From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2016

01 October 2016

Indefinite full protection: IPs and newbies have constantly undone this redirect and each time it's not been improved at all, I don't believe temporary protection will help as they'd just come back once it's expired, Thanks,. – Davey2010 Talk 13:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected, I do not see how full protection would be necessary-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Ymblanter - Whoops sorry not sure what happened but that should've been Semi not Full, Thanks for protecting it and thanks for not fully protecting it :) – Davey2010 Talk 18:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 14:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended semi-protection: In September this article was semi-protected for one week due to repetitive unsourced unexplained contentious changes by someone using several IP addresses. The semi-protection has now expired, and the user has resumed disruptive behaviour. Apuldram ( talk) 14:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been subject to repeated vandal-like edits and editwarring!!! . Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 15:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator EdJohnston. 73.96.114.219 ( talk) 18:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs. ELEKHH T 09:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr ( talk) 10:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection. Adm365 13:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: To prevent vandalism and unnecessary editing of unknown or not registered users. Leo kingston ( talk) 13:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting protection as a user is inserting disputed, trivial information sourced to non- WP:RS webpages. The user has been reverted by one other user also, and has been invited to the talk page. Mar4d ( talk) 09:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of content that is properly sourced unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting protection as some users are removing a well established fact, important information collected by renowned sources to non- WP:RS webpages. Users are persistently removing information non-objectively, without any definitive proof or source to further their claim. The editors have been responded to the talk page. Mast3rwayn3 ( talk) 13:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: PGP public key. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 12:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 13:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MPS1992 ( talk) 10:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP addresses keep adding the same two names to the "notable people" section. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's very structural, often, and it's the very same annoying disruptive IP/sock abuser during all these months. Feel free to take a further look at the revision history. Bests - LouisAragon ( talk) 11:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term disruptive editing by varying up addresses adding criticism of the helicopter squadron only supported by a couple of posts to a Yahoo groups. . --  GB  fan 11:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Request protection against recreation - article repeatedly recreated despite consensus to delete at AfD. Citobun ( talk) 04:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09
14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Rapid-fire edit-warring between three editors. Dr. K. 04:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 06:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 ( talk) 02:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued by Dangerous[Enter conjuction here]JXD. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 02:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/KuhnstylePro/Archive. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 03:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – KuhnstylePro should be given the same treatment as the WinXP vandal from 2006; the pages he likes to recreate need to be salted. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 03:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: - Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal - messing up and creating UNSANCTIONED behaviour JG Malmsimp ( talk) 08:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: - Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal - messing up and creating UNSANCTIONED behaviour JG Malmsimp ( talk) 08:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite protection - History of vandalism by unsigned and non-autoconfirmed users. Parsley Man ( talk) 18:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pending changes looks to be working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reasoning as the semiprotection I'm asking for Summer Forever (film) - IP users in 67.44.208.0/22 have been continuously vandalizing it in recent days. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 22:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reasoning as the semiprotection I'm asking for Summer Forever (film) - IP users in 67.44.208.0/22 have been continuously vandalizing it in recent days. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 22:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reasoning as the semiprotection I'm asking for Summer Forever (film) - IP users in 67.44.208.0/22 have been continuously vandalizing it in recent days. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 22:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reasoning as the semiprotection I'm asking for Summer Forever (film) - IP users in 67.44.208.0/22 have been continuously vandalizing it in recent days. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 22:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MPFitz1968 you might want to see about a range block. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP edit warring. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 22:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bishonen . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 01:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recently recreated as Laveen Sinnarajah. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 01:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) What I been doing) 01:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MPS1992 ( talk) 18:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IP editors. Would be helpful if protected for a week. SMS Talk 18:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nirinsanity ( talk) 19:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, indicate IP sock-puppet activity by User:PavelStaykov. Crovata ( talk) 19:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator AlexiusHoratius. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User refuses to seek consensus for an infobox image change. Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Mikemikev appears to be IP hopping. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikemikev for details. Pinging Doug Weller as he's had experience with this user. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semiprotection. An anonymous user is repeatedly attempting to insert claims that, per bureaucrat User:Nihonjoe, are incorrect. And while 66.87.133.246 is knowingly in violation of 3RR, a glance at the edits from other anonymous editors over the last three days gives away that it's one person using at least two (and possibly three) identities. RunnyAmigatalk 21:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

And the warrior is back with a third (or fourth) identity: 66.87.133.17. RunnyAmigatalk 21:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Nihonjoe. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article continues to experience the same kind of vandalism from the same set of IP users (in 67.44.208.0/22) following the last semi-protection of this article, which was for 10 days earlier this month. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 22:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Deleted article repeatedly recreated. SALT for maybe a month or two should do (of course after the article has been deleted, as it has been again recreated). Lourdes 10:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated the past 3 days, childish vandalism each time. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism . Chase ( talk) 18:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A continuing sockpuppet target. Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare18:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator AlexiusHoratius. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 18:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full or semi-protection: Persistent disruption -- IP's and unconfirms making constant disruptive edits. However, the article is plagued with disruption across the spectrum, I believe a stint of full protection might be prudent. LLArrow ( talk) 22:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of changes that are either untrue or disruptive. Xdeluna ( talk) 07:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – adding sites. interrupting and messing with lists of ongoing Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan. Saqib ( talk) 08:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by I.P. 176.126.237.217. Adding a bunch of external links to the beginning of the article. User has been warned by myself and another. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 17:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully the blocks on the two closely-related Romanian IPs that have vandalized the page will take care of it too. Acroterion (talk) 17:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. 176.126.237.208/28 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

02 October 2016

Semiprotection. The article is being targeted by an IP-hopper; the edits this person is trying to make and the accompanying lack of an answer to a very simple question I keep asking won't surprise anybody familiar with the history here. RunnyAmigatalk 23:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The PC seems to be working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A bunch of new SPA accounts, probably socks, treating it like a playground and inserting errors. bonadea contributions talk 08:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to open up the SPI bonadea. œ 08:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: High level of vandalism/sockpuppetry and personal attacks/harassment. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 18:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for watching out. I had declined last week as per here but the abuse has indeed been rampant. I'm hesitant to protect for too long, as it is a talk page. Airplaneman 19:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 11:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  ‑  Iridescent 16:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA troll. Blake Gripling ( talk) 14:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Normally I wouldn't protect for this long given that there have only been a couple of disruptive edits since the last protection expired, but this article is something of an exceptional case. ‑  Iridescent 16:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopping anonymous editor persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Won't discuss. Semi-protection will hopefully get him to the talk page. AussieLegend ( ) 16:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  ‑  Iridescent 16:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Drovethrughosts ( talk) 12:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 13:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Repeated recreation after multiple speedy deletes. WP:SALT, please? Marianna251 TALK 12:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected by Dennis Brown Katie talk 13:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Hi, has there ever been a proper deletion discussion on this? Has it been created with other names before, and which were those? Could you please provide links? Thanks. 92.225.94.224 ( talk) 13:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Discussion is not necessary for a speedy deletion. Poorly or unsourced POV, especially for a WP:BLP article can and should be immediately deleted. freshacconci talk to me 13:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katie talk 14:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive by IP's, constantly adding artists to this list without evidence or without own article. The Banner  talk 13:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 14:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term pending changes/protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and various newly created accounts whose sole puprose seems to be disruptive editng, and adding spam links to YouTube channels. Article has been protected numerous times in the past and accounts have warned and blocked as vandalism only, but the disruptive editing begins again once the the protection expires or via more new accounts and IPs. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 14:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. By different IP/Users.. this has been going on for a while. the last semiprotection got removed I believe, two days ago. Being that this is the biggest show of all time. it deserves protection. The vandalism will keep going on and will happen even more when the new season comes out. I suggest a Indefinite page protection. AffeL ( talk) 14:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes expired on September 30. We may need to semi-protect it for a brief period, but let's keep PC underneath it for a while. Katie talk 14:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 23:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of sock puppetry. Googly Drive ( talk) 00:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 01:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Usually wait for three creations. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – One year after semi-protection, IP editors keep changing information and misinterpret actual expressions of the television series. I don't know whether PC is helpful, but I don't think semi-protection helps anymore in regards to this. This cycle never ends, does it?. George Ho ( talk) 08:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I'm new to the updated 30/500 protection. Maybe semi-protection if 30/500 protection is too much? -- George Ho ( talk) 08:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism / alteration of fleet table totals against the published reference / reliable sources. SempreVolando ( talk) 09:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This article has been protected since December 2008, as the name "Ike" has been retired, there is no reason to move this page to "Hurricane Ike (2008)". I think is the time to unprotect this page. N-C16 ( talk) 09:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Why do not you file a RM?-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Unprotected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Air.light ( talk) 04:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism. -- Dane2007 talk 05:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued addition of private info by anons, though tbh the subject herself disclosed her son's name so I can't blame her. But as per enwiki rules such info is still considered to be confidential. Blake Gripling ( talk) 07:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced anagrams for episode titles. Requested protection before. Alex|The|Whovian ? 00:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three separate anonymous users, all from roughly the same place, have routinely been delinking the name Samara Morgan in the cast list. I do not believe it is unreasonable to keep the name linked, but each and every time it is removed it is without an edit summary and accompanies no other changes. I have politely warned all three IPs, and would only have asked for protection after one more round with relinking the name, but I Geolocated them and they are all from just about the same place in Brazil. I think we have a sockpuppeteer on our hands. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 01:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 daays, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.24 ( talk) 03:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.24 ( talk) 03:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persian/Arabian Gulf edit warring again by IPs. Marek. 69 talk 04:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  ‑  Iridescent 08:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection for two weeks. IP-hopper who is an apparent animal rights activist is edit warring opinion/unsourced content into article and removing sourced content. Jytdog ( talk) 23:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Medium level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 23:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long-term pending changes may also work here too. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 23:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Request creation protection - duplicates existing topic and repeatedly recreated. Citobun ( talk) 18:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A determined IP editor is changing sourced content. I suspect it to be a Diamese sock, but who knows. It could be any number of LTAs that haunt these articles. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 19:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user is changing content while there is an ongoing discussion about the content. -- Gestrid ( talk) 19:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Harassment on talk page. Jdcomix ( talk) 23:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment - altho the IP in question has gotten a well deserved block and talk page access needs to be pulled, Jdcomix needs to realize that his improper actions provoked the incivility. Any editor is allowed to remove almost anything they wish from their own talk page (see WP:OWNTALK) and Jdcomix could just as easily been blocked for WP:3RR. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry about this, I thought that reverting templates off of talk pages wasn't allowed. Won't do it again, sorry! :3 Jdcomix ( talk) 23:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism by IP and new users. Examples in the last 24 hours alone: A, B, C. Also noteworthy is this edit, that quietly reversed the meaning in some sentences. VR talk 23:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 23:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: To prevent edits from IPs. They are unknown and registered users must only edit the article. Leo kingston ( talk) 15:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent harassment of this user by dynamic ip's. I know semi-protection would also lock them out from editing their own talk page, but I couldn't think of any other solution. Sro23 ( talk) 18:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

A block on the IPv6's /64, /48 or /32 range may work here... 73.96.114.219 ( talk) 18:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection Persistent unexplained removal of sourced content. 73.96.114.219 ( talk) 18:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – one month; one IP blocked. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – I want these articles to be only able to be created by admins, because KuhnstylePro socks like to game the system to become autoconfirmed. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 14:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

No, actually I semi-protected it, and here full creation protection is requested.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 21:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined PC seems to be working. Edit rate is low and there are good edits being accepted from unconfirmed users MusikAnimal talk 23:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 21:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined All unconfirmed edits have been rejected, but there's only a handful over the past month. PC seems appropriate MusikAnimal talk 23:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Continue editing the article of the late Japanese voice actress Miyu Matsuki. See contributions: 1 and 2. 148.101.51.212 ( talk) 23:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of unsourced info by proxies. Very aggressive edit summaries indicate this is a single editor. Grayfell ( talk) 23:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Tavix. Airplaneman 04:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Short-term IP recent IP vandalism. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 00:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – by block-evading IP-hopper. Sro23 ( talk) 01:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Amatulic. 73.96.113.24 ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: for two weeks. Recent nationalist IP-hopping edits removing sourced content (some people from New Zealand passionately believe the tree that produces this good honey is only native to New Zealand; it isn't) Jytdog ( talk) 04:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered users. TheBellaTwins1445( talk) 20:43, October 1, 2016 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions by unregistered and registered users. TheBellaTwins1445( talk) 23:11, October 1, 2016 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.219 ( talk) 18:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite creation protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 ( talk) 19:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 23:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 22:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Drmies. 73.96.114.206 ( talk) 23:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

03 October 2016

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 11:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Southern Poverty Law Center (Result = IP blocked)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 15:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Also National Policy Institute, same IP, same thing. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 15:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Volunteer Marek is currently engaged in an edit war and has no NPOV, I would suggest you take this with a pinch of salt. 213.205.198.74 ( talk) 15:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Be advised that IP has been reverted by multiple users. --Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites15:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Are you trying to suggest that because 3 of you fail to have a NPOV that that becomes consensus? 213.205.198.74 ( talk) 15:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
See WP:BRD. clpo13( talk) 15:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
So why was there no discussion provided by the people reverting, if they're following the (optional) policy? 213.205.198.74 ( talk) 15:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
You want to make the change, so you have to justify it. Edit summaries are not a substitute for talk page discussion (see WP:REVTALK). clpo13( talk) 15:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
So every single edit needs to be justified on the talk page for each relevant article? I'll think you'll find it's the one's engaged in a revert war that should be justifying their uncommented reversions. 213.205.198.74 ( talk) 15:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
If an edit is challenged (by reversion), then yes, it needs to be justified and editors should come to consensus before editing further. clpo13( talk) 15:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Doug Weller talk 16:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. IP hopping by long-term puppet master User:Fangusu. Antique RoseDrop me a line 15:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 ( talk) 23:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. -- Euryalus ( talk) 02:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oh all right. There's not that much disruption here, and I would have preferred the request to come from the page owner; but have semi-protected for a couple of weeks anyway in the hope that the vandal gets bored. -- Euryalus ( talk) 09:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: sockpuppetry – Further sockpuppetry might occur some days later. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 03:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by requestor. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 03:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Keri ( talk) 18:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry ( WP:Block evasion) from User:Parkchiqmu who continue to attack article by using IPs range from 115 as per similar reason for the protection of Malaysia national under-23 football team. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 19:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This template might be frequently used and substituted. George Ho ( talk) 20:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No history of vandalism and not a high-risk template as defined in the protection policy. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous changing of sourced content by a plenthora of sock accounts, IP socks, and what-not, even after the article got semi-protected once again recently. - . LouisAragon ( talk) 00:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined The only questionable edit after semi appeared to be an attempt to fix a redlink introduced by vandals. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – various IPs inserting nonsensical content. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 01:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 02:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Event has ended and activity has died down. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated changes to "power and Authority of Correction Officers". The section is well sourced. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 12:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be targeted by multiple new accounts for vandalism. -- Dane2007 talk 03:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Appears to have calmed down. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new users have targeted recently for vandalism/blanking. -- Dane2007 talk 03:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. @ Dane2007: With just two users over the past couple days doing this, I don't think we're quite to the point where we need semi, especially since this is an active show where new editors likely will want to contribute positively. Ping me or drop me a talk page message if the same vandal pops up again and I'll apply semi. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page is undergoing a high volume of edits by IPs adding WP:OR, and listing countries which are not on the list. Mar4d ( talk) 11:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 11:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: 2,000+ transclusions. George Ho ( talk) 20:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ Rob13 Talk 08:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 73.96.115.67 ( talk) 03:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Someone continues to change the operators to add uncited and false information. Thanks for considering. RickyCourtney ( talk) 03:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Whenever anyone makes a constructive edit on this article, it always ends up reverted by new users, and there are users who continue to vandalize and add false information to this article. -- Superchunk22 ( talk) 05:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protection: Move warring, Page was created at B.A.M. and has been moved back and forth from the incorrect B. A. M. several times. Acronyms are generally not spaced in article titles and I can find no source spacing the acronym for the artist. Ss 112 08:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This series has just released and there has been some disruptive editing from IPs. Would be helpful to have protection for a short time period. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 20:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 06:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nine incidents of ongoing, persistent vandalism since August 17, and another 9 or 10 from June to August, average 1 or 2 a week. — btphelps ( talk to me) ( what I've done) 07:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. disruption is not too frequent, so there is no reason to limit folks' ability to edit: but new editors' edits now subject to review. Vanamonde ( talk) 08:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Apparently there is a dispute going on between two registered editors that is being discussed on the talk page. It would be preferable to have an admin intervene by judging what the outcome of this article should be - what should go on it and what shouldn't - along with Tibetan language. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 19:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Spartacus! t@lk 05:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus ( talk) 05:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by multiple IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

requesting pending changes protection due to recent dispute against recent IP edits

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Yankees10 00:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what's going on, but an IP editor has seemingly posted a vandal-ish statement on my talk page a few times in the previous few hours. To prevent this for a bit, can my talk page be semi-ed for 6–12 hours?. (Whoever this vandal is seems to hop IPs per my talk page's edit history, so semi may be preferred over blocking the IP.) Steel1943 ( talk) 02:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 02:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I see too many reverts, including of mistakes and wrong assumptions. George Ho ( talk) 21:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 02:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Pending changes protection added in July for one month in response to frequent poor edits (unsourced, poorly written, etc.) from unregistered users. This did not stop the poor edits from happening, so temporary semi-protection was put in place. This solved the problem, but the article's semi-protection expired a few days ago, and...surprise, surprise...the poor edits from unregistered users have resumed (~30 such edits have been reverted within the past two days). The best solution for this never-ending issue is to reinstate semi-protection for the article and to make it indefinite. Jackdude101 ( Talk) 23:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackdude101, I appreciate this is a long-term issue, we can always escalate to indefinite if it persists next year. Euryalus ( talk) 00:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus ( talk) 02:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopping anonymous editor persistently adding the same unsourced content over and over again. Started in December 2015, and every time the protection expires, a couple of days later, the editor is back, using a new IP address. PJEckenheim ( talk) 17:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Already has PC1, but I blocked the /64 (the POV editor) for three months. Reviewers, please, please be careful when accepting IP edits. This last one shouldn't have slipped through. Katie talk 20:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: High level of dynamic IP vandalism. It was recently semi-protected for 2 weeks. Nika de Hitch ( talk) 19:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, outrageous BLP violations. MB298 ( talk) 22:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Has not previously been protected; I would prefer to use short-term protection first. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: This page might need to be salted. Mlpearc ( open channel) 22:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

04 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs repeatedly changing a character's actor from Garth Jennings to Leslie Jones, contradicting the cited source. McGeddon ( talk) 11:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Over 3000 transclusions. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Katie talk 20:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant changing proper formatting and coherent wording to awkward fragmentations. TropicAces ( talk) 20:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)tropicAces reply

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Regularly getting overwritten by new editors who haven't read the instructions. John of Reading ( talk) 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk ( talk) 14:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Recently created and speedied vandalism page. The article could really be created as a vandalism page. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism from anons and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Entranced98 ( talk) 15:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Mike1901 ( talk) 16:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Widr. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Widr. Katie talk 20:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, defamatory content. May need to rev/delete some edits. 2601:188:1:AEA0:5026:9BD2:9F02:C2DF ( talk) 19:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Widr. Katie talk 20:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13( talk) 19:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I'm just posting valid sources and if there's something wrong with that I agree with page protection. However, that's being very disruptive and unfair to other editors. 89.164.242.200 ( talk) 19:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from IPs 99.248.221.109, 2607:FEA8:C2DF:FAEA:3515:5029:C842:3286 and 99.246.124.48. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D ( talk) 06:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 11:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2601:188:1:AEA0:5026:9BD2:9F02:C2DF ( talk) 18:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Template is viewed perhaps 30 times/day, so the original rationale is not sufficient. Its tranclusions are probably also not viewed especially often, compared to other navboxes. Izno ( talk) 11:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hoary? Katie talk 11:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
A reasonable request. I've unprotected it. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Hoary: I still see it as semi-protected. Katie talk 11:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry. Is it OK now? -- Hoary ( talk) 13:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Done (for the bot) tutterMouse ( talk) 15:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Keri ( talk) 18:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined There is a lot of editing but there does not seem to be a lot of back and forth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
That "lot of editing" is vandalism, but your call. Keri ( talk) 08:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ CambridgeBayWeather: There's a single shifting IP repeatedly adding variations on the same stream-of-consciousness nonsense about how a 1990s kids movie sequel was cancelled for containing a lot of horrific zombie monsters from 2010s videogames. Most recent edits are an IP adding this and other editors deleting it again. -- McGeddon ( talk) 11:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: High level of Sock puppetry, Vandalism, addition of Unsourced Material, removal of additional content. ZeEnergizer ( talk) 07:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined There is a lot of activity and it's difficult to determine what is disruptive and what isn't, so I have to AGF and assume problems will be self-correcting. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended semi Socks socking. Main page was semid for six months, but apparently not the talk. TimothyJosephWood 12:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected. Favonian ( talk) 12:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated puerile, BLP-violating vandalism, probably by the same person using a series of throw-away sockpuppets. — Odysseus 147 9 02:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing my numerous IP users claiming that "Uchuu Sentai Kyuranger" is the next title, which has not been confirmed by Toei. Areaseven ( talk) 03:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive, promotional editing from IPs and sock accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itsmukeshhere). Deli nk ( talk) 10:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Preemptive protection; the individual is a starting quarterback for a team who in 15 minutes will be on Monday Night Football. The article WILL be subject to high vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 00:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Troll. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Would recommend a short-term protection, 12 hours or so should do (for now...). 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 01:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Jayron32. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 01:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Not done For the Bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 01:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:C0B4:5EA9:E6BD:178B ( talk) 01:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Per the last 2 AfDs, non-redirect content should not be restored without asking an administrator. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 13:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued and persistent trolling from an IP-hopping vandal. Blake Gripling ( talk) 06:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent IP edit warring about the name of one character in the film. The fandom desperately wants Brenton Thwaites' character "Henry" to be the son of Orlando Bloom's character Will Turner but there is not a single official confirmation about Henry's full name being "Henry Turner" or him being in any way related to Will Turner.-- Max Tomos ( talk) 06:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuously being harassed by KIngshowman's sock. Thanks to Sro23 for continuously fighting them. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 04:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by IPs related to the LTA case Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 04:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent IP edit warring began as soon as the previous semi-protection ended. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 05:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet ( talk) 05:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 00:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandalism only page recreated twice in last ten minutes. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.22 ( talk) 04:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Revert-warring by IP-hopping user. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – New and IP users removing negative information from the article. Pending Changes to ensure these get filtered out to ensure WP:NPOV is maintained. -- Dane2007 talk 18:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Being "clumsiliy undone" by other IP's. Possibly concerted. - DVdm ( talk) 20:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption – An IP hopping editor persists in altering the color scheme of the table and introducing WP:ACCESSIBILITY concerns. Motion picture rating system, Video game rating system and Television content rating systems are already semi-protected because of this but the disruption has spread to this article now. Betty Logan ( talk) 20:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Sports Official with recent vandalism. Eteethan (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GAB gab 21:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long-term disruption. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 23:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of DOB BLP information by edit-warring IPs. Endemic to all K-pop articles. Dr. K. 13:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser ( talk) 14:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Escalating Semi: Immediate resumption of vandalism following expiration of previous semi. TimothyJosephWood 14:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Different IPs adding casts and characters that are not confirmed. jmarkfrancia ( talk) 14:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Keri ( talk) 14:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Same editor, back at it again immedietly after the previous protection period expired. 73.96.113.22 ( talk) 02:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) User(s) blocked. - 107.77.232.0/22 blocked for 1 week by administrator Oshwah. 73.96.113.22 ( talk) 03:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Oshwah. 73.96.113.22 ( talk) 03:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism this morning from multiple IPs, some of it with BLP issues. Strongjam ( talk) 13:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. IP hopping by long-term puppet master User:Fangusu. Antique RoseDrop me a line 15:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Ronhjones. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 00:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content by IPs and new accounts, at least one of whom claims to be Brian Welsh. Marianna251 TALK 15:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator GB fan. 73.96.112.154 ( talk) 00:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 15:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Katie talk 19:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – No deleting allowed. Dirty Duck 16:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined Katie talk 19:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs and redlink editors. John from Idegon ( talk) 17:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not going to indefinitely protect a page that's never been protected before. Katie talk 19:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Clicked the wrong button. That's all I wanted. Thanks Katie. John from Idegon ( talk) 20:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

