- 2016
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Details: Since 3 January 2016, some anonymous users from Turkey are vandalizing a well-sourced article related to Russo-Turkish wars, “
Battle of Erzurum (1877)”, by changing the number of Russian casualties from 400-600, which is supported by sources, to unreferenced 3,000-4,000 (
[1],
[2],
[3]),
720,000 (
[4]), 725,000 (
[5])
and even 850,000 (
[6]), despite the fact that these figures have nothing to do with the sources cited and the whole text of the article and are not supported by anything whatsoever.
Eriba-Marduk (
talk)
19:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Don't know why it didn't go through, but it has now.
Katie
talk
21:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
20:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of sockpuppet of
site banned editor
User:Fangusu. The sock master has been editing this page at least almost once a day since January 28.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a little on the lengthy side for a talk page but it's been edited solely by the socks since October.
Katie
talk
21:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism regarding
John Scott (ice hockey).
Yosemiter (
talk)
21:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
IP harassment/vandalism
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by a user indefinitely banned for harassment and trolling.
Volunteer Marek (
talk)
21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by FPAS
Katie
talk
21:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and BLP violations being added by various IP's. Subject is "in the news" after being traded to a different team - a short period of semi might be needed.
Fyddlestix (
talk)
17:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by some irate customers.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
18:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More of the "Traitor" nonsense that it was recently protected for...
Scr★pIron
IV
19:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30.
nableezy -
20:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 20:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
20:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism from a set of IPs, possibly socks from banned user Devonexpressbus. Possible COI issues and adding unreferenced / OR sentences.
NordicDragon
Talkpage
21:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lectonar: can I ask your decision to be revieved in light of recent events please. Thanks
NordicDragon
Talkpage
15:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- As it seems a static IP... I reconsider and say:
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.. protecting an article because of one user disrupting is like shooting on sparrows with a cannon. Cheers.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing/Addition of
Unsourced content .
Musa
Talk ☻
14:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism caused by recent transfer move,
.
Blethering
Scot
20:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Though today's vandal has already been blocked, this BLP has a long history of persistent vandalism.
Deli nk (
talk)
15:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Everymorning
(talk)
16:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Consistent running joke that this person is older than he is.
'''tAD''' (
talk)
16:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This same disruption to the birth date appears to be the only thing unconfirmed users are interested in, so I've reset PC as it doesn't seem to be helping —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple and persistent vandalism attempts.
Will2022 (
talk
17:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In addition to quite common vandalism, hoe is a slang term for a person, usually female who acts slutty.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
17:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users.
Emotionalllama (
talk)
14:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Cashewnøtt (
talk)
14:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long term attempts to create an unsourced promotional page, with continued removal of sourced content.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Zzuuzz.
tutterMouse (
talk)
18:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of edit warring by IPs in the last hour. Associated with change in subject's job.
Hack (
talk)
13:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – player is negotiating a transfer to scottish football team today, blp vandalism is already evident today and is highly likely to continue for a few days.
ℕ
ℱ
13:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal who keeps resetting their modem to avoid blocks.
Emotionalllama (
talk)
14:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit-warring by a stubborn IP who refuses to listen to anyone.
Frankie
talk
10:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – two different IPs adding "transsexual"...
Nomoskedasticity (
talk)
10:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined 2 Instances in 2 days. Relist if it persists.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection Persistent addition of Vandalism by
Dan Joshua B. Apura IP Sockpuppet.
112.198.82.102 (
talk)
11:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
pending changes consistent malicious vandalism by unregistered editors
Bipandboppop (
talk)
00:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
01:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A quick overview of the page history shows a full-blown content dispute; in an area supposedly under 1RR, this is even more troublesome. .
Vanamonde93 (
talk)
02:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined For now; the talkpage is used for good effect now. I will leave a message there, and watchlist.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours (window closes 11pm UTC tonight).
Qed237
(talk)
13:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP edits by chronicly socking
blocked user (see also
List of awards and nominations received by Chris Rock) –
Jason A. Quest (
talk)
13:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated childish personal attacks by IP-hopper (against
User:Materialscientist).
Thomas.W
talk
14:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
23:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: New user
Atomicperspective posting malicious content is believed to be a disgruntled former intern against whom Independent Institute has a court-issued restraining order and who is subject to arrest in California under a court-issued Ramey warrant.
InformWik (
talk)
02:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
13:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to BLP by various IPs related to subject's possible imprisonment.
Egghead06 (
talk)
09:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Edit warring over uninvolved admin edit that was the result of a RFC review.
[7]
AlbinoFerret
04:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: I would tend to fully protect for some days. Second opinion please?
Lectonar (
talk) 11:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Lectonar (
talk)
11:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 19 of latest 50 edits made by IP users, one even entering not referenced data that is already cited earlier in the article.
Arius1998 (
talk)
06:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, this is not BLP, and vandalism is infrequent--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – A lot of NPOV policy violations at the moment, considering the controversy surrounding his playing in the NHL All-Star game. Pending changes protection is proving to be insufficient.
ElementBroccoli (
talk)
00:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection Repeated deletion of sourced material, by an IP and also by new accounts. The IP claims to be an employee of the bank. IP has failed to follow the advice he was given at
the Teahouse and has not discussed on the article talk page. --
David Biddulph (
talk)
10:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam for non-notable company created 4 times in a week.
NeemNarduni2 (
talk)
11:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs have been making the same disruptive edit for months. There is no reason why editors should have to waste time reverting this. Please semi this page.
RGloucester —
☎
22:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism/disruptive editing over 4+ weeks (meaning since the previous page protection ran out on Jan 3, 2016).
KungAvSand (
talk)
01:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Absolutely agree. Plus, Julius Caesar is a big target to me.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
02:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected I hear he wasn't that big ;-)
Lectonar (
talk)
09:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And now no good edits from IPs (minus the reversion of the bad edits). Plus a suppression of a revision.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
02:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: Although protected by Katie, understandably, she has a lot of faith on IP editors. On the other hand, even with low editing, there have been reverts. The protection will expire soon. --
George Ho (
talk)
04:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Recent death, several edits by unregistered IPs not in line with BLP policy.
Mike1901 (
talk)
09:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Frankie
talk
11:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
13:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes to incorrect information by IP vandals.
Krimuk|90 (
talk)
06:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
NeoBatfreak (
talk)
22:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done.
NeoBatfreak, what I see is that you and some IPs have a disagreement about content, That does not make them vandals, and protection is not used as a way to help the autoconfirmed user win the argument. I also don't see any attempt to discuss the issue on the talk page, which is what you are supposed to do, or any addition of sources, which is the way to win the argument.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection at least until
his son stops
running for president Most edits in the past month or two have been IP vandalism or reverting of IP vandalism, and it's only going to get worse if the Trump campaign keeps going.
p
b
p
23:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Absolutely, as he is related to the Donald Trump thing, which strongly attracts vandalism and other bad-faith edits.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
07:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
wL<
speak·
check>
07:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistant long-term vandalism. I can't believe how much vandalism has been going on in this article. Has been a long problem and the problematic edits must stop.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
05:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
05:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending Changes is not proving productive on this page. Edits by non-autoconfirmed users are all vandalism. I believe it previously had indef semi protection.
William Avery (
talk)
10:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I see that recently at least two edits of non-autoconfirmed users were accepted, one on 18 January and one on 25 December. Whereas it is true that most of such edits are vandalism, the edits are not that frequent, and I believe we should give a chance to non-autoconfirmed users to improve the article. I recommend extending pending changes instead.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
5 albert square (
talk)
00:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: A lot of unsigned users and users not autoconfirmed are repeatedly trying to add too many specific details to the Plot section, which are in violation of
WP:PLOTSUM.
Parsley Man (
talk)
04:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In addition to the plot size issue, I see lots of other vandalism including section blanking; one vandal has been blocked.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user is now pinging other users, discussing articles and now fighting other users while under a 7 day block. He also mentions another user is not welcome on his talk page, forgetting the talk page is for the benefit of the project, and is not his personal domain. .
Legacypac (
talk)
20:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. By all means ask the blocking admin. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
20:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
LynwoodF (
talk)
17:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: Protecting administrator not very active at the moment. There have been reverts on unsourced claims or vandalism.
George Ho (
talk)
04:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - only one IP in last few months.
Alexius
Horatius
19:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
23:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Report those socks to AIV, please? I'll be busy for a bit.
Katie
talk
23:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive edits and edit-warring based on personal interpretations by an
WP:SPA IP. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
13:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, IP started discussion at the talk page and was so far ignored by other users.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
21:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject just told the Detroit Lions he is "planning to retire" and IP address are editing saying he is retired violating
WP:CRYSTALBALL. Currently protected to all edits are being reviewed, I think it should elevated to semi-protected to where no IP addresses should edit. Rockchalk
717
22:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Adding on, this page is receiving an edit every minute and has 36 pending requests--Rockchalk
717
22:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That will put it one week after the rosters unlock - hopefully the Lions will figure it out by then. (But we are talking about the Lions here.)
Katie
talk
23:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent edits that violate
WP:NPOV,
WP:V, and
WP:3RR.
Boomer Vial
Holla
16:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
16:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Boomer Vial: The ANEW report by itself is sufficient. If there is only one user involved there is no need to file a request here – it will be declined. Thanks —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
MusikAnimal: Ok, I understand. The ANEW was just taking a long time to go through, and the user was continually edit-warring. But they have been blocked, so all is resolved. Thanks! :)
Boomer Vial
Holla
16:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Broadcast of the league is only in Pakistan, UAE & U.K. Various IPs are putting false information that it will be broadcast in India, australia, New Zealand, Sri lanka (which is a lie) to get money from channel subscription through people of those nations. Read my
both edit summaries.
Sunray9 (
talk)
17:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent trolling by banned user.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
18:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Der
yck C.
20:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Various types of ongoing vandalism
Deku-shrub (
talk)
19:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Der
yck C.
20:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get this semi-protected just for a day or so? Persistent vandalism from IP/newly registered users. thanks!.
Mike1901 (
talk)
20:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing. High level of IP vandalism.
MYS
77
✉
14:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just one IP...180.xx
Lectonar (
talk)
14:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See edit history. Edit warring over recent addition.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
16:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs, just like article
Syco (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs), protected (till 16 February 2016) earlier today
DVdm (
talk)
17:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
DoRD (
talk)
18:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: A is finished and possibly ready to be move to mainspace. --
5.228.176.80 (
talk)
09:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done --
zzuuzz
(talk)
13:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring/content dispute.
Boomer Vial
Holla
10:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Yes...it is exactly that: a content dispute. As i can see there was no use of the article's talk-page; everybody is communicating more or less by edit summaries.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs and a user
DVdm (
talk)
15:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
15:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs. -
DVdm (
talk)
15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Gilliam. —
MusikAnimal
talk
15:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: A draft located at
User:Arsonal/MyAnimeList is finished and possibly ready to be moved to mainspace.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
02:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Pinging @
RHaworth:, the protecting admin--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done (for the bot)
Lectonar (
talk)
09:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Widr (
talk)
07:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Except that there has been nothing but disruption since January, apart from the times the article was protected.
Widr (
talk)
08:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Ok.. you feel strongly about the article...there was disruption and two good faith edits, imho. Wikipedia is supposed to be the encyclopedia that everyone can edit, which means that we should keep open this option unless there is strong disruption. If this picks up in frequency, please relist. Cheers.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/addition of content that is totally unrelated to the subject.
Israel's
Son
08:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
13:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of uinsourced changes to league table regarding promotion and relegation.
Qed237
(talk)
15:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, lengthy log.
'''tAD''' (
talk)
18:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. lenghty but not all ip-edits are vandalism; overall frequency very low
Lectonar (
talk)
07:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warrior. I've made a report at
WP:ANEW about their seven reverts, but maybe this queue will move more quickly. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
05:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Really just one editor here...
Lectonar (
talk)
07:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I just reverted IP vandalism that survived for 6 months and over a year.
Elvey(
t•
c)
06:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This page needs more watchers; edit frequency very low. I have watchlisted myself.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.RenRen070193 07:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing last week (see also article page history for justification).RenRen070193 07:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
01:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. It doesn't seem all that persistent.
only (
talk)
04:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP addresses.
Fbdave (
talk)
10:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, immediately after previous protection expiration
DVdm (
talk)
11:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Eperoton (
talk)
14:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article has quited down since. Re-list if situation worsens.
Alexius
Horatius
03:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection. KC M. 19:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Not done - No reason for full protection given, none apparent. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: The word "incorrectly" continues to be re-added by IPs; page has already been temporarily semi-protected twice. There might be another solution, but I don't know what.
pʰeːnuːmuː →
pʰiːnyːmyː →
ɸinimi →
fiɲimi
20:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Lillian Garcia screwed up on RAW and announced them as Grammy winning. They're not musicians. IP editors fail to see that.
Crash
Under
ride
01:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should let it blow over.
only (
talk)
04:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Edit warring on the addition of a fringe theory on sexism (which really does not belong in that article).
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
04:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
Hugh (
talk)
03:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Upswing in level of IP vandalism. A brief semi until the silliness passes would be helpful.
oknazevad (
talk)
04:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Who knwos when the legend that is John Scott will die down, though...
only (
talk)
04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Eben Pagan and David DeAngelo
Edit request: Pages are currently salted after deletion review. Request edit to a redirection to
The Syndicate (group).
Spectra239 (
talk)
01:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
- pinging @
User:RHaworth. He salted the second one.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Kudpung protected the other article, pinging.
tutterMouse (
talk)
15:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I think
Kudpung is no longer an admin; a loss, I must say.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Oh, that is disappointing, I'd still welcome his opinion though.
tutterMouse (
talk)
18:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done (for the bot)
Katie
talk
04:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
RHaworth.
Katie
talk
04:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protection – This has been recreated over the past few days over and over again
.
Wgolf (
talk)
03:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
03:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IPs persistently changing first word to "Somalians", contrary to sources and article title, without discussion.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
21:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
21:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
22:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
22:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Tbhotch's archives
Indefinite semi and move protection. These pages should not be edited or moved
[8]
[9] without a real reason. Requesting per
WP:UPPROT.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
02:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism issues by unregistered.
TheBellaTwins1445(
talk) 6:25, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
NYBrook098 (
talk)
21:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done once, protection expired,
Done again. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protection: Thrice-created page on an individual determined via AfD to fail WP:N. —
swpb
T
22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by
BethNaught (
talk ·
contribs). --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours.
Qed237
(talk)
22:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by
Number 57 (
talk ·
contribs). --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Bit of a vandal magnet of late.
Andy Dingley (
talk)
23:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism over past 24 hours.
: Noyster
(talk),
00:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
17:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The managerial change is sourced now. If disruption resumes, re-report.
Katie
talk
21:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – logo twice replaced with a swastika.
Philafrenzy (
talk)
20:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
21:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
02:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
01:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
02:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 16:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined @
Wiki tamil 100: Same as last decline... no one has edited this page other than you in six months, so there's no reason to protect it. More at
Wikipedia:Protection policy —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long term attempts to create an unsourced data, facts are mixed with opinions, continued removal of sourced content. 17:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent recent IP vandalism, i.e.
2 January 2016 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Midnightblueowl (
talk •
contribs)
18:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Many good-faith edits —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated promotional and copyright violation edits involving several accounts, apparent
WP:COI.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
19:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Someone tried to add unsourced statement about this actor. There have been reverts on adding it.
George Ho (
talk)
19:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been created 4 times in the past day. Article is about a non-notable "sports reporter", most likely a kid in school. Request page be
WP:SALT'ed .
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated promotional and copyright violation edits involving several accounts, apparent
WP:COI.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
19:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes:
BLP policy violations – Someone tried to add unsourced statement about this actor. There have been reverts on adding it.
George Ho (
talk)
19:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been created 4 times in the past day. Article is about a non-notable "sports reporter", most likely a kid in school. Request page be
WP:SALT'ed .
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing AfD notice.
[10]
[11].
Jbh
Talk
13:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, The IP has now started engaging on the AfD, so hopefully they'll understand how it works. Relist if they don't stop.
Ged
UK
13:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
fully protected: Disruptive editing by some users caused to Edit-War. revision & editing without citing the source by
Panam2014 happened several times.
K!lluminati (
talk)
14:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It is too false. The problem is in the module not in template. Kiluminati could be a
Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. The account appeared in December and he speaks of vandalism. It removes sources such as Masdar speaking advances loyalists and source map with Al Masira , official media Houthi . This is unacceptable. I gave a source. --
Panam2014 (
talk)
15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Heavy disruption from a known IP troll. --
JBL (
talk)
15:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
only (
talk)
18:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing AfD notice.
[12]
[13].
Jbh
Talk
13:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, The IP has now started engaging on the AfD, so hopefully they'll understand how it works. Relist if they don't stop.
Ged
UK
13:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
fully protected: Disruptive editing by some users caused to Edit-War. revision & editing without citing the source by
Panam2014 happened several times.
K!lluminati (
talk)
14:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It is too false. The problem is in the module not in template. Kiluminati could be a
Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. The account appeared in December and he speaks of vandalism. It removes sources such as Masdar speaking advances loyalists and source map with Al Masira , official media Houthi . This is unacceptable. I gave a source. --
Panam2014 (
talk)
15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Heavy disruption from a known IP troll. --
JBL (
talk)
15:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
only (
talk)
18:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IP addresses.
Coderzombie (
talk)
12:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NativeForeigner
Talk
15:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-created twice in two days after AFD, along with fork
Simonyan Alen. See also
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/InnaBeglaryan.
NeemNarduni2 (
talk)
14:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fork already creation-protected
Lectonar (
talk)
14:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several recent daily edits by
socks of
site banned editor
User:Fangusu.
Steel1943 (
talk)
15:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
tutterMouse (
talk)
17:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Part of a series of article affected by
this ANI thread. All other affected articles were protected. A rangeblock was put in place, but the IP is slipping through it.
Scr★pIron
IV
16:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Future Perfect at Sunrise. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks from IPs and new users.
Emotionalllama (
talk)
16:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – no indication of notability, re-created three times in one week.
NeemNarduni2 (
talk)
12:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected.
Ged
UK
13:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's really going to be no end to this IP person trying to erase references to Dards.
—Largo Plazo (
talk)
13:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected As the frequency is so low, pending changes should be enough.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. This page was protected early last month, but for only 4 days. —
Bruce1ee
talk
13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ged
UK
13:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been created and deleted too many times.
JMHamo (
talk)
13:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected.
Ged
UK
13:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP-user calling the subject a "far-left extremist activist." This has resulted in a massive edit war.
Crboyer (
talk)
03:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by PoV IP.
Doug Weller
talk
07:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Frankie
talk
07:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Kharkiv07 (
T)
22:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
23:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Some good faiths edits.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - This is CNN Philippines Article has Place of Canada has affiliate of CNN Philippines As CNN Philippines-Canada Vandal.
121.1.31.102 (
talk)
00:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes.
Bobherry Userspace
Talk to me!
Stuff I have done
02:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Increased disruptive IP activity since caucus.
CFredkin (
talk)
03:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by
User:MariaJaydHicky.
Binksternet (
talk)
07:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – as protection previous added content of pokemon vandal in December 17, 2015 is now unprotected.
Oripaypaykim
(talk)
11:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive edit continues after two expiration of page protections. Users and IPs are keen on their own view that could link or against with
Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.
Antan
O
03:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
RegentsPark: any thoughts on this? You were last to protect and last to revert at the page.
only (
talk)
04:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Not sure if it is necessary. IP action is limited and we have a registered user making changes. --
regentspark (
comment)
16:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I looked at this last night and decided to let it cook for a while. No changes since then, so I don't think any protection is necessary, but I'll defer to someone who knows the subject matter and the arb case a little better.
Katie
talk
16:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
02:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
20:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This page is about the book, not the film series, why all the disruptive to this page is amazing, I would think this would be true for the film series therefore I think Perm-semi is appropriate. It would be much easier to handle the edit requests.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
03:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I daresay the book is way more popular than the films, although in a more hidden way. I'll try PC first.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
23:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent tagging by IP addresses - at least one probably a socking recently banned user. Please semi protect for a month or so, til they get bored and go away. Thanks.
Jytdog (
talk)
01:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There are three recent
deletion log entries.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk)
02:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Insistence by IP address to spam the page of excess material against consensus of talk page
131.91.7.2 (
talk)
18:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Enigma
msg
06:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has returned barely after the former protection expired.
Jamie Tubers (
talk)
22:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Protection expired on December 15 and there's been exactly one user edit since.
Katie
talk
01:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism.
Jamie Tubers (
talk)
22:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
01:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Interstates and other highway articles
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppet vandalism using unconfirmed accounts.
Imzadi 1979
→
15:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined For all; sockpuppet accounts have been blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Until tomorrow when the sockmaster makes another new account or two, or rotates onto a new IP,
Lectonar.
Imzadi 1979
→
16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ――
Phoenix7777 (
talk)
20:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Apparently people have difficulty differentiating between the actor and his roles. ‖
Ebyabe
talk -
General Health ‖
21:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Wgolf (
talk)
00:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
00:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Interstates and other highway articles
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppet vandalism using unconfirmed accounts.
Imzadi 1979
→
15:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined For all; sockpuppet accounts have been blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Until tomorrow when the sockmaster makes another new account or two, or rotates onto a new IP,
Lectonar.
Imzadi 1979
→
16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ――
Phoenix7777 (
talk)
20:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Apparently people have difficulty differentiating between the actor and his roles. ‖
Ebyabe
talk -
General Health ‖
21:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Wgolf (
talk)
00:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
00:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism.
Lapadite (
talk)
19:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations. There are unconfirmed reports that this 7-time F1 champion may have died and editors are adding the news as fact and without reliable sources.
Dawnseeker2000
19:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
20:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP vandalism.
Firebrace (
talk)
11:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection. wiki tamil 100 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined No reason given and no vandalism to justify protection --
GB
fan
12:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Jetstreamer
Talk
14:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Just a disagreement in the reading of available sources (and some overenthusiastic editing); please use the article's talk-page to hash it out.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection. wiki tamil 100 11:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Not done Image(s) deleted.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Publicists trying to promote their websites by adding review links. Please grant protection.
Nairspecht (
talk)
11:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done The user who is adding the link is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection wouldn't avail to anything. I would start by talking to him.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Amaury (
talk)
14:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Geryhall31 (
talk)
22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Anon user/s keeps on adding POV statements in this article after the championship series finished yesterday evening. The anon is now engaging in an edit war to keep his POV paragraph there.
WayKurat (
talk)
04:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 09:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined I don't see vandalism, I see disagreement. Use the article's talk-page please.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of
disruptive editing by way of addition of
unverifiable information that lead to the previous page blocks. A permanent block is needed, to continue preventing this type of editing.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of non-sourced material.
Amaury (
talk)
04:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring by
109.65.53.175 (
talk ·
contribs), on this and other articles in breach of
WP:OVERLINK. According to their talk page, it looks like this has happened under another IP address previously. –
SchroCat (
talk)
23:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over whether to embed the film in the article, link to the film on Commons, or do neither. Some editors are reverting despite discussion on the talk page to overturn or keep with the original consensus to include only a link.
clpo13(
talk)
05:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., semi-protection against socks should be sufficient at this point.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: There have been reverts and some good edits in the past thirty days. --
George Ho (
talk)
06:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Repeated Name change that should remain as the person is known today "Mahidevran Sultan" or simply "Mahidevran". Several IP address and users only mentioning one source while constantly editing (deleting) other relevant sources. All sources should be valued and shown into the article rather than mentioning just one (in this case, Leslie P. Peirce's book) source of one's interest. Please protect the article in it's current position after reviewing the sources. Thanks (
talk)
19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Katie
talk
03:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
03:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection. For some reason, this obscure page is a major Balkan IP trollfest. After I improved it significantly based on hard references, revert hell broke loose. I don't see it improved by an anon anytime soon.
No such user (
talk)
22:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also gave the 3RR warning to your registered user and I'll give him the ARBMAC warning in about two minutes. I'm broadly construing.
Katie
talk
03:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from several IP addresses (probably one person). Disruptive edits keep happening all the time..
Give Your
a Break
19:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
21:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP repeatedly inserting wild non-
WP:RS claims.
[14].
Please revert him/her and protect the article.
Zezen (
talk)
20:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
only (
talk)
21:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: This article has been recreated multiple times after multiple CSDs with the same content by different users, so it needs to be salted. Thank you.
In veritas (
talk)
01:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected
Katie
talk
02:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: The previous 2-day semi-protections have been useless as disruption (including unexplained removals of text) keeps coming back soon after they expire. It will likely get worse if not semi-protected again soon and for much longer than before.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
17:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I agree.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – User
72.235.27.231 (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS) keeps adding unsourced content
.
epicgenius (
talk)
18:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. —
MusikAnimal
talk
19:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Page is still being used as grounds for constant edit warring. The editors involved have started to use the talk page, but are still at odds on which revision is correct. Page needs to be fully protected (admins only), until a correct version can be decided.
Boomer Vial
Holla
23:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
00:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: rsistent
disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing sourced information.
shαnєч
σf rєdhill (RH1)
15:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – If I could choose "all of the above" in the semi-protection list on Twinkle, I would. There are daily edits by IPs that either give incorrect information, change things unnecessarily, or simply remove things from the page.
Primefac (
talk)
16:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP.
Qed237
(talk)
20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., edits are infrequent, and I configured pending changes instead of semi-protection. Let us see how they would work.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
Disruptive editing, still multiple persistent vandalism issues by unregistered users.
TheBellaTwins1445(
talk) 4:02, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed as soon as the previous protection expired.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent editing tests since the last two months. Article requires protection, mainly for its stability.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
12:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Whole lot of vandalism and removal of content.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
20:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protection: Nonsense page created six times total, four times in roughly the last month. —
swpb
T
20:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is continuously vandalized by an editor for the last couple of days. He dont have a user id so its impossible to send a message and he continues vandalizing everyday. Its really difficult to clean up an article every single day so i would like to make this article temporarily protected. .
