- 2016
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 May 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article history shows long-standing vandalism by IP or new users. If indef semi is seen as too long the minimum duration should be 6-12 months. Denniss ( talk) 17:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent BLP issues.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TJH2018 talk 18:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the vandalism is recurrent but spread out over time, it seems like a good candidate for PC protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for that... TJH2018 talk 19:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 15:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 16:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Please extend the length of protection on my talk page. Socks of the original IP have continued to attack the unprotected subpage so protection of my main talk page is still required. [1] [2] [3] Meters ( talk) 17:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. 333 -blue 12:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
13:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
13:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 17:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stale copy of mainspace template. User is indef blocked. See /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Δ/Example/Al-A%27raf . Legacypac ( talk) 02:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, no vandalism detected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an ongoing RFC that affects this name space at Talk:World_Open_(snooker)#Requested_move_11_March_2016. A tournament article should not be constructed here unless the outcome of the RFC is that the World Grand Prix is indeed a completely different tournament and not just a rebranded one (thus necessitating a new article rather than a rename). If a new article is required this will precipitate changes across all the performance tables on many player articles (which currently link to the World Open article) so it is important not to jump the gun otherwise it will lead to the player articles and templates linking to the wrong tournaments (see [4]). For example, if you look at Judd_Trump#Performance_and_rankings_timeline you will see that the World Grand Prix entry encompasses the World Open results, so by creating a new article and not correcting all the links will result in breaking all the links that should link to the World Open. Editors creating a new article at this page without updating the links in the performance tables are creating a catastrophic and inconsistent mess, so I am requesting that the namespace is semi-protected until the RFC concludes. If the outcome of the RFC is to create a new article for the World Grand Prix then creating a new article needs to be part of a systematic approach which encompasses updating the performance tables too. Betty Logan ( talk) 09:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is persistently being vandalized by various IP addresses for the sole purpose of promoting the baramatiworld.com website. Dhrm77 ( talk) 13:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 23:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Subject of the article keeps trying to censor a sourced fact. White Whirlwind 咨 06:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
11:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: for one month please. We have an IP "believer" adding unsourced/badly sourced content. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 07:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
IP-hopping warrior
- Jet2.com ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Rossiya Airlines ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Air Transat ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Thomas Cook Airlines ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Thomson Airways ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- TUI Airlines Netherlands ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- EgyptAir ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. There is also an ongoing ANI discussion here — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 16:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
[Update] Please read the last section of linked ANI discussion before taking any action here. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 19:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, I want to hold on these for several hours, maybe even until Saturday. If it gets bad, go ahead and lock them. Katie talk 19:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Procedural. IP didn't bite so we'll close this.
Katie
talk
03:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content after recent release from protection period. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:F5FC:43A3:CABB:CF9 ( talk) 22:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Fancruft additions. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 01:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
04:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Salt, speedy deleted twice on 17 and 20 April. Deleted again per AfD. After creating thrice, see no reason why they won't try again at some point. Dubious notability. TimothyJosephWood 16:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. It should normally be up to the recent deleting administrator,
User:Anthony Bradbury, whether to salt it or not.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock/meat puppets are adding NPOV issues to the article, as well as vandalism. Recommend a short-term semi-protection be applied. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Mike V for 48 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Music1201 talk 01:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Music1201 talk 01:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Music1201 talk 01:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Music1201, are you sure you have the right article?
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Anna Frodesiak: Yes, look at the history, almost all edits made have been reverted. — Music1201 talk 01:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Music1201, are you sure you have the right article?
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Music1201 talk 01:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring by IP. Skyerise ( talk) 03:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Skyerise: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The RFC isn't closed yet and you guys are already back to edit warring over it. Geez.
Katie
talk
04:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
02 May 2016
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (had to undo 4 to 5 different vandal changes)-- 176.104.110.11 ( talk) 12:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
16:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been targeted frequently over the last month. I think it is because of the recent religious freedom law they passed. I recommend pending changes protection anywhere between 2 weeks and 2 months long. Mr. Guye ( talk) 20:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP and new-user vandalism. 34 of the last 50 edits were vandalism or reverts of vandalism. Firebrace ( talk) 21:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It hasn't been protected in a while so let's go through the escalation motions again. Receptive to steep escalations in the future.
BethNaught (
talk)
21:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Not Only one IP edit has been accepted; not only one. If semi is too high, renew pending changes.
George Ho (
talk)
08:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
16:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite low editing, reverted edits within the last seven days were just childish pranks. Nonetheless, such reverts with low editing frequency would justify renewing pending changes. George Ho ( talk) 09:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
16:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the past few days. Yeepsi ( talk) 16:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors and non-autoconfirmed accounts over the course of today. Entranced98 ( talk) 17:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very very high profile controversial page, protection just expired yesterday, vandalism has already resumed. Last protection was semi for 2 months so consider protecting for longer. Everymorning (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has suffered from frequent attempts to add unsourced disputed claims, especially within the past seven days. Of course, I see some good edits by IP, justifying renewal of pending changes, but I'm torn. George Ho ( talk) 08:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
17:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent deletion of well-sourced content and addition of original research and unreliable sources by new users. Firebrace ( talk) 15:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent low-rate IP/Socking from people affiliated with this publisher. When the one-week semi-protection expired, it took 3 days before the socks came back. It's low-rate, but persistent and annoying. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP-vandals popping up today - perhaps with the recent May 1st/ "May Day" worker's holiday engendering student homework & classroom assignments. Shearonink ( talk) 15:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
18:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 ( talk) 23:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator
SQL.
Sceptre (
talk)
16:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: for a substantial period. Since months, persistent disruptive editing by a dynamic IP, with repeted source falsification (changing the meaning of sourced content without changing or challenging the source) and addition of unsourced content.-- Phso2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Phso2: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As seen from the edit history, IP editor/editors is/are constantly changing casualty figures that is contradictory to the sources cited. Their edit summaries have mostly consisted from only jumbled letters. Several editors have reverted them (including me) but they keep making the unsourced changes. EkoGraf ( talk) 10:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 ( talk) 23:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
SQL.
Sceptre (
talk)
16:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: for a substantial period. Since months, persistent disruptive editing by a dynamic IP, with repeted source falsification (changing the meaning of sourced content without changing or challenging the source) and addition of unsourced content.-- Phso2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Phso2: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As seen from the edit history, IP editor/editors is/are constantly changing casualty figures that is contradictory to the sources cited. Their edit summaries have mostly consisted from only jumbled letters. Several editors have reverted them (including me) but they keep making the unsourced changes. EkoGraf ( talk) 10:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bombo Radyo Philippines ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DZWX ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Bombo Radyo Philippines ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Baguio Radio ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry; same user using various IP addresses keeps on linking the pages above to a userspace sandbox/draft. Sixth o f March 04:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- As an alternative suggestion I have asked User:Appable if I can just delete the sandbox page thereby removing the problem-- Jac16888 Talk 10:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Appable has blanked the sandbox article and there hasn't been any anon activity so can this be considered done or is protection still neccesary? tutterMouse ( talk) 07:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving... —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
17:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for two weeks: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 21:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Recent vandalism and nonsense addition by wide range of IPs. Short term probably sufficient, as subject just had a Google Doodle, whatever that is worth, but it seems to attract some attention. DVdm ( talk) 09:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is under attack for adding the same POV (promotional and fully unsourced contents) using multiple IPs. Several times warned but no improvement is seen in user behaviour. MahenSingha (Talk) 12:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculations. Qed237 (talk) 14:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Sock puppetry. CLCStudent ( talk) 14:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism . Alex|The|Whovian ? 12:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Daily IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 14:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: (remove move protection) There has never been any attempted move of this article, and the original reason for move-protecting this article is now invalid. — Music1201 talk 05:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected as you failed to contact the protecting administrator (Zzyzx11) as is required and noted above. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Question: I am requesting a second admin opinion: iirc, when protection was applied, the article was under vandalism because the
"Redskins" name is controversial, so I did both forms of protection at the time. Per
WP:MOVP: "Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved". There was also a discussion about changing the name that is
archived here, and there are probably more elsewhere because of this name controversy. Also per
WP:POLICY, "Policies and guidelines should always be applied using reason and common sense", so I felt that since the "Redskins" name was being vandalized in the article body itself, it would be only common sense to do
WP:IAR and also apply move protection. Now, I'm not sure if the original reason is invalid as the OP suggests because the controversy regarding the name still exists, it is still recently in the news
[5]
[6]
[7] and there is currently no reason to move the article. Thanks.
Zzyzx11 (
talk)
19:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Note:
Zzyzx11, I am in full agreement that both of the original protections were needed and that they continue to be so. In this case there seems to be no net positive to unprotecting or removing pending changes from the article. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
22:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected I concur with the two administrators above. Nothing good comes from unprotecting this now.
Katie
talk
04:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – seems vandals are moving here now . Matt spac 01:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article has been a target for fans. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 10:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shaded0 ( talk) 20:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for two weeks: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 22:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for two weeks: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 22:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by non-users. Shaded0 ( talk) 01:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I can't even tell what is true and what is false. It has been so thoroughly vandalized with false information. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – particularly surrounding the year of birth. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 06:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
07:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – some are the intruders are vandalize at me. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Done
Widr (
talk)
07:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Laber□ T 19:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent addition of same spam by ever emerging socks DVdm ( talk) 20:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of vandals. Nymf ( talk) 20:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also Aziq Azaman. Laber□ T 22:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent reintroduction of material implying acquisition has been officially consummated (only announced intent) when it has not, as well as uncited claims related to acquisition. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent disruptive vandalism from multiple IP editors over months; prominence of article makes this unlikely to cease. Tom (LT) ( talk) 23:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Wrestler injured, it appears legitimately. Lots of IP vandalism and fake obituaries. Sceptre ( talk) 00:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
00:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Was protected after I asked for some eyes on the IRC channel. Sceptre ( talk) 01:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: This is a copy of the text from the Creative Commons website, analogous to the text we already have for the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, and am requesting that it receive the same level of protection as that template. KDS4444 ( talk) 15:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – WP:OWN issues and edit warring. clpo13( talk) 15:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13( talk) 18:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:OWNerly "take it to talk" reverting by IPs in the 2606:6000:* range, again, per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive912#Rangeblock_needed_for_Millennials_.E2.80.94_Generation_X_long-term_disruption. (Page is currently pending-changes protected, but the problem isn't IP introduction of bad content, it's the flat reverting of any content that the IP doesn't 100% understand or agree with.) McGeddon ( talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The editor McGeddon seems to continue to request page protection for certain generational articles over what she/he claims are violations of Wikipedia edit war policy. Yet based on the bright line rule (more than 3 reverts) it's an exaggeration of the problem. We are not to use page protection when we don't like editing on our preferred pages. Please check how many times McGeddon has requested page protection then compare the actual number of edits and the corresponding talk page proposals to work things out. No editor can have it both ways i.e. engaging in numerous reverts themselves then running to this page and requesting a higher level of page protection over a bogus edit war that they may participated in too. 2606:6000:610A:9000:A5A0:9546:81CE:A4E1 ( talk) 20:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- If a logged-in user is warned about edit warring and continues to edit war on a single article, that user is blocked. If a logged-out user on a dynamic IP is repeatedly warned about edit warring and continues to edit war a single article, blocking the IP is not an option, but protecting the article is. -- McGeddon ( talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- As I said count the number of edits. The burden of proof is on you to show where the 3 bright line rule has been broken, otherwise your claims are unsubstantiated. Wikipedia also doesn't not want us to use page protection as an editing tool. 2606:6000:610A:9000:A5A0:9546:81CE:A4E1 ( talk) 20:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The protection change is being requested on the grounds of "disruptive editing", not 3RR. -- McGeddon ( talk) 20:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- But you just wrote above that I was "repeatedly warned" about edit warring. And you are using that claim as a basis for a higher level of page protection on Millennials. I took the time to look at each claim of an edit war (that was made above) and none of them goes beyond the bright line. So where is your proof of an edit war that you are using as a basis of "disruptive editing"? Please stop wasting my time. 2606:6000:610A:9000:A5A0:9546:81CE:A4E1 ( talk) 21:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs ignoring source, disruptive edits. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 20:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible. Laber□ T 22:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Vandalism by multiple users as a response to the deletion of their website and Facebook account. Laber□ T 22:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
23:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
03 May 2016
- World Open (snooker) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- World Grand Prix (snooker) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption – There was a recent RFC on whether to move the article to a separate article which resulted in a "no consensus". As highlighted at this discussion (see the discussion after the closed RFC) this has consequences for hundreds of other articles, specifically the performance tables in the player articles which link through to this article. The IP is refusing to respect the "no consensus" result at this article and at World Grand Prix (snooker) which now means there are a couple of hundred articles where the World Grand Prix link now takes readers to the wrong article. Both articles need to be semi-protected because the IP clearly doesn't understand the issues or simply doesn't care that a couple of hundred of articles need fixing to accommodate the split. Betty Logan ( talk) 00:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. User Betty Logan wants to take an advantage over ip user using this request. His requested move proposition was not supported by another users, see Talk:World Open (snooker). Saying they're that the World Grand Prix (snooker) is a continuation of the World Open (snooker) appears to be pure WP:OR, there is no source that says that, and indeed many sources, including the BBC and WorldSnooker say that it was a new and inaugural event in 2015, see BBC, Matchroom Sport, Herald Scotland, Sporting Life, WorldSnooker (archived). 95.135.111.186 ( talk) 00:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since when was this a discussion page? No votes should be placed here. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
01:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Creating a second article (which informally amounts to an article split) without fixing the internal linking system utterly assf**** a huge number of performance tables. Let me present an example:
Judd_Trump#Performance_and_rankings_timeline. On the seventh row of the tournament table you will see an entry for the World Grand Prix, which links through to the World Open. This makes no sense now because the IP has removed the World Grand Prix results from the World Open article. The IP is simply not experienced enough or familiar enough with the structure of the snooker articles to understand their integration. Splitting out the content to another article means that a couple of hundred articles need to be fixed. I proposed an article move to circumvent this problem (the links would stil work through a redirect) but manually splitting the content requires a manual fix. If you look at that discussion Nigej explains the problem in some detail. This is precisely why
WP:NOCONSENSUS recommends retaining the status quo; it does not imply that if one side cannot get a consensus to do what they want then the other side gets carte blanche to do what they want. This is why the two articles need to be semi-protected: the IP does not comprehend the damage to the internal linking system that his edits have caused, and right now we have a couple of hundred articles that are now linking to the wrong tournament.
Betty Logan (
talk)
02:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Could you find any sources that says World Open (snooker) and World Grand Prix (snooker) are the same tournament?? 95.135.111.186 ( talk) 10:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Creating a second article (which informally amounts to an article split) without fixing the internal linking system utterly assf**** a huge number of performance tables. Let me present an example:
Judd_Trump#Performance_and_rankings_timeline. On the seventh row of the tournament table you will see an entry for the World Grand Prix, which links through to the World Open. This makes no sense now because the IP has removed the World Grand Prix results from the World Open article. The IP is simply not experienced enough or familiar enough with the structure of the snooker articles to understand their integration. Splitting out the content to another article means that a couple of hundred articles need to be fixed. I proposed an article move to circumvent this problem (the links would stil work through a redirect) but manually splitting the content requires a manual fix. If you look at that discussion Nigej explains the problem in some detail. This is precisely why
WP:NOCONSENSUS recommends retaining the status quo; it does not imply that if one side cannot get a consensus to do what they want then the other side gets carte blanche to do what they want. This is why the two articles need to be semi-protected: the IP does not comprehend the damage to the internal linking system that his edits have caused, and right now we have a couple of hundred articles that are now linking to the wrong tournament.
Betty Logan (
talk)
02:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since when was this a discussion page? No votes should be placed here. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
01:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Katie
talk
16:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism (adding in controversies which may be BLP and might also be used to game the ARBCOM 500 editing restriction.) Sir Joseph (talk) 01:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure if needed anymore, user is aware of UNDUE now and will seek other areas to edit in order to get to 500. Sir Joseph (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined
Katie
talk
16:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Reduce to semi-protection: Article was fully protected due to disruptive editing related to the event's ongoing nature, and the (legit) injury of wrestler Enzo Amore (see Enzo Amore protection request above). Full protection is completely overkill, especially as most disruptive editing was by IPs and wasn't needed for any other PPV, especially 12 hours after its end. Sceptre ( talk) 16:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- SQL, is this edit war over yet? Katie talk 00:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done by
SQL. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
20:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It was protected until today, vandalism started immediately again. Multiple IPs all changing the same information day in and day out. Ogress 18:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Peter Sam Fan 19:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Replace the semi-protection until 21 May 2016 07:55:32 GMT. 333 -blue 03:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Paging Ymblanter. Katie talk 04:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Pending changes only available for articles, not templates.—
Bagumba (
talk)
09:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Popular character on popular show; the show is back for a new season and the constant IP vandalism has resumed. — TAnthony Talk 14:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 16:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 16:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per this RfC. Mlpearc ( open channel) 23:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm going to defer this one since I declined it at the start of that RFC. However, I will say that I think this is an admin decision, not a community one, and that indef protection is unwarranted here. Katie talk 00:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I have to agree with
Katie on this one, a local group of editors do not get to override site wide consensus on the use of semi-protection (especially indefinite use). I lengthened the current pending changes configuration to indefinite, but that is honestly the most I can do (and IMO more than is probably needed). —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page-redirect vandal is at it again. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already done.
Katie
talk
16:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 16:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 16:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Repeated re-insertion of BLP-questionable material by unregistered editors. The one registered editor to reinsert the same material was blocked 24 hours for edit-warring with it. MPS1992 ( talk) 16:54, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Civil war partisans attacking page and other editors. Toddst1 ( talk) 17:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
17:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit war by one registered account and multiple IPs, all of whom have valid points. Full protection is needed to get all editors to the talk page to discuss the edits and work toward consensus. AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected by Coffee for 7 days though expect it to last much less.
tutterMouse (
talk)
11:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Childish vandalism, couple of accounts blocked already. Protect until boredom sets in. Andy Dingley ( talk) 11:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
11:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There is no reason for this to be created. To vandalize is the only reason why it is created. Peter Sam Fan 15:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possible IP hopping by 95.135.111.186 and 46.211.253.152. Betty Logan ( talk) 21:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. User Betty Logan want to take an advantage over ip user using this request. Steve Davies retired, see [8] 95.135.111.186 ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, the talk page discussion is ongoing.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – >200,000 transclusions. Obvious candidate for template protection. ~ Rob Talk 02:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment: {{
Redr}} redirects to {{
This is a redirect}}, which is already template protected. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
04:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- True but the transclusion count for the redirect is roughly the same as the template itself so it isn't redundant.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely.
Favonian (
talk)
09:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- True but the transclusion count for the redirect is roughly the same as the template itself so it isn't redundant.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous POV pushing by multiple sockpuppet accounts. JWNoctis talk 09:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is now blatant
sock-puppetry rather than content dispute, hence the semi.
Favonian (
talk)
09:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Controversial article which is currently GA-rated but faces highly regular disruptive editing from a wide range of IPs. Over the last month it has experienced such edits on 1 May, 27 April, 30 March, 17 March, 9 March, 13 February, 2 February, and 29 January. Permanent semi-protection would be a big help in putting a stop to this constant problem, which has been going on for years. Midnightblueowl ( talk) 23:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 100,000 transclusions. ~ Rob Talk 02:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 60,000 transclusions. ~ Rob Talk 02:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 60,000 transclusions. ~ Rob Talk 02:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It's time for a renewed semi-protection. Persistent sock puppetry. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 20:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Reddit joke/nonsense gone awry. Vandalism from multiple different IPs. Majora ( talk) 23:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by SQL for 48 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – defamation on hndis page multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Today alone has seen roughly 20 and this continues to occur. Feedthepope ( talk) 04:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Edit - Probably about 10 vandal edits a minute. Users creating accounts in order to vandalise. Feedthepope ( talk) 04:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Update/correction It was about 7 edits / minute. Thanks for the protection! I see that it's done. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 04:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC}
-
Semi-protected by Widr for 7 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been repeatedly attacked over and over again. Most edits have been vandalism and reversion. I don't think pending changes is working. I advocate 1 week long semi-protection. Mr. Guye ( talk) 21:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Numerous accepted edits via PC. Some childish vandalism but most reverts are for nothing serious enough to warrant blocking all unconfirmed users —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Please protect this. Betty Logan keeps trying to redirect without any explanation and no consensus. There are constant edit wars going on there including undiscussed page moves and even there is still discussion to split or keep section of the article.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 23:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Taeyebaar: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined You opened a discussion at AN, so let's keep it there.
Katie
talk
00:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- List of 2016 box office number-one films in the United States ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: User is using multiple proxies out of mexico to disrupt the article. Maybe sock IPs from an editor I was recently in a dispute with Fruitloop11 ( talk) 02:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Not done
Katie
talk
00:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Doc seems to be getting a lot of hate on my account, so it stands to reason that I should request Protection for his TP. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 05:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined for two reasons: pending changes isn't approved for use on talk pages (and I don't think it's technically possible to do so) and, as an admin, Drmies can semiprotect it if they see fit. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
05:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Freeatlast, I appreciate the sentiment, but Bongwarrior is right. Thanks to you both, Drmies ( talk) 13:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Full Protection:There have been multiple users adding inflammatory and libelous language to Mr. Diveroli's wikipedia page. He is the subject of a movie that will be coming out this summer and the traffic to his page is likely to increase tremendously. Following this traffic will likely be a slew of more false stories about his life. Ldiff23 ( talk) 20:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Try using the talk page, which hasn't been touched in almost a year —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: incessant and recurrent vandalism (see [9]); page has been protected previously for same reasons. Quis separabit? 20:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined The existing pending changes protection seems sufficient given the low edit rate and the fact that some good anon edits are getting through —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet ( talk) 22:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
00:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Move protection. TheSqrtMinus1 23:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Katie
talk
00:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
KrakatoaKatie: I think you accidentally added full protection as well as move protection. I don't think admin only editing is required at this point as it is really not that bad. Move protection sure, as there is an ongoing move discussion. But not full protections. --
Majora (
talk)
00:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Eep! I didn't use Twinkle and when I changed the move options it changed the edit options too. Sorry, fixed now!
Katie
talk
01:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
KrakatoaKatie: I think you accidentally added full protection as well as move protection. I don't think admin only editing is required at this point as it is really not that bad. Move protection sure, as there is an ongoing move discussion. But not full protections. --
Majora (
talk)
00:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recurrent POV whitewashing of bio of political activist by "new" editors. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 14:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Katie
talk
17:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just won championship. Qed237 (talk) 21:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jenks24 (
talk)
21:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection to template protection.— Godsy( TALK CONT) 23:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Xaosflux?
Katie
talk
17:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Not only is this page used in system messages, but it is also additionally fully protected with cascading protection from the
Main page. —
xaosflux
Talk
18:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Xaosflux?
Katie
talk
17:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
04 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This should have been requested a few days ago, but today is the subject of the article and lots of IPs first and only edits are coming through to "contribute" to this page. One day or at least until the end of the 6th is probably in order. JesseRafe ( talk) 13:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
16:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP addresses due to the current wildfire event. Rockysmile11 (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 14:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People adding fake titles for their next album. Kinetic37 ( talk) 15:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unconstructive edits by IPs and newly registered sock puppet accounts. Dorpater ( talk) 10:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
16:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
16:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ilikeguys21 ( talk) 13:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Lectonar..
MelanieN (
talk)
16:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent run of IP Vandals. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:30, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Vandals linking her husband to The Zodiac Killer. Crboyer ( talk) 16:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection seems a little more appropriate here as since this article was put on pending changes all of the edits have had to be reverted and most were vandalism. Omni Flames let's talk about it 08:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is in addition to the existing indefinite PC protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – News about Mr Dutton's portfolio and unflattering viral photograph have attracted vandals to the article. Requesting partial protection until the news cycle passes, but could be required until the July 2016 election is held. Knobbly ( talk) 13:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You're right that this could continue until July, so please feel free to re-request if vandalism continues when the protection ends.
Jenks24 (
talk)
14:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. . Olowe2011 Talk 13:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jenks24 (
talk)
13:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- That seems like an unnecessarily short timeframe,
Jenks24, given that it's been protected multiple times for a month in the past with no end of vandalism in sight.
Primefac (
talk)
14:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Primefac: Thanks for catching that, I've extended it to three months. I hadn't checked the logs, so I thought it was just a brief incident (I only became aware of this because of a note on my talk page). Jenks24 ( talk) 14:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- That seems like an unnecessarily short timeframe,
Jenks24, given that it's been protected multiple times for a month in the past with no end of vandalism in sight.
Primefac (
talk)
14:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Moscow Connection ( talk) 02:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor seems intent on adding off topic material. . FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 04:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just one IP.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indef would be more appropriate as the article has been protected twice in the past. Omni Flames let's talk about it 07:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just one IP in the last days; apart from that not enough activity to protect. Last protection in 2014!
Lectonar (
talk)
07:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection IP-hopping editor(s) makes a large number of edits to mask moving India up in rankings without support of data in linked source. Does not respond on user talk pages. Rmhermen ( talk) 07:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Since April 26th I see just one IP....