05 October 2016

Semi-protection: On 10/4/2016 there was an editor who tried multiple times to add promotional material editor was blocked, today an IP started trying to add the same information into the article. VViking Talk Edits 13:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring nationalist POV. Just plain Bill ( talk) 14:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 14:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: second day in a row of a vandalism spree on this page from IPs and new accounts. Hairhorn ( talk) 16:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: After Jason Todd was protected because an IP-hopper was edit warring with disruptive edits made to the userbox, the user started doing the exact same thing at Deathstroke. And after the user was reverted again by multiple editors, this suspiciously brand new account picked up where the disruptive editor left off. In short, persistent disruptive editing. Dark Knight 2149 03:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Apparently new IP editor continually adds unsourced observations re: topic and images, and seems to ignore or not see explanatory edit summaries and talk page comments. I'm hoping temporary protection will get the message across. — TAnthony Talk 04:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 15:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done; Fully protected by Nthep for one month. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 19:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Usercheck-full is on a massive amount of user and other pages, usercheck short is template protected and usercheck is semi-protected. . Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued violation of BLP policies following recent stint of page being blocked; editing is highly disruptive. livelikemusic talk! 03:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 18:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Registered SPA user and sock hopping IPs repeatedly adding the same unsourced, promotional material to the article. - Mr X 13:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – various IPs inserting nonsensical content. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 14:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 16:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A large amount of IP disruptive edits after the protection expired. Nickag989 talk 17:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req 30 day semi. Persistent introduction of changes that are fantastically contrary to MOS:TV by multiple IP hoppers. Attempts to discuss have been ignored. This is part of a grander problem across a variety of Indian TV shows produced by Colors TV. The only reason why I'm not semi-ing it myself is because I took the initiative to try to open discussion on the matter so I'm worried that I might be considered involved. I think that's a bit silly, but if you want to drop me a note and weigh in with your thoughts, I'm interested in hearing them. I don't watch Indian entertainment, so I don't have an emotional attachment to the subject matter. Thx. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: For the last few weeks, IPs and non-confirmed users have been adding large sections of WP:OR, resulting in persistent edit wars. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] Ilovetopaint ( talk) 13:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done, semi-protected the second one for two weeks. For the first one, I currently do not see enough activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is presently undergoing frequent changes by IP editors, who are introducing WP:POV in the text. Mar4d ( talk) 17:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 17:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Target of banned User:Bigshowandkane64. Sro23 ( talk) 04:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The article is undergoing edit warring over a content dispute + edits by blocked sockpuppets. Mar4d ( talk) 05:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done 1 month by FPAS. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated changes of a single area of information (height/weight) that is properly sourced with unsourced/unverified information, by various IPs. Brad E. Williams ( talk) 12:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 12:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs ignoring discussion. SummerPhD v2.0 13:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 17:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Full protection: Return of problematic editors. Check talk page protection initiated under false claims and continuous tag-teaming that isn't directed towards strengthening the article. Current issue is simple removal of cited small sentence with non-related tags. Check: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Social_work&diff=742616940&oldid=742603908 59.96.160.121 ( talk) 08:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The requester is the problematic IP-hopper who geolocates to Kerala, India. Please see Talk:Social work#IP-hopper Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 19:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
As always twisting the facts, disregarding policies, tag-teaming, online bullying and racism - these were already proved from related ANI discussions, pertaining to the article. Other discussions also prove there intent to be malicious and partially due to ignorance about the subject. Check Talk:Social work#IP-hopper and the history of revisions and the process, it is good time-pass to see how wikipedia still could be used for personal objectives. I wish and hope this sort of manipulative behavior would be handled according to wikipedia procedures and not turn a blind eye. This will only bring followers and clouts. Today too with the raising vandalism I checked a previously involved problematic editor's page and was devastating to see how much the person has changed from a coolheaded diplomatic to a rampant one. But their contributions cant be neglected, that too is there. But I feel that shouldn't license them to ignore all best practices and showcase WP:DICKERY. I would say a 3 months full protection with reversions of Jim1138 and any possible actions from other previously negatively involved editors actions is a good decision, reviewing the history.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., there is a lot of disruptive IP edits, including the filer.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Wow, disruptive ip edits. So removal of continuous cited material by registered disruptors are not identified. That was a beautiful statement. Maybe this is what ignore all rules truly means, its a learning moment. I am not sure how far the bullying and anti-wiki spirit exists, but this proves it exists nonetheless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.196.228.85 ( talk) 07:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Just stop socking first and take it to the talk page next, in a constructive manner.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Socking is when done with malicious purpose, if you see this - do what should be done. Here you can identify in this request, its just one person asking why their cited material was removed and accused, do talk in my ip talk-page - if time allows. Thank you.

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism from redlink editors. Not sure if a stronger block is in order or protection. Leaving it in your more capable hands. John from Idegon ( talk) 04:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Widr ( talk) 06:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and a autoconfirmed Jim1138 ( talk) 07:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 08:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and frequent vandalism by throwaway accounts. . Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 06:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of silliness from 2 IPs and a new account. Pam D 15:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 23:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Previously semi-protected for two weeks by NeilN. [5] I request a month this time. Persistent and abusive dynamic IP reverting to out-of-date image for no apparent reason. See page history for edit summaries such as: (Fuck you Jonteemil), (Fuck off Alsee), and admission of block evasion: (I am a different IP and NOT blocked HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA). Alsee ( talk) 00:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked. Message me on my talk page if it continues Alsee and I'll see whether I need to block another smaller range or protect the page. The block I made covered nearly all IPs the vandal has used on that page, and the remaining few could easily be blocked with another smaller range block if they become active again. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of sourced content by multiple IPs. Jim1138 ( talk) 00:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Not only is the content not sourced, but it's plainly non-neutral. I've removed it again and started a talk page discussion. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13( talk) 21:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Karst ( talk) 22:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by various IP addresses. Carbrera ( talk) 23:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 16:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 20:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 01:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Major contested changes to lead without discussion or consensus. Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. N-C16 ( talk) 13:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Not much disruption, really. Let's keep it unlocked for a while. Katie talk 20:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, KrakatoaKatie, didn't notice this request until after I had already protected based on my watchlist. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 23:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. N-C16 ( talk) 13:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 23:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated removal of controversy section, and addition of unsourced, disruptive edits too. DRAGON BOOSTER 18:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 20:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi: Resumption of vandalism following expiration of previous semi. TimothyJosephWood 21:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 40 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 23:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Green C 21:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 21:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism since 9/30. One IP blocked....have moved on to an entirely different range. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

06 October 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Abuse by User:Dharmendra bansal, disruptively interfering with the feedback process. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 09:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. ~ Manila's Poging Juan 12:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ PogingJuan: I don't think the ECP you requested here is necessary; most if not all disruption can be blocked with semi protection. Airplaneman 20:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained removal of mass sourced content from username Magalingako and vandalism from IP 101.175.189.249. Who knows, there could be more. Matieszyn talk 13:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. Minima © ( talk) 13:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 days should do it. — cyberpower Chat:Online 14:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr ( talk) 16:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: At least two registered editors have reverted non-constructive, including non-MOS and cite-removing, edits by IP-hopping anon IP(s). They seem to be duplicating edits of a reverted editor who is being investigated at an SPI. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or PC. Mlpearc ( open channel) 17:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 20:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A few days protection would help. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract17:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection for 1 month, constant vandalism in September and is still continuing. — JudeccaXIII ( talk) 20:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shifting IP adding "associated acts" of unclear significance. (Identified as Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal at User talk:2607:FB90:2440:EB20:B826:B8EC:C9D6:AE4.). McGeddon ( talk) 20:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – New users and IP's keep adding an unsourced "nickname" that reads like a tagline. Consensus has not been made at the talk page under the section for these additions. -- Dane2007 talk 00:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm am tempted to restore it back to previous protection that was set to expire in May 2017. Ever since that was lifted we've seen nothing but disruption, and the protection log suggests this is an ongoing problem MusikAnimal talk 19:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ MusikAnimal: I don't think that would be a bad idea, the history definitely supports it for sure. Thank you for protecting it! -- Dane2007 talk 19:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking user has been a frequent visitor to this page for most of this year. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 11:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a starting point MusikAnimal talk 19:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Continually moving page against guidelines and consensus. BilCat ( talk) 17:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protected by DrKay —  Andy W. ( talk ·ctb) 18:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Continually moving page against guidelines and consensus. BilCat ( talk) 17:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protected by DrKay —  Andy W. ( talk ·ctb) 18:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis ( talk) 09:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Recurring IP edit-warring. Mezigue ( talk) 13:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: (For move protection only) No further reason to move this page. . N-C16 ( talk) 09:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ JamesBWatson:-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I am not sure why I was pinged. The current edit protection was applied by BU Rob13. The move protection dates from 5 February 2011, applied by Mattinbgn, when the article was titled "Severe Tropical Cyclone Yasi", before being moved to its present title. The protection was moved to the present title when the article was moved, on 24 February 2011, more than three years since I had anything to do with the article. My only involvement was applying semi-protection in 2014, but it expired in May 2015, and I have had no part in any protection, editing, or anything else to do with the article since then. (Incidentally, I am also not at all sure what is being asked for. Does "Unprotection: (For move protection only)" mean that only move protection should be lifted? Or does it mean that editing protection should be lifted, so that only move protection stays in place? Either way, I don't understand why "No further reason to move this page" would be a reason for the change.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 08:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I believe this request is for lifting only the move protection, but just in case, I'll note that the semi-protection is the result of a prolific sockpuppeteer targeting this page and I would oppose lifting it early. Please ping me again if the semi-protection winds up under discussion here and I can elaborate further. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined on the basis of this discussion. If specifically the move protection needs to be removed, please ping me, I can remove it.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Template is victim of the Puntland–Somaliland dispute. The Banner  talk 10:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Or long-term pending changes protection. Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.178 ( talk) 02:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It's becoming tough for editors to revert frequent vandalism and unsourced edits. Request a longer protection for this controversial film. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 06:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is facing persistent efforts by unregistered or newly registered users vandalising or pushing POV of some kind or other, degenerating into edit wars. See for example this talk page section. It would help to have more neutral eyes in the review of the edits. Kautilya3 ( talk) 07:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – My personal wikipedia page has been vandalised on several occasions. Links and information have been removed, but more importantly, harmful, degrading and false accusations were posted regarding to sexual abuse cases and my academic background. A few persistent users would remove any update regarding to these sections. Michaelmeegan ( talk) 10:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The Brazilian association football won a competition in 1987 when there was no official league. There are varying opinions (see the talk page) about the issue. Anons change the article daily to either add or remove that the time has won the trophy for that year. Please lock article to new and anon editors. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. agtx 04:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ymblanter ( talk) 19:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full-protection: Some vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyatt2049 ( talkcontribs) 12:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated WP:NOTBROKEN vios and socking. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 14:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Not quite frequent or harmful enough to warrant semi-protection, and the edits won't look suspicious to reviewers unfamiliar with the situation, so pending changes wouldn't be helpful. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of parts of the article by varying IPs, making it say the opposite of what it is meant to say. 331dot ( talk) 11:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The IP is still actively edit-warring on this article, and has moved on to frivolous disruption. Just plain Bill ( talk) 21:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP-users are persistently adding the nominees for the next Oscars. Crboyer ( talk) 15:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Recreation of a nn deleted page. Mar11 ( talk) 16:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandal trying to replace page about a certain ethnicity's cinema with one about Sanskrit cinema. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 22:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: An unfortunate target for immature IP vandalism on a semi-regular basis. Sometimes goes un-noticed, often goes without being entirely reverted. Semi-protection might help, but I will leave to consensus. AtomCrusher ( talk) 23:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a person who insists on deleting content on here. Pyrusca ( talk) 23:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 01:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Edits were factually accurate, and I've restored the information with an appropriate reference. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal resumed immediately after last one ended. — Chevvin 02:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection ended. Vandalism started. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. — Chevvin 02:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

See Hannah (name) below for more info — Chevvin 02:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent very promotional editing and reverting probably by a sockpuppet of a blocked coi. Atlantic306 ( talk) 03:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. not going to jump to indef, when the IP could be blocked if it persists after unprotection. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He lost the big game, so here come the IP vandals. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 03:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He won the big game, so here comes the IP vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 03:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 16:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 16:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ymblanter ( talk) 18:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi: Either several IPs, or what seems more likely, a single IP hopper repeatedly removing sourced content. Gave a 3RR warning to one of them, but a ANEW report is not feasible given the circumstances. TimothyJosephWood 21:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. gobonobo + c 01:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we'll see what tomorrow brings. The Interior (Talk) 02:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Ongoing issues with the IT staff of this school by User:Purbrook User talk:Purbrook. VViking Talk Edits 13:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Appreciate the report, but semiprotection won't help here when there has only one (now indefinitely blocked) account that is causing trouble. If sockpuppets or IPs apear, then semiprotection can be of help. Airplaneman 21:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for about two months now, likely a bunch of schools. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Or Long-term pending changes protection. Persistent vandalism. 73.96.115.95 ( talk) 00:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Or long-term pending changes protection. Persistent vandalism. 73.96.115.95 ( talk) 00:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced information . Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 13:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, this was just one IP, and they seem to have stopped after your warning.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PPAP is a now-viral music video and some people are looking for its article on WP. It is a shame for WP to show people misinformation made by vandalizers, especially IP users. ~ Manila's Poging Juan 12:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's a relatively but—in my opinion, not overwhelmingly—high level of non-autoconfirmed editing going on, but quite a bit of those edits have constructive. Let's try PC; if anyone disagrees and believes semi protection would better serve this article, just let me know and I'll change it. Airplaneman 21:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – this page was outdated. due to this being a military squadrons page I've been instructed by my commander to redirect the old page into the new page. a user has decided to undo the redirect and reverse it to the outdated page. this page should go to (#REDIRECT 436 Operations Support Squadron) thanks . ...---... ( talk) 17:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, please follow dispute resolution avenues.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

07 October 2016

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has only one problem: addition of a crew member (producer) without a source. It has been reverted tens of times, and now I think it's time we find a better solution to this. Nairspecht ( talk) 07:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:33, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 09:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated page blanking. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors continue re-inserting pop culture that there isn't any consensus to have in this article. Page has been protected multiple times in the last year. Every time the PP comes off, the IPs return. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Manila's Poging Juan 18:49, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: for say two weeks. Persistent vandalism over the last few days. Jytdog ( talk) 19:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. VietPride10 ( talk) 23:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John of Reading ( talk) 10:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes isn't enough (see page history) since reviewing the repeated IP-vandalism wastes too much time for other editors. - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 18:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Is my userpage and needs to be semi-protected. Israfil Foraez TC 18:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, no such user-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration protection on Arab-Iserali conflicts should be applied to this article as well. Persistent vandalism. Ueutyi ( talk) 00:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter ( talk) 07:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was semi-protected for a week and literally within four minutes of having the restrictions lifted, sock puppets once again resumed edit-warring. DARTHBOTTO  talkcont 01:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately, no, Cyberbot I. The template is still there, but about two hours ago, the semi-protection expired. What we need is to extend it indefinitely. DARTHBOTTO  talkcont 02:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ DarthBotto: As of my note here, the page will be semi protected for four more hours. Looks like the account adding the information is autoconfirmed. Airplaneman 02:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Airplaneman: I found that out a few minutes after I requested this. I'd like to keep this request up, however, as it will slow KurdoKardir's sockpuppet efforts, even if he does get some of his accounts autoconfirmed. DARTHBOTTO  talkcont 03:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Airplaneman 18:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The nature of this article has caused many acts of vandalism over the past few months. Evking22 ( talk) 15:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism, high profile subject. Lizard ( talk) 21:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Has a documentation. GXXF TC 21:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc ( open channel) 23:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SJ Morg ( talk) 05:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon users keep turning an attendance of 54,900 (which was confirmed by the Indian Super League) to 64,900 (a number supposedly said on TV). The official match report again has 54,900. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 18:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Good long semi Page has had pending for two years now, and by the looks of it, it has just wasted a lot of people's time. Persistent vandalism going back as far as you care to look. TimothyJosephWood 19:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

As a long-time page watcher, I would very much appreciate this being put under indefinite semi-protection. It's not just vandalism: there's BLP issues and occasional whiffs of socking thrown in—and no reason to suspect it will abate. Rebb ing 19:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
It would be kindof nice if we had a bot that would watch pages with pending and automatically report here if a certain proportion of edits were reversions of pending changes. TimothyJosephWood 19:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
It would be even more useful if it would comment with crude estimates of problematic editing: "Significant uptick in reverts starting two weeks ago, boss" versus "Average of 13 ± 5 vandalism-coded reverts per month going back to 1998, boss." Rebb ing 20:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if vandalism resumes after one year, pleae bring it back here for indefinite semi.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extensively edited by anons, along with Special:Contributions/94.60.196.117 who is currently blocked for promoting neo-Nazi publications. Article is not neutral and it would help to have the protection to limit editing by anons. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. While vandalism has occurred, the IP in question has been blocked, and disruption is quite infrequent. Due to the nature of the disruptive material, I have PC protected this, but I don't see pre-emptive semi-protection being justified here: anon-editing is not, in and of itself, a problem. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by multiple IP 204.100.156.X A IP block on this range would do the trick. Mtpaley ( talk) 20:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly created. Every new attempt to create this article has been unconstructive. 73.96.114.237 ( talk) 01:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 07:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Article creator has undeclared COI, as evidenced by the slew of similar articles for Lagos musical articles each with professional photos with a claim of self-authorship. Article has been deleted in the past through AfD but original creator seems poised to recreate it (editing in userspace). Citobun ( talk) 14:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant IP POV pushing. Mlpearc ( open channel) 16:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman 02:50, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two classmates collaborating to censor well-cited information they find distasteful, refusing requests to open a discussion. Toddst1 ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 06:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to attract a lot of silly vandalism - possibly it's on a school syllabus?. Pam D 21:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheWarOfArt ( talk) 02:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Was already PC protected for another week, which I have extended to 3 months. I don't think disruption is frequent enough to justify semi-protection over and above that. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA User:Fangusu has apparently taken an interest. Grayfell ( talk) 04:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection - High level of IP vandalism. Pratyush ( talk) 06:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over a dozen vandalizing edits from different IPs in the last couple of days. Burninthruthesky ( talk) 06:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Azealia911 talk 16:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator 78.26. Airplaneman 02:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant adding and reverting to overlong reviews which are often aimless, wrongly sourced and irrelevant. Don't want to start an edit war. TropicAces ( talk) 16:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)tropicAces reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc ( open channel) 17:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 02:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Seriously, there are users constantly vandalizing this article. Whenever I come on this article, there's always someone vandalizing it. I think that it would really help if it were protected for a long, LONG time. -- Superchunk22 ( talk) 17:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPv6 user(s) with varying addresses since October 5. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 01:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article receives regular IP vandalism. Six-months of PC1 would keep the schoolkids away. Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Almost all edits from new users are vandalism. I think PC would just be a waste of time. Airplaneman 02:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and repeated vandalism by several IP users. Donner60 ( talk) 01:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator 78.26. Airplaneman 02:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs vandalizing with the 2nd saying it has changed its IP. Tom (North Shoreman) ( talk) 02:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism continues. 11.5 hours after the 3 day protection was lifted... another disruptive edit was made. -- RickyCourtney ( talk) 02:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The title was proposed but then moved minutes or hours later. Then it was reverted very soon. Then I stepped in and re-proposed to alleviate the mess at the talk page. Now I am requesting protection based on this. George Ho ( talk) 03:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Should hold off to see if it kicks back up again, if and when the discussion gets more participation. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 04:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Agreed. Only one back and forth revert MusikAnimal talk 19:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Defacement of content. Request 1 month page protection.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 19:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Same issue and same block-evading anon IPs as noted as Jerry Siegel, above. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 19:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

08 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, of a Trumpian nature. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Amatulic for 3 weeks. tutterMouse ( talk) 11:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hollyckuhno ( talk) 11:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 11:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Infobox vandal Mikequfv returns. . Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 11:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Infobox vandal Mikequfv returns. . Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 11:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – en-US being confused with en-GB by IPs. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:56, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of talkpage while blocked. 73.96.113.42 ( talk) 04:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Airplaneman 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jacce ( talk) 06:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism by sockpuppets of Mikequfv. Page was off one month semi for less than four hours before vandal returned. . Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 11:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated target of a sockpuppeteer who has been relentlessly adding WP:ROUTINE content on pages relating to events that took place in the Philippines. Any such pages like 19xx or 20xx in the Philippines are commonly targeted by the sockmaster himself through his alt accounts. Blake Gripling ( talk) 11:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 ( talk) 00:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 00:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

 Comment: Semi-protected indefinitely. by administrator Euryalus. 73.96.113.42 ( talk) 04:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Minor point: it was semi-protected by Materialscientist; I just move-protected it as well. -- Euryalus ( talk) 04:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Ah, alright then. :-) 73.96.113.42 ( talk) 04:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
It's mindless pedantry like my minor point above that makes the janitorial work worthwhile. -- Euryalus ( talk) 04:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and new editor vandalism today adding BLP problems. VViking Talk Edits 00:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