Arjunkrishna90 (
talk)
02:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: persistent insertion of a false rumour about the name of the son of a minor pop star, going on for about three weeks and shows no sign of dying down. Not all IPs, but the ones with usernames all seem to be new accounts and so should be covered by semi-protection. --
Nicknack009 (
talk)
14:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move-protection: - Page repeatedly moved to
The Expulsion of the Arnauts and reverted - discussion has been started at
Talk:The expulsion of the Albanians by a third editor, but neither of the edit warring editors has yet joined in -
Arjayay (
talk)
14:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Move protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users adding promotional content. The page is currently being rewritten since it looks like an advertisement.
Nairspecht (
talk)
12:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a stomping ground for IP's and anonymous editors to add-in
original research.
livelikemusic
talk!
13:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been vandalized by multiple accounts, was restored to a version almost a month old.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
15:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Talk page discussion is ongoing. (Note: Page already has Pending Changes protection.) --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
15:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again Vandalism after Protektion lifted.
Kante4 (
talk)
18:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
aqwfyj
Talk/
Contribs
23:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. --
Amanda
(aka DQ)
11:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To prevent
this from happening again. --
Cheers,
Ril
ey
07:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template protected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
13:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
17:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Question: Since you are the only editor to ever edit the page, what persistent vandalism are you talking about? --
GB
fan
12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined--
Ymblanter (
talk)
07:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
16:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There has been almost 70 edits, most of them reverts, on this page in the last six days. Editors are not using edit summaries, and need to take this dispute to the talk page.
Boomer Vial
Holla
16:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined If it is an edit war, it is a very slow one. You have warned, correctly (albeit for 2015 in film), so this is more a question of implementing blocks after reporting at the perinent noticeboards.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lectonar: That would be
WP:ANEW, correct?
Boomer Vial
Holla
06:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The last 22 consecutive edits to this article are flat reverts, mostly by autoconfirmed users.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
17:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now....Hmmmm...IP 81xxx has been blocked; the 2 warring autoconfirmed users, (
User:Satesclop and
User:JaumeR) are 2 RR both.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I have warned both; if it continues please report at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring .
Lectonar (
talk)
19:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, I appreciate that, but I would like to draw your attention to
this diff, covering 23 revisions by 9 different users, in which the only content that changed was one diacritic. But I defer to your judgement.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
23:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Dennis Bratland (
talk)
18:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. BLP it is, silly vandalism in some few instances it is too.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP continues to add an infobox containing false, unverifiable information. --
Local hero
talk
19:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It appears to be multiple IP addresses so I hope you'll reconsider. Regardless, I'll follow the process you've suggested. --
Local hero
talk
21:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism since the protection was lifted. Protected four times in the past. I request semi or PC protection for least six months, as the page still receives 2,000 views a day.
Esquivalience
t
21:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
22:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.
The Masked Man of Mega Might (
talk)
21:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Philip J Fry /
talk
22:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, which will surely garner a lot of attention in the media.
Kevin Rutherford (
talk)
22:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Yamaguchi先生.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Heavy IP based editing in lead up to political anniversary. .
Stuartyeates (
talk)
22:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. And should clear up after the weekend. Come back if it gets significantly worse in the meantime.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs from 202.89.x.x range, often changing vocabulary. Warned and blocked multiple times, particularly for altering another editor's comments on the talk page, but the editor simply resets their IP whenever they are blocked. —
Farix (
t |
c)
23:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection. Two new/little-used accounts and two IP addresses are adding to the lead that these mass sexual assaults are carried out by Muslim men, as opposed to men.
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18] (Note: the last diff shows one of them only tweaking what I wrote, but that's because I earlier made the mistake of reverting to one of their versions. I've explained
here.)
SarahSV
(talk)
23:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- More reverts.
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
SarahSV
(talk)
06:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Wgolf (
talk)
23:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ponyo.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is useless, we need to shut down IP edits at this article as they are virtually never constructive. Semi is needed.
Montanabw
(talk)|GO
THUNDER!
00:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected --
Amanda
(aka DQ)
11:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP repeatedly inserting large chunks of original research.
Jeppiz (
talk)
00:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I am entering valid sources. Review the edits yourself. There is original research in the article already. All I am adding is information from valid sources. Just because this person disagrees with it does not make it original research.
173.238.79.44 (
talk)
00:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The IP has posted info which fails verification and which is off-topic.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
01:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The IP also violates
WP:SYNTH by citing a book cover as evidence for verifying information. The IP pretends that he would render all sources included in the book, but imho he renders the point of no particular source whatsoever.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
01:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You bet. Please work out consensus on the talk page, and 173, tone down your rhetoric and recognize that we work on a
WP:CONSENSUS model here. Thanks,
Antandrus
(talk)
02:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk)
00:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes by IP editors to spouse name all day; a few days' semi-protection would be appreciated.
TJRC (
talk)
01:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP has repeatedly made unnecessary edits to the page by inserting and then removing
this edit repeatedly. Another IP address has expressed a problem with this behavior.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
01:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
02:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
02:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized by vulgar and inappropriate content. I don't want to keep people from adding good content but I also want to keep the page appropriate for all ages. All I ask is for the chance to keep the page respectable. Thanks
Bobsanders1991 (
talk)
03:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
03:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, which will hopefully die down when CBB finishes.
Boleyn (
talk)
06:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandal has gone from vandalising my user page (which was protected) to vandalising my talk page. Consistently changing IP addresses. Blocking will not be enough.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
07:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – long history of edit warring and protection on this page. Kindly protect it till discussion ends on talk page.
Human3015
TALK
08:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have calmed down at the moment; please continue talk page conversation rather than revert war.
only (
talk)
13:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event, disruption to good edits by IPs.
Rollingcontributor (
talk)
12:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I only see a few IP edits, and not a lot of them are disruptive. Considering the current event nature of this article, it's relatively calm; if IP vandalism does pick up, re-report it.
only (
talk)
13:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user:denniss is attacking me. Logan Lynn Roberts 12:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I've deleted the page; your page was clearly a promotional/spam profile. Please do not recreate.
only (
talk)
13:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The article has been vandalized by IP users on February 5th, January 28th, January 11th, January 6th, December 23rd, and December 7th. If one counts the incident on January 6th as being within this month, that makes it 4 times in one month. I think that this should be enough.
Display name 99 (
talk)
03:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
12:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough times this article is being vandalized now. Please semi-protect per
WP:BLP indefinitely. —
IB [
Poke ]
12:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Over the past month, a few newer users have been adding a tidal wave of poorly sourced and unsourced content. When they bother to source it, it's often sourced to obviously unreliable sites, like social media and Wordpress blogs. Semiprotection won't stop it all, but it'll make it easier to manage.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
20:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term/persistent vandalism by IP's and non-autoconfirmed users. Also persistent sock puppetry is very likley.
Tryadon (
talk)
01:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The requesting account has been blocked as a sockpuppet.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term/persistent vandalism by IP's and non-autoconfirmed users. Also persistent sock puppetry is very likley.
Tryadon (
talk)
03:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The requesting account has been blocked as a sockpuppet.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last 50 edites - nothing but vandalism (and reverts).
Christian75 (
talk)
09:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The IP has been blocked, insufficient vandalism from other sources to justify protection at this time.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is now spaming his talk page after being blocked.
Krj373*
(talk), *
(contrib)
22:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s) re-
blocked with talk page editing disallowed.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An unverified editor wants to use this like a fan page and is indulging in persistent disruptive editing on this page. Request for temporary protection. --
ANKMALI (
talk)
04:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
only (
talk)
13:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
"List of Converts" articles with galeries
Temporary semi-protection: Due to a current discussion in
WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES containing the verbiage "large populations" several users are seizing the opportunity to remove all galleries, specifically in articles having to do with religion. Since a religion is not an ethnicity, nor is religion mentioned in the discussion, I request Temporary semi-protection to KEEP the galleries until the discussion is settled one way or another.
Trinacrialucente (
talk)
07:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined. First, there is edit-warring which includes autoconfirmed users from both sides, so that full protection would be required. Second, it is a content dispute, it should be properly discussed, and full protection of the articles is an overkill. And the images would be restored/removed depending on the outcome of the discussion anyway. Try to discuss it with the users first.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – permanent vandalism by IPs.
Denniss (
talk)
23:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Frequent vandalism + BLP violations.
MB298 (
talk)
00:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A content dispute is leading to several editors reverting one another at
Wikipedia:Disambiguation. I'd like to see this page fully protected until the talk page discussion regarding the issue is closed. --
Tavix (
talk)
01:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bagumba.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
11:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
More pages PC-protected by inactive admins
Extend pending changes: Very little amount of good IP edits. Reverts have still occurred, especially in the past 30 days. Protecting administrators inactive at the moment.
George Ho (
talk)
09:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: like most internet memes, this seems to attract a lot of vandalism and copyvio uploads.
Jolly
Ω
Janner
04:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection. Couple of IP reverting and not taking it to the talk page.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
05:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism.
Originalchampion (
talk)
02:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: Reverts still occur in the past 30 days.
George Ho (
talk)
09:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Let's see what happens after pending changes expires.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: I don't know how frequently edited the article is, but reverts have occurred, especially in the last 30 days.
George Ho (
talk)
09:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Let's see what happens after pending changes expires.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping Gamergate vandalism.
DuncanHill (
talk)
06:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Disruptive edits.
Music01 (
talk)
20:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
02:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: - but perhaps for a little longer this time. IP vandals can't seem to stay away. -
theWOLFchild
00:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: This page has received dozens of vandalizing edits in the last 2 days, but not a lot before that.
Air.light (
talk)
05:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
21:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-output vandal on page currently.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
22:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
22:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 different IPs and a registered account today.
GAB
Hello!
02:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
02:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by an unregistered editor, on a page about someone who has recently died.
Digifiend (
talk)
06:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Not only vandalism, recent event.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trying every noticeboard I can.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Alexius
Horatius
19:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trying every noticeboard I can.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Alexius
Horatius
20:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation Protection: The page is repeatedly recreated. Please delete and protect it.--
Musa
Talk ☻
19:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done Now at Afd.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
02:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by an ip of this specific page.
Isit2004 (
talk)
19:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Alexius
Horatius
19:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after unprotection, and he's starting in
Super Bowl 50 today, the most watched program in the U.S. of the year. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
19:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and BLP violations.--
♦IanMacM♦
(talk to me)
19:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (93.221.253.114; 84.139.125.10; 84.139.120.115; 93.221.203.172; 84.183.120.126; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:ec76:9c72:7356:4fc8; 179.195.110.45; 93.221.212.164; 93.221.233.138; 93.221.252.112) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article Talk Page.
Jayaguru-Shishya (
talk)
20:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template-protected pages [Edit=Allow only template editors and admins]
Full protection (same time periods): Template protection probably accidental, as it is only appropriate for high-risk templates, modules, and other highly-transcluded pages per
WP:TPROT.
Evad37 [
talk
02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Agreed, but let's ping
Harry and
CorbieVreccan first —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I put List of Power Rangers Dino Supercharge episodes at template protection because it's been plagued with socks, and it's the only thing we have between ten edits/four days (which the sockmaster is gaming with trivial effort) and admins only, but there's no reason somebody trustworthy couldn't edit it if they needed to. You can full protect it if you want, but that would seem to me to be bureaucracy for its own sake.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
18:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Full protection is fine with me. My rationale at the time was the same as for HJ - choosing something between semi and full, for the same reasons. -
CorbieV
☊
☼
19:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- As a template editor, I wouldn't feel comfortable editing a mainspace article that had been template-protected – particularly if from the protection log entry it appears the admin meant to use full protection. Keep in mind also that there are only 122 template editors (less than one-tenth of the number of admins). The only extra potential edits are if one of them finds a template protected article (I only found these through
Special:ProtectedPages), and then decides to edit through protection because they can, even though that wasn't what they were entrusted to do (i.e. not part of
WP:TPE or
WP:TPROT). So while admins can do
WP:IAR protections and template editors can do IAR edits, in my opinion it is so close to full protection that full protection might as well be used. I can see the attractions of something a bit stronger than 10 edits/4 days to stop persistent socks while still allowing a significant number of editors, but I don't think template-protection does a good job of it. -
Evad37 [
talk
01:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Do we actually need any protection for
List of Power Rangers Dino Supercharge episodes? This redirect has not yet been edited disruptively.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done sort of. I increased Betty X to Full protection (same duration) and dropped the power rangers redirect to indef semi. Template protection is not used as an in-between for articles/redirects. If the power rangers redirect needs to be increased to full, fine by me, but I didn't see enough to warrant indef full at this time.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
21:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template-protected pages [Move=Allow only template editors and admins]
Full Move protection (same time periods): Template protection probably accidental, as it is only appropriate for high-risk templates, modules, and other highly-transcluded pages per
WP:TPROT.
Evad37 [
talk
02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
kelapstick(
bainuu)
21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP.
Miszatomic (
talk)
20:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
only (
talk)
20:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Hani and Moorim School OST Vandalism by IPs
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent reverts concerning Hani's contribution to the Soundtrack.
Alicia leo86 (
talk)
10:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done, one semi-protected for a week, for another one I do not see any disruption in the last couple of days.
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. I admire @
Chrisw80 patient effort to address the heavy unsourced vandalism and soapboxing there, so far.
Ms Sarah Welch (
talk)
22:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated unblock requests by banned user.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
23:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have stopped for now
only (
talk)
12:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Page has been previously semi-protected to prevent a persistent anonymous vandal using multiple IPs from inserting original research and edit-warring to protect its original research. Now that the page is no longer semi-protected, the vandal has returned. Longer or indefinite semi-protection is necessary to discourage the vandal, who has demonstrated that it is incapable of discussion, and is resistant to blocking.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
15:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Airplaneman.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
12:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Unsigned edits keep on changing colours (original: "remain" green, "leave" red), but incompletely and inconsistently, making page inconsistent with itself and other wikipedia pages. These colours are used for e.g. the 1975 EC referendum. Last edit chose different colours but made text unreadable. Besides, switching colours would require swapping colours (green always comes before red on Wikipedia), but not done, which denotes vandalism. Verbal abuse from IPs in talk section also denotes vandalism. Requesting semi-protection to stop edits by IPs until solution is found, to keep page as it is and in line with other wikipedia pages. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Pcauchy (
talk •
contribs)
19:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
12:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism over the last two weeks. Page came out of a previous semi-protection on January 22, 2016 and IP vandalism started up almost immediately.
Safiel (
talk)
21:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
12:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
04:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
10:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
09:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Paul Erik
(talk)
(contribs)
11:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP / new user vandalism.
Gsfelipe94 (
talk)
02:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Lankiveil for 12 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and edit wars (one currently ongoing). Band page has been protected before for this reason. –
Nick Mitchell 98
talk
04:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as far as the band article is concerned.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. as far as the TV series is concerned.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent problematic edits from an anonymous user with multiple IPs. Diffs:
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]. At least 5 IPs so far over the last several days, all making the same edit. I'm AGF'ing, but I just can't figure out what this editor is trying to say. The language seems as if they think the subject is a TV show, but it's not...it's a musical group. They're trying to add refs, but they're doing it wrong and the linked refs go nowhere. It seems pretty clear that English isn't their first language, and there may be related
competency issues. The same editor has made similarly problematic edits to
Despicable Me (franchise) and related articles. I'm hoping temporary semi-protection of
Coboy Junior may discourage them from simply re-adding the same text ad nauseum and reach out for assistance (user talk page messages would be futile, as they never edit from the same IP twice). --
IllaZilla (
talk)
06:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
My talk page. I'm under attack. Needs a semi at least after the attacker is blocked.
7&6=thirteen (
☎)
21:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- FYI, If you reply to
User:7&6=thirteen there should not be a problem. Pings and bots sometimes have a problem with my user name.
7&6=thirteen (
☎)
02:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Fixed the issue with the request, just wanted a {{
pagelinks}} template.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, guess I was wrong, I'll just request an archiving.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Explicit.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Amberrock.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP was told many times to stop edit warring the page, but refuses. —
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk)
13:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done Both the requester and the IP have been blocked.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user keeps vandalising the "Recurring cast and characters" section by adding characters who only had single film appearances, when the title clearly reads "recurring".
Kailash29792 (
talk)
17:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The IP is autoconfirmed, so semi will not work, have issued a warning for edit-warring and reverted to pre-war version. Ping me if the war continues.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
SarahSV
(talk)
23:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant unsourced edits regarding a pending sports transaction that has not been confirmed by team.
Cubbie15fan (
talk)
22:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined No attempts have been made to discuss this content matter on article or user talk.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the last few days.
Yeepsi (
talk)
22:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a number of IPs which all geolocate to Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. No attempts are being made at article talk page to discuss these disruptive edits.
GarnetAndBlack (
talk)
20:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done.
GarnetAndBlack, I've taken your word for it that this is vandalism, and I semi-protected for a week. But several IPs were adding that one game was a forfeit. Is that definitely wrong?
SarahSV
(talk)
01:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you. Those several IPs were all geolocated to the same town in Pennsylvania, and IP hopping of this nature is generally frowned upon. As for the content, neither school recognizes the game in question as anything other than what it was, a USC victory, and this can be verified in the annual football media guides published by the two schools. The forfeit was imposed by the ACC (not the NCAA) solely for purposes of awarding a conference championship.
GarnetAndBlack (
talk)
02:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal operating several IPs, changing from one IP to another as each IP is blocked. Continually rewords information to be error, masked by deceptive edit summaries.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
22:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. by another admin.
only (
talk)
02:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term protection is needed for persistent vandalism. Whack-a-mole blocks haven't stopped the issue, nor has short term (24 hours to a week) of protection.
Neutralhomer •
Talk •
20:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 20:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done I can only see one previous protection, so perhaps some logs are missing, but it's clear that someone keeps arriving with the same vandalism, so I've added indefinite semi-protection.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal operating several IPs, changing from one IP to another as each IP is blocked. Labors under the inane assumption that "pickup truck" is somehow emotive and vulgar.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
22:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. by another admin.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection for 1 month. We have an aggressive IP editor who is edit warring based on harsh interpretations of policy (removing every bit of everything not fully cited over the objections of several editors who are trying to improve the article.) this is quite the opposite of the usual vandal, but it is as disruptive. Please semi. Thanks.
Jytdog (
talk)
06:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The page should actually be protected from edit-warring registered users, including the requester here, who insist on keeping unsourced material in the article after it has been removed and after having been "citation needed" tagged for a reasonable amount of time. Ignoring the Wikipedia sourcing pillar is not acceptable. And saying that several editors "are trying to improve the article" is a complete fabrication. They have done nothing to source the unsourced material - they simply restore it, saying that the burden is on me to either source it myself or leave it untouched.
70.124.133.228 (
talk)
06:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- agree w/
Jytdog, semi-protection would be a very good idea for 1 month--
Ozzie10aaaa (
talk)
13:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: User warned for now.
SarahSV
(talk)
23:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done for the bot.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- A different IP is making some of the same edits, so semi-protected for one month.
SarahSV
(talk)
04:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Leicester just defeated Man City in Manchester so a lot of vandalism from Leicester fans.
Qed237
(talk)
14:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
15:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: There's been persistent additions of fake and unverified charts by IPs and new users here too, as well as random chart number changes not found in the sources.. It has been a problem for months, and the first page of 50 edits consists almost solely of such edits and subsequent reverts to them.
Kokoro20 (
talk)
13:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of artists with no article. Notes to talk pages have failed as the IP addresses keep changing, and a note on the article talk page has been ignored.
Whpq (
talk)
14:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, per
WP:WTAF, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism since January 30, targeting a living person currently in the news as part of coordinated online harassment campaign, connected to doxing, and other ongoing activities across several sites.
142.166.156.85 (
talk)
20:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Autoconfirmed user repeatedly readding content in defiance of a commented out warning added by an admin. Diff to when the warning was added:
[29]. For the repeated readditions of content: see the recent history of the article, the (maybe confused?) user readding the content is Darek555.
112.195.153.6 (
talk)
00:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It keeps happening. Can we have the page protected already?
112.195.153.6 (
talk)
17:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, you should be blocked as you edit anonymously only from IP and you permanently deleting my section , you have no right with this what you are doing, on discussion users confirm that Path of Exile have permadeath mode. Please restore my section and protect.--
Darek555 (
talk)
21:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discuss it on the talk page, please.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is not sufficient here. This is my third protection request dealing with the same matter. Some IP hopper keeps making the same disruptive changes over and over again. This has happened for months, yet nothing has been done about it. The last protection request resulted in PC, but that doesn't stop the IP. Please semi this page.
RGloucester —
☎
19:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
22:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Page was previously semi-protected against IPs making unconstructive, original research fancruft edits. Now that page-protection has worn off, same IPs/same users have returned to reinsert exact same fancruft edits back into the article.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
19:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article was re-created as per deletion of A7 criteria. Moreover the variation was also made
here. So no option but to be
salted off. . SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
09:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Page is currently being besieged by different persistent IP vandals.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
15:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
19:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent increase in persistent non-constructive editing
.
Onel5969
TT me
18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
18:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a range of IPs.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1o days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption of adding false sales and certifications. —
IB [
Poke ]
19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism trying to link to Cory in the House.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
20:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: or IPv6 2605:e000:2340:400/64 range block. Range has repeatedly changed Uzbek to Soviet. Previously rangeblocked for 24-hours, but now back a week later. See
Talk:Milana Vayntrub#Soviet/Uzbek.
Glrx (
talk)
20:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after a recent controversial social media comment.
Lizard (
talk)
21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk)
21:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Need Admin edit (not move) protection level reduced to Template Editor, to add features from sibling template {{
Notice}}. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
15:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
BethNaught (
talk)
21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection: This article has been a morass of IP disturbance for a couple of years. Mainly by the subject's mother (who originally created the article and also even created a wiki article on herself,
Margaret Palermo, through her registered account before that account was temporarily blocked and she started using IPs instead) and other COI editors, but also just random IP vandalism. Dealing with it is more than one or two editors can handle, and frankly we should not put up with it anymore.
Softlavender (
talk)
11:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced claims by IPs and some promotion only accounts.
Charles Turing (
talk)
13:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
DMacks (
talk)
20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal keeps blanking page under different IPs.
Ches
(talk)
20:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--31h on the /24.
DMacks (
talk)
20:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- And then
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. y
User:Yamaguchi先生. No objection from me to this longer-term target-specific action for a looooong-term vandal magnet.
DMacks (
talk)
21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The user created this after
Tanvir Hossain was protected after he had created the article there four times, as well as at his own user page once.
—Largo Plazo (
talk)
20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive edits.
Qed237
(talk)
10:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The problem with this article is that a large number of edits are by
autoconfirmed users, so semi-protection wouldn't achieve much. If anyone violates
WP:3RR or edit wars generally, consider taking them to
WP:AN3 instead.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: If the IP addresses to try to mess around with User pages that they can not enter. To edit certify members and administrators. I have only myself to protection. Take out insurance. Because, some IP adresse wrote to my page in Lithuanian Wikipedia, and I had problems.
Wikipedia great! - Lukaslt13
My talk - Yes? - Yes
10:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13
reply
- Anybody hear me? Hello?--
Wikipedia great! - Lukaslt13
My talk - Yes? - Yes
11:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13
reply
Not done There were no edits from IP's to your userpage here in the English Wikipedia; we do not protect preemptively. We can not protect your userpage in the Lithuanian Wikipedia. Please relist when your userpage gets vandalized.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a series of IPs. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
14:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done by administrator
Mattythewhite.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Banned IP user wont get the hint.
Only in death does duty end (
talk)
15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. I have blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Colton Cosmic just switches IP's continuously, so its needs semi-protection sadly. Its a cycle with him, page gets semi'd, he goes quiet for awhile, comes back when its open again.
Only in death does duty end (
talk)
15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done by administrator
John Reaves.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and long term attempts to use the article as a means of promoting real estate values in the area.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the most recent spammer.
Katie
talk
18:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
KungAvSand (
talk)
16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism, multiple accounts.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done by administrator
Mike Rosoft.
Katie
talk
18:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As per what the vandal said, he has a dynamic IP.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: No history of page vandalism since the page was just made, but it is bound to be vandalized.
Musicpoplover12 (
talk)
08:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Melonkelon (
talk)
11:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection due to persistent IP vandalism.
Beach drifter (
talk)
17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
GB
fan
18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive IP-edits despite multiple warnings
.
CFCF
💌
📧
00:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Question:
CFCF, there was a similar problem yesterday with that IP, but the disruption was a little clearer then. In this case, can you explain why it isn't simply a content dispute?
SarahSV
(talk)
03:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Primarily because the IP is not engaging in discussion, or acknowledging that opinions other than his own may impact the content of the article. This is a continuation of the exact same behavior he was warned and asked not to engage in.
CFCF
💌
📧
07:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- He seems to have begun engaging in constructive editing since my request, and as such I would put this request on hold.
CFCF
💌
📧
07:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot)
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The pending changes isn't enough to prevent reverts on the same content.
George Ho (
talk)
08:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobio of non-notable and disruptive
WP:SPA.
NeemNarduni2 (
talk)
11:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Musa
Talk ☻
00:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. There are other IPs that are making positive contributions, so I am loath to semi-protect. I have warned the disruptive IP. If blanking re-occurs, please ping me.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent removal of AfD template by multiple accounts. According to the discussion at AfD, this is one of multiple promotional incarnations, and has engendered an SPI as well. Ideally, deletion with salt is recommended.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
17:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: Page already deleted by
Drmies.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected by Drmies (for the bot)
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking (see page history).
Thomas.W
talk
08:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Protection request declined recently. Please reconsider.
Jetstreamer
Talk
14:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
07:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism keeps occurring almost every day, usually from unregistered users.
Cal-isco15 (
talk)
06:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
07:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – False death reports, likely a 4chan prank.
FallingGravity (
talk)
07:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
07:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection until 02/16/2016: Persistent vandalism for last days/weeks/months. --
Obsuser (
talk)
04:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost every day is vandalized, sometimes even multiple times a day.
In veritas (
talk)
05:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See how that goes. Feel free to ping me if it comes back after two weeks.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Peacemaker67 Thank you!
In veritas (
talk)
06:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targetted alot with several vandalistic IP edits. Refer these diffs please
[30],
[31],
[32],
[33],
[34] and
[35]. Removing adequate "sourced content" plus keeping own views for his religion. . SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
06:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
MYS
77
✉
03:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This appears to be a Kosovo-related issue. No attempts have been made to discuss on article or user talk pages.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing
high-traffic cricket tournament. Surprisingly vandalism-free until now (IPs have been more helpful than hindersome), but vandalism has escalated now the tournament is in its final stages, and is getting more difficult to detect with the increased number of edits to the page.
