of libelous vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 18:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Kuru. -
Mifter (
talk)
23:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Folks repeatedly adding "hero" to article. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 16:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – addition of unsourced content by new and unregistered users. ∼∼∼∼
Eric0928
Talk
16:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A perennial magnet for vandalism, vastly outnumbering constructive edits. Previous protection for 30 or 60 days at a time was too little. Something substantially longer, please--preferably permanent. Hertz1888 ( talk) 21:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
— Maile (
talk)
21:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: I'm currently working to cleanup and reorganize archived pages in the "Wikipedia:" namespace to allow easier navigation for readers and editors ... and in the process, ran across this protected page that needs moving. This page should be moved to a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured article review, but I'm asking for the page to be unprotected instead of requesting a move via WP:RMTR since I may need to move this page multiple times to resolve issues with already existing subpages of Wikipedia:Featured article review/Bulbasaur. Disclaimer: This page was protected in 2006 and its protecting admin hasn't edited since 2013. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected It looks like this was protected in order to stop people commenting in a closed discussion, I don't think that's likely to happen over a decade later.
Hut 8.5
22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
16 February 2017
Permanent extended confirmation protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs and registered users, which has been going on for YEARS. GoAnimateFan199Pro ( talk) 03:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Already protected; last to the article was almost 2 weeks ago.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. GoAnimateFan199Pro ( talk) 07:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 15:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CaptainPedge | Talk 15:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
17:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated disruption by IP's. Naila Khan ( talk) 12:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined It seems to be the same user using different IPs, trying to make a good-faith change and being reverted without anyone explaining them why. None of the IPs as far as I see have ever been told on their talk page why they have been reverted. Explain it to the user and see if they still do it, then we can talk protection.
So
Why
13:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 15:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – easy target for school vandalism from anons . WNYY98 ( talk) 15:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Qaei ☎ 10:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
11:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: once editor keeps on the article shows WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL no source from venue and date. Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Per
WP:CRYSTAL this seems actually a valid article since the event is notable and almost certainly taking place in the near future. Regardless, without consensus there is no reason to protect.
So
Why
11:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The actor himself has confirmed that the information currently on the page (as of 2/16/2017) is accurate. Certain individuals, however, keep on editing the page needlessly. This needs to be stopped. . Djorn89 ( talk) 11:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- (
edit conflict) Declined, not a valid reason for protection. Please remember that
no one owns an article, not even the subject himself. We determine ourselves what is accurate (per
WP:V). Besides, we have no idea if you are telling the truth, do we?
So
Why
11:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - The Magnificentist 10:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Days of vandalism from IPs and new users. Justeditingtoday ( talk) 13:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked one of the users.
Vanamonde (
talk)
13:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 13:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
13:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since this page has become unprotected there has already been a lot of vandalism - again, the only thing Marina Joyce is really notable for is her controversy, so now that that's over there isn't anything to update her page about, yet there's persistent vandalism: I think it'd save a lot of all of our time to just protect it. . Romeowth ( talk) 00:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
07:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther : Talk 01:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Only seeing one issue in the last month and the IP is blocked. Ping me if problems increase.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - The Magnificentist 08:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Page was edited last on february 5th.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Octoberwoodland ( talk) 06:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Am only seeing two instances in the history of the article. If it continues ping me and I will than protect. A little early right now IMO.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
06:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, Thanks. :-) Octoberwoodland ( talk) 07:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruption by IPs and fresh a/cs. Alexbrn ( talk) 09:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Orphaned. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you asked the protecting admin,
JamesBWatson, first?
So
Why
13:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Suggest that this be permanent, since the vandals always return after protection is lifted. -- Oneforfortytwo ( talk) 17:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Is there any consensus on excluding some of the numbers like the note says? I cannot find any such rule or discussion and if there isn't, the displayed behavior is imho more a case of
edit-warring and not vandalism.
So
Why
17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- If the NCAA does not officially recognize the victories, then they are not credited on Wikipedia. See
John Calipari, for example. You can also look at
this page as a reference. --
Oneforfortytwo (
talk)
17:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough disruption for semi-protection, as disruptive editing is not really sustained, but comes in bursts. Let's see how pending-changes works.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
SALT: Repeatedly recreated. Unlikely to be notable topic. Coderzombie ( talk) 20:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Done
— Maile (
talk)
20:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Mz7 (
talk)
06:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected Procedural.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of non-notable children names. Also personal attacks from some IPs. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 07:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unregistered users violating BLP policy, adding bias, unsourced items, and editing out lines and words that make content compliant with BLP, such as editing out the word "alleged". Cr@$h3d@t@ t@1k t0 m3 02:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Immediate resumption after last protect ended. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you got the right page? This one wasn't ever protected as far as I can see.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Permanent extended confirmation protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated reintroduction by IP hopper of POV pushing original research, egs [27], [28], [29], and of person attacks on other editors, [30], [31]. duffbeerforme ( talk) 04:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If problems persist ping me and I will protect for longer.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 04:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - The Magnificentist 05:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption has started again. — IB [ Poke ] 05:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temperary Semi-protection: Persistent IP editors edit warring without joining talk. Ongoing issue with SPA at this article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 06:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:AP Offensive Players of the Year ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:AP NFL MVPs ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotect: Were semi-protected in 2008 and the protecting admin hasn't been active for a while. I really have no idea why they were semi'd in the first place. Lizard ( talk) 00:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done Both. Protection was labeled as being for "high-use template".
Lectonar (
talk)
07:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP socking. - LouisAragon ( talk) 18:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 23:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
00:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101. 172.56.38.31 ( talk) 01:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 06:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
06:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 06:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
06:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: recurrent and consistent edit warring; magnet article due to subject's political background and especially comments re LGBT (see [32], [33]). Quis separabit? 15:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. Semi-protection is not for edit-warring and there is not really much to justify full protection (which is the correct response to edit-warring that cannot be contained by blocks).
So
Why
17:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Blurp92 ( talk) 18:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I agree as an "uninvolved" editor. (I started warning the other editors about the warring, but I am personally not in the war / have not edited the page in question). J♯m ( talk | contribs) 21:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The edit warring seems to have died down since warnings were issued. Come back if the problem returns or you can report it at the 3RR noticeboard.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. This page has been regularly visited by several IPs who are attempting to insert the partisan, unencyclopedic, and false prose "It is considered a Clinton outrage machine which has set a $40 million budget to oppose President Trump." These edits are probably all coming from the same person but who knows? City Of Silver 19:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Transcluded in 700+ pages, all of them orphaned talk pages of deleted (and redirected) pages, most of them file pages. George Ho ( talk) 10:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Does 700 pages really make it a high-risk template per
WP:HRT? As far as I know, there has not been any new discussion to override the consensus (see
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive638#Mass fully protecting templates and the discussion at
WT:HRT) that just because a template is used on hundreds of pages, it is not really a high-risk template if no vandalism occurred and the page is visible to many readers. Here, neither applies. I think this request should be declined but I am leaving it up for further input by other admins. Regards
So
Why
15:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor. Hmm... you're right. Not adequately visible to many readers, despite high count. I'll re-request this when the transclusion amount is way higher than now. --
George Ho (
talk)
20:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps getting vandalized. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 22:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Excirial. -
Mifter (
talk)
00:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This subject is hot currently in Serbia, it must be protected, just look at vandalism just today! Protect this page!!. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 00:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
00:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. −− Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question:
Iazyges, why?
NeilN
talk to me
21:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ NeilN: Sorry, forgot to fill out reasoning. Its within my userspace, and my signature transcludes it (for simplicity), so I would prefer if no one messed with it. -- −− Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
NeilN
talk to me
21:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by either one user with a dynamic IP or multiple IP editors. Article subject is the target of a recent political controversy and as such trolling may not slow down until the controversy does. Pishcal ( talk) 22:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent non-NPOV editing from multiple IPs (or possibly one user hopping IPs) inserting political epithets, etc. RA0808 talk contribs 22:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism related to Mandela effect, due to youtube video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYonTBRM0VI around 11:30). . Sjrct ( talk) 22:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
23:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
17 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This happens every other day, and now I'm keeping my word of promising to request protection. A user is persistently attempting to pervert the information provided by the sources. I am tired of reverting them and think this would be a fitting instance of protection. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 13:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Constant revision for sandboxing (I think). IP needs minor discouraging. Peter Rehse ( talk) 14:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Constant revision for sandboxing (I think). IP needs minor discouraging. Peter Rehse ( talk) 14:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 14:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done. by admin but ended minutes ago. --
George Ho (
talk)
17:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite template-editor protection: Wikipedia:High-risk templates. Frietjes ( talk) 16:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
18:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Given the nature of this page and the fact that it's already been attacked by Orchomen's socks a few times, this should be an indefinite extended confirmed protection, just like it is on my sock list here.
BU Rob13 originally semi-protected the page indefinitely, but after socks who had registered accounts and who were making several edits in their user space in order to get confirmed status started getting through, Callmemirela, who's also been helping us with this battle, requested extended confirmed protection, but only at a temporary level. I suggested an indefinite level, but the administrator who protected the page wasn't Rob, but rather Ad Orientem who, I guess, wasn't fully aware of the extent of the situation, which is understandable, and only temporarily extended protected the page. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I only requested a temporary protection because Orchomen had been vandalizing the page under IP and new user accounts. I thought temporary would be more suited because I assumed that Orchomen would eventually give up on that page. However, based on Orchomen's MO, it is likely he will return to the SIP page and vandalize again. I think indefinite protection would be appropriate. Just thought I'd give my two cents should an admin need it.
Callmemirela 🍁
{Talk}
♑
16:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- This seems appropriate given the circumstances and the type of page this is. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I for one am convinced.
Extended confirmed protected if another admin wants to undo, feel free.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Prominent help page, frequently damaged by lost/new editors. John of Reading ( talk) 12:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – As soon as the last semi ended, the anons etc came back to insert the same unsourced material. They've not responded to the talk page thread that I opened in January. Sitush ( talk) 16:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
17:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – last 2 semi protections have been year long, the latest of which will expire shortly/highly visible . WNYY98 ( talk) 20:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 21:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending changes is already in place and appears to be working fine; vandalism rate isn't high enough to warrant an increase to semi-protection.
Mz7 (
talk)
04:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Time for another protection here. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 14:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Amaury: Extended confirmed?