 Comment: Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Deor. 73.96.113.42 ( talk) 04:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has repeatedly been protected due to some IPs socking and changing everything from British English to American English, As it's been protected 6 times already I think Indef is the next best option as it's obvious this IP isn't going to stop, Thanks. – Davey2010 Talk 03:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resilient IP user who frequents pages of recently released films and adds own POV. Nairspecht ( talk) 13:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This appears to be a problem with a single user. It's true that they're adding unsourced synthesis; I've given them an additional warning. If further disruption occurs and they refuse to engage in discussion, please report the user. Airplaneman 23:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS 77 15:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 23:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - IP's are repeatedly deleting a contentious paragraph. -- Clorox ( talk) 21:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 23:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Too much IP incorrect edits and reverts. 46.130.134.33 ( talk) 12:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 20:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of promotion/advertising (inserting phone numbers) by anonymous IPs from India. Consider similar protection for other HP related articles, such as HP Inc. ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 13:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Delt with by other means. Please let me know if you see similar disruption getting through MusikAnimal talk 20:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Some Gadget Geek: Ping to make sure you see this. Thanks MusikAnimal talk 20:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – this page is being edited by IP addresses who adding unsourced and promotional content . Saqib ( talk) 16:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two IP editors since June protection expired. Katie talk 23:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I've undone my PC protection. My rationale: 1) I considered this, being a BLP, on a more strict scale than I would an average article. 2) Problematic material (e.g. unsourced or promotional) has escaped notice for long periods of time in the past. That being said, I understand that this can be seen as a fringe case. Airplaneman 23:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Airplaneman 04:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since April 2016, there have been ~24 instances of IPs inserting a derogatory word into this BLP. . Logical Fuzz ( talk) 12:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Airplaneman 23:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC): reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The edits are relatively infrequent but chronic and clear violations of BLP policy. I see little to no evidence of helpful contributions from new users/IPs. Airplaneman 23:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Controversial CEO, vandalised every few days . Joseph 2302 13:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP removes referenced information. Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:50, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of out-of-date title in the face of newer sources. Alex|The|Whovian ? 04:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Different IPs adding contents and does not follow format. Can I request for 3 or 6 months? Leo kingston ( talk) 10:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Persistent vandalism – Page repeatedly created by WP:SPA who wants to have an article about himself ( User:Hisham Abdel Khalek). Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Ronhjones. Airplaneman 23:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users. . CycloneYoris ( talk) 20:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past week. Lizard ( talk) 21:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's football season! Airplaneman 23:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Seeking full protection to stop repeated addition of copyrighted images from same editor. Editor has socked and has shown zero attempt to communicate. Full protection should force them to communicate. The other option is to block the user and then deal with the sockpuppets they have already shown to use socks. Ravensfire ( talk) 01:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.; if socks appear report then at SPI or ask here to semi-protect the page.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Ymblanter: thanks, and will do. Ravensfire ( talk) 18:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated "whitewashing", by removing the "Freedom fighters" section, by several different IPs. - Arjayay ( talk) 10:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP/SPA vandalism. Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 12:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing resumed shortly after previous protection expired. Grayfell ( talk) 20:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

09 October 2016

Move protection: Until consensus forms to move on talkpage. Renaming dispute. Currently being moved to little known Vietnamese name as opposed to well-known stage/pseud name that appears in majority of sources. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 18:58, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protected. Simply protecting on the title I found it on. Courcelles ( talk) 20:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected. Courcelles ( talk) 21:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected. Courcelles ( talk) 21:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 04:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) 04:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Courcelles ( talk) 20:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 04:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC) 04:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Courcelles ( talk) 20:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All IP edits not been good after all . KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 13:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles ( talk) 20:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 . nableezy - 06:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC) 06:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content dispute, promotional edits by IPs. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Nick for two weeks. tutterMouse ( talk) 14:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burn vandalism/addition of spam link from IPs. There does not seem to be any recent constructive contributions from anonymous users and this is a low edit traffic page. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected. by another admin. Courcelles ( talk) 20:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 19:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected. Courcelles ( talk) 20:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term persistent vandalism from IPs. I ran diffs all the way back to November 2015, and there's not been any convincingly constructive edits. I suggest a fairly long protection. Murph9000 ( talk) 20:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 20:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 00:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped after the talk page discussion started.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Talk page of blocked user. 333 -blue 06:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, I do not see why a talk page of a blocked user should be protected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – User repeatedly reverting to a version that is not consistent with the title, neither follows WP:COMMONNAME and WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME. At the same time user is avoiding discussion. SMS Talk 08:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, we do not protect pages against one user. Try WP:3RRN, and, if it does not help, WP:ANI.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 99.53.112.186 ( talk) 15:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP and logged in vandals all adding nonsense about manatees and situations. Dan D. Ric ( talk) 10:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP edit warring false info. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 12:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Dynamic IP same geo location in Spain. Info being added is specifically and directly refuted by very well-referenced article content. Been going on since at least January 2016 (in checking actually started August 2014). Article has been fairly stable except for this. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 13:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Largoplazo ( talk) 12:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP NPOV policy violations. Repeated edits to remove well-sourced but critical information about article subject's past business ventures, replaced with unsourced positive claims and positive claims that are sourced to quotes from the article's subject himself without verification. Michael Gastauer is currently seeking €200m in investment in his company, and I believe he is attempting to keep investors from learning about the controversies associated with his past business ventures. 07:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending changes protection level 2: Page was immediately reverted after temporary semi-protection by MarcelS789, who has only contributed to WB21 and Michael Gastauer pages. Clearly someone is determined to scrub page of any critical information, semi-protection apparently not enough to deter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fin3999 ( talkcontribs) 08:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
No way. If semi=-protection is not sufficient, please follow the dispute resolution avenues. WP:COIN could be the first stop.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Ah ok, I have posted it there already so I guess I will just wait for a response — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fin3999 ( talkcontribs) 09:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of the same unsourced message by various IP editors. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent spate of multi-ip vandalism. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 02:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multi-ip vandalism, same as to Jay Park (see preceding rpp entry). ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 02:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP inaccurate material. Rumours of his 'death' are circulating from unreliable sources. Reliable sources are stating that he is alive and well and has recovered from his illness. Spiderone 08:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done, pending changes already set, and the intensity of unconstructive edits clearly goes down.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:19, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GXXF TC 12:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Jc37. at 16:42 UTC, 5 November 2012 N-C16 ( talk) 07:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 23:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr ( talk) 23:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. H akan· IST 07:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent SPA and IP vandalism in which somebody seems to want to conflate the subject with a videogamer. DanielRigal ( talk) 14:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 22:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruption keeps happening over and over again every international break. Qed237  (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

10 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Extensive IP vandalism and troll accounts. Nobel laureate today, so the target of both weird conspiracy theorists and IPs doing random changes and/or changing his nationality. ~~

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr ( talk) 15:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 16:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lower page protection from fully-protected to allow template editors. 22 of the 25 {{ IUCN}}-template family are unprotected or semi-protected (autoconfirmed can edit), so it seems weird that {{ IUCN2006}}, {{ IUCN2008}}, & {{ IUCN2009.1}} are fully protected.   ~  Tom.Reding ( talkdgaf)  20:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected More than 2600 transclusions, so I won't lower it to semi. Katie talk 15:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
KrakatoaKatie, I don't understand your reasoning; {{ This is a redirect}}, for example, has over 277,000 transclusions, but is still template-editor editable. The case for restricting editing to administrators only has not been made.   ~  Tom.Reding ( talkdgaf)  16:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Tom.Reding: Please read what I wrote again. I lowered it to template-protected, and I just checked again to be sure I did it correctly. Katie talk 18:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user is vandalising the page. A short term protection would help. jojo@nthony ( talk) 06:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by people who think it's cute to add Presidential Debate viral star Kenneth Bone. -- Floatjon ( talk) 15:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 15:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lower page protection from fully-protected to allow template editors. 22 of the 25 {{ IUCN}}-template family are unprotected or semi-protected (autoconfirmed can edit), so it seems weird that {{ IUCN2006}}, {{ IUCN2008}}, & {{ IUCN2009.1}} are fully protected.   ~  Tom.Reding ( talkdgaf)  20:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done. This one is template-protected, not fully protected. Katie talk 15:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lower page protection from fully-protected to allow template editors. 22 of the 25 {{ IUCN}}-template family are unprotected or semi-protected (autoconfirmed can edit), so it seems weird that {{ IUCN2006}}, {{ IUCN2008}}, & {{ IUCN2009.1}} are fully protected.   ~  Tom.Reding ( talkdgaf)  20:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected Katie talk 15:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of bogus info. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 15:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 12:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of "Nick Mullen". . EvergreenFir (talk) 20:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 12:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Qit16 ( talk) 21:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 12:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anons and new contributors repeatedly inserting unsourced info. Sitush ( talk) 10:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 04:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP is back POV pushing. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 03:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 04:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – COI editor refuses to discuss. WP:OWN issues. unsourced unencyclopedic content. John from Idegon ( talk) 04:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 04:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of the same unsourced and NPOV term 'affluent' by various IP editors. Ryecatcher773 ( talk) 06:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 04:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two accounts but clearly the same editor introducing deliberate factual errors. JohnBlackburne words deeds 14:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Blocked one of the socks, warned the other. Otherwise not enough disruption to warrant protection MusikAnimal talk 04:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I realise from one perspective this appears cheeky since I have engaged in a battle this past two days, but the fact is that one IP (or IP range) who has his own concept of what "related people" constitutes is constantly adding unsourced items to the infobox category. Prior to my bold intervention, I checked every talk page archive to see if or where this was discussed, and it hasn't even been broached over the years. My purpose for this temporary measure is merely to encourage this IP to slow down and use the talk page rather than popping up to restore his version any time he wishes and leaving sarcastic remarks in the edit summary. Note I am not advocating my preffered version is best but there are issues and I am happy to discuss them (and will begin this with my next edit from this post). The other thing is, I have no phobia for IPs and I too have for one reason or another edited when logged out (nothing illegitimate), but when one wishes to assert himself with such a stiff neck then it would be nice if he at least created an account or logged in so as to come in from behind the mask. All we have at the moment is a cloak and dagger and this makes direct communication awkward!!!!!!!. OJ ( talk) 14:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined You're dealing with a single IP, so please use their talk page to point out the discussion you've started on the article talk page. Edit summaries are not effective MusikAnimal talk 04:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing. False edits are being made by IPs and anonymous users by changing venues and attendance numbers. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 05:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by IPs range from 115. as well block evasion as the user behind this are known as User:Parkchiqmu which has been previously blocked for disruptive editing. All IPs range he use can be seen on his suspected IPs list on his userpage. Similar reason for the protection of Malaysia national under-23 football team and Malaysia national under-22 football team, as well the previous protection of Malaysia national football team. The IPs disruptive behaviour has been long overdue and I suggest all four pages should be protect for an indefinite of time to prevent further damages to the articles. More info can be seen on every articles history page. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 11:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Liebe99 ( talk) 06:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full-protection: - Multiple editors are edit warning over this 1RR article involving the number of candidates in the info-box. There is an ongoing RfC here: Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#A call for consensus on McMullin and Castle that should be respected. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 23:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 02:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism due to recent game ending. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed as soon as the last 3-month period expired MusikAnimal talk 04:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 01:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done by Bongwarrior; semi'd for three days. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 01:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous I.P. vandalism. Altering/removing sourced contents and adding caste promotional unsourced information. MahenSingha (Talk) 04:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP and redletter vandalism . John from Idegon ( talk) 05:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to force change by dynamic IP. Alexbrn ( talk) 11:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry. BilCat ( talk) 21:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Looks like an edit war originating from a couple of days ago. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeat insertion of nonsense allegation by IP. As this is a sensitive article of current interest, it ought to be protected. Iselilja ( talk) 22:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Someguy1221. MusikAnimal talk 04:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in revisions 743085127, 742676583, 741849159, and 741515566. Eric S.V. ( talk) 22:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (in two minds but a big complex page and possibly easy to overlook problems. Might need something longer term) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors ignoring notes/Talk page discussion. Repetitive disruptive editions. Extended full protected recommended. LLArrow ( talk) 22:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper (with a distinct edit summary style) keeps adding irrelevant, possibly BLP-vio links to "See also" section. ansh 666 23:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism mostly from a range including 68.132.14.156. Rangeblock or semi please. John from Idegon ( talk) 02:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could this and all other World Cup related articles be protected from the disruptive dynamic IP adding unsourced content?. Qed237  (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued after release of prior protection . - Mlpearc ( open channel) 19:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (given there is a bit of soccer vandalism going round) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

11 October 2016

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by different IPs DVdm ( talk) 18:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike VTalk 20:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 20:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; article repeatedly reverted back to its original form, which is unorganized and poorly sourced. There are several flaws that needed to be fixed that the anonymous IP editors don't know of yet. It is also in need of expansion. Thank you. WikiFanCreator2010 ( talk) 20:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Kurdish–Turkish conflict & Turkish military intervention in Syria

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Different IPs (possibly same editor) are making unsourced (possibly POV) changes to the casualty figures in the infoboxes of the two articles. He has been constantly reverted by me and a few other editors and we have repeatedly requested that he provide sources for his edits, but we have been ignored. His edits have also messed up the look of one of the infobox every time due to bunching. EkoGraf ( talk) 16:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Featured page for today, lots of unwanted attention from vandals... TJH2018 talk 16:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism by IP's as well as socks in box office details. Essex-1799 ( talk) 17:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 19:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Protection expired and BLP vios/vandalism immediately resumed. Nymf ( talk) 19:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short Semiprot requested, multiple IPs from different ranges making changes to fictional character's death date/location. Suspect some sort of off wiki effort, due to today's date being the character's fictional death. -- ferret ( talk) 19:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. . Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: User page vandalisim. Timothy Robinson12345 14:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined, so far you only edited the page yourself.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP and newly-created accounts vandalizing page. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for 7 days by Widr. Mike VTalk 18:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returning vandalism from switching IP. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 19:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism or require skilled monitoring. Also look into Procrastinus ( talk · contribs · count) possibly a sock and see if any blocks are applicable. 59.96.59.133 ( talk) 18:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism from multiple IP editors. Strongjam ( talk) 15:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Lift move-protection: I closed the RM at the Talk:Rajneesh#Requested move 13 September 2016 (NAC; page-mover) to Osho. The article was indefinitely move-protected by Slon02, who seems inactive. Please also execute WP:SWAP with Osho, or ping me to do that. Thanks. No such user ( talk) 09:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotected @ No such user: I'll let you do the move. Let me know if it needs to be locked again. Katie talk 16:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism has returned. Daß Wölf ( talk) 18:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite Semi-protection: Very frequent vandalism as it is often associated with Islamic terrorism. High level of IP vandalism. NikolaiHo Talk 20:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection or Reduce to pending changes: Very little activity; vandalism that does occur is quickly reverted, pending changes may be more appropriate here... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 04:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Mike VTalk 16:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism and disruption due to popularity in the news. Requires semi protection until event fades away. NikolaiHo Talk 17:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Second article with this same issue. — Patrug ( talk) 01:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the Trump. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the Bush. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katie talk 16:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. This article has been subjected to an all-out edit war from countless anonymous people over the past few months. I'd like to wade in and try to fix it but given how much obvious IP-hopping is going on, it seems pointless to try without semi-protection. RunnyAmigatalk 20:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long term dispute/edit war over licensee

Temporary semi-protection: A dynamic IP editor has repeatedly misrepresented facts about which company licenced these anime series for home video distribution. Dispite revert from multiple editors, the IP continues to insert their preferred version. Crunchyroll (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was already protected by Yamaguchi先生 for similar reasons — Farix ( t |  c) 20:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. More annoying vandalism from same user: 86.163.71.180 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) aka 86.172.15.239 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) 86.163.71.151 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) 217.42.177.7 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) Nigej ( talk) 06:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Cahk ( talk) 07:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: As three cases above re the article page, edit-warring by IP socks of Janagewen. Jeh ( talk) 08:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Spartacus! t@lk 08:39, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Frequent financial changes in the article. Charles Turing ( talk) 08:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 09:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user repeatedly deleting sourced content: 2001:8003:84EF:7000:9103:55A:95B:8A18, 2001:8003:84EF:7000:3D46:82B2:B753:5707, 101.186.87.123. Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection for auto-confirmed users only: A user has begun changing the introduction constantly without having a proper discussion or looking at the sources published on the page. This page should be "temporarily protected for auto-confirmed users only" who will not disrupt the introduction that has been accepted by established users, some who have been on Wikipedia for six years. Yes I know by doing this, I will not be able to edit it but I do not intend to make edits to the page. I have been the only one reverting this user's edits because not many people frequent that page. The user who continues to do this has the term, "Desi" in their user name and it appears to be that this is the only page they edit, which is fine but they shouldn't try to control it, especially without having a proper discussion. If this can't be done, could someone please tell them to stop because they don't seem to listen to what I say. I don't understand how one can defy the sources published, including removing one source, on the page and think they can get away with it. I find it deeply offensive that they are saying I'm discriminating some South Asian ethnic groups, I don't know how I'm discriminating because none of the edits are discriminating, if they were they wouldn't be on Wikipedia in the first place. ( 121.220.96.223 ( talk) 10:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last protection just ended and the vandalism has started again. If you want to see the amount of vandalism that this page receives when unprotected, look at the edit history for October 6 (night of the most recent episode). APK whisper in my ear 13:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Too much vandalism for pending changes to be feasible. Lizard ( talk) 18:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of cited content and insertion of (mostly) uncited content by IP editors and SPAs. Edwardx ( talk) 20:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of cited content (and addition material of uncited) by SPA, who has repeatedly done similar editing to the article of the son, O.D. Kobo, so we can expect more of the same. Edwardx ( talk) 20:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent drama about player, BLP violations, also see this. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 14:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporarily semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring and other disruption by unregistered accounts. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 17:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ CambridgeBayWeather: My protection got applied over yours without my intending to, but in any case I think a month is justifiable here, given the history of disruption. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits in article's financial details. Frequently changing without an explanation. Charles Turing ( talk) 17:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been undergoing persistent disruption for days. Requires protection. Mar4d ( talk) 17:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 12:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, ignoring sources and warnings. Coltsfan ( talk) 11:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 05:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One IP hopper, who seems also to have registered an account, is repeatedly inserting poor information. See this for some background. Sitush ( talk) 05:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:12, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: The same content has been added here, here, here among other times, by IPs/throwaway accounts. This falls under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Kingsindian    23:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 02:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by socks. SMS Talk 02:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Ppt1973 ( talk) 02:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent IP vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 04:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 05:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Magic word template. GXXF TC 20:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 21:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just two IPs, both from a school. I gave an only warning, and they can easily be blocked if it continues. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet ( talk) 21:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Personal attacks, multiple IPs. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/24.114.102.210 and Special:Contributions/24.114.107.30. Binksternet ( talk) 04:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you Binksternet for coming to my aid. This unregistered user is out of control. I will be needing page protection. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 05:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Widr.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General05:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring by IP sockpuppets of long-time serial sockpuppeteer Janagewen ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (see current SP case, archive). Jeh ( talk) 06:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry - At least four sockpuppetry accounts has been blocked that were creating Hoax articles allegedly claiming them to be a part of Hum TV network programming. Moreover another sockpuppet has been detected and already been reported, other users continuously adding unnecessary information that doesn't meet Wikipedia guidelines. I have been removing them manually. So indefinite semi-protection will protect the page from disruptive editing. Nauriya ( Rendezvous) 16:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Could you please specifically provide diffs to sockpuppet edits in this article? I see some back-and-forth reverting but no immediate vandalism.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Ymblanter: The other IP's appear to be sockpuppets of this IP. Regards. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 00:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 05:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 16:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Oshwah for two weeks. tutterMouse ( talk) 06:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user was recently trying to remove lots of things from the article. -- AI RPer ( talk) 22:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Norschweden is genre warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 23:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 00:36, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending-changes protection. Hunter, a professional soccer goalkeeper who primarily played in the 1920s, shares his name with a major character from the video game FIFA 17. His page is regularly targeted by anonymous users trying to swap out factual information regarding the real person with fictitious stuff from the game. He just emerged from eight days' worth of p-c protection (paging User:Tassedethe, who clicked the lock) and the kids are back, crapping it up. RunnyAmigatalk 20:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much activity for pending changes. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of uncited material and original research. Dark Knight 2149 20:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Receiving vandalism due to meme from the U.S. presidential election debates surrounding an otherwise unrelated person named Kenneth Bone (whose article is currently up for deletion as a WP:BLP1E violation). ViperSnake151  Talk  04:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 04:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit-waring by new users. Huldra ( talk) 21:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please make it permanent ECP per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 instead. Thank you. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 03:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war, ignoring talk page discussion. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I took this there for you. Katie talk 15:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Or long-term pending changes. Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 23:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very little useful editing from unregistered users. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 23:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed (indef): Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP sock. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment: Why would extended confirmed by needed for IP socks? FWIW, a rangeblock on 69.65.45.48/29 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)) would keep them out of the way for awhile... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 00:39, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected. With semiprotection, which is all that was needed. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper ( talk) 02:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#500.2F30. nableezy - 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC) 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: For at least the past 6 months, sometimes as frequently as every day, IPs (most likely the same person) have been changing the player's height. The change sometimes goes days before being reverted. Lizard ( talk) 00:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past week. Lizard ( talk) 01:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

12 October 2016

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 18:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of AfD template by IP user. [6] [7] [8]. Jbh Talk 20:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent reverting back and forth of inappropriate images from the IP user. (P.S. he already violated the 3RR). Nickag989 talk 20:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This isn't a content dispute. It's disruption. @ Nickag989: The IP user's talk page is redlinked. I can't block him for 3RR if he's never been warned, so fix that, k? Katie talk 20:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Green tickY Done. Nickag989 talk 21:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant stream of vandalism from IPs. Page has a long history of vandalism and long periods of semi protection. Seems like time for another. Last semi was 1 year from December 2014 to December 2015. Murph9000 ( talk) 20:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We've never tried PC before, so let's see what happens. Katie talk 21:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Saraiki_dialect_dispute. Disruptive editing including tendentious use of dispute resolution process by unregistered editors. I am aware that semi-protection of a talk page is unusual, but is necessary in this case. The unregistered editors can always create accounts. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has started on this referee, born in Manchester, as he will referee Manchester United vs Liverpool next monday. I suggest a two week protection to cover the match. Qed237  (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 19:14, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High, constant level of IP vandalism going uncorrected for weeks. 9 3 04:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated harassment by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo (based on geolocation). - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 09:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Appears to have calmed down since the report was filed, and any semi-protection of a user talk page would be for a very short duration. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On going vandalism by unauthenticated users from a set of IPs. LHH 07 ( talk) 10:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Single IP continuing the vandalism - reblocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: -- incessant IP vandalism (see [9]). Quis separabit? 13:37, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Already pending changes protected and no reason to increase the protection level at this time. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 16:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 16:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated posting of misplaced self promotion - user has been warned and reverted several time. ww2censor ( talk) 09:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 14:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated interjection of false movie titles over the last month or more. Spshu ( talk) 17:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vejlenser ( talk) 18:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Slow-moving overall vandalism, some evidence of helpful non-autoconfirmed edits. Airplaneman 18:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism from an IP, multiple new accounts. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 14:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MartinZ02 ( talk) 14:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Reports of death are definitely not confirmed. Thechased ( talk) 16:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:44, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 05:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a tied to their loss yesterday, so the vandalism should die out quickly with a new news cycle. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism BLP unsourced claims of bisexualism, drug use. Jim1138 ( talk) 09:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, due to being on the Main page (On this day). Today and tomorrow should be enough, I think. -- HyperGaruda ( talk) 10:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism alongside edit warring. NasssaNser ( talk/ edits) 10:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after protection recently expired. Entranced98 ( talk) 14:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:17, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 14-month edit war, ignoring active RFC . Elizium23 ( talk) 14:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Elizium23: it would be helpful if you would give a couple of diffs here, because it is difficult to see the issue you are referring to amidst all the other edits going on. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. A 14-month edit war would be handled much better at that venue. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock ( talk) 04:14, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by an IP editor trying to insert POV content into the article. Editor has been reverted by two other editors besides myself and has been warned on the user talk, but does not seem to be interested in discussing things. IP has reverted 7 times today alone within the past hour and based upon some of the edit sums and other edits made by the same IP, this appears to be an attempt at WP:RGW. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 08:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