IgnorantArmies
(talk)
07:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There appear to be positive contributions being made by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users, so I'm loath to semi-protect at this time.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full-protection: Edit warring.
77.37.134.66 (
talk)
18:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The edit-warring user has been blocked. If they return, ping me.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
01:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Genre warring.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
19:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Disrupting IP has been {{
blocked}} by
KrakatoaKatie.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
01:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Given the block, not necessary at this time. If they return, ping me.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Musa
Talk ☻
00:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP and new user vandalism, due to the Super Bowl game (this person is a player in that game.) –
Gladamas
talk
02:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. –
Gladamas
talk
02:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Drmies.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to Lynch's intention to retire. As of now, there has been no official announcement.
TheTMOBGaming2 (
talk)
03:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully things will have settled down by then.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP / new user vandalism.
Djadjko (
talk)
01:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This is a redirect that is five days into a Redirects for Discussion debate, which looks almost 100% certain to end in deletion. IP's are repeatedly removing the RfD tag and/or converting to article content while RfD debate is underway. Since we are 5 days into the RfD, request 3 days semi protection to cover the remaining balance of the RfD discussion.
Safiel (
talk)
03:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection until 02/16/2016: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IPs either making inappropriate changes to dates, or incessantly adding inconsequential fancruft minutia.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
03:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP editors trying to repeat the same inferior edit that has been rejected on the talkpage already a long time ago.
Debresser (
talk)
13:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully, this will get the IPs engaging on talk.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Ongoing vandalism
Deku-shrub (
talk)
14:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
14:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One of the IPs is autoconfirmed, but this will help. Take the IP with three warnings to AIV if it continues.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This has been going on since just before the beginning of 2016 with this article, with various IPv6 users 2600:1006:b1* as well as users Billyjamesd, Grohlhole and Frankupapa (who are indefinitely blocked as sockpuppets of another blocked user ... see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002/Archive) all altering info about who was #1 on the Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart. The common denominator with all these users is their replacing whoever is listed with a Green Day song, going against what is said in the references given. I've been following this across at least a couple of Billboard-related articles ...
List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2005 and
List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of 2005 in particular ... as well as seeing all sorts of vandalism on Green Day related articles for a few weeks ("
When I Come Around" and "
Wake Me Up When September Ends" for example), and it's getting frustrating to say the least about needing to revert these falsities put in these articles, either by myself or other editors watching them.
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
15:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
16:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from many new accounts.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
16:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Bbb23.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an IP is being particularly persistent.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
11:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A persistent vandal has been adding fake cast lists to this article. Examples:
[36],
[37],
[38], and
[39]. These all fail verification, as none of the cast members added in the edits appear in the citation. This has been going on for over a month.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
12:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
03:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war between several users.
Dcheagle •
talk •
contribs
21:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And due to the absolutely egregious violations of 3RR:
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
22:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address vandalize the template my changing the map. It should be permanently semi-protected, ip have nothing to do in location template subpages.
Ąnαșταη (
ταlκ)
16:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined This looks like a part of the Kosovo independence dispute. No attempt to communicate with IPs has been made, insufficient disruption to justify protection at this time.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous vandal is repeatedly vandalizing Giraffidae, and changes to a new IP in order to evade each successive block.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
22:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi protection: Multiple IPs and accounts attacking this article today.
Meters (
talk)
23:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs.
« Ryūkotsusei » 20:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs.
« Ryūkotsusei » 20:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs.
Iñaki LL (
talk)
20:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit-warring over map to be used. Needs a consensus on talk, RfC it if you need to.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent (every 1-2 days) vandalism from a number of IPs, so pending changes seems the best option to prevent this.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See how that goes, happy to extend if the IPs aren't put off.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection (including the move protection). The move protection is the issue (same with the three above). I'm cleaning up stray ungrammatical hyphenation in a few remaining templates in this class, and have run into a handful that can't be moved without admin bits. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
23:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Although this doesn't seem to me to be a move that should be done unilaterally. Is there discussion regarding the move?
kelapstick(
bainuu)
01:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Every time I RM them, they get moved. Every time I list them at RM for speedy moving they get moved. Every time I move them manually, they stay moved. I took this slow for months and months, and there is no push-back. I just moved a bazillion of them, and no one cared. The reasons to move them are that the hyphenation is nonsensical in English (looks like an idea imported from French Wikipedia, since that language uses hyphenation a lot, and French speakers using English do it frequently, like referring to
pool as "pool-billiard", a construction that is silly in English); it was very randomly and very spottily applied resulting in most templates (naturally) not having this "randomly hyphenate-some words-but not others-like that" mess; and thus people never being able to remember which were and were not hyphenated, resulting in more and more and more pointless redirects being made all the time so that attempts at guessing which spelling will work will all work. If we just get rid of the pointless hyphenation, people will mostly stop making hyphenated versions. Several years ago there was general move across
WP:TFD to move as many template names as feasible to plain-English constructions and away from confusing gobbledegook, at least if they're expected to be used by human editors directly. This is just overdue cleanup in furtherance of that goal. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
02:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From x protection to template editor protection (including the move protection). Do I need to keep listing these individually, or should I just bunch them up? [I've tried bunching them up this time.] —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
02:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Noted your response above above, thanks for the info. Bunching up is fine. Saves multiple responses on the admin end.--
kelapstick(
bainuu)
02:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
kelapstick(
bainuu)
02:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Two editors are edit warring to insert a disputed passage and refusing to respond on the talk page. Please restore the long-standing version of the passage (05:31, 5 February 2016) and temporarily lock the page to enable proper
WP:DR.
Eperoton (
talk)
01:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please contact the other editors and urge them to discuss on the article talk page.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: - Short term protection against IP editor making mass changes without sources or edit summaries, edit warring and refusal to discuss on talk page after request to do so. Thanks -
theWOLFchild
17:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
21:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
JohnMcButts (
talk)
18:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism / trolling by now-blocked
User:Ezzabell, 2 new accounts and IP afterwards.
GermanJoe (
talk)
12:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
22:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
aqwfyj
Talk/
Contribs
14:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: There are two issues going on with this article. First, there was some vandalism from IP editors this morning, but it seems to have subsided. Second, there is a content dispute—to which
aqwfyj is a party—about Wilson's ethnicity. There is an open RFC about it at the article's talk page. The article was fully protected on 1 Feb because of this dispute. (@
Doug Weller: Pinging you so you're aware of this discussion.) I blocked one participant of the content dispute (
Nezi1111 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)) on 5 February; aqwfyj only barely escaped a block for edit warring based on his agreement to stop reverting the article for the next 24 hours.I present all this to provide some history about the article. I'm close enough to the situation that I don't want to act directly here. I would recommend declining this request as written for lack of persistent vandalism. I also don't think the article needs fully protected again. However, fresh eyes would help the situation. —
C.Fred (
talk)
15:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Just to add to this, I made the request again due to additional IP editor vandalism that has occurred since the last request was denied. For a page as visible as this, without semi-protection, IP editor vandalism is fairly consistent from my observation.
aqwfyj
Talk/
Contribs
16:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done I protected it due to an edit war. Looking back over the last couple of months, semi-protection would have had little to no effect on the article. Today seems to have been an exception and I see 28 watchers who have visited recent edits, suggesting that normal vandalism can be controlled.
Doug Weller
talk
19:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done This was template protected in 2013, it's only fully move protected.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Increased from semiprotection to template protection.
kelapstick(
bainuu)
23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done This was template protected in 2013, it's only fully move protected.23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
kelapstick(
bainuu)
Full-protection: Edit warring / content dispute.
122.155.3.22 (
talk)
17:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Both users have already been warned for edit-warring.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
12:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
12:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
103.6.159.77 (
talk)
18:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection (eg. 3–7 days). Current event with high death toll and the first IP has turned up.
[40]. —
Sladen (
talk)
14:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - most of the anon edits I checked were good, but this will probably change after a day or two. Re-list if situation worsens.
Alexius
Horatius
17:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an anonymous, IP-hopping vandal with a long history of inserting poorly written, unsourced original research identification, and vociferous edit-warring to protect said original research edits. Edit summaries of "you promise never to undo it again" clearly identifies it as the exact same vandal who attacks
Pete (Disney) whenever that page is not semi-protected.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - last month averages an incident every week or two - probably better for now to simply revert them.
Alexius
Horatius
17:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk)
19:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal.
Deli nk (
talk)
20:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor attacking the article today.
Deli nk (
talk)
19:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism of high passing interest fun subject.
fredgandt
19:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: My page was recently vandalized by an IP address that was blocked by Cyphoidbomb. I want my page semi'd to prevent any further incidents like this.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done.
Alexius
Horatius
20:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by several anonymous editors over the past few hours.
Entranced98 (
talk)
19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal keeps adding picture of another person to the infobox.
Peter James (
talk)
19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
This page continues to be updated with non-cited information. Updates are reverted as this page has been "taken over" by unknown user who continues to change the page with outdated information. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bmedick (
talk •
contribs)
20:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, I do not see any disruption--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of recent IP disruptions by changing sales and adding
WP:OR. —
IB [
Poke ]
16:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online 18:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC
Semi-protected indefinitely. by Drmies.
tutterMouse (
talk)
20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Must be a defend-a-racist day. Vandalism all day long after a week of no edits at all.
No longer a penguin (
talk)
17:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for 3 days by Drmies.
tutterMouse (
talk)
20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
16:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of Hoaxes by
User:Bertrand101 IP Sockpuppet.
121.1.31.102 (
talk)
00:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
16:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dewritech (
talk)
10:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
10:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Man, what happened? This must have been posted on 4Chan or reddit.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Truewiki2016 was blocked for a week for edit-warring; now there's a "new" editor (Swecheng) who has picked up where Truewiki2016 left off. It's obvious that they intend to persist; can we please have semi-protection for a couple of weeks. .
Nomoskedasticity (
talk)
12:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. three months by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
16:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additional protection, please. Valid edits outnumbered by vandalism.
Hertz1888 (
talk)
15:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
16:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs at 82.110.109.*
Vipinhari ||
talk
16:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
16:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
121.1.31.102 (
talk)
00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
10:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – requesting a week long gold lock. slow burning editwar where an IP hopper and multiple editors are in dispute. Please protect before someone gets themselves blocked. .
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
05:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - last protection was a couple weeks ago and only one anon since then (a few days ago) - not really disruptive enough for full protection. If the anon is just going to make a couple edits once a week or so, reverting it is probably a better option than protecting an article from any editing.
Alexius
Horatius
10:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: - Vandalism.--
BabbaQ (
talk)
09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
10:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Mezigue (
talk)
13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and non auto confirmed accounts.
172.56.39.222 (
talk)
01:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection. This article is being discussed on Facebook and Reddit. Several IPs and SPAs have arrived since 1 February to add to the first sentence that these mass sexual assaults are distinctive to Arabs or Muslims. After 18 reverts,
Lectonar added three days semi-protection on 5 February, and it has now started up again.
SarahSV
(talk)
03:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: High level of edit-warring of large chunks of content. A page protection would encourage users to use the talk page.
Étienne Dolet (
talk)
09:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)
[1]
03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. one week by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
04:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection. Disruptive IP hoppers. Steadily adding that the
sexual fetish/
paraphilia named object sexuality is a
sexual orientation, with no attempt at discussion other than
this small section at my talk page, which makes it clear that object sexuality is a sexual fetish/paraphilia. Some reverts of the disruption have also made this clear with edit summaries.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk)
03:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
05:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
06:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: There have been reverts while the protecting administrator is inactive at the moment.
George Ho (
talk)
07:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: To prevent mixups in anything throughout said articles... —
2601:183:4000:D5BD:49:8EB:C5A6:9A3B (
talk)
17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Philip J Fry /
talk
22:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Semi-protection won't help in this case, and full protection not warranted at this time. Gave user a final warning (and a
welcome).
Mini
apolis
00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Would like semi-protection for six months.
Musicpoplover12 (
talk)
23:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism.
Aleph Kaph (
talk)
23:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
KungAvSand (
talk)
03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
04:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Persistent IP vandalism.
7&6=thirteen (
☎)
03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
04:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
BethNaught (
talk)
23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
23:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
(Non admin) Endorsing this request. The subject has flared up emotion and we see it in the edit history.--
Mr. Guye (
talk)
02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
PM800 (
talk)
00:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Frankie
talk
16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I see differing opinions; mostly autoconfirmed editors, so semiprotection wouldn't do anything to prevent it.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor edit warring to add trivia.
Scr★pIron
IV
16:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content for a future film by several IPs. No responses to talk requests/talk page.
. SummerPhD
v2.0
19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Very slow and only one instance today...please relist if it picks up.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses keep removing spoilers. The series is pretty popular and just started, so that's to be expected.
DragonZero (
Talk ·
Contribs)
08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: A frequently updated article about a controversial topic, with a growing history of unproductive and/or poorly informed edits.
3hunna (
talk)
10:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Not really much vandalism, actually much less than I would expect.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Strange edit war. —
Jeraphine Gryphon (
talk)
14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Recent high level of vandalism.
Hohenloh
+
21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. The page was previously protected for 2 years which expired on 26 January 2016. The vandalism returned after.
AD (
talk)
22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
22:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
23:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
23:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
More move-protected but minor templates
Need Admin protection move (and if applicable) edit protection reduced to Template Editor (but there is no need to raise edit protection above Autoconfirmed). Same as the batches already processed earlier. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
04:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
23:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of traffic stats against consensus by IP socks of
User talk:Vigneshr1711. —
LeoFrank
Talk
16:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP vandals that were vandalizing
Rugby Challenge 3 earlier today to cause page to be protected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
22:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of BLP IP vandalism.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
22:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
22:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The only new accounts or IPs to edit this article are vandals or the promoters of "magic unicorn horses." Waste of editor resources to be babysitting this article.
Montanabw
(talk)
23:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., to be honest, the level of vandalism is moderate, last time it was semi-protected was 2007, I do not see any reason why it should be indef-protected now. If vandalism resumes after two weeks we can re-protect it or configure pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another horse breed article plagued by IP and new accounts either vandalizing or promoting "magic unicorn horses" Featured Article, too. Editors have other things to do than vandal patrol on this one, please.
Montanabw
(talk)
23:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Lectonar..
Ged
UK
12:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs, maybe around 4 of them, are adding unsourced scores.
Callmemirela 🍁
{Talk}
♑
03:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ged
UK
12:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous blanking of page, and addition of unrelated content by multiple IPs.
ilovechristianmusic
(Tell Me Something!)
03:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
08:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
04:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., vandalism is infrequent, let us try pending changes.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism.
2605:6000:8B43:5B00:6C53:D634:9559:60C2 (
talk)
04:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, not high level.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
clpo13(
talk)
09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
clpo13(
talk)
09:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Future Perfect at Sunrise.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – bog-standard vandalism from IP .
Nomoskedasticity (
talk)
09:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Ctwabn (
talk)
10:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
clpo13(
talk)
10:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done by administrator
Callanecc.. Filer warned not to edit-war on good faith edits and call them "vandalism".
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unnecessary links. -
Niceguyedc
Go Huskies!
11:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
11:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I checked the few edits made over the last week and I can see explanations for all of them.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. -
Anjana Larka
SEND WIKILOVE💗
11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ged
UK
12:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
112.198.98.37 (
talk)
12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
112.198.98.37 (
talk)
12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For over a month an IP has been changing this to call the group Nazi instead of neo-Nazi, and adding that its ideology includes anti-Western sentiment despite the lack of any source. I'm a bit dubious about the IP's other edits but don't have the time or knowledge to check them.
Doug Weller
talk
13:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, adding to watchlist and will re-protect if they start up after that.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from several IPs over the past few hours.
Entranced98 (
talk)
15:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. three days by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
18:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
16:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: To prevent tampering from anonymous users. —
cyberpower
Be my Valentine:Limited Access
16:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indef.
Alexius
Horatius
18:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary -protection:- Vandalism.--
BabbaQ (
talk)
16:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
17:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —
Jeraphine Gryphon (
talk)
17:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a series of related IPs.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
18:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
18:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: The channel received significant coverages. Requesting an un-salt for the page. . SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: Have a look on these coverages
[42],
[43],
[44] and
[45] on several Catholic news portals. SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
09:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Please contact
User:Master of Puppets, the admin who deleted and salted the last version (if you have not done so already).
Lectonar (
talk)
10:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Also, the chances of unprotecting are greater if there's a draft article ready to move into place. There might be some sourcing but it still needs to stand as an article.
tutterMouse (
talk)
12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I know because the article passes the
guideline criteria (an article must have received "significant coverage" in reliable sources that are independent of the subject). Probably, i had contacted the salting admin for this matter. SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I have several reservations about this that I've detailed
on my talk page.
m.o.p
17:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Technically this is being discussed elsewhere so I feel it's
Not done, any admin can override this of course.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Edit semi-protected: The header states that he "earned...support among working-class voters, as well as widespread opposition from Hispanics/Latinos, Muslims, business leaders, and other Republicans," but does not cite a source. This is not the language used later on in the article where it says "...earned him support among working-class voters and voters without college educations amid heavy and frequent controversies in the news media." I think it's unfair to paint him in this way without at least citing a source because potential voters of those groups may read the header and get an impression of him without actually looking into his positions for themselves. My request or suggestion is to change the language in the header to what is said later in the article (which is cited), or cite a source for the original claims.
WikiUser2244 (
talk)
01:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done No specific edit proposed. The article talk page is the appropriate venue for discussion of content.
Katie
talk
03:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
My specific edit was to change the last line of the header to what it is says later in the article. I said "My request or suggestion is to change the language in the header to what is said later in the article (which is cited), or cite a source for the original claims." If you can't find a source or if that's not how this process works then my "proposal" is to just change the wording to match. Also, the talk page is also semi-protected, otherwise I wouldn't have posted here.
WikiUser2244 (
talk)
04:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- You'd be right, that isn't how the process works. You need to bring what specific changes you want to have made, admins are only proxies for these small edits after all so they can't do anything that requires more than a copypaste or that forwards a specific POV. If you have a different wording for the unsourced sentence in the lede then that probably could be done seeing as it's an unsourced statement, just need to say where it is and what it should read as with cites if you have them.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Okay, so I'd like to change the last sentence of the header to read "Trump's politically incorrect, anti-illegal immigration politics, which also concentrated on terrorism and national security concerns, earned him support among working-class voters and voters without college educations amid heavy and frequent controversies in the news media," for the reasons stated originally. The source that cites this is source 200.
WikiUser2244 (
talk)
14:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
131.128.73.5 (
talk)
reply
- Restoring as the request wasn't actually done, I would do it but it's a hot button article I'd rather not be involved with.
tutterMouse (
talk)
11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- In short, I agree with the first responding admin that this is a talk page matter. In detail: It should be "anti-illegal-immigration policies"; that's a three-word compound adjective. Needs comma before "amid" (the voters' educations are not what's amid the controversies). Other than that, this seems reasonable wording as far as it goes, but not as a blanket replacement. My concern would be that there are likely other sources in the the article for "widespread opposition from" various demographics. It's not that the lead is making a unitary unsourced claim; rather it is doing what a lead is supposed to do, summarizing various material in the article that is sourced lower down. It's a general principle that stuff in the lead does need to be sourced there but only if it's likely to be controversial or challenged. Anything at all like this is controversial and likely to be challenged, so the lead simply needs the sources for those claims added to it, even if WikiUser2244's particular wording tweak is also used as a substitute for part of it. The only danger would be
WP:OR, in the form of synthesis that "leads" the reader, e.g. if it said something like "because of his position on national security concerns, he earned the enmity of Hispanic voters", an implication our sources don't make and that we should not draw (they suggest that it was because of his anti-illegal-immigration perspective, which while it relates strongly to national security concern, in Trump's views, to Muslim immigration, it does not to Hispanic immigration). —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Four days is a long time, don't think
WikiUser2244 is returning but I'll ping them anyway to see if they have any more input.
tutterMouse (
talk)
12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Calling time on this, doesn't seem like anyone is willing to change the lede (not to mention it's actually transcluded from a different article) so this one's just procedurally not done as per KrakatoaKatie.
tutterMouse (
talk)
11:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Katie
talk
14:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Temporary Full-protection: despite the locking up of the page last week for 3 days...we still have a problem...not sure why they are not working on the wording on the talk page instead of in edit summaries. We simply have no need to see 10 changes to a page because some are not sure how to word things....work it out - then edit.--
Moxy (
talk)
17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
{{
RFPP|p|5 days}}
Lectonar (
talk)
21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Lectonar, your edit summary in protecting
[46], "Use the talk page please...communicating only by edit summaries a little unkind", shows you have no idea what's going on. Unkind? What are you talking about??? Recent edit summaries
[47] -- "good point... I'm sure you're right, but still I think this wording is better... how about this?" -- obviously reflect completely collegial, friendly, constructive editing, in the last twelve hours focused on trying to get one little phrase clear. Christ, we've even been thanking each other for these edits! There's no dispute at all. Get your finger off the hair-trigger, put you pistol back in its holster, and if you don't have time to find out what's going on, then move on and let someone else handle it. You obviously aren't giving due attention when you protect 5 pages in six minutes
[48].
- The baseless complaint of one editor...whose meandering thoughts are tied together with dots...who hasn't participated in the editing...and shows no interest in doing so...and whose objection...is simply that he doesn't want to "see 10 changes to a page because some are not sure how to word things"...is not a reason to protect.
-
David Eppstein,
BushelCandle, please comment.
E
Eng
22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: It can be quite disconcerting for some inexperienced editors when there are many edits to a page in a short period of time. They may feel overwhelmed and not able to spend the time to examine each individual small and incremental edit. However, these feelings of inadequacy may be salved by the comforting thought that other, more competent editors are keeping an eye on things and it is not necessary for them to act as page guardians. However, Moxy is hardly inexperienced. He should have realised by now that he does not necessarily have to examine individually a series of 10 successive edits. If he hasn't drastically changed his user interface, in the edit history he should be able to just click on the radio buttons for the first and last edits of a particular series and see the global effect summarised. The advantage in editing in small increments is that it is relatively easy for any editor (including Moxy) to revert a particular edit that he's not happy with.
- IMO, EEng has been punctilious in using the discussion page to discuss with other editors any historic or proposed edits that have either not achieved consensus (by being reverted) or he suspects may require a consensus in advance.
- Where detailed editing of the MoS is concerned, it is grossly inefficient to discuss the placement of every semi-colon in advance. This idea that there can be too many edits to a page' (when each of those edits build collegiately on the edits of others) does seem totally against the spirit and ethos of a Wiki. Are we to give up the idea that a group of editors may together co-operatively construct a better page? Who is Moxy proposing as custodian of this particular page? After the page is unlocked, what would he think is a reasonable rate of improvement? One edit per minute, hour, day or week? Genuine question because I really don't think there is any precedent for this strange complaint...
- I'm also rather concerned that, despite hinting in his complaint above of the need for prior discussions about needed edits to occur on the protected article's discussion page, he did not canvass opinion there for his perceived need to fully protect the page again. How do we protect against this sort of individualistic behavior ? By requesting a topic ban for him ?
-
This log confirms the truth of EEng's statement above that, with the
odd exception, editing has recently been cordial and collegiate on the protected page.
-
BushelCandle (
talk)
23:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I have disengaged from the talk page of this MOS page because of the battleground attitude of some participants: every little point, no matter how seemingly uncontroversial it should be, gets attacked and discussed to death. This is a case in point. There are two major sets of RFCs open (one on how strongly we should discourage image scaling, another on image galleries in certain articles) but the edits to the MOS have largely avoided those issues and focused on small improvements to clarity and grammar. Despite this, even that type of change is too much for some of the editors on the talk page, who want everything locked down, everything reverted to the status quo ante, and every change battled in countless nested discussions and RFCs until it dies from exhaustion rather than ever actually being enacted. This RFPP seems to fit that pattern very clearly, and I am disappointed that Lectonar has fallen in with this request, without more carefully examining whether any of the recent changes were actually the controversial ones that are still under discussion. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
23:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- What I saw was disagreement and a died down discussion on the talk-page; what I did not see was consensus. Imho in this case it is not the for the protecting admin to make a decision as to the worth of the arguments, because that would make him involved. If another admin wants to unprotect, go right ahead.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Softlavender, can you please do the honors, since Lectonar has the ridiculous idea that he can't undo his own obviously mistaken action?
-
Lectonar, you don't need to evaluate "the worth of the arguments" (what arguments?) because what's going on on the talk page has no bearing on page protection; what matters is whether the actual editing that's going on is collegial and appropriate; as seen above, if you'd just read the edit summaries you would have seen that it was, and that it has nothing to do with the various discussions/disputes on the talk page. Your contributions history
[49] shows that you do almost no actual article editing; given that, maybe you're not the best admin to be evaluating what is and is not appropriate editing behavior. And also as previously noted, protecting five pages in six minutes is not an appropriate rate at which to make such decisions, so if you don't have time to give due consideration, please leave the job to others.
E
Eng
12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected - although I do agree with Moxy in that it'd be better discuss on the talk page rather than through edit summaries.
Alexius
Horatius
17:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- While I appreciate your doing what Lectonar should have done himself, I'm sure I speak for all others who actually edit the page in expressing bafflement at your comment. For example, you've made 823 edits to South Dakota
[50], yet only 37 (yes, thirty-seven!) posts to that article's talk page
[51]. Why aren't you gaining consensus for those edits in advance? Why are you communicating via edit summaries such as trim; these would be okay at list of people from sd, but for Olympians I think actually winning a medal sounds like a reasonable cut-off and custer sp pic wasn't bad but didn't show anything new; had been 5 pics, all West River. Revomed Custer and some of the forced image sizes and staggered placement of remaining photos. Shouldn't you have discussed those things on the talk page? Do you not agree the article should be protected to force you to do so, even though none of your recent edits is disputed?
E
Eng
18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subjected to persistent IP user vandalism.
TheWarOfArt (
talk)
22:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
00:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – since January 17.
SMP0328. (
talk)
22:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
00:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incoming IP, new account attacks. .
Dr.
K.
01:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism—it's apparently the in thing for IPs to add themselves as Dylan's wife or girlfriend. This has been happening with increasing frequency since September. –
Robin Hood
(talk)
02:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
03:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
02:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
HighInBC
02:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits are nonsensical.