NeilN
talk to me
15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ NeilN: Thank you, Nein. To explain, semi-protection is only 100% useful against IPs; however, not so much against registered accounts since they can easily make several edits in their user space to get around that by getting confirmed status, which our long-term sockpuppeteer has done in the past, and I wouldn't put it past them to do it again with only semi-protection on my talk page. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced information. Jacklbell ( talk) 02:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 02:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article Devanagari transliteration's section Transliteration comparison has tables. Unsourced or disruptive edits or vandalism to the tables by unregistered IP user Special:Contributions/50.165.173.42. Their other 2 edits to 2 other articles are removed too. Earliest edit diff for other article seems to be related to blog, Gujalish, (May be Gujarati language with English is Gujalish.) Gujalish. In article Devanagari transliteration's section Transliteration comparison's table they have added unsourced, undefined content, possibly wrong & they have hidden by pipe trick pre existing good encylopedic information. This constitutes vandalism. The relevant edit diffs are edit 1 and at edit 2 . About this vandalism, talkpage discussion at article, notice placed at disruptive IP user's talkpage. Correcting these mistakes in the comparison tables section is very difficult and time consuming. Please add semi protected status to this section atleast Devanagari transliteration's section Transliteration comparison , so disruptive edits or vandalism can be lessened from unregistered IP users. Thanks, by contributor 2know4power ( talk) 21:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC).
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last edit of IP 50.xxx was more than a month ago.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous addition of unsourced content . Den-Drater 21:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This goes for the talk-page and the article, as I think you wanted to request the article to be protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Creation-protection: Repeatedly recreated by PR agencies. Coderzombie ( talk) 12:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Fanoftheworld using Denmark IP. Binksternet ( talk) 16:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Comment: pinging @
Jimbo Wales: as this pertains to him, and would probably be his decision.
Gamebuster19901
(Talk║
Contributions)
21:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined This page has oodles of watchers, so vandalism and its perpetrators are usually dealt with in seconds, literally.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Recreated just once.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Cow cleaner 5000 sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 07:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. VQuakr ( talk) 07:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perhaps only temporary is required- but now on the third sock to disrupt the article. Same MO of becoming auto-confirmed on talk page before hand [34], [35]. O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi. 11:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bongwarrior..
So
Why
11:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted 3 times in last month. Boleyn ( talk) 07:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Tavix.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently adding irrelevant or incorrect information. . The Banner talk 08:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 09:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper ( talk) 21:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP editors. Constant314 ( talk) 22:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jacklbell ( talk) 02:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced information. Jacklbell ( talk) 02:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 IP Sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
08:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Coded as part of Template:Infobox flag. Edited mostly by template editors last year. -- George Ho ( talk) 06:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. Coding for collapsing a discussion is complex. Mostly edited by TEs last year. George Ho ( talk) 06:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism is back on that article since it has been removed from pending changes. BattleshipMan ( talk) 20:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have reinstated the pending changes protection, which worked well while in place. Not enough disruption for semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet ( talk) 21:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection should be enough.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent uncited and unproven changes mostly by IP only users who also break tables. ECP protection would definitely be a good thing. . SanAnMan ( talk) 04:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing. Dynamic IP is edit warring content. I requested that the user start a talk page discussion regarding what they believe the issues to be per WP:BRD but, so far, the user has just added a POV comment to a thread from 2016 here. Iryna Harpy ( talk) 04:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Cyberbot I: It seems that a sysop stepped in while I was submitting the request so, yes, the page is now protected. Thanks! -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 05:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Ian.thomson.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption and vandalism, by block evader and sockpuppeter, which started up right after the previous protection expired. Softlavender ( talk) 05:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- You beat me to it... Twitbook space tube 05:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Barek.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 17:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopper repeatedly adding a non-notable name to list of partners. They're currently blocked as three different IPs but obviously have no intention of stopping. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could you please change the pending changes protection to semi. Some users with pending changes rights are accepting changes without even checking it with the source. The Physician ( talk) 17:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- FULL SEMI won't help you with that, Doc. I was going ot ask for one week FULL because 3-4 junk edits daily are making find jewels a pain. Waiting untilt he fervour dies downa nd reliabel sources appear will imrpove article. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 21:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for full protection, as almost all of the disruptive edits are made by IPs or unconfirmed users.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP keeps changing name of this footballer. Qed237 (talk) 19:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized in short amount of time by multiple ips (apparent socks). Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
04:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 22:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined completely false report, created once years ago
Beeblebrox (
talk)
22:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 22:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined only created twice, last creation was in 2011
Beeblebrox (
talk)
22:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi Another one of those pages that's only on my watchlist because it's vandalized daily. Protection log which is literally longer than my 4 month old daughter's arm. TimothyJosephWood 00:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Mz7 (
talk)
04:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandal edits from various IPs. . KNHaw (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Vanjagenije.
Mz7 (
talk)
04:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Name is similar to Donald Trump - persistent vandalism occurs on this article as WP:BLUELOCK is working well there. DrStrauss talk 17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mz7 (
talk)
21:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mz7 (
talk)
21:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from schools . WNYY98 ( talk) 22:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
00:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 11:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I see very scant editing of the article, and the last disruptive edit on february 2nd. So while I acknowledge that articles have to be protected extended confirmed in certain cases, I do not see a need to do so when there is virtually no disruption. I'll leave the decision to another admin.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected True, disruption is minimal, but as far as I can tell current consensus is that
WP:30/500 requires EC protection to be applied as soon as a violation actually occurs, which here was the case on Feb 2nd. There is a current request for clarification at
WP:ARCA that might result in a different handling in the future but for now I think our hands are bound in such cases. Regards
So
Why
13:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent recreation of copyvio page. It's potentially just about notable but I think if they want to create the article they can start from a non-copyvio draft. Blythwood ( talk) 13:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, recreated only once. SALTing requires some more disruption than that.
So
Why
14:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 22:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
00:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
18 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page was granted pending changes semi protection several days ago, but it is still being persistently vandalised. BlueBlue11 ( talk) 18:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.30 ( talk) 20:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.30 ( talk) 20:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
20:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting PC protection for a while because IPs are edit warring over the name of O'Neill's position. Her party refuses to use the term 'Northern Ireland' which is why there has been a lot of editing. There's also an election taking place, which is why she's currently high profile (and probably the reason why there are so many disruptive edits). st 170 e 13:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism going on since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. BasFey ( talk) 15:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
16:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP and new user vandalism of this BLP. Everytime protection ends vandalism starts again. I recommend indefinite protection since this has been protected almost ten times in the past few years. Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
18:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Because pending changes requires an editor to review and approve any changes having it protected indef runs the risk of generating unnecessary workload if future issues subside. Mifter ( talk) 18:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent addition of unsourced material added by various signed editors, as well as by IP addresses. Boomer Vial Holla! We gonna ball 11:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Currently an edit war is going on and I think it's about time to stop it. The Ninja5 Empire ( Talk) 12:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I've posted a caution on the talk pages of the involved editors.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
14:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The title has no scope. sami talk 15:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
19 February 2017
Protection: Used by 200+ redirect pages whose titles are phrases, some of whose targets are semi-protected. George Ho ( talk) 06:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template.
Mifter (
talk)
16:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Another recent bout of disruptive editing from various IPs. – Uanfala (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
16:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has a history of IP vandalism, has been flaring up again over the last few weeks. MrOllie ( talk) 15:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
16:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't my page to be vandalized. . IExistToHelp ( talk) 16:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. - see
WP:UPROT -
Mifter (
talk)
16:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
20 February 2017
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. MereTechnicality ⚙ 17:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Amortias.
Mz7 (
talk)
20:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unkownzero, new socks appear at a rapid pace. Sro23 ( talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPv6 blanking. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 20:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
20:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only one disruptive edit in the last week.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – significant increase in vandalism from IPs over the last months. Jake Brockman ( talk) 15:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by alt-right trolls with edit notes "hail kek" (see Alt-right#Use_of_memes) Jytdog ( talk) 18:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
18:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some disruptive edits are being made by an IP based user who is not taking concensus or communicating via talk page. The page this needs immediate protection from such editors. If suited. The protection should be a permanent one. . wb_admin ( talk) 06:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Physician ( talk) 06:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism, mostly from anonymous IP accounts. Psychonaut ( talk) 10:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Disruptive edits rather few and far between.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano sock, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
10:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano sock, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
So
Why
10:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 13:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bongwarrior.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
13:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent adding of excessive detail by IPs, failure to discuss. Quasar G. ( talk) 13:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism by mostly IP users. They ignore the consensus for this page and keep deleting what they do not like. Sabbatino ( talk) 13:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have watchlisted and will evaluate if semi-protection is necessary. For now disruption is not high enough for semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content without comment by sock IPs. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 13:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Continued to be vandalised by IPs after being unprotected. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try pending changes first; actually only 2 instances of vandalism after end of last protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – It is editing the promotional content. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk | Contributions) 09:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. DarjeelingTea ( talk) 12:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
RHaworth.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 06:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Comment: Continuing vandalism/addition of factual errors on
Buddy Hield
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4].
Boomer Vial
Holla! We gonna ball
07:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
10:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 06:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
10:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 06:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
10:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated, unjustified removal of relevant, well cited content by an IP user and an SPA editor. Exemplo347 ( talk) 06:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
So
Why
10:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 21:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
— Maile (
talk)
22:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. Uptoniga ( talk) 06:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.
So
Why
10:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Cahk ( talk) 08:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
BethNaught..
So
Why
10:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: As a result of this, the article should no longer be protected. Nickag989 talk 17:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Unclear what your rationale is. The 3RR report you cite is about
Survivor Series (1990) rather than this one. Consider asking the protecting admin,
User:MilborneOne.
EdJohnston (
talk)
23:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
EdJohnston: Why does this article have on sysop only protection, what is the rationale behind that? It’s actually kind of ridiculous.
Wiki-Coffee
Talk
00:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The reason for full protection is usually to force a discussion. See more rationale at Talk:Survivor Series (1992)#Discussion: please support or oppose my suggestion. I don't see why I should lift MilborneOne's protection when they provided a good reason for it. You have not yet added your own comment in that talk thread. EdJohnston ( talk) 00:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
EdJohnston: Why does this article have on sysop only protection, what is the rationale behind that? It’s actually kind of ridiculous.