IP blocked, but same POV edits now started by new IP. IdreamofJeanie ( talk) 09:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
A third IP has started making the same edits. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 11:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 11:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots and lots of IP vandalism lately. Justin15w ( talk) 02:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 03:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 04:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This player has agreed to a trade in principle [10] but nothing is official until papers are lodged which has been estimated to be next week. There has already been high levels of disruptive editing to say the trade has been completed, can we please have protection on this page for a week until the trade has been completed as 24 hours will not be long enough. Flickerd ( talk) 06:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism, apparently by an IP hopper. — Smjg ( talk) 22:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Safehaven86 ( talk) 01:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism recently, includes blanking. — JJBers ( talk) 02:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war invloving me, FilmandTVFan, Mkr and 75.185 (among others) constantly reverting an IPv6-hopping hoaxer. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: To prevent people from editing my User page randomly. WebCiteTalk 00:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Not going with full as there is no evidence of a problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Hairhorn ( talk) 00:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Low frequency vandalism from IP addresses. Although the page has seen substantially low activity, almost every IP edit(s) are unconstructive. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 01:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/BEYHIVE. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 01:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Protection: Slow moving edit war. Other editor has been directed to the talk page in edit summaries and a resent warning. Spshu ( talk) 13:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I would suggest trying some form of dispute resolution, such as WP:3O or WP:DRN. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Dispute resolution will not step in until discussion has occurred between the parties. The discussion already there does not involved this new editor. Spshu ( talk) 21:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP users have been edit warring/removing content for an extended period of time at this article. Needs indefinite semi-protection. -- Dane2007 talk 23:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Edit request (protected talk page): Please change both instances of <span /> to <nowiki /> to remove this page from Category:Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags. Thanks. P.S. I looked pretty hard at the top of this page, but I was unable to find instructions for how to post an edit request for a protected talk page. Are the instructions there? – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

You're in the right place, just that you're going to have to explain what needs editing as admins can't be expected to wade through it to find these two instances. tutterMouse ( talk) 11:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Unprotected by Xaosflux. Mike VTalk 16:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Product's discontinuation was announced, so it's getting a lot of vandalism and random blanking. Thechased ( talk) 16:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined for now. The most disruptive user has been blocked and I'm seeing a lot of constructive IP edits. Let us know if the situation changes. :-) Katie talk 17:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – all-too-common-vandal-target. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 17:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike VTalk 18:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 22:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

13 October 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SatDis ( talk) 00:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full-protection or pending changes: Edit war on the question if he is king yet. -- RJFF ( talk) 16:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping edit warrior repeatedly reverting against consensus nearly every day since October 6. Edgeweyes ( talk) 17:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target for misplaced edits by new users. Everymorning (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For the past few months the article has been polluted by incompetent edits from a sock operator (Vicky12333) as well as a slew of IP editors who keep bringing the article out of alignment with MOS:TV and WP:SLASH. Editors delete prose in favor of ambiguous slashes between character names for example here, where instead of prose that explains that an actor is portraying a dual role, slashes are restored, which makes the resulting information ambigous. I've opened several discussions on the talk page about various issues noting what established protocols are, but none of the disruptive editors have participated in discussion, and they are not likely to.

Requesting 1 month semi to inspire discussion from the IPs. The disruptions are irritating and completely ass-backwards, and given the weirdness of the changes, it's very likely that some of the IPs are Vicky12333 editing while logged out. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism that has not gone away no matter how long someone protects the page. Given that, and the article's WP:GA status I am asking for indefinite protection. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 19:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —  Yellow Dingo  (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 11:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping disruptive edit warrior. Edgeweyes ( talk) 17:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon ( talk) 17:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Good long semi: Long term sustained vandalism. TimothyJosephWood 17:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 18:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High Traffic Page Timothy Robinson12345 ( talk) 12:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC). Timothy Robinson12345 ( talk) 12:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 14:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: I am writing on behalf of Acharya Balkrishna MD Patanjali Ayurved to protect this page from misleading and unknowingly edit and vandalism. Nandikingsuk ( talk) 13:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 14:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recent vandalism on this article. Requesting protection through November 9, 2016 for the US Presidential Election. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: IP vandalism. IPs continue to revert edits regarding her citizenship.— Fundude99 talk to me 18:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see this has been discussed at length on the talk page, but I'm not seeing a clear consensus on the issue. So, what we're looking at here is edit warring, not vandalism reverting. I suggest a proper WP:RFC on the subject to determine consensus. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Timothy Robinson12345 ( talk) 13:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined He's never edited his user talk page. Please make sure you understand the protection policy before reporting again. Katie talk 14:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: User Page Request . Timothy Robinson12345 ( talk) 13:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined No one else has edited it, and per WP:UPROT there should be a need. Katie talk 14:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to no protection. This is a redirect page that has been indefinitely protected since 2008. It's unlikely that this former article will be recreated. All I'm trying to do is change the target of the redirect. AHI-3000 ( talk) 03:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

To where? It'd be easier for an admin to simply change the redirect than unprotect. tutterMouse ( talk) 06:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
See the talk page. And the reason I suggest removing the full protection is because there's no reason whatsoever to make it permanent; the page has been locked for about 8 years now, I don't see how anyone will want to mess around with it in the present. AHI-3000 ( talk) 16:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Unprotected Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. agtx 23:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mrnetbean ( talk) 11:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Olivier. Katie talk 14:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: For some reason that is beyond me this bot page is continuously vandalized by IPs. Please semi-protect permanently. bender235 ( talk) 12:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Katie talk 14:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple edits regarding cause of death with no sources/. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, a reliable source has been added-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the protection is down, immediately vandals come back to my page. . RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ RickinBaltimore: If you don't have an alternate talk page set up for IP users, it would be a good idea to do that now. Katie talk 14:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – I think this page needs to be salted obviously, target of a well-known LTA troll. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Katie talk 14:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recent ongoing vandalism by associated accounts, probable meat or sock puppets - has now extended to Wikisource. Shearonink ( talk) 14:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 14:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 23:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 00:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6 revert-warring vandal. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 03:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 03:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 18:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Slow, but steady IP vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 03:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Slow, but steady IP vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 03:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semiprotection: Page sees almost constant vandalism from ip vandals, school ip vandals in particular.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 01:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Champaign Supernova ( talk) 01:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 01:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from rotating IPs. UW Dawgs ( talk) 02:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced changes to numbers on the article. Magnolia677 ( talk) 02:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already kicking back with the vandalism I really couldn't believe, maybe because it's in the Main Page. — JJBers ( talk) 02:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption. Multiple edits blanking sections. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nqr9 ( talk) 00:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser ( talk) 01:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 01:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Resolute. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 03:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect that page to avoid vandalism. GXXF TC 19:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 22:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Mezigue ( talk) 20:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Katie talk 21:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: This article contains a high level of vandalism. Previous protection of the article expired on July 25, 2016. Note: I am one of Walmart's representatives on Wikipedia and I have a financial conflict of interest. I will also post a note on the Walmart Talk page notifying editors there that I have submitted this request. JLD at Walmart ( talk) 21:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Reviewing Admin see Notice of page protection request. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 21:17, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Thanks, JLD at Walmart, for your transparency, and Mlpearc for the helpful note—though I must say, the article is definitely a perennial vandalism magnet, and I would therefore argue that any page protection applied to this article would not be pre-emptive. I waffled back and forth a bit on whether to semi protect or pending protect. There's a high vandalism-to-helpful edits ratio, and it can be argued that semi protection would save some editors' time. Yet, I do see some good anonymous contributions, so I want to keep that an option. I've followed the precedent laid out in the protection log and reapplied pending changes, indefinitely. Of course, if vandalism becomes rampant, temporary semi protection can help solve that. Airplaneman 22:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Very good, thank you, Mlpearc Phone ( open channel) 23:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please increase the type of protection as this article has recently been attracting persistent vandalism re: the internet meme of Ted Cruz being the Zodiac Killer. The info is more appropriately covered at Zodiac Killer in popular culture. Shearonink ( talk) 19:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow motion edit warring - IP hopper keeps removing certain groups from infobox. ansh 666 20:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As per the protection log, this looks to be a long term problem. Giving it 3 more months. Airplaneman 22:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism & edit warring by IP addresses which appear to be related. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nationalist vandalism, removal of sources by various IP adresses. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 16:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several temporary semi protections have not helped - when protection is lifted, the vandalism resumes. bonadea contributions talk 21:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 21:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all the 42 edits in the past 30 days have been vandalism or its reversion. This page is a perennial magnet for vandalism. It has been protected many times before, generally for much too short times, in the mistaken hope, I suppose, that things will improve. Instead, vandalism simply resumes, starting the cycle over. Therefore requesting permanent protection. Hertz1888 ( talk) 21:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 22:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Identified as a hot target for BLP vandalism. See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard § Dan Senor. The related article already has PC protection. Murph9000 ( talk) 22:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I understand that Donald Trump Access Hollywood controversy is only PC protected, but since this is an actual biography, and there's little to no helpful editing going on, I think semi protection would work better here. Airplaneman 22:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

14 October 2016

Pending Changes or Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism. Ini7 ( talk) 11:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Katie talk 20:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Orphaned files

Full-protection:User continuously removes orphaned fair use tags even thought the files are not used in any articles.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 12:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Files aren't orphaned. They were part of PFC CSKA - Sofia's page which The TV Boy redirected to PFC CSKA Sofia before the page became protected. Those files are part of a content dispute and were uploaded by me because they support facts which were mentioned in the page. I'm going to ask for dispute resolution once the protection expires (10 days from now) which makes the files important because they prove my statements.-- Ivo ( talk) 13:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Non-free files are not used in any article as of now - this means that they are orphaned. This is what the policy says, see WP:F5. If you have the files for yourself, than there is no need for them to exist on Wikipedia, they are still not used anyware as of now. The article your trying to create is just a fork of a different article on the same subject.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 13:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
WP:F5 says: This applies to images and other media that are not under a free license or in the public domain and that are not used in any article. These may be deleted after being identified as such for more than seven days or immediately if the image's only use was on a deleted article and it is very unlikely to have any use on any other valid article. This includes previous revisions of the image. Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article.
And as I already mentioned, I'm going to ask for dispute resolution when the protection of PFC CSKA - Sofia is over. It won't be clear which files will remain in the page until there is a final resolution of the dispute. Also, both files are certainly not very unlikely to have any use on any other valid article. Quite the contrary - they are quite likely to be represented in a future page or a future version of an existing page because they are from a trustworthy source and are relevant to the article.-- Ivo ( talk) 14:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
This tag is a marker that the files are not used in any article from the date the tag is put into - which they are not, which means they are orphaned. After seven days they will be delated, because they are non free, and because they are not included in the article they are intended to, simply because the article does not exist. They are unlikely to be used in any other article, simply because they are irrelevant to any other article. The files are not a source for anything - they are files, they do not source anything, they represent brands and help the reader to understand the topic better. Sources represent other things - such as organisations, media, companies, etc. What you are doing right now is just removing the tag because you don't like it - which is vandalism.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
And again you are doing something just to "make the rules work for you" - misinterpreting and faking facts and sources. Doing such does not prove you right - it only futher proves that you are just doing it because you don't like the information written.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 14:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Both files were part of a previous version of a page which is under protection until 24th September. They are relevant to the article because they are from a neutral source and support a statement which led to a content dispute. Another user who has a different viewpoint is doing his utmost to delete the files because he doesn't like their content. Furthermore, he tried he remove my previous request for protection. -- Ivo ( talk) 14:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
There is already a request for protection of the files - I do not understand what you are doing, other than duplicating the request for no reason. The thing you are doing is not a request at all, thats why I am moving the replays, because they are on the one and the same topic. You are just trying to twist the topic so that the files can be kept, but I already explaned to you very clearly how the policy works.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 14:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
You are requesting a deletion which is completely different. I'm requesting a protection. You removed the files from the page just a few minutes before it became protected which explains why they should not be deleted. The files are very likely to be used in PFC CSKA Sofia, PFC CSKA - Sofia, assuming the pages get separated, something I will ask for, or in another similar page because they support an indisputable fact and are from reliable source. You have no rights to say what is relevant and what is irrelevant when you are taking part in the content dispute. A third opinion or eventually even arbitration will determine the future content of the articles. -- Ivo ( talk) 14:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)-- Ivo reply
I am requesting the same thing, for God's sake! Don't you know English? Read the title "Requests for page protection". I am requesting the pages for the files to be protected, so that you do not remove the tag! The files will be delated after 7 days via the policy, I can't request them to get delated immediately here, there is no such thing.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 14:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Both files Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. @ BG89: This is your warning to stop removing the CSD tags, or I'll block you for disruption. Katie talk 20:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NewEnglandYankee ( talk) 14:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

These files were part of a previous version of a page which is currently under protection. They are relevant to the article because they are from a neutral source and prove a a key fact. For some reason The TV Boy has removed my request several times claiming they are orphaned. -- Ivo ( talk) 14:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

OK, at least it is clear now that you are just playing it dumb and doing it on purpose. Not gonna remove that for admin notice.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 15:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already done. and OP warned to stop removing the tags. Katie talk 20:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A bunch of users are constantly trying to usurp this redirect and convert it to an article on a totally different non-notable subject. I have asked them to create another article (with a disambiguated title), but I don't think they understood or even read the message. I'm asking for temporary semi-protection for 3 days to stop the disruptive editing. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 19:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 20:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Bulgarian football articles

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism and continues entering of false information by both registered users and dynamic IP-s. Obviously one and the same person is vandalizing.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 04:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection for the first, and semi for the second. Really, I think dispute resolution would be the best solution. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 12:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katie talk 20:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Semi: socking and IP hopping disruption over the past few weeks and months. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 07:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry that has been going for a long time. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 12:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 12:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full-protection of redirect page. User continuously tries to duplicate-move article PFC CSKA Sofia as PFC CSKA - Sofia, despite being asked several times to stop, as this is not the name of the football club.-- The TV Boy ( talk · contribs) 05:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prominent help page linked from {{ Multiple issues}}, getting overwritten fairly frequently. John of Reading ( talk) 06:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nutredit ( talk) 06:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and a few autoconfirmed. Orcastrated? Jim1138 ( talk) 08:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yep. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by an IP-hopper since October 9. Softlavender ( talk) 22:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous changing of sourced sales to a false number by IPs. — IB [ Poke ] 04:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 06:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 06:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 16:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 16:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 20:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsaque ( talkcontribs) 22:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. N-C16 ( talk) 00:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Stale. The disruption occurred a week ago. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 22:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 04:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Slow motion edit war for more than a month over a category. Talk page discussion resulted in no consensus. Murders ended in 1929 so significant developments in the near term are unlikely. I realize I'm not supposed to suggest a "right version" but the article was unchanged from Jan 8th until the recent spat. James J. Lambden ( talk) 04:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. -- GouramiWatcher Talk 04:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ips keep changing name in infobox. Pyrusca ( talk) 04:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 04:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Short descriptive header

Temporary semi-protection: Repetitive IP vandalism from a user who is currently under investigation for sock-puppetry. Carbrera ( talk) 02:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I'm the user who Carbrera think she is a sock, and I just have to say that I tried to communicate with them, and they seem to not be willing to do that. They asked for a reason as to why I was making the edits I was, and I gave him one, but they aren't continuing to revert them. They have violated the 3RR rule, and they are trying to justify it by assuming I am a sock. They are clearly not here to edit Wikipedia constructively, so could they be banned please? 156.12.251.74 ( talk) 02:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

You both need to stop edit warring and go to the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, resuming after expiration of previous protection. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by at least three separate IP users. Donner60 ( talk) 02:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of hoax content from the same user behind that "Pinoy GTA IV" nonsense. Blake Gripling ( talk) 03:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP repeatedly adding back content that was rejected by an RFC. McGeddon ( talk) 14:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. @ McGeddon: Blocked a few small ranges which make up all (or almost all) of the IPs. Ping me on my talk page if they pop up again and I'll either protect or block another range. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent changing of sourced height and weight by IPs. Former protection ended yesterday, and the IP is back to changing the information again. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 22:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 22:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

 Not done Procedural - malformed request. Katie talk 23:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ KrakatoaKatie: I'm sorry about that! :/ I just fixed the request... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 23:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low volume of vandalism, but negative edits are consistently being made with very few positive IP edits. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 00:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: To patrolling admin: Please see this discussion before adding protection. I had originally requested a reduction in protection level, and unfortunately, it looks like the change in protection level didn't go over so well with the vandal(s)... 73.96.113.91 ( talk) 01:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've left pending changes in place so it will revert to that when semi expires. Let's see if they go away given a few months. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A mix of IP/new user vandalism and disruptive editing over the last few days. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 01:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht ( talk) 12:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht ( talk) 12:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ~ Manila's Poging Juan 11:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined @ PogingJuan: I do see some back-and-forth on POV, but I'm not seeing a content dispute that requires full protection. Airplaneman 18:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Recent death. Persistent vandalism while this was a WP:BLP. A member of the subject's family had been inserting false claims into the article a few years ago (see the article history for evidence thereof). I knew him as an acquaintance; we'd talk on the phone and were members of the New York State Bar Association together. FWIW, I've previously disclosed this potential COI. Please do us all a favor by semi-protecting for a week or ten days. Also FWIW, I very rarely post on WP:RfPP, and for me to ask this is most serious. Bearian ( talk) 14:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Of the five users who have edited the article since the subject's death, three are admins and the other two are autoconfirmed. Prior to that, the article hadn't been edited since May. No justification or use for semi right now. Katie talk 14:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is an IP that is repeatedly posting legal threats on the page. Currently has a CSD tag, however is page is to be kept it needs to be locked for the time being. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I suggest adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Pretlow‎ to this protection request. Teh same IPs are disrupting the AFD and posting legal threats there as well. Meters ( talk) 20:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Both already indef semi protected. TimothyJosephWood 20:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
(Non-administrator comment) Done for bot. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:6536:3960:643B:B2F5 ( talk) 23:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued additions of unsourced claims on a BLP article. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 21:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – ip jumper with a long history of disruptive/unsourced edits continues to add unsourced/false info. Digifan23 ( talk) 21:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Djadjko ( talk) 22:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Within days of prior protection expiring, same disruption resumed again. The content has been addressed on the talk page, with links to one of the prior discussions on the material. --- Barek ( talkcontribs) - 23:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

15 October 2016

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – The article is attacked by IPs and new editors (probably the same user given that the edit summaries tend to be very similar, but who knows) posting rather bizarre BLP violations about the article subject's young children. Since there are also a lot of constructive edits by other IPs, I would suggest pending changes rather than semi-protection. bonadea contributions talk 12:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, let us wait until the semi-pritection expires, and then apply pending changes if it is needed.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. reddogsix ( talk) 14:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:46, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/65.51.47.202. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, the IP did not edit after warning. If they return, please report them to WP:AIV-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a long-term IP-hopper. See article history for their previous edits. Eik Corell ( talk) 14:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined. This redirect has not been vandalized as opposed to the target, BloodRayne 2, which is now protected. Favonian ( talk) 16:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: I would rather have my page only edited by me only. Dre~ ( talk) 03:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – due to the Wikiproject information about the vandalism . Dre~ ( talk) 03:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Students at this school add their selves to the famous people list. and other vandalism. . Dre~ ( talk) 03:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: page has been subject to frequent vandalism from an IP address. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 20:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RF23 ( talk) 02:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. agtx 02:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism - minimum 3-month semi-protection recommended. DPH1110 ( talk) 18:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's been higher volume for the past couple days, but typically pending changes is sufficient for this page. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism - it's been happening for a very very long time already. 92slim ( talk) 14:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on revisions 744346439 and 744346288 by 74.50.133.148. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkness3560 ( talk) 01:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And indefinite PC protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been consistent IP based disruptive editing and vandalism.... Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 13:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protection: High-risk template – Recent target of template vandalism; is transcluded into a large number of pages. gobonobo + c 03:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Heir to the throne has not yet been entrhoned, but is consistently re-added to the list Korossyl ( talk) 17:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ipsocks of MariaJaydHicky making the puppeteers signature edit: Unsourced,undiscussed changes of Black Eyed Peas' genre from pop to R&B. SummerPhD v2.0 04:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP and new users. Nickag989 talk 07:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite: David SK Lee has already been salted recently but proposed page was linked to it. Donnie Park ( talk) 13:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 17:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP editing most likely sock-puppetry, adding groups (specifically SF9) that have non-existent pages when it says not to in the editing page. Alicia leo86 ( talk) 14:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Long-term BLP violations and just general vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles ( talk) 16:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by IPs to add what some would regard as unnecessary detail about his personal life. PatGallacher ( talk) 16:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism over IP-hopping vandal. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The same sockpupetry has returned. This has been going on for almost as long as the article has existed, temporary protection is not effective. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 17:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding district page info in this page. Vin09(talk) 05:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 04:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One AfD and one G7 (after an A7) are not enough to justify salting. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New user vandalism. Cotton2 ( talk) 05:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or Pending changes High level of IP/new user vandalism adding false information about events into the future or blanketing the page. Any kind of protection welcome possibly until 2nd week of December when the finale will happen for the show. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 05:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 05:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., should be good enough for pending changes.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced BLP content. Blake Gripling ( talk) 09:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another IP-hopping vandal causing problems. Temporary semi-protection (about a week) should prompt them to go elsewhere when they get bored. McDoob AU93 12:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Doug Weller.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inputting unreliable channels which is not announced by the network. Hamham31 Heke! KushKush! 05:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection for one month. We have one or more IPs who keep removing content. Jytdog ( talk) 05:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not quite see how two months could be justified, but feel free to bring it back here if disruptive editing resumes after the expiration of the protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Mandruss  07:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Thanks, but I prefer not to have my talk page semi-protected. The disruption appears to have stopped as well. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Request for permanent protection of /info/en/?search=Philippine_Atheists_and_Agnostics_Society Dear Admins, AS long as that page stays like that forever and will not be vandalized again and again..then that would be awesome. May I request for a permanent protection please. Kind regards Hapimarissa ( talk) 00:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: A further five or six acts of vandalism in the last 24 hours. A view of the public logs shows that this article has been a long-term target for vandalism and serious BLP violations, with the latest one year temporary block lifted earlier this month. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 05:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- 1990'sguy ( talk) 23:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Fangusu. It has been over a year since any IP or non-confirmed account has edited this page, that did not turn out to be a Fangusu sock. She just waits around for semiprotection to come off and then comes right back. Please protect indefinitely. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 23:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – major blp problems from multiple accounts. agtx 04:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator Bu Rob13. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:A80B:BEBE:2223:918F ( talk) 04:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 22:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 22:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 22:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator DMacks. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 00:46, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Remove create protection: This was salted back in 2008 because people were trying to create the article before the album came out. We already have the article now ( The E.N.D). I want to turn the old one into a redirect. Pretty uncontroversial, thanks Acer ( talk) 21:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done I created the redirect. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