JC ·
Talk ·
Contributions
18:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
20:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a target of animal-rights activists who add unsourced non-neutral opinions, disrupting the neutrality of it. Recommend long-term temporary (a month) semi-protection.
McDoob
AU93
23:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't get why but people keep changing this guy into a "daddy" even after many anti-vandals fought to change them back. Thank you.
Ueutyi (
talk)
00:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –Obvious misinformation presented and being added repeatedly.
Ueutyi (
talk)
00:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors are engaged in a revert war.
Boomer Vial
Holla
00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the start of January this year, its edit history has been almost entirely vandalism.
Stickee
(talk)
22:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
23:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:, Multiple vandalism issues by unregistered and registered users.
TheBellaTwins1445(
talk) 3:40, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
23:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Redirects to update
Reduction to Template Editor protection needed, to fix redirs to point to
Template:Cite magazine, not
Template:Cite journal. Or an admin can just fix them if they need to retain full-protection for cascading reasons. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
16:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Question: I can't modify the cascading protection for individual specific pages without waiting. Can you give me more information on the proposed redirection (eg why is it uncontroversial, will it affect the current uses)?
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
23:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism.
Donnowin1 (
talk)
02:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism/unsourced additions have been resuming as soon as the recent protections expired.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
High level of long term vandalism from IP users; keeps blanking page and redirecting to other articles.
128.61.26.55 (
talk)
05:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined No disruption since last request was declined —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 adding likely false, but definitely unreferenced info to article. Refuses to discuss issue and is edit warring this.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
05:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know this is on the main page, but there has been a good amount of vandalism.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
14:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined I personally don't protect the TFA barring the most extreme of disruption. Any admin should feel free to override my decision —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going
disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors that go against several of Wikipedia's policies and ibox template guidelines.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued on-going sock-puppetry editing that goes against Wikipedia's policies on consensus and their own guidelines. Previous protections were from same kind of behaviors.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has been protected repeatedly in recent months, with vandalism resuming as soon as the protection expires.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few hours. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
19:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by Boing! said Zebedee.
BethNaught (
talk)
19:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs in range 170.158.137.xxx seem to be vandalizing this a good bit today.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
BethNaught (
talk)
19:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced content by IP user.
SOAD KoRn (
talk)
12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by three different IPs today. --
Michael Scott Cuthbert
(talk)
16:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism from various users.
Crboyer (
talk)
18:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Callmemirela 🍁
{Talk}
♑
12:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of a blocked and talk page access revoked user making appeals to unblock on my talk page. I can't unblock them and wouldn't if I could.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
17:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
17:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much vandalism here since the end of January, all by AIPs. I don't know enough about cricket to understand why.
ubiquity (
talk)
18:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs and some users are keen to change the content as per bias. Already, I have requested PP, but denies. However, dispute edits continues.
Antan
O
18:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
18:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
18:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after a month-long block and virtually every anonymous edit since then has been just that.
<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (
talk)
04:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Not high level.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeated recreation of an article that was deleted at AfD (see logs of
Einstein syndrome, which was salted a few weeks back).
DoctorKubla (
talk)
12:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deleted as G4 before.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Interstate 15 (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unprotection: I don't think this page needed to be protected in the first place because there was less vandalism.
- What's the point?! – Semiprotection expires in about 12 hours... --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
05:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – same problem with IP with a LONG history of disruptive edits/unsourced info about GSN becoming a 24 network dedicated to Steve Harvey.
Digifan23 (
talk)
23:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection for a few days. A very determined IP is moving from one IP address to another, and keeps trying to add unsourced nonsense to the lead sentence. --
Tryptofish (
talk)
00:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
12:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
DaltonCastle (
talk)
05:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP users keep changing the country of birth from FR Yugoslavia to Kosovo, but the convention is to keep the name of the country as it were on the day of birth.
Cashewnøtt (
talk)
09:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
12:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent episodes of vandalism to the article.
Nny84 (
talk)
10:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism.
172.56.38.186 (
talk)
00:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Most recent semi-protection was just removed, and the vandalism has started again. Requesting pending changes this time to see if that helps or makes any difference.
Favre1fan93 (
talk)
03:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Viewers of Trihex's
Twitch stream have been vandalizing the page at a very rapid rate.
Wzrds3 (
talk)
05:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Random IP repeatedly adding opinion to lead. While sourced to an Italian site, that does not specifically address ethical issues with day trading. The dynamic IP does not seem to want to participate in debate over the relevance and keeps adding the same opinions without further comment. Temporary protection may get them to engage in the discussion underway on the article talk page.
noq (
talk)
23:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Coordinated effort and/or sock puppetry is very likley here.
172.56.38.186 (
talk)
00:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Surprised this wasn't done by now - that page seems to be a magnet for test edits by new users for some reason. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
00:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
@
Bongwarrior: Thanks, however it appears as though the page is still unprotected. Can you fix this, please?
172.56.38.186 (
talk)
00:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Bongwarrior: Are you sure you want to permanently protect the sandbox. First, all sorts of welcome messages and level one warnings direct users and IPs to go there to make test edits. If they can't make edits there they are going to wonder why they were sent there. Next, it is better for the vandalism to happen there then in article space. Also, the nonsense posted there, if it doesn't get removed by other editors, is removed by Cyberbot 1 so there isn't damage to the rest of the encyclopedia. If it does get protected there is bound to be some blowback so you might want to discuss it at
WP:AN first. Thanks for you time in considering this.
MarnetteD|
Talk
01:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Gotta agree with MarnetteD here. I just manually cleared it; we could have Cyberbot clear it more frequently as opposed to protecting it. Dozens of templates and warnings and pages direct new users to experiment on that page. I think semi-protection would be an ungood thing that asks for all kinds of trouble.
Katie
talk
02:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done - Okay, fun's over. I'm marking this for the bot because it probably won't archive otherwise. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Almost all content has been removed by vandals. Valid and relevant citations and the content they referred to have been removed. Image has been removed without explanation. Many of these edits beginning the 28th of May, 2015 are from new user accounts with insufficient history. Some of the edits were already reverted by
Hgilbert, but the page has been vandalized again. Appears to be a coordinated effort or sock-puppetry over a period of more than 6 months.
Iwoo.222 (
talk)
00:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Katie
talk
02:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism, unsourced additions, edit warring and deliberate errors from IPs and new users.
LM2000 (
talk)
04:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
User:Wikimayor (
talk) 05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikimayor (
talk)
05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP edits subverting discretionary sanctions - very frustrating.
Martinevans123 (
talk)
20:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - only one IP recently - if the disruption worsens maybe full protection but I don't think it's that bad yet.
Alexius
Horatius
22:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP User has been vandalizing page, redirecting page to various articles.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
20:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - disruption appears to have died down.
Alexius
Horatius
22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
temporary-protection: - vandalism.--
BabbaQ (
talk)
20:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - not many anon edits and although the page is rather active it's not really experiencing the level of disruption usually required for full protection.
Alexius
Horatius
22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
20:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. There are numerous edits to this page that reflect partisan views on patent debates or potential opposition to the company on other grounds, and the only recourse is to delete those malicious edits, resulting in little/no content. I've made proposed edits on the Talk page, as instructed by an admin. I'd appreciate someone reviewing, and then proceeding with protection.
Vandewille (
talk)
19:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
21:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. See
[52] and
Talk:Sallekhana. -- Pankaj Jain
Capankajsmilyo (
talk ·
contribs ·
count)
19:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. (One of the editors has been blocked for 24 hours, situation will probably calm down a bit.)
Alexius
Horatius
21:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Alexius
Horatius
21:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Edit warring, and copyvio from an IP. Should be just long enough to get us all on the same page with guidelines.
Geogene (
talk)
19:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now - anon hasn't edited the article in almost 24 hours and appears to have taken it to the talk page.
Alexius
Horatius
21:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi protection. Also will be included in watchlist. Consider reprotecting if they begin afterwards as well.
Tharasanderson (
talk)
14:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Alexius
Horatius
18:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is 2. request, IP vandalizes, this module subpage should not be open to IP edits, editing links here influence thousands of pages, this is third attack in one week!.
Ąnαșταη (
ταlκ)
22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indef.
Alexius
Horatius
22:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
AlexiusHoratius, just FYI. This isn't really about vandalism, it is about the Kosovo dispute, and whether the location map for Serbia should present Kosovo as separate or part of Serbia. The map that was being inserted was one that showed Serbia without Kosovo. Cheers,
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP with a history of vandalism persistently edit-warring without using the talk page.
EtherealGate (
talk)
22:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
23:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
21:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
21:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
21:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of various IPs making changes against consensus. --
allthefoxes (
Talk)
21:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs 46.50.*.* edit warring.
SLBedit (
talk)
19:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
21:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. three days by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
22:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
20:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
20:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
20:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
21:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temp semi - Persistent IP vandalism.
BMK (
talk)
21:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temp semi - Same as above, persistent IP vandalism.
BMK (
talk)
21:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
21:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
22:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and the tournament hasn't started yet!
Lugnuts
Dick Laurent is dead
13:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Multiple userspace pages
No need for any of these to be edited, user request in own space, and older archives have been semi-protected.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
20:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
BethNaught (
talk)
21:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Steve Lux, Jr. (
talk)
20:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, typically somewhat juvenile, also on
XX/XY.
Trankuility (
talk)
02:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- That's disappointing. All edits since October 2015 are either IP vandalism or reverts.
Trankuility (
talk)
13:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yes... but I only count about 10-15 vandalism edits in more than 3 months...this is way from high level.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I would argue that when the fixes for vandalism so far outweigh substantive changes or improvements to the article then it's a problem that needs to be addressed. More so for
XX/XY.
Trankuility (
talk)
14:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
16:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Account blocked and rangeblock implemented.
Elockid
Message me
16:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP continues edit warring copyvio into article, talk page discussion not productive.
Geogene (
talk)
01:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
KungAvSand (
talk)
14:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for 24 hours by JamesBWatson.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism .
Mezigue (
talk)
15:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
15:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Various IPs reverting to push claims published by the subject's own publication which have been contradicted by reliable sources cited here.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
00:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Two of these accounts have been blocked as vandalism-only accounts. With this in mind, the socking is likley to continue.
172.56.38.35 (
talk)
01:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi-protection--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, as with
XXXY (film).
Trankuility (
talk)
02:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. A bit more vandalism than at the request above, but still way under the threshold for semi-protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Alterations being being made by
User: Cls14 based on subjected opinion and believed by the less charitable amongst us on behalf of the owner of the establishment mentioned in the amenities section for commercial interests.
149.254.218.85 (
talk)
00:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'd like it on record here that I removed a sentence that stated that a restaurant in the village was 'nicknamed' an 'eyesore'. I challenged this as it was not referenced. He then referenced a parish newsletter. I obtained a copy of the newsletter and it did not mention the word eyesore. He is angry as I have been removing unreferenced material.
Cls14 (
talk)
09:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Essentially 1 IP...
Lectonar (
talk)
09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
13:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Under recent vandalism and POV pushing since redirect to
chiropractic was approved at
RfD.
Delta13C (
talk)
10:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no reasons for the time being why it should be indefinitely protected. RfD did not actually approve anything, and the talk page discussion can be continued, if the reverting users finally find the talk page.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppetry and evasion by MariaJaydHicky. Using IP accounts following the indefinite block of a new registered account. —
Calvin999
11:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until Reddit and Kotaku calm down, (
https://www.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/459dxn/sjws_try_to_hijack_metal_gear_solid_v_wikipedia/) perhaps this article should be semi protected...?.
Glenzo999 (
talk)
03:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
13:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. --
HardstyleGB (
talk)
03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Fans (IP) adding their favorite artists on the 'performers' list, removing others.
Cornerstonepicker (
talk)
05:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Hirolovesswords (
talk)
01:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblock applied.
Elockid
Message me
05:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Hirolovesswords (
talk)
02:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblock applied.
Elockid
Message me
05:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
172.56.38.35 (
talk)
02:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Elockid
Message me
05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Hirolovesswords (
talk)
02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblock applied.
Elockid
Message me
05:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Elizium23 (
talk)
22:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - only one IP active. Either pursue
dispute resolution or report them at the 3rr noticeboard if they continue edit warring.
Alexius
Horatius
02:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring from user who will not provide reliable sourcing. --
Another Believer (
Talk)
23:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it is unfortunately nobody tried to talk to the new user.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
06:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Intentional
disruptive editing – Requesting this article be protected ASAP from IPs. I have no faith the current IP with a mission will stop with only this round of disruption as long as the article is in the process of GA review. The IP geolocates to the Bronx, NY (very possibly the same one that's been following me from article to article attempting to get me in to edit war for months) has just undone the work at the article I did last night, knowing I am on a 1RR restriction and cannot revert what they did. I would see this as vandalism since the "edit" has taken everything I improved according to suggestions at the GA review and undid them. Others might not see it as vandalism, so I'm not taking a chance at going beyond my 1RR restriction (as vandalism would be an exception to the restriction). Would appreciate protection at least until the GA review is done. Am pinging
Ritchie333 and
Drmies as they are both familiar with my restriction (and possibly this IP). --
WV ●
✉
✓
16:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- "I can't revert war so no one else should edit the page." LOL.
107.107.62.241 (
talk)
16:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- As a neutral observer, it's my view that this post alone is proof enough that WV's suspicions are not unfounded regarding the bad faith with which this IP user is editing.
Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (
My talkpage)
16:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The change I made is good, but someone disagrees solely for the sake of disagreeing. Who is truly the disruptive one in this case? (Hint: the one attempting to
own the page and game the system)
107.107.62.241 (
talk)
16:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- You are clearly trolling WV with your previous post to this page, and I've left a warning on your IP talkpage to that end.
Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (
My talkpage)
16:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I think it's now obvious this IP
vandal troll (who very well could be a known
WP:LTA IP that geolocates to the Bronx and NYC) is following me. A pox upon them! "LOL" --
WV ●
✉
✓
16:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
05:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous editing over a content dispute, despite talk page discussion trying to find a solution.
T
v
x1
20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Edit warring is by this editor now requesting full protection to enshrine their position. Other editors (including me) compromised and added cites to infobox. Full explanation in talk.
Legacypac (
talk)
20:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Contest above statement. I have request full protection so that we can allow the talk page discussion to run its course. The above editor and Lipsquid have been editing the article repeatedly over the last 24 hours over disputed content despite the talk page discussion and there not being evidence of a consensus for their position at all. That can be considered disruptive. The only aim of my edits and this request is to restore and stabilize the consensus version of that article that had now, for the disputed content, existed for about two months.
T
v
x1
20:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This request is another form of edit warring started by
T on the 9th where they willfully breached 1RR in less then an hour ignoring the huge warnings.
Legacypac (
talk)
21:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This request page is not the place to accuse other editors of "willfully breaching 1RR". I can also confirm that this request by
User:Tvx1 is being made totally in good faith.
Martinevans123 (
talk)
21:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now, at least. Hopefully enforcement of 1RR will work instead.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
01:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by the same user. It has repeatedly deleted airlines and routes from the destination tables on this page. This user has done the same action for 10+ times and it is slowly growing into an edit war with many airport editors.
*AirportUpdater* (
talk)
04:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Please take a look at
Nashville International Airport's page and view User: 2602:306:8330:C5F0:D543:C7AA:E420:1E0 actions. This user's numbers have changed each time it edits which might make it seems like it's multiple users, but it's not. Please protect this page.
*AirportUpdater* (
talk)
05:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered users.
TheBellaTwins1445(
talk) 3:56, February 10, 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Shouldn't be controlled by IP editors. —
cyberpower
Be my Valentine:Limited Access
02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Elockid
Message me
04:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dr.
K.
04:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
05:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing IP attacks.
Dr.
K.
04:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
SarahSV
(talk)
05:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: A persistent IP-hopping long-term disruptive editor that has necessitated protection of this article in the past has returned as soon as the last protection expired.
Deli nk (
talk)
21:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Karst (
talk)
22:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, persistent over a 24+hour period by various IPs and vandal-only accounts. --
WV ●
✉
✓
23:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: There is currently an
on-going discussion of the maps used on this page, and consensus has been reached regarding some of them. At least two IP users and one new user (perhaps all the same person) have been adding alternative maps and removing the maps that have gained consensus without engaging in discussion. The user(s) claim that the maps are unsourced, but that is
incorrect. The user(s) have been engaging in this activity now for several days, despite reversions by multiple editors, so protection would be appreciated.
Laszlo Panaflex (
talk)
23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content to lead.
Melcous (
talk)
23:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information by IP editors.
Bbb2007 (
talk)
23:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attacks from IPs.
Emotionalllama (
talk)
23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Currently there is some major confusion over whether or not certain pieces of information should be included in the infobox or not. Considering how important an article like this is in relation to the elections, wikipedia should strive to remain neutral. We are having major problems with people wanting wikipedia to be a "crystal ball". JP16103 05:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits from dynamic IP and sockpuppets.
Qed237
(talk)
15:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the album being released today there has been a number of nonsense edits.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
16:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I suggest a month of protection. This is also the second wave of vandalism and unsourced content from IPs for the article.
Aria1561 (
talk)
20:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Update: I'd just like to update to any admin scrolling through this page that I've had to revert about 50+ edits with unsourced material added by IPs. Thank you for your consideration.
Aria1561 (
talk)
00:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why this page is attracting so much vandalism and confused edits over the last day but it may need to be looked into.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
19:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP and un-autoconfirmed account vandalism. This page seems to have a very long history of vandalism and edit warring + edit wars.
172.56.38.186 (
talk)
00:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see an occasional contested edit (just two in the past 48 hours) from a dynamic IP. I also see lots of constructive editing by IPs so I am reluctant to semi-protect. I don't know about "very long history"; the article has never been protected before.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Racingmanager (
talk)
20:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Gilliam. —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism, especially from from IPs. Has been protected before and vandalism starts right back up once protection expires.
Katzenlibrary (
talk)
22:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent persistent removal of sourced content (without providing reason for the changes) by several IPs.
Crispulop (
talk)
23:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: recent uptick in vandalism from various IP addresses.
Dl2000 (
talk)
03:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death.
JMHamo (
talk)
21:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Could you please provide diffs? I could not find any vandalism.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
14:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP.
clpo13(
talk)
19:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by Ponyo.
BethNaught (
talk)
20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP.
clpo13(
talk)
19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by Ponyo.
BethNaught (
talk)
20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP.
clpo13(
talk)
19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by Ponyo.
BethNaught (
talk)
20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Protection Persistent
disruptive editing. – A specific user is constitantly attempting to revert while ignoring consensus on the talk page. In addition to the block i am advancing through the dispute resolution process, opening up a request for comment. I ask the page be protected until the dispute resolution process has run its course.
XavierGreen (
talk)
05:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The "persistent disruptive editing" here is by XavierGreen who seems to have a chronic case of
WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT.
Volunteer Marek (
talk) 0::6:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- A lengthy discussion on the issue was held here [
[53]], which clearly failed to produce a consensus to change the infobox from Geopolitical Organization to Warfaction. Despite the lack of consensus and objections from other users,
User:Volunteer Marek and
User:Iryna_Harpy have been consistantly attempting to force the change through anyway, putting vandalism warnings on the talk page of any editor who attempts to revert them. I have opened a request for comment on the talk page.
XavierGreen (
talk)
06:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Actually, it is XavierGreen who has been consistently editing against consensus and reliable sources. There have been other editors reverting this user. Please check the discussion on the talk page. In fact, it has gone beyond IDIDNTHEARTHAT to pure
WP:CRUSH. As pointed out to XavierGreen, it isn't even an issue for consensus, but one of policy. The use of a 'Geopolitical organizations' infobox was inappropriate after this article and the LPR article (below) used a 'country' infobox. This may have stood for a long time, but only due to the fact that all of the Ukrainian crisis articles were being edit warred by POV pushers from their inception with no hope of any sense being made of them until they'd stabilised to some degree. --
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
08:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined OP warned for discretionary sanctions.
BethNaught (
talk)
12:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Iryna : No, it is not original research , it's just an excuse to justify your forced passage . You did not have to change the page without consensus. If you are confident about yourself, why you have not started looking for a consensus? This is because you do not have one . And if you were not is that the majority of contributors do not agree that this is an original research. Your change is not collaborative . --
Panam2014 (
talk)
12:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Protection Persistent
disruptive editing. – A specific user is constitantly attempting to revert while ignoring consensus on the talk page. In addition to the block i am advancing through the dispute resolution process, opening up a request for comment. I ask the page be protected until the dispute resolution process has run its course.
XavierGreen (
talk)
05:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- As per the user's above request, there has been a protracted discussion on the DPR's talk page. This tactic of pushing for page protection for the user's preferred version is
WP:GAME. --
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
08:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined OP warned for discretionary sanctions.
BethNaught (
talk)
12:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Iryna : No, it is not original research , it's just an excuse to justify your forced passage . You did not have to change the page without consensus. If you are confident about yourself, why you have not started looking for a consensus? This is because you do not have one . And if you were not is that the majority of contributors do not agree that this is an original research. Your change is not collaborative . --
Panam2014 (
talk)
12:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A long drawn out edit war which involved Ip hoppers and now involves a new user. Requesting full prot before someone gets a block handed to them.(There have been no 3pr violations till now, the edit war is kinda slow burning). P.S I am uninvolved, just came here to read.
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
09:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
13:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Since the beginning of the year, only three registered editors have made edits to the article other than to revert vandalism or unsourced and inappropriate content. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
22:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of
∞, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page for a nonexistent user that keeps being recreated. Wondering also if sockpuppetry is in play. Asking for "temporary" in case an actual user creates this account, seems like a plausible username.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
12:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by
RHaworth for a period of
∞. After
∞ the page will automatically be unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP editor from the same range has been vanadlizing this page since December, 2015, returning after temp protections have expired. They are back again. The change is always to describe the product as "mayonnaise." Suggest a longer duration this time in hope they will go away...
Geoff |
Who, me?
13:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 63 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
00:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: To protect the page.
Prof TPMS (
talk)
00:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
14:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
I'd like to add a question to the
Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language page. The page is semi-protected, and so is the talk page. My question is as follows;
- Origin of the given name "jessica"
Hi. Re. the name "Jessica", the wikipedia article
Jessica_(given_name) says in the first paragraph that it comes from a Hebrew word meaning 'foresighted'. However, in the side-box of the article, it says it means 'wealthy'.
Googling a little gives me similar mixed results.
Thanks in anticipation of any answers :-)
81.108.18.234 (
talk)
04:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done. Posted to
WP:RD/L.
Tevildo (
talk)
11:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Musa
Talk
17:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
08:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and libel.
'''tAD''' (
talk)
01:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism in the past two weeks or so, with users adding false and/or speculative information, or removing existing information.WPA (
talk)
03:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Elockid
Message me
04:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Ch'marr (
talk)
02:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
02:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism in last couple of weeks or so.
Boomer Vial
Holla
04:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit early for indefinite. Let's try two weeks and see how that goes.
Elockid
Message me
04:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rampant vandalism over the past few days.
John from Idegon (
talk)
04:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, made a few blocks.
Elockid
Message me
04:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
HJ Mitchell.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes: Despite infrequent editing, there have been reverts within the past three to six months. Also, I asked the protecting administrator for the request, but he hasn't responded yet.
George Ho (
talk)
17:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Mr. Stradivarius.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 months didn't seem to stop the persistent vandalism. Requesting long term or indef semi-protection.
Majora (
talk)
23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
02:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
172.58.32.171 (
talk)
01:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs over a long period which is unlikely to ever go away owing to the association with the
Old Firm football derby.
The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk)
18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He has been informed he will not be resigned, but many are confusing this as released. he is still a Bear until March 2, but it keeps being changed.
TropicAces (
talk)
18:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping editor keeps adding unsourced information and unconstructive edits, like saying video games are banned because of "asteroid impact". Repeated warnings have not worked. A temporary edit protection might make clear Wikipedia is not the place for these lame jokes.
Soetermans.
T /
C
23:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP is reverting talk page to use as advertising.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
17:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
17:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a spambot IP.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a spambot IP, similar to
Talk:Tangled Ever After.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption and edit warring by IP-hopping editor.
Gnome de plume (
talk)
12:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1/52 of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
14:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption after this player just scored his first goal.
Qed237
(talk)
15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Extend pending changes or semi-protection - Edits have been reverted while administrator is inactive at the moment. --
George Ho (
talk)
04:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated disruption to lede by IPs.
Alexbrn (
talk)
06:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
13:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tag team idiocy in progress. Basically it is a steam of barely literate IP editors adding blatantly defamatory content to a BLP. Seems pointless to deal with them one by one. Lets just protect this for a while and hope they go away.
DanielRigal (
talk)
12:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since it's just IPs, semi will cover it. By the time they could get autoconfirmed accounts (which should hopefully be beyond their comprehension), the protection will have expired anyway.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
13:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
178.108.202.66 (
talk)
22:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
04:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Opencooper (
talk)
04:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent undiscussed changes of first word of article from "Somalis" to "Somalians" by IPs.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
08:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
08:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of IP vandalism, some bad enough that it had to be RevDeleted.
Seahorseruler
(Talk Page)
(Contribs)
08:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism/disruptive editing, carried out by a number of IPs and new accounts over the last 24 hours (ever since the previous protection expired). .
Vanamonde93 (
talk)
19:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
04:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Hoaxing by IPs from Mexico.
Binksternet (
talk)
20:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined for now. Gave the level 4 warning to your IP - it's static, so if he resumes, report him to AIV.
Katie
talk
04:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are misrepresenting sources and repeatedly adding hoax casting information. See
User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer for details.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
02:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. If it resumes, let us know. :-)
Katie
talk
04:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and socking/block evasion.
208.54.5.205 (
talk)
18:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: .
JO Bieson (
talk)
18:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
208.54.5.187 (
talk)
02:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
04:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued, on-going
disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors; by way of adding in
unverifiable information, and changing information that contradicts
reliable sources that are
cited within the article.
livelikemusic
talk!
00:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat)
01:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
clpo13(
talk)
00:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ponyo. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat)
01:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
clpo13(
talk)
00:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ponyo. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat)
01:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives almost constant vandalism from IP editors, with very few good faith changes from non-established users. It really needs to be semi-protected until the "meme" status of this game dies down.
