To remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 06:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 13:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC).

• Rukario-sama ( talk · contribs · logs)

Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page.

We have an article called Mega Man Legends 3. It is about a game that was cancelled. Now, user Rukario-sama ( talk · contribs) desperately tries to add a fan Facebook group without any reliable sources. I tried to contact him but Rukario-sama still fails to understand our policies concerning verifiability, notability etc. Artem Karimov ( talk) 06:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC) reply

I would be glad if the user changes his pattern of edits in accordance with Wikipedia verifiability policies. If impossible, recommend sanctions to be applied to the user. Artem Karimov ( talk) 06:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC) reply

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. Editors writing this section should not normally add additional views below.}

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

1. edit 1
2. edit 2

{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:V
2. WP:PRIMARY
3. WP:NOT

(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Artem Karimov ( talk · contribs · logs)

1. Caution
2. Reply

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}

Users who endorse this summary:

This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute. Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.