Wiki-Coffee
Talk
00:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ EdJohnston: @ MilborneOne: - “The reason for full protection is usually to force a discussion” – Would it not be fair to say that the act of full protecting a page (restricting that pages editing to admins only) is de-facto removing anyone’s ability to edit the article? This action of fully protecting an article and restricting its editing to sysops only is contentious of WP:5P3. For an action, which by its nature, is contemptuous of a founding principle of Wikipedia it would seem to me that a rationale like “to force a discussion” is rather disingenuous. The action of fully protecting an article is dystopian and it is also an affront to the spirit of Wikipedia which can be surmised in its slogan “the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” It would further occur to me that in circumstances which upholding the principle that “anyone can edit” could damage Wikipedia then restrictive protections ought to be placed; however, the action of placing this protection to protect an article would be counterproductive if the reasons for instituting it did not seek to prevent damage to Wikipedia. “The reason for full protection is to force discussion” seems invariably aimed at making a point and conveying a message to editors that they must discuss before editing an article. This point could be made without affronting WP:5P3. Furthermore, by applying full protection to make a point it is disrupting other editors (whom perhaps had not been involved in the original reason for protecting the article) ability to constructively contribute towards an article. Wiki-Coffee Talk 02:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Transcluded by 300+ pages whose names are those of non-notable films. George Ho ( talk) 01:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined 300 pages is not a large enough transclusion count to be considered a "high-risk" template (i.e. pre-emptive protection), and there appears to be no history of vandalism.
Primefac (
talk)
01:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 04:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
05:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Highly visible at moment due to sporting event. WNYY98 ( talk) 04:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
05:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 05:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
05:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated by sockpuppets of Lindokuhle Modi. . Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 18:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 23:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
NeilN
talk to me
01:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Spam and unsourced info being added... TropicAces ( talk) 05:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
05:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
05:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 00:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Amortias.
Primefac (
talk)
00:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed. By the newbie admin
Amortias
NeilN
talk to me
00:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor claiming to be third-party candidate has continued pursuing their POV reverts after RfC and has indicated intent to continue edit-warring in their edit comments. Possible NLT vio's as well. . Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Edit-warring continues from multiple IP's: prev. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
This is Kurt Evans. I'm not claiming to be a third-party candidate. The Constitution Party was denied ballot access and had no U.S. Senate candidate in the 2016 election. I'm also not making "reverts" to other edits. I'm removing unsourced, false and defamatory information. My "point of view" isn't the basis for removing the information. This is a matter of straightforward legal fact. I'm also not engaging in edit-warring. I'm explaining each of my revisions, and "Eggishorn" is the one edit-warring with unexplained "reverts" of those revisions. I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's "NLT" policies, but it's true that after months and months of dealing with this garbage, I'm now planning to pursue defamation lawsuits against Wikimedia and several regular Wikipedia editors. 208.53.231.242 ( talk) 01:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- I would endorse this request and even go as far as to suggest Indefinite. This has been a long running disruption for almost a year. -- Dane talk 01:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- And your lies are what started it, Dane. —KE 208.53.231.242 ( talk) 01:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
I JethroBT
drop me a line
03:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Most edits have been reverted regularly by some similar editors. Some of the edits were vandalism or probably BLP violations. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
03:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: The article is overdue for unprotection. It's been there for a while and it appears that there is no major activity on it anymore. . Wiki-Coffee Talk 00:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Page gets unprotected tomorrow. No rush.
Primefac (
talk)
00:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Why exactly is this article protected? Why don't other dictators have the same amount of protection? Thenabster126 ( talk) 00:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined It has to do with ArbCom sanctions related to the
Arab-Israeli conflict.
Primefac (
talk)
00:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Thenabster126: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Problematic page, and now IP vandalism, removal of sourced information. Page must be protected again, we have days of ip reverts . Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 23:28, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 23:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected I have removed Pending Changes on the page, but feel free to request it be re-added if autoconfirmed editors are vandalising the page.
Primefac (
talk)
01:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: article is under full time vandalism by an IP-User with changing IP-Adress 84.148.------ User inserts wrong stuff, adding false information (pretends characters are death who clearly aren't, (verifyable source is found on tv channels pages as well as official social media pages for the serie). User does vandalism for month now, so longer protection is necessary.-- Robberey1705 ( talk) 00:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I would also consider leaving some talk page notices regarding their behaviour.
Primefac (
talk)
01:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant edits and disputes of reunion dates via vandalism. Misterpither ( talk) 19:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IPs and anonymous. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 19:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant Vandalism . MatthewTardiff 19:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the news, some controversy ... this may continue a little while. Thank you. DBaK ( talk) 20:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal is IP hopping and vandalizing . Dbrodbeck ( talk) 18:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal is IP hopping and vandalizing . Dbrodbeck ( talk) 18:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Primefac (
talk)
01:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anti vandalism pages are prone to vandalism, this is no exception. ZLEA ( Talk, Contribs) 19:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston.
NeilN
talk to me
01:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 and same person as IPv4. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 00:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
01:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: When it became semi-protected, the template was transcluded in 800–1200 pages. Currently, 3000+ transclude it, making it a high-risk template. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Ref desk troll keeps moving to a new IP to post question removed once yesterday and several times today. MarnetteD| Talk 22:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
22:28, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal or altering of reliably sourced content without explanation by IP numbers. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 22:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 2 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
23:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Warring. Jetstreamer Talk 16:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
16:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: CoI, vandalism, addition of copyrighted material and changing content without references. Uamaol ( talk) 16:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Charlieandthebhoys (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
NeilN.
Mifter (
talk)
17:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias ( T)( C) 20:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
22:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
21 February 2017
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected
Mifter (
talk)
06:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
08:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected
Mifter (
talk)
06:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
08:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - The Magnificentist 11:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 11:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased vandalism and SPA. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not vandalism and registered editors are not SPAs
NeilN
talk to me
14:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Intermittent vandalism from IP-changing user(s), including repeated addition of hoaxes. Modernponderer ( talk) 15:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection
Persistent reinsertion of unsourced roles by IP's despite being constantly reverted and the page already having been page protected due to their activity. This started up again just 60minutes after the previous protection expired. Requesting month long semi as this has been going on some time and the IP is clearly not interested in sourcing their additions or addressing the concerns. It's purely disruptive and they need some time off but have a wide Ip range preventing a block request. SephyTheThird ( talk) 16:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Doraemon the Movie 2017: Great Adventure in the Antarctic Kachi Kochi ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection
Persistent insertion of an unverified role (and minor, if they exist) by IP who has been causing issues on related pages recently. Has been going on for weeks. SephyTheThird ( talk) 16:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Often vandalized by anonymous by changing or adding false information. Tiktomoro ( talk) 16:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Often vandalized by anonymous by changing or adding false information. Tiktomoro ( talk) 16:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unsourced additions relating to an unofficial free agent signing. Trut-h-urts man ( T • C) 16:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: @
Trut-h-urts man:
This good enough?
NeilN
talk to me
17:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ NeilN: The team needs to confirm the signing, after Wieters passes a physical. The official team source states that the team hasn't confirmed the deal, so it's still pending a physical. Trut-h-urts man ( T • C) 17:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
17:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Karst ( talk) 17:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
17:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals are repeatedly inserting claims that he was an astronaut. ~barakokula31 (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
NeilN
talk to me
17:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, going back months. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page receives vandalism all the time, I believe that it should be indefinitely protected. Qaei ☎ 18:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple IP users in a single day. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 18:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
18:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just till the FA passes over. Qaei ☎ 18:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not enough disruption to justify protecting TFA
NeilN
talk to me
20:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: A persistent but not-logged-in editor (very likely blocked user Vujkovica brdo) keeps reverting to an unencyclopedic, puffed-up, and hagiographic version of the article. This has been going on since at least March 2016 when Vb first began editing the article. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No viable blocks so hopefully they'll have got the idea by then if not we can review.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
19:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive edits. One or more IP users have been changing the genre on a number of singles from the Linkin Park album The Hunting Party (album) WyrmVane ( talk) 19:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. As I understand policy as of now, we should have at least one edit which can be described as vandalism for it to be implemented. This I do not see while browsing the history of the article. If another admin wants to protect, go right ahead though.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of User:Bigshowandkane64 sockpuppetry, cursing as well. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 20:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
20:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Infrequent vandalism by IPs over a few years. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║ Contributions) 20:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
NeilN
talk to me
20:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – PC not deterring team change edits, trade not official until march 9 at earliest . WNYY98 ( talk) 20:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Trade rumors. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Oshwah.
NeilN
talk to me
20:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of User:Bigshowandkane64 sockpuppetry, cursing as well. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 20:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
20:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – too much activity for PC due to trade rumors . WNYY98 ( talk) 21:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: See [36]. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 21:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Page has only been moved once. Not enough blatant abuse and at high enough of a rate to justify protection at this time.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
23:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Fi9193 ( talk) 22:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I somehow doubt the notability of the subject, btw.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Repeatedly vandalized by possible same individual who creates new accounts regularly to become autoconfirmed. Jake.hoffer ( talk) 22:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous vandals haven't been auto-confirmed so semi-protection should resolve the issue
Amortias (
T)(
C)
23:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. requires autoconfirmed to create
Amortias (
T)(
C)
23:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses/accounts due to ongoing football match. Pinkshrimp ( talk) 21:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of episodes section by dynamic IP. Alex|The|Whovian ? 02:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Homeostasis07 ( talk) 15:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
15:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 09:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see some vandalism, but some good-faith edits as well. Allin all not enough for semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Link spamming from multiple IPs . Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Very, very slow.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive whitespace flipping / edit warring from IP and account explicitly not allowed per WP:SECTIONS , WP:WHITE Talk:Ubuntu#Whitespace . Widefox; talk 14:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not "disruptive editing" if multiple editors revert each other over such issues but edit-warring. Reach consensus on the talk page, then request unprotection.