Lectonar (
talk)
08:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Pending changes: This article about a Canadian Senator has been the target of User:Stoneacres and IP editors making persistent inflamatory or partisan edits in violation of BLP and NPOV. Electoralist ( talk) 22:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Stoneacres is an auto-confirmed editor, so pending-changes won't do any good. Not enough activity to semiprotect.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Page has been target of persistent vandalism for the last few months. I am not sure which level of protection is required, but it should be restricted to trusted wikipedia users.-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 00:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined I see about 8 or 9 vandalism edits this year. I will watchlist.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption over pronouns. See article talk page for details. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rather slow-and-low-level
Lectonar (
talk)
08:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Edit warring, editors need to sort things out on the talk page instead of tearing swaths out of the article. ミーラー強斗武 ( StG88ぬ会話) 03:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protected 3 times in the past so indef protection seems appropriate. Omni Flames let's talk about it 08:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Kusma (
t·
c)
11:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism related to an injoke ( Malcolm Malcolm). UaineSean ( talk) 21:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All of these pages are being edited by IP addresses against MOS (its across multiple sports and years). . Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war in progress with multiple registered and IP editors involved. JWNoctis talk 10:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page previously protected for same reason, same IPs apparently. Coretheapple ( talk) 20:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 22:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP content blanking has resumed after the previous protection expired. Cordless Larry ( talk) 06:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Omni Flames let's talk about it 10:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor repeatedly replacing redirect with promotional article about non-notable company, despite being advised at the Teahouse not to do so. Joseph2302 ( talk) 12:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. In effect this redirect (imposed within minutes of the article's creation) is an attempt at a kind of speedy deletion of the article, without discussion or process, and without meeting A7 or G11 or any other speedy deletion criterion. The author was within his rights to contest the redirect (and he didn't do it "repeatedly", he did it once). If you think the subject does not rate an article, but your opinion is contested, you need to go through some standard process such as AfD or PM.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:27, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, intentional overlinking on part of User:Imc00ln0treally over the last month till now. Protection might not be necessary but maybe someone could do something. For further detail, see User_talk:Imc00ln0treally JWNoctis talk 13:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
20:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 ( talk) 13:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
19:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent but infrequent IP vandalism. Joseph2302 ( talk) 14:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection is lost after merging the history of Mount Star Secondary Boarding School into this one. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 14:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restoring the pre-existing semiprotection.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring + likely block evasion. 2607:FB90:429:C53B:0:46:4A7B:1301 ( talk) 18:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined
Widr (
talk)
19:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing (repeatedly changing "nationality", changing from British English to American English etc) by an IP-hopper, against several other editors. Thomas.W talk 19:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A COI editor wants to push their product and removing required tags and has used multiple geographically diverse IPs to do so. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 16:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
18:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last couple of days. -- samtar talk or stalk 18:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
18:54, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of previous disruptive editing to article that lead to its previous block; addition of unconfirmed speculation, and information that directly contradicts the happenings of the television series. livelikemusic talk! 01:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Livelikemusic:: Sounds like a sockpuppet of User:Imtitanium, who often targeted this article (and others) in this manner. If you have time to compare the behaviour of the accounts in more detail, consider reporting this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imtitanium. — Psychonaut ( talk) 14:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Following the semi protection of Don Costa the same block evading "Sicillian spammer" using multiple IPs, has moved onto Don Costa's daughter Nikka Costa - Arjayay ( talk) 11:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr..
MelanieN (
talk)
22:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing with speculation and unsourced content. Please protect this page until at least 2016 NHL Entry Draft is held. – Sabbatino ( talk) 11:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I didn't want to protect it for a long time, because I do see constructive editing from IPs. If vandalism resumes, ask again.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User is deceased; please protect per standard procedures. See Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2010#Steven Patrick Dhuey (Walloon). Psychonaut ( talk) 13:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
20:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all drive-by IP edits are kiddie vandalism. Wastes editor resources, best to do indefinite semi. Montanabw (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
18:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism . Nat Gertler ( talk) 17:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
17:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
05 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 20:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Currently used on many pages across Wikipedia and meets the definition of a "highly visible template." Unregistered edits to this template could potentially effect a wide array of Wikipedia articles. . Olowe2011 Talk 21:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Transclusion count is quite low, and no history of disruption —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep saying things like "Hillary Crooked Clinton" or things like that. Peter Sam Fan 19:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 19:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Peter Sam Fan 18:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
18:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recent vandalism by numerous throwaway accounts, quite probably the same user. Valenciano ( talk) 18:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
19:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism today by IPs and new accounts due to an ongoing controversy over an article published yesterday in this journal ( e.g.). Hopefully it should die down in a week or two. SheepNotGoats ( talk) 18:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
19:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evading vandal vandalizing the page. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Bsadowski1 for a very temporary two hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
19:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations of uncited personal-life claims about minor children. There's no way to tell if it's a prankster out to tweak a billionaire or perhaps the billionaire himself doing OR. Either way, this article has been protected in the past, most recently from September to October 2015, and in recent weeks the anon-IP vandalism has become highly time-consuming: Five times in the last week, and 17 times so far this year. Since this has been going on since at least February 2014, I believe this article truly needs long-term protection of at least six months. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 04:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from the IP . — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 13:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: False and disruptive editing from IP .05:28, 26 November 2015 32.218.42.198 (talk) Sjwiki2014 ( talk) 14:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of IP adresses. :(. ... Lhealt (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Coordinated Universal Time ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Coordinated Universal Time ( | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Sockpuppetry by User:Vote (X) for Change. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change Jc3s5h ( talk) 17:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by likely block-evading sockpuppets. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 14:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relatively large amount of IP vandalism. Seems like every other edit is a vandal. HarryKernow ( talk to me) 15:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Edit: Ctrl+F, type in "revert", 31/50 edits in the first page mention reverting. Definitely highly vandalized. HarryKernow ( talk to me) 15:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
15:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Laber□ T 15:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Seems to have stopped now.
Katie
talk
09:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined
Katie
talk
09:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent editing against consensus by anons within an IP range, even after warnings and blocks. BollyJeff | talk 12:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I need a delivery of salt on this page please . Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 18:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
07:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP and new user vandalism. Pinguinn 🐧 21:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
07:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping anonymous account insisting on adding contentious content sourced to unreliable sources.Over a period of 12 hours has used no less than 4 different IPs, has been reverted once by ClueBot, [10] and insists it is happy to edit-war. [11] Based on edits, it appears that this editor may be Wikitouts who is indef blocked after disruptive editing and sockpuppetry through Wikitoutnow and IPs. AussieLegend ( ✉) 11:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
11:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent protection: Insertion of copyrighted content Laber□ T 06:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: IP vandalism Laber□ T 06:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
06:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User request for user subpage. — IB [ Poke ] 09:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
09:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IPs adding unsourced edits. The show has a big storyline just starting on-screen, so the list is attracting more attention than normal. JuneGloom07 Talk 00:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by non-autoconfirmed editor. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoaxing from the 166 animation hoaxer IP. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer#Copycat for more details on this LTA. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 07:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
09:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
I recently created two Wikipedia page for musicians. One was created without any issues, but the second one says that it is protected and only administrators can create the page. Is there a way to unprotect this page so I can create it? I have finished the page but just need to be able to move it.-- PPPotty ( talk) 14:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- @
PPPotty: Link here to your draft, please?
Katie
talk
04:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
KrakatoaKatie: since
PPPotty has yet to respond, here's what I believe to be their draft:
User:PPPotty/GoldLink. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
20:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ KrakatoaKatie:, @ The Voidwalker:, Sorry for my absence. There are two articles. The one I created is Ro James but the one that I am trying to create is here User:PPPotty/GoldLink. The article for Ro James is already created and reviewed. It is the article (GoldLink) in my userspace that says is protected from creation. Thanks for looking at this and I again apologize for my delayed response. -- PPPotty ( talk) 04:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
KrakatoaKatie: since
PPPotty has yet to respond, here's what I believe to be their draft:
User:PPPotty/GoldLink. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
20:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done I moved your sandbox and created the article. Be sure to add categories. No opinion on pass/fail of
WP:MUSIC.
Katie
talk
09:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing with a clear nationalistic POV (everything was invented in the US or is American, whether it was/is or not...) by an IP-hopper across multiple articles. Mars (chocolate bar) was protected yesterday for the exact same type of edits by the same editor. Thomas.W talk 17:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a little bit recently, but I know that this will be the target of a lot of vandalism over the next few days, so as a representative, I would protect this page, pronto. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection:Edit war or no concensus.-- Takahiro4 ( talk) 06:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (
Nakon I think we both hit the protection at almost the same time... anyways I don't think you intended for indef full protection.) —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
06:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm good with the 2-day protection. Nakon 06:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Removal of move protection: The article was move protected because of a short-term edit dispute four years ago. Graham ( talk) 03:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined No new article targets provided
Nakon
04:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Mike V for 48 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
04:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Asked for protection yesterday, was told not enough recent vandalism... so of course it's revandalized by an IP today. Nat Gertler ( talk) 22:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a complete stomping ground for IP's and anonymous editors to edit-war by way of adding in pure speculation and original research. livelikemusic talk! 23:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:5988:9970:C910:F270 ( talk) 00:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 19:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. -
CorbieV
☊
☼
23:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ CorbieVreccan: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Offline 00:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Olowe2011 Talk 23:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page-move vandalism – This page was protected with the wrong protection level. It should have been protected with "move=sysop" rather than "move=autoconfirmed". User talk:Riley Huntley, which was moved because the user was renamed, should also be move protected with the right protection level. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Page is protected as intended, in the future consider contacting the user in question before requesting adjustment to protection in their userspace. --
Cheers,
Ril
ey
23:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A very persistent editor has been adding a trivial pop culture mention to the article for a long time. They've been using multiple IP addresses and refuse to discuss the matter. I think it has gone on long enough and the page could use pending changes protection. Opencooper ( talk) 18:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP address keeps vandalizing page, will not stop after 4+ warnings. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 18:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Linked in MediaWiki:Filedelete-reason-dropdown. Precedence seems to be that shortcuts linked in a MediaWiki page should be fully protected to ensure essentially that Wikipedia doesn't break. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined I think it'd only be of concern if the redirect or the MediaWiki page itself were highly visible. Even if these shortcuts get deleted it's not going to break anything. The CSD shortcuts for instance, which are also linked in the MediaWiki namespace, are only semi'd – and that's only because they've experienced vandalism. Going to blank your other requests instead of declining one by one —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Set of articles (some BLP) troubled by IP hopper
- Judith Barsi ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Heather O'Rourke ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nancy Allen (actress) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Brittany Byrnes ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mary Kay Bergman ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Babe (film) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Adriana Caselotti ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Suicide of Kelly Yeomans ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection for a couple of months til this calms down per this ANI. Jytdog ( talk) 05:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to O'Rourke and Bergman: 2 weeks semiprotection followed by 6 months PC protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Barsi and Yeomans.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected. Byrnes and Babe are already semiprotected for a year. Caselotti is PC protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Applies to Allen.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Update: In response to the request below, I added one month of semi-protection on top of the existing PC protection of Caselotti. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past 3 months. — btphelps ( talk to me) ( what I've done) 17:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
17:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor, who has been twice blocked already, is again vandalizing my talk page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
17:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ref-desk troll has returned. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of the customary three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
18:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ Favonian: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Mr. Bot. Guess you weren't programmed to consider short expiration time. Favonian ( talk) 21:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
06 May 2016
Semi-protection: A cited genre keeps being removed by IPs without any discussion or explanation. It's happened several times in the past month alone. Kokoro20 ( talk) 19:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr:, it should be protected for more than just one day, considering this isn't the first time the article had to be protected over this, and due to the fact that this has been going on for months now.
Kokoro20 (
talk)
21:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'll keep it on my watchlist. We'll see after the current one expires. Widr ( talk) 21:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr:, it should be protected for more than just one day, considering this isn't the first time the article had to be protected over this, and due to the fact that this has been going on for months now.
Kokoro20 (
talk)
21:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – My talk page was moved by another editor. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs | ✉) 21:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done, it was deleted anyway--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – My talk page was moved by another editor as vandalism. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs | ✉) 21:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs edit warring to insert non-encyclopedic content about some internal tiff. No response to talk page thread. Meters ( talk) 21:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GAB Hello! 16:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't generally protect talk pages, especially not for so long, but this is ridiculous. The article has needed virtually continuous protection for the last several months.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A number of different IPs have added the same info to the lede which Materialscientist ( talk · contribs) removed as a NOR violation. They've been reverted again by another editor and myself, and are ignoring all requests in edit summaries and on talk pages to come discuss it. Diffs: 1 2 3 4 Krelnik ( talk) 16:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While rather infrequent, all IP edits since this past Christmas Eve have been disruptive, and this will likely continue without semi-protection. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 17:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., more appropriate in this situation--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is a lot of speculative edits that he has won the mayoral election although there is not yet an official declaration. Lift protection after formal declaration. Marianian( talk) 19:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
19:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Upgrade to Full protection: - pre-emptive information about the results of an election he is running in are being added to his page please fully protect to prevent this. Sport and politics ( talk) 20:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- It appears that the result has been declared as per [12]. Is protection still required for the article? Nakon 20:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Full protection is required, yes, as the pre-emptive information is still being added by auto confirmed users. Sport and politics ( talk) 20:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Only the results of the first round have been announced, the election is run under the Instant run off voting system, and the declaration has not been made, also the winner only becomes mayor-elect until the sign the declaration accepting the Office of Mayor. The declaration has still not made, I repeat not been made. Sport and politics ( talk) 20:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- The final results will reliably appear
here and not in a newspaper.
Sport and politics (
talk)
20:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
21:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 15:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A student publication at this college recently published an article that is receiving some national attention and unregistered editors are making their opinion known by adding NPOV material and opinions to this article. ElKevbo ( talk) 19:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
19:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Per user request, im in the process of making sure my user pages cannot be vandalized. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 19:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
20:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Kjp993 ( talk) 20:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Biased information inserted, attempted to tidy but I'm not great at this. 203.34.16.181 ( talk) 12:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
15:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 14:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed.
Katie
talk
14:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: User request. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 18:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected
Nakon
19:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Nakon: Thanks, you very much kind sir/ma'am :) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 19:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing by new users. Longer duration protection suggested.
Christopher, Salem, OR (
talk)
19:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
SemiFull-protection:
Page is now having pre-emptive editing adding by confirmed users, as well as unregistered and unconfirmed users.
Sport and politics (
talk) 19:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Ongoing election results coming out slowly, with the result being pre-empted. Page should be protected for 48 hours to allow for the election results to finish, and stop premature information being posted.
Sport and politics (
talk)
18:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 24h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was protected back in 2009 for an indefinite period, but in April 2016 User:Nyttend changed the protection level to "require administrator access" for a period of three days. After the end of those three days, the protection level was set to "no protection". All edits since then have been vandalism. Dee 03 12:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 13:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – odd how three accounts have popped-up, removed exactly the same content and then have drifted away. If this continues someone will have to go to SPI, but a lock here is not out of the question, although four edits over thee days may be premature. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP tests and vandalism. Vin09 (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection - Persistent addition of speculative content (iOS 10 successor). - Aoidh ( talk) 10:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
11:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It started when a band member came to the article to attempt to remove "Christian" from the band's genre. I warned the user that there may be a COI. Then an anon from Oak Lawn,Illinois came to make similar edits. I would like to see the article locked to anons and new editors for a few weeks until this blows over. I would rather not have to take this to an SPI if it continues. We don't usually supply preventative locks, but it could help to get the editor to start discussing in this instance. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 12:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
12:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
05:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö ( talk) 05:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
05:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 ( talk) 06:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To prevent from persistent attacks by WP:Block evasion user. Herman Jaka ( talk) 06:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:E9DA:93F6:7B43:7E67 ( talk) 03:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Endemic IP vandalism. Vrrajkum ( talk) 04:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from numerous different IP addresses. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism after it was already protected 1 month ago. Rwffh ( talk) 18:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
19:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
00:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 22:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
00:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 22:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Gilliam.
Katie
talk
00:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
07 May 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a range of IP addresses and very few constructive contributions. Chickadee46 ( talk) 17:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
17:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP is constantly removing content without any explanation. Been at it for a week now, and still reverting other users as of the past hour. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 17:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
17:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP user insistence of adding statements of what's not in the movie due to his perceived meaning of certain plot, when there are other equally plausible explanation. -- Will74205 ( talk) 19:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Something Was the subject of a recent ANI which attracted attention and the removal of a lot of unrelated material (I did stuff) about corruption in India. Now someone is in a bad way about it, also apparently random IP vandalism. Temporary, measures may suffice, to give some time to cool off. TimothyJosephWood 19:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 14:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protetion: Almost immediately after last protection ended article became target for vandals once again. Jonk382 ( talk) 20:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 20:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: riptde and an IP (probably the same person judging from the edit summaries about "fixing grammar mistakes") have been changing the tense of verbs to suggest that Bowie is still alive. Wishful thinking? I suggest semi-protection for about a week. Strawberry4Ever ( talk) 16:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – [13]. clpo13( talk) 16:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Me too ;-). -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 16:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced cast members. The page has been protected for this before. clpo13( talk) 18:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: riptde and an IP (probably the same person judging from the edit summaries about "fixing grammar mistakes") have been changing the tense of verbs to suggest that Bowie is still alive. Wishful thinking? I suggest semi-protection for about a week. Strawberry4Ever ( talk) 16:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – [14]. clpo13( talk) 16:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
16:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Me too ;-). -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 16:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced cast members. The page has been protected for this before. clpo13( talk) 18:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Over 20 cases of severe vandalism since April 4, 2016, from various IPs. I suggest protection for circa 1 month. Gap9551 ( talk) 15:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Dumbot removed the existing page protection on March 10th of this year-- since then there have been nearly a dozen reverted edits all from IP addresses and several of them done in good faith (but which were inappropriate for other reasons). The article is often edited by new users and students who are unfamiliar with Wikipedia and its policies (see the talk page section written by Invertzoo for reiteration of this). "Semi-protection" applied for any length of time will only cause this problem to come back in the future (as having had it expire has immediately caused it to return this time). I'd like to propose a longer-term of protection, but would actually like to suggest pending-changes protection as this will allow all of these new editors to "make" changes that other editors can then review and possibly reject if not appropriate. I understand that semi-protection is normally applied to frequently edited articles (which this one is), but semi-protection flat out blocks these editors, and doesn't even let them try to contribute; pending changes allows them to contribute, only not have that contribution actually go "live" until reviewed. I think this makes pending changes much more friendly in terms of attracting potential new editors to the project in the future, which is a perennial lament of Wikipedia. In either case, it looks like the protection should now be made indefinite, as the evaporation of the last one brought the "friendly" (good faith) problem right back full force. Thanks. KDS4444 ( talk) 15:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of unconstructive editing from anonymous IPs. Given that Khan has just been elected Mayor of London, these edits are likely to continue for several days if not weeks. Semi-protection would really help here. Midnightblueowl ( talk) 13:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unreferenced information. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 14:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant removal of sourced content by the same individual. Simione001 ( talk) 02:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
03:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have already tried to reason with this person. This has been going on for years. I have been abused and harassed by this individual. Please check my user talk page and history. Simione001 ( talk) 07:56, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Can this be (re-)protected until Khan officially becomes the mayor on Sunday? Cordless Larry ( talk) 08:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Ymblanter for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
10:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Everymorning (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: After the subject died suddenly last night, there has been a lot of IP disruptive editing. Not in particular vandalism, but unconstructive and problematic nonetheless. '''tAD''' ( talk) 12:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needing temporary semi-protection. User and IP address keep vandalizing. Thanks!. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 03:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you
Nakon!
CookieMonster755
📞
✉
✓
03:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Odd vandalism insisting on referring to the ring logo as a circle. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:45, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
04:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- It turns out the main user in question was already blocked before I filed this request,
Nakon, but the issues will likely continue from IPs and/or new users unless semi-protected.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
04:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- If the vandalism continues, please feel free to re-list. Pages are not protected preemptively. Nakon 04:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- It turns out the main user in question was already blocked before I filed this request,
Nakon, but the issues will likely continue from IPs and/or new users unless semi-protected.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
04:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Endless IP griefing. Ogress 22:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all vandalism with pending changes. — Music1201 talk 02:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Known hoax article name of Cow cleaner 5000 whose general MO involves associating Weekly Shōnen Jump and its publisher, Shueisha with terrorist organizations as well as harass Koavf. — Farix ( t | c) 21:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done, incorrect section.
Nakon
02:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic vandalism going back to last October, with various IP users (IPv4 and IPv6), with possible sockpuppetry involved, attempting to correct the episode titles by removing the hashtags which are part of the titles. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 23:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Short- or long-term temporary semi-protection: Call of Duty pages are often vandalized by IPs and the page for Infinite Warfare is likely to be heavily vandalized. Some IPs have vandalized it and have made unproductive edits within the past week. The game has received a lot of hate and after the reveal of Battlefield 1, it's definitely prone to vandalism. We can't be sure if the IPs will just let up and vandalize less than usual, but regardless, Call of Duty pages are always targets for vandalism. I'm just not sure how long it should be protected. Aria1561 ( talk) 02:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- That should be a good amount. Many thanks. Aria1561 ( talk) 03:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiply IP addresses. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 02:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 15:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes of the lead sentence with false statements. Aloneinthewild ( talk) 22:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: recent persistent vandalism from various IPs, improper deletions and unref/unexplained changes. Dl2000 ( talk) 22:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
08 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or renew pending changes; despite low editing frequency, the edits were bad. George Ho ( talk) 06:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected extended for 1 year from today.
Der
yck C.
21:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or renew pending changes. George Ho ( talk) 06:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected extended for 1 year from today.
Der
yck C.
21:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: To protect page being move. Bivek bhattarai ( talk) 19:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
21:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: edit warring Laber□ T 21:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 04:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by GiantSnowman for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
19:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Regularly expanded with promotional content, presumably by the subject himself. DanielRigal ( talk) 11:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Also semi wouldn't help because Salem is autoconfirmed now. Please re-request if sockpuppetry occurs.
BethNaught (
talk)
11:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 20:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Der
yck C.
21:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – When I seen, IP changes, IP changes, and I not know, which change is right!. ... Lhealt (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, try discussing it at the talk page first. I do not see obvious edit-warring, and I do not see obvious disruptive editing.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IPs and new users since about mid-March. Amount of vandalism is likely to increase, as Australia is in the middle of an election campaign. Suggest protection until at least the date of the election (2 July). IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
11:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: The article was indefinitely semi-protected due to an edit war back in March 2013. The protecting admin hasn't been active since this March. There doesn't seem to be any reason to continue with semi-protection at this point. clpo13( talk) 17:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
15:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC).
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article duplicates Katie and Orbie. I have redirected there twice, but it has been reverted by the same anonymous user. Fuddle ( talk) 02:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected; full protection is not justified.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 03:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bongwarrior.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I may be moving a bit early, since the day/Google Doodle related vandalism has just started at this point, but I noticed this article has been semi-protected every year since 2009 for Mother's Day, so might as well send the RPP request now. With Google Doodle added on, no reason to expect any difference from past years. Safiel ( talk) 04:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
10:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: *Sigh*, the vandals have returned immediately after the protection period expired... again... 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7CB9:F602:1A76:5300 ( talk) 01:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just as blocked is released more disruptive editing against the MOS . Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need page protection until the contest ends - may 31st. Saqib ( talk) 07:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued BLP policy violations by anons following expiration of previous protection. Kelly hi! 08:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Pesistent vandalism; Looks like semi isn't helping. KGirlTrucker87 ( talk) 19:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
19:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous IP vandalism for the past month, possibly longer. [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] Oatitonimly ( talk) 22:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One new editor and one more experienced editor are having a beef with one another. No talkpage discussion. Protection will encourage peace. – S. Rich ( talk) 06:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 24h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also asked editors to use the talk page. --
Stephan Schulz (
talk)
06:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Vandalism and biased editing is common on this page due to the controversial nature of his Philippine presidential campaign. 98.255.16.116 ( talk) (My Wikipedia Account, sorry about not logging in: mattjfromca ( talk) 21.08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Widr, the article was previously protected for one week. Why don't make the protection longer than that?
Israel's
Son
23:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- It can be protected again after that if necessary. Widr ( talk) 23:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Widr, the article was previously protected for one week. Why don't make the protection longer than that?
Israel's
Son
23:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 22:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13( talk) 23:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
23:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is article is regularly vandalised by socks of Caidin-Johnson. Please put a fairly long period of semi-protection on this to discourage him. DanielRigal ( talk) 23:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
23:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
09 May 2016
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ Widr: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 11:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection needed again: High level of IP vandalism from only one user, who has been using a couple of (now blocked) usernames and now using their IP (may also need to be blocked). — Prhart com♥ 14:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low-grade but persistent minor date changes, etc. Seems to be 1 or 2 people, so a week's semi might be helpful in discouraging this. BilCat ( talk) 18:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Peter Sam Fan 18:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking hoaxer. McGeddon ( talk) 09:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection ongoing BLP violations and witticisms about something or other.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
17:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Maile66: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maile66 applied PC1 . Maile66 also added extended confirmed protection. I assume the extended confirmed protection was an error so I have removed it.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it was an error. Thank you. — Maile ( talk) 18:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring by a newly-registered user. ApprenticeFan work 08:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism (BLP vios) by IPs. — Vensatry (Talk) 09:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shifting IP edit-warring that the website has been "abandoned", with no source. McGeddon ( talk) 17:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as previous 3-mos PP expired, vandalism began again - additions of Hitler jokes, racism, and repeated additions of "Fetty Wap" (replacing other legitimate content). Chrisw80 ( talk) 18:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Long term edit warring, with multiple IPs seeking to add unsourced controversial content. Same section has also been subject to promotional and copyright violation content. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 12:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator
Widr.
Katie
talk
13:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, long term. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Semi-protection cannot be justified with only seven transclusions (and never used in any of Wikipedia's articles). ( details). Eye snore 21:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- The protecting admins appear to still be active. Please try contacting
Slambo (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) or
WOSlinker (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) first, and then please request here if you do not receive a response. Thanks,
Nakon
22:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done It was previously used a lot but is no longer used that much.
