If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zeumic}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Supporting evidence: While it is clearly obvious that all of the new single-purpose accounts which have shown up on
Talk:Geoffrey Edelsten are either sock or meatpuppets, the purpose of this request is so that we can take effective action on it. Wikifactsright was identified in March 2008 as related to the PR company hired by the subject of the article, who had also written the website that these accounts appear to be promoting. (See earlier completed request
here) (See below)
Orderinchaos02:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Janusreverted has stopped barely short of legal threats themselves but has echoed off-wiki ones.
[1] As far as I know this isn't a violation of
WP:LEGAL but is skating on rather thin ice.
Orderinchaos07:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Confirmed the following accounts are the same person
A particularly disruptive and accusative user has surfaced on the
Geoffrey Edelsten article, as well as on
Talk:Geoffrey Edelsten and other venues in an attempt to have any negative content of the page removed. He has been blocked today for 3RR and had engaged in considerable forum shopping, and is wasting a considerable amount of community time. Based on the very similar content being introduced to the article by Zeumic on the same article late last year (I would link diffs but they're deleted ones - see
Special:DeletedContributions/Zeumic, there's under 15), and the fact both seem to be exclusively dedicated to this article, I believe there is a reasonable possibility that these users are the same and think this check is warranted.
Orderinchaos20:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Additional information needed As Zeumic is not currently editing, I am inclined to decline. Assuming it is true, how would this change your approach to the editor? What would you/could you do if it was confirmed that you can't do otherwise?
Thatcher20:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Zeumic (Edelsten's web development and promotions company
[2][3]) had a confirmed conflict of interest with regards to the article. If the two users are in fact the same person, it would be possible to deal with the new user's contributions using the
conflict of interest guideline.
Orderinchaos22:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.