Click 'show' to view an index of all archives
|
Rejected mediation request pages
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
-
Geni (
talk ·
contribs)
-
UnitedNut (
talk ·
contribs)
- GENI opted to remove an entire file covering the history of the kidnapping of Iowa television reported Jodi Huisentruit. The profile was updated on December 9th with non-copyrighted information pulled from various public and law-enforcement websites covering the case. GENI contention is the material was copyrighted and instead of removing the areas I edited, opted to remove the entire file from Wikipedia. A search of the source material: findjodi.com and
http://www.iowaonline.state.ia.us/mpic/Controller.aspx?cmd=personDetailCommand&id=94 will confirm that none of the material referenced in the updates was in fact copy righted. (It would be one thing if the material was extracted from a book published on the subject, but that is not the case here. The material is actually public knowledge and was used to update the minimal information that was appearing on Wikipedia.
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.
- Reject: First, this is not a matter for mediation: there are no issues framed for mediation, and there is no evidence of previous attempts to resolve the issue. Second, there has been no notice to the other party. Third, the originator has not signed his agreement.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
03:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
-
Jeffpw
18:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Agree.
reply
-
Joel on the SOL
19:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Disagree
reply
- Agree.
Dev920 (Have a nice day!)
18:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: The parties do not agree to mediate.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
01:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
- Whether certain words are POV
- Definition of NPOV
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.
Tinosa
15:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree.
Wiki
eZach|
talk
16:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree.
Storm Rider
(talk)
16:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree.
BRMo
17:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Don't really consider myself part of the dispute, however, I Agree -
Visorstuff
16:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree.
Sqrjn
23:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. --
Trödel
21:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Apparently
Wiki
eZach|
talk's straw poll is going to be delayed a bit longer. I wanted to see how that went first. Agree
Duke53 |
Talk
20:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Reject: All parties did not agree to mediate within the seven day window.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
Arose from:
Most recent:
... and many
more.
- Should
ShadowHalo be allowed to place the
{{Replaceable fair use}}
template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --
sony-youth
talk
00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. —
ShadowHalo
00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
Arose from:
Most recent:
... and many
more.
- Should
ShadowHalo be allowed to place the
{{Replaceable fair use}}
template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --
sony-youth
talk
00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. —
ShadowHalo
00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
Arose from:
Most recent:
... and many
more.
- Should
ShadowHalo be allowed to place the
{{Replaceable fair use}}
template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --
sony-youth
talk
00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. —
ShadowHalo
00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
Arose from:
Most recent:
... and many
more.
- Should
ShadowHalo be allowed to place the
{{Replaceable fair use}}
template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --
sony-youth
talk
00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. —
ShadowHalo
00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
- Issue 1; This is a serious and urgent matter. Sarah made an unfounded accusation that I have an "anti-american agenda". Even though she named Ottawaman, it is directed towards me since she states chategorically that is who I am and she made the accusation in a section discussing me.
[2] That section of the incident noticeboard was soon thereafter archived. In this post 9/11 world such an accusation can be quite harmful to me personally in a variety of ways. I would like her to withdraw that accusation and apologize for it within the archived section.
- Issue 2
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.Canuckster
- Disagree.
Sarah Ewart
06:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: Parties do not agree to medaite.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
08:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
- Characterization of opposition forces in the paragraph describing Toyotomi's failed invasion of China through Korea.
- Naming the leader(s) in that opposition force.
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.
Geeman
23:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Agree. --
ShinjukuXYZ
11:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Reject - Parties fail to show agreement to mediate.
- For the Mediation Committee, ^
demon
[omg plz]
00:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was
rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a
new request.
|
- The user Hurmeez continues to post false and malicious information which is purposly damaging to the image of Gigablast, Inc. Clearly this user is a former employee or has some relation to a former employee. This is a place for facts, not a forum for opinion and false information.
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
Jpolivares agree
Hurmeez agree
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject: Issue is not a matter for mediation; mediations are attempts to reach a compromise on specific issues. The parties have failed to frame any issues whatsoever, but rather filed a request based on an ad hominem attack.
- For the Mediation Committee,
Essjay
(Talk)
21:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
reply