This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 16, 2024.
Watch channel
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Draft:Windows 8.25
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
DSRL
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Entire (animal)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Was BLAR'd after a discussion held not on its own talk page, not on AfD, but on the talk page of
Neutering, at the tail end of a merge discussion that only ever got a single vote for "Yeah no, don't merge, just delete "Entire (animal)" as it'd only ever been a
WP:DICDEF."
Keep: and remove {{R to article without mention}}, unless I'm misreading the lead of the article or what it is you're proposing isn't delete.
Neutering currently (and has for a few years) ends the lead paragraph with An animal that has not been neutered is sometimes referred to as entire or intact. So a normal redirect from a related term to our best coverage (with predictable disambiguation in this case). As an aside, I think clear antonyms and synonyms don't always need a mention to be useful redirects.
Skynxnex (
talk)
02:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Sam Malone (DJ)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Sam Malone no longer works for KSEV and I am not sure if there is enough to put together a standalone article for him or his current self-produced show.
spryde |
talk20:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
2012: Doomsday
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The F-Bomb (documentary)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Related meme not mentioned at target. Implausible to be searched on Wikipedia, not including people going onto Google and asking "what's the beach that makes you old", after which point one would find the source film for the topic; also, the Wikipedia page pops up there too. Utopes(talk / cont)17:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Even as a meme, there is no mention of the meme on the film article, so this is just a joke re-direct that doesn't really help anyone.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
15:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Paradise Airport
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in
Paradise, California, nowhere near
Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk)
13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as potentially confusing, per
WP:R#DELETE item 2. As well as the California "Paradise airport" indicated by the nom
[1], there's another in New York state
[2], but neither seem to be notable.
Rosbif73 (
talk)
14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Paradise Skypark on which we have an article. It is unclear from the nomination which is the airport article being referred to that was converted to a redirect in 2022. Jay 💬15:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact.
Hildeoc (
talk)
12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. My first thought is that a fallacy is only one type of faulty thinking, others being using incorrect logic, extrapolating from a misunderstanding, etc.
Thryduulf (
talk)
15:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Questionthis is actually a psychological term Can you provide a source defining this psychological term? The only uses I could find were all literal uses, i. e. talking about thinking that is faulty. Thinking is more general than
reasoning/
arguing, and from what I've seen, a case could be made to target
cognitive biases instead, or in addition. Paradoctor (
talk)
17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Paradoctor: Thanks for taking an interest. Well, if you google the term (using quotes), the hits you get are like almost exclusively related to uses in a psychological context; cf., e.g.,
here.
Hildeoc (
talk)
05:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
two [...] conceptions of faulty thinking That's two different terms. So we'd need to a) disambiguate, b) find articles to link to, which are defining these idioms. Alternatively a set index article would also be conceivable, though this would require a whole lot more sources.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Poopoo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep. Plausible redirect. It's basically the same title as the target, but without the spacing in the middle. Unclear why it doesn't make sense to the nominator.
CycloneYoristalk!08:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep as a plausible (and perhaps common) alternate spelling. The fact that it points to a dab page doesn't matter for this purpose.
Dennis Brown -
2¢11:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Immigration control in Russia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The immigration control is not illegal immigration, but the fight against it (among other things), my first choice is therefore keep. If this is a no-go for some reason, then dabify it per Lunamann. --
Викидим (
talk)
21:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Dabify or retarget? If dabify, anyone want to draft a dab up? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
12:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk page of the suggested targets Illegal immigration to Russia and Main Directorate for Migration Affairs. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬06:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Main Directorate for Migration Affairs. No need to dabify: this is a single subject regardless agencies and articles where else it is covered. I added a lazy section "History", from which one can traced down all previous Russian migration control agencies, as well as "See also" about immigration to Russia. -
Altenmann>talk06:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Pepitos
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retarget to
Pumpkin seed, with {{
R from avoided double redirect|Pepita}} and {{
R from misspelling}}Restore to original redirect form: #REDIRECT [[Pepita]] {{R from misspelling}}. This is an obvious and easy typo for pepita, that could be made by anyone with imperfect memory of the word and uncertain of the linguistic gender of the Spanish name (which is commonly used at least in the southern and western United States for roasted pumpkin/squash seeds, even if not widely used in English more broadly). If I had noticed the strange change to redirect this to a cookie brand for no source-supported reason (and an edit-summary reason that suggests it is a re-branding trademark of that specific product line but used only in a particular Spanish-speaking country, not within the Anglosphere), I would have reverted it. —
SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC); revised to fix post-merge error. 21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
There's already a disambiguation page at
Pepito. There are very few items on that page that could be pluralized, though, so targeting the nominated page there may not be appropriate. -
Eureka Lott14:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Dale Becker
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep (arguably almost should be moved to Dale Becker but that's a distinct discussion). Additional sources that use just the middle name:
[3],
[4], and
[5] (definitely seem to be the same person).
Skynxnex (
talk)
16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).