WOSlinker (
talk)
13:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lombardi is a well known professional wrestler. This article has a long history of being targeted for both overt and sneaky vandalism by anon IPs and throwaway SPAs. It is a BLP and would benefit from having pending changed enabled to prevent the IP/SPA vandalism. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 04:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained/unproven removal of well-sourced content by IPs and non-auto-confirmed editors. 193.235.146.104 ( talk) 07:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ 193.235.146.104: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, protection should not be used to enforce your version on the article in the edit-warring.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I would suggest indefinite. -- Laber□ T 12:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Borcker changing this redirect back into an article. Previous month's protection expired a few days ago. McGeddon ( talk) 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
11:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Unintentionally created by Huggle bug. Laber□ T 11:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Longterm semi-protection This article continues to get vandalized every single day. It has gone on for months, and after a one-month protection late last year expired, the vandals were back almost immediately. Numerous editors constantly have to revert these vandals. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 23:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Pending changes protection appears to be doing its job.
Nakon
00:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 ( talk) 23:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 03:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past seven days, the PC doesn't seem to prevent such edits, like intended blankings. George Ho ( talk) 06:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
23:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I saw random comments on the subject being reverted or self-reverted; alternatively renew pending changes if that's too much. George Ho ( talk) 07:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
23:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One IP edit has focused solely on the subject and make bad changes to the page. In other cases, the page attracted bad unsourced additions about the subject. George Ho ( talk) 07:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
23:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 02:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over who is the mayor as of right now. I think the article should be protected until such time as the mayor-elect is sworn in to stop the edit warring. clpo13( talk) 23:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question: @
Clpo13: But
Sadiq has already sworn in by the time you made the request...?
Der
yck C.
21:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- The dispute on the talk page made it seem like that wasn't the case. clpo13( talk) 21:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. As there is just under 15 minutes until it's officially "official" (as described by one of the notes), I don't see a need to protect the page unless the edit warring continues.
Nakon
22:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of well-sourced content by IPs and non-auto-confirmed editors. 193.235.146.104 ( talk) 03:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
22:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am aware we typically try to avoid protecting talk pages. That said, the never-ending parade of sock IPs seems to merit an exception. . SummerPhD v2.0 01:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding that he is done at Real but season still going . Kante4 ( talk) 18:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPv6 . Geraldo Perez ( talk) 19:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPv6 persistent misuse of talk page for off-topic comments. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 19:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper adding PoV, deleting text, etc. Doug Weller talk 20:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Target of prolific sockpuppeteer User:Kingshowman, who uses it tendentiously for anti-Trump propaganda. '''tAD''' ( talk) 21:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
Nakon
00:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: apparent 3RR block evasion by IP. William Thweatt Talk Contribs 21:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Acroterion.
Nakon
00:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 23:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13( talk) 23:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The editing frequency is sparse. However, most of the edits regards endless additions of unsourced content by IP. Last revert was April 30. Apparently, the editing has died down; renewing pending changes would be justified. However, only one IP edit was accepted. George Ho ( talk) 06:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – or renew pending changes; the subject has been a target of vandalism or unjustifiable changes. George Ho ( talk) 06:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 06:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or renew pending changes; just one IP edit was accepted; the rest were either malignant or unsourced additions. George Ho ( talk) 06:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and tests. Vin09 (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection:
High level of vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing:
Comments:
User:Ракал and
User:Niele~enwiki must be baned of edit of all articles about the Syrian Civil War. Becaus these users found nothing better than make unjustifed changes and try provoke the war of edits. It should be said that all of this user's edits
contributions of Ракал and
contributions of Niele~enwiki are POV pushing (on maps) in favor of a specific groups. These users has a
WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality.
SvEcHpInXID (
talk)
11:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- And how we can see for now in this article prevail
chaotic unjustifed edits, and this means that need put protection, as this can stop chaos.
SvEcHpInXID (
talk)
19:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – People still keep adding unsourced info such as the Transformers 5 credit which is not even confirmed yet. nyuszika7h ( talk) 14:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy and vandalism. As Bongbong Marcos is a candidate for Vice President in the Philippines, suggest protection until at least the date of the elections in the Philippines on May 9, 2016. Vic2426 ( talk) 15:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: High level of IP vandalism. Election related disruptive edits 112.201.223.226 ( talk) 03:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several IP's (likely the same user) blanking content w/o edit summaries. Also violating WP:BLP. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7CB9:F602:1A76:5300 ( talk) 03:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 20:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: High level of IP vandalism. Election related disruptive edits 112.201.223.226 ( talk) 03:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several IP's (likely the same user) blanking content w/o edit summaries. Also violating WP:BLP. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7CB9:F602:1A76:5300 ( talk) 03:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 20:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
22:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
10 May 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopper. Thomas.W talk 21:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: For more than two weeks, an IP keeps changing the infobox image to someone else (which needs a speedy deletion anyway, as it is blatantly mis-titled). They keep doing it about every three days. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 23:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
12:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent IP vandalism. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 12:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption quickly resumed not long after a 1 year semi-protection from vandalism. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. True CRaysball | #RaysUp 21:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: The article was indefinitely semi-protected by Dabomb87, who is now inactive. 78.146.140.77 ( talk) 17:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- It was indef protected prior to that by
Nlu who is partially active, Dabomb87 only move protected it for one day.
tutterMouse (
talk)
17:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Even still I think that it should be unprotected now.
78.146.140.77 (
talk)
18:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please try contacting
Nlu (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) first, as they were the original protecting admin and they still appear to be semi-active. If you do not receive a response in a few days, please request here and the semiprotection can be removed. Thanks,
Nakon
22:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strongly suggest leaving this in place. We have a Nickelodeon vandal who we've had to rangeblock multiple times, and unprotection gives him another target. Katie talk 13:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined No reason given for unprotecting, and the vandalism threat is real (see above).
Lectonar (
talk)
07:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please try contacting
Nlu (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) first, as they were the original protecting admin and they still appear to be semi-active. If you do not receive a response in a few days, please request here and the semiprotection can be removed. Thanks,
Nakon
22:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Even still I think that it should be unprotected now.
78.146.140.77 (
talk)
18:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: No longer high-visibility (<1k pages as of now), due to deprecation and removal from most pages. No need for template protection. Pinging Ruud Koot, the protecting administrator. ~ Rob Talk 11:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Shouldn't it stay protected for the same reason it was deprecated instead of deleted: its use on old page revisions? —
Ruud
11:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- To protect against what? Vandalism of old revisions?
Izkala (
talk)
12:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Basically, yes. Once completely deprecated, people will stop keeping it on their watchlist and their shouldn't really be a reason to edit it anymore, either. —
Ruud
14:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- All right. I don't think that's seriously a threat. Izkala ( talk) 14:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined (procedural)
Lectonar (
talk)
07:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Basically, yes. Once completely deprecated, people will stop keeping it on their watchlist and their shouldn't really be a reason to edit it anymore, either. —
Ruud
14:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- To protect against what? Vandalism of old revisions?
Izkala (
talk)
12:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Recommend full protection of this article, to encourage discussion their & end the editing disputes. GoodDay ( talk) 12:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Katie
talk
13:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Katie—it was brought up there and turned down, because it involves Eric Corbett.
Curly Turkey 🍁
¡gobble!
01:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined I see the AN3 report now and it was turned down because it was stale, not because it had to do with one particular user. I want to hold on protecting it for now because the back-and-forth seems to have stopped, but I promise you I have no qualms about either locking the page or blocking the lot of you if you all don't cut it out.
Katie
talk
05:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Katie—it was brought up there and turned down, because it involves Eric Corbett.
Curly Turkey 🍁
¡gobble!
01:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! ( talk) 04:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 05:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Last unblock request rejected by a checkuser who identified the account as a sockpuppet. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 06:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continue to vandalize. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7D64:C068:23DC:B8BD ( talk) 02:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7D64:C068:23DC:B8BD ( talk) 04:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, I only see two bad edits from the same IP yesterday and nothing else last week.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent editing by blocked editor using multiple sockpuppets. ElKevbo ( talk) 00:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Bbb23 for 2 weeks.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued long-term IP vandalism.-- Brianann MacAmhlaidh ( talk) 00:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
02:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7D64:C068:23DC:B8BD ( talk) 04:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Widr for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – To prevent further page move vandalism. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs | ✉) 14:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Created only once.
Widr (
talk)
18:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent edit warring, blanking of content. One IP already blocked, article protected, and this is continuing from a registered account. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 14:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
18:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 16:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018 talk 19:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
11 May 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of statistics section by user with varying IP addresses. VG31-irl 15:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors cannot keep up with vandals: errors creeping into page. Suggest 1 week semi-protection. — hike395 ( talk) 15:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
15:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This seems to be the prime target for vandals after her bio was protected after this incident. Azealia911 talk 17:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is persistent but not terribly frequent.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 17:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent long term vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Most of the last 100 edits dating since February have been vandalism and subsequent reversions.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
04:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- A lot of the edits are vandalism. But the most recent edits could perhaps be better described as an edit war between IPs.
Your edit here actually broke the use of {{
Infobox musical artist}} as a module within {{
Infobox person}}.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- That edit was a mistake, which I came to realize well after the fact. It looked to me like much of the activity there was otherwise intentionally disruptive. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- A lot of the edits are vandalism. But the most recent edits could perhaps be better described as an edit war between IPs.
Your edit here actually broke the use of {{
Infobox musical artist}} as a module within {{
Infobox person}}.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Most of the last 100 edits dating since February have been vandalism and subsequent reversions.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
04:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 14:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive amount of vandalism from throwaway accounts. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- As an aside this might have something to do with the recent vandalism: [23] RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of recent vandalism and BLP violations in the month of May. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 16:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – past protection lifted, IP vandalism still occuring. Garchy ( talk) 16:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Another online spat. As is evident from the Talk page some fans of One Direction appear to be intend on disrupting this page. Requesting full protection. Karst ( talk) 11:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined The page is currently semi-protected, and I think that is sufficient at the moment. Two autoconfirmed users (each with fewer than 50 edits) have vandalised the article recently, but they have been warned and they have not vandalised since their last warning. If they vandalise again, most admins would happily block them if reported to
WP:AIV.
- If a few more autoconfirmed accounts turn up, vandalising, I think blocking is still preferable to increasing the protection level. Only if the problem is persisent would I think that increasing the protection level was appropriate.
- Yaris678 ( talk) 11:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 15:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 15:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Katie
talk
15:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, addition of unsourced content. – Sabbatino ( talk) 12:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 14:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 14:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 14:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been protected multiple times because of repeated disruption (IPs claiming that a madrasa in Egypt was the first university, even though madrasas don't fit the mainstream definition of university, and multiple discussions on multiple articles all establishing a clear consensus the madras aren't universities, and never have been), with the most recent protection being a six-month semi-protection that expired yesterday. And the IPs are already back, making the same old disruptive edits. So could we please have at least another six months?. Thomas.W talk 15:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs still changing her husband's name to "Ed", against sources. McGeddon ( talk) 08:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
08:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent critic of the LGBT agenda from a traditional Catholic perspective - and a persistent critic of the American church hierarchy. He's just "come out" as a past homosexual. This has given us a high level of IP vandalism - all of the WP:BLP violations are from anonymous IPs. Semi Protection for one month (with the option to expand it if it hasn't died down) should let this cool down. Posted a similar request to the BLP Noticeboard - although there's been no response so I don't think I'm forum shopping. JASpencer ( talk) 09:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
09:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia user Paralegal75 is requesting access to update the article Death of Kendrick Johnson. I have newly obtained official case documents and court documents I would like to link on the page to update it to reflect the current status of the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:32D1:9D00:9942:B794:8FE2:7A87 ( talk) 03:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Please comment on the article's talk page regarding this new information. Edits will not be made to the article from this page.
Nakon
03:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous addition of unsourced episode titles. Alex|The|Whovian ? 15:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Peter Sam Fan 19:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
02:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
02:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 21:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please see article history. GAB Hello! 22:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
03:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Not done this before, don't even have a Wiki account. Something very odd is happening on Wikipedia regarding what seems to be some kind of super fan or maybe a rogue talent agent for minor celebrities. Someone keeps changing actor's and other minor celebrities personal information, especially their age or children's names. Brett Davern is in his 30s and married, Molly Tarlov is also around 30 and there are others. A lot seem to be mobile edits. The info that's being changed also seems to be being changed elsewhere on the internet but is easily sourced e.g Brett Davern was in a film in 2006 as an adult yet the edit keeps making him a 13yr old boy at that time. No idea how to solve it, not even sure why I care :) 213.105.164.17 ( talk) 23:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued vandalism after recent release from protection period. Persistent sockpuppetry and/or block evasion. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:9C58:DF20:5AA2:5948 ( talk) 00:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Sock has been blocked by
Materialscientist (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
Nakon
03:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 00:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 00:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by mostly one IP address (who has been blocked), but other vandalism by IP addresses has come up. WP:BLP violations. Indy beetle ( talk) 23:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: For a long time vandalised or otherwise interfered with every few days, probably by school kids bored with 'ancient' history. Lets's see whether temporary semi-protection works. . Wikiain ( talk) 00:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a group of numerous IPs. Katniss ♥ 00:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 ( talk) 01:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
02:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:7D64:C068:23DC:B8BD ( talk) 02:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism of official Date of Birth by IPs and a new user who is not familiar with Korean actors and entertainment industry but reverted the edit without checked the reversion history of the page and the Korean Wikipedia of said actress. -- Vanca92 ( talk) 08:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The last round of semi-protection expired four days ago, and the sockpuppetry immediately resumed with edits like this one. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For a while, an IP has been constantly removing information on this article. The IP also constantly makes the article look NON-encyclopedic. I keep reverting the IP's edits but he/she keeps making the same edits over and over again. EuropeanSwedenAmerican2222 ( talk) 23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
02:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Should also salt Anjali Yadav. Wgolf ( talk) 03:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.,
Anjali Yadav create-protected 3 years as well.
Nakon
03:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is being subjected to repeated disruptive editing by editors using IP addresses; within the last couple of days, an IP editor has edit warred to restore uncited information while making no attempts to discuss on the talk page. This is on top of much past disruption at the article. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 04:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent violations of the biographies of living persons policy and vandalism. As Bongbong Marcos is a candidate for Vice President in the Philippines, suggest protection for at least 1 week as the vote counting process is still ongoing for the elections in the Philippines. Vic2426 ( talk) 06:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 19:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – "Atomic Meltdown" is back socking, yet again. Nymf ( talk) 19:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Ponyo.
Nakon
02:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:F8B:FE2:0:4B:2A34:1401 ( talk) 21:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 ( talk) 22:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Medium-term semi-protection: This article is under pending revisions, but that doesn;t stop a particualrly persistent IP editor, using multiple IPs (basically all the IPs you see on the first page of the history are this person) from attemtping to add the same material to the article, which has been rejected by numerous editors. It really needs to be semi'd for a considerable time, perhaps a couple of months, to stop this person's cycle. BMK ( talk) 23:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Seconded (only because BMK beat me to it
). Disruptive editing is ongoing and by an IP jumper, so a block is ineffective. 🖖
ATinySliver/
ATalkPage
23:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC) -
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WP:BLP violations. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:C431:9498:E92A:558A ( talk) 23:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 00:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Movie is set to release on July 22, 2016, which may be a reasonable time for any protect to expire to permit IPs who have viewed the movie to update the article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 01:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Expires automatically on 22 July, 2016.
Nakon
02:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unverifiable, poorly sourced information. Long-term disruptive editing on this page. livelikemusic talk! 01:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to recent award win. Melcous ( talk) 10:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 10:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- The transfer from Benfica to Bayern is not a rumour anymore. Reason to lock the page: disruptive editing by IPs since January 2016. SLBedit ( talk) 13:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's taking too long already. Ongoing disruptive editing. SLBedit ( talk) 15:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Message to admins: Please semi-protect this until 1 July, which is when the transfer goes through. Too often in cases like this, we get a day to a week of semi-protection, then it starts over again. Save yourselves from coming back infinite times and lock it until 1 July. '''tAD''' ( talk) 19:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Expires 1 July, 2016
Nakon
02:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Confirmed transer for summer, editors adding it right away... Kante4 ( talk) 11:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The BLP violations picked right back up with the end of the previous protection. MarnetteD| Talk 15:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Kautilya3 ( talk) 19:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
RegentsPark.
Nakon
02:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – While I personally find protecting Talk pages abhorrent, would an uninvolved admin please take care of the technical enforcement of the discretionary sanction imposed by Zad68 and listed at WP:DSLOG?. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 21:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Zad68:, would this page be covered under the Extended Confirmed protection requirement? Thanks, Nakon 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- That page isn't mentioned at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive173#TheRedPenOfDoom, third filing. Is it mentioned elsewhere, in relation to this type of protection?
- I think we should apply common sense - i.e. apply that level of protection to that GG-related page if the history warrants it.
- I don't think the history does warrant it at the moment. There are two edits that have been reverted, ostensibly because the user doesn't qualify for 30/500. But I think the bigger issue with those edits is that they are off topic. Two off-topic edits don't justify applying this level of protection.
- So we are back to my original question: Is 30/500 protection of the meta page mentioned anywhere?
-
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I spent the last 30 minutes looking and I can't find any mention of the Meta page being subject to AE. You could make the argument that it qualifies for 30/500 as a subpage, but I don't think the decision to protect pages that are for discussion about discussion about a topic under sanctions should be made here. I think it should go to
ARCA for clarification.
Katie
talk
14:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm perfectly comfortable with deciding here whether or not to apply this protection to this page. Going to ARCA seems pointlessly bureaucratic. As you said, protecting a meta page is not explicitly called for, but you could make the argument that it could be included. We can decide that argument, based on whether or not it would help the encyclopedia. The page has had few edits by newish users and has never been subject to sustained attack by throw-away accounts. The two off-topic edits were easily dealt with by reverting them. Having an unnecesary level of protection would prevent this page from being edited by good-faith newish users who may have something valuable to add to the meta discussion. Therefore, it is in the interest of the encyclopedia to not apply that protection unless the page does suffer seriously from off-topic comments by throw-away accounts.
- Yaris678 ( talk) 17:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Let's use common sense here; if it gets worse, this can aways be protected, but protecting talk-pages should be the last resort.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have noted this by changing the text at the top of the meta page. Yaris678 ( talk) 11:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- I spent the last 30 minutes looking and I can't find any mention of the Meta page being subject to AE. You could make the argument that it qualifies for 30/500 as a subpage, but I don't think the decision to protect pages that are for discussion about discussion about a topic under sanctions should be made here. I think it should go to
ARCA for clarification.
Katie
talk
14:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Article is not a template so it uses the wrong protection level. Flow234 ( talk) 09:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- The main purpose of the page is to transclude a page from portal space. It also has some odd template code (the nowiki inside the {{
info}} template) that I (an admin) don't fully understand. I think letting template editors edit this makes sense. Happy to listen to alternative views though.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected From what I can see on the documentation for
WP:TPE, template editor protection is not valid in the WP namespace.
Nakon
02:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing IP attempts to add Pixar to the list of studios. Richfife ( talk) 22:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptively semi-protecting against vandalism from non-autoconfirmed users. Deus vult! Crusadestudent ( talk) 10:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Admins are not Tom Cruise.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
10:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
12 May 2016
- Louise Burns (child actress) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Lisa Burns ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection These have already been speedy deleted a few times. They do not meet WP:GNG as their only notability was appearing in the 1980 Kubricjk film The Shining. It should be noted that were created with lower case letters a couple times so you may only see one or two creations under the links I have posted. MarnetteD| Talk 14:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm the one who tagged these for speedy deletion this time and I agree with MarnetteD's assessment of notability, though the articles themselves say that they retired from acting and otherwise only starred in one episode of a television series. Salting would be a good idea because the article creator has been very persistent in recreating the pages as they did for
Katy Towell.
Opencooper (
talk)
14:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- An editor contested the speedy deletions so looks like this will have to be salted at AFD. Opencooper ( talk) 15:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined We'll let the AfD play out —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. Pages have been speedy deleted
CSD G5 and salted by User:Ponyo.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
19:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Socks by banned user Vote X for change. Favonian has been unbelievably quick at reverting and for that I offer my sincere thank you. Aloha27 talk 19:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:512E:6290:9161:703B ( talk) 03:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Blatant advert created four times in eight months. — swpb T 14:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated drive by vandalism by IPs after team lost a playoff series. Will probably die down in a few days but in short term is a nuisance. Echoedmyron ( talk) 17:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. JorisvS ( talk) 17:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been recreated under Jodense Valenciano (singer) and Jodense Valenciano (actor) as well-so I think all 3 should be salted if this gets deleted again. . Wgolf ( talk) 22:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I just put a AFD on this article BTW-was not sure what type of deletion to give it. Wgolf ( talk) 22:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done per the same request on my talk page.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
17:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MotorbikeIsAMostCommonWord ( talk) 22:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP keeps adding independent shows to the tour to increase revenue numbers, when it ended in 2015. Then, posts 3RR in my talk page, when it was my first edit there. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 23:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing from anonymous editors, who refuse to stick to the source, and add-in unverifiable information that contradicts source(s) within the article. livelikemusic talk! 00:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Also, please RevDel [24] and [25]. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 00:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rev-deleted handled by others.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
18:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 01:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please also create-protect Tom Stokes (capital 'S'). 2601:1C0:4901:2191:A868:4C49:DC23:83FC ( talk) 01:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
17:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP edit warring for three days. They keep introducing content which is not relevant to the lead. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 01:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reluctantly, there are good edits coming in via PC, but the edit rate is a bit high right now, in my opinion —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and new account vandalism. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 13:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
14:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Questionable and outdated edits. MotorbikeIsAMostCommonWord ( talk) 22:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Person SOCKing to replace sourced temp data with unsourced data. Master and one sock blocked. SPI open on third account at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joha884488. Person has said "You can block me all you want, I don't care. I'm doing this to prove a point"
[26]. So this is not going to end. Most recent sock
Users33 made same edit again today
[27].
Jbh
Talk
11:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
14:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Interstate Highway Unprotection
- Control city ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Pershing Map ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal Aid Highway Act of 1921 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1944 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1952 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Federal-Aid Highway Amendments of 1974 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of structures built on top of freeways ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- National Highway System (United States) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Francis Turner (engineer) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- George Parks Highway ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Iron Pipeline ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of highways bypassed by Interstate Highways ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Temporary Interstate Highways ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate H-2 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 24 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 26 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 35E (Texas) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 35W (Texas) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Unprotect the following articles in Category:Interstate Highway System due to little to no vandalism on these pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:181:e800:534:f71d:ed31:3016 ( talk)
- Not unprotected – Please create a
sourced version of this article in a
subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any
administrator to move the page for you.- Most, if not all, of these articles are bulk protected until an edit filter is developed and tested to protect against LTA Link Smurf, who has proven adept at block evasion and IP hopping, and even defeating existing edit filters. I left a message on the requester's talk page, requesting more information. The requester responded in short order, but the requested information was not provided, only the request to unprotect was repeated.
Dave (
talk)
04:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Interstate Highway Pending changes
- Interstate 15 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 19 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 8 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 20 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 27 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 29 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 37 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 41 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Interstate 44 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending Changes: The listed interstate articles here need Pending Changes because they have more vandalism to need protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:181:e800:534:f71d:ed31:3016 ( talk)
- Not unprotected – Please create a
sourced version of this article in a
subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any
administrator to move the page for you. Most, if not all, of these articles are bulk protected until an edit filter is developed and tested to protect against LTA Link Smurf, who has proven adept at block evasion and IP hopping, and even defeating existing edit filters. I left a message on the requester's talk page, requesting more information. The requester responded in short order, but the requested information was not provided, only the request unprotect was repeated.
Dave (
talk)
04:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Der
yck C.
08:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. WP article about an NFL player that has been rumored to retire tomorrow. IP users not willing to wait for an official retirement announcement. HENDAWG229 ( talk) 03:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Not highly visible. Laber□ T 07:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done The point of this is? There has been no disruption and moreover all editnotices are already template-protected via the title blacklist.
BethNaught (
talk)
07:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 04:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 05:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – various editors insisting that this be redirected to an article without discussion. I suspect sock puppetry. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject has signed an agreement with a club, but not a contract and it will not take effect until 1 July. Anonymous editors are ignoring the hidden comment and so a lock until 1 July (UTC) should be enough to avoid this problem. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
06:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry/block evasion. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:A868:4C49:DC23:83FC ( talk) 01:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death hoax. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 04:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC
-
Semi-protected by Casliber for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Edit request since article and talk page semi-protected Please change the infobox parameter "|incumbent=" from Barack Obama to Mitt Romney -- Obama is not the Republican nominee incumbent, Romney is. anon 01:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Dave (
talk)
05:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – The only edits in the past month have been IPs and new accounts claiming that this minor royal's husband's first name is actually Ed (part of a possible hoax related to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ed_Banayoti). Article gets barely any edits otherwise - twenty last year, only ten or so per previous years. Requested semi-protection which was declined, but I think this needs pending changes if all it's getting currently is misinformation. McGeddon ( talk) 18:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 19:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Favonian (
talk ·
contribs).
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Under heavy attack from an IP- and account-hopping vandal who is alternating between inserting gibberish and inserting racist gibberish. RunnyAmiga ( talk) 23:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
01:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dozens of acts of vandalism by multiple IP's have had to be undone today by multiple editors. . Scr★pIron IV 18:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of recent BLP-related IP vandalism. Chubbles ( talk) 19:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An editor refuses to cease edit-warring on this page, and has been warned multiple times by multiple editors. Please undo their last change (if there is one at the time of protection) and fully protect the page temporarily. In the meantime, I will likely begin an SPI on these accounts, since it appears to be one editor originating from multiple addresses. Thank you. GoneIn60 ( talk) 21:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm just dropping in here to say that the user in question, User:Ridelover71504, has just been blocked for a week for edit warring. Since that's (apparently) this person's only non-anon account, maybe semi-protection instead of full would be ideal. RunnyAmiga ( talk) 22:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block-evading sock resuming edits on the day that the previous block expired. McGeddon ( talk) 21:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
13 May 2016
Semi-protection: Mobile IP editors are corrupting the redirect every few weeks or so, not sure why. Something similar happened at the target 48, XXXX until it was protected. 15.211.201.92 ( talk) 00:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The level of disruption is not even high enough for pending changes protection, let alone semi-protection. I have watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary or Permanent semi-protection: Constant vandalism by a barrage of IP addresses (since forever). More than four-fifths (by what I see) of the article editing traffic is vandalism. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 13:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, pending changes are doing just fine, and some of the IP edits are constructive.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are edit warring over the content - No point reporting them as they'd come back under a new one - I hope if it gets protected they'd then go to the talkpage, Thanks,. – Davey2010 Talk 19:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. With a request to discuss the issues on the talk page.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
19:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Malcolm, Lets hope they get the hint this time!