16 October 2016

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel) 21:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Valid at the time, but now stale. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple ips. agtx 00:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Valid request at the time, but it's now stale. After an initial burst of vandalism, no issues in the past ~16 hours. Report again if it reoccurs. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from a single IP-hopping vandal, using both logins at school (specifically, the Visalia Unified School District in California, USA) and at home (IPv6 address locates to same city in California). Need to disable unconfirmed edits until this person either gets bored or is reported to their school and/or ISP. McDoob AU93 16:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Report again or ping me if he hops IPs, but he's been stable on that IPv6 for a while. I can block the /64 range if necessary. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Katie talk 13:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection until after silly season: Getting bombed by IPs with regard to Hillary Clinton. Jytdog ( talk) 03:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only one IP. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after she won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 2. Kbabej ( talk) 17:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – FA article that has been getting a high level of vandalism today. John from Idegon ( talk) 21:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal changing flinders to flinder seems to be back. A picture of a dead fish ( talk) 12:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓ Hello 71 12:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This user page is being vandalized by IPs. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I meant temporary semi-protection. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected. Favonian ( talk) 17:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected. Favonian ( talk) 17:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism using false excuses – vandalism from multiple IPs. Mawlidman ( talk) 02:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after Katya lost RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 2. Kbabej ( talk) 03:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: - vandalism.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 13:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Zagalejo. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and non-autoconfirmed users keep removing AfD templates. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Semi: Persistent vandalism. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 14:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Currently used by {{ Based on}}, 10K transclusions. —  Andy W. ( talk) 16:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected ~ Rob13 Talk 16:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Edit warring with various anonymous IPs reinserting the same unsourced information. I've been unable to find a good source to put in there to confirm their edit. Air.light ( talk) 23:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 13:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 user edit-warring to add death hoax. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Sadly, it looks like it is actually true. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive redirect vandalism. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 11:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. A range block is now in place, and since El Jimbo likes to bask in the glory of an open door policy, yadayada, we should probably leave the page unprotected until the next onslaught. Favonian ( talk) 11:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New users appearing repeated edits of recently-banned sock. Nat Gertler ( talk) 04:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ NatGertler: Report the sockpuppetry at WP:SPI, please. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 05:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 13:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 08:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs continue to add content without reliable sources, and also change content contrary to what is within sources provided. — MelbourneStar talk 11:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet ( talk) 22:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for 3 days by Acroterion. tutterMouse ( talk) 11:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Continuous IP and new user vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 05:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full-protection: - per disruptive edit dispute which seem to be nowhere near an ending. -- BabbaQ ( talk) 11:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 13:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: for one month. IPs continually making changes based on a claim that deaf people find the term "hearing impaired" objectionable; no refs, just edit warring in the lead. Jytdog ( talk) 19:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP hoppers. Katniss 20:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page's entire history (going back to its creation in April of this year) is IPs redirecting this page to Fred Flintstone or some variant, related to some kind of internet meme. It was discussed at RfD and determined that this should point to grandparent. Consensus can change, if someone wants to open a discussion about it, but there's no reason to allow this disruption to continue. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 01:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 06:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by IP users. -- Dane2007 talk 05:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeated BLP-vandalism by block-evading SPAs. Please also revdel and block the newest vandalism-only account / duck (BouncingJamAolla). GermanJoe ( talk) 17:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Persistent abuse, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 21:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 06:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This AfD page has been edited by various blocked sockpuppets whose usernames end in "is my homie". GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GB fan. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. reddogsix ( talk) 14:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. ~ Manila's Poging Juan 18:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: An IP editor has been persistently deleting references and adding unsourced data to this article, despite my warnings not to do so and my attempts to discuss the issue on the article talk page. Cordless Larry ( talk) 19:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. @ Cordless Larry: Range blocked for a week. Let me know if this continues after the week is up and a longer-term block can be applied. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Long-term steady, but slow vandalism. There has not been one IP edit that has been constructive on this article, and making this pending changes indefinite won't hurt constructive IP edits, that may appear once in a blue moon... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:A80B:BEBE:2223:918F ( talk) 02:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending changes level 1 protection
Unnotable and unsourced addititions by anonymous IP-address contributors (in good faith), usually as a means of self-promotion. The changes are infrequent enough to not warrant semi-protection, but still happen multiple times a week and have started to disrupt cleaning up the list by requiring to keep an eye on the article every day. For consideration, I am also a major contributor to the article, so semi-protection would not be appropriate. 80.221.159.67 ( talk) 16:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC) (edited: 16:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)) reply
Declined This is borderline of being too high activity for pending changes, but moreover, the average reviewer won't know what isn't notable and is likely to just pass the edits through without realizing the issue. I'd be willing to semi-protect the article, but that would indeed block you out as well. Would you be willing to register an account to contribute through semi-protection? ~ Rob13 Talk 17:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ BU Rob13: no Declining to edit with a registered user account, so I will decline the semi-protection as well. Using Wikipedia:Edit requests process for semi-protected edits could be too hindering.
In regards to reviewers, if a list entry to be added to the article has a Wikipedia article, it is probably notable for inclusion per WP:CSC. I still understand the issue for reviewers, as some level of technical expertise is required for a full review. Moreover, the list has lots of unnotable entries already, so this could confuse the reviewers even further.
I also acknowledge that Wikipedia:Editnotice would not be appropriate.
Regardless, I will accept the outcome of this declination of protection. 80.221.159.67 ( talk) 17:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC) (edited: 18:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)) reply

17 October 2016

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism even after being reported at AN3. Crovata ( talk) 01:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. See response there. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A fan of this team is claiming that the colours used do not accurately reflect the team's. I entered a discussion with the editor on the editor's talk page explaining MOS:ACCESS and colour contrast rules, requesting a discussion. No such discussion has taken place, only reverts. Feel free to lock the article until consensus is reached on what colours to use. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I warned the editor again; report them if they continue. This isn't a serious content dispute warranting full protection; it's simple disruptive editing. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock ( talk) 12:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 12:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 17:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC) 17:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 03:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. agtx 20:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 03:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Numerous Vodafone UK IPs disruptively editing material against WP:BLP Gricehead ( talk) 09:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 10:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Whoops. ~ Rob13 Talk 10:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has become one of the favourite targets for LTA vandal to fiddle with including changes to year of birth etc. SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 12:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possibly till after the film's release October 28. . Nairspecht ( talk) 08:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 10:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: After a series of vandals by an IP editor were undone by me. Kailash29792 ( talk) 10:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ Rob13 Talk 10:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 20:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

More one editor, Orchomen, refusing to stop reverting several different editors, including myself. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 20:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply
As Orchomen is now blocked for 2 days, I will withdraw this request. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 21:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn by requestor For the bot. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after a match, will subside soon hopefully. Sounder Bruce 00:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Valid request at the time, but now stale. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of disruptive editing by IP. Same person, same behavior, that resulted in previous page protection DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 07:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Same behavior from same IP-hopping editor as in Emma Morano (above). DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 07:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism. Protection log says that the article is prone to vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected ~ Rob13 Talk 06:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite protection: Blocked user talk. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see one obvious socking IP. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruption has to be fairly persistent and severe to semi-protect a user talk page. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip jumper with a LONG history disruptive unsourced info continues to disrupt this page . Digifan23 ( talk) 17:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New and IP users keep trying to add a section that is not WP:NPOV and is like advertising. -- Dane2007 talk 19:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal returned after protection lifted. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, for some reason. 97.90.234.216 ( talk) 23:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Long-term abuse. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 06:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Long-term abuse. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 06:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. I think a few month protection is in order for this article due to subject visibility. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs to evade block. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet ( talk) 23:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Page is has been constantly vandalized over the course of several months by an anonymous user utilizing different IPs or a morphing IP who constantly inserts personal opinions into the article.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 04:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MRD2014 ( talkcontribs) 01:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – disruption by User:Cebr1979. Sro23 ( talk) 03:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen using multiple IPs. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 04:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 04:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

18 October 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 18:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 19:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 20:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Bring back Daz Sampson ( talk) 20:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht ( talk) 16:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 19:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism by IP who is socking to continue his ADDITION OF HOAX BULLSHIT VANDALISM over a sustained period of time. 173.225.249.194 ( talk) 18:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Enigma msg 19:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism following some Twitter stuff. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 19:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 19:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, block evasion by dog/rap vandal. 2601:188:1:AEA0:B41D:261D:9855:3B48 ( talk) 12:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 18:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of AfD template after protection expired [11]. Jbh Talk 12:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 19:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's killing it in the MLB postseason, which is going to continue for a couple more weeks. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 18:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Enigma msg 19:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection and/or pending changes protection: Trolling troll. Article has been protected before. Another article they were targeting was protected earlier today. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 10:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:C849:59CD:AEDB:707F ( talk) 12:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive IP vandalism. Entranced98 ( talk) 14:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 15:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KDS4444 ( talk) 16:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. As per rationale similar to Elephant. Airplaneman 16:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create Protection: Vandal recreating a blatant promotion page with in 20 minutes of it being deleted. -- Dane2007 talk 15:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected – Already salted by User:DGG. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
there's only 1 op, and its create protected. I don't see the need to protect anything else in connection with it. DGG ( talk ) 23:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Creation protected (for the bot) Katie talk 14:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued violation of {{ Infobox television}} and MOS:TV. livelikemusic talk! 00:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – At least till the time of its release. Nairspecht ( talk) 08:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism because many users write wrong informations in this article. It must be semi-protected so that only confirmed users could edit only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by International Editor Shah ( talkcontribs) 16:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC) [unsigned because included in comment when submitted] reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 49.148.181.69 and 41.54.66.207 and Infrared Phantom. Eric S.V. ( talk) 18:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jane22 20:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: POV pushing by persistent sock and IPs. Refuses to discuss in talk. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~ Rob13 Talk 08:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Now semiprotected one week due to sockpuppetry by User:Ian.thomson. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Cahk ( talk) 07:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page still getting regular vandalism, may be worth protecting again?. Paste Let’s have a chat. 08:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Article has a previous history of IP vandalism. It appears to have begun again, from several IP addresses, possibly from the same user.. HandsomeFella ( talk) 09:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ever since the 'Ephixa' wiki page has been created, multiple users have vandalised the page by adding false statements and replace true statements with false as a joke. An example of this is when a user added 'Meme Streamer' to Ephixa's occupations and also added "Ephixa is also working on a Flight VIP" to Ephixa's page as an inside joke amongst Ephixa's fanbase. Micro 00:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC) : Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term although relatively infrequent pattern of new user/IP vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption from IP-hopping LTA IP (the "Best-Known-As" IP) for the past 10 weeks. Softlavender ( talk) 06:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More of the usual. Grayfell ( talk) 06:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and bitter edit warring. This includes adding rumors without a source. Crboyer ( talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism from IPs . K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 03:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect article and accompanying talk page until after November 8, 2016 as subject of article keeps making WP:COI edits. Ymblanter has previously advised subject on processes for Wikipedia. -- Dane2007 talk 03:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple sources. This has been indef protected before, but it was backed down to PC. That isn't working. agtx 03:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on GDP figures, presumably from multiple socks of blocked 72.204.45.235 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). David Biddulph ( talk) 03:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Both IP and new user keep attempting to remove images. -- Dane2007 talk 20:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Longtime IP troll. Protecting this page will force them to move to another page. The troll has been trolling in this particular way for a few months, but they also harass admins, spam the undo button, spam talk pages, and create impersonation accounts. Their trolling has resulted in several pages being protected, a few ANI sections, and a few blocks for some of the IPs they have used. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 20:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 22:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I follow all articles in the series of Visa requirements and Visa policy so sometimes I don't even realize that a certain article is under heavier attack than others. Now I've looked a bit into this and realized this article in particular is under heavy IP vandalism in recent weeks, mostly doing one and the same thing - skewing the data in the article lead. I suggest protecting the article from edits made by IP users for a month or so. Twofortnights ( talk) 22:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism for the last several days. Gnome de plume ( talk) 00:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding unsourced and original researched characters list. Hops IP to ignore warnings. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 00:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of IP namecruft today and yesterday. John from Idegon ( talk) 00:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been recent target of IP vandals. — IB [ Poke ] 16:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear ( talk) 17:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion and sock puppetry by User:Orchomen. Long-term abuse. Protection probably justified per comments by Rob. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 18:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple additions of new game coming out with no sources/improperly sourced. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerous editors have been claiming that the US is at DEFCON 3 following a post by an independent blog called the Defcon Warning System that suggested that US-Russia tensions over the Syrian Civil War have caused this change. The page has gone through several edits and reverts in the past week. This blog's claims are not related to the government's DEFCON status and this page should be temporarily semi-protected to prevent the dissemination of misinformation. TritonsRising (talk) 19:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IP's. This has been going on for a couple of months now (since around August) and needs to stop. Class455 ( talk) 20:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced material to television article by repeated IP address. livelikemusic talk! 02:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP and user vandalism. -- 1bcdbackup ( talk) 16:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 23:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Permanent semi-protection: IP editors and socks persist in adding COPYVIO content copy/pasted from company's website. Jytdog ( talk) 18:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined It's being edited about once a month. I took care of the RD1 revdel. Katie talk 23:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, block evasion by dog/rap vandal. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. There are multiple individual IP blocks here, but I blocked the /64 for 72 hours. Katie talk 23:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Repeated Rumors inserted

Temporary semi-protection: All four suffer from an ip (hopping across ips) repeately inserting a rumored furture show in 2017 that has not been confirmed or corroborated in any way. I have posted repeated requests to provide sources to no avail. One of those is a template that is transcluded on a lot of pages. I am hoping a temporary semi-protection will help clarify that the IP action is wrong and only try to add information with sources in the futurue.  MPJ -DK  20:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 2600:8800:448C:600::/64 blocked 48 hours. Katie talk 23:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13( talk) 22:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP and new user vandalism in the past week. Blue Adventure ( talk) 23:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP and user vandalism. -- 1bcdbackup ( talk) 16:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - Mr X 16:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles ( talk) 17:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected – 3 days by User:Courcelles in a later action. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Orchomen. Long-term abuse. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 18:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Justified for protection now. Long-term abuse. Persistent block evasion and sock puppetry by User:Orchomen. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 18:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 4 days by User:BU Rob13. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm seeing non-constructive edits from anons and IPs, including unsourced content and vandalism. I think temporary PC protection would work well. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Page being vandalised due to subject's criticism of recently deceased king of Thailand. -- haminoon ( talk) 23:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 23:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced/poorly sourced changes. Jetstreamer  Talk 13:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done – 3 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 13:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 68.149.156.88 ( talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Deor ( talk) 17:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits from unregistered users. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 14:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – Indefinite, due to very-long-term vandalism. See the protection log. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

19 October 2016

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs (and now a new "user" as well) - DVdm ( talk) 10:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an anon editor, claiming to be the articles subject, has on several occasions removed a sourced claim (that he's openly gay) saying that it is false and bullying. TacfuJecan ( talk) 11:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Regardless of who the IP is, they were right to remove that statement. The sourcing isn't adequate for such a statement as per WP:BLP. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Peacock ( talk) 15:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr ( talk) 15:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from 3 IP adresses during the past 4 or so hours. lovkal ( talk) 12:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ⁓ Hello 71 12:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. There was disruption even before the template was removed today. DVdm ( talk) 12:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's been so little time that it's hard to judge whether pending will be appropriate here. Let's try it. Ping me if the volume is too high or vandalism too frequent and I'll semi-protect instead. ~ Rob13 Talk 13:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 02:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It came off protection on 13 and has been edit once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 03:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple users keep deleting this page for different reasons without request for improvement. jane22 08:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Should also RPP Chaitan Deep (Chose this spelling as the other currently has a page right now). Wgolf ( talk) 02:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... Airplaneman 09:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This player has agreed to a trade which will not be finalised until tomorrow [12]. An in-principle agreement has been made between the two clubs which has led to disruptive editing on the page, can we please have 24 hour semi protection on this page until the trade is official. Flickerd ( talk) 07:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 08:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. LocalNet ( talk) 07:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 09:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Different IPs (possibly same editor), are making unsourced changes to the casualty figures in the infobox that are contrary to the cited sources. He's been constantly reverted by me and several other editors, and we asked that he provide sources, but he hasn't made any replies and continues to make the unsourced changes. The same actions of the same editor already led to the temporary semi-protection of two other articles Kurdish–Turkish conflict 2015-present and Turkish military intervention in Syria. EkoGraf ( talk) 01:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined I see a lot of editing but little back and forth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – lots of new or anonymous editors trying to shoehorn in a video of questionable provenance with dubious sourcing. clpo13( talk) 06:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This player has agreed to a trade which will not be finalised until tomorrow [13]. An in-principle agreement has been made between the two clubs which has led to a lot of disruptive editing on the page, can we please have 24 hour semi protection on this page until the trade is official. Flickerd ( talk) 06:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 01:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Or at least for the next six months to a year. Please SALT after deleting. Repeatedly recreated after the page was deleted via deletion discussions. Lourdes 03:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued attempts by multiple IPs to add unsourced content, after being protected for the two preceding days. — MelbourneStar talk 05:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 05:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: The character section of this article is frequently being vandalised with redundant information and uncessacary edits.

Zucat ( Talk) 22:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Full-protection: High level of vandalism (Edit War), because people are mad she did not win the latest season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars. Page should be fully protected until a month, at least, after the reunion of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars, then moved to semi-protection or regular protection for a page of a living person. Travis H. O. ( talk) 23:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined. Protection just expired at 16:32. Wait until it resumes. If it does post at my talk page. I should be around. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP range. VQuakr ( talk) 02:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Hopper keeps reverting to a version which tries to bring slant the article into saying the dish was developed in Malaysia, when his own reverts[ [14]] [ [15]] [ [16]] [ [17]] [ [18]] [ [19]] includes a source that on the the very 2nd sentence writes "a man named Lee Boon Teh brought bak kut teh to Klang from Fujian, China in the 40s." I and another editor have warned him about this multiple times and even edited to address some of his/her concerns, but this isn't helping. I created a topic on the Talkpage saying I would request page protection if the reverts continue, but he has since made 2 reverts even though one of them was made in part to address his concerns of "pro-singapore" bias. . Zhanzhao ( talk) 02:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of Unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 00:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 02:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 01:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war has been ongoing over the past 24 hours. CUA 27 ( talk) 01:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: -- rapid edit war. Staszek Lem ( talk) 22:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 01:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Soap opera and character articles

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Block evasion by a disruptive IP editor. Likely Cebr1979 ( talk · contribs) based on behavior and use of edit summaries. clpo13( talk) 23:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism for past several days from an anonymous editor who is using different IP addresses. --  StarScream1007   ►Talk  20:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Keri ( talk) 21:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Vandalism from long-term abuser. Binksternet ( talk) 22:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism by multiple registered users. MPD ( Talk to me!) 12:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Enigma msg 19:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing –By new user, totally unsourced edits to high profile page. Sodacan ( talk) 15:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Take it to the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent addition of non-notable cases. (See talk page notice for IP address). -- GouramiWatcher Talk 20:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Persistent unsourced changes to relationship status. clpo13( talk) 22:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Redrose64 for one week. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 23:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Enigma msg 19:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. – Michael ( talk) 18:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma msg 19:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper pushing a pov (and now adding red links to see also). They've just deleted part of a quote from a peer reviewed publication with the edit summary "Pseudoscience speculation at best. Population displacement is indicated and Datwins theory of evolution is brought into question. Modern leucodermic Eurasians including so called ancient Mongoloid Siberian populations are linked to the expansion of the. " [20] Maybe a week?. Doug Weller talk 18:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Doug Weller: I appreciate your request for an uninvolved opinion. I've double-checked the Chatters source and agree that it's not anywhere close to pseudoscience. The pdf link currently given to the source is, however, broken, at least for me (though the doi link at the end of the ref works just fine). Cheers, Airplaneman 20:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism continued immidiately after previous protection expired. Lizard ( talk) 21:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