So
Why
15:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - The Magnificentist 07:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 11:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
12:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's the week before the East Anglian derby, and this page always gets high levels of vandalism, so PC will be insufficient. Please semi-protect until at least Sunday (the day of the match). Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Height and weight have been changed and reverted repeatedly over the past few days. LM2000 ( talk) 09:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long history of being protected on and off.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past 50 revisions consisted almost exclusively of vandalism and their reversions. Lordtobi ( ✉) 11:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: “The reason for full protection is usually to force a discussion” – Would it not be fair to say that the act of full protecting a page (restricting that pages editing to admins only) is de-facto removing anyone’s ability to edit the article? This action of fully protecting an article and restricting its editing to sysops only is contentious of WP:5P3. For an action, which by its nature, is contemptuous of a founding principle of Wikipedia it would seem to me that a rationale like “to force a discussion” is rather disingenuous. The action of fully protecting an article is dystopian and it is also an affront to the spirit of Wikipedia which can be surmised in its slogan “the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” It would further occur to me that in circumstances which upholding the principle that “anyone can edit” could damage Wikipedia then restrictive protections ought to be placed; however, the action of placing this protection to protect an article would be counterproductive if the reasons for instituting it did not seek to prevent damage to Wikipedia. “The reason for full protection is to force discussion” seems invariably aimed at making a point and conveying a message to editors that they must discuss before editing an article. This point could be made without affronting WP:5P3. Furthermore, by applying full protection to make a point it is disrupting other editors (whom perhaps had not been involved in the original reason for protecting the article) ability to constructively contribute towards an article. Wiki-Coffee Talk 02:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already unprotected by administrator
MilborneOne. The question raised above might better be discussed at
WP:PP.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pending changes not working . WNYY98 ( talk) 03:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined It looks like PC is doing its job. The edit rate is low any vandalism/issues are being handled.
Mifter (
talk)
06:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by new user. Royals Life 03:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
06:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious sock puppetry; See this diff. -- Dane talk 05:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
06:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Mifter: Warned again - however obvious multiple accounts owned by the same user (1 IP on Feb 2nd; 2 Users on Feb 5 and Feb 21) over multiple days this month, I think the article itself needs protection since both IPs and multiple accounts are involved. -- Dane talk 06:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hoping IP continued disruptive editing. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Also consider reporting to AIV or AN/I if the edit rate picks up.
Mifter (
talk)
05:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: Frequently substituted and used. Also, last edit was 2014, and the former content was moved into Module:Requested move. The current content is simplified to interact with the module. George Ho ( talk) 21:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template. and Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Mifter (
talk)
05:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marlin Setia1 ( talk) 21:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Mifter (
talk)
05:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs repeatedly adding the surprising and unsourced claim that this minor British comedian was "rated among the top ten best comics in Britain by the Stage newspaper". This is a low traffic article with few IP edits other than this repeated one. McGeddon ( talk) 21:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
05:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
05:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
protection: - Users removing birthdata same problem as previously.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 23:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
06:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disrupting editing by The TV Boy. This user has a long history of unacceptable behaviour including but not limited to edit warring, breaking the three-revert rule, vandalism, harassing and threatening other users, trolling football-related pages, speaking on behalf of admins without their knowledge and permission.
His newest field of activity is
Vivacom Arena Georgi Asparuhov. Being a supporter of a rival club he wants to impose an illogical title that sounds stupid. The stadium was known as Georgi Asparuhov Stadium until recently when the name of the principal sponsor
Vivacom was added. Due to fan pressure, the club decided to combine a commercial and non-commercial name, thus, instead of Vivacom Arena the stadium was called Vivacom Arena Georgi Asparuhov. The names of the football venues, including the
sponsored ones contain either arena or stadium but not both. Because of his history of counterproductive behaviour I'm asking TV Boy to be blocked from editing this article and the troll page
Vivacom Arena - Georgi Asparuhov Stadium to be deleted.--
Ivo (
talk)
00:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Also, please be mindful of
WP:CIVIL and
WP:NPA
Mifter (
talk)
06:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, vandalism or WP:ADVOCACY (hard to tell which) by prob. repeat offender appearing once as Ban Cattle Ropeing. - Brianhe ( talk) 01:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
06:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – semi protection not stopping team change edits...id say keep it this way until the trade is officially announced. WNYY98 ( talk) 17:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
22:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip.s are creating mess in this article, nationalistic chaos, page should be protected as this article topic is "hot" for several days now. Protect article. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 18:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
05:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Closable Rfc templates
- Template:Rfc top ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Rfc bottom ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Transclusion amount without substitution is 500+. More likely the usage will increase. -- George Ho ( talk) 20:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template. Not really a target for vandalism, further the template is primarily internal facing so even in the unlikely event something were to happen it would be reverted quickly and not directly appear to readers.
Mifter (
talk)
05:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has a 3-month history of persistent disruption from an IP trying to reinstall a hagiography rejected by all other editors (at least 5 including me); this continues a more slow-motion campaign to install similar material that had gone on for many months before that. Given the persistence of the IP/IPs I suggest semiprotection for 3-6 months. There's almost no other editing on the article, BTW. E Eng 20:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
05:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users repeatedly changing subject's gender pronouns. Brycehughes ( talk) 20:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
05:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Note: Persistent POV disruptive editing by revert-only account, explanation has been provided on talk page. -- MehrdadFR ( talk) 19:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
07:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring and refusal to join talk page discussion by unregistered IP hopper. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 06:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template protection, to be consistent with {{ Proposed deletion/dated}}. — Train2104 ( t • c) 19:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done Downgraded to template-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Vandalized by several TFD IPs over the last few days. Not previously protected, but this vandal customarily returns to protected articles after the protection expires. -- Finngall talk 19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – pending demarcus cousins trade drawing disruptive edits . WNYY98 ( talk) 20:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of recent unconstructive editing from anons/new users. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Despite repeated indefinite blocks, someone creates a new user ID every few months to vandalize this high-quality article, with libelous criminal allegations against a living person. If you're also able to block the new user ID (HoleINSixGolfa) and suppress the libelous content (the article's two versions dated 20 February 2017), even better. — Patrug ( talk) 04:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 05:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Mifter (
talk)
06:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding death date and he is not dead, as well as other vandalism. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 21:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of anons making questionable edits about various facts. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 21:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
MIDI. -
Mifter (
talk)
05:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Gabucho181 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) found a way around their indef and is bouncing IPs to add their usual " Dan Vs. is replacing this show" noise. Nate • ( chatter) 21:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ★Trekker ( talk) 21:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No useful IP edits in last 2 days, and 3 disruptive IPs in that time. Enough to warrant a few days semi-protection. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 21:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Vandalized by several different TFD IPs today. Not previously protected, but this vandal customarily returns to protected articles after the protection expires. -- Finngall talk 22:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC) BOI THIS ALL is weird stuff but seems like a cool article
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 23:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – pending trade not official until march 9 . WNYY98 ( talk) 23:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Amortias. -
Mifter (
talk)
06:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – trade rumors, recommend protection until march 9 especially if traded (date it would become official). WNYY98 ( talk) 23:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Severe vandalism from IP-changing user(s), including repeated addition of hoaxes. Modernponderer ( talk) 23:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Personal computer was just protected due to disruptive editing. Rather than engaging on the talk page, the edit warring IPs have just moved to edit warring the same content into Desktop computer. MrOllie ( talk) 00:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant deletion of negative reviews of the series. Alex|The|Whovian ? 01:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
06:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, and puppetmaster has indicated more exist. ECP will discourage further disruptive edits from more socks, as previous socks have simply made enough edits to become autoconfirmed. MereTechnicality ⚙ 14:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 169 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Current event so it needs a few days [37]. Also as its still BLP, THIS will need removing. Lihaas ( talk) 18:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC) 18:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done
Mifter (
talk)
05:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: Regular target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Vandalized by several TFD IPs over the last few days. Most recent semi- was for a full year. -- Finngall talk 19:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article appears to have been relatively quiet since the protection expired (excluding now), no need to lock long-term at present.
Mifter (
talk)
05:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot if IP vandalism that needs reverting recently. JMHamo ( talk) 20:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
05:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – cousins trade not official yet . WNYY98 ( talk) 17:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
01:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – cousins trade not official yet. WNYY98 ( talk) 19:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
01:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – angry kings fans regarding cousins trade . WNYY98 ( talk) 20:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
02:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated threats from new accounts. Fabrickator ( talk) 22:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
00:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Address' keep assaulting this page. We really need this to go through. Aaryan33056 ( talk) 16:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- What would I look like if I was run over by a steamroller? ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. 2605:6000:ED08:DD00:DD98:F640:EF64:34A2 ( talk) 18:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mz7 (
talk)
19:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP numbers and red accounts are removing reliably sourced content from the Sweden section of this article. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
22:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 23:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should be long enough for heads to cool off.
Tabercil (
talk)
23:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
22 February 2017
Indefinite semi-protection Disruptive edits: The list's indefinite semi-protection was replaced by sock puppetry protection. That expired just recently. Can the original indefinite semi protection be re-applied? The list constantly attracts anonymous IPs who make continuous disruptive edits.-- Harout72 ( talk) 02:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Kudpung.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – trade report leading to unsourced changes of team. WNYY98 ( talk) 00:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the moment, pending-changes does not seem sufficient. @
Oshwah:...sorry for slightly overriding you here.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Lectonar - No apologies needed. Do whatever you feel is best :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism form anon IP using similar comments. Previous vandal reverts by user:Ivanvector implies this is block evasion by User:Fangusu, but I can not speak to that. I will update user:Ivanvector. KNHaw (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – subject of unconfirmed basketball trade . WNYY98 ( talk) 01:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too heavy editing for pending changes to be effective.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IExistToHelp ( talk) 01:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mz7 (
talk)
04:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 02:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Users involved are blocked. Only one disruptive edit has been made in two days, in which no edits were made at all. Protection doesn't appear justified at this time.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Gabucho181 ( talk · contribs) IP socks with this as traditional target recent rash. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current target of IP socks of Gabucho181 ( talk · contribs) adding hoax info. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done I applied semi protection for 24 hours. I think this duration is appropriate for now, since no length was provided with the request.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. - The Magnificentist 03:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Would like to have temporary protection of the page during GA review over the next week to avoid disruptive IP edits. Shaded0 ( talk) 04:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
07:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike ( talk) 07:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP linkspam . Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Persistent distruptive editing, but with some constructive edits. 219.79.180.93 ( talk) 07:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. Indeed, there seem to be a lot of
productive edits from IPs. I'd rather keep it open, for now.
El_C
07:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Emotions related pages
- Fun ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hatred ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Suffering ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Emotion ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sadness ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: There is a lot of IPv4 and IPv6 vandalism. In some of them there is also, user vandalism. Some of the articles if the article history is looked properly, it will show that some of the pages have vandalism going back for a long time. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold ( talk) 08:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined None of these pages have recent disruptive activity or at a rate that justifies protection at this time.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
09:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over weeks and months by new users, probably socks, and occasionally IPs. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 08:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
09:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 09:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
El_C
09:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced pod title. Alex|The|Whovian ? 09:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request a change in protection level from Pending Changes: autoconfirmed to a more permanent level that does not require the input of editors to reject the constant attempts to remove valid, referenced information from this article. A quick look at the article's history will show that "Pending Changes" isn't really appropriate - semi-protection is the best option for this article. . Exemplo347 ( talk) 10:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
10:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism since elections. Perhaps a month long protection. I made this request earlier today but it was deleted with no explaination. —አቤል ዳዊት ? (Janweh64) ( talk) 10:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Sensitive time for The Gambia, but I think we can manage.