, Cheers, –
Davey2010
Talk
19:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Malcolm, Lets hope they get the hint this time!
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AjayTO ( talk) 20:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 20:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AjayTO ( talk) 20:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DPM 22:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Far from all IP-edits are vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix ( talk) 00:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP-hopping edit warrior removing properly cited material with no discussion, despite numerous invitations and warnings. William Thweatt Talk Contribs 09:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. I don't see ip-hopping in the last days.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs repeatedly adding unsourced, non-notable and very dubious names to lists of models represented by Storm. Thomas.W talk 14:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Endless edit warring. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 16:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. This is between you and an IP; better to get some more eyes on this....
Lectonar (
talk)
09:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Constant vandalism of statistics section by user with varying IP addresses. VG31-irl 11:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Linguist111 Please respond on the current page. Unless on my talk page, please ping me (type {{SUBST:ping|Linguist111}}) 14:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A recently blocked user seems to be IP hopping to add contentious material. Dbrodbeck ( talk) 15:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. EuropeanSwedenAmerican2222 ( talk) 01:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A bit nutty IP inserting BLP violating material, removing sourced material (for same reason) on a BLP article. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 03:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, this is just one IP. I now warned them. If they restart edit-warring anytime soon, ping me or any other administrator.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three vandal edits in a day. Temporary protection may help. jojo@nthony ( talk) 09:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Peacemaker67.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism. SvEcHpInXID ( talk) 10:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page was under pending changes protection before it was expired. Need a protection until September. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 02:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There are good IP edits, though infrequent, and therefore I restored pending changes.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nickag989 ( talk to me!) 08:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editors are adding incorrect information about race titles and the series title sponsor. Vandalism is likely to continue for several months. – Nascar1996 ( talk • cont) 01:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Short-term full protection. One editor is editwarring against at least two others to keep inserting brow-beating verbiage about the spelling with a comma in it, after not getting his way at a recent WP:RM at same article. This needs to be resolved in talk, not with tendentiousness and revtalk. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism falsely reporting death. -- Cheesemeister ( talk) 04:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
06:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:A868:4C49:DC23:83FC ( talk) 01:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems that there are two edit protections on this page, shouldn't it be just semi?. Laber□ T 18:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done It doesn't matter that much, but I took out the pending changes.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection and pending changes: Same problem with vandalism of statistics section. VG31-irl 19:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by MelanieN for 5 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
05:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 18:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Apart from that not enough vandalism to warrant even pc protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: Endless edit warring in the middle of an RFC. Number 5 7 19:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined It's not that bad at the moment...Let's see if the RfC can play out. Please relist if it get's worse.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – After dropping the hyphen (-), the template is unprotected, while the redirect with the hyphen is protected. George Ho ( talk) 20:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
23:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of good faith but disruptive editing against consensus not to update the infobox until after season ends. Season ends on Sunday, so semi until Monday morning would suffice. Joseph2302 ( talk) 07:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined PC seems sufficient —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. -- 188.32.111.138 ( talk) 12:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – User talk pages
are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018 talk 16:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of newbie vandalism. User has been spamming large off-topic rant on various pages. Avoiding talk page discussion [28]. Soupforone ( talk) 17:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Try discussing with them on their talk page, where they will get a notification. If edit warring persists, consider
WP:ANEW —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
14 May 2016
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 20:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
21:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 50 edits by 26 users in the past 24 days, and basically no improvements to the article (see [29]). . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 20:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
21:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Page has 35000+ transclusions. (Does not warrant full protection, not at the 100000 high-risk mark). — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 21:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reason as King's Quest (2015 video game) earlier. Multiple IPs adding unsourced claims that the developer stole money. -- ferret ( talk) 20:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – or renew pending changes. I see some people not getting used to a Star Wars sequel made by Disney. Other reverted edits are just random comments or poor changes. George Ho ( talk) 20:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many of edits were lewd insults on the subject. Some were unsourced additions. And I don't think PC is effective, given high frequency of editing. George Ho ( talk) 20:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent IP vandalism; I'm not even sure I reverted to the correct version.Erpert blah, blah, blah... 15:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
19:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I could not tell whether the edits were vandalism. However, anonymous users apparently could not either grasp the subject or just scuffled by the nature of the subject. Also, the PC could not hold down a growing frequency of editing. Sometimes, anonymous users may blank the content or replace a valuable content with something distasteful. But if that's not the case, extend pending changes instead. George Ho ( talk) 16:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
18:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Even with low frequent editing, according to records, random students vandalized the article by blanking out some content, but that occurred almost last week. Almost two months ago, random people made random comments nearly unrelated to the subject. George Ho ( talk) 16:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
18:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term block-evading IP-hopper adding WP:SYN to critical acclaim section. IPs used include
- 166.170.34.148 ( talk · contribs)
- 166.170.33.165 ( talk · contribs)
- 73.81.144.205 ( talk · contribs)
- 87.21.226.108 ( talk · contribs)
- 175.156.224.187 ( talk · contribs)
- 175.156.53.191 ( talk · contribs)
- 87.21.209.34 ( talk · contribs)
- 138.75.179.235 ( talk · contribs)
- 86.110.155.87 ( talk · contribs)
- 104.231.81.183 ( talk · contribs)
- 2604:2000:1303:d4:a09b:229:f710:b2f4 ( talk · contribs)
- 86.110.155.87 ( talk · contribs)
- ...
These all appear to be the IP versions of Smoore95GAGA ( talk · contribs) and its now-blocked sock MoonlightMusician ( talk · contribs) as evidenced here.
Several blocks handed out but whack-a-mole isn't working, nor is the talk page. Toddst1 ( talk) 18:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 19:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
19:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Once the semi-protection expired, IPs started to edit again, ruining the page. Request for permanent semi-protection. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 19:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
19:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Semiprotection doesn't seem to be enough to stop the list from being selectively updated. As said in the editnotice, all dislike counters must be updated at the same time. The majority of the recent edits have been only on a few of the videos. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 01:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The logo keeps on being changed to the english version from the arabic version. Igotrekt ( talk) 08:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- The dispute seems to be between mostly IP users but also it seems to mostly maintained by IP users too so semi-protection or PC might be enough.
tutterMouse (
talk)
10:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruptive editing by ip hopper (death toll changes), back to previous activity after recent page protection expiry... Baking Soda ( talk) 08:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Stang 14:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP has been trying to put trivial information into the article through edit warring. T v x1 14:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Måns Zelmerlöw ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Temporary protection - IP vandalism starting as usual before Eurovision 2016 final.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 16:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs inserting an unsourced accusation of the developer stealing money, while blanking or vandalizing other sections of the page. -- ferret ( talk) 17:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
17:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – More unsourced IP/SPA edits about her husband being called "Ed" and them divorcing a few months after marriage. McGeddon ( talk) 18:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Pending changes is not sufficient to stop recent rash of nonsense edits by various IPs, some of which are derogatory to other people, if it is even possible to understand non-standard vernacular being used. . Geraldo Perez ( talk) 14:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Death hoaxes, same person uses multiple ISPs so highly dynamic IPs. Resumed immediately after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 15:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
15:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi protection: IP user removed material in complete disreguard of WP:NOTCENSORED. IP have been blocked, I wanted to be long-term, so that never ocurrs again. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 02:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Another IP has been instituting the same edits- semi-protection seems like a necessity here. PeterTheFourth ( talk) 02:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Doug Weller for 1 month.
tutterMouse (
talk)
09:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – High-use (not high-risk), but page has 10100+ transclusions. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 08:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. by
Mr. Stradivarius. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
09:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: - per IP vandalism that will be increased tonight for the final of ESC. BabbaQ ( talk) 09:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: COI editors vandalizing page. BeaverTails18 ( talk) 01:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- This editor needs to be blocked. See their contributions and the behaviour at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nader Nadernejad and at Nader Nadernejad AusLondonder ( talk) 01:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- This editor, for the record, is attempting to forestall a still-in-progress AFD discussion by unilaterally declaring it closed under the false pretense that it the nomination was withdrawn by the nominator (who would be me, so I know very well whether the nominator withdrew it or not), and the "vandalism" they're trying to report is the restoration of the AFD template to the article — where process requires it to remain until the discussion is properly closed by someone with the authority to close it. I've already protected the page, although full admin-only for the moment. Bearcat ( talk) 01:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done This is a bad faith request for protection, part of an effort to disrupt the AfD discussion. I have given BeaverTails18 a warning that I will block them if they resume this disruptive behaviour.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
02:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Full temp: Ongoing edit war by Dirroli ( talk · contribs) in regards to citation to primary sources. User has been reported to WP:AN3 in regards to this but keeps warring obliviously along. Please restore to version 720126902 if he restores his disputed edits before an action has been taken regards to this. Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 03:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected by Slakr for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
04:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs have been having a little too much fun on this article in the past couple of days. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 06:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Edit request since article and talk page under 30/500 protection Please add the infobox parameter "|demonym=" Palestinian as listed in List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations Turbolent2 ( talk) 05:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued vandalism after recent release from protection period. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:F0D0:64DF:7F42:8C66 ( talk) 02:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Long-standing and ongoing problem with persumed lone editor using multiple IPs to add joke nicknames and creating BLP issues. Request resumption of semi-protection. UW Dawgs ( talk) 16:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by shifting IP with an axe to grind. No doubt also block evasion DVdm ( talk) 20:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's not my fault my ISP keeps changing my IP. Why would I change it myself every few minutes? Also, I'm allowed to post sources. Nothing wrong with that. That's not vandalism. Ip shifting doesn't mean I'm avoiding block, especially when the edit you reverted is a constructive post of 3 sources previously unknown on the topic. You and everybody else can disagree with what the sources say and with my conclusion, but you can't delete my post because of that.
141.138.22.91 (
talk)
21:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- It clearly is vandalism, per the warning on top of the talk page. -
DVdm (
talk)
21:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Which warning?
141.138.22.91 (
talk)
21:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- No further comment. -
DVdm (
talk)
21:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then I really don't have to explain myself for posting sources. You should explain yourself for deleting sources and asking for a page protection because someone had posted sources. What would happen if I now went and found a completely unrelated page where an IP had posted a source and delete his comment and ask for page protection. For instance this topic of mine. 141.138.22.91 ( talk) 21:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- No further comment. -
DVdm (
talk)
21:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Which warning?
141.138.22.91 (
talk)
21:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- It clearly is vandalism, per the warning on top of the talk page. -
DVdm (
talk)
21:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's not my fault my ISP keeps changing my IP. Why would I change it myself every few minutes? Also, I'm allowed to post sources. Nothing wrong with that. That's not vandalism. Ip shifting doesn't mean I'm avoiding block, especially when the edit you reverted is a constructive post of 3 sources previously unknown on the topic. You and everybody else can disagree with what the sources say and with my conclusion, but you can't delete my post because of that.
141.138.22.91 (
talk)
21:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you want to see what's vandalism, just scroll up this page and look for what kind of edits page protection is usually asked for. For instance and act of vandalism is deleting someone's sources without an explanation. If I now went to do that to someone else I would be reported and promptly banned, but here we have you asking a page protection against. I should ask the page be protected from you because your acts are acts of vandalism. Deleting perfectly valid comments is an act of vandalism. And when I ask you to explain to why are you doing that to avoid edit warring you delete my comment from your talk page. Well I have stopped reverting you anyways, because I don't want to vandalize the page reverting your vandalism. 141.138.22.91 ( talk) 22:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. However, IP should use links rather than long quotes.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Was blocked indefinitely. Dr. Neurosis ( talk) 14:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined User talk page access has already been revoked and there is no recent other activity on that page.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
19:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Full unprotection. Template has been redirected per old TFD discussion to {{ Uw-delete3}}. Page has only 1 single transclusion. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 01:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Full unprotection. Template has been redirected to {{ Uw-test3}} per very old TfD discussion. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 01:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Was blocked indefinitely. Dr. Neurosis ( talk) 14:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined User talk page access has already been revoked and there is no recent other activity on that page.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
19:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Full unprotection. Template has been redirected per old TFD discussion to {{ Uw-delete3}}. Page has only 1 single transclusion. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 01:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Full unprotection. Template has been redirected to {{ Uw-test3}} per very old TfD discussion. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 01:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection Constant IP vandalism. Page has been protected for same previously. TomCat4680 ( talk) 16:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, with a lot of editors adding genres to the song without a reliable source. I carefully created the whole article, adding genres that are sourced, which are tropical and dancehall, but other editors continue to add latin and latin house without a source, and even after requesting to add only if they have sources to confirm, they keep adding without them. FanofPopMusic ( talk) 18:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued persistent edit warring, over the fact that some unknown user is deleting the 'Awards Disestablished in 2014' category, when they were. There has not been such a ceremony since 2014. 2601:601:4002:E260:10A6:9E55:A6C7:46E ( talk) 19:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to transfer stories in the media. JMHamo ( talk) 20:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor keeps blanking sections of the page (after warnings), and I suspect they are a registered user editing while logged out. Random86 ( talk) 20:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Occasional vandalism over the last week or so by one or more IP editors. Diffs: [30] [31] [32] [33]. Sammy1339 ( talk) 20:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism... ip user remove valid sources. It should be locked for ip users.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 22:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Funny, if you look one thread above, I have the same problem with an user who is removing the sources I had posted to talk page of one article and he is actually asking for a protection so his vandalism can persist. So I guess IP's are guilty every way you look at it. If they post a source and revert a vandalism who deletes them or if doing an act of vandalism themselves and deleting a source. 141.138.22.91 ( talk) 22:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of actiivity by banned editor HarveyCarter using IP socks. BMK ( talk) 23:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 22 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix ( talk) 23:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeek, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Finale just took place. Poor edits and vandalism have been running wild and don't seem to be slowing down. G loss 01:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – the user causing the disruption really should be blocked, but has been editing offline as well, so maybe worth protecting the page?. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 08:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: This article is subject to Arbitration enforcement and 1RR at present there is a slow edit war taking place, protection will help the talks which are goin on the talk page as numerous dormant accounts and SPP accounts have appeared. . Mo ainm ~Talk 13:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring from an IP editor about Agnieszka Radwańska's "unofficial" score, that I put the real score from the WTA official website. ApprenticeFan work 15:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection Constant IP vandalism. Page has been protected for same previously. TomCat4680 ( talk) 16:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. VG31-irl 19:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
22:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 21:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
23:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
full protection, named person of which article is about, does not want their name existing on Wiki. See here TomJohnson107 ( talk) 19:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely. Page has been speedy deleted CSD G7 and salted.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
19:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
15 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow, persistent non-constructive editing by ips. Onel5969 TT me 18:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IPs and SPA edit warring an unsourced and apparently incorrect change in number of party members against talk page consensus. See Talk:Libertarian Party (United_States)#.221.5_million.22 Meters ( talk) 18:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 18:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A lot of vandalism over the past two months by multiple accounts. . . Mean as custard ( talk) 09:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Omni Flames let's talk about it 10:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repetitive vandalism from IP addresses. Alza08 ( talk) 13:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Users are move warring on this article. Izno ( talk) 13:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 18:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury ( talk) 06:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Imrust, who is the subject's manager, has manipulated the article in favour of his client (clearly a conflict of interest), but keeps removing the COI tag while editing through various IP addresses. Kailash29792 ( talk) 07:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – After the move, the protection shifted to a redirect, while this template is unprotected. George Ho ( talk) 08:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 08:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: - IP vandalism as expected for Eurovision final.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 01:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP keeps editing in that Rousseff is no longer President of Brazil. However, she still is President. GoodDay ( talk) 03:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
PS: IP 45.72.167.132 has promised to continue edit-warring & change computers to evades any blocks. GoodDay ( talk) 03:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
03:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Have you read the IP's? comment at his talkpage?
GoodDay (
talk)
03:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Based on this edit, I think this issue may now be resolved. Nakon 04:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Have you read the IP's? comment at his talkpage?
GoodDay (
talk)
03:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JohnMcButts ( talk) 22:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
22:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have warned them, but this user hops around on different IP's.
JohnMcButts (
talk)
23:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I only see one IP address editing the article this month.
Nakon
23:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you look at some of the previous edits by the various IP's in the page history, you will see that the edits are almost identical. They add new entries to the list with no sources, with no edit summery. The IP user never comments on talk pages, and never responds to warnings. They almost exclusively edit entry lists for Motorsports articles, and train articles (usually trains in the UK).
JohnMcButts (
talk)
23:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I just don't see enough disruption from other IP addresses this month to justify semiprotection. The IP in question could likely be blocked, and if they evade the block the page could be semiprotected, but at this point it's only one IP editing the article this month. Nakon 03:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you look at some of the previous edits by the various IP's in the page history, you will see that the edits are almost identical. They add new entries to the list with no sources, with no edit summery. The IP user never comments on talk pages, and never responds to warnings. They almost exclusively edit entry lists for Motorsports articles, and train articles (usually trains in the UK).
JohnMcButts (
talk)
23:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I only see one IP address editing the article this month.
Nakon
23:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have warned them, but this user hops around on different IP's.
JohnMcButts (
talk)
23:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It was already protected for 3 hours today, but vandalism already began as soon as protection ended. Please put a bigger one. Thanks Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 03:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Apologies for that, I assumed 3 hours would have been effective.
Nakon
03:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This page is currently indefinitely semi-protected and has been since March 2015. I'm taking it upon myself to expand this article but I feel that the protection should be reduced to pending changes level-2 in order to help me do so. This page has strong history of BLP vandalism and this could partly be because the subject in question is also a teacher at a high school. I think that the protection should be reduced so as to allow good-faith editors who are not a member of the community to add in information on the subject because it is quite hard to find sources for the man. I would personally review the changes to ensure that there is no BLP violations; this article has so much potential for expansion but I can only add in so much information. Pending changes would still suppress vandalism and deter it, but would also encourage helpful/constructive edits. Also, the protecting administrator is inactive so I can't approach them. They have been so since August 2015. st170e talk 00:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's my understanding that PC2 is not currently approved by the community, except for truly exceptional cases. I would be willing to downgrade the article to PC1 protection since the original protecting admin is not currently active on the project.
Nakon
03:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User:Nakon, I would be quite happy for PC1 to be invoked on this article in place of PC2 protection, it will still deter vandalism and encourage positive editing.
st170e
talk
03:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done I've removed the indefinite semiprotection for editing and have enabled PC1 protection for 3 months. The indefinite semi-moveprotection is still in effect. Thanks,
Nakon
03:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User:Nakon, I would be quite happy for PC1 to be invoked on this article in place of PC2 protection, it will still deter vandalism and encourage positive editing.
st170e
talk
03:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Full Protection: Persistent vandalism – deletion of material and true facts posted by Gkable the subject of the article. Reposted now and accepted by myself as a true account of the subject matter. High level of IP vandalism. Gkable ( talk) 22:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
22:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of vandalism and disruptive editing in recent days. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 23:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent petty vandalism by IPv6-hopper. Previous semi-protection was for one week and vandalism restarted soon after it expired. Requesting a month or longer this time. This article is very stable (as far as valid material goes) so a longer protection period will not be much inconvenience. Jeh ( talk) 23:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Trut-h-urts man ( T • C) 00:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of information, by both an IP and new editor, that violates BLP violations. livelikemusic talk! 00:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Don't want IPs and new users vandalizing my user page. Omni Flames let's talk about it 00:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP users. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 01:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamie Tubers ( talk) 02:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry from this particular editor as required protection of this page three times already. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry from this particular editor as required protection of this page twice already. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 02:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism by an IP. Philafrenzy ( talk) 07:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, this is just one IP, and they seem to have stopped after the last warning.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have just reverted them twice more.
Philafrenzy (
talk)
19:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Blocked for 31h for vandalism.
Nakon
19:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- I have just reverted them twice more.
Philafrenzy (
talk)
19:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I see PC as less effective to let some users accept unsourced additions that are later reverted. However, why not renew pending changes if the former request is too much. George Ho ( talk) 20:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined PCprotection is still on for a few days.
Widr (
talk)
20:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know whether most of the edits are attacks on the subject, but they are symptoms of vandalism. Alternatively, go for renew pending changes. George Ho ( talk) 20:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined PC protection is still on for a few days.
Widr (
talk)
20:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13( talk) 17:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
19:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor insists on removing parts of old talk page discussions. clpo13( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Disruption on the talk page appears to have ceased once warnings were issued to the user.
Nakon
19:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs keep adding false information, including format vandalism, about a move to England. Zwerg Nase ( talk) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: UFC PPV events are always victim of IP vandalism and this one has seen a few already today. I'd like to ask for protection before it gets ugly. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 23:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
23:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 12:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Nakon
18:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Stang 14:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, looks like content dispute to me.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism by an IP. -- Arius1988 ( talk) 15:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
18:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism/personal attacks from a hopping IP. Calidum ¤ 16:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked for 31hr.
Nakon
18:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Protection: Multi-editor edit war, it's being discussed on the talk page, but the edit war has peaked today (I'm involved too). Time to protect. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Protection: Edit warring by apparent IP-hopper Jim1138 ( talk) 03:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for nor reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection for one month. IP spamming a bunch of brand names into an article about a drug. Jytdog ( talk) 04:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, this is just one IP, and they seem to have stopped after warning. If disruption continues please ask again.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
16 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection for 2 weeks. IP editor trolling my talk page. Jytdog ( talk) 18:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
GB
fan
18:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent rash of IP edits blatantly violating WP:BLP and MOS:GENDERID. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 20:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Pending changes" is nice and all, but we still have to revert the IP vandalism done on the page anyway. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – My request for this page to be protected yesterday was declined, only to have the page be subjected to further vandalism in by the same blocked editor. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – My request for this page to be protected yesterday was declined, only to have the page be subjected to further vandalism in by the same blocked editor. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandal. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 14:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
15:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. — MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
17:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism/disruptive/BLP. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 12:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
14:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SwisterTwister and I have been edit warring with an IP-hopping user. He keeps restoring the list, saying we need to talk about it, and then doesn't talk. I think we need to protect this page until he moves on. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 12:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, cannot revert anymore due to 3RR limit. Hentheden ( talk) 13:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – User request... TJH2018 talk 14:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes is not possible for talk pages.
Widr (
talk)
14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We must again semi protect this page, IP activity with additions and removal of people is crazy. I propose long time now. Axiomus ( talk) 11:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
11:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Chaudhary Charan Singh Post Graduate College, Heonra-Saifai ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated cut-and-paste moves . Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going sockpuppetry by ipsock|SalemHanna. SummerPhD v2.0 12:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected. (ending changes applied by Nakon)
Katie
talk
13:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from various new users and IPs. -- Irn ( talk) 04:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
05:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Nothing constructive, nothing but vandalism in last 27 days (38 edits). This page is a perennial magnet for vandals, and a nuisance to keep clean. Protected many times before. Please protect lastingly: autoconfirmed users only. Hertz1888 ( talk) 04:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: almost positive the above user meant semiprotection. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
05:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 09:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP editors are adding rumors and transfer speculations. - Jaellee ( talk) 09:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Random86 ( talk) 09:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing sockpuppetry by SalemHanna sock Earosmus90. (Sock case awaiting action at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SalemHanna,alsousing numerous IPs. SummerPhD v2.0 21:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
05:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13( talk) 23:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
05:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors cannot keep up with vandalism --- junk information in article for months. Request at least 2 weeks of semi-protection, although more is welcome. — hike395 ( talk) 23:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Later --- the misinformation in the article has propagated out into the world. Frustrating. — hike395 ( talk) 00:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A majority of the last ten edits have been block evasion. Previous evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yes it's only two edits, but previous evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yes it's only two edits, but previous block evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing sockpuppetry by SalemHanna sock Earosmus90. (Sock case awaiting action at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SalemHanna,alsousing numerous IPs. SummerPhD v2.0 21:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
05:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13( talk) 23:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
05:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors cannot keep up with vandalism --- junk information in article for months. Request at least 2 weeks of semi-protection, although more is welcome. — hike395 ( talk) 23:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Later --- the misinformation in the article has propagated out into the world. Frustrating. — hike395 ( talk) 00:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A majority of the last ten edits have been block evasion. Previous evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yes it's only two edits, but previous evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yes it's only two edits, but previous block evasion and vandalism from the same editor have required this page to be protected twice before. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
05:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple cases of vandalism through the last few weeks. Saltedcake ( talk) 15:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP attempting to collapse part of a discussion. clpo13( talk) 16:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Late response, vandalism appears to be concluded.