20 October 2016

Temporary Semi-protection: High and a rising level of vandalism by IP and brand new accounts. 12 instances in recent days, reverted by 6 editors. The article is also seeing rising traffic, which may be because this annual festival is sometime next week. Requesting semi protection through November 5. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 12:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a recent vandal target. 331dot ( talk) 13:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. McGeddon ( talk) 13:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 20:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Speedy Delete (A7, G5, G11) and Creation Protection: Recreation of RichBoi Streeter, speedied for A3, A7 and G11, and has also been salted. Article created by sockmaster Dtreeter15 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dtreeter15/Archive Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 05:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 20:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi Protection persistent addition of unsourced content and edit warring (not providing a exact date per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT). 97.85.118.142 ( talk) 07:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi Protection persistent addition of unsourced content and edit warring (not providing a exact date per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT). 97.85.118.142 ( talk) 07:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi Protection persistent addition of unsourced content and edit warring (not providing a exact date per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT). 97.85.118.142 ( talk) 07:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht ( talk) 08:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High time now. Nairspecht ( talk) 10:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Indefinitely banned user ThomasPark02 (see block log here) is using various IP addresses to continually re-add a lower quality picture he has taken into the article. Ebonelm ( talk) 12:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing of a newbie. Mjbmr ( talk) 09:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined I have warned the user on their talk page. I actually believe that the editor is probably correct that the article's subject isn't notable; however, as the PROD is contested it should be sent to AfD if the user still wishes to delete it. At this stage I don't think it should be protected as the policy does not appear to have been explained to the user before. I will watch the article for a while and if the edit war continues will consider further action. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
AustralianRupert I have the problem with user adding "Although this was not actually true" which is not provable, other parts I've added are actually in the news, please check the references. We don't add what we believe it's true or not, we rely on notable references. If you don't believe the article is notable delete it, this was inspirational. Mjbmr ( talk) 12:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 17:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Resumption of BLP attack after end of previous protection. Appears to be one user on a fairly narrow IP range. Meters ( talk) 18:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Has been in the news a lot for the last few weeks. Everymorning (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I decided to try out extended confirmed since that was what you originally said, even though you later amended it. :P Enigma msg 22:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Enigmaman: I was under the impression that the recent RfC allows the use of EC protection where semi-protection has proven inadequate, which does not appear to be the case here. Am I missing something? Regards, Vanamonde ( talk) 04:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Enigma msg 01:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Often vandalized due to being the same name as the superhero. Evking22 ( talk) 15:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs and accounts readding same content over and over. SLBedit ( talk) 18:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined. One edit since protection expired on 7 September. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – there is a user currently deleting this page continuously when the contents have been properly sourced and the same meets encyclopedic content. this article has a large readership and audience from the east africa region who a certain user repeatedly keeps vandalizing it. jane22 01:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined This is not vandalism. Somebody has nominated this article for deletion. If you have policy-based objections, express them at that discussion. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Johnlyh77 ( talk) 03:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma msg 04:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dewritech ( talk) 14:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Enigma msg 01:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent & persistent vandalism from multiple anons, putting the wrong person's name into article as a member of the cast. Shearonink ( talk) 05:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Reoccurring unexplained deletion of content by anon user(s). VA6DK ( talk) 05:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP addresses . K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma msg 01:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. George Ho ( talk) 02:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Vanamonde93 looks like we both got that at the same time. So it goes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ CambridgeBayWeather: Hah yes, it would seem so. I've noticed I don't get "edit-conflict" notices for protection, I wonder why...in any case, no harm done. Cheers, Vanamonde ( talk) 05:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Vanamonde93. It's strange and it has happened before. I'll go and ask at WP:VP/T. And thanks for doing the one above this. I was one of the people who deleted it and didn't want to answer the protection request. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism done by several different IPs. Jacce ( talk) 04:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected I'd rather not lock out IPs altogether, but disruption clearly resumes each time protection expires. So let's give indefinite PC a shot, and if disruption is too frequent, it can be converted to semi-protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Editwarring reported on WP:COIN. Brianhe ( talk) 04:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit-warring amongst experienced users: semi-protection is no good here. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks, I cut and pasted the semi protection request without thinking that through. - Brianhe ( talk) 05:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism due to tonight's debate. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent lP vandalism. Muzammil ( talk) 02:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme vandalism to page, done by IP's and anonymous editors, by adding unsourced or poorly sourced content that also violates MOS:TV and {{ Infobox television}}. livelikemusic talk! 15:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.   I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 15:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 17:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. One person is hopping around on IPs in an effort to insert an unsourced, apparently false (as of now) claim. RunnyAmigatalk 21:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Appears too much editing for PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Same kind of disruptive, BLP policy violating, edits which led to the previous semi-protection in September are happening again. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 23:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 03:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 04:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated at this title and also GoGoVan. Citobun ( talk) 03:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 03:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 21:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Enigma msg 22:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrcitizenx. Spamming info on J Barry Grenga and Slow Dancin' Down The Aisles Of The Quickcheck [21] [22] . Jbh Talk 22:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 01:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks. I just saw that the request was for ex-confirm, I must have messed up in TW. Semi was all I intended. I think it was semi'd by Bbb23 for a week earlier in the day. Jbh Talk 01:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from red letter editors today. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Enigma msg 22:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. LaimWMcKenzie ( talk) 18:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 01:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP and SPA vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 18:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 01:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and anon vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 01:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations, persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma msg 01:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 01:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Article should already have this protection. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 13:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Article should already have this protection. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 13:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Article should already have this protection. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 13:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Article should already have this protection. BLP targeted by Special:Contributions/AndresHerutJaim IP sock and NoCal100 sock. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13 Talk 13:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined I am not sure why you keep reverting legitimate edits. They are certainly not vandalism. Enigma msg 22:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Enigmaman: Then I suggest you take a closer look. There is a lot of incorrect numbers being added, and a lot of editors saying "oh he scored three tonight, I can add them". After 5 editors has done the same, suddenly the same footballer has 15 extra goals. Qed237  (talk) 22:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected Indefinite. Enigma msg 23:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current target of MariaJaydHicky. SummerPhD v2.0 13:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current target of MariaJaydHicky. . SummerPhD v2.0 13:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and high risk of targeting due to the controversial nature of the topic.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Article should already have this protection. BLP frequently targeted by Special:Contributions/AndresHerutJaim IP socks and other editors who do not meet the 30/500 requirements. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Katie talk 12:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by admitted IP hopper ( [25]). The same editor has been leaving misleading warning notices: [26]. clpo13( talk) 15:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: The IP hopper is also impersonating me and another user ( [27], [28]). Dark Knight 2149 17:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – No sources say he and his wife were estranged. IP keeps readding it. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 15:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Brianga ( talk) 16:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

21 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Long term disruption; vandalism, promotional edits and copyright violations by series of accounts going back several months. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 08:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Marcus Stanley is already salted. Can we salt this one as well?. agtx 15:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 21:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A few hours after the previous protection was lifted, the IP hopping BLP vandal returned. :-(. bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Blind reverts. No edit-summaries. Told them to go to the talk page. They don't listen. It's the same in other articles as well, such as: Guba Genocide Memorial Complex, Bruce Fein, and etc. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 17:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editor. Karst ( talk) 14:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 15:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 15:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Permanent semi-protection: I had previously asked for permanent PP as IP editors and socks persist in adding COPYVIO content copy/pasted from company's website; this was declined by User:KrakatoaKatie in this dif. They came back again and again added copyvio content that needs to be removed and then again revdelled by someone. Entirely predictable and a waste of everyone's time involved, including mine in reposting this and tracking down what happened to the last request. I am unwatching the article. To hell with this. Jytdog ( talk) 15:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At the time I didn't feel protection was justified; now I do, but I'm not going to indef lock an article that's never been protected before. I also took care of the RD1. Katie talk 16:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today he talked out a bill that would have pardoned gay men convicted of consensual sexual activity when it was illegal. The article has been repeated vandalised this evening, and this will likely continue for a couple of days as it will still be news. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 18:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of the weekend, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Plus 1 week PC protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Troll. Robert McClenon ( talk) 13:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Unsourced/poorly sourced additions are being added to the article daily, mostly by IP editors. JuneGloom07 Talk 14:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Recent persistent vandalism by a bunch of IPs DVdm ( talk) 14:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user. GXXF TC 20:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ GXXF: Can you clarify? I don't see that they've edited their talk page since being blocked. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs change number of goals . Mascarponette ( talk) 08:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced info re release date and cast. Nordic Nightfury 11:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 205.222.248.194. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit-warring by multiple parties. Alex|The|Whovian ? 08:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced name variants for the topic. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 09:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 10:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

fully protected: edit warring. Federal Chancellor (NightShadow) ( talk) 09:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent spamming. My Chemistry romantic ( talk) 10:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or indefinite pending changes protection. This article has been semi-protected before and predictably, an IP-hopping vandal has arrived after the protection's expiration to insert the same WP:ADVOCACY stuff they've been pushing for months and blatantly lying about the edit's content in their summary. RunnyAmigatalk 17:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 18:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: BLP violations, had to stubbify. Office Protection ({{ pp-reset}}) requested. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 19:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ KATMAKROFAN: Only WMF staff can office-protect a page. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I thought a staffer would respond. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 20:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
This page is more for requesting admins protect pages. You'll want to contact one of the people listed as being able to initiate office actions listed at the page I linked. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@Ks0stm: Will it be possible to at least semi-protect the article at the moment? Thomson200 ( talk) 22:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 monthss, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Page was protected because of negative statements re: the subjects gender. IPs have vandalized the page since then twice with similar claims [29] [30] [31]. Today an IP also requested an original research defamatory claim based on primary sources from Wikileaks that could not be found in news media or other reliable sources [32]. Requesting page protection until the election is over. TonyBallioni ( talk) 22:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption from IPs based in the Philipines where this church is based. Please consider long term or permanent. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 14:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incoming high traffic from trailer, trying to prevent vandalism. Jdcomix ( talk) 15:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Good amount of IP vandalism over days. IPs moved on to vandalise User pages as well. Kyo~ ( talk) 01:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only one IP being truly disruptive here. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheErectile ( talk) 03:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 04:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Oshwah.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. TheErectile ( talk) 03:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 04:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Oshwah.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 04:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elvey( tc) 09:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. MusikAnimal talk 20:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
OK. And the IP-hopping sockpuppetry? I see notes on this page indicate you respond by issuing blocks sometimes.-- Elvey( tc) 23:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from different IPs. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 02:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma msg 03:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Max & Ruby

Both of these pages are semi protected. Now that Max & Ruby is now airing new episodes on Nick again, move it to current series rather than former. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.85.118.142 ( talkcontribs) 07:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done Request this on the article/template's talk page by following the instructions above. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term pattern of almost continuous, albeit sporadic, vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 22:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Pretty much all of the last 4 dozen edits over the past month are vandalism from IPs/SPAs or people having to deal with said vandalism. Reil ( talk) 23:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 01:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht ( talk) 08:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN ( talk) 21:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 10:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN ( talk) 21:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: recurring non-policy based removal of sourced content by anon editor(s) amounting to edit warring. - Brianhe ( talk) 23:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This page has been continually subject to vandalism and disruptive editing, even while under pending changes protection as it is currently. Funcrunch ( talk) 14:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Agreed there is a good amount of regular disruption, but this is invisible to the vast majority of readers, and good edits by unconfirmed users are occasionally being accepted. I think PC will suffice MusikAnimal talk 20:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
For the record, I counted only three accepted edits by unconfirmed users over the last three months. And while the general public isn't exposed to this vandalism, trans and non-binary editors like myself are. I explained the harm this can cause in a talk at the recent WikiConference. Funcrunch ( talk) 21:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism due to APSCUF/PASSHE teachers strike. Esw01407 ( talk) 22:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Ponyo. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP harassment. clpo13( talk) 22:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Paul Erik. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs adding unsourced content about upcoming releases. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; WP:BLP violations with spurious sourcing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 ( talk) 01:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP has been adding content to this article using existing reference tags that does not support the content they are adding. I have removed the content, and add some back that was correct with a proper tag, and the IP is consistently reverting these correct changes. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 01:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Both considering the eventful history of the page where in users are creating accounts just to vandalize the page and the history of protection, this one requires protection. Nairspecht ( talk) 08:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Pending-changes protection doing its job. Edit rate is not too high, and there are good edits by anons being accepted MusikAnimal talk 20:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of repeated vandalism of a single new user. Tired of rollback, does not care about warning. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 13:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 20:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks back to disruptive edits as soon as the last protection expired. SMS Talk 14:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Editing infrequent. Existing pending-changes protection seems appropriate MusikAnimal talk 20:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Primary disruptive user has been blocked, and things otherwise seem to have cooled off MusikAnimal talk 20:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Major product announcement today revealed details for new Nintendo console. Article seeing heavy traffic with over 10 vandalism edits in as many minutes. -- ferret ( talk) 14:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi - Coordinated vandalism. TimothyJosephWood 17:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. Whenever I see La Salle at the pending changes list, I know before I click "review" that I'm about to revert vandalism. Pending changes protection is supposed to be for articles that get a mix of both good and bad edits from new and/or anonymous users, and La Salle doesn't qualify. Since June, there has been precisely one change to the text by such an editor that was retained, and it was this take-it-or-leave-it bit that's since been undone. If no pending edits are ever accepted, it's a waste of our time having to manually revert edits that semi-protection would prevent. RunnyAmigatalk 18:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. As stated above, PC1 was not accomplishing anything. Previous semi-protection was as lengthy as a year. With only one good-faith edit since June, and years of reverted vandalism and otherwise disruptive edits, indefinite seemed justified. — Maile ( talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

22 October 2016

Full protection: I would like to have my talk page be fully protected as I intend to "retire" from editing at Wikipedia. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 14:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done We don't do this, and certainly not just because you're unhappy at receiving a warning. If you're retiring, why do you even care what messages are posted to your talkpage? ‑  Iridescent 17:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: I would like to have my user page be fully protected as I intend to "retire" from editing at Wikipedia. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 14:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done See above. This is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, not the encyclopedia only people you authorise can edit. ‑  Iridescent 17:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: From Wikimedia Foundation. GXXF TC 17:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done Most recent vandalism I can see was from August. No reason given for requesting protection (if you're claiming to be requesting it on behalf of the WMF, knock that off right now unless you're a WMF employee). ‑  Iridescent 17:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: I want to create it. GXXF TC 17:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done We're not going to allow you to create a userpage for an unregistered user, which is just plain disruptive. If you want to change your username, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Changing username, but I think it's unlikely you'll be allowed to call yourself User:User given the potential for confusion. ‑  Iridescent 17:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 10:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Indefinitely banned user ThomasPark02 (see block log here) and now is sockpuppet Thomas D. Park (see block log here) has been using various IP addresses to continually re-add a lower quality picture he has taken into the article. The same prollem has also been happening at The Cenotaph (Hong Kong) which has already been placed under auto-confirmed semi-protection and it would be great if the time period for that article could also be extended. Ebonelm ( talk) 14:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor ( talk) 20:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. After I gave a final warning to a vandal, they hopped to a different IP to reinsert their bad edit. RunnyAmigatalk 19:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the article was on pending changes, there's no reason for editors to have to keep dealing with (i.e., rejecting) these "GEE-ja" edit attempts. Deor ( talk) 20:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile ( talk) 20:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: No such thing happened why this user is blocked. Vexillographer ( talk) 23:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Really can't see any discernable reason why it needs to be unprotected (or the user even unblocked). tutterMouse ( talk) 05:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ LG-Gunther: We need more information. Which sockmaster? ~ Rob13 Talk 14:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: It is an autobio which is repeatedly being created by subject and his socks. Jaishankar Chigurula has been speedied (a7) seven times as of now. Recently, Jaishankar Chigurula (Director) was deleted. Here, one sock mentioned that they will create the article again and again and it will, never stop. Thank you! Anup [Talk] 19:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator CactusWriter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Zapacit 22:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeking page protection Multiple reverted edits by varying IP editors over the last 1-2 months. Tom (LT) ( talk) 23:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Back and forth blanking/un-blanking due to perceived or real BLP issues. I am not taking sides as to which party is correct, but clearly a calming period is needed while the underlying issue is sorted out. Safiel ( talk) 06:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing restarted due no protection, it is the same sock-puppetry by User:PavelStaykov. Crovata ( talk) 10:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible template redirect. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 21:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to blank the page by IPs. As this is a completed AFD, there will never be need for IPs to be editing it. Nat Gertler ( talk) 00:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – "OMG DANK MEEMZ IM SO KEWLY!!1", introduction of factual inaccuracies, and a bunch of oversighted revisions that (judging from the edit summaries) contain the Bee Movie script. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 00:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Article has a long history of BLP violations and disruptive editing, according to page logs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. HENDAWG229 ( talk) 03:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has become a target of IP editors who keep inserting unsourced songs into the tracklist. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 04:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Amatulic. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Troll. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 06:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recent vandalism by multiple anons. Shearonink ( talk) 19:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Not much constructive editing from IP's since the pending changes came into effect, possibly recent IP hoping. Adog104 Talk to me 22:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Deletions are obviously from Republican Party trolls. They were told to go to the Talk page. They do not listen. Requesting full protection through Election Day November 8th 2016 at minimum. Camairaen ( talk) 22:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter ( talk) 08:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple sources. agtx 04:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SnapMcCrackle ( talk) 02:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert ( talk) 06:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I remember this article being protected a week or so ago. Right after unprotection, IPs removing AfD templates and general disruptive editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Oshwah for 7 days. tutterMouse ( talk) 05:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple VOAs and general vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Oshwah for 2 weeks. tutterMouse ( talk) 05:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Disruptive socking resumed as soon as the previous protection expired. Throwaway accounts are used so blocks are not effective. Meters ( talk) 03:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected by Acroterion for 10 days. tutterMouse ( talk) 05:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopping/Vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 17:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping vandal has been attacking page, may need to have protection for a bit to slow them down. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Southern Italy ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection. Persistent IP vandalism. Kansas Bear ( talk) 18:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

23 October 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Or maybe the page could simply be deleted and created from being protected. That would work too. Sro23 ( talk) 12:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Materialscientist ( talk) 12:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/unhelpful edits. New season is premiering tonight and is always swarmed with IP vandalism when a new season premieres. Drovethrughosts ( talk) 14:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and misinformation. Kbabej ( talk) 18:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 19:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 19:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3#General Prohibition. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing/Sock puppetry at this article. Currently Semiprotected however user continues to make contested edits and has used multiple accounts. -- Dane2007 talk 06:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Blocked as per your report at AN3. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content dispute about a BLP issue that has resulted in a large number of reverts. Mostly by anon IPs. Karst ( talk) 09:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB ( talk) 01:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent violations of BLP by anon users. Ntb613 ( talk) 06:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addtions that vio BLP. Dcheagletalkcontribs 07:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 ( talk) 01:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; persistent addition of unsourced and resume content, and WP:BLP violations by multiple accounts. Personal life content suggests COI. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A flurry of IP vandalism edits over the last day or so.   Aloha27  talk  02:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bearcat. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:53, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism due to 2016 National League Championship Series. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:54, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full-protection: Edit-warring over the "right" version of the article. I think a week will get people to the talk page to resolve the problem. Jack Sebastian ( talk) 03:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Editor refuses to acknowledge wikipedia guideline regarding reliable sources and has started throwing insults and acting generally immature. *Treker ( talk) 04:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations and possible conflict of interest/single purpose accounts in action.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 04:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has often been vandalized by anonymous users by adding misleading informations. Tiktomoro ( talk) 05:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own space. Jetstreamer  Talk 14:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by requestor CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – DAB keeps on getting reverted to a article. Wgolf ( talk) 23:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

As a note-the entire history of this DAB is crazy with pages linking to the same article also and users editing the pages-might want to look over a possible SPI. Wgolf ( talk) 23:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily fans putting useless commentary about their looks (and other trivial information). Every instance has been reverted, but it's getting tedious. Primefac ( talk) 23:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP had edit warred over their addition so I'd reported them to AN3 however since that report they've returned under a new IP just to insert the same crap, I've withdrawn the AN3 report as pointless now, Anyway thanks, . – Davey2010 Talk 02:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 2 months. Also reported at WP:AN3. EdJohnston ( talk) 05:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined One recreation isn't enough. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 19:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Disruptive, subjective and persistent editing committed by one or two IP addresses. They would habitually be removing content and their reliable sources. Meganesia ( talk) 20:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive-sock puppetry by User:PavelStaykov restarted after protection expiration. In 11 September it was protected for 1 month, it needs longer protection to prevent further edit-war. Crovata ( talk) 18:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The IP reverted the revision with the summary "Turkic retards shouldn't edit WP". The mention of the Turks and insulting the specific nationality is typical of the PavelStaykov socks, see the investigation archive. The IP needs to be blocked.-- Crovata ( talk) 18:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 monthss, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 19:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from blocked sock and dynamic IP. Qed237  (talk) 20:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary sem-protection. I'm not sure why this page, which is under attack from an IP hopper, was taken to WP:ANI rather than here. RunnyAmigatalk 21:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

24 October 2016

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Oath2order, I can not find any discussions at the talk page, not after 2012. Could you please point us out to some relevant discussions?-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race, Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 5), Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race: All Stars (season 2) , User talk:68.190.153.14. Oath2order (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: A wide variety of IPs keep editing the page reverting it back to a style that User:CCamp2013 and I determined did not violate W:OR. The IPs disagree, and has led to numerous debates on talk pages regarding a variety of IPs, CCamp, myself, and a few other users. The IP spamming edit is unlikely to stop due to the edits being addressed offsite. I request that this page gets temporarily protected until the IPs move on. Oath2order (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring IP vandalism over the past few days. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Consistent vandalism since last protection period expired MusikAnimal talk 19:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — MBlaze Lightning T 14:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Baby miss fortune 08:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (blanking) and disruptive editing (making sweeping POV changes with no prior discussion) by an IP-hopper in Karachi, Pakistan (see page history). - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 12:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing (making sweeping POV changes with no prior discussion) by the same IP-hopper in Karachi, Pakistan, who has made similar changes, and repeatedly vandalised (by blanking the article) University (see separate RFPP-request). - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 12:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 17:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Page has been getting vandalized by IP addresses.-- Tarun.joseph ( talk) 08:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from IP addresses . K.e.coffman ( talk) 10:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done The most recent IP vandal has been warned and appears to have stopped. Before that, there was one *good* edit by an IP and vandalism by a new account, that has since been blocked. I don't think any kind of protection is necessary at the moment. Yaris678 ( talk) 12:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 11:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done – Indefinite. EdJohnston ( talk) 16:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: edit war going on. 107.77.215.190 ( talk) 01:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Reporting user has already volaited 3RR rule. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 02:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
oh, "I" never violated the 3rr. You were the 1 who kept reverting me 107.77.215.190 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ BU Rob13: Already reported, see link above. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 02:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked., article semi'd. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 05:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Repeated "hacked by..." Jim1138 ( talk) 04:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Magee (a dab page) and Magee College could use semi-protection for a few days - consistent IP changing Derry to Londonderry against WP:DERRY. Tried and failed to engage the IP in productive editing. Follows a spate of similar changes earlier in the year. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 12:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 ( talk) 12:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. Has been under attack for a few days by a single person hopping around IPs, trying to add unsourced, unconfirmed information about future installments of this show. Although a rangeblock for a week or two would mean we wouldn't need to remove its pending protection status; all the problematic identities' IPs start with 2604:2000:98c4:8c00. RunnyAmigatalk 23:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 ( talk) 00:51, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP removing BLPPROD

  • IPv6 rm BLPPROD [33]
  • 172.56 rm BLPPROD [34]
  • 172.56 rm BLPPROD [35]

Likely SOCKS of You're the Reason Why I Sing who did the same [36]. Jbh Talk 00:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Re-report if the disruption resumes. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet ( talk) 03:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)" reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring, primarily by one user against consensus. BilCat ( talk) 19:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by IP addresses . K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of information that violates {{ Infobox television}} and MOS:TV by sock-hopping IP and anonymous user. livelikemusic talk! 02:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 02:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Recent dynamic IP trolling in the form of tagbombing-not heavy but persistent-please note this article went through a lot of wrestling in 2007 as we were all aware of potential POV concerns and the wording as is was agreed opon between various factions. Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 12:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Twice sinc February is not a major problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A recent change by a user Grayfell deleted content from the page on the awards and recoginition section citing the need to provide independent and reliable sources. This is not true as the awards listed on this sections are publicly available and can be found in a quick google search of the same including the relevant sites of forbes and business insider. An anonymous Ip also previously edited the page to state that the subject has a twin sister with no citations or proof of any kind. Another anonymous Ip user also changed the description of the subject from kenyan to kenyan-born thereby reflecting a different message to readers without any reason or citation of any kind at all. This page needs protection to prevent issues like this from reoccuring. These issues have been reoccuring over months and are continous. jane22 18:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 21:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I think it's time to set this page due to constant title warring, perm-semi would be perfect, but..... - Mlpearc ( open channel) 21:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consensus was reached that Timothy Leary should not be described as a philosopher in the lead, but an IP editor is repeatedly re-adding this description anyway. IP is sock of AcidRock67, who has edit warred incessantly on this issue in the past. Needs protection against repeat of same. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 16:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Semi-frequent vandalism from the same IP to misinform. Keeps on editing release date. RHM-kun ( talk) 17:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Could an admin check this out? There appears to be a slow-moving edit war on this article for the past few weeks, with an IP-hopping edit-warrer attempting to insert a comparison to Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park into the lede. Normal WP:3RR would not work because this bloke is on a dynamic, changing IP. The discussion is at Talk:Silicon Valley#Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park. The diffs of the IP-hopping edit-warrer are: [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] (the last diff completely reverted all editing I was trying to do on the lede) 10qwerty 19:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been constantly vandalized recently. I think it should be semi-protected for a day or two. SilverplateDelta ( talk) 19:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vanity edits by User:Sherazkhan302, now resorting to IP accounts. Cabayi ( talk) 10:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:54, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – also BLP content is anon IP truly connect to ALDUB Wedding shows will be disputed. Oripaypaykim (talk) 11:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Semi-frequent vandalism, occurs every few days. Joseph 2302 12:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disinformation. Coltsfan ( talk) 13:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: High level of IP and user vandalism as well as misinformation. Blurp92 ( talk) 14:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses (but very likely the same person) edit warring (content dispute). Multiple breaches of WP:3RR (if regarded as same editor). -- HighKing ++ 14:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Increased Semi-protection: Following advice of Ivanvector at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/194.30.139.109 request extension of semi protection to stem IP disruption of sock editor template. Disruption has occurred on both the article and its talk page, the latter most recently. - Brianhe ( talk) 15:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism/edit warring. I think the topic's controversial enough to warrant protection at this point. Mrpersonman0 ( talk) 20:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:02, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of disruption from IP addresses in relationship to Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations . K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 22:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi protection Persistent vandalism. Eagleash ( talk) 21:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