Nathan2055
talk -
contribs
01:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also extended the pending changes to 3 months (originally set to expire in 8 days) as a precautionary measure once the semi-protection expires. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat)
01:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism and edit warring (without providing sources for the changes) from new mobile users and ISPs.
Blue
Riband►
21:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I don't see much vandalism. There has been some disagreement about things like verb tense and current status, but it looks as if those issues are under discussion at the talk page, as they should be.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 06:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Basketball player who has not officially retired yet but several IPs seem to think otherwise. —
DangerousJXD (
talk)
22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
22:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and 3RR violations.
208.54.5.205 (
talk)
18:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
EdJohnston..
MelanieN (
talk)
22:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over last couple of days consistently turning "Brian" into "Brain" at several spots. --
Tenebrae (
talk)
18:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content.
clpo13(
talk)
19:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unsigned users and accounts that are not autoconfirmed.
Parsley Man (
talk)
06:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is infrequent but persistent; previous short-term semi-protection hasn't really dealt with the problem; let's see what longer-term PC protection can do.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi protection An editor
151.237.102.118 who is linked
here as a confirmed IP-sock of
User:Sumatro persistently pushes undiscussed images by edit-warring, along with other IPs.
Serdik (
talk)
12:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits.
Qed237
(talk)
12:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses reverting without edit summaries or discussion on talk.
PeterTheFourth (
talk)
02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Disruptive editing by IP users.
Vipinhari ||
talk
15:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Openly racist, IP hopping vandal has caused the page to be protected multiple times before, but always returns when protection expires. The user has repeatedly added racial epithets to the article and/or edit comments, some of which have been redacted.
Zanhe (
talk)
18:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This is a tough call. There is a certain level of constructive IP editing, and since the protections have not escalated very high as yet, I have
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However in recognition of the long-term problem I have
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
19:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes:
WP:COI issues. An anonymous user claiming to be Gerard Fabiano has been removing sourced content from this article.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
22:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also softblocked the registered user as a username policy violation.
Katie
talk
18:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
17:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
18:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of anon IP vandals and unhelpful edits.
Montanabw
(talk)
08:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoaxing again. Block evasion by
Special:Contributions/187.172.105.221. Multiple IPs.
Binksternet (
talk)
14:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People jumping the gun and changing content, which will not happen before 1 July.
Kante4 (
talk)
14:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection ended on the weekend and the unconstructive edits have returned.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
14:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple IP's from the same place in Australia keep on editing the page, saying that it is a Utility Vehicle. It's only known as a Utility Vehicle there. This has been going on for a few weeks. The IP's have been constantly reverting when their edits are reverted by other users, including me and think they are right, and every time it happens, it results in an edit war, so i think it needs protection to solve the dispute.
.
Class455fan1 (
talk)
14:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
15:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
16:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The previous protection expired earlier today, and there's already an entire drawer's worth of socks hard at work there...
Thomas.W
talk
17:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant effort to add "Jew" as the name of the person which doesn't appear to be the case.
Muzammil (
talk)
07:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Now its weird spellings - Joeseph Philbin, Joenathan Philbin, etc. I've reverted twice - wouldn't like to venture for the third time. --
Muzammil (
talk)
07:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An IP continues to remove sourced content and add POV without responding to discussion on user page or talk page.
Wcp07 (
talk)
10:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: The format in which I had the page for a while, showing the film title, the release date, the wrestler featured and the studio seems to be working and I think it should stay this way in the future. I am also a frequent editor of this article and would love it to keep up with the consistency.
SJJM4EVER (
talk)
11:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- With respect, this would not appear to be a good/valid reason for page protection; no evidence of vandalism or disruptive editing is provided. Other editors should have the chance to contribute unobstructed; cf.
WP:OWN. -
Ryk72
'c.s.n.s.'
11:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined
SJJM4EVER, please use the article's talk page and try to gain concensus if you want something like that implemented.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection. I've created it as {{
R from typo}} for
county, but as this has a history of being used for vandalism (see all three past deletions) by registered users, I expect its existence to make it a target for IP vandalism. Aside from the possibility of sending it to
cunt, I can't imagine any way to make a good-faith changes to this redirect. Since I've just created it, protecting it myself might be seen as WP:INVOLVED.
Nyttend (
talk)
15:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected
Lectonar (
talk)
15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls.
Nodayrt (
talk)
20:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done
Lectonar (
talk)
10:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long-term vandalism. If not indefinite, a long temporary protection is advised/encouraged.
Nodayrt (
talk)
23:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done
Lectonar (
talk)
10:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam page by confused spammer, created 3 times in an hour.
NeemNarduni2 (
talk)
12:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done for a ten-day period.
Nyttend (
talk)
14:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new accounts.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
23:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: At least for a week. We have IP users adding content, stating that he has left Seattle, but it's not official yet which is a violation of
WP:CRYSTAL. –
Michael (
talk)
00:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Page has been protected several times previously against efforts of a disruptive IP editor with an apparent COI. After a respite, the disruptive edits have resumed.
JohnInDC (
talk)
02:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try this first....
Lectonar (
talk)
11:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Request for protection while a Good Article Review is occuring. High level of IP vandalism.
SatDis (
talk)
05:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I support the above request, the article was previously protected and almost immediately after its lifting an anonymous IP made a series of disruptive edits. I'm the GA reviewer and would rather be completing that process than dealing with annoying vandals: make WP better by reducing their opportunities.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
07:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please ping me if protection seems no longer necessary.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – [Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:33, 2 March 2016) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:33, 2 March 2016) (Persistent disruptive editing).
Unguriu (
talk)
16:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined. I don't see a lot of vandalism, and most IP editing appears to be constructive. I do see edit warring (by autoconfirmed users) over a subject which has been extensively discussed at the talk page, and I will comment on that at the appropriate user talk page.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
MelanieN: I have
commented on the article's talk page, and I ask you to take a look at what I said, because I think there may be some important aspects.
LjL (
talk)
02:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'll reply at your talk page. --
MelanieN (
talk)
04:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
10:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
temporary semi-protection: Edit war over superdelegate counts. Requesting protection before this gets worse. This has been argued multiple times in the talk page and we have a solution agreed upon. We need this protection to prevent an edit war and to protect the neutrality of wikipedia.. JP16103 17:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2602:306:3357:BA0:383E:3FA3:2868:37E5 (
talk)
23:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Nyttend for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
09:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Many of the recent edits have been fancruft inflations of revenue, which will likely continue if this isn't semi-protected soon. Article was previously protected for a week.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
19:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a long history of vandalism and BLP violations. If not indefinite, a long-term temporary/recent changes protection is encouraged/advised here.
Nodayrt (
talk)
20:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Just one user was causing problems recently, and they have now been blocked.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —
Frosty
☃
07:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls.
Nodayrt (
talk)
20:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done The last two edits, made after you left this request, are constructive. At the same time, I can see a lot of disruptive editing; I'll leave a note at talk regarding the advisability of temporary semiprotection.
Nyttend (
talk)
00:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly being vandalized/introduction of factual errors.
Boomer Vial
Holla
03:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism —
Myasuda (
talk)
03:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent death of
Antonin Scalia has led to much talk of Srinivasan being a potential nomination to the Supreme Court, which per
WP:CRYSTAL wouldn't belong in his article.
Furorimpius (
talk)
07:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined. Whether this kind of information belongs in the article is currently under discussion at the talk page. Work it out there. In any case, semi-protection would not prevent this kind of material, since it is being added (with references) by auto-confirmed users.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Sock puppetry.
112.198.90.2 (
talk)
12:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. In fact most of the editing of this page is done by IPs, and most of it appears to be constructive.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and non-confirmed accounts. Much of the vandalism is extremely inappropriate (including references to Hitler, overt sexual references, etc.). Examples:
[54],
[55],
[56],
[57],
[58],
[59],
[60],
[61]. Page previously has had protection for sockpuppetry and also recently for vandalism.
Chrisw80 (
talk)
22:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
03:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protection level 1: High levels of vandalism or BLP violations from unregistered and new users. I am not an editor of this page (I'm not even a fan of the music genre) but I stumbled across it and noted the editing history is flooded with reverts. Artist is clearly notable (see these articles by
Forbes and
Spin magazines) but the Wikipedia article appears unable to move forward as so much energy is being spent undoing edits.
Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's
Articulations &
Invigilations)
19:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the vandalism is too frequent for PC to work well.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a long history of vandalism and BLP violations. If not indefinite, a long-term temporary/recent changes protection is encouraged/advised here.
Semi-protected indefinitely.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The ride is rumored to be removed, but has yet to be confirmed. The removal should be confirmed next weekend. Until then, it should be protected so that it is not constantly vandalized.
Astros4477 (
Talk)
20:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls.
Nodayrt (
talk)
20:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
02:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2602:306:3357:BA0:B405:1D0E:C4BC:EA9A (
talk)
18:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Nyttend..
MelanieN (
talk)
01:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subjected to repeated vandalism and content blanking from IP addresses.
T.C.Haliburton
talk nerdy to me
18:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Moderate level of IP vandalism over the past few months.
Where we're going, we don't need roads. (
talk)
19:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editor has returned to do the same vandalism... .
Nomoskedasticity (
talk)
11:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection expired Feb. 13; vandalism from dynamic IP resumed immediately.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruption resumed immediately after previous protection expired.
Widr (
talk)
14:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed virtually continuous protection for all of its short life.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Rapid/Disruptive editing by multiple un-autoconfirmed accounts and IPs.
Nodayrt (
talk)
06:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations. No constructive edits by IP or new users for almost a month.
Qzd (
talk)
20:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of the election campaign, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
20:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism after recent protection period.
Nodayrt (
talk)
20:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of the election campaign, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
20:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
20:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by user 182.59.82.191. The person also deleted a level 1 warning against vandalism from his/her talk page. A level 2 warning has been posted on his/her
talk page. To prevent him/her from further rampant deletion, a semi-protection has to be added to the page. Thank you. —
Deepak_HK「
@talk」
16:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Naval battles - persistent sock puppetry & block evasion
Temporary semi-protection: Chronic sock puppetry and block evasion, including persistent insertion of unsourced / poorly sourced material - see page histories,
Talk page and
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/UnbiasedVictory/Archive.
JohnInDC (
talk)
20:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both articles.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
GAB
Hello!
15:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Fancruft additions, which will likely continue if this remains unprotected. Previous protection was for one month.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
17:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 3 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
19:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Currently being bombarded by various IPs in the 205.125.33.x range
Egsan Bacon (
talk)
20:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
05:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's are edit warring among themselves and the stability of this article has now gone to dogs.
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
07:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
GAB
Hello!
15:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Several of the problem editors have been blocked, but they were not the only ones. This article has really been under siege.
MelanieN (
talk)
19:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See also
Dharampal singh malik (currently up for speedy). —/
Mendaliv/
2¢/
Δ's/
01:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Also note that the page creator has started socking. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chapter1947. —/
Mendaliv/
2¢/
Δ's/
10:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Sıgehelmus
(Talk) |д=)
02:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
03:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also repeatedly recreated at
Vishal malik (currently up for speedy, again). —/
Mendaliv/
2¢/
Δ's/
01:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Also note that the page creator has started socking. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chapter1947. —/
Mendaliv/
2¢/
Δ's/
10:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. And page deleted.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Frankie
talk
11:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Coffee for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be attracting a good bit of vandalism today. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
13:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Edgar181 for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracting much vandalism this morning. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
14:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Edgar181 for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes s4 & 5
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring despite both a local consensus and a
WikiProject consensus against misusing the FirstEngAirDate parameter.
Opencooper (
talk)
06:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This seems to have been overlooked, so a note that this is still open and the editors involved are continuing to edit war and not use talk pages.
Opencooper (
talk)
06:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., both--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Numerous edits from multiple anonymous users (some of which seem to be the same user from multiple IP addresses). Extreme persistence in adding certain acts to "Associated acts" while removing others. Despite a talk on one of the IP's pages, and a willingness to compromise by including his desired act into the "Associated acts", he/she continue to remove others from the infobox. Malintent can be seen in how the user insists on inserting his/her desired acts in the forefront of the "Associated acts" list, while more notable acts are left for latter down the list. Anyone knowledgeable on the subject, would know Dame Grease and French Montana are much more significant in their association with article subject Max B. Furthermore, a verification of any of Max B's discography shows references to "associated acts" Al Pac, Mak Mustard and Stack Bundles in the tracklisting. For example- a look at the MOB tape
[63] show references towards Stack Bundles, while a look into any of
Max's records between 2008-2010 including his album
Vigilante Season show mentions of Al Pac and/or Mak Mustard. Furthermore, citations remain scattered throughout the article itself (where relevant), yet disputing user references "non-notability" as reason during his/her edits.
DA1 (
talk)
20:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- In my edit, i made sure to include Isaiah Toothtaker, whilst restoring mentions of Young Los, Mak Mustard, Al Pac and Stack Bundles in the "Associated acts". However, you repeatedly removed those acts, despite the several references to those acts in the article.
DA1 (
talk)
22:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The several references to those acts is not sufficient to add them to the infobox. See
Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts.
153.205.18.1 (
talk)
22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
[71] All make mention of Mak Mustard and Al Pac. The "
Charge It To The Wave" DVD and "
Coke Wave DVD" further mention these artists. Anyone who is familiar with Max's music, will be aware of these associated acts. As would they be familiar with producer Young Los, also cited in the article here
[72]. Additional materials of reference:
[73]
[74]
[75] and
[76]
DA1 (
talk)
22:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I think you have to familiarize yourself with the
WP:SOURCE policy.
153.205.18.1 (
talk)
22:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Film and music records are relevant sources, especially given the nature of the article subject. This seems to be a purely one way dispute from your end. One could easily begin make similar fallacious disputes against your desired "associated act", since your are unwilling to accept the numerous sources provided to you regarding the others, whom we have footage of with Max B and numerous references in his records and music, alongside the films and articles cited. In any case, I will leave it for the mods to decide. I've made my point.
DA1 (
talk)
22:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Baby
miss
fortune
01:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Typical new Indian film release vandalism.
Nairspecht (
talk)
08:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – parent template is protected as is another subtemplate. Created this subtemplate to make parent template comply with
WP:COLOR.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
19:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template protected
Lectonar (
talk)
08:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Yes it is...I think.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit-warring. Discussion now returned to ANI. .
Burninthruthesky (
talk)
10:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
11:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection:
Samsung galaxy S7 was created and stubified per the recent, accidental confirmation of the phone.
ViperSnake151
Talk
05:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done by Philg88.
tutterMouse (
talk)
10:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection, perhaps for a month. IP and new editors keep rewriting the article, I suspect with the aim at advertising a hostel. The last attempt is particularly concerning due to the untruthful nature of the
edit summary (they are restoring their own version, not the original).
Number
5
7
17:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 3 in a month after so few edits over the course of years isn't too disruptive.
only (
talk)
01:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: IP user consistently deleting sourced and valid information.
Nixin1976 (
talk)
01:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
01:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
112.198.101.55 (
talk)
02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
03:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
112.198.101.55 (
talk)
02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
112.198.101.55 (
talk)
02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: the page history has become (again) a mess of back-and-forth modifications of the claimed range of this generation, mostly by passing-by IP addresses. This has been a long-term problem.
LjL (
talk) 17:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Potentially even consider full protection as some established editors have started piling on to the edit wars without distinguishing themselves from the more anonymous users by explaining the reasons for their edits and reverts using edit summaries or otherwise.
LjL (
talk)
21:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. I know there was an ANI thread about this (last week?) so I'm going to send you to AN3 for more thorough investigation.
Katie
talk
18:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
7&6=thirteen (
☎)
18:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - report was good at the time but it looks like the disruptive edits have stopped.
Alexius
Horatius
01:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Genre-warring from abusive IP editor.
Mezigue (
talk)
19:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - IP has been warned about edit warring and it looks like it's been the only one lately.
Alexius
Horatius
01:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by likely the same person whose socks have just been blocked.
Hzh (
talk)
02:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
only (
talk)
03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection, less than 1300 transclusions.
117Avenue (
talk)
00:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Alexius
Horatius
01:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – need a short term protection from an IP-jumper making vandalizing/unconstructive additions.
☾Loriendrew☽
☏(ring-ring)
01:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: there was recently a request for protecting this page, but it was denied as the main culprit was
Unguriu, an autoconfirmed account, now blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet, part of a series that have edit warred on the article for a long time. But now the same edits are being made
by an IP address in a different range from the one linked to Unguriu before, so I don't know that chasing the ever-changing addresses would be easier than just semi-protecting the page (again). Pinging in particular
MelanieN who is aware of the situation and dealt with the previous request.
LjL (
talk)
02:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been under vandalism threat for several weeks now. The most common type of vandalism is page and section blanking.
Fdssdf (
talk)
02:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Elizium23 (
talk)
02:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
MelanieN (
talk)
20:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and addition of false unsourced content.
The1337gamer (
talk)
19:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
20:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
21:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
00:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: This person is the subject of a high-profile trial, I have already reverted one anon edit as inappropriate in view of legal issues.
PatGallacher (
talk)
02:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
18:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: ongoing edit wars, short of 3RR (despite claims), concerning issues debated on the talk page at length, among established editors. Recent history shows this has reached disruptive levels.
LjL (
talk)
02:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. If it resumes tomorrow,
WP:AN3 is thataway.
Katie
talk
18:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor keeps changing against consensus. Repeated warnings have not worked. Perhaps a temporary edit block shows this is not how we do things on Wikipedia.
Soetermans.
T /
C
14:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Katie
talk
18:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – suspicious activity has started again after being unprotected only a short time ago.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only IP edits since protection expired were test edits.
Katie
talk
18:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting that the talk page rights be revoked for user after vulgar personal attacks.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
16:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
Katie
talk
17:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Aaarghh... okay, how about
-
User(s)
blocked. with talk page access revoked. (I love Cyberbot.)
Katie
talk
18:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Everymorning
(talk)
16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Overtly biased edits have been plaguing this article. Disruptive edits and their reverts are the majority of the edits on this page.
Mr. Guye (
talk)
02:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The level of disruption is far under the threshold even for pending changes protection; we're talking about at most 2 dozen edits the last year here.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down.
Qed237
(talk)
16:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
18:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing the article. It may not be immediately apparent that the edits are vandalism, as some of the changes may look as though they are being made in good faith, but as noted on the talk page, on close examination it's clear they are vandalism - for example, they deliberately misidentify the article subject's non-fiction books as novels.
FreeKnowledgeCreator (
talk)
23:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. Alternatively,
warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.
FreeKnowledgeCreator
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Because of the subject's increased prominence of the US presidential campaign, this article is attracting more unsourced edits and such.
Mr. Guye (
talk)
02:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. If the unsourced or poorly sourced content was added more and started to look more like a BLP violation of one of the candidates then I would consider it.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: A lot of promotional content has been added to the page by unregistered users in past. Due to this, the page did not meet encyclopedia standards and quality content was also deleted. Sanjeev Sharma 09:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. But well done on your recent improvements to the article. If the promoters come back and are persistent, ask again here.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
15:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Keeps being recreated after CSD deletions --
samtar
whisper
16:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Scott. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move protection: Keeps on being moved by sock.
Qed237
(talk)
16:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Move protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down.
Qed237
(talk)
16:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down.
Qed237
(talk)
16:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down.
Qed237
(talk)
16:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Outbreak of vandalism with potentially libellous comments.
LynwoodF (
talk)
12:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: subject to very regular vandalism from IPs and new accounts.
LibStar (
talk)
14:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
15:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Frankie
talk
21:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long-term IP abuse.
Cidemoc (
talk)
00:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by un-autoconfirmed accounts and IP's.
Cidemoc (
talk)
01:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Because of the nature of the article, this page has drawn vandals. IPs and others have been attacking this article frequently.
Mr. Guye (
talk)
02:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: A single anon IP, the SPA
213.1.8.136, has been edit-warring to add ethnicity unrelated to the subject's notability, despite two registered editors — myself and
User:Hegvald — pointing out on the talk page that the anon IP is violating
MOS:BLPLEAD. Instead of attempting to seek consensus, he has behaved belligerently, writing, "Hegvald, are you a racist against Chinese people?" and throwing other insults. He is now on the cusp of
3RR, but rather than edit-war with him, I ask for page protection. --
Tenebrae (
talk)
02:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Zoupan
03:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Petty vandalism + unsourced revisions + promotional content.
Nairspecht (
talk)
16:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Polmandc (
talk)
04:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
05:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple new accounts and IPs
Meters (
talk)
05:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism for a period of two months.
Shhhhwwww!! (
talk)
06:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High rate of IP vandalism, likely due to Laennec being the subject of today's Google Doodle. --
Perey (
talk)
07:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
08:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Page was protected once; since expiration, edits have not stopped. See page history. All by one person. Indefinite, preferably. Something needs to be done about that sock though. They have used at least ten different IPs and possibly one account, although the account is only possible and not a sure thing like all the IPs. I am unfamiliar with how busting socks or taking action against socks works so I can't do anything there. —
DangerousJXD (
talk)
09:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive edits from IP users with the same prefix 2600:1006:b1xx:*, falsifying how song did on the record charts as well as its sales certifications. This same family of IP users has also been disrupting other Green Day related articles, including recently semi-protected
Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Green Day song).
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
02:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent sockpuppetry.
Cidemoc (
talk)
03:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by KrakatoaKatie for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page has been semi-protected once before (for a week
here by
AlexiusHoratius), but the IPs are back again so perhaps a longer period of protection is warranted this time around. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
06:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – We have a case of an Internet vigilante persistently trying to add an entry to the article without properly factoring in the inclusion criteria, instead resorting to deceit and edit warring. This his 16th attempt since 27 December 2015. When mentioned the source issue, he called me "bloody and clueless idiot incapable of reading referenced book". This page was once previously been protected because of the same editor by
CambridgeBayWeather. But the editor came back today.
Codename Lisa (
talk)
22:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked:
31 hours (
talk ·
contribs).
Nyttend (
talk)
02:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by un-autoconfirmed accounts and IP's.
Cidemoc (
talk)
00:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
only (
talk)
01:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.
TheBellaTwins1445(
talk) 7:18, February 16, 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
only (
talk)
01:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Consistent deletion of the links to the relevant videos the article is listing, verging on 3RR violation.
El Nero Diablo (
talk)
06:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Please hold on this. The user above has reverted my attempt at a discussion on this topic on their talk page. None have violated 3RR.
Alex|The|Whovian
?
06:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- By the nature of having "verged on" violation of 3RR means it's not yet violated the rule but would have if one more reversion happens by either side, thus why I called for the protection BEFORE either side violated the rule.
El Nero Diablo (
talk)
06:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Doesn't really explain why you initially
reverted my attempt at a discussion, does it? And actually, violating
3RR means more than three reverts. So, definitely not "one more reversion by either side".
Alex|The|Whovian
?
06:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This request is no longer required, discussion has been worked out on user talk page though it should have been on article talk page initially anyway.
El Nero Diablo (
talk)
03:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Time to Time Vandalism. He is the president of Uganda, and with the recent presidential elections in the country this week the number of vandal edits are rising. I predict after he wins the election there will be some angry people too.
Sputink (
talk)
23:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Katie
talk
01:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Cidemoc (
talk)
00:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Katie
talk
01:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent change of valid links.
Jetstreamer
Talk
00:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Jetstreamer: I don't understand. The archive.today links don't work for me, while the archive.is links do. Why do you say they're valid links, and why should we protect the page given that they don't work? (You don't need to ping me when you answer - I should see it.)
Katie
talk
00:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, you're right. They were working a few weeks ago. I think I should revert my recent edits regarding this. Thanks for the heads up and disregard this request.--
Jetstreamer
Talk
01:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn by requestor Thanks! :-)
Katie
talk
01:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
02:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
20:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
02:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Some ip-hopper keeps removing stuff and gripping about the sequel.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
22:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nyttend (
talk)
02:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism and unexplained removal of content. Previous protection was set at one week.
Originalchampion (
talk)
17:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Yaris678 (
talk)
21:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
DavidLeighEllis (
talk)
00:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Katie
talk
01:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
00:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be attracting a lot of negative attention today. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
13:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
MelanieN (
talk)
18:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
MYS
77
✉
14:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Several of the recent IP edits have been useful. Indeed, some IPs are reverting the small amount of IP vandalism this page gets.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
MYS
77
✉
14:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- IMYS77, can see you are having trouble with some new users which may actually be the same user. If this continues, consider reporting it to
WP:ANI.
Yaris678 (
talk)
19:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –
Challenge season articles have a long history of being plagued by
unsourced spoiler vandalism and additions of poorly-sourced content by IP users throughout their initial
MTV run. On average, Challenge season articles run for about 2 1/2 months — per a short trailer on MTV.com, the season will not premiere until May 2016. With that said, I recommend a 6-month semi-protection in order to block any potential unwanted IP spoiler vandalism.
DPH1110 (
talk)
06:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we do not protect pages pre-emptively, and the amount of vandalism so far would not justify 6 month protection. However, I see your point, and if vandalism resumes after 2 weeks, I believe the chance the page would be 6 months semi-protected then is big.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full-protection: These pages will be appearing on the Main Page tomorrow, but because they are added randomly, therefore the cascade protection doesn't work. See
this ERRORS report about a previous case.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
13:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Both.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we just make this article fully autoconfirmed protected? Persistent simmering vandalism (usually by new editors or IPs) adding content that associates Ted Cruz w/ZK. Same problems happening at the Cruz article (which at this time is autoconfirmed protected).
Shearonink (
talk)
18:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Reaffirming my request. Persistent, systemic vandalism by IPs today adding content - either text or images - equating Cruz with ZK. Pending Changes not enough in my opinion.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you. It's a viral-joke - starting in January on Twitter that has migrated onto WP's pages.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Just checked the page, but now it's under full admin/template editor protection....
Shearonink (
talk)
19:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done Old admin groping around for his glasses....
Lectonar (
talk)
19:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
03:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism.
JO Bieson (
talk)
03:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users making unnecessary edits. Karthik 04:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Work out your content disagreement on the talk page.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered editors insist in changing official language from English to Arabic, without consensus and an accredited source.
B.Lameira (
talk)
18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Long time Semi-protection: Again, after protection expiration, standard vandalism by restoration of talk page comments by socks of indef blocked
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. -
DVdm (
talk)
13:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
DVdm: Leave me a list of the IPs and I'll block them a while longer for block evasion.
