This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 9, 2024.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
00:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Not a helpful search term, no mention at target, and not likely to be a typo for somebody searching for World War III.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
19:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- the best argument i can think of is 5 being right over 2 in most pads. still not a typo you'd make without noticing. delete as implausible
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
19:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Keep:Delete: The primary reason for keeping these redirects in general would be the quote about World War V mentioned in the discussion linked to later in this comment. However, that quote seems to have since been removed from the article about
World War III. Original: I created this redirect because
World War V and
Fifth World War already existed. If you were to propose deleting all of these redirects, then I would reconsider, but I think that keeping those while deleting
World War 5 would be quite inconsistent. For reference, a similar discussion took place around "World War VI":
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 October 26#World War VI. –
Gluonz
talk
contribs
19:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC); edited 14:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I bundled in other redirects you've found. I don't think josh was suggesting that we only delete
World War 5, but just haven't found the other similar redirects.
Ca
talk to me!
13:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- and delete them too, for the same reason
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
14:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ca: I have also found
5th World War (which currently redirects to
World war#Potential Third World War) and
Ww5 (which currently redirects to
World war#Subsequent world wars). –
Gluonz
talk
contribs
21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Done
Ca
talk to me!
11:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete No mention of WW5 in the article, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
Ca
talk to me!
13:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural, four out of five redirects were not tagged for discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22#Scared Silly
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit
23:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Delete. The
Snuffleupagus redirect already exists, but
Mr. Snuffleupagas doesn't, and creating it just to justify the Snuffleupagas redirect may run the risk of reinforcing this particular misspelling. If a reader looking to read about Snuffy types "snuffleu" into the search bar, Snuffleupagus should be what appears in the resulting list, not the redundant Snuffleupagas. –
MrPersonHumanGuy (
talk)
22:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Chhota Bheem 2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Jay
💬
15:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
not entirely sure what makes this halberd that's only mentioned in passing in the target "the", as opposed to
the weapon
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
20:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. I don't find this vague-- searching for The Halberd on Google turns up two classes results-- the weapon and its existence both irl and in various video games like Elden Ring or Dark Souls (it may be capitalized in such links but it's literally just *a* halberd in those instances), and this fictional battleship and its appearances in the Kirby series and the Super Smash Bros series. (That doesn't count as two separate ships-- the Smash one is intended to *be* the Kirby one.)
WP:DIFFCAPS is enough to establish that someone searching for "The Halberd" is probably not wanting to go to
halberd the weapon, if the leading The wasn't a tip-off already. As for target, anyone looking for information on the Kirby Halberd is well-served by this redirect, which takes you to information on the ship's owner and main resident, and has information on the battleship itself.
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk)
03:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Ammonium bituminosulfonate.
(non-admin closure)
asilvering (
talk)
04:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
this one, i don't understand. ichtyol seems to be either a type of medicine (or chemical?), a misspelling(?) of "ichthyol", which seems to be a fossil fish oil, or a brand of shampoo. none of those seem to be related to shiitake mushrooms. is there something i'm missing?
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
15:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
20:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- mhm, retarget
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
11:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
WP:CHEAP wins the day.
(non-admin closure)
asilvering (
talk)
04:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
implausible misspelling of "mushroom"? at the very best, i think someone could potentially mishear the "u" depending on the speaker's accent, but that doesn't seem very likely, and u and a are almost on opposite sides of the keyboard
cogsan
(nag me)
(stalk me)
15:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Weak Keep - I'm calling this a potentially plausible search based on the fact that the Japanese pronunciation of "mushroom" is マシュルム, which would be transliterated "mashurūmu" but when spoken aloud sounds like "mashroom" (two of the "u"s are nigh-unvoiced). This is only relevant because "shiitake" is Japanese to begin with. The thing that makes it a stretch is that マシュルム, in Japanese, does not refer to shiitake, but only to (western style)
button mushrooms... so I'll leave this as a weak !vote. Eh, redirects are
WP:CHEAP anyway.
Fieari (
talk)
03:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete.
Mashroom doesn't exist.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
21:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
20:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Strengthening my !vote above per your reference that this misspelling is attested in reliable sources related to the subject.
Fieari (
talk)
04:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17#Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17#Saint John Rivers
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17#Super Nintend
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney(Episodes)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17#Your Mileage May Vary
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#Brown hat
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#The two Johns
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17#This Might Be A Wiki
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#Pignas
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
11:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Proposing to Delete. Reiterating my rationale at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15#Line 1 (Singapore MRT). These lines have never been referred to as Line 4, Line 5, etc, but rather directly by their names (Circle MRT line, Downtown MRT line etc). A quick Google search brings up the line numbers in order of their opening (For example, when I search for "Line 5 Singapore MRT", Google brings up Downtown MRT line, which was the fifth line to open in SG, as the first result). Given this, I find it to be an inaccurate search term at best, and if I were to go further, an invalid search term.
S5A-0043
Talk
07:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirects were not tagged for RfD. Just did that.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
09:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Notorious Software Patents
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#Notorious Software Patents
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#Acoustic punk
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 16#Moscow City