25 October 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring on the article of a U.S. Representative. Evking22 ( talk) 03:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. this should cover the election + a few days. DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full-protection: Repeatedly recreated by possible socks of User:Ianassaleem. Needs to be salted. -- SMS Talk 10:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 15:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Creation protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. no apparent need for indefinite DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated spam/copyvio article. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism by 207.62.111.153, 108.28.176.138 and 208.108.212.152. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DGG ( talk ) 19:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – A month I guess? Can't find anybody notable online by this name, and this guy has created his autobio three times today. Wikishovel ( talk) 10:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Trolling from several users regarding the same issues. Nordic Nightfury 12:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Nordic Nightfury: You mean, this? The fact that you have been called out on the same issue by multiple editors- including an Administrator? And all of whom you are now calling trolls? I think further administrative involvement is indeed required: but it won't be here. Muffled Pocketed 12:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
This seems child-like behavior from Nordic. Leaving a wake of mistakes across the Afd desk and having other editors clean up behind him. Anyway....this request for talk page protection is silly. Sorry. Lourdes 13:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Excuse me! That remark is just offensive. Two editors asked politely to review a small number, not all of my recent relists in AfD. I admit "trolls" was a rather strong word and I apologise for using the term, but I don't appreciate multiple users posting the same thing over and over. I think I'll just stick to reporting and delsorting for the future. Nordic Nightfury 13:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Obviously, this is not an appropriate situation for protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection (of some kind): High level of POINTY vandalism. For the past two months, an editor(s) has tenaciously added templates to the talk page, making bogus semi-protection requests etc.. In chronological order newest to oldest: [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] Green C 14:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Protecting a talk page is a last resort, and the disruptive edit requests aren't so frequent that this is necessary. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 17:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 19:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous semi-protection was nullified by the expiry of the full-protection in response to an edit war. Nickag989 talk 19:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Katie talk 19:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection, then indefinite pending changes protection. Yesterday, User:Ymblanter reacted to my RFPP report of the franchise's main article by semi-protecting it and rangeblocking the person responsible for the attacks. I failed to check the series' individual pages like I should have; they weren't on my radar because unlike the main article, they aren't pending-changes protected. Sure enough, each of these three articles has been seeing the same sort of crystal ball problems so they each ought to get the same week's semi-protection then the same indefinite PC1. (And that's assuming the protection applied in March 2014 by User:HJ Mitchell was indeed indefinite; it doesn't explicitly say that and I don't know anything so I can't tell for sure.) RunnyAmigatalk 14:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Ymblanter: Can you take a look at this? -- MelanieN ( talk) 18:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *Treker ( talk) 21:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 18:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP edit warring. WWGB ( talk) 22:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 18:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest of a series of socks having been blocked, now returning as an IP. -- Snowded TALK 23:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 18:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If semi-protection isn't justified, then having pending changes would be good enough. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 23:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After the previous one-month semi-protection expired, vandalism resumed immediately. MelanieN ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Derry vs. Londonderry flamewar. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 23:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing by IPs in the Formerly broadcast section of the page. -- TaffyM talk 13:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: After page protection was given, there have been no edits since march of this year. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ DMacks:: should we make it finite term?-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The only change since my setting PC1 has been someone trying to undo that protection (the March edit Iazges mentions). That's not a good edit. The article is only PC1 not semi, so nobody is actually inhibited, but also it seems that not even non-constructive editors (excepting the one I already mentioned) are interested in disrupting the article for now. I'll unprotect as an experiment. DMacks ( talk) 13:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Done. tutterMouse ( talk) 13:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Also, IP editors are making positive changes, so I'm also declining the request for semi-protection. This situation has no simple remedy. Samsara 10:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 75.162.218.233 ( talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Bordering on stale, but have given 48 hours to this vandalism-only IP. Samsara 10:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Only warning was after last edit, unblocked. Samsara 10:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Problematic edits by one IP only, not a case for protection or PC. Samsara 11:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; unsourced and promotional content for new article. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65B8:F59A:5E97:E329 ( talk) 04:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Problematic user has already been warned. Additionally, IPs are part of the clean-up, so semi would be self-injurious. Samsara 10:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of dynamic IP vandalism. Ariradha ( talk) 21:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism and nonconstructive edits. NikolaiHo ☎️ 03:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Of four recently reverted changes, two were marked as good faith and only the most recent could be considered seriously disruptive. Worth keeping an eye on, but not a current case for action. Samsara 09:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Some vandals and editors persistently trying to delete a valid of a Filipino actor with actual reference and links from the TV network. (GMA Network). leetphenom 05:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Declined It's an active AfD discussion. Please do not remove the template pointing to it - the discussion will take place regardless! Samsara 09:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai ( talk) 06:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like a single honest mistake by a new user. Samsara 09:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 22:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Still being targeted with unexplained blankings by IPs despite RC protection. 331dot ( talk) 11:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try doubling up for now, but PC may not be the solution if it flares up again after 10 days. Samsara 12:13, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Mr X 12:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There was some unreverted vandalism noticed by Bay Area media. . Arbor to SJ ( talk) 21:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator OlEnglish. Samsara 12:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 22:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hoppers remove and falsifies sourced content. Wario-Man ( talk) 11:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism starts up every time this page goes off protection. Permanent semi, please. Save editor and bot resources. Montanabw (talk) 22:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Fangusu. Sro23 ( talk) 23:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Just tried to make this request myself. We're aware that requesting semiprotection of a talk page is unconventional, but the same CBANned user has been spamming edit requests to this page for two weeks, and there have been no substantive edits to the talk page for five years prior. Please consider the request. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 23:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Block evasion. Samsara 11:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 10:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit abusive flagging and edit warring. 2A1ZA ( talk) 12:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The IP address 213.74.186.109 ( talk) is constantly, and for months now, putting up an obviously abusive flags on the Syrian Democratic Forces article and edit-warring to keep them up, apparently with the intent to taint the topic as such for readers, without offering any reasoning for the respective flags on the talk page, and sabotages the attempt to delete the abusive flags by edit-warring undoing. Does not answer any more on the talk page of the article, which by now has several sections for discussing exactly this problem by other users, but all pleading with 213.74.186.109 does not meke him/her to at least engage in discussion.

The issue was reported before, however the abusive behaviour of IP 213.74.186.109 did not change. cc Euryalus

Something administratively needs to be done, in my humble opinion. Either blocking that IP 213.74.186.109 or semi-protecting that page. -- 2A1ZA ( talk) 12:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked., for 48 h, to start with-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been subjected to persistent vandalism, much of which has not been detected in a timely manner, over a significant period of time. Therefore, protecting it for just a few days would not be especially helpful. Lepricavark ( talk) 01:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 09:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Donnowin1: looks like a lot of dispute over content and sourcing rather than outright vandalism - please make sure to give some explanation of your actions on the talk page. I'm semi-protecting partly in good faith here. Regards, Samsara 10:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined The chief disruptive user has been blocked: I don't see enough evidence of other disruption. Besides, there are a number of IPs making seemingly good faith contributions. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism - Someone changed all the references to "homeless" with "homosexual" twice already. Udibe ( talk) 08:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not yet a long-term pattern. Samsara 09:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. Scott Roy Atwood ( talk) 14:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN ( talk) 23:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated attempts by a single user (User:77LmTA6knQ6) and a number of IP accounts to remove/alter a very carefully worded (and consensus established) section about a scandal occuring in the College in 2015. Ebonelm ( talk) 16:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC) --> reply

Declined The main combatants in this content dispute are all autoconfirmed so semi-protection would not help. Consider dispute resolution. If consensus was established (I don't see an establishment of consensus at the talk page, just arguing between two users; but the reverts by multiple people suggest that there is a consensus), it would be helpful if the others would join the talk page conversation to make the consensus clear. If that happens, and the one user persists in not accepting the consensus, some kind of action report against them may be necessary. MelanieN ( talk) 23:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User's request within his own userspace. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 07:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected BethNaught ( talk) 07:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: The color scheme in this article is subject to an RFC on the talk page and it makes it extremely difficult to conduct it while an editor continually alters it. Full protection would be best until the RFC is concluded. Betty Logan ( talk) 12:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Seems to have settled down now. Katie talk 22:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection. Vexillographer ( talk) 19:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Any particular reason? ‑  Iridescent 19:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Creation protected I think that's what they meant to ask for. This has been repeatedly created and deleted. MelanieN ( talk) 00:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 00:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection. It's likely that Chick, a notorious religious figure, died yesterday although we're waiting on better sources. In the meanwhile, this semi-protected page is the site of an ongoing edit war. Users who are able to edit semi-protected pages are refusing to accept that the Facebook posting announcing his death isn't a reliable source. RunnyAmigatalk 20:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Although it might be a good idea to wait on this for a while; an ongoing discussion at Chick's talk might have revealed that the Facebook page is reliable. RunnyAmigatalk 20:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Multiple online sources confirm the death. Disruption seems to have subsided. Katie talk 22:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Promotional, unsourced and possibly copied content added by COI account. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65B8:F59A:5E97:E329 ( talk) 14:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 19:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Magnolia677 ( talk) 16:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 23:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 00:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: This film is about to release, and has seen some disruptive editing of late, including some additions of unsourced content. Should protection be awarded, a month protection would be great to get the article through its release, where an influx of disruptive editing regularly occurs. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Two weeks for now. If protection is needed after that, ask again. MelanieN ( talk) 00:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently deceased person. Many IP vandals. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 17:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator albert square.. MelanieN ( talk) 00:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Consist false information claiming school cooperated with a police investigation. School staff have and continue to receive personal threats based on this false information. Kmomkin ( talk) 04:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 19:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. Scott Roy Atwood ( talk) 14:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 23:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. This movie is a constant presence at pending changes with the same junk showing up over and over and over. There are attempts to remove a well-sourced claim that it stars Ali Zafar, attempts to change the name of the character played by Shah Rukh Khan, boilerplate edit summaries that don't have anything to do with their edits, and no substantial efforts anywhere to explain or discuss anything. It shows up so much at the PC list with terrible, unhelpful edits that for the first time that I can recall, pending patrolling has me in danger of violating WP:3RR. RunnyAmigatalk 15:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC is clearly inadequate to deal with the recent situation, and PC expires tomorrow in any case. MelanieN ( talk) 23:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 23:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 14:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 23:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. ip address 23.241.149.164 is constantly restoring large chunks of unsourced and bogus material. Have issued 3rd warning within 3 days. Content appears to be for promotional purposes Dralgos ( talk) 22:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN ( talk) 23:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already done. Katie talk 22:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be multiple new accounts vandalizing page. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Katie talk 22:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Widr. Katie talk 22:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Multi-vector ongoing edit war between IPs and single purpose accounts extending over days. Requesting semi-protection for a few days or even a week to halt the edit war. One day will not do; they'll just be back. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Widr. Katie talk 22:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Troll back at it, just after page protection expired. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

NOTE: - They even beat MusikBot - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

26 October 2016

Semi-protection: Ongoing BLP violations; pending changes aren't helping at all. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

It seems to me that the pending changes are helping perfectly, and are doing what they are supposed to do, but I will wait for a third opinion.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined PC protection is not designed to prevent all disruption: it's meant to prevent disruptive edits from going live, while still allowing new users to make edits. So, in my view, its failure or success is not judged by whether disruption is occurring, but whether it is too frequent for the experienced users that are patrolling the page. In this case, I don't believe it is too frequent. Therefore, I agree with @ Ymblanter:, and am going to decline this. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I beg to differ; disruption has been going on for a while, and semi-protection is what this page has long needed to begin with. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 12:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A series of IP editors have been adding a section to the article that accuses Barro of being "hostile" or "opposed" to Christians, which is cited to a tweet from Barro's account that does not mention Christians, e.g.,: [66], [67], [68], [69], [70] etc. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 17:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 18:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly hit by multiple, possibly connected IPs, making unsourced/dubious/hoax edits. The VS fashion show is held in November-December each year, and the casting for this year's show hasn't been done yet (according to the VS website), so the IPs/IP-hopper can't possibly know who will appear this year... - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 18:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Thomas.W: Are you sure? References stated that casting has occurred. [1] Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 18:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Emir of Wikipedia: The source in the article (a link to the VS website) only says it will begin this week, not that it's done. It's also a bit early to claim that they have walked this years show, as the IPs have done, when the show hasn't been recorded yet. - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 18:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "Bella Hadid Will Walk in the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show". ELLE. 26 October 2016. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
I understand and I support this request for semi-protection. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 18:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 18:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, as per version history and related talk page(s) of the past weeks, see also several check user requests during the same period, Roland zh ( talk) 09:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, same incidents as per Public Eye (Erklärung von Bern) and [[Alternative Bank Schweiz], Roland zh ( talk) 10:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, same incidents as per Public Eye (Erklärung von Bern) and Alternative Bank Schweiz, Roland zh ( talk) 10:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring has been going on much of the day. Muffled Pocketed 14:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected – 5 days. EdJohnston ( talk) 14:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax created 3 times in an hour by sockpuppet vandals. Wikishovel ( talk) 08:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has a long history of anons coming along and deleting large chunks of properly referenced content. Schwede 66 08:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The article is about the owner of a beauty pageant that held their annual show yesterday, and is being repeatedly attacked today by multiple IPs (probably supporters of contestants who didn't do as well at the show as their supporters hoped they would...) who post insulting comments, insulting nicknames and generally unfavourable opinions about Mr Itsaragrisil and his character and integrity, or lack thereof... - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 09:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 10:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Recently frequent vandalism has occurred Pieceofmetalwork ( talk) 11:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:34, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Salted article re-created at talk page: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaishankar Chigurula. Wikishovel ( talk) 12:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of IP vandals changing his occupation. IagoQnsi ( talk) 03:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Several thousand transclusions. Jc86035 ( talk) Use {{ re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of AFD template by varying IP editors (possible sock puppetry involved). WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP editor hasn't been put off by pending change protection. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 07:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. because there is nothing constructive coming from IPs. I'm leaving the PC protection in place. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Over 230,000 transclusions. Jc86035 ( talk) Use {{ re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitely. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Request protection until November 9 following election. TM 00:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. I do not want to lock this or the other candidate articles unless we absolutely have to, and there's been little disruption to this point, so let's hope the IP's timeout helps. Katie talk 03:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP users. — Skyllfully ( talk | contribs) 03:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal who is insistent on inserting WP:original research opinions.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 03:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been many IP edits over which this page had rapidly degraded. These edits are most likely from students at the schools (the edits blame the company for their summer school) and the only way to preserve it currently would be to semiprotect it . Lucasstar1 ( talk) 05:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., should be sufficient for this level of vandalism-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 05:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: The article was protected back in 2009 for sockpuppetry reasons. Let's try a lower protection to see if the article can receive better attention. © Tbhotch ( en-2.5). 09:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Good grief, is this a long chain of page moves. ARBIPA isn't my area, but the sockmaster seems to have been inactive for the last couple of years. The only active admin in the protection chain is Philg88, so let's start there. Katie talk 19:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ KrakatoaKatie: I have no objection to dropping the protection level - my name is only on there because I moved the article following a requested move. The original protector was Vegaswikian, who no longer appears to be active.  Philg88 talk 06:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Matches today and vandalism has begun. Qed237  (talk) 18:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While there is a lot of editing going on, very little of it appears to be deliberate vandalism. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent, long-term IP vandalism. Resumed virtually immediately after last protection was removed. James ( talk/ contribs) 18:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Almost all of it was from a single now-blocked user, several days ago. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65B8:F59A:5E97:E329 ( talk) 03:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The recent IP edits seem to be, not vandalism, but a disagreement over the name of one of the members. I spent about an hour researching this and I think I have figured it out and corrected it. See talk page for details. MelanieN ( talk) 00:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 22:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Some of it is pretty bad, but disruption is infrequent and there has been one good edit accepted. Borderline decline in favour of keeping PC MusikAnimal talk 00:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Highly expect vandalism and/or disruptive editing. Semi Protection to exclude those who do not meet the criteria of auto confirmed users. Willhire ( talk) 22:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. MusikAnimal talk 00:10, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; High level of IP vandalism throughout the article's history. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 03:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN ( talk) 23:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistently vandalized with mentions of Gavin Free due to this popular video. IagoQnsi ( talk) 20:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 03:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, continuing after end of recent protection. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 03:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Recent spate of vandalism by redlinked onetime users (see here). Quis separabit? 16:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued despite warnings. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 20:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Loaded with spam and recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Only two deletions, the second was author-requested. Not enough to salt, in my opinion MusikAnimal talk 20:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IPs and new accounts with some personal attacks in edit summaries and additions of various unsourced information. Subject is a recently deceased person and the accounts claim to be current and past members of the family, evidently there's a lot of strong feeling there. bonadea contributions talk 07:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • combining duplicate request: COI IPs and new SPAs seem to be squabbling over the article content. I have not looked at the content yet but the edit summaries are BLP vios Meters ( talk) 07:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This si a huge mess, and least one registered account was involved, so I've locked it down. All of the disputed edits will need to be gone through one by one to see if further revdel is required. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:08, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple seasoned editors edit-warring over inclusion of Palestine. : has implications under WP:ARBPIA too I expect, but haven't looked into that. Muffled Pocketed 10:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over 20 vandalistic edits performed by IPs today. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Appears to have been very short-lived and ended some hours ago, but here's a brief semi just in case MusikAnimal talk 00:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandalism will probably not cease until after Halloween. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the article's protection history, it's needed protection every year around Halloween since 2005. — Maile ( talk) 21:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IPs. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 22:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 23:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Beeblebrox ( talk) 23:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC) reply

27 October 2016

Equestria Girls pages

Semi-protection: You might think Equestria Girls is a series of animated films with some merchandises, when actually, with a big toy company that is Hasbro as the developer of the franchise, it isn't. Each Equestria Girls film is simply a part of yearly sub-lineup. I'm trying to clarify that by restructuring all the related articles. But some anonymous user, with a varying range of IPv6 IPs, disagrees with no apparent reason, and is keep reverting everytime I make an edit. I want all the IPv6 IPs to be blocked from editing Equestria Girls and other Hasbro related articles. JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 15:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Sounds like a content dispute, not vandalism. tutterMouse ( talk) 15:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
This is not a simple content dispute. The problem lies in the IPv6 user's attitude. The user reverted all the revisions in question just because the user didn't like how the change was made, and gave no acceptable reason. Also, the user did not show any intention to join the discussion. JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 05:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC

