The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Same-sex marriage in Tenerife → Same-sex marriage in Spain  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Tenerife not mentioned in target. No reason to believe it is different from the rest of Spain. Rusalkii ( talk) 21:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep, for... exactly the reason you say to get rid of it, actually. If there's no reason to believe it's different from the rest of Spain, then someone looking for information on same-sex marriage in this city would be served well by being redirected to the article about the rest of Spain. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 04:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. Doesn't have great pageviews but I see no harm. 〜 Askarion ✉ 12:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. It does not help the reader to show that a page exists for Tenerife but have no information about it. Jay 💬 12:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 13:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 23:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Same-sex marriage in Aland → Same-sex marriage in Finland  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Alad not mentioned in target, I can't see any reason why it should be called out or why someone would expect same-sex marriage in Aland to be governed by different rules than the rest of Finland. Rusalkii ( talk) 21:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep, for... exactly the reason you say to get rid of it, actually. If there's no reason to believe it's different from the rest of Finland, then someone looking for information on same-sex marriage in this city would be served well by being redirected to the article about the rest of Finland.
  Wow, deja vu. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 04:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. It does not help the reader to show that a page exists for Aland but have no information about it. Jay 💬 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 13:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 23:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. Informing the reader in this very implicit fashion that it's the same as the rest of Finland could easily frustrate them, but in my opinion the benefits outweigh the downsides. Note also LGBT rights in Åland. J 947 ‡ ^edits 23:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Toggle the table of contents Scottish Westminster constituencies 2005 to 2024 → Scottish Westminster constituencies 2005 to 2024  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Redirect from a move to Scottish Westminster constituencies 2005 to 2024; this preceding title was an obvious mistake. Ham II ( talk) 14:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: "Toggle the table of contents" is obviously a copy-paste error. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 14:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete as G6: "Deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace, or redirects created by moving away from a title that was obviously unintended." as it existed at the mistaken name for less than a minute just a few days ago. (!voting here since I'm not a huge fan of tagging RFDs with speedy tags unless it's for a good reason). Skynxnex ( talk) 14:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Tagore (name) (disambiguation) → Tagore (disambiguation)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

With the lengthy list of name-holders now moved from Tagore (disambiguation) to Tagore (name), this doubly-disambiguated redirect should be deleted as confusing. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 12:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 12:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Argyle station (Ontario) → Kawartha Lakes  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There's no indication of why this redirects here Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

No idea what this redirect is supposed to be. I see nothing similar to a Argyle station near Kawartha Lake on Apple maps or Google search. Either is is something so small to not appear on a map, or this redirect is a mistake. Either way, Delete Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Doctor (Doctor Who). Jay 💬 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• The Doctors (Doctor Who) → Twice Upon a Time (Doctor Who)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose a disambiguation: While the episode was planned to be named "The Doctors," the redirect could potentially also mean any multi-Doctor episode due to its vague naming. I feel a disambiguation would clear up confusion with this redirect. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 02:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comment. @ Pokelego999: Which articles might otherwsie be called "The Doctors" (because a disambiguation page is a list of such articles)? Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  Likely other multi-Doctor stories (Namely things like The Three Doctors (Doctor Who), The Two Doctors, and the The Five Doctors, though there are more.) Many of them have similar titles to this one, and have a highly similar concept that could cause confusion. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 16:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comment it could also be referring to all the regenerations of the main character in the franchise, instead of an episode/serial -- 65.92.244.237 ( talk) 05:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to The Doctor (Doctor Who), which lists multiple doctors, and has a section on episodes featuring multiple doctors. BD2412 T 14:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to The Doctor (Doctor Who), contains information on all the doctors, including information on multi-doctor episodes. Fieari ( talk) 07:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Boston Incident → Boston Massacre  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This isn't commonly referred to as "Boston incident"; searching the term finds little about the massacre compared to other incidents (such as the 2007 Boston Mooninite panic). In the cases where the massacre is referred to with this term, it's only in a descriptive fashion and not as an actual name. Redirect was created by a quickly-reverted WP:POINTy page move in 2006. Elli ( talk | contribs) 02:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete one would think the Boston Tea Party or Battle of Bunker Hill would be better -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk) 03:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep - although it seems ambiguous (my first thought was the Boston Marathon bombing) the article on the Boston Massacre notes in the lede that the event is also known as the "Incident on King Street"; "Boston incident" is a plausible misremembering. It's a more neutral title anyway, the article also notes in the lede that calling it a "massacre" was American patriot propaganda. As far as I can tell, the other events listed here aren't widely known as named "incidents". If deleted then don't disambiguate, search results would handle this better. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep per Ivan. Queen of ♡ | Speak 20:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete I can't find a primary topic. GScholar results, for example, are split primarily between the current target and the Boston Marathon bombing. When referring to the current target, they seem to be mainly quoting from primary sources. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete seems to ambiguous/generic. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. Seems more specific to the massacre than the bombing. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 14:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete WP:NEO especially with the uppercase I. Jay 💬 14:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete as both incorrect and vague. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Category:Fictional musical instruments → Category:Fictional objects  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Misuse of category redirect. Merged per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_14#Category:Fictional_musical_instruments. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

@ LaundryPizza03: How is it a misuse? jlwoodwa ( talk) 23:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Procedural close as unclear nomination. Jay 💬 19:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• LaundryPizza03, what is your desired outcome? Deletion? -- BDD ( talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  Yes, I want to delete this because it is like redirecting " Category:Hindu temples in Mexico" to " Category:Religious buildings and structures in Mexico" as a placeholder for a presumed lack of Hindu temples with articles. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 19:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) J 947 ‡ ^edits 23:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Iranian nuclear scientist killed → Assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

the redirect is way too specific, and seems almost like a search engine query. Gaismagorm ( talk) 20:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Looks fair enough to me, since there have apparently been five Iranian nuclear scientists killed. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 15:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Bisexuality. Jay 💬 14:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Ambosexual → Ambisexual  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Ambisexuality → Ambisexuality  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Amphisexual → Amphisexual  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Ambisexual → Ambisexual  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Since @ Smasongarrison: commented in my talk page, ambisexual(ity) and bisexual(ity) are synonyms and it should be retargeted there, along with the others which are translations from Greek and Esperanto. -- MikutoH ^talk! 00:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Support in principle, but these should all be retargeted to bisexuality or an existing page, not a other redirects. Mason ( talk) 00:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

That's what I meant. Retarget to bisexuality. Also just listed ambisexual. -- MikutoH ^talk! 23:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 14:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Battle of Muscle Shoals → Battle of Decatur  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Muscle Shoals, Alabama is mentioned at target, but a battle there is not described. This does not seem to be a term in use. There is evidence for a skirmish at Mussel (sic) Shoals on October 30, 1864 1, but there is no content on enwiki about it and no evidence it is referred to as "Battle of Muscle Shoals". Delete to encourage article creation if notable and avoid confusion/astonishment. Mdewman6 ( talk) 00:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Intersex. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Intersex man → Intersex  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Intersex woman → Woman#Intersex women  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Intersex women → Woman#Intersex women  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Shouldn't they have equivalent targets ( Intersex man to Man#Sexuality and gender xor Intersex woman to Intersex) {xor meaning exclusive or}. -- MikutoH ^talk! 00:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Retarget both to Intersex for consistency and as the more precise topic than Man/Woman, especially since there isn't an equivalent Man#Intersex man anchor. Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 15:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Agree with Chaotic. Jay 💬 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).