El_C
11:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing recommenced as soon as the last month of semi-protection had expired. Don't know whether a longer period of protection or permanent pending changes would work better here. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
11:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vanamonde ( talk) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
12:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP disruption. Would like to start at 3 months and take it from there. -- Somedifferentstuff ( talk) 11:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
11:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant reversion of unsourced info added by IP. Nördic Nightfury 11:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP edits. JohnBlackburne words deeds 12:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
12:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, removal of AfD template continuing since ending of previous protection. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 14:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
14:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase in vandalism due to TimesofIsrael blog article about this. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary.
NeilN
talk to me
14:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)- Question: @
Sir Joseph: How are you not edit warring against the closed RfC and asking for your preferred version to be protected?
NeilN
talk to me
14:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm trying to keep it as consensus. There was then article written about "antisemitism on Wikipedia" and these accounts are now coming to vandalize the page. Debresser and others are trying to converse with these editors but they blindly revert. (I also disagree with the closure, the closer misunderstood the question and it's clear that ALL Jews can't be labeled as Middle Eastern. Judaism is from the Middle East, but individual Jews are from wherever they are. I for example, am not from the ME, why would my page list me as ME descent then?) Sir Joseph (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After restoring article to version specified by RFC which was upheld on review.
Sir Joseph, I strongly suggest you read
WP:GAME
NeilN
talk to me
15:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is vandalized twice or thrice every day this article isn't protected. It's been protected almost ten times in the last several years. I recommend keeping this semi-protected for at least a few years this time. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
NeilN
talk to me
16:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of silly vandalism of late. As the console is due in under two weeks, 2-3 weeks of semi would be appreciated (would do myself but am active on page). MASEM ( t) 15:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Until March 4th
NeilN
talk to me
16:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 16:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
16:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- 1990'sguy ( talk) 16:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month
NeilN
talk to me
16:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent attempts to create this page and that of his company SeventySix Capital (now salted) by multiple accounts. Also submitted to AfC under the name Wayne Douglas Kimmel. Blythwood ( talk) 16:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Subject of article appears to be routinely attempting to scrub it of content they consider "defamatory", regardless of relevance, compliance, suitability within Wikipedia guidelines, etc. 131.137.245.208 ( talk) 16:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
17:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Many IPs are adding large revenue increases without sources. Prolific on many recent Hindi-language films which are whitelocked. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 17:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, the article is currently under pending changes and so far there is no evidence that the disruption is so intense that we should exclude IPs from editing at all.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP edits with marketing claims. New RFPP try due to editing errors on my part. MikeTango ( talk) 17:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 8 IPs/unconfirmed bad edits in the last 6 days. They never use the talk page to follow the law re: consensus, and they always make unsourced edits. I'd still rather FULL for 6 or 8 months till all this stupidity dies downs. Beyoncé and Jay Z my foot. . L3X1 My Complaint Desk 17:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. Boleyn ( talk) 17:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for two weeks, and set to allow only autoconfirmed users.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated vandalism page. Citobun ( talk) 17:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LouisAragon ( talk) 17:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unexplained vandalism. Quasar G. ( talk) 18:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I would recommend 6 months, due to political climate, vandalism may die down by then. Can always reinstate if that is not the case. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 18:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Maile66.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I just did this while Oshwah was posting. This is a high profile article, and it was Pending Changes protected since 2015, which resolved nothing. Just about every IP edit for years has been reverted for vandalism.
— Maile (
talk)
19:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Daily disruptive edits, inserting of wrong data and edit warring by IPs and single-purpose accounts Snowflake91 ( talk) 18:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Creation protection: Repeatedly recreated after meeting speedy deletion criteria as spam and non-notable. GSMR ( talk) 18:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
19:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The festival is later this week, with the article seeing a spike in traffic. IPs adding advertisement links, unsourced content etc. Requesting an appropriate semi. A week, or till March 2 should suffice. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 18:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Mass vandalism of bitter fans due to the outcome of the awards. Snowflake91 ( talk) 18:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
19:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Just a day after lifting the protection the disruptive editing began again. The Banner talk 19:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - Only one IP is making changes to the article, and the issue appears content-related or over things that can be discussed / educated with the user. Protection is not a way to get one user's attention; it's used as a result to stop disruption by multiple users and at a rate that justifies its use.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Enforce Office Action. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║ Contributions) 19:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done One edit 2 years ago when it was unblanked and quickly reverted. -
GB
fan
19:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Two IPs repeatedly blanking article content and one making a legal threat; likely to be blocked user User:Palkanetoijala returning again. McGeddon ( talk) 20:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note, previous protection expired February 3rd. --
ferret (
talk)
20:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP vandalism by multiple editors continued immediately after protection expired. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 21:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely.
Vanamonde (
talk)
03:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║ Contributions) 22:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
22:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For 3 to 6 days, continuous edit war by a single IP editor and much unexplained controversial editing. ApprenticeFan work 23:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
00:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is currently an edit dispute going on at Teresa May, concerning whether the page should remain redirected to Theresa May, or instead have it become a disambiguation page (despite the fact that we already have Theresa May (disambiguation), rendering such a new dab superfluous). The persistent reverting back and forth has to stop, pending a consensus (i.e. at Talk:Theresa May) for a change to the status quo. -- Nevé – selbert 23:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
00:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 1 day. It seemse that he did something, and a lot of IPs and unconfirmed users are adding unsourced content to the article. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 23:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quasar G. ( talk) 23:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Mifter (
talk)
00:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Over ten acts of vandalism recently in the month of February by IP users, including some serious BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 01:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
01:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 01:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
01:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – subject of currently unofficial NBA trade leading to team change edits. WNYY98 ( talk) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations –involved in same trade as splitter, similar team change edits. WNYY98 ( talk) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-term vandalism target . WNYY98 ( talk) 02:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
02:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of a redundant genre (mecha is a subset of science fiction) by an Indian IP from a cellular broadband service. Latest edits removed a citation that was added to support the mecha genre. . — Farix ( t | c) 02:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
02:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalize from random IPs and new accounts over the last couple of days. — Farix ( t | c) 02:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
03:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
23 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – team changes. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced anon edits due to manager being sacked. JMHamo ( talk) 20:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued, almost-daily addition of unsourced content (pay-per-view figures) throughout the whole month. Always by the same 129.xx IP, and previously a user who was indef blocked. My last RPP request was denied on the basis of a content dispute, but this should not apply—there is nothing to dispute about the insertion of completely unsourced content, week after week. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 21:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of non notable persons by multiple accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits due to being sacked today from Leicester City. JMHamo ( talk) 20:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Mattythewhite. --
ferret (
talk)
20:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has trying to push multi thousand byte deletion since last year. 2 or 3 months please. Thanks. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 20:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
20:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Heavy vandalism. Pending changes is overly optimistic for the most contentious sports figure in the US. Lizard ( talk) 20:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
20:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 15:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – trade rumors leading to team change edits. WNYY98 ( talk) 15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 2 reverts in 2 days.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be an edit war on this article with the editor violating 3RR and refusing to build consensus on the talk page. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 15:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 17:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
19:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One editor, using a long list of IP addresses, keeps making the same disruptive edits, over and over, and does not respond to requests that he stop. Semi-protection seems the only route to stop him. The Old Jacobite The '45 17:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
ferret (
talk)
19:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle related vandalism, plus the news of the recent exoplanet discoveries. Safiel ( talk) 19:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a premature trade. Kante4 ( talk) 17:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a premature trade. Kante4 ( talk) 17:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a premature trade. Kante4 ( talk) 17:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Nothing but vandalism for months. Started up again after last protection ended. Possibly one person, but using multiple new accounts. Meters ( talk) 19:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus some PC. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
19:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated disruption from sockpuppets. Exemplo347 ( talk) 17:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – enough to salt?. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after previous semi-protection expired. Mélencron ( talk) 18:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and then pending changes for another month after that. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing and edit warring. Several IPs and a new user continuously added a unsourced full name ( Special:Diff/766824098, Special:Diff/766946754, Special:Diff/766950504, Special:Diff/766951052, Special:Diff/766995651). However, I can't find a source to verify it. Gyakusyuu no Amanojaku ( talk) 11:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Article is at AfD and disruption is not very heavy.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA ( Talk, Contribs) 13:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last edit on february 14th.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article's been the subject of some recent & persistent IP vandalism from either a single changing IP or multiple users. Pishcal ( talk) 16:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Coffee.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
18:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted twice this month. Boleyn ( talk) 16:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: WP:DISRUPTIVE. Strebe ( talk) 08:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. It's already on the edit-warring noticeboard.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Request increased protection against vandalism from IP-numbers and newly registered users. Reason: persistent, visible vandalism. -- S Khemadhammo ( talk) 09:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just one user recently (and even their edits do not necessarily constitute vandalism); apart from that, not much activity.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, Lectonar. But I am a bit confused. Are we looking at the same article? The article has had a large number of vandalism or disruptive edits, starting from the moment Luang Por was widely reported in English press, that is from 19 February onward. I have listed the edits below. Most of them are just adding random Thai or English text, or deleting a large part of the page. I request a temporary increase of protection for as long as the temple and its abbot are widely reported in the news, to protect the quality of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766518386
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766519053
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766519429
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766519677
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766519973
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766520026
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766520192
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766520298
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766520392
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766623787
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766987947
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Luang_Por_Dhammajayo&oldid=766988335 -- S Khemadhammo ( talk) 10:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Answered on user's talkpage. Lectonar ( talk) 10:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by an IP. Not a content dispute: Jones is not recognised by any credible media outlet as a five-weight world champion, which is what the IP keeps pushing. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 15:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – great majority of anon edits are vandalism, highly visible. WNYY98 ( talk) 05:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Rash of IPs making false claims about the subjects lovers and sexuality - Arjayay ( talk) 12:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Spate of vandalism from diverse IPs and new user. Rivertorch FIRE WATER 13:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. More than a spate...
Lectonar (
talk)
13:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect until at least Sunday, the day of the East Anglian derby. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen attacks. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 08:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen attacks. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 08:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen attacks. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 08:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Frequent and persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy despite repeated semi-protection FoxSerfaty ( talk) 04:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
05:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism, highly visible . WNYY98 ( talk) 05:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
05:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Her criticism of conservatives has turned into a target for trolls. JDDJS ( talk) 05:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Unsure that this disambiguation page needed to be semi-protected. The user who set the status is no longer active, and the status seems to have been put in place due to a minor edit war between confirmed users (so, not sure what it accomplished) on 17th/18th/19th of Nov 2009. — al-Shimoni ( talk) 22:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Imeriki al-Shimoni: It's a
Nangparbat (who is still active) target. Shall we try pending changes and see what happens? --
NeilN
talk to me
23:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. —
al-Shimoni (
talk)
23:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. —
al-Shimoni (
talk)
23:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: IP vandalism going back months, the last drop in page protection saw vandalism pick up again. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 04:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
05:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Little bit confused as to why my request was archived and then upgraded to full protection. Said offending user which was the source of the issue has be given a softblock and myself and another user are attempting to improve the article, which we cannot do so when it has full protection. I requested "Extended confirmed protection" in the first place to prevent sock puppets and said CoI user from making vandalising. Now it's pointless, even more so the current protection level. Read said users talk page, I gave them enough warnings... Uamaol ( talk) 03:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Ronhjones: Lectonar ( talk) 12:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- When there appears to be an edit war, full protection is the norm. At the time of finding the article, I had no idea who was being disruptive, there were just too many reverts - so the usual thing is to stop the editing. I'll change it to ECP. There are quite a few tickets at OTRS, it's not going to go away easily... Ronhjones (Talk) 16:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done Downgraded to ecp.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Request indefinite extended confirmed protection, we've tried temporary many times and it's failed. MB298 ( talk) 04:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Never mind, the matter has been dealt with. MB298 ( talk) 04:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Procedural.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Over ten acts of vandalism recently in the month of February by IP users, including some serious BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 01:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
01:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 01:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
01:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – subject of currently unofficial NBA trade leading to team change edits. WNYY98 ( talk) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations –involved in same trade as splitter, similar team change edits. WNYY98 ( talk) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-term vandalism target . WNYY98 ( talk) 02:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
02:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of a redundant genre (mecha is a subset of science fiction) by an Indian IP from a cellular broadband service. Latest edits removed a citation that was added to support the mecha genre. . — Farix ( t | c) 02:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
02:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalize from random IPs and new accounts over the last couple of days. — Farix ( t | c) 02:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
02:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 ( talk) 03:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
03:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
24 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent additional of content by editor with clear conflict of interest. Boomer Vial Holla! We gonna ball! 08:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected After mulling it over, I have additionately configured indefinite pending-changes protection; this is a recurring problem since at least 2016.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit history shows that subject or his employer is censoring sourced content. This can not be tolerated. Valentina Cardoso ( talk) 11:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
12:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip editor has developed a dislike for this redirect. If it's protected for a short time, perhaps they will lose interest. Onel5969 TT me 11:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
12:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There appears to be some people who keep messing with this page, it seems to have diminished now but with the possibility of it continuing, i would be happy if the page was semi-protected so that way no IP that just joined or account that was just created can vandalize right after creation. Thank you and have a nice day! Wikipediauser123456 ( talk) 01:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Wikipediauser123456: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. As you said, the disruption has stopped for now. ~
Rob13
Talk
04:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting one week temporary protection, PC or semi to stop the disruptive editing occurring. The election is next Thursday so it would help to have the protection extended until Friday. st 170 e 02:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. It's all one IP who's been doing the vandalizing. They've now received a final warning. If it happens again, they can just be blocked. ~
Rob13
Talk
04:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 02:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. ~
Rob13
Talk
04:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP Users. TheDeviantPro ( talk) 07:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello ( talk) 08:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Sock is back after a 3 week hiatus, and is now fake blocking me. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 14:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: IP has already been blocked. --
ferret (
talk)
14:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ L3X1:...if you still want protection, ping me. Lectonar ( talk) 15:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
08:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 06:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 06:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple accounts. I've tried to restore a decent version, but there may still be some bugs. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
04:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A review of recent edits show that this article attracts vandalism and semi-protection is requested. It should enjoy the same level of protection as its nearest cousins in the articles "Domestic dog" and "Gray wolf". William Harris • (talk) • 04:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
04:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I Told You I Was Trouble: Live in London ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information. snapsnap ( talk) 05:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ SnapSnap: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
06:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Actually,
SnapSnap, this is a content dispute. Including runtimes with tracks is not against any style guide. It is a matter of editorial discretion. Run times can be sourced to the album itself if it includes that information, similar to the plot of a movie. Discuss this on the talk page. ~
Rob13
Talk
06:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and registered user adding a load of promo + edit war. The Banner talk 15:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- One of the editors involved in the disruptive editing is a registered user, so semi-protection will not work. The Banner talk 15:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Then pending-changes also wouldn't work; semi-protection will take care of IPs and fresh users, the registered user can be dealt with in other form(s):
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Ssemi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism started up again almost immediately after previous protection expired . Sro23 ( talk) 01:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
-
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Mz7 (
talk)
02:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Frequent IP Vandalism LikeASatellite ( talk) 01:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Tabercil (
talk)
03:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GAB gab 02:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated anon edits from multiple IPs messing with references and citations in nonsensical ways. Reil ( talk) 21:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
00:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quasar G. ( talk) 00:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sro23 ( talk) 00:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
K6ka..
MelanieN (
talk)
01:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:EF/R#Sarah Paulson. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 18:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Appears to only be a single IP who made two edits. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just won't stop. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 18:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Appears to be one person using two accounts and an IP. The disruption has since stopped. Report again if it resumes. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been vandalized multiple times over the past year or so. Dolotta ( talk) 19:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. ~
Rob13
Talk
19:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
23:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 23:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see above. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see above. WNYY98 ( talk) 20:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ★Trekker ( talk) 21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jeez. This guy.
- Treker, if you see this "wolf, not a cat" nonsense on any other pages let me know and I'll protect. NeilN talk to me 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will, it's driving me insane. ★Trekker ( talk) 22:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been blocked twice in the past and controversy about sources continues with persistent changes/reverts. Jake Brockman ( talk) 21:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And PC 1 year.
NeilN
talk to me
21:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
25 February 2017
Semi-protection: Repeatedly unsourced edit warring with newly created users.( T)
- Declined Semi-protection would be one-sided here, and I'm not sure this rises to the level of EC or full protection: disruption is not severe, and the edits appear to be in good faith.
Vanamonde (
talk)
15:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Transcluded onto a protected page. . Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 16:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - Page deleted as inappropriate split. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
20:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more integer monkeying by IPs with grossings. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 14:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I know this was declined by YMblanter a few days ago, but I would like to respectfully disagree. The trend that I have seen (so far) is that during the first month or so of the popularity of a Hindi film, IPs will come one nearly daily to change the profit amount (in either direction) without providing a source. This clogs up the PCR logs and the page history, because I always have to revert it to do lack of sources. If this is declined again, I will accept it and not bring this article forward for SEMI again. Thank you. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 14:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The
pending changes protection currently in place seems to be working just fine. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I am requesting for a semi protection, being the creator of this article, because of persistent changes of formatting and partly deletions without discussion by unknown IP-User with multiple accounts [2605:6000:ef43:8500:b510:3d30:60d1:area3]. I am interested in standardized format according to all other national records in athletic pages. Thank you for comment if it is possible to protect or not. 2.247.244.49 ( talk) 13:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: you are aware that if semi-protected this would also prevent you from editing this article
Amortias (
T)(
C)
13:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- I hope a timed protection will stop the issue. I dont't know other way to protect. Unfortunately i tried with revert but was immediately involved in an edit war. So now my creation account is blocked for 72 hours - after thousends of edits in past years... There are no edits to expected in next weeks cause this side is updated. 2.247.244.49 ( talk) 14:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
14:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
18:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I am requesting for a semi protection, being the creator of this article because I am anticipating high levels of IP vandalism in the coming days as the series of the phenomenal love team of the Philippines, AlDub will start. I am aware that there are people who will make errors on my article by putting wrong information of ratings, etc which was happened 4 days ago even the series didn't started yet. As a creator of this article, I want registered user who will supply correct information on this page. I hope my request would be granted. Thank you very much. Leo kingston ( talk) 13:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
13:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is currently being vandalized. But why is anonymous edits are allowed here anyway?. Codename Lisa ( talk) 14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. We do have constructive IP editors who report non constructive editors both IP and registered hence the lack of protection.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
14:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One or more IP-hoppers repeatedly (see page history) adding unsourced right-wing propaganda to the article, claiming that it is the 'rape capital of the world', a claim that isn't supported by any reliable sources... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and pending changes for a month, as it's doubtful this will go away quickly. ~
Rob13
Talk
17:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection:
High-risk template – Currently being vandalized. Used on 998 articles; the impact of careless editing can be catastrophic.
Codename Lisa (
talk)
13:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
71.3.127.252 (
talk ·
contribs).
El_C
14:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- So, forget the IP and focus on the rest of the request. —
Codename Lisa (
talk)
14:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
14:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- In fairness, only the one ip was involved. El_C 16:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- So, forget the IP and focus on the rest of the request. —
Codename Lisa (
talk)
14:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 16:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
17:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 17:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
17:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changing the logo. Kazaro ( talk) 09:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
15:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changing the logo from the unregistered users. Kazaro ( talk) 09:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
15:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kellymoat ( talk) 15:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see the justification for EC: the disruptive editors are not autoconfirmed.
Vanamonde (
talk)
15:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Kellymoat also listed this dispute on AN3. El_C 15:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel ( talk) 15:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
15:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP issues by IP editors. Justin15w ( talk) 15:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
16:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 12:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
13:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is frequently vandalised by anonymous by giving nonsense info and frequently reverted to the vandalised revision by anonymous. Tiktomoro ( talk) 14:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
14:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of the same unsourced claims - first IP was given a short block, new account is on level 4 warning and 3RR, so a new IP is adding the same material - patently gaming the system - Arjayay ( talk) 14:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
14:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ El C: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving... Bot is confused.
NeilN
talk to me
15:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Borderline-incoherent legal threats from User:Palkanetoijala again. McGeddon ( talk) 15:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Per user's request. There is no need for anyone, including me, to edit my user page, as all the content is stored on a subpage. epicgenius ( talk) 16:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Originally declined. We don't fully protect user pages unless there's a specific need to.