--->

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content. Alex|The|Whovian ? 03:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content + vandalism -- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 06:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Valid at the time, but the information is now added with appropriate sources. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent IP hopping editor insists on removing Spanish names in contravention of WP:NCGN#Falkland Islands. W C M email 08:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. He's been stable on one IP for quite a while, so blocking can be effective here if he persists after warnings. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing the CSD template. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Already deleted. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP user 82.32.154.144 repeatedly inserting excessive plot details which goes against WP:NOTPLOT on a character for a TV drama who is currently featuring in a prominent storyline alongside the another character Robert Sugden. IP account has been blocked before for disruptive editing on other character profiles for the same TV show. Wes Mouse  Talk 11:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP user 82.32.154.144 repeatedly inserting excessive plot details which goes against WP:NOTPLOT on a character for a TV drama who is currently featuring in a prominent storyline alongside the another character Aaron Livesy. IP account has been blocked before for disruptive editing on other character profiles for the same TV show. Wes Mouse  Talk 11:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits, including BLP violations, have been coming from IPs lately, due to the recent controversy involving the subject. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 19:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent IP and new editor tense changing/breaking. Widefox; talk 19:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 20:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SA 13 Bro ( talk) 16:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. @ SA 13 Bro: When the IPs used for vandalism are all close together like that, a range block is best. You can report to WP:AIV after warning them appropriately (across multiple IPs, possibly, but as if they're a single user) and request a range block. Alternatively, see Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to make range blocks. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Yet more mildly-annoying vandalism from same user and occasional abusive message on my talk page, currently using Special:Contributions/86.161.111.117. Nigej ( talk) 18:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the current IP disruptor. Katie talk 19:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated "satanist" vandalism. Mtpaley ( talk) 19:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Its template protected but should be unprotected or fully protected. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Flow234: Are you sure you've got the right link there? Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 11:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined @ Flow234 and Emir of Wikipedia: This article is unable to be created because it triggers the title blacklist (which template editors have access to override). This cannot be changed. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Content dispute by POV newbie – Semi not working. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Question: Since the article was semi protected, which user is engaging in disruptive editing? The one that was blocked? I dont' see it. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Oshwah: Yes, User:Lyndsayalarice blocked for 31hrs. but there is little doubt they will be back. User passed autoconfirmed today. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 03:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I understand the concern, and indeed took the earlier request and subsequent discussion, but we'll cross the bridge when the water comes. Samsara 13:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:54FE:11E3:7566:4F1F ( talk) 17:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High traffick page that is suffering from persistent obvious vandalism. The page has already been protected more than once in the past because of this. Dark Knight 2149 16:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations, multiple IPs adding content sourced to IMDb, removing BLP sourcing tags, etc. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 01:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 03:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There hasn't been a constructive edit made in over a month ( diff). This "hector" vandalism ( example has been going on for months ( diff from January), and there have been five vandal edits today. I suggest long-term semi-protection. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. with pending changes resuming thereafter. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: SPA vand-only account vandalizing shortly after PP expired. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Borcker is back at it. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from alleged sock. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vanity page (with incorrect capitalization of surname) deleted three times in 24 hours. Wikishovel ( talk) 12:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 16:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Semi-protection until after the World Series is over, November 2nd at the latest, is probably a good idea. Strongjam ( talk) 15:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Seems that one anonymous user, who has a different address each day, keeps deleting content. I've put in some requests for editing assistance to make sure that the data is correct. Until things get sorted, please protect this for a few weeks. NYCRuss 16:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But the next protection will likely be full protection, NYCRuss. Please lead by example by starting a talk page discussion. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks! Discussion has been started. NYCRuss 16:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 14:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 16:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Rob13 Talk 17:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. H akan· IST 13:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: DavidMasterton1965 ( talk · contribs) added a long, bloated "plot" section to this article back in March. It has been removed by several editors but the user returns under various IPs and re-adds it a few months later. Diffs: original add, first removal, second add, second removal, third add, third removal, fourth add, fourth removal, fifth add, fifth removal, sixth add, sixth removal. Different IP doing the adding each time, and at least 3 editors doing the reverting. Problem is likely to continue due to the Halloween season. I suggest a protection length of a couple weeks. IllaZilla ( talk) 14:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, deletion of sources and addition of unsourced content by numerous IPs (several of whom have been banned). Egghead06 ( talk) 05:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection requested in order to prevent warring over subject's alleged political views. Protection believed necessary until post- election blues somewhat dissipate.- The Gnome ( talk) 11:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and possibly sock puppet vandalism. Revision history. Eric S.V. ( talk) 17:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 17:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mikepellerin talk 00:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 00:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Oshwah. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 03:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –  Life of Tau 00:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet ( talk) 14:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Drmies. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 02:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Vandalism by a series of possibly linked IP editors. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Dennis Brown. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 02:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: As it will only be edited by Coordinators, IP's shouldn't be editing it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 02:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page recreated 4 times within this month alone. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 14:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Creation protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Oshwah. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 02:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual removal (on grounds that we have to source their WP:OR) of sourced material by anonymous editor. Muffled Pocketed 19:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose. There are no any sources which say, European Open and Irish Open are the same tournament. Chris Turner archive [71] listed Irish Open after the German Masters, which have own article. European Open, German Masters, Irish Open are the separate entities in the title of that page. 95.133.148.13 ( talk) 19:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Mmmm. See what I mean. No-one is actually saying they are the same tournament, just the same ranking. Stop taking the blooming thing away. If anything, add more content to the blooming table. Alright?
Further note just to say the Turner site, whilst a mine of info, != a WP:RS. Gotta stick with the sources we got, cara. Go raibh maith agat, Muffled Pocketed 19:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Drmies ( talk) 22:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please make boney kapoor's page from temporary semi protection to permanent semi protection because this page has been attacked by many ips in a long or short duration of time. . Arjun Kapoor 85 ( talk) 01:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined @ Arjun Kapoor 85: First of all, you're asking for an increase in page protection in an area of this page that is intended for requests for decreases of page protection. Second of all, that article has had fewer than 50 edits in the last 10 months. There's certainly little justification for indefinite protection especially if MBlaze Lightning has been reverting disruptions as needed. MusikAnimal has semi-protected it for a few days. If that doesn't stop the vandalism the semi-protection can be extended. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an ongoing edit war over a mis-attribution to Sanger and also other issues relating to abortion. This has been going on for a few days. Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs attacking this BLP. Meters ( talk) 19:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Bud Dunn ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semiprotection Today's featured article, being vandalized like crazy. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term BLP vandalism and perhaps some sockpuppetry due to RevDel and protection logs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator DoRD. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: The husband of the nurse Poh Sim Roberts, as identified by himself on my talk page, persists in adding the words "corrupt and malfeasant" to the article without supporting evidence. I've added a paragraph with the one reference he suggested to me, but it doesn't support what he claims to be true of the Nursing Council, and apparently he has been doing this for some time and more than one editor has had to undo it. Katharineamy ( talk) 21:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Article is attracting quite a lot of IP vandalism. PK T(alk) 23:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Imminent77 ( talk) 16:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for 24 hours by Widr. tutterMouse ( talk) 19:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: This is a redirect that needs to be protected. Content was split from the article and has been re-merged following an RFC at Talk:European_Open_(snooker)#RFC: Should the European Masters entry be split from this article to a new article?. One of the participants has refused to accept the result by challenging the closer at User_talk:Prcc27#Talk:European Open (snooker) and reverting the merge. I appreciate that closes can be challenged but there are proper ways for doing this. I think it would be best to protect the redirect which can always be unprotected if the result is successfully challenged down the line. Betty Logan ( talk) 18:08, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Reduce to Pending Changes: Although the main article should remain as indefinitely semi-protected, I personally think that the talk page should be dropped to Pending Changes, which should allow for IPs/Newer Accounts to post comments for any changes to the article, yet at the same time have reviewers approve (or decline) talk page based edits due to persistent vandalism that happens on the main article. Tibbydibby ( talk) 16:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done We can't put pending changes on talk pages – the software doesn't allow it. Katie talk 18:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

28 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring IPs altering height/weight statistics. Dr. K. 06:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jetstreamer  Talk 10:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 21:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs kept deleting sourced info. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

No the electronic and R&B sources are sourced too, why can't they all be added? 82.132.232.59 ( talk) 19:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
IP, they are sourced and you're removing it without explaination in the edit summary. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 20:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: The anonymous IPs are back with disruptive editing as Semi-protection has expired. Please grant a longer extension, or higher protection. -- TaffyM talk 17:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For years, nearly the only edits this page receives are vandalism to, in one way or another, add "the population of Agloe is/was 1", a reference, I believe, to a book called Paper Towns. It's showing no signs of stopping, with a few times in the past week alone. Can we get indefinite semi-protection here?. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued sock puppetry attempting to add contested edits. -- Dane2007 talk 18:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued sock-hopping, block-evading IP. livelikemusic talk! 19:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term anon vandalism and disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — UY Scuti Talk 12:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP deletion of content by possibly linked IP's. An administrator incident report has been filed by User:Limit-theorem. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 14:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC) --> reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ BU Rob13: Would you say there is enough to add pending changes protection? Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Emir of Wikipedia: Personally, no, but it's borderline. I'm taking into account the fact that all but the most recent reverted edit was by a single IP, which could have been blocked if necessary. Only two IPs with vandalism spaced apart by a week or more isn't enough for me to apply pending changes. I always consider pending changes when reviewing requests and often apply it even when it isn't specifically asked for. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ BU Rob13: A block request is underway at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Strange reference removals by IP, but thanks for your help anyway. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 14:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 18:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr ( talk) 18:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection:, indefinite. Persistent racist IP vandalism after previous periods of protection. Markhh ( talk) 15:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandals - suggest protection until World Series is over. Justin15w ( talk) 15:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse by sock-hopping anonymous editor, who used to be an editor on the website. livelikemusic talk! 16:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 16:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term IP vandalism from many IPs. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — UY Scuti Talk 12:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tito Dutta ( talk) -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 14:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive user on several IPs removing maintenance templates. BilCat ( talk) 13:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – High-level of disruptive editing from sock-hopping IP. livelikemusic talk! 14:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Peacock ( talk) 14:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Widr. ~ Rob13 Talk 14:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking from User:MariaJaydHicky, using a new sock account User:Frownsy. Binksternet ( talk) 00:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ~ Irrigator talk 04:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Various IP users (from the same range) continuously reverting addition of template to page, without engaging in discussion as to why. -- Whats new? (talk) 05:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined, at least one of the users was autoconfirmed, meaning semi-protection would not be effective. Please try to discuss with the user and follow the general dispute resolution avenues.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 02:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Appropriate volume for pending changes. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: By user request. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 02:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This is true even for user pages (see protection policy). ~ Rob13 Talk 04:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: By user request. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 02:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This is true even for user pages (see protection policy). ~ Rob13 Talk 04:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:54FE:11E3:7566:4F1F ( talk) 02:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content, immedietly after expiry of previous protection period. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 02:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently, my name is a frequently vandalized article. Evking22 ( talk) 02:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking from User:MariaJaydHicky, using a new sock account User:Frownsy. Binksternet ( talk) 00:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one sock account that's easily identifiable has recently targeted this page. Message me on my talk page with more evidence/detail if this is a page that's been frequently targeted by this sockmaster within the past few months. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant clogging of the edit history due to vandalism and it makes it hard to see what auto-approved members did what. . — JJBers ( talk) 00:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined The volume is fine for pending changes. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The only IP edits to have ever edited this page have been unconstructive. There really is no need for anon's to edit this page anyway... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip user seems to be fighting with itself, a short auto confirm user protection would help without the need to block a user who is both reverting and adding vandalism. -glove- ( talk) 00:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined It appears he was trying to revert several revisions of vandalism by undoing them one at a time. Looks to be done now. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 04:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content, removal of sourced; gossip about upcoming film. 2601:188:1:AEA0:54FE:11E3:7566:4F1F ( talk) 01:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced anagrams. Additions are less often but consistant. Alex|The|Whovian ? 02:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 04:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 04:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 17:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 01:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – as a note there does indeed seem to be a writer with this name though. Wgolf ( talk) 23:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ~ Rob13 Talk 01:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Autobiography, repeatedly recreated in several versions. Also requesting a block of the account. 2601:188:1:AEA0:54FE:11E3:7566:4F1F ( talk) 23:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Feel free to take the account to WP:ANI. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 01:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: the usual unverified edits by an IP user (obviously a sock puppet of a banned user). Borsoka ( talk) 17:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ITN item. Target of several IP vandals. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 20:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Request is for extending the current full protection to November 8, per the original request made on October 21. My request is made because protection was given after a user repeatedly deleted the page's contents that are being discussed now. Indications suggest edit warring and repetition of arguments will persist after this page is deescalated from full protection, despite consensus. Terrace Rock ( talk) 21:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by CambridgeBayWeather. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 23:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Oshwah. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B ( talk) 00:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

29 October 2016

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 12:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 12:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeatedly false claims about beeing xenophobic. ( 87.158.169.98 ( talk) 12:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Ascetic Rosé 15:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor ( talk) 17:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple disruptive edits, adding of unsourced material, and long quotes. Pinkfloyd11 ( talk) 20:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: continuous unverified edits by IP users who are obviously the sock puppets of the banned user Bosnipedian. Borsoka ( talk) 10:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: From Oct. 24 through today, the page has been disruptively edited by a block-evading anon IP who is persistent and who doesn't appear as if he's going to stop — he was doing it early this month, was temporarily blocked, then immediately began doing it again. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 13:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Request to protect own user page. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism spanning months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism and BLP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by Materialscientist, Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tito Dutta ( talk) 14:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent content removal by IP editor. WP:3RR is violated. Codename Lisa ( talk) 14:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Dennis Brown. Tito Dutta ( talk) 16:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism began on October 28, after the protection expired on October 25 (from 22). The article needs prolonged protection, for example previously it was protected from 7 Feburary until 7 May, and from 4 June until 4 September, and every time the protection expired we had to deal with IP socks by User:PavelStaykov and the very same disruptive edits. Crovata ( talk) 14:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please, can someone protect the article? The IP sock-puppet done 7 reverts. -- Crovata ( talk) 15:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Already done by administrator Drmies. Katie talk 16:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism and BLP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 16:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming of unrelated content by repeatedly blocked 173.67.x.x IP-hopper. Range-block would be better, but it appears no one is capable of implementing one. A RevDel of people's personal information such as phone numbers from edit summaries may be appropriate as well.) Xenophrenic ( talk) 14:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 18:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Agreed, more than one editor has already gone against WP:1RR. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 20:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Personally I'd suggest full protection until November 9. There's nothing encyclopedic to be written about the election that cannot wait two weeks to be written. Huon ( talk) 21:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also left a note at the talk page. As soon as it expires, we will need to restore semi-protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection - Constant editing of article by socks (IPs & non-confirmed accounts) of banned editor HarveyCarter. Admins (Bbb23 and Favonian in particular) play whack-a-mole with the socks, but some discouragement from posting would be useful. This is a long-term problem, so requesting semi for as long as responding admin feels comfortable in applying. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 03:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, but the rate is just once every several months here, which is too low for semi. Pending changes would work, but it probably wouldn't discourage in the intended manner. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 08:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page being targeted by Cebr1979. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 03:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. cc BU Rob13, in case he objects. Feel free to modify/revert without my permission. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring sock target by Malusia22, a known sockpuppeteer and troll. Blake Gripling ( talk) 06:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JQTriple7 talk 07:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection, per WP:ARBPIA3. Endless IP attack. Zero talk 23:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. for edit warring. I'm holding off on protection unless the disruption starts spanning across multiple users. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E036:CE49:FD17:5346 ( talk) 02:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E036:CE49:FD17:5346 ( talk) 02:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – The alleged birth year has been added, but no reliable sources have verified the year yet. Some editors keep adding it over and over. George Ho ( talk) 02:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations by multiple IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 20:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Article doesn't exist, DerbyCountyinNZ. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Aaaaagh! DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 22:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply
It's actually Mbah Gotho, and the IP edits do not rise to a level requiring page protection. Huon ( talk) 22:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations by multiple IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 22:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Huon ( talk) 23:02, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E036:CE49:FD17:5346 ( talk) 01:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Pariah24 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of logo by different I.P's in the 66.87.XX.XX block. KhaasBanda ( talk) 02:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Given the high visibility due to Donald Trump and the high levels of non-constructive IP edits, I think PC protection would work. In addition, previous protection expired a month ago and there has been a steady stream of disruptive edits since. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protection
High level of vandalism from unregistered contributors. 80.221.159.67 ( talk) 03:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, again -- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 06:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Request denied yesterday from the same timestamp; duplicate request must have been missed. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is about an STD, it's getting damaging edits and censorship of images and text. Unfortunately not all of this was caught until now because of the relatively low level of editing. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 10:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ahmad join ( talk) 18:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Huldra ( talk) 20:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If not a high risk template for permanent protection than a temporary protection will do until the world series is over - this is a highly visible template due to current events. Garchy ( talk) 16:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was some dispute over how a link should work. If any protection is given, it's going to be full protection. There is no vandalism here whatsoever and pages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: The previous IP vandalism has started again now that the previous protection has expired. - David Biddulph ( talk) 17:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP edit over the three days since semi ended. Let's wait and see. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 20:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by another admin. Tito Dutta ( talk) 20:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism occurring the past few months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 21:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced and poorly sourced edits coming from IPs, because the hosts of the podcast Hello Internet asked listeners to edit the article in their latest episode. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 23:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

30 October 2016

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Keri ( talk) 10:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New wave of disruption. Qed237  (talk) 11:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237  (talk) 11:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Makeandtoss ( talk) 12:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruption and addition of unsourced content. Qed237  (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High levels of persistent IP vandalism. JTP ( talkcontribs) 16:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing; vandalism . RF23 ( talk) 17:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Almost 50 edits this past day, mostly 1 byte in size. I'm not exactly sure what's going on. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Widr. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 20:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 21:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Widr. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 21:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption due to argument between fans, what titles to count. Qed237  (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 16:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Gündoğdu ( talk) 15:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 16:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term NFL vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected five days and Pending-changes protected for the rest of the football season (three months). Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tried before, but vandalism wasn't persistent enough. It has continued since then so would be great if someone could take a second look. Thanks. AIRcorn  (talk) 06:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Zzuuzz: Fourth protection this year and you set it to only 3 days? Well, hope it works but it is safe to say we will be back here within a week. Qed237  (talk) 19:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Basically, recent weekend controversy and no edits in the last six weeks. I encourage you to return with it next time (or alternatively another admin is welcome to extend it). -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 16:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertions of defamatory material to a BLP. Muffled Pocketed 13:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, this is decidedly not a BLP. Katie talk 16:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ KrakatoaKatie: D'oh! So I was only seventeen years out  ;) sorry bout that. Muffled Pocketed 16:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Same user has moved the page twice in a one-month period without prior discussion. BilCat ( talk) 12:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Done Katie talk 16:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently released movie. Test edits. Addition and removal of unsourced contents regarding reception of film. Better to protect for atleast 30 days, IMO. βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 16:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated deletion of mass data. - Ascetic Rosé 15:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can't do ECP yet, and this is at SPI, so let's allow the process to move forward. Katie talk 16:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

31 October 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP issue. Karst ( talk) 18:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I was just going to make the same request. This has been going on for ever, the molestation, kidnapping have been unfounded for decades. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 19:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I don't see an obvious BLP exemption (and indeed WP:3RRNO says what counts as BLP can be controversial), so everybody's edit-warring and thus a full lock is required. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and maybe some sockpuppetry. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. General Ization Talk 13:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor ( talk) 18:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP vandalism never seems to stop. Though IP vandalism doesn't happen every day, but a high percentage of IP edits are vandalism. I'm aware of the instructions above to NOT request indefinite protection, but at the same time I believe vandalism won't stop with this article. Thanks in advance of consideration of my request. • SbmeirowTalk16:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 ( talk) 17:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – After the semi was lifted, there have continued to be serious BLP problem edits on this page. It's low volume, so PC would be appropriate for 6 months or a year. agtx 16:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has become a vandal target by different IPs after his trade to the Cleveland Browns today. 331dot ( talk) 17:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor ( talk) 18:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ziauddinseetv ( talk) 21:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Creation protection: This page appears to have been recreated quite a few times. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 12:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done Creator has been blocked. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 12:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect until film releases, at least 15 reverted edits in the revision history, minimal constructive edits. Eric S.V. ( talk) 12:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edits not very frequent: let's try PC protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced material (anon. edit-warrior). Muffled Pocketed 13:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The disruption has stopped now, but it was pretty mental while it lasted. Wouldn't want it happening again. Muffled Pocketed 14:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP-violations by IPs and throw-away accounts (adding totally unsourced childsex allegations), by either a small group of people or a single individual. Edits that have been going on for well over a year now (see protection log). - Tom |  Thomas.W talk 08:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Protection is necessary if vandaliser IPs continue to revert rollbackers. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lowlihao. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 11:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not super frequent: let's try PC protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Some anonymous IPs are edit warring. I tried setting up a new section on the Talk page for those anonymous editors to discuss things [75]. I then reverted the article to where it was before the edit war, and pointed the warring editors to the section. [76] One of the anonymous editors then undid my revert, with this explanation: "well stop fucking reverting for no reason you dick. Explain what problem you have, if you actually have one." [77] SolidPhase ( talk) 11:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Seems that "SolidPhase" had some sock puppets. If he would only explain why he is reverting the article. No evidence of any bed for semi protection, clear evidence of need for user to explain their actions. 82.132.227.125 ( talk) 12:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The IP 82.132.227.125 is presumably one of the anonymous warring editors. SolidPhase ( talk) 13:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This seems to be a (really silly) content dispute. Please sort it out on the talk. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More vandalism, AGAIN! This needs to be fixed, it seems like an article needing of protection, I mean, come on? Revision history. Eric S.V. ( talk) 13:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism following latest race. T v x1 14:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 14:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from a series of IPs claiming to be Mike Stevens, most likely the same person from different computers. Thereppy ( talk) 02:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined There was only one instance of blatant vandalism since the previous protection, not enough to justify protection again. The apparent COI could be just that, a COI: and is best handled elsewhere, possibly at COI. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent removal of negative information. Cahk ( talk) 07:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Widr ( talk) 07:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Peacock ( talk) 12:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 12:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Was hit by a vandal immediately after previous protection expired (which, puzzlingly, was only a 2-week protection, given the page's long history of vandalism and that it's a BLP). Lizard ( talk) 07:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. due to a slow-moving edit-war. Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. to deal with vandalism. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: The same IP-hopping vandalism resumes every time the protection expires. David Biddulph ( talk) 07:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by new editors about the line up for the show (which has not been officially confirmed yet). Class455 ( talk) 07:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and sockpuppetry by multiple new editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Oppose: Noticeboards are never pending changes protected, and they should not be semi-protected either. The vandalism will be quickly reverted and the users will be blocked. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 03:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Declined Basically, per the above. Way too high volume for pending changes. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection with pending changes: There could be potential vandalism with some IPs editing anti-Semitic marks in light of the 2016 US elections. 135.23.145.149 ( talk) 03:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know that talk pages aren't normally protected but this is a long inactive user, so there should be no need for IP's to send them messages. Sro23 ( talk) 03:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Having been protected multiple times for months on end, the vandalism shows no signs of stopping. Suggesting either a 1 year temp or indef semi protection. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sam blatant spam, posted three times in three days. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of image by IPs and SPAs. -- Dane2007 talk 04:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A couple of the removals, including the latest, are by autoconfirmed accounts, so semi-protection is not going to help with that. The other edits are disruptive but infrequent, so let's try PC protection. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of vandalism right after expiry of previous semi-protection. My Chemistry romantic ( talk) 05:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MB298 ( talk) 06:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MB298 ( talk) 06:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been target of vandalism and general BLP disruptions for years. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism due to page logs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 03:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by editors - Mo Williams is still under contract to the Cavs, and thus on the roster. Vjmlhds 03:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. My Chemistry romantic ( talk) 04:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eperoton ( talk) 00:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Fairly long-term protection may be needed. These types of articles have become prone to disruptions. - Ascetic Rosé 05:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The SPI has repeatedly been blanked by the subject. — teb728 t c 00:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined The disruptive account has been blocked, and a CU or clerk will protect the SPI if it is deemed necessary. ​— DoRD ( talk)​ 00:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism, it's that time of the year again. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism editions and disputes by unregistered users. TheBellaTwins1445( talk) 01:48, October 31, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 18:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined It's pnly been recreated once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP's immediately adding unsourced content after the previous protection period expiry. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 19:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined Just the once. Wait and see. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ​— DoRD ( talk)​ 02:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 04:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jimmysmithwalker ( talk) 07:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nillurcheier ( talk) 10:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 00:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ​— DoRD ( talk)​ 01:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protection: Multiple sockpuppets recreating the article. Note that the article isn't deleted yet however it has been recreated three times this month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Creation protected ​— DoRD ( talk)​ 01:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Full-protection: additions are undone rapidly by alternative accounts. Aerozeplyn ( talk) 12:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

A block of this account has been requested [79] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 12:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. – EdJohnston ( talk) 20:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Indefinite move protection: Source for debate if this should be moved or not and there is an RM on article talkpage which is sometimes ignored. Qed237  (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ CambridgeBayWeather: Could you also move the page back as the editor moved it again and you now protected the redirect? Qed237  (talk) 22:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Move protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
@ CambridgeBayWeather: How about moving the article back to the proper page title per article talkpage? Qed237  (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated driveby IP vandalism, blanking etc. Echoedmyron ( talk) 22:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 19:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 21:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 22:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 21:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 22:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet ( talk) 21:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 22:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same edit-warring as per previous protection in June: a shifting IP repeatedly restoring an older version of the article with a rambling lede about how well-armed some Ming naval ships were. McGeddon ( talk) 18:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: IP addresses have been edit warring for quite a while now about who the founders of this company were. Please semi-protect for say 6 months. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 18:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. @ Ks0stm: You may want to protect this one similarly to how you protected Buffalo Bills. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB ( talk) 20:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected one week, 12 hours (through next Sunday) and Pending-changes protected three months (through the NFL season). Ks0stm ( TCGE) 22:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet ( talk) 21:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the offending edits seem to be by IPs, and the edit rate is rather slow, so I pending changes protected instead of semi or extended protection. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 22:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply