The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Horror-Core → Horrorcore  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Was created as a duplicate of article Horrorcore but couldn't find any sources (checked Ngram and Scholar too) for this spelling. Killarnee ( talk) 22:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep - redirects are cheap, unambigious where it's intending to go. If the redirect existed in the first place then the user wouldn't have gone to the trouble of trying to create a duplicate article. BugGhost 🪲👻 13:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep, plausible spelling variant that a reader could search for. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 14:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep as plausible spelling variant. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 06:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep - reasonable variant. —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 22:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• 2022 United Kingdom government formation → Truss ministry  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The page to which this page redirects mentions nothing about any formation. So this redirect is at this moment misleading. Dajasj ( talk) 15:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: also ambiguous with the formation of the Sunak ministry. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Ambiguous between the Truss and Sunak ministries but not worth a disambig page. The search engine is well equipped to handle phrases like this. Glades12 ( talk) 06:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per arguments above BugGhost 🪲👻 13:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 06:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Men in the Philippines → Filipinos  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Doesn't look like a good redirect. Could not find other countries redirecting "Men in (country)" to their respective citizens and/or nationals. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 14:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep Several pageviews per month (600+ in the last year), and I can't find a better target. Appears to be useful. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 00:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  Actually, Ca makes a good point about the current target. Delete. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 23:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete to encourage article creation. Per WP:R#DELETE #10, the current target provides no information about men in philippines in particular, only as a people. Deleting would encourage article creation for the counterpart of Women in the Philippines.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per Ca. The topic is relevant and likely notable, so having a red link is better than sending the reader to a much wider topic that doesn't mention it in detail. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 14:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:REDLINK -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 06:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 03:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus → Pituophis melanoleucus  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The subspecies of P. m. melanoleucus is distinct from P. melanoleucus; for example, see P. melanoleucus's range vs. P. m. melanoleucus's range. As a result it is harmful to have a redirect from one to the other; this would imply that they are the same. ReadItAlready ( talk) 13:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep as the Pituophis melanoleucus article is currently the best place to direct readers for information on P. melanoleucus ssp. melanoleucus. It distinguishes the subspecies of this snake and even describes differences in the ranges of the subspecies. ― Syn path 03:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep as a redirect from a subspecies. P. m. melanoleucus is included in P. melanoleucus, therefore it makes sense to redirect the former to the latter. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep and tag as {{ R from subspecies to species}}, or may be not tag since the template redirects to {{ R from subtopic}} with which the redirect is already tagged. Jay 💬 20:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Zine Tseng → 3 Body Problem (TV series)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

WP:RDEL#10. This redirect was created by an indef blocked user, and does not link to any article. The subject person has already landed a main role in a high-profile Netflix series and had multiple personal interviews, which suggests the article currently meets GNG on the borderline and once they receive another notable role, they will likely pass NACTOR as well. The subject person is very likely to warrant an independent article, while 3 Body Problem (TV series), a project they were involved in, has zero coverage of their life or career. Therefore, I think this redirect does not have a reason to exist and should be deleted per WP:RDEL. Prince of Erebor（ The Book of Mazarbul） 10:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 09:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Vllatava River → Vltava  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Multiple typos, implausible typo of plausible misspelling "Vlatava", unused, nonsense for native speaker, also "Vllatava" not found by global search. Should be deleted. — Mykhal ( talk) 09:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

(Well, nonsense for native speaker subreason might be somewhat misleading, as the word Vltava itself does not have (other) meaning in current Czech, too.) — Mykhal ( talk) 09:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete, per nom. BugGhost 🪲👻 13:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 06:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to BoBoiBoy Movie 2. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• BoBoiBoy Galaxy: The Movie → BoBoiBoy Galaxy  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There's no movie titled "BoBoiBoy Galaxy: The Movie". M S Hassan ( talk) 08:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Retarget to BoBoiBoy: The Movie BugGhost 🪲👻 13:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

There's no such thing as "BoBoiBoy Galaxy: The Movie", redirecting it to BoBoiBoy: The Movie is pointless. M S Hassan ( talk) 09:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

There's no such thing as "BoBoiBoy Galaxy: The Movie" - I am aware - I am not suggesting creating an article with that title. I am suggesting a redirect to a different article because it is very likely where the user is attempting to go to - it is not pointless. BugGhost 🪲👻 13:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Updating my !vote: Support redirecting to BoBoiBoy Movie 2, Lunamann makes a good point BugGhost 🪲👻 11:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Retarget to BoBoiBoy Movie 2. The BoBoiBoy franchise is split between the first TV series, simply titled BoBoiBoy, and the second series, titled BoBoiBoy Galaxy. While the first BoBoiBoy movie-- BoBoiBoy: The Movie-- came out right between and was meant to be a chronological bridge between the two series (and notably has a logo quite similar to the Galaxy logo, which does lend the idea that someone could slap the Galaxy moniker on it), BoBoiBoy Movie 2 came out during BoBoiBoy Galaxy, between its first and second seasons. If any movie gets to be "BoBoiBoy Galaxy: The Movie", I believe it's BoBoiBoy Movie 2. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 11:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

(Also, for the record, I'm not terribly opposed to retargeting to BoBoiBoy: The Movie-- as stated, it immediately preceded BoBoiBoy Galaxy and its logo does resemble Galaxy's logo more than the original series's logo-- and more than Movie 2's logo does, ironically enough. If everyone else believes that to be a better target, I'm not going to put up much fight.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 15:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Retarget to BoBoiBoy Movie 2, being the movie that came out during the Galaxy TV show run. Fieari ( talk) 23:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).