Nakon
04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of dubious and unhelpful edits. The film was recently released, so this type of traffic is not unreasonable, a temporary semi-protection is appropriate. Jim Carter 20:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It was protected for a month previously, and IP editors are continuing to add incorrect/unsourced numbers of appearances to infobox. Joseph2302 ( talk) 07:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
07:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
08:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – same as before. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There is an IP-hopping editor who continues to be reverted by me and two other editors ( CurlyWi and IDV) for making the same edit every time: [34], which they've done 9 times in the past 2 days, and a handful of times a few days before that. 十 八 05:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
07:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Prone to vandalism. Throughout the recent months, IPs haven't added anything useful. Semi would be better than PC. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
07:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – {{ Lang-el}} was recently updated to use the template in question. Lang-el is already template-protected (with 16000+ transclusions). This backing template needs protection as well (transclusion count underway, but it will be at around 18000+). — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 20:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- A quick follow-up, the transclusion count has stopped at around 18300, which certainly makes this a High-risk template. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 01:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected
Nakon
05:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing sockpuppetry by SalemHanna sock Earosmus90. (Sock case awaiting action at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SalemHanna,alsousing numerous IPs. SummerPhD v2.0 21:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by globally locked editor. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 21:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced content to the article. livelikemusic talk! 22:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: This will inherently be an article that draws vandalism. I think that it's well justified given the context and sense of humor of most vandals; I just reverted an edit, which is why I am proposing semi-protection. Zia224 ( talk) 01:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 01:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS ( talk) 02:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Consistent edit warring over who won the Best Sci Fi Show; Outlander won, not the Walking Dead as StealthForce and a few other unknown users insist. 2601:601:4002:E260:5029:271:DF84:AEEB ( talk) 03:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
05:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Discussion is ongoing on the talk page, but I feel full protection is necessary to prompt development of consensus instead of edit warring. clpo13( talk) 15:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston.
Nakon
04:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: persistent insertion of unsourced and OR claims by former IP hopper (now likely registered as User:EruIluvatar3) with subsequent edit warring. Khruner ( talk) 15:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is some long-term edit warring between several IP editors, dating back to March 2016. This does not directly violate the 3-revert rule, but the page needs to be protected for a long time against edit warring. . epicgenius ( talk) 16:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism and disruptive editing from 2 different IP's. Lovkal ( talk) 17:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandal target. Maybe we could also put something in the Title blacklist and/or edit filter to prevent evasion. Feinoha Talk 00:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
00:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have noticed some vandalism in the past months. I think this is a necessary action. Thanks. Qaei ( talk) 12:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Trut-h-urts man ( T • C) 23:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- ASAP for this and below please. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 23:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
00:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Rougned Odor and Toronto Blue Jays
- Rougned Odor ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Toronto Blue Jays ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Related to above request. Tampabay721 ( talk) 23:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
00:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already done.
Katie
talk
00:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This is the current header for the politics section of the Donald Trump article:
"Trump has described his political leanings and positions in various ways over time.[200][201][202] Politico has described his positions as "eclectic, improvisational and often contradictory".[202] He has listed his party affiliation as Republican, Independence Party, Democrat, and "decline to state".[202][203] He has also run as a Reform Party candidate.[203] Specifically, he has changed his positions on taxing the wealthy, abortion rights and health care.[202]"
I think it is unfair to describe his positions as inconsistent and say nothing else in the first paragraph, especially since the 4 sources used clearly have an anti-Trump bias just by looking at the titles. Instead, it should outline his positions listed here Donald Trump Positions. I would even be open to including both, but it is unfair to just say that his positions flip-flop.
--Beep Boop 06:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leon1122334455 ( talk • contribs)
- Not done No specific edit proposed.
Katie
talk
20:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
17 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts, particularly over the course of today. Entranced98 ( talk) 14:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs restoring previously removed BLP-violations, IPs that judging by the page history are socks of of indefinitely blocked User:Ishq Hawa Mein. Thomas.W talk 14:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Rumored move to a new club has led to repeated IP vandalism. Ratha K ( talk) 14:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism after exams. May conside doing same for Edexcel and OCR.
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring and vandalism. OuendanL ( talk) 04:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. And use the article's talk-page, as one IP has suggested.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by person using similar IP addresses. Dan56 ( talk) 06:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Widr for 48 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
17:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 21:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I have no idea who this person is or what I might have done to spawn such rage… Phil | Talk 09:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia admins like getting kicked in the face and being forced to eat goat poo ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 14:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Sarahj2107 (
talk)
14:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent ( talk) 15:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shahin ( talk) 06:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This "our boy" joke has gone too far. HeroKingMarth ( talk) 06:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- oops accidentally linked to the talk page, sorry I'm still new to this
HeroKingMarth (
talk)
06:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: This page is under attack by a bunch of registered and unregistered users adding loads of WP:COPYVIO text. Warnings haven't helped. Please reinstate the cleaned up version and lock the page. Some blocks to the involved editors might also be necessary. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I blocked the main offender; I'll leave it to others to finish cleaning up the copyvios.
Katie
talk
12:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Dilma's impeachment
- President of Brazil ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Presidents of Brazil ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- BRICS ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- First Ladies and Gentlemen of Brazil ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vice President of Brazil ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Due to ongoing events, there's a high level of IP and new user's disruption on these pages. Frenditor ( talk) 11:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Semi-protected one: Only President of Brazil seems to have much actual vandalism. I have semi-protected that for 2 weeks. The rest is mostly edit warring over whether or not Michel Temer should be counted as a president. If that gets out of hand, some kind of protection may be called for... but in the first instance, it might be better to direct people to the discussion at Talk:President of Brazil#Should we replace Dilma Roussef with Michel Temer as the incumbent president?. Yaris678 ( talk) 14:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done (partly, procedural, for the bot)
Lectonar (
talk)
12:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing . Donnowin1 ( talk) 02:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by IPs (IP-hopper) with. [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. Wario-Man ( talk) 04:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
12:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need a month's protection from IPs. Allow only auto-confirmed users. Consistent vandalism for box office figures. - Vivvt ( Talk) 07:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Has suddenly become a target for disruption by numerous new accounts - Arjayay ( talk) 07:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be a chan-thing.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent whitewashing. And now by apparent sock. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps start an SPI.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
War of 1812 articles
- Capture of HMS Penguin ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Capture of HMS Cyane and HMS Levant ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism by obvious alias of UnbiasedVictory ( talk), blocked for repeated sockpuppetry and persistent disruptive edits. It took about six hours from protection being lifted for vandalism to start again. HLGallon ( talk) 10:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Something about the Notorious BIG being continually reinserted. – Muboshgu ( talk) 00:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined At least two good-faith editors, one of whom adding substantial constructive content. I'd like to see vandalism persist a bit longer before protecting, or perhaps give early confirmation to this user —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. — IB [ Poke ] 09:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandal edits his own SPI page. Laber□ T 18:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Laberkiste, is there something disruptive about the two edits the IP has made to the page? To me it does not look disruptive. -- GB fan 18:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Ditto. Don't see anything out of line —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted three times now. Boleyn ( talk) 19:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Not appropriate just yet in my book. Most recent deletion was the result of an AfD discussion, prior creations were from 7+ years ago —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. LoudLizard ( 📞 | contribs | ✉) 20:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Seems to have passed —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: deleted per CDF. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 20:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined That CfD was from 2011, and the recent recreation by an established editor. I think this is worthy of discussion —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Advertising article title. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 20:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Has only been created once, and deleted as author-requested. No reason to protect. Should this be a worthy topic moving forward, this could seemingly serve as a fitting redirect —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Target dynamic IP adding defamatory content. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 04:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism from a vandalism-only account. Be better off just blocking the user. They have officially been warned and all that. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Like many of the NBA team articles, this particular article has a long history of general vandalism. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs and a sock user. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 9980+ transclusions, definitely highly visible. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 02:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal is targeting this article. . -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Datbubblegumdoe talk – contribs 02:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
SQL. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term pattern of vandalism that composes almost all edits though it doesn't happen that often on a time basis. Everymorning (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Beat me to it... there's been an uptick in IP vandalism in recent days in addition to the constant hum of IPs removing "conspiracy" from the Cultural Marxism header. Given that the article came off a 6-month semi protection back on April 2, might consider another 6-month protection, or perhaps a year? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lengthy history of disruption —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --21:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Kansas Bear ( talk)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
21:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent removals and one recent case with quotations being used excessively. QWER11296 ( talk) 22:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Lizard ( talk) 23:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
03:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism being committed by an IP and an account created by said IP. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 23:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
04:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of schoolchild-type vandalism. Every IP and new user edit for months has been vandalism. Deli nk ( talk) 18:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Permanent semi please. Every time temporary semi goes off, the stupid kiddie vandal edits start up again. . Montanabw (talk) 19:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Page has been unprotected since September 2015, and it's not edited frequently enough to justify semi-protection at all, much less indefinite semi-protection.
Katie
talk
21:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A few IPs are tying to remove the redirect. This edit and summary show that they have no desire to discuss. MarnetteD| Talk 22:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Yamaguchi先生.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
23:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
18 May 2016
Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism or disruptive editing – Last vandalism was May 3. Protecting administrator not active at the moment. George Ho ( talk) 08:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Or renew pending changes. Some editors may guffaw at the topic and then make bad editing intentionally. George Ho ( talk) 08:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The last edits were not really disruptive, just differing opinions ny (mostly) established users.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Or renew pending changes. George Ho ( talk) 08:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Protection: An edit war has broken out. IMO A short break is likely to result in the edit warriors calming down. Guy Macon ( talk) 13:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Seems to have petered out, both sides used their 3 reverts. Rather quiet since then. Seems more like a content dispute anyway.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 14:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qaei ☎ 11:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined There was definitely some vandalism in the past, but you and MilestoneDuke have cleaned it all up. You and/or MilestoneDuke also seemed to have got slightly confused along the way... which looks a bit like an edit war... but its all sorted now so nothing to worry about.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep changing the number of residents to 0. Dodi 8238 ( talk) 14:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Somewhat stale.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 15:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 15:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: No idea why, but this seems to be an idiot magnet today. Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Semi is overkill. The sockpuppets have dissappeared after a few months and stopping IPs from editing this is pointless now. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 09:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Doc James: Pinging protecting admin.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
11:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- There was legal threats and sock puppetry. A year of semi protection I see as justified. I could change it to pending changes if people want.
- Okay done. Changed to PC1. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done (for the bot).
Lectonar (
talk)
18:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated POV push to list Robert Cailliau as co-inventor of the WWW, alongside TB-L. Raised as RfC on Talk:. Andy Dingley ( talk) 09:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To be clear, this is a sockpuppetry issue, not a content issue. I've warned the editor against edit warring and not to edit while logged out. The account will be autoconfirmed by the time protection expires, if he hasn't used up all his
rope yet.
Katie
talk
11:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Baking Soda ( talk) 11:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP...5.xxx
Lectonar (
talk)
11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increase in IP vandalism and test edits over the past couple weeks. Semi-protection for a month should help to discourage further vandalism from this person or group. – Quoth ( talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated POV push to list Robert Cailliau as co-inventor of the WWW, alongside TB-L. Raised as RfC on Talk:. Andy Dingley ( talk) 09:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To be clear, this is a sockpuppetry issue, not a content issue. I've warned the editor against edit warring and not to edit while logged out. The account will be autoconfirmed by the time protection expires, if he hasn't used up all his
rope yet.
Katie
talk
11:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Baking Soda ( talk) 11:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP...5.xxx
Lectonar (
talk)
11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increase in IP vandalism and test edits over the past couple weeks. Semi-protection for a month should help to discourage further vandalism from this person or group. – Quoth ( talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 06:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
06:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of distinct IP vandalism since an incident in the IIHF World Championship game between Canada and Finland. MisterRandomized ( talk) 09:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continual edit warring by (probably the same) IP editor under a variety of IP addresses. DH85868993 ( talk) 09:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP using multiple IP's, Block evasion. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel) 04:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
04:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.35 ( talk) 04:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection for one month. There is something weird going on with this Australian paralympian in the RW; some kind of stalker issue that led to her changing her name and trying to suppress her old name. We have that resolved mostly but tonight a sockpuppeting user is making strange unsourced changes. (am handling that separately with an SPI) We can manage changes going forward with edit requests under full page protection and the article won't be disrupted. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 06:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection for one month: A series of IP editors from Saudi Arabia and throw-away accounts are changing the article to say that Shias are not really Moslems: [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45] This is fringe point of view. It would be great if they would add a paragraph with citations explaining this point of view as it has great merit. But it is not a generally held point of view in Europe, and should not be given undue weight. Toddy1 (talk) 07:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IPs keep changing the name spelling without citing any sources. Random86 ( talk) 08:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by IP editor -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
03:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors claiming to be associated with Gotti appear to be whitewashing the page. clpo13( talk) 03:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The template has only 6 transclusions, but this template is very visible. It's used as part of the edit notice of used as part of the editnotice of ANI. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 05:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: From semi protection to no protection please. I have asked the protecting admin, but they haven't been active recently. -- de Facto ( talk). 06:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Lectonar (
talk)
07:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 23:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
01:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
01:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.40 ( talk) 00:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.40 ( talk) 00:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from 3 vastly different sources in the last week, and a long history of problems with unconfirmed editors on this article. Tends to come in waves. I think we're on the cusp of another wave. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 01:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editor keeps ignoring WP:TRUE despite multiple warnings. Please semi-protect the article for 1-2 days to end the edit war. bender235 ( talk) 20:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. User appears to have added sources for the claim.
Nakon
01:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent ip vandalism. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 20:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
01:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fangusu posting unblock appeals to the usual talk pages again. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 04:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- In case it's not obvious enough, the posts are actually copies of a Mar 2 edit request by a now-blocked sock, complete with the signature. Meters ( talk) 04:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a high level of vandalism on the article by replacing many content with fictional names and false contents without proper citing. MbahGondrong ( talk) 23:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Keeping the pattern of vandalism on UFC PPV pages. This event takes place on June 4th, so I suggest a protection until June 5th to avoid vandalism until after the event takes place. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 23:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected until 5 June 2016.
Nakon
01:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The same unsourced information keeps being added; this has been happening since at least March. Random86 ( talk) 00:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – JG66 keeps removing the image that I added, even when it's up at FFD. I don't want to violate the three-revert rule. He still keeps removing it and does not want the image and its FFD caption shown to readers. George Ho ( talk) 00:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic vandalism, was protected in the past but protection expired, I think another spell is needed - serious BLP vios were live in the article for several hours today. . Fyddlestix ( talk) 01:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism/disruptive editing by numerous IP users. Consider protecting it for a month or longer. Israel's Son 01:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of poorly-sourced contentious information about a living person. VQuakr ( talk) 20:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent ip vandalism. -- Omaislam ( talk) 21:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
You are the vandal for reversing sourced content 10 times in 10 minutes. Check the history. 86.169.59.94 ( talk) 21:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This IP belongs to TheFlyingHorse who has been blocked indefinitely -- Omaislam ( talk) 21:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC) No I am not. You are a liar trying to defend the fact that you reversed sourced content 10 times in 10 minutes. 86.169.59.94 ( talk) 21:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bajillion and a half edits today alone... EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 22:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent, High level of IP vandalism and Edit warring. Akocsg ( talk) 14:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This has already been done. Please see his talk page, everything is deleted deliberately in an instant. He was also reported by another user already.
Akocsg (
talk)
15:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, and now the IP is blocked, so everythiing is shipshape. Lectonar ( talk) 16:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Constant disorganized and unnecessary edits.
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
20:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Both my user and talk page have been vandalized numerous times in the past week; see this incident report for background. Funcrunch ( talk) 00:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Materialscientist (
talk)
00:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IPs. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 00:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
00:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
19 May 2016
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. McGeddon ( talk) 18:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 18:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This could be a article as tons of pages seem to link to it (probably on a template). Wgolf ( talk) 18:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The lowercase version is salted, so might as well as salt this too. Wgolf ( talk) 18:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after PC was added, the IPs continue to disruptive edit. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Yes...that is the purpose of pending changes, but the edit doesn't go "live"; imagine the IP editing and his edit not showing up :).
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: Fair enough, but wouldn't the smarter idea be blocking the vandal or making it so IPs can't edit at all, for a few days/weeks?
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
08:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, but the problem is that the vandal seems to be using a dynamic IP, making it difficult to block them. T v x1 14:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: Fair enough, but wouldn't the smarter idea be blocking the vandal or making it so IPs can't edit at all, for a few days/weeks?
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
08:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by various IP users. epicgenius ( talk) 15:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Since November, 2015, there have been near continual edits and vandalism to the Law and Justice ideology side panel by unregistered IP's. A month of protection might reduce the frequency of such changes. CopperPhoenix ( talk) 18:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after PC was added, the IPs continue to disruptive edit. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Yes...that is the purpose of pending changes, but the edit doesn't go "live"; imagine the IP editing and his edit not showing up :).
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: Fair enough, but wouldn't the smarter idea be blocking the vandal or making it so IPs can't edit at all, for a few days/weeks?
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
08:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, but the problem is that the vandal seems to be using a dynamic IP, making it difficult to block them. T v x1 14:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Lectonar: Fair enough, but wouldn't the smarter idea be blocking the vandal or making it so IPs can't edit at all, for a few days/weeks?
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
08:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by various IP users. epicgenius ( talk) 15:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Since November, 2015, there have been near continual edits and vandalism to the Law and Justice ideology side panel by unregistered IP's. A month of protection might reduce the frequency of such changes. CopperPhoenix ( talk) 18:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated adding of unreliably sourced material by IP users. - Katanin ( talk) 16:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow...and a brand new article. Live and learn.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits against consensus. Garchy ( talk) 16:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism over the last week. Hopefully a week or two protection discourages this IP. Kingofaces43 ( talk) 16:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Return of single-purpose multiple-IP vandalism, now pasting in nonsensical edit summaries. Ken Gallager ( talk) 13:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Ever since the subject collected his first ever career win, his article has been subjected to continuous disruptive editing both by IP's and registered editors (lots of whom have registered in the last few days specifically to edit this article). T v x1 14:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should stop most of the newly-created accounts too; has not reached the level where full protection is needed.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. I always forget that semi-protection also prevents edits from editors who haven't been registered for more than four days. T v x1 14:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP vandalism the minute the semi expired. . Sam Sailor Talk! 14:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Lectonar.
Katie
talk
15:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant changing of car class from "sports car" to "super car" by IP address. I have clarified WP:CARCLASS on the talk page, and other editors have also reverted and informed the editor of the reason, with no engagement. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 12:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to Google Doodle traffic. Ketone16 ( talk) 13:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move warring & cut-and past moves between Dnipro (city) and Dnipropetrovsk. Needs a proper move discussion, and stopping the wheel war will help start the discussion. Joseph2302 ( talk) 13:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP introducing errors. Vin09 (talk) 08:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Qed237 (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. It's a common redirect to a template-protected template.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Qed237 (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. It's a common redirect to a template-protected template.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The anti-semetic ref desk troll is back. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Stale now; sorry for not reacting earlier.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP has repeatedly added excessive detail to the plot summary, and has begun making minor edits after large ones to make reverting more difficult. Argento Surfer ( talk) 20:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The rosters are the tournaments are being released and many IP addresses are making unsourced changes. GoPurple 'n Gold24 09:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The anti-semetic ref desk troll is back. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Stale now; sorry for not reacting earlier.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP has repeatedly added excessive detail to the plot summary, and has begun making minor edits after large ones to make reverting more difficult. Argento Surfer ( talk) 20:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The rosters are the tournaments are being released and many IP addresses are making unsourced changes. GoPurple 'n Gold24 09:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 22:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent removal of referenced information. Simione001 ( talk) 22:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by users including several IPs and User:760Rebel. Changing station's format, writing messages defamatory of previous owners, etc. Raymie ( t • c) 23:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by the same IP. Borikén ( talk · ctb) 23:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. If you are talking about the IP6-IP...that has died down.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP/unregistered users. Daguerty ( talk) 24:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and linkspam by agenda driven IPs Marquis de Faux ( talk) 01:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A couple of days of SP needed because of repeated vandalism by multiple IPs after Sevilla FC defeated Liverpool in the Europa League final. Thomas.W talk 03:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined For now it seems manageable and will die down soon enough; not all IP edits are vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent Tumblr post has brought vandalizing anonymous editors to add "hater of raw red onions" to page after screenshot of such a post. Alex|The|Whovian ? 03:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 03:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.13 ( talk) 04:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.13 ( talk) 04:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP user keeps on section blanking Controversies section and sometimes Overview section. Rakesh.goyal2019 ( talk) 05:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has been protected before, only to be vandalized/disrupted by IP addresses after semi protect expired. "Damn Daniel", "White Vans" etc. CoolCanuck eh? 21:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 22:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: General IP unconstructiveness, similar to the crap at Muggsy Bogues, which was recently protected. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 08:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent modification by an unregistered TOR network user. 7 Days should be enough to send this anonymous hater back to oblivion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Magister-veritas ( talk • contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You accuse me of using TOR and hateful behavior? Dude... Nervous guy here and I'm the one trying to talk. And yeah, it was edit-war and COI is strong here. I'm not sure how to handle this properly. Project, this user is advocating for, is fresh and is recruiting. I won't discuss purpose of his/her user account anymore than I need to. -- Takbardak ( talk) 19:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing from IPs, most recently including the restoration of an uncited passage that has been removed by several different editors. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 21:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 3 or 4 different IP editors today. . -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Now 5 different IP Editors, I believe it is likely they are all the same person. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs battling it out over whose SYN is more accurate. SummerPhD v2.0 23:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. somewhat lame, this edit-warring...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aft197 ( talk) 00:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article has been described as "one of the inaugural Wikipedia pages, along with Snow, in the Blake Bortles Wikipedia Reading Club". Since being so designated, it has been the target of numerous unconstructive edits. As well as semi-protection, it would be useful if someone knew how to contact this "club" and dissuade them from such edits. (Fortunately, Snow is already semi-protected.) - David Biddulph ( talk) 00:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 01:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced possible BLP violations. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs attempting to add unsourced information on this article goes against BLP. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 03:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent modification by an unregistered TOR network user. 7 Days should be enough to send this anonymous hater back to oblivion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Magister-veritas ( talk • contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You accuse me of using TOR and hateful behavior? Dude... Nervous guy here and I'm the one trying to talk. And yeah, it was edit-war and COI is strong here. I'm not sure how to handle this properly. Project, this user is advocating for, is fresh and is recruiting. I won't discuss purpose of his/her user account anymore than I need to. -- Takbardak ( talk) 19:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing from IPs, most recently including the restoration of an uncited passage that has been removed by several different editors. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 21:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 3 or 4 different IP editors today. . -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Now 5 different IP Editors, I believe it is likely they are all the same person. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs battling it out over whose SYN is more accurate. SummerPhD v2.0 23:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. somewhat lame, this edit-warring...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aft197 ( talk) 00:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article has been described as "one of the inaugural Wikipedia pages, along with Snow, in the Blake Bortles Wikipedia Reading Club". Since being so designated, it has been the target of numerous unconstructive edits. As well as semi-protection, it would be useful if someone knew how to contact this "club" and dissuade them from such edits. (Fortunately, Snow is already semi-protected.) - David Biddulph ( talk) 00:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 01:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced possible BLP violations. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs attempting to add unsourced information on this article goes against BLP. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 03:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Fall guy being blamed for Liverpool losing a final against his former team. '''tAD''' ( talk) 21:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done However,
Alberto Moreno (footballer) has been protected by Ponyo. Please make sure you link the correct page next time. :-)
Katie
talk
00:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 22:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. 2605:6000:EB12:4E00::/64 blocked one week.
Katie
talk
00:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This is a configuration page for my bot. FASTILY 23:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by an unregistered IP address. Best, Irrooop ( talk) 18:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Lord Roem.
Katie
talk
00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of false and unsourced information by IP editors since the article's creation. The1337gamer ( talk) 19:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Sergecross73.
Katie
talk
00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Widr.
Katie
talk
00:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Regards, James ( talk/ contribs) 18:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Actually, only re-created once. 10 Years between creations.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Final played today so lot of vandalism and disruption. Qed237 (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk)
21:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
20 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slew of unproductive edits over the last couple days. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 20:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 20:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repetitive problematic edits from both sides of political spectrum - removals of sourced information ( diff1 diff2), insertion of editorial POV phrasings ( diff1 diff2). A possibility exists that some of this is linked to the previous and current protection of Oath Keepers due to similar repeat conduct and coordination of IP and throwaway account editing via off-wiki forums.
Conduct has continued/increased today with more removal of sourced content, both by IP and by throwaway account that appears to have a WP:COI relation to one of the 3-percenter groups. diff1 diff2 Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) 12:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:ACA1:FEEF:9EB7:3339 ( talk) 19:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandal page. Feinoha Talk 19:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated by sockpuppets. Joseph2302 ( talk) 12:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An AfD was closed as redirect two weeks ago; various IPs have been reverting the article to its non-redirect version since. McGeddon ( talk) 14:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some edit warring over Jews being Asians. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 16:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I have a dispute with an editor about having a VHS image; he and I need a further discussion because we shouldn't risk violating the 3RR. George Ho ( talk) 06:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: This is just blatant forumshopping for a longterm edit-war over a file he uploaded and wants used for the infobox: [46], [47], [48], [49]. Since he was unable to attain consensus on the article's talk page, he is now resuming the edit war, and blatantly WP:FORUMSHOPPING: [50], [51]. George Ho has been warned on his talk page and asked to self-revert per BRD, but as yet he has not. Softlavender ( talk) 06:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- This
guybelieves thatheowns everything and that consensus was valid. However, consensus may change, and the talk was two years ago. As for BRD, it's an essay, andhekeeps making threats on me. George Ho ( talk) 06:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC) - Oops, I realize it's a she. George Ho ( talk) 06:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- This
- Declined Full protection is not the way to go here; continue discussing, on which ever page you choose.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Lectonar, can you reconsider? Discussion outside FFD won't help much. Better yet, I could not reinsert VHS without violating rules. I even reinserted just the FFD caption, but it was reverted. George Ho ( talk) 11:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
George Ho: I stand by my decision: RFP is not the right venue to decide what is essentially a content/inclusion/exclusion dispute. As a sidenote: for now, I do not see there is consensus to include what you would like to include. Gain concensus for a change, and it will be changed. Either way, it can not be done via RFP. If another admin wants to fully-protect: I do not object, of course.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: If you can't come to a consensus on the talk page, consider WP:Dispute resolution. If the edit war continues, consider WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Yaris678 ( talk) 12:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS 77 ✉ 14:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since temporary protection the attempts at vandalism have continued unabated. Karst ( talk) 15:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Logo is still being changed to the english logo from the arabic logo. Flow234 ( talk) 09:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs resuming POV edits within an hour of the previous month-long protection expiring. McGeddon ( talk) 14:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: To merge Haji Springer (rapper) with this. Musa Talk 21:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Please check with the protecting administrator,
Tokyogirl79 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response. Thanks,
Nakon
- @ Nakon: I have created many salted articles ( Abbas Ali Khan, Raxstar, Bilal Saeed) and every time I requested unprotection my request was accepted but I don't know why you rejected it. And Tokyogirl79 deleted the page per discussion which took place in 2010. And I have created the article after five years. You can clearly see the signs of notability in the article. I have now moved it to draft and I'll submit it after checking it once.-- Musa Talk 06:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Nakon: It looks like this is Mnaqvii evading a block for sockpuppetry that he received back in 2014. This username is the same as one of his sockpuppets, SMusaRaza, which was confirmed at SPI. Musa Raza looks to be a WP:DUCK since he is editing on the same topics and has even created an article for one of the same people that the accounts were trying to add. Also, Mnaqvii was specifically told that he should not open up a new account and that he should seek an unblock in the future under his main account. This looks to be a clear attempt to circumvent the guidelines. I'm also concerned about the sourcing on the draft article since some of them don't actually link to a news story and the others are trivial mentions or go to places Wikipedia wouldn't really consider reliable. Given that it was deleted at AfD and there's a history of sockpuppetry, the sourcing would have to be quite strong and I don't see where that's the case here. I'm going to block Musa Raza for block evasion and sockpuppetry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IP. Onel5969 TT me 01:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent change of content without any reference by unregistered user and newly registered user. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 07:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. The IP and the the newly registered one might be the same person; aprt from those, not much vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping user has been vandalizing this article. We've blocked two of them already and he continues to find new IPs. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 12:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Extremely High level of IP vandalism. Clubjustin ( talk) 10:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: This page was batch semi protected with several interstate articles. Now, an edit filter was made, so it can have a different protection level. It has never needed protection because it has no vandalism and very few edits.
