users have grown tired of discussing just like
last year, though the issue is still unresolved and reverting continues
Additional issues (added by other parties)
Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to
sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the talk page of this request.
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be
accepted or
rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
We do not yet have the agreement of all the listed parties, and seven days (the customary maximum time an RfM can remain pending for) have elapsed. Are we unable to proceed without the editors who have not commented yet? Is there any reason why they haven't commented yet, other than inactivity?
AGK11:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)reply
The users further down were a little less involved with the discussion, some of them came in to comment on the RfC. As far as I remember, Ost316 and jgp are the only ones who could qualify as interested in this. Could be wrong, though.
Prime Blue (
talk)
15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)reply
If the filing party can gather some more widespread agreement from those editors who have commented on this request that mediation can proceed without those who are absent , then I would accept this request. We unfortunately cannot proceed without the agreement of all the parties unless there is consensus that the absent parties are not essential to the dispute, so otherwise I would be compelled to reject this request. I'll give you guys a couple of days' working room to get statements of agreement. Sorry for the awkward hoops that have to be jumped through, but we simply need to confirm that all the important parties to the dispute are on-board before proceeding.
AGK11:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I think the major parties have already accepted the mediation request, so I have no objections to proceeding with the people we have here.
Nomader(
Talk)14:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I have notified jgp and Ost316 again, and additionally left messages for all parties that have signed up so far to ask for their agreement to commence without the other parties.
Prime Blue (
talk)
11:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)reply
As you'll note from
WP:RFM/G#Accepted requests, cases that have only just been accepted will essentially remain in limbo until a mediator becomes available. This can take upwards of two or three weeks, and probably will. But no, if you add this page to your watchlist, then you'll see changes to both this page and the talk page attached to this page, which are the only pages that will be used.
AGK10:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.