This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 19, 2023.
Kadisha Martina
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Just as the above, this redirect is linked to a wrong article; a footballer page being redirected to a school. Should remain in red link. Jõséhola06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - Currently, nearly every entry at
Curaçao women's national football team#Current squad is a redlink. Alternately, perhaps those redlinks should be removed and everyone redirected to that section, but I'm not familiar enough with the topic to make that call. It would seem a bit odd for the captain to be a less-notable member of the team, however. signed, Rosguilltalk20:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Black up
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose but support adding a hatnote to the target. DuckDuckGo search for "black up" gives the album as #1, then a brand of makeup and other cosmetics from various companies. Google gives the makeup, the album at #8 and the term related to blackface at #12. Bing mostly gives the makeup, although somehow
Adobe Photoeditor got in.
Edward-Woodrow (
talk)
19:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep it's only not used in the article because the nominator keeps changing the spelling of book titles and quotations. It's a legitimate spelling used in reliable sources.
Ealdgyth (
talk)
13:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
If the space was the only issue, I'd be inclined to keep it. However, given the only Google hits are Wikipedia or mirrors thereof, I would say weak delete per nom due to the spelling.
Edward-Woodrow (
talk)
18:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Pouring
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I was very surprised to end up at an article about an ancient Greek festival when using this search term while researching the
🫗 (pouring liquid) redirect below. At least this should be refined to
Anthesteria#Choes where "The pouring" is mentioned, with a hatnote to disambiguation, but I'm wondering whether the disambiguation should be primary and whether it should be a separate
Pouring (disambiguation) or part of an expanded
Pour (disambiguation)?
Thryduulf (
talk)
09:56, 10 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate? (And if the latter, how should it be carried out?) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
05:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Not sure what there is to disambiguate here.
Decantation looks like the only possible option, and to be honest I can't imagine that many people searching for "pouring" will find what they are looking for there. I'd be inclined to delete, honestly
Caeciliusinhorto-public (
talk)
08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment there's really no ambiguity: the clear
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of "pouring" is the act of tilting a container filled with liquid or powder, to cause its contents to flow out. This is an encyclopedic topic with at least two major aspects to it: the fluid dynamics/
flowability part (subtopics of which are addressed in
decantation and
teapot effect), and the cultural part (expectations about who pours, what kind of a container is poured from and into, how you move the container/your hands/the rest of your body while pouring, etc.). Also given
WP:GERUND that topic probably really does belong at the title
pouring (compare e.g. the recently-created
sending). As such I've started
Draft:Pouring but it's not really ready for mainspace at the moment.
59.149.117.119 (
talk)
04:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Thank you for creating that draft. When it's ready for mainspace moving it over this redirect would I think be the optimal solution.
Thryduulf (
talk)
09:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The draft is more appropriate for the meaning of "pour". When I think "pouring", I think of heavy rain, covered at
Rain#Intensity, however there is no mention of the word "pouring" there. Jay 💬06:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist — move draft over redirect, delete, or disambiguate? And what do editors feel is the
primary topic for the term? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
00:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).