- Not unprotected Please check with the protecting administrator,
HJ Mitchell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response. Thanks,
Nakon
00:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry and block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/The UPN Vandal resumed immediately after protection expired. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 03:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page's protection was removed, and the IP's and anonymous editors immediately returned to continue high-level of vandalism, disruptive editing and addition of poorly sourced/unsourced content. livelikemusic talk! 03:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – during PC-protection before its expiration. George Ho ( talk) 04:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – among other things, with plenty of IP activity. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 07:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Virtually all anon IP edits are vandals. Need permanent protection on article. Montanabw (talk) 02:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Tito Dutta (
talk)
06:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 03:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued high-level of test editing and disruptive edits by IPs and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 22:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated unexplained deletion of content and/or addition of his own WP:LINKSPAM and WP:PROMOTION apparently from British teenager J.V.Clegg, using at least 9 single-purpose WP:SOCK accounts over 4 years with missing or false edit summaries. See these diffs from H114532, Sr4498302, SusanaB2008, Nigelorgans, Caseyrosshampton7, MusicProff1963, London Organist, PipesUK, and now (twice today) OrganMasterFrance and OrganMasterFrance. — Patrug ( talk) 00:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Please request the spam URLs be blacklisted at
WP:SBL. Thanks,
Nakon
00:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 01:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Significant level of IP disruption and edit-warring in the last 5+ days (and overall for the past 6 to 12 months). Softlavender ( talk) 02:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
05:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
semi-protection: We Dont want anyone editing this page but the celebrity official representatives, which is us. please lock
- Declined Learn a bit about Wikipedia before making demands, hmmm?
WP:OWN for starters perhaps?
Lectonar (
talk)
18:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Obviously a high profile case concerning a living person. There are problems with IP vandalism. As this case gets closer to coming to court (havn't really been following it) I think it would be prudent to restrict the page to registered users, like we already have for the main page on Cosby Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 20:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Doesn't look that out of hand right now —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attempts to depart from what the sources say by IP. Philafrenzy ( talk) 20:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Disruption is quite infrequent —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of poorly sourced content and test edits by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 22:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection of my talk page, if possible. Anonymous personal attacks have continued unabated with block evasion, starting from this incident report. Funcrunch ( talk) 22:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., IP-hopping vandalism.
Nakon
00:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past 3 or 4 days. Borikén ( talk · ctb) 22:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending transaction is still not announced. According to sources, "an announcement may still be two or three days away". – Muboshgu ( talk) 00:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repetitive problematic edits from both sides of political spectrum - removals of sourced information ( diff1 diff2), insertion of editorial POV phrasings ( diff1 diff2). A possibility exists that some of this is linked to the previous and current protection of Oath Keepers due to similar repeat conduct and coordination of IP and throwaway account editing via off-wiki forums. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) 14:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – out of control with this current event. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 17:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Hmmm...I really do not see that much IP-vandalism, but many participants who do their best to keep this article about an ongoing event sourced and up to date. Relist please if it really gets out of control
Lectonar (
talk)
18:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: "Article has been received persistent disruption from numerous unrelated IP editors over the span of two days. - Jasonbres ( talk) 20:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Widr (
talk)
21:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
21 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation to a BLP. Qed237 (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism since July 2013, usually from the 75.120.X.X range. The edits are too numerous to list so I will list just one from each month since it started to prove that it is persistent campaign: July 2013; August 2013; September 2013; February 2014; March 2014; April 2014; May 2014; July 2014; October 2014; December 2014; protected January-April 2015; May 2015; June 2015; October 2015; November 2015; December 2015; January 2016; March 2016; April 2016; May 2016; the most recent. This is just a sample and it barely scratches the surface. These temporary protections are no good: a month long lock-up won't deter an editor who has conducted a 3-year campaign The page needs either indefinite semi-protection or at least indefinite pending changes. Betty Logan ( talk) 18:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: See
User:Clpo13/Friends vandal for a record of similar vandalism on this and other Friends articles. It's especially concerning to see that it goes back so far. My oldest evidence is only from October 2015.
clpo13(
talk)
18:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 18:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amccann421 (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on BLP. Qed237 (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued further persistent edit warring (with a few unknown IPs, and user StealthForce) over the awards not being held since 2014, when there really haven't.
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued further persistent edit warring over who won the best Sci-Fi show award (again, with a few unknown IPs, and user StealthForce, and Outlander was the winner, NOT The Walking Dead).
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
20:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - vandalism throughout two days.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 13:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism / disruptive edits. StarScream1007 ►Talk 16:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It actually appears the ongoing edit wars among established users are more disruptive at this time.
Laser brain
(talk)
17:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. (affiliate marketing) SamIX ( talk) 17:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Laser brain
(talk)
17:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RybAxel but continuously recreated. LM2000 ( talk) 14:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be having a positive impact on this article. I have only been able to find one non-autoconfirmed edit in the past five months which was not reverted. Meanwhile, the hundreds of reverts are drowning out the real edits to this article in the history. Intelligent sium 14:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. Vandalism is far too frequent for PC protection to be effective.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rampant editing tests are happening since the last 72 hours on this article which is about a film that was released yesterday. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 14:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits based on rumours. Qed237 (talk) 14:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of non-relevance content ( SPAM) by Escravoes. This user is known for the same disruptive content addition (spamming) on articles such as (which have been reverted) this on Samutprakarn Crocodile Farm, this on Malaysian ringgit, Claude Shannon and this on Lawal Kaita. Herman Jaka ( talk) 04:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined User is autoconfirmed, so pending changes would have no effect.
Widr (
talk)
10:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user continues to vandalize own talk page. Amccann421 (talk) 05:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Talk page access revoked.
Widr (
talk)
10:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing from several IP users. Israel's Son 06:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
10:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Firebrace ( talk) 13:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Again, this page was semi protected with lots of interstate articles. However, an edit filter was approved and can have a different protection level. It does not need protection anyway, because there is no vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:184:e600:8a63:dfff:fe96:6313 ( talk) 01:49, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Please check with the protecting administrator,
HJ Mitchell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response. Thanks,
Nakon
02:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Way too much spamming on this page. — Etimena 03:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Nakon
03:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of adding fake boxscore numbers by IP's and anonymous editors. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 03:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The subject's agent or fans are back pushing their version of the subject. Please lock the page, or possibly permanently add pending edits. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:19, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired, angry fans need time to calm down. Qed237 (talk) 10:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
10:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Just over the past few months this page has been the subject of a protracted edit war, has attracted attention from three different sockpuppeteers, and has been subjected to a fair amount of IP vandalism. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This is one of the only unprotected US presidential candidates, and people keep editing it. Adotchar ( talk) 00:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and a lot of careless IP editing that just ends up getting reverted. KDS4444 ( talk) 00:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is of a very prominent figure, and as expected, is being constantly vandalized. I suggest it should be protected from being edited by IP and non-confirmed users permanently. Jamie Tubers ( talk) 14:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors adding unsourced content and it is constantly reverted. OuendanL ( talk) 20:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Bigg Lyte has been salted already. Wgolf ( talk) 20:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
22:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection The essay is under RfC for promotion to Guidance level. Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Promote_WP:Tagging_pages_for_problems_to_guideline
An editor has already modified the content without consensus. diff Though not a substantial change, the editor has a history of degrading articles which are under discussion (AfD see edit history of deleted article) to match his ideology and desired outcome. There is likely to be other contention, where editors modify the content.
A rollback to the submitted verson [ (old version)] and protection is requested, so the policy vote is not on a moving target. The editor's content can be added after the vote with wider consensus. 009o9 Disclosure (Talk) 20:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: City changed name, but there is no evidence that club will change name so this should be protected as inexperinced editors has started moving it. . Qed237 (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined A single page move and revert isn't enough to warrant protection. Please re-report should this continue —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Two weeks please, I will then revert the current badness. I accidentally found this page with a lot of old nonsense in it. The subject is a school teacher and the students need time to find another hobby. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – CONTINUED addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors. Page continues to get abused in such way whenever protection is removed. livelikemusic talk! 01:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Template protection: Highly visible template. Carl Fredik 💌 📧 13:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template. 96 transclusions —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. . Abel ( talk) 15:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP fest. — TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 17:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Laber□ T 18:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
20:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous edit warring: IP's are warring over whether the word "alleged" should be used without discussing on the talk page instead. Sro23 ( talk) 19:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Two IP users vandalizing and edit warring. 67.92.50.150 ( talk) 20:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
00:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
22 May 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous unsourced additions/vandalism that led to previous semiprot reoccurred as soon as the semiprot expired. -- ferret ( talk) 14:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Article was previously protected and had pending changes for a month due to vandalism Although both protection and pc have just now ended - IPs have already today been vandalizing it (and the same IPs had been vandalizing List of Friday Download episodes in the past) so I'm reasking for both indef protection & pc now as I know the vandals are going to come back either today or tomorrow so to save time I'm asking now, Thanks,. – Davey2010 Talk 19:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC wasn't very useful.
Widr (
talk)
20:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brilliant thanks Widr :), – Davey2010 Talk 20:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/blanking by multiple IPs. Mike1901 ( talk) 20:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
20:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Floquenbeam! Mike1901 ( talk) 20:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – SPAs adding WP:FRINGE content. See also Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Frederick S. Jaffe. The article is under discretionary sanctions ( WP:ARBAB) and a 1RR restrictiction. Please add full temporary while the dispute is hashed out - again - on the talk pages/dispute processes. Keri ( talk) 12:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs regarding Istrefi's birthplace (i.e. Kosovo vs Serbia, while it should remain FR Yugoslavia). Has been going on for months from a variety of IP users despite several notes being added and explanations given. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending-changes protected for 3 months.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. High profile individual, protecting until both national parties have had their conventions.
— Maile (
talk)
18:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last few days. CDRL102 ( talk) 18:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – changes to nationality, general vandalism. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 08:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
11:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are many instances of people vandalizing this page. Adotchar ( talk) 12:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism violating WP:BLP - IP-hopping editor inserting false information attempting to claim that either Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton endorsed the movie, including adding "sources" that do not match the statements made. See diff1 diff2. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) 14:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous replacement of sourced content with unsourced. Lizard ( talk) 03:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending edits or semi-protection status. The article is having continual vandalism from unregistered users requiring reversions. Temporary protection was given a month ago but disruptive edits have continued, essentially all from unregistered users.-- Josephus37 ( talk) 11:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
11:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you very much.-- Josephus37 ( talk) 11:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the most vandalised celebrity biographies. IP's are back to edit non-constructively after protection recently expired. . Krimuk|90 ( talk) 11:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
11:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection:Some users are frequently deleting my photos.I need a protection at the earliest.
- Not done No idea which page this user wants protected and why.
Katie
talk
13:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- It appears this user has been adding images of unknown origin to Nilakkal which have been removed by several users. The "frequently deleting my photos" bit seems to refer to the nonfree images this user has repeatedly uploaded, for which this user has been blocked at Commons. Intelligent sium 14:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Actually, i uploaded some images from other sites.But some users are telling that its probably a copyright violation. I had also given the source and Appropriate licences of those inages.But still, those files have been deleted. So for this reason, i am asking a protection to my article Nilakkal. I hope you will understand my situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayashankar4266 ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Nakon
20:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Protection: Persistent vandalism. The page is currently semi-protected [52]. The editor switched from IP 117.6.88.137 to Dino nam to circumvent the protection in order to continue to vandalize. Tnguyen4321 ( talk) 15:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
02:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Maybe it's because the Belmont takes place today, but there's an unusually high amount of IP vandalism on this article today. Please semi-protect for 1-2 days. -- bender235 ( talk) 22:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. • Arts Rescuer 01:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion. clpo13( talk) 03:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive edits by non-autoconfirmed editors. Requesting semi-protection through November 8, 2016. CFredkin ( talk) 04:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism of persistent IPs changing the managerial position of Conte prematurely as he is not at Chelsea until after Euro 2016. It has been page protected before for only three days, now it should be a little longer. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 04:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent POV sock editing. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 22:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I request protection due to persistent vandalism because of a new article about the subject. . Jadeslair ( talk) 22:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The page was renamed several times, even when consensus at talk page was established. The current RM was initiated as the result of technical move request, which ignored the previous consensus. George Ho ( talk) 22:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – those people who added those Filipino vandalism as mataba or taba is fat or fatty. Oripaypaykim (talk) 23:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits based on rumours. Qed237 (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adotchar ( talk) 00:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion. clpo13( talk) 02:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption and addition of non notable content (without discussion) from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
20:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor removes sources and then repeatedly PRODs for lack of notability. clpo13( talk) 18:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Nakon
20:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Even though the consensus has been made on the neutral English term for this event ("Gwangju Uprising") supplemented by ngrams, there have been many changes to the template name from users who haven't read the talk page and anonymous IPs that either revert to "Democratic Movement" (term preferred by the left) or "riot" (term preferred by the ultra-right). Dodam.a.ih ( talk) 19:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
20:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. • Arts Rescuer 19:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
20:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
20:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In 2016, this holiday takes place at 21/22 May, and so currently experiences a temporary high level of IP vandalism. I think a semi until 25 May 2016 is enough. HyperGaruda ( talk) 21:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected Semiprotected until 25 May.
Nakon
21:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
23 May 2016
Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A user /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/67.245.117.1, is constantly vandalizing the page and is removing valid sourced information with invalid edits having no links. 62.23.91.180 ( talk) 09:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 15:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 17:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
17:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Toddst1 ( talk) 01:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. The existing PC protection seems to be adequate to handle the current level of problem edits.
MelanieN (
talk)
14:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 07:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 11:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I kind of hated to do it, because I saw constructive editing by IPs as well, but the vandalism was out of control.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit warring by multiple editors with no attempt to even address in Talk. ElKevbo ( talk) 12:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated hoax article by prolific sockpuppeteer: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FilmMakers00023 and archives. Was also deleted G4. OnionRing ( talk) 13:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Bbb23..
MelanieN (
talk)
19:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Protect from unregistered users: Steady stream of unregistered IPs removing the term "Armenian Genocide" from the article. If page was protected from unregistered users, seems like it would be helpful. -- RaffiKojian ( talk) 18:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism. Previous protection by Materialscientist has expired. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 17:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism directed at the clubs owner and board. Kosack ( talk) 17:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and drive-by-user vandalism. NewEnglandYankee ( talk) 18:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has also been recreated as Cuban DVenci. Wgolf ( talk) 00:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it has only been created once (under the name I have listed here), but it has been created at least 2 more times and I have sent warnings already to the creator about autobios. (I also put it on this name as I couldn't put the RPP on the other one since it has a page there right now that is under speedy deletion)
Wgolf (
talk)
00:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I salted both, but only for a year. He might become notable in the future.
MelanieN (
talk)
14:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Someone keeps reinserting sensation info about his alleged sexuality; I just removed it. George Ho ( talk) 02:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last edit before your revert was more than a fortnight ago. I will watchlist.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Since the last temporary semi-protection measure was lifted last month in late April, there has again been a significant amount of vandalism / unsourced content / false edit summaries and BLP violations from IP users during the month of May. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 02:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Don't really know what's going on with this article, but it's quite the mess to clean-up. Possible edit warring and block evasion/socking of some sort. 172.58.41.167 ( talk) 02:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What we have here is edit warring between an IP user and a (barely) autoconfirmed,
WP:SPA user. I didn't want to use semi-protection which would advantage the autoconfirmed user. I am hoping that in the one-day pause they may start to discuss their differences at the talk page. Better yet, I am hoping that someone more objective might take a look at the article, clean out the puffery, and decide what is and is not sourced.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. And I discovered when I went to warn the two users that they are arguing and insulting each other on the IP's talk page. This is a situation possibly approaching ANI level if somebody reasonable doesn't take charge. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Protection applied. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Newly elected Chief Minister of a state in India. A barrage of unsourced BLP edits and vandalism creeping in. Semi for a few days until he takes office will help. The Masked Man of Mega Might ( talk) 08:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Previous protection period (by Widr ( talk · contribs)) only expired this morning, and (not counting my ballsed up RV effort) there's been six edits moving this player about between different potential new clubs. Gricehead ( talk) 13:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three Four different IPs in around a day and violating
WP:NPOV with the summary.
Callmemirela 🍁
{Talk}
♑
22:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A look through the revision history shows persistent disruptive changes and reverts from IP editors. Autoconfirmed-only for a lengthy period of time should take care of a lot of these problems. United States Man ( talk) 00:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. --
Tito Dutta (
talk)
12:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of BLP vandalism on this page. Yellow Dingo ( talk) 10:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Tito Dutta (
talk)
12:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. • Arts Rescuer 17:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, again. I do not see any vandalism going on at that page. If you are having content disputes with other editors, discuss the specific issues on the talk page.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 21:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 23:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- As a note-I'm almost positive this has been created under alternate names as well. Wgolf ( talk) 23:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay here is one salted one
Leafyishere
Wgolf (
talk)
23:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel) 19:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page just came off a previous 6-month semi-protection and vandalism immediately resumed.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A new poll by the Washington Post on this topic has prompted many questionable changes to this Good Article by IP editors. A temporary cooling off period is needed. WriterArtistDC ( talk) 14:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see only a couple of "questionable edits" by IP users. I do see some content disagreement involving autoconfirmed users, but semi-protection would not help with that.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IP - user from IP adress starting with 2a02:a446:83c2 (the rest changes each time) keeps changing the 'current squad' section to his own version that includes wrong information (in particular, one of the player's birthdays is wrong, and recently his edits include a typo as well). Examples: diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4. The article has been semi-protected before for this reason, but it hasn't stopped him, and I can't warn him on his talk page because of his dynamic IP adress. Kinetic37 ( talk) 17:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Doug Weller talk 19:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longer protection again needed, ethnic disruption continues after previous protection expired. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 14:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined That was one incident 6 days after the last protection expired. Let's see if it gets bad again...relist at need.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent changes being made by IP users without backing up their changes with verified sources. I've been undoing these changes on a daily basis and consistently tell users to not add any information that is unsourced. OldSkool01 ( talk) 15:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ OldSkool01: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection until 30 June (end of season). C 679 16:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If vandalism resumes after protection expires, ask again.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
24 May 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Masked Man of Mega Might ( talk) 16:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although at AfD, this has become too disruptice.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption on BLP. Qed237 (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ArghyaIndian ( talk) 18:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term, persistent vandalism, promotional IP editing, and disruptive editing overall. Regards, James ( talk/ contribs) 04:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – All or almost all of the vandalism is coming from unregistered users / There are regularly many new vandals. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 04:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism will not stop, and is very often. Target of vandalism, due to being a commonly used texting sort of thing. Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 09:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs. Mike1901 ( talk) 09:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Request semi-protection IP's adding unsourced claims, with false claims of WP:UNDUE. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Return of socks of band User:Vote (X) for Change. Diff of edit similar to those described at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change, adding false information about the definition of a tropical year. Jc3s5h ( talk) 12:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- No source has been cited to support the claim that the sourced definition of the tropical year contained in the article is wrong. 92.19.252.220 ( talk) 12:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you look at the lead of
Tropical year it confirms in two places that the tropical year is measured from the vernal equinox.
92.19.252.220 (
talk)
13:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, addition of unsourced content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:F9F3:65F4:64EA:7EEC ( talk) 12:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous edit warring. Every edit to the article for the past month has been edit warring between ip's with minimal effort made to discuss the issue on the talk page instead. Sro23 ( talk) 03:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoax page that has been recreated over and over again (also as Oh! Squints and Oh! Squints (film)). Wgolf ( talk) 04:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Should add that I want this to be RPP (can't select that option as this is a page right now) Wgolf ( talk) 04:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected The first and third one; the second one I protected on March 1st.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A particularly persistent IP keeps coming back after being temporarily blocked, does nothing but vandalism to the article. Krelnik ( talk) 13:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
14:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Per @ Callmemirela: on the talk page, it seems nothing good will come of continuing discussion on this prolific socker's talk page. . Toddst1 ( talk) 17:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected If user wants to contact Wikipedia, there are other venues.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Based on the infrequent but pretty consistent amount of vandalism going on, I am thinking that pending changes may be useful to helping stop the vandalism from appearing publicly. Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 08:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined This is far below the threshold even for pending changes protection; remember: Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that everyone can edit....:).
Lectonar (
talk)
09:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly introducing false information about charts/certifications. This is part of long-term abuse. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. ~ Rob Talk 13:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Also getting a fair amount of plain vandalism. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 14:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Block-evading IP-vandal is continuing to stalk me. See incident report for context. Funcrunch ( talk) 14:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing – IPv6 user - assuming same user, but dynamically assigned address through same 64-bit prefix - has been persistently reinstating edits which were initially rejected by this revert [53], and then twice by me. The edits include unsourced material and unexplained removal of valid wikilinks to other articles. IP has not yet discussed their edits on the article's talk page (or mine or another editor's talk page) after being reverted, as recommended per WP:BRD, and simply reinstates their edits without explanation. As the IP has a different address each time, warnings and other sanctions will not help, and thus semi-protection is best here. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Pending changes protection is insufficient; vast majority of edits from anon/new accounts are disruptive. From the last seven weeks alone: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Funcrunch ( talk) 15:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Random unsupported editing, including duplication of content, content in the wrong section, and some OR, which threatens this article's Good status; from a number of IP editors due to news stories on the topic, needs a cooling off-period.-- WriterArtistDC ( talk) 04:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This article is well under control; if you have single IPs vandalising, better to report them at
WP:AIV.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mike Schwartz ( talk) 06:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Please feel free to check the fact that (so far) during this calendar year [2016], there have been only THREE edits to this article, -- (not counting reverts) -- and ALL THREE of them had to be reverted -- (I just recently did so) -- due to IP vandalism.
(e.g., see the "History" page.)
I could see that there was NO justification given (in the edit summaries) for the DELETION of valid text (or section contents) (which in one case was a big table) ... and the one edit which had ADDED some text ... was (feel free to check the diff!) just blatant vandalism.
All three of these (IP vandalism) edits were by anonymous (" IP address") users (editors).
I do not know how long the "Semi-protection" should remain in effect.
This is the first time (that I know of) (unless I forgot some... but that's unlikely!) that I have ever submitted this kind of a request for "Semi-protection" of any page. (in "article space" or anywhere else ... iirc.)
I hope I did this correctly. In any event, any feedback or advice or other comments, would be appreciated. -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 06:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. If you have not done so already, please read the
protection policy. Wikipedia is built around the principle that anyone can edit it, so protection should be applied sparingly. Semi protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users; this is not the case in the article above. High level of vandalism would mean multiple disruptive edits per day.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Have a look at Loni Love; the article was vandalised heavily, and so has been duly protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Request protection of user space page. . Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 11:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
12:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- mcshadypl T C 03:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of IP and new account vandalism since Bismack did some cool things in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Finals. MisterRandomized ( talk) 04:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: not needed anymore. Flow234 ( talk) 21:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Please contact the protecting admin,
JamesBWatson (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response.
Nakon
01:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Why would you want to decline an unprotecting request for a page with little to no vandalism and sock puppetry? Please unprotect the page now due to low amounts of vandalism and sock puppetry.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Please check with the protecting administrator,
HJ Mitchell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response. Thanks,
Nakon
01:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Was indef semi-protected two and a half years ago in response to vandalism. I think it can be unprotected now. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 01:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Please contact the protecting admin,
JamesBWatson (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA), and let me know if you do not receive a response.
