Strong support - Flcelloguy is a friendly Wikipedian who's shown quite a bit of dedication and enthusiasm to this project. Would be a great admin.
Sango123 19:54, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Strong support - very willing to work together, has done fine work in building the music section. Has carefully helped resolve a standing issue already; I believe he would make a fine admin.
Schissel :
bowl listen 19:59, August 1, 2005 (UTC) (Edit: I believe at least two vote-in-favor edits - one is still in the history - were lost, not retracted, while you were answering the questions! :) )
Support. I love you Flcelloguy. Also a friend of Y0u is a friend of Redwolf24.
Redwolf24 01:21, 2 August 2005 (UTC) pffft not even a thank you for that enthusiastic support?
Redwolf2403:45, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. And a friend of Redwolf's is a friend of mine (about 3 degrees of wiki separation there). Good edit counts, and he's been around just as long as I, giving me hope. :) Good luck! -
mysekurity04:35, 2 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I would feel a little bit better if you had been here a little longer, but you've got everything else going for you. I see you all the time at
Clueless Newbies. You would definitely benefit from
sysop rights.
Ryan 05:48, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Most of the time, a short activity time leads me to ponder my vote quite carefully, but this is not the case here. I fully offer my support to this editor's nomination and believe he will become an outstanding admin. --
Sn0wflake18:44, 2 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, I like what I see, and this shouldn't be a big deal anyway. --
Spangineer(háblame) 13:57, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support Time isn't an issue, since edits speak louder than words, and words louder than seniority. Wikipedia would benefit with a mop in Flcelloguy's hands.
Bratschetalk5 pillars 15:04, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support per reasons above. -
JCarriker 06:03, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
Support 3 months is long enough (and a looong time to devote to a free project). Anyway, supposively you're not really supposed to make many edits to an article at once and use the preview button instead, but then I do the same thing to a somewhat lesser degree so of course I'm going to support :). --
RN06:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep. Er, too much time on VfD. You know what I mean. --
Dmcdevit·
t 21:48, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Good contributor to VfD.
android79 04:38, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Support. If I recall correctly, I was nominated for adminship just over three months after I started editing Wikipedia, and I had only a thousand edits. —
Knowledge Seekerদ 07:30, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Support. He's been here long enough to demonstrate he's a good editor, understands policy, and is cordial to others, particularly newbies. --
MPerel (
talk |
contrib)02:50, 8 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Neutral I would definately vote support, but the user hasn't been here long enough yet.
Thunderbrand 04:36, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
The user's great work notwithstanding, with less than three months here, just not enough experience for Adminship. I would support in a while from now, when he's been around for four or five months. Solid work.
Redux05:36, 2 August 2005 (UTC)reply
What about the
Canadians and
Mexicans? I think we need to invent the term "United Statesian" to refer to all of us people who apparently think we're citizens of the only country in the
Americas. --
Spangineer(háblame) 13:57, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
I could suggest the use of "from the USA", but I am sure people wouldn't listen, so North America is likely the next best thing. This way you end up excluding 2 countries instead of over a dozen. --
Sn0wflake20:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I definitely haven't been here long enough to actually toss in a vote, but I offer my support to Flcelloguy for his timely and friendly response to my question on the Helpdesk. Good luck!
Soundstruck18:43, 8 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. Being trusted with the powers of an administrator would be a huge help for me. I currently do a lot of RC patrolling — I "specialize" in newpages patrol, where I tag a large quantity of pages with speedy deletes. Being able to delete them immediately would be useful and would also help reduce the occasional backlogs on speedy deletes. In addition, I sometimes do run into persistant- and annoying- vandals, and after various futile warnings, have reported them on
WP:AIV, where they have been blocked. Also, having the "revert" buttom would also become handy when I do "regular" RC patrolling. Finally, I would be able to help out the
WP:VfD backlog. Of course, I would use all the admin powers carefully- I will never violate the trust the community has given me.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I am proud of all my contributions, as all of them, no matter how minor they are, help contribute towards Wikipedia. However, there are several contributions I feel stand out:
xiangqi, which I nominated and pushed to become a
featured article, and
competition, which I edited as part of the cleanup taskforce. Finally, I am also proud of my role in
Wikipedia:Clueless newbies.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I respect everyone's opinion, and I value every bit of advice given to me. I am always open to opinions, and will always be polite. That being said, I have not had any major conflicts. The only "conflict" I can think of is with
User:Giano regarding Boothy443's mass opposition vote; however, I feel that I acted politely, and both of us (I believe) carry no hard feelings. It was actually more of a constructive discussion rather than a dispute.