NeilN
talk to me
22:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: There is a specific need as there has been recent vandalism on my user page. Can I have a review of this? I would like to increase the protection level.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Epicgenius: I'm not going to indefinitely fully protect because a couple users were mucking about and have now stopped. --
NeilN
talk to me
02:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: My point is that no one needs to edit it at all, and that the page is already semi-protected. Should I ask another admin to look at this? Because I'm not satisfied that user is going to stop vandalizing my page in the future. This is in no way a denial of your decision, but no one should be editing my page anyway except me, and I don't want to edit my page.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Epicgenius: If that editor doesn't stop disrupting, then report them. However another admin may process this report. --
NeilN
talk to me
02:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: Thanks for the guidance.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Epicgenius: Concur with NeilN. Let us know of any further issues and we'll see what we can do. El_C 02:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: Thanks for the guidance.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Epicgenius: If that editor doesn't stop disrupting, then report them. However another admin may process this report. --
NeilN
talk to me
02:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: My point is that no one needs to edit it at all, and that the page is already semi-protected. Should I ask another admin to look at this? Because I'm not satisfied that user is going to stop vandalizing my page in the future. This is in no way a denial of your decision, but no one should be editing my page anyway except me, and I don't want to edit my page.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Epicgenius: I'm not going to indefinitely fully protect because a couple users were mucking about and have now stopped. --
NeilN
talk to me
02:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: There is a specific need as there has been recent vandalism on my user page. Can I have a review of this? I would like to increase the protection level.
epicgenius (
talk)
02:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I have left notes requesting explanations from the editors who edited your userpage. For now, that should do. If this continues to be a problem, I'll happily review this decision. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Near daily vandalism, very unlikely the controversy around him will change. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Will keep am eye though.
El_C
08:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Physician ( talk) 08:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
08:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 10:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
11:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated. ★Trekker ( talk) 12:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. ECP'd as at least one of the creators has been auto-confirmed.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
12:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 06:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 06:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Also:
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
08:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Also:
Unprotection: -- 95.185.142.252 ( talk) 00:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
03:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ NeilN: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- What pressing need is there to unprotect the redirect? El_C 05:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined No rationale provided for unprotection. One is unlikely to exist. ~
Rob13
Talk
05:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Full Protection: Vandalism - removal of a group member despite that member stating repeatedly they are still a member of the group (sourced); called "delusional" for adding him back into a group he and the group says he is in. It's probably the same anti who has been continuously smearing him on other social platforms, so I don't think they'll ever stop making false edits to remove him. 68.48.199.201 ( talk) 16:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping vandal again, long history of protection. Sro23 ( talk) 06:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
El_C. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: or pending changes. Most of the recent edits are unproductive.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
26 February 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Almost immediately after the last protection had ended the same IP-hopper returned. Sro23 ( talk) 19:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP hopping vandalism/unsourced content and edit warring. 172.58.40.193 ( talk) 20:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, protected previously but is still being vandalized. RileyBugz Yell at me | Edits 20:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
21:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Because of banned user of Joanna Gunadi. — Luis Angel ( talk) 02:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I hope it's okay for me to ask this here, but this seems like an odd request considering you just recreated this very article (along with several dozen other JG G5'd articles) and now you're asking from protection from a blocked sock master, Luis Angel? Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Luis Angel: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. Requester blocked. Admin scratching his head.
NeilN
talk to me
02:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
NeilN
talk to me
16:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
19:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: using to subst signature.DrStrauss 19:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
13:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts to add unsourced genres to the article by an mobile editor in India. — Farix ( t | c) 17:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
18:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems like some users hate this person, so they add things like "he is a scumbag". DashyGames ( talk) 18:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
18:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user has changed IP addresses for each edit today. And has attempted to make the same change prior to today. . Kellymoat ( talk) 18:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kellymoat, don't know why you asked for full protection.
NeilN
talk to me
18:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I use Twinkle. I highlighted "content dispute". Kellymoat ( talk) 18:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: recent death of one of the stars has people wanting to include "in his final role" --- i don't know how to do a "recent death" request. Kellymoat ( talk) 17:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
17:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by several IP, most of which belong to the same user. My very best wishes ( talk) 17:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Users also notified of active Arb restrictions on the topic.
Mifter (
talk)
17:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Rash of unsourced additions - After a new account was warned for 3RR, 5 different IPs have added similar unsourced material, so appears to be "gaming" the system. New account will be auto-confirmed in 35 hours, so extended confirmed protection requested as is an Indian name/caste article. - Arjayay ( talk) 17:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
17:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing adding unsourced and false information. -- Noelle De Guzman ( talk) 15:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
15:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing other's talkpage comments and using the edit summaries to curse WilliamJE. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 15:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Acroterion.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
15:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incorrect death rumors due to death of Bill Paxton. Home Lander ( talk) 16:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bbb23.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
17:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since it was unprotected a week ago. Third request so far this season, requesting a longer protection period until NBA season ends (in June). BillyBatty ( talk) 16:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of June 30, 2017, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
17:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 17:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Mifter (
talk)
17:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User request within own user space. ( t) Josve05a ( c) 19:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question: @
Josve05a: just confirming you are aware this would also prevent you from editing the page in question.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
20:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Amortias: I would suggest you protect him from his own signature, it might start growling. This is akin to asking facebook to block you from editing one’s own “about” section. Imagine that, once they implement that it will be people asking to be blocked from sending nudes of themselves in messages… then blocking one’s self from access to their ex’s profile page.
→
ὦiki-Coffee( talk to me!) ( contributions) 13:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Did not get the ping...odd. Yes, I'd like to protect againstmyself (and all other non-admins) from editing it (again), as it once was admin protected before. ( t) Josve05a ( c) 14:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Amortias: I would suggest you protect him from his own signature, it might start growling. This is akin to asking facebook to block you from editing one’s own “about” section. Imagine that, once they implement that it will be people asking to be blocked from sending nudes of themselves in messages… then blocking one’s self from access to their ex’s profile page.
→
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Controversial person in the news; spate of new SPA accounts showing up to make unsourced/poorly-sourced, often negative edits without discussion. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 07:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ El C: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Whatever you say. (I'm speaking to a bot now!) El_C 07:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
NeilN
talk to me
16:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 15:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
15:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – To end the vandalism by numerous autoconfirmed sock accounts. Sro23 ( talk) 02:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
02:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist talk| contribs 12:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done by Euryalus.
BethNaught (
talk)
13:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP users has continued to put down nonsense and gibberish words into this article. Raritydash ( talk) 13:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
13:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
13:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting a lot of silliness at the moment ... DBaK ( talk) 13:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
13:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: I have a draft for this article at User:TheMagnificentist/Bart Baker. The article was deleted multiple times before 2015 because it wasn't properly sourced. I have fixed that by adding reliable sources. - The Magnificentist 08:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected. Despite a
2nd deletion, I think we can give it another try.
El_C
13:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See also edit filter log for the page. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 18:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
Mifter (
talk)
23:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – not much reason for anons to edit this especially since it could easily become a vandalism target due to subject. WNYY98 ( talk) 04:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Request for indefinite semi-protection requiring autoconfirmed or confirmed access as par to Al-Ahbash
Since Al-Ahbash got indefinite semi-protection requiring autoconfirmed or confirmed access, the Wikipedia page about Abdullah al-Harari will bear the brunt of constant and continuous disruptive editing because it is directly related to Al-Ahbash as Abdullah al-Harari is the preacher / scholar the Al-Ahbash follow. It doesn't mean that the Al-Ahbash page will be left alone. Just recently, first 180.246.67.138 / 180.246.67.138 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) and then 36.79.65.55 / 36.79.65.55 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) made very similar edits to Abdullah al-Harari. In their edits, they improperly cited the first article by misquoting it (The article clearly states "Islamic Scholars in Somalia’s northeastern state of Puntland have condemned Shiite books allegedly loaded from Iran which tries to gain foothold in the Horn of African nation, Garowe Online reports......Books spotted in Somalia’s Puntland were largely authored by controversial cleric, Abdullahi Mohamed Yusuf (Al Harari), Sunni scholars said.") and then in the second source (a non-English one) they tried to promote Nahdlatul Ulama Online. (i.e. visiting Abdullah al-Harari's grave by chairman of Nahdlatul Ulama Online is irrelevant to this article on many levels). I am afraid such behavior will only increase in the coming days. Please, look into my request. Thank you. McKhan ( talk) 07:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ McKhan: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done (I think). Thank you. McKhan ( talk) 07:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- If the bot was endowed with sentience (and who says it dosen't?), I'm sure it would say you're welcome! El_C 08:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For a start.
El_C
08:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- List of 2017 albums ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wild Love (Cashmere Cat album) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP addresses ( namely the latest versions of one IP-hopping editor that has been reported for sockpuppetry before but has escaped being blocked) fighting over content (removing albums not in the right place despite being sourced properly from the latter; disputing over the tracks included on the latter), writing inappropriate edit summaries, oftentimes constituting personal attacks at users who have restored content they disagree with. Ss 112 21:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-List of 2017 albums
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.-Wild Love
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Started again immediately once previous protection expired. Sro23 ( talk) 06:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I already protected it for one week.
El_C
07:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP sock disruptions changing content at their whim. — IB [ Poke ] 06:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of non-incidents and poor English conventions usage by IP users. StrikeDog ( talk) 06:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
07:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual addition of factual errors by random IP editors. Boomer Vial Holla! We gonna ball! 01:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question:
Boomer Vial, is the loss now sourced properly?
NeilN
talk to me
01:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry NeilN. It slipped my mind to remove this request for protection after I realized the editor was including a citation with their edit. I'll remove it once you see this latest edit. Boomer Vial Holla! We gonna ball! 02:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done But leave this. Will keep an eye on it for next few hours.
NeilN
talk to me
02:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – To end the vandalism by numerous autoconfirmed sock accounts. Luis Angel ( talk) 02:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined No disruption on page
NeilN
talk to me
02:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Reduction in move-protection level: Please change move-protection from "sysop" to "template editor" (or lower). This was added at the same time that edit-protection was set to "autoconfirmed". Protecting admin is fairly inactive, with just one edit for all of 2016 and no edits in 2017. Thanks. -- Zyxw ( talk) 03:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
03:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding this automated comment, the current protection levels for edit and move are as specified in my request, which is to reduce the move-protection level from "sysop" to "template editor" (or lower). -- Zyxw ( talk) 03:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Reduction in move-protection level: Please change move-protection from "sysop" to "template editor" (or lower). This was added at the same time that edit-protection was set to "autoconfirmed". Protecting admin is fairly inactive, with just one edit for all of 2016 and no edits in 2017. Thanks. -- Zyxw ( talk) 03:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
03:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding this automated comment, the current protection levels for edit and move are as specified in my request, which is to reduce the move-protection level from "sysop" to "template editor" (or lower). -- Zyxw ( talk) 03:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Transcluded onto Donald Trump, a protected page. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 16:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected.
