Final (62/8/1); Ended Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:49:13 UTC
Yandman ( talk · contribs) - In the half year that Yandman has been with us, he has quickly established himself as an excellent Wikipedian. He is a good article editor, firmly committed to article quality and NPOV. He has amassed an impressive 4000 edits, well balanced across all namespaces. He has participated in a lot of admin-related areas recently, on the admin noticeboards, in dealing with vandalism, and on AfD and similar discussions. Whenever I've seen him around, his contributions have struck me as exemplary of what we need in an admin: sound of judgment, mature in interaction, precise in argumentation, always strongly anchored in Wikipedia policies and principles. I have seen him in controversial AfDs and other hot debates, and every time (even when one might not always have agreed with his opinions) I've found the things he said well reasoned, rational, and beneficiary to a resolution. This guy seems responsible and trustworthy.
Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
Optional question from Diez2 ( talk · contribs)
Optional Question(s) from: S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral