Final (36/22/5); Originally scheduled to end 23:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC). No consensus to promote. -- Deskana (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC) reply
The Haunted Angel ( talk · contribs) - The Haunted Angel has grown immensely since his ill-fated first attempt at adminship, so much so that I don't even recognize him as the same person. I think this quote from his editor review sums it up rather well: "Hey The Haunted Angel. I've known you around Wikipedia for a while now, and you're a very helpful user who does very good edits. You've helped with the Coheed and Cambria articles greatly, that article just one of many. You're a nice, calm editor, who has a good sense of humour, but while maintaining a humourous way, your edits are still up to scratch. As with any good editor, you revert vandalism well and warn/notify the user of it. I can't really think of any advice for you, you seem to do everything so well". I want to emphasize how completely different that is from his first RFA, which frankly sucked. However, I would not have nominated him if I didn't feel that he's not the same person anymore. I see a potential need for the tools, and I see a user who I can trust to handle them well. ⇒ SWATJester Son of the Defender 21:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC) reply
My first RfA was, as the nominator stated, far too premature. I hope that this one shall improve vastly.
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
User:Wwagner/Userboxes/Grammar Nazi (see
prior revision)
Question from Carnildo
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/The Haunted Angel before commenting.