Katie
talk
17:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Days of vandalism calling GitHub "anti-white" (probably stemming from
this article) mostly IPs but there have been users doing it.
Emotionalllama (
talk)
16:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same user is back pushing the same unreferenced POV.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
17:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's some socking going on here too, and one of these guys is close to autoconfirmed.
Katie
talk
17:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term content dispute between newly created users/IPs and a couple of established editors.
This is the most recent issue caused, but reading above the linked section will give some background. I'm attempting to work with
Jkxyz to sort this out. Thanks. --
samtar
whisper
22:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Thank you for your efforts.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing –
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 prohibits IP editors from editing this article and any other articles broadly related to Israel/Palestine. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
02:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection recently expired and the vandalism just continued again.
Opencooper (
talk)
02:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
15:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few hours. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
20:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and unconstructive editing by an editor using a dynamic IP address. Previous blocks and attempts to discuss the content changes have not dissuaded this IP editor, who has stated his/her intention to continue making a controversial change despite lacking consensus:
[77] -
Kudzu1 (
talk)
04:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. I will watchlist.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Let's see how it goes with PC. .
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
22:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Lectonar (
talk)
12:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits almost daily since February 8, with numerous unconstructive edits today.
EricEnfermero (
Talk)
02:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sixth o
f March
08:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A gazillion IP edits, most of one character? Same as at Madame Doubtfire article.
Aloha27
talk
11:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
20:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: I have no idea what's happening on this page. Over the past few minutes, an IP editor has made over 250 to this page. Some appear helpful (although I haven't had a chance to check yet) but the vast majority consist of adding a space, then deleting it again. I don't know if protection is the best option or whether a block would be better, but it's just clogging up the page history at the moment.
Absconded Northerner (
talk)
09:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This high-profile page seems to attract a lot of casual and silly vandalism from first-time editors. PC seems to work quite well at the London Eye article, which has similar issues - could we please try it here? Thanks.
.
DBaK (
talk)
10:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
10:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you.
DBaK (
talk)
10:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
19:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
21:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent, potentially libelous vandalism on this high-profile BLP (almost 250,000 views this past month) - the latest vandalism standing for almost 24 hours, which is unacceptable. Indefinite semi-protection requested until after the campaign.
Tvoz/
talk
03:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/Disruptive Editing started after the protection expired.
Musa
Talk
17:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 until March 3.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
19:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Lectonar.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – (again) Article has previously required protection. IP-hopping editor keeps trying to remove the same material over and over to whitewash the article. Because it is not always the same anon IP (and because there appears to have been at least one COI account created for the same purpose) this article needs indefinite semi-protection; blocking the user or the IPs seems to be ineffective.
Montanabw
(talk)
19:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The SCP Foundation article has been receiving fairly consistent vandalism for awhile, mainly claiming that it is a real organization or changing the description of one of the SCPs, SCP-426, to the first person (in-universe, SCP-426 is a toaster that can only be referred to in the first person). This is becoming a waste of everyone's time, and I'd like for this page to be placed under pending change protection.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk)
06:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of this article is the topic of a lot of news coverage right now, which results in a lot of IPs coming by with unsourced content additions. I'm counting at least 5 separate ones in the last 24 hours. Temporary semi- until this cools off. .
Vanamonde93 (
talk)
06:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection for three months: When protection lapsed last week, vandalism picked up right where it left off, and is likely to continue as long as
his son remains heavily in the public eye.
p
b
p
17:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
23:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
00:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Someone keeps adding a non-notable person to the list and in the criminal section (as far as I can tell, they have never been convicted of crime, but there seems to be a controversy surrounding this individual in Thailand).
Patken4 (
talk)
01:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 3 months.
EdJohnston (
talk)
03:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
15:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Please relist if it picks up.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
User block, protection or semi-protection: this blocked user has repeatedly abused their own talk page (see history) including messing with unblock review templates. I think the best route would be to revoke talk page access from the particular user, rather than protecting the page, but I am unsure of the best venue to request that. Please direct me for next time.
LjL (
talk)
18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done I've removed their talkpage access instead — please come back if, well, if there is IP abuse. And now I suppose I have to revdel stuff... groan... OK, I will.
Bishonen |
talk
18:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It's not my fault if I'm Jennifer Lopez!
LjL (
talk)
18:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Matches started this week and disruption continued (and will get worse).
Qed237
(talk)
20:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably one user acting with sockpuppets, an SPI case is already opened. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
17:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts vandalizing and blanking content.
Stevie is the man!
Talk •
Work
19:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unofficial free agent signing information.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
20:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
2607:FB90:A52B:E806:0:44:44BC:7101 (
talk)
20:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persist disruptive/copyvio edits by fresh and IP accounts.
Alexbrn (
talk)
07:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Recent page protection expired and a new protect needs to be for a much longer time.
Delta13C (
talk)
11:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IP vandalism over the past 24 hours.
Karst (
talk)
08:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of copy/pasted material from
http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/bucks/vol2/pp281-286 which is public domain thought the page is tagged This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved. A previous cycle resulted in a blocked anon and an IP change.
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Article was recently
semi'd for 1 week, now unprotected, and problematic anon has resumed the same behavior with no change:
[78]
[79]. IPs of anon are not consistent, so semi-protection is the only effective means of curbing the disruption. Request a longer period this time, say 2 weeks. --
IllaZilla (
talk)
15:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP, inserting flowery language and making the lead sound like a fan page or agent's press release. Wikipedia policy on neutrality and peacock language explained on talk page but IP just ignores it. Source given (MTV) does not justify the language either. Request revert to previous version (don't want to look like I'm edit-warring) and semi-protection.
MaxBrowne (
talk)
15:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which is the adding of non-existing future films. May be socks of Harrysstoller.
Spshu (
talk)
15:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page (and perhaps other candidates in the Uganda election) should probably be protected for a week or two. Tis attracting a lot of vandalism.
Xmp (
talk)
15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
20:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
16:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. one month by another admin.
Alexius
Horatius
20:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors, who are editing against
reliable sources.
livelikemusic
talk!
02:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by DragonflySixtyseven for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
18:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur this month. --
George Ho (
talk)
08:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly released video game, part of long-running and popular series. Unconstructive and/or vandalism edits have been reverted repeatedly. A temporary edit protection should do the trick.
Soetermans.
T /
C
16:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Sergecross73 for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
18:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and other unconstructive edits within the past hour.
Entranced98 (
talk)
00:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Far from all Ip-edits are unconstructive or vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Chesdovi continuously adds POV information, resulting in reverts, see the talk page where he admits he is a POV pusher. He was told to seek consensus before adding in contentious information. He is trying to make it seem that the Western Wall is not a holy site for the Jews because he is an anti-Zionist. I am seeking semi-protection so that discussions can happen on the talk page, reach a consensus and then be brought into the main page.
Sir Joseph
(talk)
04:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- More inflammatory remarks by SJ. He seems oblivious to policy guidelines on things as basic as RS and OR. I am all for reaching consensus, but he seldom replies, and when he does it is a never ending back and forth with arguments which do not align with policy, not to mention the never ending swipes and personal attacks. SJ needs to learn that other people have alternative views which they are entitled to have.
Chesdovi (
talk)
05:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- And that is why I want the page protected. You continue to add stuff to the main page without reaching consensus.You tried creating a page
Jewish boycott of the Western Wall, that was deleted, you then tried to merge that into this article and that was reverted and then on the talk page you just keep adding section upon section of whatever source you can google to suit your POV no matter how fringe or minor it is. That is why I want the page protection, to protect the integrity of the article. All one has to do is look at the history of the article at your contributions and at the reverts done by not just me, but by others to see that you are the disruptive editor here.
Sir Joseph
(talk)
05:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- So am I not to post even to talk? What is this? Why have you not yet replied to
this? I waited a week at
Mea Shearim, you did not reply, and then removed text a second time:
[80],
[81]. I do not "keep adding" the same material. But you keep revert any thing I edit, even seemingly "non-contentious" material. What you mean by the "integrity" of the article is to keep it with it's pro-Jewish, Pro-Israeli and pro-Zionist slant. You care not one iota about any other section of the page. That is evidence of a disruptive POV.
Chesdovi (
talk)
05:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I didn't respond to you because that is already in the article. I reverted your Meah Shearim reverts because that is a stupid entry. Just because the PA met with some residents in a PR stunt doesn't mean it gets to be in the article. Meah Shearim is part of Israel, it's inside the Green Line, why would it be part of the PA, so it's clearly POV and FRINGE to include. I revert what you edit if it's clear that it's a disruptive edit, like your
Jewish boycott of the Western Wall article and similar edits. We get it, you hate Zionists and wish Israel to be destroyed, but you still need to follow Wikipedia policies while you do so.
Sir Joseph
(talk)
07:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: None of pending edits by newly registered editors were good.
George Ho (
talk)
08:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- If the edits weren't constructive, isn't semi-protection a better option than extending PC knowing it isn't working?
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again reporting here due to a course of IP vandalism started again right after its protection tenure. Diffs are here, well take a look (
[82],
[83],
[84],
[85],
[86],
[87] and
[88]). SuperHero ●
👊 ●
★
09:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Not that much vandalism after the protection expired. Please relist if it picks up.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Cow cleaner 5000 vandal has returned. Has been vandalizing the article with false claims and fake sources for 2 years. —
Farix (
t |
c)
10:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This is very low-level. The article sees no edits for months at a time.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Too many enemies.
Prof TPMS (
talk)
11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Question: You are sure you want it fully protected? Even you couldn't edit it then....
Lectonar (
talk)
12:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined If you want it semiprotected, just ping me.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated additions by anonymous editors who want to turn this biographical article into a resume.
EncyclopediaUpdaticus (
talk)
12:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Seems to have stopped after your warning.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
19:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection - Vandalism by unsigned users.
Parsley Man (
talk)
23:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: 236 transclusion(s) found.
RezonansowyakaRezy (
talk |
contribs)
00:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I am not convinced, but would welcome more opinions.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a
high-risk template.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Some editors keep adding
Harrison Ford as
Han Solo to the page. They should know that Han Solo was killed by
Kylo Ren in
Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
AdamDeanHall (
talk)
14:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: One of the sources on the page says that "...the entire cast will return....". Just as a note....
Lectonar (
talk)
14:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Indefinite semi-protection: An editor had just added
Harrison Ford as
Han Solo to the infobox section of the page and I had to delete it...again. That's why I am requesting an indefinite semi-protection of the
Star Wars Episode VIII page.
AdamDeanHall (
talk)
23:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., so far no reasons for indefinite protection--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough IP disruption goes to this article on a daily basis. Administrators please check the history and the prot log, its time to indeff this one. . —
IB [
Poke ]
09:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected
Lectonar (
talk)
10:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only three days after the end of a three-week semi-protection, IP vandals are at it again. A minimum one-month semi-protection would be appreciated.
DPH1110 (
talk)
10:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: A user created a page named after themselves. After this content was redacted after an AfD discussion, a number of new users exhibiting similar behavior showed up and began removing maintenance tags and attempting to restore the older versions of the article. I suspect all of these are sockpuppets of the original author, but she seems to show no signs of slowing down. Adding some form of page protection to curb this behavior may be in order. Thank you for your attention. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
13:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending-changes protected for 3 months.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – One user was blocked for Spam the article has since moved in using IPs to add the same advertising to the article. Hopefully a short term semi will stop this behavior.
McMatter (
talk)/(
contrib)
00:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
07:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected I wouldn't call one act of vandalism to your user-page persistent, but here you go.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 1 month semi. There is some uncertainty about the release date of this film, with multiple sources being in apparent conflict. IP hoppers keep asserting their own POVs, in some cases using poor references like
this instead of the video's liner notes. This has been recurring since December 2015 or so, which is very odd for a film from 1987. You almost wonder if it's not a coordinated disruption, or if the attention to this old film is inspired by some meme or other form of groupthink. There's an open discussion on the talk page, yet none of the IPs have bothered to discuss. Some other examples of the changes:
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92] (a couple of these appear to be from IPs on the East Coast of the US, which might suggest coordination, or a single user.) Other disruptions:
[93]
[94] Thanks!.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
11:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
GAB
Hello!
21:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP Policy violations and vandalism.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
21:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
22:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by
User:TV5Ozamiz IP Sock.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
00:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Nearly a month has passed since protection expired, but there have been only two IP edits in that time; it's not yet to the point that protection would be good.
Nyttend (
talk)
03:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Musa
Talk
00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – There's an anonymous user who seems intent on making unsourced changes to this page. So far three different editors have reverted those changes, and two have left talk page messages with no response. A brief semi-protection seems in order.
Absconded Northerner (
talk)
09:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The warnings were the correct thing to do and the IP seems to have stopped. If this behaviour returns,
escalate the warning, e.g. to {{
uw-disruptive3}} or {{
uw-unsourced3}}. If the behaviour continues after that, report to
WP:ANI and the IP will probably get blocked. The incident is only worth reporting here if there are multiple IPs involved.
Yaris678 (
talk)
18:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might need protection for a short while. Someone keeps trying to remove sourced information.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
14:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The article needs work, actually. Protection will not help.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user insists on adding unencyclopedic content to this article. .
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
14:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Bahrain's cultural locations - requesting protection; people continuously keep removing Bahrain's heritage
semi-protection: persistent vandilism - bahrain's cultural heritage is being vandalised — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bh.alnasser (
talk •
contribs)
13:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done regarding
Sar, Bahrain because the page has been blanked pending copyright investigation.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done regarding
Jid Ali; issued a final warning about vandalism and edit warring to the requesting party Bh.alnasser.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
02:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by user Off-shell, who keeps reverting this page to an incorrect version, claiming disputed origins of the drink, while citing a cookbook as a source. This is despite few members correcting the page.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. To the requesting user, please sign your requests. Also, please learn to tell the difference between vandalism and a content dispute, and please engage the other user at the talk page, where they started a discussion several months ago, with so far no response.
MelanieN (
talk)
16:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from problematic IP-hopping editor. Editor keeps changing "person of color" to "black man/black woman", and registered editors apparently have a huge problem with that.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
04:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by MusikAnimal for 48 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
20:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism, relating to the claims made by Ke$ha against
Dr Luke. Dr Luke's page has been protected, so it seems the vandals have moved on to his employer.
Marianna251
TALK
18:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also for
Sony. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the floodgates opened, so did the vandalism!.
My name isnotdave (
talk/
contribs)
19:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Lectonar (
talk)
20:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
14:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quit blindly reverting each other and start discussing.
Katie
talk
18:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Continuing disruption and sock puppetry.
Widr (
talk)
17:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by shifting ips.
John from Idegon (
talk)
17:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
CFCF
💌
📧
17:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
18:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP users. .
Calidum
¤
02:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Edit warring.
TomCat4680 (
talk)
07:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
17:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓
Hello
71
18:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A user is changing IP addresses, and has continued to disrupt the article after the previous protection expired.
JohnMcButts (
talk)
18:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from multiple IPs about "face fetishism".
McGeddon (
talk)
19:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per request of another editor; request for indefinite protection
Reason: Constant, persistent vandalism.
Boomer Vial
Holla
19:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since I see lots of constructive editing by IPs, I do not think indefinite protection is appropriate or necessary.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revolving IP vandals/sockpuppets. Recently left a message for one admin in the edit comments.
Krj373*
(talk), *
(contrib)
21:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going, heavy
disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors.
livelikemusic
talk!
02:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Even though I've suggested that the matter be discussed on the talk page, an IP editor keeps reverting the article to a version that I and another user have been trying to improve. There is already a discussion about the issues on the talk page, but this has been ignored by the IP editor(s).
Dodi 8238 (
talk)
10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
14:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over the last few weeks.
Straykat99 (
talk)
00:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempt to remove plot details on the bases that they are spoilers in violation of
WP:SPOILER. —
Farix (
t |
c)
01:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and Persistent disruptive editing.
Donnowin1 (
talk)
18:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Lectonar for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Yobol (
talk)
20:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and long-term socking.
Exempted (
talk)
04:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
12:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Permanent Semi-protection: Recurring promotional attempts and blanking by IP editors such as
Special:Contributions/2601:18D:101:351B:790E:4DD4:BFD0:86F8; The potential seems to stay permanently due to the type of the article that makes it an obvious target for spamming and the vandalism is probably a reaction of the editors whose promotional/non-compliant edits have been undone.
Yuwash (
talk)
03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
07:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temorary Semi-protection: I hate to ask it, but there are numerous unconfirmed accounts trolling the page.
Meters (
talk)
05:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Can't say we didn't try.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: There are two athletes with the page (
Brandon Brown (racing driver) and
Brandon Brown (basketball born 1985)), and I feel like it'd make sense for there to be a disambiguation page at its place.
Zappa
24
Mati
04:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotected
Lectonar (
talk)
07:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, multiple accounts, apparent socks.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
03:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Seems to have stopped for now. If it resumes after this weekend's game, let us know.
Katie
talk
01:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Editor constantly removes most of the list of reccuring cast members of Vikings (season 4), stating that "the episodes are not sources for the cast list", even though the whole cast appeard and were listed in the end credits of the episode.
Rey Keshe (
talk)
14:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined I've formally warned you against violating 3RR for this article though you've already done your fourth revert. If you had been warned, I would have blocked you. Stop it.
Katie
talk
01:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Low-level vandalism, even when editing is infrequent.
George Ho (
talk)
21:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
SarahSV
(talk)
01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Elizium23 (
talk)
04:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The disruption is being caused by autoconfirmed accounts. Semi-protection won't help. Sorry.
Katie
talk
01:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptively edited by multiple IP's.
Musa
Talk
06:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
17:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unsigned users.
Parsley Man (
talk)
20:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Only one IP edited the article in last 48 hours, and he's blocked.
Katie
talk
01:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Regular vandalism. Increase in vandalism highly likely in view of today's reports of police investigation.
Boscaswell
talk
21:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. I see only one disruptive IP in the last 24 hours. If it gets rowdy, let us know. :-)
Katie
talk
00:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same edit war as
Catalonia.
Elizium23 (
talk)
21:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. No edits today.
Katie
talk
00:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked 2605:E000:2340:400::/64 - this is one person, but with IPv6 addresses you have to rangeblock to stop his disruption.
Katie
talk
00:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Article was full protected last week; since coming off of that there has been nonstop vandalism, unexplained blankings and sockpuppetry.
LM2000 (
talk)
22:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
Exempted (
talk)
02:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Euryalus (
talk)
04:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to article. -
Liance
talk/
contribs
00:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting for protection per talk page request; persistent non-NPOV/vandalism edits.
Boomer Vial
Holla
12:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit warring over the release date of a film.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
14:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
01:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: For two or three days now, some evidently related anon IPs have been making non-constructive and apparently needling edits to this article for what seems like themselves having fun. --
Tenebrae (
talk)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
01:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Baby
miss
fortune
06:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going
disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors by way of adding in
original research that either contradicts
reliably sourced content within article or that cannot be
verified.
livelikemusic
talk!
16:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content.
Favre1fan93 (
talk)
21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected
Lectonar (
talk)
17:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Edit Warring,Reverts done by IP users possibly IP hopping,
Versatile29 (
talk)
10:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Content dispute/edit warring – Similar edit-war than
Catalonia and the
Basque Country. —
Jɑuмe (
dis-me)
19:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Why was it denied? And why Catalonia has full protection and has kept a wrong version? Also isn't it possible our articles have semi-protection status due to constant IP vandalism? —
Jɑuмe (
dis-me)
20:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Please note: a response from the bottom is not a decline in itself. As for
Catalonia, please check with the protecting admin, and be aware that they may have protected the
WP:Wrong version. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
03:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined There hasn't been an IP edit to this article since February 14.
Katie
talk
13:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's already PC protected but I think it needs to be semi protected as IPs out there constantly experiment with and vandalize the article.
Frankie
talk
07:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Not enough IP disruption to justify semi-protection.
Katie
talk
13:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 07:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
13:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly hit by selfpromoting socks; see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte.
Thomas.W
talk
15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
JamesBWatson.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: The article was just placed on Wikipedia's mainpage and has since been bombarded with vandalism and non-constructive editing.
Dark
Knight
2149
16:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weight being changed to 198 even though NFL.com says 181.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
17:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Mainly edited by IP addresses. Pending changes will help so a reviewer can review the edits first.
Baby
miss
fortune
06:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively.
Katie
talk
13:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
04:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
12:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive activity keeps reoccurring despite declined RfPP requests.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
04:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
05:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of drive by anon IP vandalism lately. .
Montanabw
(talk)
05:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content by numerous IP's.
Exempted (
talk)
06:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spurt of edits changing the birth and death dates.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
16:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
13:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Nohomersryan (
talk)
04:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this article is not for advirtisement..lots of newbies coming here and trolling.
Ishwar
⊕
⊗
05:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 06:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined No vandalism on your userpage.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – xyz.
LoudLizard (
📞 |
contribs |
✉)
14:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
LoudLizard:, is this a test?
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5). Tbhotch:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Tbhotch: Yes, sorry.
LoudLizard (
📞 |
contribs |
✉)
00:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn by requestor
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – never thought this would be happening, but my user and talk pages have both been the targets of vandalism recently. Both have also been protected recently.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
11:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User page protected for a bit longer. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
11:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Wikipedia:Reference Desk subpages
- Request unprotection of
WP:RD/H,
WP:RD/M, as per suggestion at RFC here
[95]. Have discussed this several times with protecting admin, who persists in protecting, against wishes of other admins and emerging consensus at reference desk talk page.
SemanticMantis (
talk)
19:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I went to the reference desk and wanted to ask a question. I discovered when I tried that it was protected, but there was a message there, a workaround that I could "submit an edit request". However, when I clicked on that it brought me to the talk page which is ALSO PROTECTED. That means that the very message providing a workaround for the protection of the reference desk leads you down the garden path to a "solution" that is foiled by the same mechanism. So I am asking for at least the talk page to be unprotected.
67.244.114.239 (
talk)
21:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: RD/M's protection recently expired and was protected again because the disruptive sockpuppeting resumed a few hours after. The resolution to this probably won't be found here though and we can't use this place as a temporary holding pen for questions for the protected desks.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined This will not be resolved via unprotection requests.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes and vandalism by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
03:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes and vandalism by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
03:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Vandalism from IP address users since Thursday night. If this is not an option right now, is there another option that works? I am not looking to block everyone from editing the page, but due to recent events and multiple reverts, I think it's safe to at least do something.
Mandoli (
talk)
23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism
Taffe316 (
talk)
01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or extend pending changes; none of this month's edits by IPs were good.
George Ho (
talk)
21:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This will only get worse, when editors want to add team that has not secured qualification.
Qed237
(talk)
22:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal/section-blanker.
B. Mastino (
talk)
21:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
It's all lies I just have a dynamic IP and I am not a vandal
124.195.206.13 (
talk)
21:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced POV editing by IP users, dates back to December 2015. All IP edits since around then have been non-constrictive, or reverting this material. --
The Voidwalker
Discuss
02:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
09:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: - repeated addition of multiple
Dhuri-related hoax entries by new likely sock accounts and IPs. Created hoax-articles have been removed, verified sock accounts blocked (
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravikiran singh).
GermanJoe (
talk)
08:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Nairspecht (
talk)
09:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same edit-war as
Catalonia.
Elizium23 (
talk)
21:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I suggest to use "indefinite semi-protection" instead —
Jɑuмe (
dis-me)
20:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP hopper making nonconstructive edits.
Crboyer (
talk)
01:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by HJ Mitchell for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism-- About 20 times today. The last is the anon trying to avoid being caught by reverting itself, but continuing with the game.
Caballero/Historiador
⎌
03:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Anons have continued to vanadalized this article twice since I have posted for protection here. --
Caballero/Historiador
⎌
04:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Golbez for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
07:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – User AlexTheWhovian constantly reverts edits made by me on other users, refusing to acknowledge the Tv show Vikings as a source for the show itself. Please put a protection against those disruptive editings. Thanks.
Rey Keshe (
talk)
08:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Pending changes is for nonautoconfirmed editors.
Katie
talk
17:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long string of edits made against consensus by different IPs (same editor), and other disruptive edits.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP editors vandalism. --
Djadjko (
talk)
21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping vandalism.
☾Loriendrew☽
☏(ring-ring)
22:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked 209.9.128.40/29, please re-report if the vandal escapes this range.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – User AlexTheWhovian constantly reverts edits made by me on other users, refusing to acknowledge the Tv show Vikings as a source for the show itself. Please put a protection against those disruptive editings. Thanks.
Rey Keshe (
talk)
08:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Pending changes is for nonautoconfirmed editors.
Katie
talk
17:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long string of edits made against consensus by different IPs (same editor), and other disruptive edits.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP editors vandalism. --
Djadjko (
talk)
21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping vandalism.
☾Loriendrew☽
☏(ring-ring)
22:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked 209.9.128.40/29, please re-report if the vandal escapes this range.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: My user page has been vandalised numerous times.
Ches
(talk)
19:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
20:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There have been three page moves by
Dyolf~enwiki, all of which have been reverted by
Bondegezou.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk)
19:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Move protected
Katie
talk
20:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temp (long) semi - Reoccurence of persistent vandalism.
BMK (
talk)
20:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., must be reprotected if vandalism resumes after three days--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: This article is prone and has undergone many edit wars and disputes, some of which have caused by
User:Laurentiu_Popa and others by
User:Twofortnights. That is why I believe semi-protection is the better course of action to ameliorate such issues. (may even prevent further edit warring)
Whatshouldichoose (
talk)
14:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The only "wars and disputes" were created by
User talk:Whatshouldichoose who keeps changing this page to a less informational one, despite the rest of the users who watch this page keep on reverting his changes.
Laurentiu Popa (
talk)
14:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, the only one is YOU. YOU'RE the one who is so uptight about this. So am I, but none of the rest of the users watching the page are.
User:Twofortnights agrees that the content should be fitting but that this format is better. Please stop acting like you serve every other user watching this page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Whatshouldichoose (
talk •
contribs)
15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: A previous block and rangeblock have not stopped a persistent IPv6 vandal from
continuing to edit-war on this page, as he/she has been doing over the course of several months. -
Kudzu1 (
talk)
18:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – No evidence that this person exists, and each instance of the article has been a nonsensical mash-up of unrelated pieces of content.
—Largo Plazo (
talk)
18:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected
Lectonar (
talk)
19:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – We had protection before, and then it expired and IPs kept changing his birth place, if we could get protection back that would be great.
Dbrodbeck (
talk)
03:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
13:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Slow motion edit war by dynamic IPs over the past ten days, likely connected to a
current SPI.
Laszlo Panaflex (
talk)
16:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – After an attempt to discuss the issue on the
user's talk page and an
ANEW discussion that came to nothing, various IP editors have continued to make unhelpful edits to the article.
.
My name isnotdave (
talk/
contribs)
16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
17:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please salt.
General Ization
Talk
17:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected indefinitely.
General Ization, this title is obviously an attempt to get round the creation protection of
Rapper Rony (Musician) from November. I expect other variants will turn up, please keep an eye out.
Bishonen |
talk
17:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still target of
1 chisper (
talk ·
contribs) socks adding bogus cast.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
03:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done - pending changes protected by
MelanieN. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Wow, Coffee, you are fast! 0;-D My comment: At the time of the previous (declined) request, PC protection was still in place. Since then it has expired and vandalism has resumed. The PC protection seems to have worked pretty well during the three months it was in place, so I restored it for a year.
MelanieN (
talk)
16:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism since his mention in Rick and Morty.
Joeykai (
talk)
04:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced material by dynamic IPs.
. SummerPhD
v2.0
15:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated varied-IP edits from long-term "selfie shoe" vandal
User:Borcker, over the past few days.
McGeddon (
talk)
15:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Shifting IP (likely
User:Borcker) repeatedly adding "tattoos" and "heterosexuality" to the list of common taboos.
McGeddon (
talk)
15:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article had been semi-protected until April, but this somehow fell off during a page move a few hours ago (an IP has just vandalised it) - possibly an error in
User:NinjaRobotPirate "moving protection settings" from an unprotected article to this one?.
McGeddon (
talk)
16:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yeah, could have been. I corrected a disruptive page move by an autoconfirmed user, and the page seems to have subsequently lost its protection. I wouldn't be surprised if that were the intention.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 05:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined
Lectonar (
talk)
11:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: The article has been subject to vandalism by
Bertrand101's IP socks within this month.
Sixth o
f March
09:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs to claim there are 207 National Olympic Committees in spite of multiple warnings and even an in-text hidden note explaining that there are, in fact, 206 NOCs and they should not change that.
Smartyllama (
talk)
13:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continual and sustained attempts to add poorly sourced
WP:OR uncovering birth year and other family details. This is either one editor with a roving IP or several. Sustained discussion and explanation has taken place on Talk page to explain why these BLP violations are out of order.
Sionk (
talk)
18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This is very low-level.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
15:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user who has contributed repeatedly seems to think he is entitled to censor the article. Another user is reverting without an intelligent summary or reason.
SammuleRobberts (
talk)
02:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- An IP and this editor have been edit warring the editor reverting without an intelligent summary or reason is probably me, evidently
WP:RS is neither.If this is the IP he's past 3rr.
Doug Weller
talk
06:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Seems to have died down...relist if this picks up, although protection is not the the right venue. Do edit summaries have to be intelligent?
Lectonar (
talk)
12:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving...
Lectonar (
talk)
15:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has recommenced after short semi-protection.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Article is again a vandalism magnet, we should try pending changes over complete IP block. As he's a young musician which seems to attract samge age vandals the duration should be for the whole year.
Denniss (
talk)
08:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
10:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., disruptive edits are infrequent--
Ymblanter (
talk)
12:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could I have a brief semiprotection of my user talk page, please? An ip hopping block evader is disrupting it regularly, and although it's a moment's work to revert the vandalism every time it is getting tedious.
bonadea
contributions
talk
11:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you need more or less please ping me.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been vandalized several times; "Married to Alex Morgan" has been added to the honors section and reverted twenty-four times since August 2015.
Joeykai (
talk)
02:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
KH-1 (
talk)
02:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of content that is against the subject by some IP and newly-registered users.
Sixth o
f March
02:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. ~~
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – The IP keep adding unsourced BLP info where the date of birth is not sourced or possibly a hoax? Your thoughts.
Britty192 (
talk)
04:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Still the same reason why it should be protected:
Bertrand101. Please make it longer than three months.
Sixth o
f March
05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
08:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: Merge
Bilal Saeed (singer) this article.
Musa
Talk
03:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done I've moved the page.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
08:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unprotection: I think the sockpuppets not going to vandalise or eased down to negative levels the article again because its is the right time to unprotected the article. It clear.
Britty192 (
talk)
05:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I doubt it,
see the logs. This article has been under constant attack for years, no reason to think it's just going to stop after a few months of protection and the vandalism eased down to nothing because of the protection.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- That's alright because i might give anyone to edit Woody Paige article again to not for IP Addresses or New Users. Full protection is being isolated from any English Wikipedia article and only full protected article on the English Wikipedia. Not fair it has been vandlaised even if admin has stored semi protection so many times but nothing has changed.
Britty192 (
talk)
07:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Full protection is needed because that specific vandal used autoconfirmed accounts to get around the semi-protection. Drop it down to semi-protection and you'd just see the same thing again.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – A POV-pushing editor has repeatedly inserted the same crap, twice sourced to an unreliable blog and once unsourced, to this BLP. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
05:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The user has been warned sufficiently that they should be blocked if they do it again.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting brief (31 hours or so) protection on article to foster discussion. IP hopping editor at 112.134.* keeps adding unsourced content without participating in open discussion. Content is further problematic because it's unclear what
"Extra Fighter" means. Sounds non-noteworthy, but without discussion, who knows?.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
22:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
- Oh crap. I must've launched the Twinkle request from the talk page instead of from the article. I messed up.
Bishonen, I'll withdraw this and resubmit my request for the main article.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn by requestor
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Actually, I won't re-request, since Bish was kind enough to protect. My brain not working.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I see no reason to continue allowing anonymous and new users to edit my page.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
02:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
03:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Repeated vandalism by two IPs and one user; Requesting brief protection (e.g. 48 hours) because vandals come from
this thread about J. Olson on reddit; it should calm down tomorrow or the day after.
Okhjon (
talk)
23:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of same pattern of behavior that lead to the page's previous protections.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – So many reverts this month.
George Ho (
talk)
01:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
01:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2602:306:3357:BA0:148E:C83F:DA5B:B0BD (
talk)
01:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Numerous IPs (and some registered users) repeatedly vandalizing page. Almost all of these edits have been described by the vandals as "fixed typo" or "typo" in their edit summaries - so this is possibly a coordinated activism campaign of some kind, though I'm no detective. The topic of the page is someone involved in an extremely heated controversy that may be protracted for several months, so long-term protection may be required.
BaseballPie (
talk)
01:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
02:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
DestinationAlan (
talk)
14:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent modification of links, likely related to block evasion
[98].
Jetstreamer
Talk
17:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Edit-warring IPs.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
19:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Very slow edit-warring...
Lectonar (
talk)
19:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
16:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
21:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Long-term semi-protection: A long-term vandal consistently using new sockpuppets frequently targets this article for vandalism. It just became unprotected after six months and was immediately vandalized on the first day of non-protection.
ElKevbo (
talk)
17:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
22:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Caste pages are always magnets for POV-pushing, but this article is particularly tiresome because there are prominent caste historians that have published dubious information. I am requesting indefinite semi-protection due to persistent POV editing (deletion of sourced content, addition of unsourced/poorly-sourced content).
Kautilya3 (
talk)
18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bishonen |
talk
22:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: IP comment blanking has resumed after the previous protection expired.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
22:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Stanprog..if you want it unprotected, just ping me please.
Lectonar (
talk)
22:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - replacing "person of color" with "black woman", courtesy of a problematic IP-hopping editor - resumed almost immediately after protection expired.
Electric
Burst(
Electron firings)(
Zaps)
14:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Wikipedia is not censored.
Niggaz With Attitude didn't have a problem with "blacks" (well, maybe they did with specific ones, but still...), why would anyone else?
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
15:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Favre1fan93 (
talk)
19:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
19:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent fringe promotion and edit warring through socking for many years. The article was recently semi-protected for a month but the behaviour resumed immediately after the semi-protection expired.
Krakkos (
talk)
17:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected
Lectonar (
talk)
19:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP and new users, possible the same user/socks?.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
18:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of recent vandalism from new and IP editors.
Drm310 (
talk)
18:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – John Cena trolls are back. IP and new account adding him to this page.
Majora (
talk)
04:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
17:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – has been protected recently, but the vandalism has continued.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
11:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
XFusionSGX (
talk)
13:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP users.
Vipinhari ||
talk
17:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: Page -
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=%EF%BB%BF&redirect=no
Vipinhari ||
talk
17:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Parade of multiple IP editors coming in to remove a link to a music label in contravention of
WP:REDLINK. Editors come in, remove the linking around the not yet created article page. CC
Ghmyrtle as the admin who has reverted and blocked several of the IPs.
Hasteur (
talk)
17:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'm not an admin, thankfully. All the redlink removals have been done by a single IP editor, who has been blocked multiple times in recent weeks for removing redlinks on numerous articles, and who keeps re-emerging under new identities. I'm making at least daily reports to
WP:AI/V, but so far the problem has not yet been finally resolved. Protecting this page is a good idea, nevertheless.
Ghmyrtle (
talk)
18:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted 6 times.
Boleyn (
talk)
18:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected
Lectonar (
talk)
19:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prominent help page, getting overwritten by test edits and so on.
John of Reading (
talk)
10:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
15:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a target of the Ref Desk Troll, has created multiple accounts to vandalize page.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
15:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Jayron32.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
16:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ref Desk Troll is starting to move to this page.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
16:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Jayron32.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
16:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
20:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The problems are created by one user, who did not edit after the last warning. Let us wait.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous erroneous edits per last few hours of edits.
FFM784 (
talk)
02:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Clarinetguy097 (
talk)
04:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks by IPs and new accounts portraying her as "married" to same-sex K-pop artists. .
Dr.
K.
05:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been removing information without explanation.
T.C.Haliburton
talk nerdy to me
05:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Sherick (
talk)
03:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – continuation of edit war.
Mdann52 (
talk)
07:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
07:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
07:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full-protection: Continuing edit-warring and vandalism.
82.132.233.167 (
talk)
20:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
00:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Nikhilmn2002 (
talk)
02:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Long term vandalism, this page may need a months plus worth of protection. History is here:
[99]. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
03:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death vandal.
Karst (
talk)
08:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection.
Macedonian, a Greek (
talk)
18:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: For two days, anon IPs have been making non-constructive edits, including removal of citation requests, adding duplicate information, and horrendous grammar and prose, and they appear very insistent. --
Tenebrae (
talk)
22:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: For two days, anon IPs have been adding non-constructive edits, and persistent and unjustified removal of tags.
Caballero/Historiador
⎌
23:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article itself semiprotected for sockpuppeting, and socks have started to drift over here as well. .
Coretheapple (
talk)
17:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, I do not see a need for it, and a closing administrator should be qualified enough to discount votes of socks.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article needs a edit protect update. Constant reverts, thanks to anon IPs. Pending changes does not work.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
18:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Leaving PC protection in place until May.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
shield34 (
talk)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
04:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Floquenbeam.
Katie
talk
22:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – There's an IP-hopping anon editor, that keeps going against consensus. Repeated warnings accross these addresses have not worked. A temporary edit protection might make clear this is not how we do things on Wikipedia.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
18:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Davethorp (
talk)
20:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
22:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Major edit warring. See
WP:ANI#Things out of control.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
21:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: The amount of edit warring is ridiculous from all involved parties, but I must note that
Whatshouldichoose (who I believe started the bold, massive
WP:REMOVAL that led to the edit war) seems be be basically an
WP:SPA for this article.
LjL (
talk)
21:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
21:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: There are so many IPs and new users vandalizing his page, and I do not think it will ever stop.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Although editing is infrequent, the IP edits have been reverted. Current administrator very active, so I could give him a message, but I read the edit notice banner. He seems very busy nowadays, and he says that he has health issues. --
George Ho (
talk)
19:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Oops.
George Ho (
talk)
19:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC protection had actually not expired yet, but it seems to be necessary and working well, so I extended it for another month.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing recently. Hdjensofjfnen (
u |
t |
c)
21:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –
Dance Moms is the subject of periodic vandalism by a unresponsive, persistent IP hopping vandal who removes links, rearranges content, deliberately misspells words after they've been corrected, etc. He or she seems to have something against
Maddie Ziegler as that is the link he primarily keeps removing. The same editor is making similar edits at
Dance Moms (season 1),
Dance Moms (season 2),
Dance Moms (season 3),
Dance Moms (season 4),
Dance Moms (season 5) and
Dance Moms (season 6), so these all need protecting. All of these pages were last protected for two weeks at the end of January after a similar request that I made here,
[100] but the vandal has returned anyway.
AussieLegend (
✉)
05:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. 2601:248:4200:708A::/64 blocked one month for vandalism. If he returns under new IPs, let me know.
Katie
talk
15:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user violating
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Pakistan Super League and continuously adding false information. full protecting the article for 2 or 3 months will reduce the vandalism. . -
Anjana Larka
SEND WIKILOVE💗
10:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Anjana Larka: If the user attempts to evade the block, or any other editor starts to edit the page without consensus, please contact me at my talk page so that I can protect the page at that point. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Lapadite (
talk)
14:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The disruptive editor is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection won't help. Report them to
WP:AIV after an appropriate warning if he continues to blank content.
Katie
talk
15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –
Dance Moms is the subject of periodic vandalism by a unresponsive, persistent IP hopping vandal who removes links, rearranges content, deliberately misspells words after they've been corrected, etc. He or she seems to have something against
Maddie Ziegler as that is the link he primarily keeps removing. The same editor is making similar edits at
Dance Moms (season 1),
Dance Moms (season 2),
Dance Moms (season 3),
Dance Moms (season 4),
Dance Moms (season 5) and
Dance Moms (season 6), so these all need protecting. All of these pages were last protected for two weeks at the end of January after a similar request that I made here,
[101] but the vandal has returned anyway.
AussieLegend (
✉)
05:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. 2601:248:4200:708A::/64 blocked one month for vandalism. If he returns under new IPs, let me know.
Katie
talk
15:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user violating
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Pakistan Super League and continuously adding false information. full protecting the article for 2 or 3 months will reduce the vandalism. . -
Anjana Larka
SEND WIKILOVE💗
10:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Anjana Larka: If the user attempts to evade the block, or any other editor starts to edit the page without consensus, please contact me at my talk page so that I can protect the page at that point. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Lapadite (
talk)
14:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Consider
the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible
edit-warring by one or two users. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The disruptive editor is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection won't help. Report them to
WP:AIV after an appropriate warning if he continues to blank content.
Katie
talk
15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of
disruptive editing that provided the page's previous protections.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined That was just one IP; please warn them if it picks up, and report to
AIV.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent long-term vandalism by numerous IP's.
Rightdown (
talk)
03:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism.
Rightdown (
talk)
05:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Known sockleader targeting this article from multiple IPs.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
15:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For those unaware, this is
Fangusu.
Katie
talk
16:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One of a known sockleader's favourite targets to edit from multiple IPs. Has been going on for quite a long time.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
15:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked most recent Fangusu IP.
Katie
talk
16:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent sockpuppetry
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
16:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Katie
talk
16:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
KrakatoaKatie: Just saying, the history of the article is really just reverts.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
16:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low frequency of edits makes this a perfect candidate for PC.
Yaris678 (
talk)
17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – IP-hopping defacer.
LjL (
talk)
17:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection was applied by Smalljim, not me.
Yaris678 (
talk)
17:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Trolling.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
17:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've kept it short, as it counters the openness that characterizes the help-desks....but I think this is a problem that won't go away.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism where people keep putting different stuff for Best New Artist.
Musicpoplover12 (
talk)
04:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page has a long history of persistent vandalism to the film's plot from IPs.
Wikicontributor12 (
talk)
06:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: - repeated ongoing addition of hoax articles by socking user (4th or 5th incarnation by now). See also
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravikiran singh.
GermanJoe (
talk)
12:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
15:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.
The Masked Man of Mega Might (
talk)
12:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
15:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 2602:306:CF98:5EC0::/64 immediately resumed re-adding unreferenced, likely fake info to article after last 7-day protect expired. Attempts at communication ignored.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
14:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently someone with a US-based ISP address is continuously removing the section about the subject's conviction, which are sourced and reported in the media. The PP expired within the last 24 hours, and the same person is back at removing the information.
Cahk (
talk)
14:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: This is currently a hot topic within the USA, and is subject to a large amount of media attention. This should be semi-protected to prevent anonymous vandalism. .
TJH2018 (
talk)
22:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, so far we did not have a single instance of recent vandalism at that page. I would be happy to protect the page if vandalism starts.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Nairspecht (
talk)
05:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, block-evading vandal plaquing this article for weeks. Please protect article for at least 30 days to discourage the misbehavior and give the cleanup squad some rest. .
Hertz1888 (
talk)
14:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As the dispruptive editing is rather infrequent.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Bangladesh and Asian Ethnicities/Religions
Temporary semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism. Pursuant to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ifaz Ali Khan/Archive,
Religion in Bangladesh was semi-protected until 7 February, and 103.230.104.0/22 was anon-only blocked until 11 February. Beginning 12 February, vandalism resumed from 23 IPs in the range 103.230.104.1 - 103.230.107.16, to the above articles (listed in order of most in need of protection to least in need of protection, if there is reluctance to protect them all). As with the earlier sockpuppets, the edits insert unsourced dubious information about other Asian ethnicities or religions into articles about Bangladesh and vice versa. Alternative ideas about how to deal with this are welcome.
Worldbruce (
talk)
07:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Question: Could someone who knows how to rangeblock look at this please? The edit frequency is quite low, so I would'nt protect if I dont have to.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done. I have range blocked 103.230.104.0 to 103.230.111.255. I think that is the correct range. I have never range blocked before, but the instructions were pretty clear, so I think I've done it right. Let me know if there are any problems.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of the same type of
disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors by way of adding in
original research, which is what provided the page's previous protections.
livelikemusic
talk!
01:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP edit war continuing over 12 days.
Accurizer (
talk)
12:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Next time, do not wait for 12 days.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
13:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war ongoing. Please protect for at LEAST 10 days so that a compromise can be reached. .
FreeatlastChitchat (
talk)
10:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: I don't see that much activity on the page..the edit-warring is very slow. If all parties continue to refrain from reverting back and forth, i just do not see the need for full protection right now. Other opinions welcome.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lectonar:, the edit-warring intensified yesterday, so that I think we cn fully protect the article for three days. It will not solve the main problem though.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed it won't. Partaking parties are invited to use the talk-page.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Drive by IPs do little except vandalize.
Montanabw
(talk)
07:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
Keri (
talk)
11:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Add: The vio being inserted is of such a serious nature that it requires oversighting (see page history for examples); simply reverting is not a feasible solution.
Keri (
talk)
12:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qpalzmmzlapq |
talk |
contribs
01:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
DMacks (
talk)
08:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism
Winterysteppe (
talk)
05:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- These edits are being made at about 10 per minute right now.
Meters (
talk)
05:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
@
Meters: The page seems to be protected now.
Rightdown (
talk)
05:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Yup, thanks.
Meters (
talk)
05:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Absolutely massive IP vandalism spree. The page is such a mess that even ClueBot is reverting to a vandalized version of the page.
Half
Shadow
06:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
DMacks (
talk)
08:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against
WP:ARBPIA3.
86.153.74.179 (
talk)
21:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- In spite of this;
[102]
[103]
[104]
[105].
86.153.74.179 (
talk)
21:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The users involved in the disruption have all been blocked. Therefore, there is no need to protect the page at this time. We do appreciate your notifications though, and I will definitely act immediately on any further editors that disrupt these articles. If you have any further concerns feel free to contact me at my talk page. Thank you, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to undergo a lot of vandalism and/or useless edits. Hdjensofjfnen (
talk|
contribs)
00:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - around one incident every couple weeks or so - just revert it.
Alexius
Horatius
01:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a BLP.
St
Anselm (
talk)
01:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
06:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against
WP:ARBPIA3.
86.153.74.179 (
talk)
21:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. per
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
21:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
DemocraticLuntz (
talk)
02:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Likely one editor abusing multiple accounts. (Although none of the vandal accounts are currently blocked).
Rightdown (
talk)
02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
02:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – His team lost a high level game today and he conceded a penalty so some angry "fans".
Qed237
(talk)
22:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of anon vandalism due to club being in financial difficulty .
JMHamo (
talk)
23:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – None of IP edits were good. Alternatively, renew pending changes.
George Ho (
talk)
23:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Unconfirmed reports that he has signed a contract with the Baltimore Orioles - awaiting official team confirmation.
Trut-h-urts man (
T •
C)
23:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
01:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by IPs not allowed to edit here under
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30.
RolandR (
talk)
00:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected. by another admin for one month.
Alexius
Horatius
01:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against
WP:ARBPIA3.
86.153.74.179 (
talk)
00:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Alexius
Horatius
01:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being repeatedly vandalised.
LoudLizard (
📞 |
contribs |
✉)
18:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (
talk)
19:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ, please acquaint yourself with our
protection policy.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, I will even though I have many times already, thank you for your service @
Lectonar:
Review of protection: I was asked by
ChristophThomas to lift the indefinite semiprotection placed on this article in 2009. I am not active enough to make a decision either way, and so I leave the request here for other views. For my part, I think it unwise to remove it in light of the protection history in 2008 leading up to the indef and the talk page now. ÷
seresin
21:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not unprotected I think based on the edit requests and other nonsense on the talk page and its archives, that unprotection would be an extraordinarily bad idea.
Katie
talk
22:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- the only thing that is nonsense is to leave an article for over 6 years straight semi-protected. None of the talk page entries qualifies as vandalism attempts --
ChristopheT (
talk)
01:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'm still standing by this protection and I don't think anything has materially changed since I originally protected the article. While I agree this article might not be a vandalism magnet for eternity, it absolutely will remain one while 4chan and Anonymous are internet phenomenons. Indefinite protections are the status quo on 4chan related articles, for example:
4chan and
Christopher Poole . While I agree indefinite protections are not a best practice, I believe these are common sense. If you want to argue that all article in this "category" should be unprotected, I invite you to take this to a broader audience.
Brandon (
talk)
02:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- no disrespect but I expect admins to administrate - which in this case means apply the rules we have in place. Now rules says we remove protection from time to time - 6 years is not a bad time to do just that (unless of course you think it is too much work to un protect the page and protect it later if the page is the target of vandalism) --
ChristopheT (
talk)
02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Brandon...what do you thing about pending changes protection for some time to see how much vandalism comes in at all.
Lectonar (
talk)
07:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
ChristophThomas: The decision not to take action can be an administrative action (a rabbit hole some of us have recently explored with bitter tears and great anguish). We've been trusted to use our judgment. There are some pages that are indefinitely protected to prevent long-term disruption, and I agree with
Brandon that this article is one of those. If someone disagrees, they're welcome to unprotect it. I wouldn't suggest pending changes only because I think the edit rate will be too high once the vandalism gets going, and it will be too much for the reviewers.
Katie
talk
15:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The edit rate was another thing I wanted to see, actually.
Lectonar (
talk)
15:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- why speculating when a few mouse clicks will simply tell us if it is true or not ? seriously - how much time does it take to un-protect a page and protect it if "edit rate will be too high once the vandalism gets going". 3.5 min times 2 ? so - that is a little over a minute per year for this particular article - which seems to be a rather fair effort to provide to find out if the protection level the last few years was actually justified --
ChristopheT (
talk)
15:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Because you don't need to drop a hammer on your foot to know it'll hurt.
tutterMouse (
talk)
18:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not done Definitely backing Katie and Brandon up here... this is a page that needs permenant semi-protection. There is no net positive to unprotecting the article (much akin to
4chan), and there is no net positive to continuing this conversation here. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
19:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
09:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Continuous edit war done by IP user after expiry of the IP block.
ApprenticeFan
work
13:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Frequent and persistent vandalism.
MartinezMD (
talk)
16:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Far from every ip-edit is vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is facing persistent vandalism from IP users.
Vinegarymass911 (
talk)
17:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Every vandalism, and there are sometimes days between the surges, was by a single, albeit different user. These can be warned off and blocked instead of protecting the page.
Lectonar (
talk)
19:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of recent vandalism from new and IP editors.
2607:FB90:A43A:7565:0:2D:EBB8:9A01 (
talk)
19:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing this article. ~
Rob
Talk
20:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
20:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive edits. Previous semi-protection was for 3 months.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Last protection was in 2014. The IP-user is just one edit away from a block.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The IP was already blocked by the time you left that comment.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Vandalism, including editing to say the party is "Right wing populist." This party is left-wing.
Dragonrider17 (
talk)
17:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP playing around, I'd say two people on one computer, reverting each other.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Just one edit reverted this month. Other than that, no other edits since semi-protection expired. --
George Ho (
talk)
19:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism edits have been very rare; however, since those edits are BLP violations, I am extending the PC protection for another 3 months.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: There have been persistent edits trying to focus on exploitative information, not a neutral point of view, and diminishing the significant contributions to her current industry. Looking for protection so that only page admins can make edits as to protect the biographies of living persons who have had a recent high level of media interest.
108.210.71.93 (
talk)
16:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: There isn't such a permission as "page admin". I don't think protection is necessary, as it seems to be only one IP editor trying to write a new version of the biography. Discussion will be more useful.
Der
yck C.
16:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Agree...if necessary, consider dispute-resolution.
Lectonar (
talk)
16:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long-term disruptive editing by a user that seems to not want to discuss the content issue at hand.
My name isnotdave (
talk/
contribs)
16:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Question: This is a content dispute. As such, I'll consider short-term full protection to persuade a discussion, but won't apply semi.
Der
yck C.
16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, sure thanks.
My name isnotdave (
talk/
contribs)
16:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Ah not an issue anymore --
User(s)
blocked. by
MusikAnimal.
My name isnotdave (
talk/
contribs)
16:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
20:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism.
ukexpat (
talk)
20:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Yamaguchi先生. (semi) —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Requesting immediate archiving... as bot will complain —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistant sockpuppetry.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected – 1 month.