Favonian (
talk)
16:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Favonian: Actually (properly) deleted. -- NeilN talk to me 16:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Full of warring and stuff. Also, it's been subject to WP:ANI recently. I don't think ARBPIA3 applies as the category is too broad to be considered part of Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Or maybe I'm wrong. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
03:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. MereTechnicality ⚙ 03:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. because we should not generally be protecting talk pages.
Vanamonde (
talk)
04:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edits to non-compliant colours, even after revert, cannot warn IP on their talk page based on dynamic IP format. Alex|The|Whovian ? 00:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
02:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Months of POV editing, slow-motion edit warring and attempts to change the tone of whole sections of the article . Exemplo347 ( talk) 01:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
01:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP numbers, new users and red users. This makes it hard for the confirmed users to resolve on-going edit disputes. — Luis Angel ( talk) 01:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
NeilN
talk to me
01:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP numbers, new users and red users. This makes it hard for the confirmed users to resolve on-going edit disputes. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. It looks like for the most part that new editors and anons are editing somewhat constructively and as the page has such a high edit rate there is not enough activity to justify locking the page.
Mifter (
talk)
18:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Editing somewhat constructively? Surely joking? Reliably sourced content continues to be regularly removed (this just happened, for example [38]) and IP numbers continue to add Breitbart articles and other wacko sources. It is impossible to edit this article given the large number of new users and IP numbers who are intent on engaging on the same disruptive editing. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 19:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 18:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent insertion of false material claiming non existing accreditation. References are provided to the front page I'd accreditation organizations but the school is not listed with either as accredited. . John from Idegon ( talk) 18:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
23:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: for a period of 1 month. Persistent vandalism by an IP even after warnings. Page was previously protected for 3 days. mfarazbaig --mfarazbaig 20:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism / edit war. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
22:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer 22408talk to me 22:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
23:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mojoworker ( talk) 23:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
23:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Again we have an editwar. Moxy ( talk) 16:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. No activity for two days. Presumably, editors are engaged
on the talk page. Get back to us.
El_C
16:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Home Lander ( talk) 16:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Addition of information that ins't
reliably sourced by new account. Have semi'd it rather than blocking them so they can continue with the discussion on the talk page.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
17:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @ Amortias: I know you're new to being an admin and all... but, we don't usually do that. Standard procedure is that if one person is disrupting an article then that one person gets blocked (until they can be trusted to stop). We don't prevent literally millions of people from being able to edit a page to stop 1 person (or even two people). Therefore, you should reverse the protection and institute a block. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.User seems unwilling to edit in a non disruptive manner so happy to swap it out.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
17:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No recent history of edit conflicts or anything to worry about from what I can see. .
→
ὦiki-Coffee(
talk to me!) (
contributions)
15:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
Wiki-Coffee: Did you follow the instructions (highlighted in yellow) at the top of this section? --
NeilN
talk to me
15:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: Nope but thank you for showing me that, will do :).
→
ὦiki-Coffee( talk to me!) ( contributions) 15:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)- Not done
Primefac (
talk)
18:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @
NeilN: Nope but thank you for showing me that, will do :).
→
27 February 2017
- List of football clubs in England by competitive honours won ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits have recently caused a lot of disruption to the page, people have been removing honours and incorrect editing the table following the recent League Cup final. A week's protection at least would be appreciated. Mountain cirque 12:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The disruption seems to have passed and the last two IP edits have been positive.
Yaris678 (
talk)
17:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stupid to ask for protection of a redirect, but it's pretty consistent vandalism at this point. Onel5969 TT me 19:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk)
21:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – redirect vandalism . WNYY98 ( talk) 20:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Hut 8.5
21:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of new anon IP editors flooding this article. Need temporary protection to get things back under control. McDoob AU93 20:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Rain Fall 16:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
17:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Rob13
Talk
18:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Heavy edit warring by dynamic IP 31.173.8x.xxx against several others to add a dubious alleged Twitter account http://twitter.com/waltz1956. The account is unverified by Twitter and likely fake as explained in [39]. Warnings like User talk:31.173.80.107 to several of the IP addresses shortly after the edits (1 minute in the example) have no effect. PrimeHunter ( talk) 17:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
17:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've also done a two-week range block of 31.173.80.0/21. Yaris678 ( talk) 17:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Title disputed. 219.78.191.24 ( talk) 10:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I do not see the need anymore; afaiks on the talk-page, the title has been agreed upon AND is reliably sourced. Is a formal closure of the RM really necessary, when clear consensus is there?
Lectonar (
talk)
10:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent ip-hopping by blocked editor Roman Sakhan ( talk · contribs). Wario-Man ( talk) 14:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The AfD is being heavily targeted by socks of the article's creator - some sockpuppet !votes have been deleted by various people (especially those that simply duplicate the words of some other user) but it is becoming rather disruptive. A SPI is underway, but I think semi protection would still be helpful since there are good, thoughtful arguments being made both in favour of keeping and against it, and they are getting lost in the flood of sock !votes. In addition, Nsmutte has discovered the AfD, and that can lead to a lot of cleanup work for a lot of innocent bystanders. bonadea contributions talk 15:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am normally loath to protect articles at AfD, but this is purely disruptive.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and IP vandalism from anonymous users and IP addresses. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 08:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Another slew of anon drive-by BLP-violating edits misrepresenting or outright lying about what sources say about a living child. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 11:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from anonymous users and IP addresses. Use of "Qadayani" (various spellings) is deregotaory slang for Ahmadiyya Community Khavakoz ( talk) 11:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Khavakoz: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
11:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, though somewhat periodic, vandalism since February 12th targeting subject's gender. Brycehughes ( talk) 13:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-Protection - Persistent vandalism by an unrelenting sock puppeteer. Not long after this same vandal already caused the page to get protected, the vandal started doing the same as before and is showing no signs of stopping. Dark Knight 2149 04:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
05:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from account adding spam link. WikiThreatcontrol 04:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Not a very high visible page. Let the new users edit it. 219.78.191.24 ( talk) 03:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. Troubled protection history (nearly 25) on an entry about a missing minor. Continue to use the talk page for proposals.
El_C
05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk)
04:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and unsourced edits by IP users and occasional confirmed user vandalism. StrikeDog ( talk) 05:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C
05:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent events, multiple IP's adding unsourced info. Garchy ( talk) 05:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Oops, sorry wrong envelope, semi-protected 2 days
NeilN
talk to me
05:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
full-protection: Set of non-admins are continuously making edits to remove two co-founders from the article. Such omission are invalid and damaging to the quality of the article. 2607:FEA8:520:361:F574:20BD:DF3F:5214 ( talk) 02:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
NeilN
talk to me
02:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 05:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Anna Frodesiak.
NeilN
talk to me
05:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 05:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant reinsertion of copyrighted material . - Happysailor (Talk) 21:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mifter (
talk)
00:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: Non-admin is closing discussions in which he is involved, and has a history of restoring his own closures against WP:NACD. Unscintillating ( talk) 23:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
00:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Done with people edit warring over a number. BTW today it got an Oscar so there were more vandals. Tiger7890 ( talk) 05:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
05:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits that need fixing. JMHamo ( talk) 19:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Vanamonde (
talk)
03:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 01:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
03:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Please see Talk:Jehovah's_Witnesses/Archive_62#IP_Block for the consensus. Also see the recent history, where not only disruptive IP address edits are daily made, but also regular ones from brand-new single-purpose accounts (at least semi-protection would discourage this because of the delay)... The issue here is not the amount of problematic edits per day, where temporary protection may be warranted, but it is a very persistent long-term issue. Perhaps that permanent pending changes protection would be nice, if permanent semi-protection cannot be applied. Thank you very much, PaleoNeonate ( talk) 02:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
PaleoNeonate, protection is an admin decision (with a few exceptions) and cannot be dictated by local consensus.
NeilN
talk to me
02:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Protection highly appreciated, many thanks. I understand that the administrator who processes the request has the final word, although I believed that showing consensus may be encouraging. Thanks again, PaleoNeonate ( talk) 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: Non-admin restoring his own close against WP:NACD Unscintillating ( talk) 22:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Closed AFD (and re-reminded myself why I don't do admin stuff on my tablet)
NeilN
talk to me
22:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 01:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
01:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Disruptive rotating IP edits. Home Lander ( talk) 01:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I also semi'd a bunch of related articles experiencing the same issues.
Mifter (
talk)
01:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for years. Soerfm ( talk) 20:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Editor was warned and has stopped. Block can be applied if they return
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cyfal ( talk) 23:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. By
Widr.
El_C
00:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's actually "semi-protected,
El_C. Would you upgrade to ECP or fix the message.
George Ho (
talk)
01:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Copy that (misread it). El_C 01:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's actually "semi-protected,
El_C. Would you upgrade to ECP or fix the message.
George Ho (
talk)
01:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued non-constructive small edits by mobile phone editor(s). GoodDay ( talk) 00:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
01:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. Began once again once previous protection was removed, and the article has a lengthy protection history, which I believe warrants an indefinite amount of protection. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk)
01:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Ymblanter has twice recently 'semi-ed' this article. Basically a series of IPs re-instate the same over-detailed material. This IP seems to be behaving problematically across a series of Serbian military articles. Longer term 'semi' please. Pincrete ( talk) 21:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C
00:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of increasing vandalism before Assembly elections. Mélencron ( talk) 22:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of until March 3rd, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
22:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – used twice to bypass create protection at James Demetriou. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Creation protected.
El_C
23:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- 2017
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 March 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content and disruptive editing from multiple IPs. RA0808 talk contribs 21:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NeilN
talk to me
21:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There looks to be legitimate edits being made by anonymous users; I don't want to shut them out of being able to continue to do so. Pending changes protection added.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism as Hopping IP sock of User:Bertrand101. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Buddy_Hield&diff=766449063&oldid=766448871
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Buddy_Hield&diff=766447349&oldid=766447216
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Buddy_Hield&diff=766447929&oldid=766447810
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Buddy_Hield&diff=766448235&oldid=766447929