Wikipedia:requests For Checkuser Case Ttchiem

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ttchiem}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Ttchiem

Ttchiem ( talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
BrookieDragon ( talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Getlow ( talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Ulver99 ( talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
24.250.178.209 ( talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))

Two vanity photos Image:Japanophile.jpg and Image:Otaku.jpg which were originally uploaded by Ttchiem ( talk • contribs) are continually being restored to the Japanophile and Otaku articles by the above limited-edit accounts despite the consensus of four other editors and myself that the photos are inappropriate for Wikipedia. See also Talk:Japanophile and Talk:Otaku for examples of the above accounts supporting each other in arguing for the use of the above images. -- Netsnipe ^(Talk) 17:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply

The one IP address could be mine as I do recall posting once but forgetting to log in. Hardly qualifies me as a "sock puppet" though.

You are using a three times revision rule against me here where the otaku picture has been enabled for several months and established in the article. The picture was then removed randomly, but restored by more then one user. The rule should apply if I'm not mistaken to trying to remove something against the wiki communities will also.

Your claim that 5 users are against it is a little weak also since several of the withdrawels have been from random IP's. Saying that a picture looks goofy or is cliche (when talking about a stereotype for the article) on that subject is also not a valid reason. -- BrookieDragon 17:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Clerk note: First of all, stop messing around with each other's text. It makes it very hard to follow the intent of the request. Second, if BrookieDragon wants to file a separate request, please open it as a separate subpage, don't add it to this one. Be sure to state clearly how it follows the guidelines listed on the main checkuser page, and be aware that the checkusers generally take a dim view of retaliatory requests. Thatcher131 (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.