EdJohnston (
talk)
19:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Besides the fact that the sockmaster has been constantly responding on this page throughout its history by using IPs, no report or statement on this page has been made by an IP that Fangusu did not use themselves. This editor has a socking history with IPs that goes back almost 8 years, and the current period of consecutive time doing so is now 6 months. Also, see
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Fangusu - indefinite talk protection request for more related info.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
19:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
20:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been ongoing since approximately 2 hours since the last semiprotection expired, right up to today, but there's been a serious increase in the last week or so. The last time an IP made an edit to this article that was not clearly vandalism was Feb. 5, before that Jan. 2, and then I got back as far as last August before I gave up looking for another one.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
20:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
20:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP hopping and vandalism.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Jayron32.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
Katanin (
talk)
18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user and sock continue to vandalize page.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
18:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 06:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the first two.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. for the last one.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Binksternet (
talk)
17:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a forthnight now.
Lectonar (
talk)
17:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a target of the "Blue Undigo" vandal.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
18:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the newest incarnation has been blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
18:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection (until at least mid-March, please). Introduction of personal opinion and unsourced/poorly sourced negative content. When the school's OFSTED report is published in March it will be a reliable source, but we don't have one yet.
Laura Jamieson (talk)
12:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Although it's (just about) manageable at the moment, it's likely to continue while Adam Johnson's trial for child sex offences is front page news. Requesting page protection before it gets worse.
Marianna251
TALK
12:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
14:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of a lot of vandalism as it is a nation and club ranking. IP's and new accounts wants to put their nation and club first in the lists and make unsourced changes. Given the history I think indef semi is the best, because on matchdays it is too much activity for pending changes.
Qed237
(talk)
15:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection, again: Persistent vandalism, introduction of unsourced content.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
21:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. A large number of IPs have vandalized the page recently, including one persistent vandal who keeps trying to pretend the series aired on British preschool channel CBeebies. Many other IPs tend to add false info to the already extremely-lengthy plot section, and since the page is somewhat of a mess anyway, I feel semi-protection would be best on the page.
108.20.47.212 (
talk)
22:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, by which is mainly long-term vandalism.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
04:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
09:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
21:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations.
GAB
Hello!
21:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent removal of the "Sexuality" section in the article by anonymous users without explanation.
Havok
(T/
c/
e)
21:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Widr (
talk)
22:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
DemocraticLuntz (
talk)
00:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and IP vandalism.
172.56.39.187 (
talk)
01:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Same family of IPv6 users (2600:1006:b1xx:*) at it again in this article, like before the article was last semi-protected, persistently introducing false info. IP users in the recent history have same prefix, but quite likely the same person.
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
01:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
06:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted 3x in 13 months.
Boleyn (
talk)
06:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected indefinitely.
Alexius
Horatius
06:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent run of IP vandalism.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scored a goal against Manchester United and therefore has attracted much vandalism. Requesting protection for 2 weeks.
Shreerajtheauthor (
talk)
18:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
20:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by an IP address and a new user.
CLCStudent (
talk)
18:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Just two users....semiprotection would be overkill
Lectonar (
talk)
20:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Recently undergone quite a bit of disruptive editing. Hdjensofjfnen (
u |
t |
c)
21:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--
EclecticEnnui (
talk)
22:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already done.
BethNaught (
talk)
22:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three socks within the last week.
GAB
Hello!
20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Advertisement recreated three times in two weeks. —
swpb
T
20:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Apparent sock-puppet has resumed inserting copyvio material.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
20:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the course of several months.
Legitimus (
talk)
19:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.
Serols (
talk)
19:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor apparently from the congregation has been vandalizing the article. Maybe give it a month? Thanks.
Jytdog (
talk)
20:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk)
22:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
02:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined User was blocked by
JamesBWatson
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
02:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined User was blocked by
JamesBWatson
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Link is currently featured on "in the news". Semi-protection until it is no longer a current event requested.
8.14.172.48 (
talk)
13:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined IPs are also making good faith edits such as
this, which semi-protection would prevent.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violates and persistent vandalism since I noticed earlier especially poor references which is unaccepted. RenRen070193 13:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Q*Bert
Temporary semi-protection:Edit warring on main page; more nonsensical posts on the talk page.
Crboyer (
talk)
17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by John Reaves for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
19:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
02:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined User was blocked by
JamesBWatson
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of
User:TV5Ozamiz.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
02:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined User was blocked by
JamesBWatson
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Link is currently featured on "in the news". Semi-protection until it is no longer a current event requested.
8.14.172.48 (
talk)
13:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined IPs are also making good faith edits such as
this, which semi-protection would prevent.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
17:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection:
BLP policy violates and persistent vandalism since I noticed earlier especially poor references which is unaccepted. RenRen070193 13:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Q*Bert
Temporary semi-protection:Edit warring on main page; more nonsensical posts on the talk page.
Crboyer (
talk)
17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by John Reaves for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
19:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Cahk (
talk)
10:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism.
7&6=thirteen (
☎)
12:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: This is intended to be a redirect to the Disney Channel TV series
Liv and Maddie, and should be no reason for users to make this other than a redirect.
MPFitz1968 (
talk)
15:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Coffee.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of
original research which cannot be confirmed by
reliable sources.
livelikemusic
talk!
15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template –
WP:UPPROT request: page is substituted by my user script
User:Evad37/ToDoLister.
Evad37 [
talk
15:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism (02/26/16) – Continued addition of
original research which cannot be confirmed by
reliable sources.
Ibarabi (
talk)
15:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
15:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes:
BLP policy violations – BLP/vandalism issues going back a while, occurring intermittently but not, I think, often enough to justify semi.
Everymorning
(talk)
23:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This is few and far between...not even on a level for pending changes. I have watchlisted instead.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
02:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term protection is required due to high influx of new accounts intent on vandalizing this article .
McMatter (
talk)/(
contrib)
03:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long term vandalism of this article, apparently by someone personally connected with the subject's family.
Chrisw80 (
talk)
09:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
10:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
10:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons (e.g., 60.50.28.231) have been changing this page.
Caballero/Historiador
⎌
11:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A swarm of IPs and new users vandalising the page today. A couple of days should be enough.
Sjö (
talk)
11:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would like to request pending changes protection for this page, just as we did for the
Azad Kashmir page. The same issues arising here, IP's changing Pakistan to India etc.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
20:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let us try for 1 year first, can always be extended if needed.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
My House
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user continuously removes the name of
JayFrance from the credits. See the history page of
My House (Flo Rida song).
Eurofan88 (
talk)
21:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Song article has been
Semi-protected by EdJohnston for three months, the EP article remains unprotected.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
LG-Gunther :
Talk
05:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely by Courcelles.
tutterMouse (
talk)
08:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
00:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Drmies (
talk)
03:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
00:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Drmies (
talk)
03:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing after recent release from protection period.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
00:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
Drmies (
talk)
03:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: Highly visible template – Pinging
Ruud Koot (last protecting admin); this template with 60,000 or so transclusions probably doesn't need full protection, no particularly sensitive transclusions are known either.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
20:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Jo-Jo Eumerus: Done, although I have my doubts this template should even still exist (see its talk page). —
Ruud
22:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done for the bot.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruption and IP hopping. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
22:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for 2 weeks.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and/or possible socking.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
01:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Drmies (
talk)
03:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruption and IP hopping. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
22:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for two weeks.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. We've tried temporary before. This looks long-term.
Edwardx (
talk)
22:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. by Drmies.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (2001:468:d01:92:1409:fd8e:7bda:44e2; 70.56.255.40; 2001:468:d01:92:944f:5b59:136a:9bed; 128.223.147.27) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article.
Jayaguru-Shishya (
talk)
01:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for 1 week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started as the protection ended.
Musa
Talk
01:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for one week.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, most of which is long-term.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
01:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for 6 months.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism today. They seem to hop to another once the IP is warned a couple of times, to avoid AIV action. .
Crow
Caw
01:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Drmies for 6 months.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Most recent from two accounts (both reported to
WP:AIV). Note that the vandalism occurred immediately after the protection period.
AeroAuxiliary (
talk)
04:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 3 months.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same person using different IP's adding the same unsourced content I keep removing. —
Calvin999
21:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same person using different IP's adding the same unsourced content I keep removing. —
Calvin999
21:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To preemptively prevent sock puppets of
Soft skin from continuing their racist trolling. .
GAB
Hello!
23:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Despite low editing, bad edits have been reverted lately.
George Ho (
talk)
19:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined. PC protection will expire on Feb. 27. Problematic edits have been infrequent enough lately that normal page watching should be adequate to deal with it. Ask again if the situation changes.
MelanieN (
talk)
21:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs reverting good faith edits.
Binksternet (
talk)
19:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected Last protection was for one year. Since it's a BLP I think indefinite protection is warranted.
Katie
talk
20:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The page should not have been protected, in my opinion. The behavior of the IPs has been neither better nor worse than that of editors using accounts. Binksternet apparently has an editing dispute with the IPs, and gains an unfair advantage through article semi-protection.
FreeKnowledgeCreator (
talk)
20:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- FKC is correct. This has to do with 128.175.185.8
undoing an edit from FyddleStix. After MarkBernstein added it back, DHeyward (not an IP) removed it again. Binksternet restored it a second time and then 128.4.140.76
removed it. This attempt to block IPs within minutes of this seems like B avoiding discussing the issue with DH and blaming it on IPs alone when it is not an IP-only issue. The two 128s might be the same editor, maybe their ISP rotated them in that 10 hour interim between edits or something.
184.145.18.50 (
talk)
20:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I have to share the above opinion. There has been a dispute over content, but the contribution of IPs was no more disruptive than that of other editors, and they weren't involved in BLP violations. -
Bilby (
talk)
21:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Quite. And Binksternet's rationale for semi-protection is flawed, in any case: that an edit is made in good faith does not mean it must not or should not be reverted. Good faith edits can legitimately be reverted in many cases. If anything, full protection of the article - to stop both IPs and most users using user accounts from editing - would have been more appropriate, since it looks as though an extended conflict is developing at the Sommers page.
FreeKnowledgeCreator (
talk)
21:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Confirming other IP is me. Using two devices.
128.175.185.8 (
talk)
22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Hmmm...having read the (rather extensive) talk-page of the article, this is definitely a content dispute, with the Ip's behaviour not better or worse than that of the established editors. @
Katie...would you reconsider?
Lectonar (
talk)
22:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, reviewed it all, and now it's
Fully protected for three days.
Katie
talk
22:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruption, as well as IP hopping and sock puppetry. Very sticky and annoying, and its a major problem on these Safavid-related articles. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
22:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article redirected day of protection expiration, requesting longer PP.
☾Loriendrew☽
☏(ring-ring)
20:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by different users.
331dot (
talk)
22:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Made his debut, so loads of unsourced additions and vandalism .
JMHamo (
talk)
22:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Number 57. —
MusikAnimal
talk
22:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
03:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
172.58.33.31 (
talk)
04:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring/edit wars.
172.58.33.31 (
talk)
04:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Alexius
Horatius
19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring/content dispute.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
20:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Incessant trickle of red user and IP vandalism.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
20:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Some good edits; some bad. I can see edits reverted. --
George Ho (
talk)
02:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: I've had three IPs vandalise my user page in the last couple of days. Semi-protection would be useful.
Marianna251
TALK
16:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: persistant edit warring of unsouced content into article. 1 month maybe? Thanks.
Jytdog (
talk)
17:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user persistently vandalizing page.
Jdcomix (
talk)
18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Jim1138 (
talk)
20:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
clpo13(
talk)
01:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Peacemaker67 for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and SPA.
Jim1138 (
talk)
10:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Peacemaker67 for 3 days.
tutterMouse (
talk)
16:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
18:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no good IP edits for a long time.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Explained on
Talk:Undefined#Talk. -- .
Frankie
talk
21:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done - Thanks for the heads up
Frankie, I've notified
WP:VPT to see if we can swiftly deal with this issue. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes Persistent edit warring.
James J. Lambden (
talk)
08:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Coffee.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP users adding the bogus name "Javad Rameezani" on the article. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب.
Areaseven (
talk)
08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
A guy saved by Jesus (
talk)
18:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no good IP edits for a long time.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Explained on
Talk:Undefined#Talk. -- .
Frankie
talk
21:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done - Thanks for the heads up
Frankie, I've notified
WP:VPT to see if we can swiftly deal with this issue. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes Persistent edit warring.
James J. Lambden (
talk)
08:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Coffee.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP users adding the bogus name "Javad Rameezani" on the article. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب.
Areaseven (
talk)
08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
09:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately resume of sock-puppet behavior editing that leads to the page's
previous protections.
livelikemusic
talk!
16:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Article has just become unprotected after one month of semi-protection and is already being vandalized by one or more unregistered editors.
ElKevbo (
talk)
00:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- (The IP addresses all map back to the college if someone has some time on their hands and a desire to e-mail the college's abuse address.
ElKevbo (
talk)
00:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC))
reply
Semi-protected by Ixfd64 for a frankly pathetic 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: The racist troll is back and will just keep creating new accounts until the page is protected.
MarnetteD|
Talk
01:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Ian.thomson for 24 hours.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
FIFA election
Temporary semi-protection: Given that he was just elected, and there's already been some low-level IP vandalism.
Sounder
Bruce
17:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined completely for the first, and not yet for Infantino. High edit rate doesn't equal disruption, though I do see a brewing conflict over the Italian/Swiss/Greek thing. If it gets worse, let us know. :-)
Katie
talk
22:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The problem users have all been blocked, but the socks proliferate very quickly. Protecting to give everybody a break from Whack-a-Mole.
MelanieN (
talk)
01:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Promotional SPAs edit warring to add poorly-sourced, promotional fluff to a BLP.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
20:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked /64 for one week.
Katie
talk
22:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
GAB
Hello!
01:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected.
Courcelles (
talk)
01:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts to make this look resl.
Doug Weller
talk
21:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
23:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dispute over wording and sources of a particular section (see
[106]).
clpo13(
talk)
23:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. to encourage editors to thrash out consensus on talk.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting semi-protection of my own talk page due to sockpuppetry by
Alexiulian25 (
talk ·
contribs).
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
00:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Already protected by administrator
Ponyo.
Materialscientist (
talk)
00:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
2607:FB90:270D:97C1:0:38:C4C4:AE01 (
talk)
19:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
20:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Katie
talk
22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Érico
(talk)
21:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page was recently un-protected 3 days ago, and it has already had 5 obvious vandalisms since.
Lizard (
talk)
22:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
16:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. If he resumes, take it to AIV for block evasion by you-know-who.
Katie
talk
16:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinate semi-protection: This page has a history of protection, which always ends up with vandals coming back for more. Even with pending changes, all edits from IPs are vandalism.
Declined
Katie
talk 16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC) PC is working just fine.
Katie
talk
16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Requesting Talk page semi-protection for the next couple of hours until sock quietens down with their fake edit warring notices.
Mike1901 (
talk)
19:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Courcelles (
talk)
20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by clutch of related IPs.
IdreamofJeanie (
talk)
19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
16:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's continue to add same unsourced, non-notable list entry to page. They do not engage when notified on their talk pages, just keep edit warring with no explanation.
Jacona (
talk)
20:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
16:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death date vandalism continues on this article. The article was already protected once. Can we do it again and for longer?.
Dismas|
(talk)
14:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
16:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Till now three non-registered (IP) users have deleted/modified more or less the same information from this article page. It seems that it is the same user using different IP addresses (182.59.82.191/182.59.112.241/182.59.72.210) and all the three IP addresses are located in the same place with the geographical co-ordinates being 19.076 (latitude), 72.8777 (longitude) for all the three IP addresses (source: ww.IPlocation.net). So no doubt it's the same user. Therefore, warning the user or even blocking the user is not an option. Hence, I request you to semi-protect this article. Thank you. —
Deepak_HK「
@talk」
15:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
16:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – Non-stop IP BLP vandalism.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
16:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined Vandalism is under control and there are some useful IP contribs.
Yaris678 (
talk)
12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qed237
(talk)
16:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
16:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent editing, but reverts are happening lately.
George Ho (
talk)
20:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined The recent spate of vandalism seems to be a small number of IPs/new accounts, who seem to have stopped.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
16:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
16:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
17:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: New page with unreliable edits. Difficult to monitor each edit.
raul1798 (
talk)
12:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined, some of the IP edits seem to be constructive, and this might be crucial for the article which is currently AfDed.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur despite low editing.
George Ho (
talk)
20:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Had been PC protected for 6 months, which was about to expire. Vandalism was persisting so I think indefinite PC is the best option in the circumstances.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Resurgent vandalism after previous protection expired.
T
v
x1
23:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Datbubblegumdoe
talk –
contribs
15:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User keeps reverting a redirect to a renamed account.
Renameduser024 (
talk)
19:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Redirects should stay.
QuackGuru (
talk)
19:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- You don't control user's talk pages. Stop with your harassment please.
Renameduser024 (
talk)
19:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- This is not your user talk page. It is a redirect.
QuackGuru (
talk)
19:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renameduser024 can you login as Mrfrobinson (to prove its you) and add the {{
retire}} to the old account (even as a dummy edit because its there already-- add a period or something). Then read over
WP:Clean Start make sure your doing this right. --
Moxy (
talk)
20:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
A suspicious
IP has returned.
QuackGuru (
talk)
21:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: An anon IP has been edit-warring for a day to add uncited personal-life claims to this biographical article, despite two registered editors reverting him. Needless to say, he's not discussing anything. --20:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- And now that anon IP — who was blocked today as a sock of blocked registered user
User:Optim.usprime — is block-evading again, making the identical edit under the guise
User:2607:fb90:24a3:6364:0:31:c882:2c01. --
Tenebrae (
talk)
22:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
clpo13(
talk) 23:47, 27 February (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Musa
Talk
14:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
DavidLeighEllis (
talk)
00:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template protection: Highly visible template. –
Nascar1996 (
talk •
cont)
03:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism television. --
忍者ポップ (
talk)
06:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. 31 hours. --
忍者ポップ (
talk)
06:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recreation of article over redirect
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
IP socking, fringe promotion and edit-warring.
Krakkos (
talk)
14:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.}--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced hoax death claims and related vandalism
.
General Ization
Talk
02:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
10:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
05:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.. Persistent, yes, but only one IP address, which I just blocked. But if they restart with a different IP, then make another request here.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
05:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
10:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
10:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created 4 times in 4 days, A7'd every time.
Azealia911
talk
21:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection:
BLP policy violations – One month passed after semi-protection expired.
George Ho (
talk)
23:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Courcelles (
talk)
07:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Qpalzmmzlapq |
talk |
contribs
03:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 1 year.
tutterMouse (
talk)
06:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of same totally unsourced material, PoV "This is highly educated area of the town" and long list of non-notable people - SPA IP warned numerous times now also has an account. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we just indef-semi this page, PC is just as bad as reverting the vandals in the first place.
Mlpearc (
open channel)
23:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: A user has been harrassing me non-stop. Even though the user is blocked each time, they change their IP address every time to keep doing it. For the next few days, I will be rounding up every single one of the user's IP addresses and their account (
Nolantron) for a SOCK investigation. I will need my talk page and, if necessary, my user page protected until this is over.
Dark
Knight
2149
02:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Fair enough.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
04:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long term edit warring over genres.
I call the big one bitey (
talk)
02:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
172.58.33.31 (
talk)
05:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined IP vandalism is a few days old. Mostly one IP, which has been blocked. Since then an IP has added good content.
Yaris678 (
talk)
22:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect being hijacked by a sockpuppeteer who wants to write a different version of the article.
McGeddon (
talk)
19:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
03:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined - report was good at the time but it looks like the disruption has ended.
Alexius
Horatius
19:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Page just came off semi-protection, and the ip has started reverting again. Another week or two of protection might be helpful. Thanks. —
Jess·
Δ
♥
03:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see vandalism; I see a content dispute and edit warring. There is discussion at the talk page; I'm locking the article for a day to give you all the chance to work it out without anyone getting blocked.
MelanieN (
talk)
00:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.
172.58.32.83 (
talk)
00:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me)
00:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @
03:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP blanking and vandalism.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (
talk)
18:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a constant target for sneaky vandalism (changes in numbers). The content of this page should change rarely, only when the IMF, WB or CIA update their figures yearly. IPs constantly change data counter to given sources. Requesting protection for a decent while as it get's very tiresome to check sources and inevitably revert edits.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
19:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
22:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reason and request as
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita above.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
22:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism relating to the "Damn Daniel" online trend. --
Ches
(talk)
22:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2602:306:3357:BA0:81AF:E18A:628B:6212 (
talk)
22:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of drive-by IPs unhappy that the grain is also called "rapeseed", other POV-pushing.
Montanabw
(talk)
02:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Another article where drive-by IPs do nothing but vandalize.
Montanabw
(talk)
02:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try one year first--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – She is currently part of a political Drama in India because of a aggressive speech she gave against her opposition which are inviting trolls to the page!.
A m i t
웃
02:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
22:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Jdcomix (
talk)
19:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
BethNaught (
talk)
19:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regardless of (in)frequency of editing, this page suffers from reverts of bad edits. Alternatively, renew pending changes.
George Ho (
talk)
21:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur despite infrequent editing.
George Ho (
talk)
21:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
21:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – One day the recreation will be chronic.
Britty192 (
talk)
21:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
CAPTAIN RAJU (
✉)
11:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Note: We should perhaps ask
Vipinhari if he wants it protected.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Please semi-protect my userpage.
Vipinhari ||
talk
16:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Continued disruptive edits after expiration of initial protection.
331dot (
talk)
12:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 3 instances of vandalism since the last protection expired.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Blanking and inclusion of OR by 3-4 IPs since November 2015.
Zoupan
15:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption began immediately after expiration of previous one month lock.
Katie
talk
17:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing.
Garchy (
talk)
17:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
Marianna251
TALK
17:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Katie
talk
17:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism .
JMHamo (
talk)
19:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While there are some disruptive edits, the majority of non-autoconfirmed edits appear to be constructive. Any admin is free to override this decision if the rate of disruption increases. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -
Anjana Larka
SEND WIKILOVE💗
12:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The vandalism was days ago and has died down; it it picks up, please relist.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – AfD template is continually being removed before consensus is reached.
Boomer Vial
Holla
12:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Match today and disruption has started.
Qed237
(talk)
14:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While there is some disruption, the majority of non-autoconfirmed edits are constructive. If that changes feel free to re-request protection, but remember we want to encourage editing not prevent it. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is vandalized or tested by IPs at least once in a day. I don't see why this shouldn't be semi-protected but PC protected. -- .
Frankie
talk
16:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – numerous forms of
disruptive editing.
4TheWynne
(talk)
(contribs)
13:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
{{
RFPP|aiv}}
For both IPs, 111. and 66....
Lectonar (
talk)
13:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are various other IPs not that long ago.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warning. --
忍者ポップ (
talk)
10:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
User(s)
blocked. For all articles listed.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Done (for the bot)
Lectonar (
talk)
13:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons ( 60.50.28.231 175.136.224.245) have been systematically vandalizing my userpage and leaving the same messages (in Malay). .
Caballero/Historiador
⎌
12:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected
Lectonar (
talk)
12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of
non-free content (inappropriate in template namespace per
WP:NFCC#9) by three separate IPs (
possibly IP-hopping) during the last week. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs)
13:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
13:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Both articles have been repeatedly recreated by
a socking hoaxer.
McGeddon (
talk)
11:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Creation protected Both.
Lectonar (
talk)
11:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Repeatedly moved to redundant "(2016 film)", "(film)", "Disney's ... (2016 Film)" titles recently.
McGeddon (
talk)
11:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Move protected
Lectonar (
talk)
11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi protection: Semi-protection has fallen off of this article (again) as a result of one editor moving it and another moving it back. (The protection stayed on the
Disney's Zootopia (2016 Film) article that it was moved to. Is this a bug?) Article was previously protected through to April due to a sock vandal. --
McGeddon (
talk)
11:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think it's a bug; I remember happening things like this...but can not remember why they happen.
Lectonar (
talk)
12:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting protection to prevent the racist refdesk troll from exploiting another opportunity to keep trolling.
GAB
Hello!
00:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: It's here at last - February 29, Wikipedia time.
<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (
talk)
01:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined –
Pages are not protected preemptively. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered nationalists and separatists flock to this page of a convicted separatist, resulting in persistent vandalism. Better to semi-protect it.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
10:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yaris678 (
talk)
11:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
172.58.33.87 (
talk)
19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Permanent Semi-protection: Regular (albeit relatively infrequent) vandalism of previously temporarily semi-protected page with.
fredgandt
06:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending changes:
BLP policy violations.
Musa
Talk
07:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk)
08:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal edit inserted by multiple IPs.
Marianna251
TALK
23:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
172.56.39.205 (
talk)
23:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
General Ization
Talk
00:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Lots of users editing page with troll unreliable information about this boat entering the Falcon 9 SES-9 launch exclusion zone.
107.5.215.61 (
talk)
01:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP in news, some vandalism.
ViperSnake151
Talk
01:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –
Disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors, by the way of addition in information that violates the
crystal ball policy,
reliable sources and
original research not supported by
verifiable sources.
livelikemusic
talk!
03:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same kind of editing patterns that lead to page's previous protections. Page requires some restructuring that could be disrupted by anonymous editors adding in information that cannot be confirmed by
reliable sources.
livelikemusic
talk!
03:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism.
Jdcomix (
talk)
03:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to Oscars' result.
©
Tbhotch
™ (
en-2.5).
04:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unnecessary and unsourced genres in the article in the last few days.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk)
15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: Edit warring by multiple newly-created user ids
User:Mada2016 and
User:Doodle 2016, vandalism by
User:Arshad Xihan.
Jc3s5h (
talk)
17:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC) corrected & updated 20:45
reply
-
Comment: I've also RPP'd
February 29
here.
<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (
talk)
01:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: obsessed fans making themselves relatives or partners of this BLP. Lengthy log.
'''tAD''' (
talk)
17:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2602:306:3357:BA0:C55D:A696:A8C6:A172 (
talk)
18:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various IPs edit-warring to add an unsourced "TBA" cast list added by blocked sock
User:UndergroundZootopie.
McGeddon (
talk)
12:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple IP's continuously adding contact numbers to the page since very long time.
GSS (
talk)
14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Full protection: BLP that keeps getting restored without any reliable sources, and will likely continue if left unprotected.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
14:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Fully protected indefinitely. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
04:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Sam Shemtob (
talk)
20:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
reply