This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 4, 2024.
Airport route
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It's impossible to associate this term with a single article, and I doubt a dab will be useful either. Propose retargeting to somewhere like
Airport#Access_and_onward_travel or deleting.
NotAGenious (
talk) 16:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting since the second redirect wasn't tagged until now, and considering that a new target was brought up late in the discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Airport#Access and onward travel: Although Tavix is correct that people might be searching for routes within airports, the redirect to the Airport article covers both since the section immediately below "Access and onward travel" is "Internal transport". I've also added a {{see also}} in "Internal transport" to
List of airport people mover systems.
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 16:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Na Sé Contaethe
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. After two relists, editors remain divided between keep, retarget, and delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ToadetteEdit! 07:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The Irish term translates to 'The Six Counties' which is an
alternative name for Northern Ireland. I believe that this is a plausible redirect and does not violate
WP:RFOREIGN hence I would opt for keep.
Golem08 (
talk) 21:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
That would be valid if it were used as such, but Google returns next to nothing, and
The Six Counties is a redlink.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 10:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, there is mention. Refine to
Northern Ireland#Nationalist which has
na Sé Chontae. Alternatively an anchor by that name may be created, and the redirects can point to that. Jay 💬 10:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Nanashi (MÄR)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 20:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore.
* Pppery *it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ToadetteEdit! 06:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep but retarget to the chapter list. I don't see a reason to delete it since it's mentioned and redirects are
WP:CHEAP.
Link20XX (
talk) 15:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 00:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article. Apparently, the subject of these redirects is in regards to a true story (doctor who became a rapper after the doctor had a blackout) that Netflix bought the rights for in 2019. However, 2019 seems to be where all the news about this ends. There is no other information on Wikipedia about this subject.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
2025 PDC World Darts Championship
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 00:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Deletion. The 2025 WC is not mentioned in the target article yet. The previous PDC Darts WC articles were created months before they started, when there was some official info about them.
ArtiK-99 (
talk) 16:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Recently created at
WP:AFC/R. My concerns regarding these redirects are the same as I
left as a comment there: judging from
this 2022 Variety article, I'm not sure that this is the same company - the fact that Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC is referenced in that article as a variation on the name of his earlier label, Getting Out Our Dreams makes me feel like this company might not be the same thing as
GOOD Music. If it isn't the same company, I worry that having this redirect might
cause confusion to our readers, by implying to those who are redirected from this term that this is a company name for the GOOD Music we have an article on (which, according to this RS, would seem to be incorrect). I'm not sure what the best thing to do here is, so bringing to RfD for more thoughts, but would lean in favour of deletion if a better solution can't be found. All the best, —a smart kitten[
meow 06:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A smart kitten I definitely didn’t do well for not telling you why I went ahead to accept the request even though I saw your comment. I actually did a bit of research and found some song releases where Kanye West was the artist and the label was “Getting Out Our Dreams” then at the copyright text, it was “Getting Out Our Dreams II LLC”. I’m currently mobile, I’d drop what I saw later.
Vanderwaalforces (
talk) 06:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Vanderwaalforces: Please feel free to link what you saw; however, I'm not sure if that would confirm them as being the same company - according to the Variety article, Kanye's contracts have been renegotiated more than once, meaning that it seems possible to me that the songs might have been released under
GOOD Music initially and the copyright later transferred to Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC. For example,
The Life of Pablo mentions that it was released through GOOD Music, but the Variety article states that [t]he copyright on all of his albums from 2016’s “Life of Pablo” album onward is credited to his company [GOOD II LLC]. I'll admit that this is quite a murky situation, though - the Variety article was the only RS I was able to find that mentioned GOOD II, and the company names being similar doesn't help! All the best —a smart kitten[
meow 07:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A smart kitten I got it now, hehe.
[1], go to the More information tab and you'll find "Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC" as one of the copyright holders. You will also agree with me that
[2] the direct album on Spotify also credits "Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC". This is sufficient for me to have accepted this redirect request.
Vanderwaalforces (
talk) 15:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Vanderwaalforces: With respect, I'm still not persuaded/convinced that these are the same company. I'm worried that inferring that GOOD II LLC is the same company as
GOOD Music based on an online store including both names in a product description is
WP:SYNTH; especially in the face of an
RS that directly refers to GOOD II LLC as a variation on the name of his earlier label GOOD Music. As I mentioned above, the copyrights might have been transferred since the album's initial release, which could have resulted in both companies being linked to an album despite being not being connected to each other. All the best, —a smart kitten[
meow 17:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A smart kitten I have no prejudice against deleting these redirects, I have no personal interest. Perhaps they should be deleted. You’re doing a great job, by the way.
Vanderwaalforces (
talk) 18:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
United Penn Bank
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The only mention of "United" comes from the United States. The only mention of "Penn" is within Pennsylvania. Besides that, no mention of "United Penn", or "Penn Bank" at the target article. Apparently might be a predecessor in the building, and the article is tagged with possibilities, but if this isn't mentioned at the target it may be better off to convert this into a red link to encourage article creation, if the possibility is indeed there. Utopes(talk / cont) 21:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak retarget to
Mellon Financial, where it is mentioned. I'm not opposed to deleting if others feel it would be better as a red link as the nominator suggests. -
Presidentmantalk ·
contribs (
Talkback) 14:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This seems like a good target. —
Ost (
talk) 21:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 05:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no further participation despite a relist. Jay 💬 10:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep as navigationally useful. The nickname is used by
WP:RS e.g.
[3] and it is plausible that someone not familiar with him or American sports in general might search the phrase based off something they see in sports media or just in a forum post where his actual name is not mentioned. Should be re-tagged with
Template:R from non-neutral name rather than
Template:R from alternative name.
Remember
WP:RNEUTRAL explicitly allows non-neutral but verifiable redirects, and states they should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. You declined to specify which part of
WP:RFD#DELETE applies which makes that hard to examine, but
WP:RFD#K3 certainly applies here. Redirects from pejorative nicknames are rather common actually. For example just from a quick scroll I see
His Fraudulency,
Big Yud,
Bastard brat,
Milk Snatcher,
Mark Uterus,
President Pooh,
Pootin,
Fredo Cuomo.
I don't know how likely it is for someone who doesn't follow the NBA to run across this, and someone who already follows the NBA will know who it refers to already, which is why my keep is weak here, but it seems plausible that will happen every so often.
2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B (
talk) 14:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any further thoughts? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 05:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Rape of Nancheng
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete: neither rape nor Nancheng are mentioned in the article, the term has virtually no views and I only found it when trying to find other articles known as 'Rape of X'. I did contact the creator of the redirect but he didn't respond
Traumnovelle (
talk) 03:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 05:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget per Presidentman.
Golem08 (
talk) 15:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget per Presidentman. --
Lenticel(
talk) 05:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 14:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
G-Men(Slang)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 14:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Not eligible for speedy due to being redirected as a result of a
previous AFD, nonetheless this is an unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history and no incoming links from mainspace.
2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A490:821A:272C:B909 (
talk) 03:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, especially considering no edit history at title.
Steel1943 (
talk) 16:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Strong delete it was at this title for a few days in 2006 and also has a capitalization error. Crouch, Swale (
talk) 18:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete due to malformed dabifier --
Lenticel(
talk) 08:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Cetian
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 00:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).