Nakon
01:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued IP disruption/vandalism for several days now. 172.56.42.162 ( talk) 02:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
02:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by several IP users today. Donner60 ( talk) 03:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Gogo Dodo for one week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.162 ( talk) 04:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Anna Frodesiak for one month.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: High level of vandalism and edit wars. Mcb1209 ( talk) 19:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Random86 ( talk) 20:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive IP edit warring and making personal attacks at the talk page. I wish we could just range block him, but I know how hairy that can get. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 21:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article and talk page. Removing liks merely cuz they're dead is contrary to policy. Also, content should not be delete merely because it does not have in-line citations. I see IPs have been deleting content merely because it does not have in-line citations. I won't speak to motives, but I have my suspicions; seen similar behavior before. Elvey( t• c) 22:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. - Katanin ( talk) 02:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. • Arts Rescuer 11:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, this is just one user, they have been warned and did not revert afterwards. If they continue, they should be brought to
WP:AVI (or
WP:3RNN) and get blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism and in-game updates which contravene project agreement. '''tAD''' ( talk) 18:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Blatant removal of content from the article by user at 130.105.230.215 and other IPs at the 130.105.23x.* range. He might be doing the same from several other articles he touched. 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 19:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Hige level of vandalism in recent past so article can not be without protection. SvEcHpInXID ( talk) 20:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ChamithN (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated disruption by Who R U? ( talk · contribs). There's a thread on ANI about this clown. Toddst1 ( talk) 21:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Who R U? has been creating plenty of socks since their block issued a day ago. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Who R U? has been creating plenty of socks since their block issued a day ago. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Who R U? has been creating plenty of socks since their block issued a day ago. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
Nakon
01:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Again I bring this page here. IPs and new users constantly adding incorrect information despite the text comments. Getting annoying :/. -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Continuing disruption by newly-registered accounts. VQuakr ( talk) 18:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 18:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Also Create protect Keegan Boyle. 2607:FB90:805A:E280:0:30:F362:9301 ( talk) 19:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations by numerous IP's. 2607:FB90:805A:E280:0:30:F362:9301 ( talk) 19:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Peter Sam Fan 15:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
18:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Soccer/football player who has rumours attached that he is joining another team. Nothing is confirmed and it's been persistently added by IP users. Everyone Dies In the End ( talk) 17:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 17:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page has been protected for a week, and with a return of IP vandals, I believe something a bit-longer term is needed. Fireflyfanboy ( talk) 18:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
25 May 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.144 ( talk) 00:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Is it too much to ask for permanent semi protection?. Iridona ( talk) 20:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected If you want it unprotected ping me please.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent spam restarting soon after protection ended. ⁓ Hello 71 20:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Many IP's adding fancruft to article without sources. MrWooHoo ( talk) 02:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The signal-to-noise ratio of anon vandalism vs. useful anon edits here is overwhelming. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 02:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.133 ( talk) 02:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: a single anon IP, who is clearly a newby and has made some constructive contributions, but is also using disruptive editing and reversions of what s/he doesn't like [see article history]. S/he does not respond to requests to discuss either on his/her talk page or at the article talk. At least two editors have tried without success to engage. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 13:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
16:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 15:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
16:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like a number of students in the school are adding current students to the page as a joke or attacks. . RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Utcursch.
Widr (
talk)
20:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bill Prady ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and
- Chuck Lorre ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary Semi-protection: These two BLPs are the creators of "Big Bang Theory", both have been attracting IP vandalism lately. First from 146.185.253.107 ( talk). As soon as that user was blocked for a week, 209.126.70.74 ( talk) appeared and picked up the game. Temporary semi-protection would help slow down the wack-a-mole game here. Krelnik ( talk) 16:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 16:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already done.
Widr (
talk)
17:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already done.
Widr (
talk)
17:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 17:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Salted.
Deor (
talk)
19:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols ( talk) 17:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
17:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Understandably, we try to avoid protection on talk pages. That said, this page is one of several repeatedly targeted by an unending barrage of IP and named socks of SalemHanna. Please see page history, the sock case and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SalemHanna. SummerPhD v2.0 13:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Actually a pity we cannot pending-changes protect talk-pages.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Slow but persistent edit-warring since December 2015 ( history). Anup [Talk] 15:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
16:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf ( talk) 15:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Currently has some disruptive editing going on. Please protect. Hdjensofjfnen ( U T C) 21:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., the edit-warring was between autoconfirmed users and ended three days ago, and one instance of IP vandalism does not justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping editor in the 113.210.0.0/17 range repeatedly adding the same unsourced nonsense to the article. Range probably too large for a range-block Gricehead ( talk) 13:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need immediate tpp due to sock puppetry/recent history of disruption. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 13:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
14:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by IPs of SalemHanna. See sock cases for details. SummerPhD v2.0 21:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined for now; usually we like to avoid protecting talk pages. TBH, the edit the user seems to be insistent about, while annoying, probably isn't too terrible to just leave it be. --
slakr\
talk /
03:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After expiry of page protection, inevitable resumption of years-old pattern of occasional IP vandalism, altering text to falsely denote the subject is real, not fictional. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 22:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
slakr\
talk /
03:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated unexplained deletions and unsourced NN additions - originally by User:Skoon 21 (currently on a 2 week block), then their sockpuppet User:Himmatwala 21 (permanently blocked) now by a string of IPs - obviously the same user Arjayay ( talk) 10:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by IPs of SalemHanna. See sock cases for details. SummerPhD v2.0 21:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined for now; usually we like to avoid protecting talk pages. TBH, the edit the user seems to be insistent about, while annoying, probably isn't too terrible to just leave it be. --
slakr\
talk /
03:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After expiry of page protection, inevitable resumption of years-old pattern of occasional IP vandalism, altering text to falsely denote the subject is real, not fictional. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 22:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
slakr\
talk /
03:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated unexplained deletions and unsourced NN additions - originally by User:Skoon 21 (currently on a 2 week block), then their sockpuppet User:Himmatwala 21 (permanently blocked) now by a string of IPs - obviously the same user Arjayay ( talk) 10:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by IPs of SalemHanna. See sock cases for details. SummerPhD v2.0 21:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined for now; usually we like to avoid protecting talk pages. TBH, the edit the user seems to be insistent about, while annoying, probably isn't too terrible to just leave it be. --
slakr\
talk /
03:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After expiry of page protection, inevitable resumption of years-old pattern of occasional IP vandalism, altering text to falsely denote the subject is real, not fictional. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 22:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
slakr\
talk /
03:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated unexplained deletions and unsourced NN additions - originally by User:Skoon 21 (currently on a 2 week block), then their sockpuppet User:Himmatwala 21 (permanently blocked) now by a string of IPs - obviously the same user Arjayay ( talk) 10:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent template-protected: Template editor protection requested, inline with {{
subst:Rfd2}} of which this is a wrapper.
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
05:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: It appears that there are 0 transclusions of this template though, which doesn't make this a
highly visible template. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
18:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is a subst-only template, and should never have any transclusions. The risk is that if improperly edited, the result may corrupt the output of the high risk template it wraps.
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs21:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)- Hi Fred Gandt, sorry for jumping to a conclusion, didn't realize this was subst-only. An admin should probably take another look at this then. To admins, sorry for mal-clerking this a bit here, if I did. I personally think semiprot should be enough for this. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
02:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Andy W.: Mistakes happen;
to err is human and all that
. Semi-prot would be acceptable as long as it has watchers, but since it's new and only has one editor so far (me), I seriously doubt it has many (1). It wraps a high use template and if a devious nogood discovered it, they could cause a lot of bother very quickly and easily by fiddling with it in inappropriate ways. If it had more people caring for it, I'd be less bothered, but with what is likely to be only me (so far), I'd play it safe and opt for template-prot in line with the template it wraps.
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs03:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Andy W.: Mistakes happen;
to err is human and all that
-
Semi-protected And watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the extra mile
Lectonar :-)
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs07:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the extra mile
Lectonar :-)
- Hi Fred Gandt, sorry for jumping to a conclusion, didn't realize this was subst-only. An admin should probably take another look at this then. To admins, sorry for mal-clerking this a bit here, if I did. I personally think semiprot should be enough for this. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb)
02:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is a subst-only template, and should never have any transclusions. The risk is that if improperly edited, the result may corrupt the output of the high risk template it wraps.
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Massive edit war, several users are reverting for a long time, now including sock-puppets too . Axiomus ( talk) 15:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment And can the protecting admin please restore the consensus version as agreed on the talk page (i.e. the last version by Izkala on 23 May). A sockpuppetry report has also been filed. Thanks, Number 5 7 15:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. As I sidenote: if a page is fully protected at all, it will be protected as it is in the moment protection is implemented....usually the
wrong version
Lectonar (
talk)
19:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Whilst we're waiting for the SPI to be dealt with, there's not much point in filing an edit warring report too. It's basically one user against everyone else editing the article (and has been for some time). If someone is going to protect it on the wrong version, don't bother (and this isn't the way it has to be – I have protected pages in the past and reverted back to the pre-edit war version when it was clear one party was transgressing).
Number
5
7
19:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then go ahead....I have seen faster reaction on the edit-warring board many times, though. Btw, I only revert back to an older version while semiprotecting. Lectonar ( talk) 20:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Whilst we're waiting for the SPI to be dealt with, there's not much point in filing an edit warring report too. It's basically one user against everyone else editing the article (and has been for some time). If someone is going to protect it on the wrong version, don't bother (and this isn't the way it has to be – I have protected pages in the past and reverted back to the pre-edit war version when it was clear one party was transgressing).
Number
5
7
19:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated content deletion by various IP editors. Spacepotato ( talk) 21:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.162 ( talk) 04:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
06:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr: But there is too much problem with vandalism fixing.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
08:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Why not fix it then?
Widr (
talk)
09:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr: Because the history shows that some users have not reverted vandalism in time. Such as the fact of having to be reverting back to pre-vandalised state.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
09:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's infrequent and manageable with reverts, if the vandalism is too much of a problem then watchlist the article. Semi-protection is an incredibly blunt tool, it shouldn't be used for all instances of persistent vandalism when it might simply need someone keeping an eye on it. tutterMouse ( talk) 15:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: : I agree wholeheartedly with
tutterMouse.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr: Because the history shows that some users have not reverted vandalism in time. Such as the fact of having to be reverting back to pre-vandalised state.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
09:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Why not fix it then?
Widr (
talk)
09:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
Widr: But there is too much problem with vandalism fixing.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
08:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 1500+ transclusions. George Ho ( talk) 10:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: : While many transclusions, imo not a high risk template per se. Last edit was in 2015. Will leave the decison to another admin.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- (non-administrator comment) I agree. {{ High-use}} suggests a transclusion count of 2000+, and {{ High-risk}} suggests 100K. Semiprotection should be enough. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 20:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely. Given that by its very nature it is used on a high amount of BLPs, I agree with the previous protecting administrator that this is a
high-risk template. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots of IP's removing sourced claims, the same editor(s) from John A. McDougall. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 20:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumptions after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 23:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Same dynamic IPv6, same person, was adding the same fiction to the article itself. When the article was protected, resumed adding this unrelated film info to the talk page of this book article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 00:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected --
slakr\
talk /
03:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated spam Grayfell ( talk) 20:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done --
slakr\
talk /
03:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by IPs of SalemHanna. See sock cases for details. SummerPhD v2.0 21:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done --
slakr\
talk /
03:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking by IPs of SalemHanna. See sock cases for details. SummerPhD v2.0 21:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done --
slakr\
talk /
03:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content added repeatedly, including promotional material. Carl Fredik 💌 📧 11:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from numerous IPs. Egghead06 ( talk) 16:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. For the last few hours, this is just one IP...
Lectonar (
talk)
19:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – User is adding defamatory information where the source clearly doesn't assert what is stated. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Has not been recreated after the AfD closed.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. GoneIn60 ( talk) 18:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
26 May 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 15:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 15:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
19:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 15:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 15:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
19:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
""needs edited to show Google doodle status of 5/26/16 68.229.212.158 ( talk) 16:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done
Katie
talk
17:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Needs a couple of weeks Semi to let this fellow cool off. A portion of the lead is perennially changed and reverted per very lengthy prior discussion on talk. But recently someone has gotten their panties in a twist over it and are randomly vandalizing. TimothyJosephWood 15:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Two weeks seems too much. It doesn't look much like the IP from the content dispute is doing the vandalizing, IMO. I want to allow that IP to edit as soon as possible; semi isn't ideal for content disputes.
Bishonen |
talk
17:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We are continually getting IPs editing this - sometimes I think it's Rosa, other times that it's a fan - they are usually from Duke, where he works, Durham, where Duke is located, or an educational network associated with Duke. Right now there's edit warring via 2 IPs, the latest from Duke, the other an educational research network that includes Duke.. Doug Weller talk 16:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked 2620:0:691:5337::/64 for one week for disruption; I don't think your IPs are the same user based on behavioral evidence, but I could be wrong.
Katie
talk
18:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same Telstra IP vandal is attacking this page. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Bbb23 for two weeks. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
16:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 14:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. The previous indef semiprotection seems to have been lost with the recent moves. Restoring.
Bishonen |
talk
15:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Football coach in the center of a sexual assault scandal at Baylor. May or may not be fired. High level of IP vandalism going on right now. Please semi-protect for 2-3 days in particular because of WP:BLP reasons. bender235 ( talk) 16:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection and Permanent Move protection to prevent annons and new users from trying to edit my page, to prevent me from moving my page to the wrong place. Taking precautionary measures. DatNuttyWikipedian ( talk) 02:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ DatNuttyWikipedian: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Nakon
04:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 enforcement. Majora ( talk) 02:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Osmanmir ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Osman Mir ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Salt: Aforementioned pages et. al. repeatedly recreated by user and speedily-deleted multiple times. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 10:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk)
15:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from 37.113.198.34 adding unsourced content. Harryhenry1 ( talk) 07:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 13:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 13:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra IP vandal attacking this page as well. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Bbb23 for 2 weeks.
tutterMouse (
talk)
14:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous removal of sourced info without getting consensus. — TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 20:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaelyngraywrites ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. Article has been speedy-deleted.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai ( talk) 02:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP Hopping. 172.58.41.254 ( talk) 02:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing attempts by IPs to delete sourced, negative material without stated reason. Matter was raised on talk page to no response, just continued deletion. Nat Gertler ( talk) 03:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – since the Imagine You and Me did not confirm from the movie those who revert from 5 edits possible from edit warring with the anon ip. Oripaypaykim (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Appears to be subject to persistent vandalism in violation of WP:NPOV, seeming to stem from strong feelings in relation to the ongoing Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir.-- Int Researcher ( talk) 14:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. I see some edit warring between auto-confirmed users. I do not see any IP vandalism or anything that semi-protection would affect. If the edit warring escalates, some other form of intervention may become necessary.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by some anon-editor(s). Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP addresses. JC · Talk · Contributions 01:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.254 ( talk) 23:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.254 ( talk) 23:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 23:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Anna Frodesiak.
Nakon
04:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs are trying like crazy (4 times in last 6 hrs) to add an uncited date of birth for DiMarco to this article. MisterRandomized ( talk) 00:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of content. 172.58.41.254 ( talk) 00:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users seem to have a tough time understanding she died in December but it wasn't made public until now. Aloha27 talk 00:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. High traffic incoming (google doodle). 142.75.255.199 ( talk) 00:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by some IPv6 -editor(s). Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 21:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by some IPv6 -editor(s). Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 21:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - Mr X 22:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of information by anon IPs and new accounts. I suspect it's some campaign to censor. I've asked to discuss on talk page and no editor has bothered. LibStar ( talk) 01:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fangusu socks again. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 01:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.254 ( talk) 02:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 02:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi or full-protection: IP hoppers and single-purpose accounts adding disparaging BLP-violating content and accusations, after the subject was mentioned in news coverage today. Likely only needed short-term. Xenophrenic ( talk) 03:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.133 ( talk) 03:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. The problem user has not vandalized since being given a final warning.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Constant disruptive editing. Coltsfan ( talk) 13:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst ( talk) 15:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jacce ( talk) 16:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Reach Out to the Truth 17:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
BOZ..
MelanieN (
talk)
04:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism coming from 4chan, trying to inject references to the "poo in loo" meme popular there in regards to India. Semi-protection for a week should keep spam off until they get bored and move on. -- KRAPENHOEFFER! TALK 18:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John of Reading ( talk) 21:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit war going on without talk page discussion. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 03:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please make sure to notify all participants in the edit war.
Nakon
04:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A recent politically charged incident has brought a large number of unregistered editors to the article expressing their personal opinion (which is a polite way of saying there's lots of vandalism). ElKevbo ( talk) 04:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 13:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC seems to have worked well in the past, let's give it another try.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent recent unsourced changes. C 679 13:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The article has been subject to IP editors adding WP:BLP violating material. - Mr X 13:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption and fancruft which are unlikely to stop anytime soon without semi-protection. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Reverts by IPs. Borsoka ( talk) 05:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The upcoming 2016 media shakeup is spurring some IP users to add unconfirmed and unsourced information to this article. Protection request until 1 July 2016 when the shakeup takes full effect, by which date all information concerning broadcasters and affiliation deals will be available. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 09:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is witnessing intensive nationalistic POV pushing and abusive edit summaries by unregistered users. Some of them are probably reasonable, but most are not. . Frequent edit-warring between them as well. Indefinite semi-protection would help consistent development of the page. Kautilya3 ( talk) 11:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing and vandalism from IP editors. Zaostao ( talk) 12:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anonymous IP consistently changes the spelling of words against the citation. Ogress 02:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP continues to change the spelling of words that are cited. Changing cited material. Ogress 02:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. (same IP as above)
Lectonar (
talk)
20:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Slow but unendingly steady rate of IP vandalism. One of those "magnet pages" that seem to attract every new kid on the block.— Gorthian ( talk) 04:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Irrational IP's throwing in 'she's a so-and-so (exploitive)' edits because of unproven and probably untrue rumors one of the co-hosts departed her series ( The Real) at the end of the season because of her. Rest of the week should cover it as the TV season ends on Friday. Nate • ( chatter) 01:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All IP edits as far as I can see have been reverted. — Music1201 talk 01:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected indefinitely. I replaced the existing PC protection with indefinite semi-protection. Vandalism is too frequent for PC to be effective.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 ( talk) 02:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yet another IP appearance from banned user Fangusu. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 21:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
27 May 2016
Pending changes: This page seems to be incapable of having sensible edits by IP editors, and it is becoming timewasting to revert this type of edit.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @
Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
21:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 18:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing through sock puppetry and vandalism mostly by IPs. Glitchygirl ( talk) 18:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The country is the Netherlands, not Holland.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to scoring on his international debut . JMHamo ( talk) 19:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Mattythewhite.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing from multiple IP users. Israel's Son 21:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing from multiple IP users. Israel's Son 21:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IP user(s). Freshh! ( talk) 21:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase ( talk | contributions) 21:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent and continued addition of defamatory/troll content at the subject's expense, i.e. jokes in relation to his alleged affair with a certain Japanese adult film actress; in spite of being previously protected for the same reason, it looks like the trolling spree against Cesar still hasn't subsided yet, hence my request for an indef semi. Blake Gripling ( talk) 10:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page keeps on being reverted to a change in subject to the non-notable rest of the park (with no references). It has been pointed out that 100's of pages link to the article as a football ground. . KylieTastic ( talk) 16:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓ Hello 71 17:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Though this template shows having only 1 transclusion, this template actually appears on thousands of WP:MFD nomination subpages. This template is part of {{ Mfd top}}, and in this template, {{ Mfd top collapse}} is set up to only appear on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Drastic changes to this template affects thousands of pages. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page was semi-protected for a short time previously until it was unlocked May 21st. IP users continue to add hoaxes and false information into the article however. -- Aura24 ( talk) 21:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-evading edit-warring. livelikemusic talk! 23:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a lot of users. I did not warn them for two reasons: in the hope that they will abstain from vandalism and that there are just too many users to warn. Peter Sam Fan 00:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Materialscientist.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 03:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; couple of IP addresses (close in number, so likely the same person) repeatedly removing a cited genre from the infobox, despite being reverted multiple times my multiple editors. oknazevad ( talk) 04:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 05:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Tokyogirl79.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Once again this page needs to be protected, how bout this time protecteing it a few more weeks then last time. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 07:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too frequently edited for pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - Repeats of similar vandalism from a range of IPs - David Biddulph ( talk) 18:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalised. Boleyn ( talk) 19:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Continuous agenda to delete and vandalise sourced information with blatant false claims that content is not sourced to mislead future editors. Suppression by deletion of reliable sourced information based on prejudice seems to be a result of nationalism in relation to the ongoing armed Kashmir conflict and United Nations dispute. This is a highly sensitive article of a political and historical nature that evokes strong feelings and needs thorough investigation and protection from experienced admins.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:55, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther : Talk 21:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Ponyo.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. INickolaev ( talk) 21:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Gerry1214 ( talk) 22:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 16:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 16:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption – An IP is conducting a unilateral edit-war against six other editors. Jaws is a featured article too so it needs to be stopped. Betty Logan ( talk) 16:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 18:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from differnet IP accounts – constant addition of unsourced portrayer of The Stig. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 18:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after the player scored an own goal. '''tAD''' ( talk) 20:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:42, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ArghyaIndian ( talk) 12:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, it is obvious that the IP is the new user, and they just need help, they do not know how to edit.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Subject of article (deceased) is in news following a US military records release to newsmedia showing that aspects of his published autobiography were deliberately embellished. IP addresses, presumably fans of subject of article, have been trying to remove reference to the news reports and trying to reinsert the incorrectly embellished numbers into the article section on his military service. Likely to continue for a few days given news reporting and relative popularity of subject (autobiography was on bestseller lists, had a movie made from it). Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz ( talk) 13:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary protection. Article has been an IP vandal target before due to attention to game. A recent rumor has come out about the game's release date and already seeing edits to include that speculation. Would appreciate a week or two of semi to avoid disruption until this matter is settled. MASEM ( t) 14:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks (Part of) article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 15:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 15:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users changing the draw number in the table. AxG / ✉ / 10 years of editing 18:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel) 18:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Widr (
talk)
20:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 19:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:FE5:C022:0:1F:ECFF:7C01 ( talk) 19:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A number of IP users keep adding self-promoting edits to this article. See the history page of the article. MorbidEntree - ( Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) 19:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Iris (American band) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Reagan Jones ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Andrew Sega ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous user using different IP addresses is constantly adding incorrect information on Iris (American band), Reagan Jones, and Andrew Sega, even after being warned on her user talk page not to do so. These pages have been vandalized in a similar fashion weeks before (the admin had made a 24 hour protection), so I request the protection to remain a little bit longer this time. -- Λeternus (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done No disruption since the 24th.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon is IP-hopping to harass a registered user using edit summaries on this page. Ogress 22:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Just noticed this (I'm the user the IP has been stalking and harassing; see
incident report for context) - sorry to file a duplicate report.
Funcrunch (
talk)
23:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done No disruption today. This is being discussed
at ANI and admins there can respond as appropriate.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user 87.81.237.158, a sock of banned user Vote (X) for change is at it again on article Daylight Saving Time. Request semi-protect. Aloha27 talk 12:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done Guess you wanted the Daylight article to be protected, which I have done.
Widr (
talk)
12:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user(s) changing "American" to "the United States" even where it makes little grammatical sense and changes quotations. clpo13( talk) 08:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, stopped for the time being, IP got engaged into a discussion.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper repeatedly changing from one variety of English to another without prior discussion (there's no established version of English used in the article, it's about a universal topic, both UK English and American English have been used since the first real "non-stub" version of the article, with about equal share in the article for both varieties, and only one or two words are changed, so the article is no more consistent after the change than before, making it purely disruptive). It's an IP-hopper who does nothing on Wikipedia but promoting US English on multiple articles and claiming that just about everything is American or an American invention, whether it is or not... Thomas.W talk 08:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- The IP-hopper has also repeatedly added the "Use American English" tag on the talk page, without prior discussion, to increase the disruption. Since it's a talk page I'm not requesting protection for it, I just wanted to mention it to illustrate the (deliberate) disruption they're causing... Thomas.W talk 14:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to be over, apologies for not reacting on time.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Article is at AfD and there have been various IPs trying to remove the AfD template. ( [54], [55], [56], [57], [58]) There's also one new account that was opened in order to remove the template as well. I'd do it myself but I was the one who nominated the page and protection might not be proper in this situation. I just need protection until the AfD is up. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Sarahj2107 (
talk)
13:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs around the vacant managerial position. Basement12 (T. C) 11:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack from IP editors and new accounts, mostly IPs. MisterRandomized ( talk) 12:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
12:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – IP doesn't seem to care that their edits don't show. SummerPhD v2.0 13:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple IP editors over months High visibility article with high chance to have recurrent vandalism. Tom (LT) ( talk) 06:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopping vandal keeps adding disruptive material to this page. OuendanL ( talk) 07:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 07:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained deletions by multiple accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 10:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13( talk) 08:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've given it a longer protection since this looks to be a long running issue with the page.
Tokyogirl79
(｡◕‿◕｡)
05:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP-hopping vandal that removes sourced content. Tired of reverting & explaining #dontdothat. Shearonink ( talk) 14:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Could some admin please take a look at the edit history on this article? That IP-hopping vandal is still at it.
Shearonink (
talk)
23:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- They're still at it.
Shearonink (
talk)
00:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- I give up. Taking the article off my watch list. This "apparent vandal" can have at it. Shearonink ( talk) 01:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- They're still at it.
Shearonink (
talk)
00:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Shearonink, I've given the page an indefinite semi-protection. Initially I was only going to do it for a few months, but the page protection history shows that edit protection has been needed quite frequently over the years, enough to where I think that it'd be reasonable for this to be indefinitely protected.
Tokyogirl79
(｡◕‿◕｡)
05:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP-hopping vandal has been removing sourced content from this article and from Van Halen over the past few days. Shearonink ( talk) 23:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- They're still at it. Thanks for taking a look at this article & at
Van Halen - they're persistently removing sourced content from these two articles.
Shearonink (
talk)
00:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- As I said in my RPP for Van Halen, I give up. Taking them both off my Watchlist, this persistent editor who is hopping from one Australian IP to another can have at it. Shearonink ( talk) 01:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Full protection for a few days, to stop repeat revertwarring to reinstate pointless, confusing wording that multiple editors object to on the talk page, and which no one has provided any rationale for, even after a month of discussion being open. WP:BRD (which is optional anyway) has already been satisfied. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 08:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Both editors have been warned. If the issue persists, the accounts will be blocked.
