This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 18, 2023.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29#Amtryptamine
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Pax Russica
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination.
Jay
💬
06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not an alternative name for the target, not mentioned anywhere on enwiki. Delete.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
22:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#TI-001
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
06:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
This redirect is unhelpful for anyone looking up information about Samal, as her name is included only once as part of the cast list. Samal has since starred in the
The Great and worked as a writer for
Gangs of London and the upcoming
Bodies. It's possible she'll have her own article in the future, but this isn't a particularly helpful placeholder in the meantime.
Sock
(tock talk)
15:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I’m not nearly as familiar with notability guidelines as I’d like to be, but if there’s no particularly great target for a redirect, & Danusia Samal passes
WP:NACTOR, it’s possible the redirect could be converted to a stub article to avoid deletion. If you look at the last three months, the redirect has been getting
pageviews, which shows that it is being used. (Obviously, though, pageviews on their own don’t solve the problem of finding an appropriate target.) Best,
user:A smart kitten
meow
20:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per reason 10: "the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject."
Tevildo (
talk)
06:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RFD#D10/
WP:REDYES or create an article over the redirect if possible.
InterstellarGamer12321 (
talk |
contribs)
06:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
18:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
Please delete these redirects. The target section for these redirects no longer exists in their target article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.209.40.250 (
talk)
14:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Less bureaucracy, please. I see no reason to delete, and no better redirect candidate. Just leave it alone until the next film is announced.
cagliost (
talk)
15:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Refine to
Production of the James Bond films#Future. I have restored a version of the section these used to target before an unsourced addition led to its complete removal.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
22:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - This has been restored.
2607:FEA8:761F:4600:8842:12C2:18AE:5321 (
talk)
00:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Weak delete: I think that looking for a new actor to play James Bond is a relatively strong sign there will be a 26th Bond movie, but it's not even in pre-production yet it seems, so I think the redirects are just slightly leaning too
WP:CRYSTAL for me. Support recreation upon any further confirmation of a 26th Bond film.
Tartar
Torte
01:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep (though I have reinstated the deletion tags after premature removal) - I think it's likely that a user may search for these looking to see what the status of any forthcoming film was likely to be. In my opinion this does not contravene CRYSTAL, as there is a sourced reference in the target section. —
Voice of Clam (
talk)
09:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep is mentioned in the target article and is a plausible search term. The fact the film hasn't entered pre-production doesn't mean it's inappropriate for Wikipedia, and even if the Bond film series were to be cancelled there would undoubtedly be quite a bit of coverage of that in one of the relevant articles. It is common practice to include information about potential future franchise films in the article about the franchise.
Hut 8.5
18:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep, as the section now exists again and will presumably become more developed over time as more information is published about the subject. Even if the film doesn’t make it to production, I can plausibly see a section in an article that describes how the 26th Bond film wasn’t created - which I feel would also be a plausible target for this redirect (for people wanting to find out what happened to the presumed upcoming film). Best,
user:A smart kitten
meow
11:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
List of LGBT rights activists.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
18:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
I’m nominating this redirect separately than those under
§ LGBT activist as it’s the only one I could
find that used the plural activists instead of the singular activist. I’m taking it to RfD along with the activist-singular redirects (1) for consistency, and (2) as I believe, as it uses the plural form,
List of LGBT rights activists could be a better target potentially.
user:A smart kitten
meow
10:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- As I said below, I agree that
List of LGBT rights activists is the most appropriate target.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
11:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Common target with the others, breaking one off for singular vs plural seems like it just creates potential confusion.
Darker Dreams (
talk)
12:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I agree with QuietHere -
List of LGBT rights activists should be the target for all of these.
SatyrTN (
talk /
contribs)
15:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Ditto. –
GnocchiFan (
talk)
15:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget all to
List of LGBT rights activists and keep those that already target there.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
These all seem (to me at least) like they should point to a common target. I’m therefore opening this RfD discussion to determine the best common target for these redirects. All the best,
user:A smart kitten
meow
10:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- As the creator of
LGBTQ rights activist, it is my opinion that
List of LGBT rights activists is the most appropriate target for all of them because "activist" clearly denotes a person and so I would expect the term to lead me to a page specifically about people.
- Also, per the {{
RfD}} template's presence on it, it appears that
LGBT activists is also part of this discussion and should be added to the list.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
11:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I wrote that last part before noticing the separate discussion above. Personally, I don't see the point in separating them; if it were the difference between "activist" and "activism" then it would make more sense, but in this case I think they're essentially performing the same task.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
11:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I also agree that
List of LGBT rights activists is the best redirect. –
GnocchiFan (
talk)
15:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
09:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at target and no mention on Russian-language Wikipedia. Search engines do not talk about the topic of the article when you search "Война Слава".
ArcticSeeress (
talk)
09:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Wikipedia community.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
Main to projectspace XNR - not likely to be used by general readers.
#prodraxis
connect
04:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: this was previously (2016–2019) a redirect to
Wikipedia community. Best,
user:A smart kitten
meow
10:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
Delete Not mentioned at
Wikipedia community, I concur that the current target doesn't deserve a cross-namespace redirect.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to
Wikipedia community. I have added the relevant content. Every Wikipedia user talk page now has a "Wikilove" tab at the top, and it would be surprising if there was not coverage in sources of this phenomenon.
BD2412
T
00:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Wikipedia community per BD2412's improvement of the target article. --
Lenticel (
talk)
04:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as a completely unambiguous redirect. I'd imagine there are many users who link to it in internal Wikipedia discussions, and very few people who unintentionally find it. Anyone who does, for example, see the term used in an off-wiki news site would probably learn more from seeing the project page than seeing the Wikipedia community article.
Red
Panda
25
18:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget as standard with Wikipedia terms that we have articles that cover them.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
19:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Wikipedia community per BD2412.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Wikipedia community per BD2412: stops the
WP:CNR issue.
InterstellarGamer12321 (
talk |
contribs)
06:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Wikipedia community per BD2412:
OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her)
Questions?
03:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Wikipedia:Wrong