Mike V •
Talk
18:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by User:Huldra/Telstra-socks Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30-sanctions. Huldra ( talk) 16:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC). Huldra ( talk) 16:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A day or two should do it. An inane Twitter war is making its way into the article. An example.— Kww( talk) 02:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
03:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
28 May 2016
Semi-protection: for a week. Edit warring IP that can't spell. argh. Jytdog ( talk) 08:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Can't spell? What utter nonsense. Who knows why Jytdog is inventing things like that, but note that they broke the 3RR and that's been reported.
81.36.240.108 (
talk)
10:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined This is a content dispute and it is now being discussed on the talk page.
Yaris678 (
talk)
10:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 5890+ transclusions counted 1 minute ago. Qualifies as high-use per {{ high-use}}. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 08:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 9800+ transclusions. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 08:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely.
Yaris678 (
talk)
15:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 62600+ transclusions. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 08:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Template protected indefinitely.
Yaris678 (
talk)
15:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive Editing by Hopping IP Address. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism ("jokes") by IPs. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 08:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected by The Anome.
tutterMouse (
talk)
09:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Now downshifted to indef semi-protection. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 11:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
01:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis ( talk) 04:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: WP:BLP violations/vandalism. 71.237.141.40 ( talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An anon IP is persistently edit-warring to include a non-standard footnoting format that is highly inconsistent with many other footnotes to the same database, and with the formatting used throughout WikiProject Comics. I have warned the IP against edit-warring and asked for discussion per WP:BRD, but he refuses. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Today in addition to edit-warring, that anon IP, 86.173.237.249, appears to be trying to evade 3RR by sock-puppeting as 86.173.238.156.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, what they are doing is correct (not sure why they are not discussing though).--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Ymblanter: With all respect, they are inserting non-standard formatting so that some GCD citations in the same article are given one way and some are given another. Additionally, the status quo format is the standard in WikiProject Comics and there was no consensus on any change to this. They are flouting WP:BRD, edit-warring and sock-puppeting. That is not correct. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – This editor needs talkpage access removed. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
00:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the Raptors were eliminated tonight, many trolls (often IPs) haven taken to their page to vandalize. It could use semi-protection for a few days. Amccann421 (talk) 03:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
04:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over past few weeks. Air.light ( talk) 21:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Widr (
talk)
22:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring by a WP:SPA account as well as IP socking by the same user. - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandal with many sockpuppets is back with an IP. -- Bleckter ( talk) 02:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
02:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent WP:LINKSPAM and WP:PROMOTION and deletion of content, from a teenager on an obsessive campaign to promote his own YouTube video, hopping across at least 9 single-purpose "throwaway" accounts over 3.5 years. The SockPuppet Investigation reviewed the details and concluded "There is nothing we can do here" to deter an editor who serially abuses & abandons multiple sock accounts for a day at a time. Rather than protecting the article, another editor suggested blacklisting the specific YouTube video – but the Spam BlackList admin concluded that it wouldn't be effective and recommends long-term semi-protection as the best tool for resolving the problem. Thanks very much for your help. — Patrug ( talk) 09:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:55, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., the last disruptive user was blocked several days ago.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped; otherwise the next edit of the IP should result in a block.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, it looks like another IP did the same sort of thing since you left that comment. Now would probably be a good time to reconsider that decline. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 01:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
01:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: repeatedly recreated hoax page. OnionRing ( talk) 01:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 ( talk) 18:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's been edit-warring a lot here lately, which is unacceptable on any page, let alone a policy page. Please fully protect this for a bit to encourage talk page discussion. ~ Rob Talk 23:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, and both users are reasonable enough.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 71.237.141.40 ( talk) 00:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full-protection: Persistent vandalism by anonymous users placing defamatory statements. Sgwatcher ( talk) 04:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Yes, would welcome additional eyes on this. Sourced/referenced content is being removed, and unsourced/referenced content is being added repeatedly. Previously an IP 202.129.82.110 was the one making those changes and I have left a notes to him explaining WP:CITE, WP:BLP, and WP:VERIFY but now Sgwatcher, a newly created account, is making the exact same changes right after I left the note on the IP's talk page. Zhanzhao ( talk) 07:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- ...And the editor has self-outed himself as the subject in question [59], which now introduces WP:COI into the equation. Zhanzhao ( talk) 07:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation. Qed237 (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have been confirmed by BBC.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalisms by IP users. Akib.H ( talk) 15:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting tired of rolling back minor vandalism of this page. One day of IP protection should be enough. Mtpaley ( talk) 21:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 22:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
29 May 2016
Semi-protection: The page has seen an increase in vandalism from a number of different IP users following news in the media linking him with a move to Liverpool Liam E. Bekker ( talk) 15:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC).
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Majora ( talk) 21:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
21:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection was just declined, leading to more IP vandalism!. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 13:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I wouldn't call this a high-visibility template, but it is transcluded in a number of articles and has been subject to vandalism for a while so I think a year of semi is justified.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several disruptive editing by several different users, hopefully a protection for a month or two should give these vandals a time to settle and stop. Redolta (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This high profile article has a lot of vandalism on a regular basis. Qed237 (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple users and IPs. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 18:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The page was vandalized thre days ago by an IP and then one day later by a registered user. That user was blocked for 31 hours and came back doing the same thing. Got himself rightfully banned. Now I believe he's back as an IP to vandalize it. I'm requesting the page protection to prevent that. If he somehow creates another user, we'll deal with that. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 18:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Same as the argument above. This page has a link for the article mentioned previously and was also target of his vandalism. It also gets some of that from other users/IPs from time to time. It would help a lot if both pages were protected. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 18:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
18:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP users keep adding speculative and unsourced information. – Sabbatino ( talk) 13:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The Article is frequently vandalized by IP users. In other words, the view counts and year of release are frequently altered, not matching the source. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 15:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 15:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done by Foxj.
BethNaught (
talk)
17:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued edits to was, while the chain is still open. Apriestofgix ( talk) 05:51, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated adding of unsourced content and/or promo to the article. The Banner talk 12:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also left a message on the article's talk page.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page's protection recently expired, and IPs and anonymous users started to be disruptive again. Musicpoplover12 ( talk) 15:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
15:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Despite past RMs, people still (re)move the "The" from the title. George Ho ( talk) 08:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the past hours. Borikén ( talk · ctb) 09:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As can be seen here [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] IP editor is constantly making unsourced changes to the figures of dead in the article. Changes that are not per the cited sources. EkoGraf ( talk) 11:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Was semi protected on 25 May for 48 hours. Vandalism (inserting huge chunks of text from another article - the same one every time) from 113.210.0.0/17 address range started again on 29 May. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 12:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
13:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 04:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 04:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 ( talk) 08:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai ( talk) 00:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to one of the band's members mentioning something about their wiki page in a recent live show. Requesting semi-protection until it at least dies down a bit Nbdelboy ( talk) 00:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition and Hoaxes of User:Dan Joshua B. Apura Sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Stellar Skateboard vandal is back . Dismas| (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- You are copy and pasting material from http://www.hizb-australia.org/2016/02/sheikh-muhammad-taqiuddin-al-nabhani/. I am allowed to revert copyright violations. 81.154.213.100 ( talk) 22:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I can't see any recent IP vandalism. The nearest thing is an unconstructive edit by a new user in December 2014. Yaris678 ( talk) 21:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: The template does have 502 transclusions, some of which are BLPs. Maybe that is enough to semi-protect it, as a highly visible template. I'll let someone else make the call on that.
Yaris678 (
talk)
22:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
03:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Syed Hassan Raza Shah 15:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring between (and insertion of hoaxes by) unregistered users. Mdrnpndr ( talk) 18:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: - plenty of IP vandalism over last few days.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 18:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute . Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Why? Just because you have a user name your preferred, redundant version should be honored over the better, non-redundant version? Do you think you WP:OWN that article?
Also, if you're suggesting that we go to the talk page, then why are you not taking your own suggestion by doing that? 2600:100E:B123:68D6:410C:158C:5B11:D169 ( talk) 20:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not the one making the changes. Mlpearc ( open channel) 20:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
But you are the one who falsely believes a page should be "protected" from someone who adds descriptiveness while removing wordiness, even in line with the manual. That really seems like WP:OWN. Tell us, why don't you, why you believe an article should supposedly "not" match that format even though it actually IS an improvement (because mentioning that it's a stage name adds description without adding much wordiness, which I would assume is why the manual was written that way), disruptive editor?
2600:100E:B123:68D6:410C:158C:5B11:D169 ( talk) 20:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please see WP:BRD. Essentially, you made a change that Mlpearc disagreed with and thus reverted. Now, you should have taken to the talk page to explain your position and why the article should read a certain way. Instead, you reverted to your preferred version, which is the start of a edit war. Yes, Mlpearc continued it, but the burden is on you to justify your changes on the talk page. clpo13( talk) 21:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Did I not just do that right here? And if pearc continued that warring with as many reversions, then why does he not get treated with the same warning, per "even if you think you are right" clause at wp:3rr? 2600:100E:B123:68D6:410C:158C:5B11:D169 ( talk) 21:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Nakon
04:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just a short one at this stage, but I have watchlisted also. The IP appears to have been blocked by another admin. Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk)
02:48, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ AustralianRupert: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 06:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 22:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Mattythewhite.
Nakon
04:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13( talk) 21:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 02:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Closedmouth.
Nakon
04:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Jim1138 ( talk) 02:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Newyorkbrad.
Nakon
04:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations and defamatory content. 71.237.141.40 ( talk) 02:31, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Closedmouth.
Nakon
04:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 02:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced and disruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
03:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Girnar ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Girnar Jain temples ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by suspected sock puppet of banned user Goodsenseprevail . David.moreno72 ( talk) 17:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Seems we're having an IP-hopping user continuing to re-add material that's unsourced. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 17:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated attempts to add an unsourced person, name piped to someone else's article. Named account currently blocked but multiple IPs have also been used to make the same edit. Meters ( talk) 19:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper removing sourced text, I'm not at all sure why they claim the source doesn't support - whatever, "the cold of removing context"?. Doug Weller talk 19:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: User: Lamaza62 keeps adding copyrighted material without changes and advertising like lines. Probably PR person/employee. Account only created to edit that specific wiki page. AmblinX 15:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined - No problems in over a week. If problems return, I recommend
WP:ANI.
Yaris678 (
talk)
21:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor on a dynamic IP range is edit warring to make a contentious change in the formatting of the cast list. Examples: [67], [68], [69], [70]. This has been reverted by multiple editors, and attempts to get the IP editor to discuss the matter have failed. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So, a day after the protection expires, the IP is back and vandalizing again. Apparently we need to extend the protection. – Compassionate727 ( T· C) 22:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
22:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.
User:The Anome had fully protected this, presumably because some of the socks reached auto-confirmed, but I think extended-confirmed protection should be sufficient.
Yaris678 (
talk)
10:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- You didn't apply it yet, still have no protection which gonna be so problematic.
KGirlTrucker87
talk
what I'm been doing
11:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure? You have extended confirmed status, so you can edit that page, even when it has extended-confirmed protection. Yaris678 ( talk) 11:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Another explanation is that you are looking at the page this page redirects to.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, now has a WP:BLUELOCK in the redirect. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 11:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- You didn't apply it yet, still have no protection which gonna be so problematic.
KGirlTrucker87
talk
what I'm been doing
11:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Incredibly long log of vandalism on a BLP subject, more than anything beneficial. '''tAD''' ( talk) 09:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I agree about long history, but PC1 should be sufficient because the edit rate isn't too high.
Yaris678 (
talk)
20:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing and vandalism. -- Carsonhk ( talk) 09:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The image has already been uploaded 3 times by one user alone (and then deleted each time), The editor's already blocked indef but I have a feeling they're going to return under a new name so I wonder if protecting this indef may be a good idea ?, Thanks. – Davey2010 Talk 15:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected indefinitely.
Yaris678 (
talk)
21:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brilliant thanks Yaris678 :) – Davey2010 Talk 21:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
30 May 2016
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Same issue as Surface Book mentioned directly above. clpo13( talk) 21:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mike V •
Talk
17:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Just came off protection, and vandalism started right back up. oknazevad ( talk) 15:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be a concerted effort, possibly by more than one person, on this page to remove information deemed undesirable from this article, with no effort to discuss the concerns on the talk page. 331dot ( talk) 18:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
"
Semi-protected I had already applied semi-protection before seeing this. It's been quiet for the last few hours, let's see if that works.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:29, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently IP/vandal-only accounts wanting to remove negative information about the company. Cahk ( talk) 19:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like whitewashing to me. Just make sure that is
WP:DUE and properly sourced.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sixth o f March 01:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 15:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
15:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – While this article has received vandalism in the past by schoolchildren, ever since the musical about the subject IP vandalism has really expanded. A couple more months of semi-protection (this page has been protected repeatedly) should stem the tide. Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk)
17:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – User trying to create article over the redirect. No need to edit this redirect ever, as it redirects to the correct person. Joseph2302 ( talk) 23:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined I can't see any vandalism. There was a persistent editor creating the article. But they haven't undone the redirect to the different spelling of the subjects name (
Jambul Jigauri with no H). That article was created by the same user!
Yaris678 (
talk)
10:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – since its international release, most of the IP editing at the article has generally been disruptive. 4TheWynne (talk) (contribs) 10:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The ip edits are a bit of a mixed bag in terms of quality, but I see few that would be considered disruptive. Declined for now, please relist if things worsen.
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
11:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: requested for a week or so. Persistent vandalism from ips and new accounts; possible new school kids joining in for the current session. Xender Lourdes ( talk) 11:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by an IP-hopping user. May be related to Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/The_UPN_Vandal. clpo13( talk) 22:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all submitted edits in page history have been reverted. — Music1201 talk 00:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of unsourced/speculated titles from multiple IP editors. Alex|The|Whovian ? 00:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued inappropriate, inaccurate and non-conforming edits from IP-hopping editor, whose edits have been reverted by numerous long-standing editors. IP editor will not answer queries on talk page. BMK ( talk) 01:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism. DangerousJXD ( talk) 01:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Requested for three days. Hopping ip addresses are repeatedly adding a derogatory nickname for the subject. Xender Lourdes ( talk) 02:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated insertion of inappropriate content. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus ( talk) 03:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 03:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistant IP vandal/s on the infobox page, claiming that North Korea, China and Cuba supply the RBAF when he/she has no proof to back it up. Ominae ( talk) 09:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection didn't seem appropriate as the problems were primarily anon users. Let's see if they get bored and move on.
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
11:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Uncontrolled editing and addition of unsourced, promotional content by IP users. Request 10-day protection. Nairspecht Converse 06:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit-warring by an editor from Utah with a dynamic IP.
- 07:09, 30 May 2016 IP 174.23.160.130 reverts Toddy1
- 06:42, 30 May 2016 IP 174.23.160.130 reverts Sro23
- 05:51, 30 May 2016 IP 174.23.160.130 reverts Ebyabe
- 21:24, 29 May 2016 IP 174.23.160.146 reverts Sro23
- 07:27, 28 May 2016 IP 174.23.107.42 reverts Favonian over word "Glendale" and adds new changes.
- 18:04, 26 May 2016 IP 174.23.173.58 reverts Sro23 over word "Glendale"
- 18:03, 26 May 2016 IP 174.23.173.58 reverts Sro23 over word "Glendale"
- 23:09, 25 May 2016 IP 75.162.213.245 reverts Ebyabe over word "Glendale"
- 21:30, 23 May 2016 Newname0002 reverts Toddst over word "Glendale"
Toddy1 (talk) 07:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Talk page RM. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 12:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotected I'll leave the move to your since you appear to have evaluated the discussion.
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
11:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there! this IP undergoes vandalism on this page by adding wrong chart peaks. Cartoon network freak ( talk) 09:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated spam of a non-notable person. Joseph2302 ( talk) 22:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 71.237.141.40 ( talk) 04:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Unprotection, Too long to expire. 112.134.80.87 ( talk) 07:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 22:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Salted for one year. --
The Anome (
talk)
22:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 23:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected by Mike V for one week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vanity page recreated 3 times in 20 minutes, with repeated removal of speedy tags. OnionRing ( talk) 01:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 01:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Creation protected by C.Fred.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – there is non capital or capitalization letter of Kean Rabuyo (start from letter small and big A) also from the master sock of TV5Ozamiz. Oripaypaykim (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think someone should make a request at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist so such articles with the same name, regardless of the capitalization, won't be recreated. Sixth o f March 04:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs started up again. Result of reddit nonsense. Majora ( talk) 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ Nakon: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: request of upgrading pending changes to indefinite from 3 days of full protection that is set to expire shortly. The article and it's talk pages have been drawing long term heated vandalism, edits and false statements based clearly on discrimination and prejudice with the use of intimidation, aggression and profanities. There is blatant deletion of reliable secondary published sources. It needs urgent review by admins that are expert in WP:ROYALTY, political dynasties, India, Pakistan, Soviet Union, British colonial history, Hinduism and intelligence agency operations as it has association with the CIA's Operation Cyclone in Afghanistan. An editor that is member of the US Military Auxiliary Radio System is attempting to influence consensus in discussions by hatting sourced information that is critical of CIA operations in the Middle East.-- Int Researcher ( talk) 21:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 21:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Ymblanter. – See
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive#Ankit_Love. It is too soon for a new request. For background, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Love (2nd nomination). It would be inconvenient for the article to remain fully protected throughout an AfD discussion. Some of the statements in your above request are hard to take seriously.
EdJohnston (
talk)
03:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an slow edit war on both this page and Surface Pro 4. Concern highlight of a battery issue. There have been some attempts at getting discussion on the talk page but it seems to move back into a slow edit war with arguments in the comments. PaleAqua ( talk) 21:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected – 2 months. Edit warring by IP-hopper. I am also leaving a warning for
User:TranslucentCloud since they made a total of six reverts during the long war.
EdJohnston (
talk)
03:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs started up again. Result of reddit nonsense. Majora ( talk) 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nakon
04:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ Nakon: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Newly registered editors edit warring. Pending a 3RR action, protect the page to the last stable version please. Xender Lourdes ( talk) 12:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
12:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - repeated IP vandalism, to be compared to 0 useful IP contributions apart from a single typo fix the day the page was started in 2013. -- mfb ( talk) 16:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Widr (
talk)
21:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
31 May 2016
Long term Protection: - Continued edit spat over content, concerning the Ulster Banner & its status in Northern Ireland. GoodDay ( talk) 15:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, removing all content and citations listed. Leaves only short intro paragraph. Summer.zadara ( talk) 16:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined That is not vandalism, that is content dispute regarding the appropriateness of content added by requester.
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
16:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once the last month-long protection expired on May 26, multiple IP's have vandalized the lead. Suspect it is the same disruptive user(s) that made similar edits prior to the last protection. If diffs are needed, ping me and I will provide them. Recommend another month, or possibly two this time. GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Widr (
talk)
20:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding WP:OR and directing personal attacks on users. I've not reverted his last edit. Vin09 (talk) 06:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
CambridgeBayWeather Multiple IPs started again adding info of
WP:OR.--
Vin09
(talk)
11:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined There have been exactly three edits from IPs to this article since April 9. Protection simply isn't justified, and appealing to multiple admins won't change that.
Katie
talk
13:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection just for a day perhaps. An ip whose edits had been reverted has been hopping and continuing vandalising from other ip addresses, just for trolling and getting attention. A day would be enough to wean him off. Xender Lourdes ( talk) 14:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
16:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User was previously blocked for WP:NOTHERE and using Wikipedia pages as a webhost. Since being blocked they are using their talk page for same purpose. Requesting talk page access be revoked. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done Access revoked, that is.
Widr (
talk)
18:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 11:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk)
14:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requested this level of protection before, but I was advised there wasn't enough activity to justify it. Certainly there is enough in the history now, which in some cases has involved multiple "new" accounts making the same edits (possible SPI is needed). Recommend protecting this for at least a week. GoneIn60 ( talk) 12:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 12:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Justification – Here are the examples over the past couple weeks:
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Part of the news cycle in India. Semi protection for a few days till everything cools off. The Masked Man of Mega Might ( talk) 12:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism. Inpea33 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Vandalism.
- Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
06:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's not one particular editor vandalizing the article. FrB.TG ( talk) 08:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's mainly IP 89.xxx Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. George Ho ( talk) 07:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filipz123 sockpuppets. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 16:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Histbuf111 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Vanjagenije.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filipz123 sockpuppets. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 16:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked:
Histbuf111 (
talk ·
contribs) blocked by
Vanjagenije.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This person is adding unsourced content to this article. Pls see page history. . μ Talk 00:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- I dont think its required anymore. I left a message here. μ Talk 05:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor
Lectonar (
talk)
07:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
09:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Edit warring IP has returned. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors are repeatedly adding contentious, poorly sourced "controversy" sections. For example: [71], [72], [73], [74], [75]. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 02:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring. IP calls edits by other editor vandalism. Since both editors are way over 3RR, full protection might be necessary. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Looks like a BLP.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Died in 1999 is not really a BLP.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Basketball vandalism by IPs over the past few days; more likely tonight. Dustin (talk) 03:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Jono Pryor & Ben Boyce
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Spike of high level of IP vandalism and will continue over the next 48 hours Dlpkbr ( talk) 04:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. StarScream1007 ►Talk 22:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Echoedmyron ( talk) 22:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This has recently become a common target of a LTA edit warrior. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Martial arts vandal for details. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 22:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:33, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 ( talk) 00:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Resumption of IP vandalism. LynwoodF ( talk) 16:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A new user has repeatedly removed the same well sourced content from the page.
This appears to be said user's only purpose in editing Wikipedia. The new user began 4 days ago.
1st removal,
2nd removal,
3rd removal,
4th removal I have asked the user to discuss on talk which he has not done. I have attempted to improve the article to address the user's criticisms without deleting well sourced content, but his repeated blanking of the section makes it difficult. I am requesting a week of semi-protection to allow for continued improvement without it leading to an edit war. I will refrain from further edits until a decision on protection is reached.
Nowa (
talk)
17:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page revisions must now be reviewed, but vandalism is STILL persistent. I requested the page to be editable only by registered members, but the page only received a review-before-publish protection... and that isn't working.. . CoolCanuck eh? 18:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected.. Few IP edits. Pending changes seems to be working.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 19:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too many edits for PC.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Months of POV edits by IPs and new accounts claiming that this republic is still in existence despite the title and the articles Taiwan (i.e., Republic of China) and China (i.e., The People’s Republic of China). Meters ( talk) 20:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:16, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 21:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ok, IP's should not edit this obscure disputed page. We have constant edit war for months, please protect this page for at least a month now.!. Axiomus ( talk) 13:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
08:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 20:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Apparently new user persisting with a disputed edit repeatedly. Kautilya3 ( talk) 21:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Persistent edit warring on above FA by new user User:Civfanatic with no effort on his part to provide reliable secondary sources despite requests by me. Mayasandra ( talk) 22:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP's continuing to change between Infobox Person and Musical artist, without discussion or consensus. Mlpearc ( open channel) 14:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I can only see one IP making one such edit. How many such edits were there? When were they? Yaris678 ( talk) 15:29, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined Premature. No where near the traffic or problem to lock it up just yet. If it was only the IP and he were to continue to war over an info box, I would be more inclined to semiprotect a bit and block him. Still, I recommend dropping a note on his talk page inviting to the talk page first. Give him a chance to cooperate.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Brief period of full protection would be helpful as this is discussed on the talk page. ~ Rob Talk 18:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined There has only been 7 edits today, and the traffic before today is light, many days with no edits. Can't really justify locking it down at this time. No one has broken 3RR either.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
I request a change to the Donald Trump page, it gives him several titles in the info box such as "Cahirman of the Trump Organization" and "Republican nominee for President"". I cannot find another company chairman with titles in the info box and zero previous nominees of the Republican/Democratic Party have had a title in the info box in the past, or presently. Both these titles should be removed. Trump is not an officeholder /info/en/?search=Template:Infobox_officeholder Jzema ( talk) 21:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done You can always use the talk page. That kind of change is going to take a consensus anyway, so it is moot.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection. Workerwiki ( talk) 07:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 10:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 10:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator
Zzuuzz.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
11:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ CambridgeBayWeather: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 15:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
User(s)
blocked.
Mike V •
Talk
17:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Article was again disruptively edited by the same dynamic ip only hours after the end of the last protection period.-- Phso2 ( talk) 11:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined I wouldn't call that disruptive. The IP added some unsourced content, but that's not the end of the world. Try discussing it on the article talk page. Try Google, you may be able to find sources yourself. If you are convinced the new content is wrong, explain why on the talk page.
Yaris678 (
talk)
15:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- This content has already been added and reverted several times (
[76],
[77],
[78]
[79]etc) by some user who uses dynamic ip on several pages, and only pops up regularly to put again and again the same unsourced content. That may not be the end of the world, but basically the solution proposed here is merely to revert ad nauseam...--
Phso2 (
talk)
17:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- I know it's hard to discuss things with a dynamic IP, but here are two things that are worth a try:
- Explain on the talk page what is wrong with the new content.
- Give reasons for your reverts in your edit summaries. If you've added an explanation to the talk page, you can just say "see the talk page". I know you can't do anything about other editors when they revert, but its worth a try with your reversions.
- If you do those things, and the dynamic IP ignores it, I'd be happy to protect the page.
- Yaris678 ( talk) 18:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- I know it's hard to discuss things with a dynamic IP, but here are two things that are worth a try:
- This content has already been added and reverted several times (
[76],
[77],
[78]
[79]etc) by some user who uses dynamic ip on several pages, and only pops up regularly to put again and again the same unsourced content. That may not be the end of the world, but basically the solution proposed here is merely to revert ad nauseam...--
Phso2 (
talk)
17:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppet. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 16:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
-
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
20:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)