This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 2, 2023.
Alemanya
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs)
06:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
per
WP:RLANG, "Alemanya" is just Germany in Catalan and Filipino.
greyzxq
talk
22:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Per OP.
Pax Brittanica (
talk)
23:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as mentioned – it has quite the affinity to a target that lists the
Names of Germany in various languages!
J947 †
edits
23:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- If you look at
WP:RLANG, these should be deleted. What connection does Germany have to Catalan and Filipino?
greyzxq
talk
06:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- As I said, this name has a big connection to
Names of Germany.
J947 †
edits
07:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- It doesn't really… we don't have redirects from
País del Mig to
Names of China, which I believe is the only other article which actually says the names of the country in loads of different languages. The only connection is that it means Germany, and if this redirect is okay shouldn't every name for Germany in each language redirect to this article? But that goes against
WP:RLANG, which was my original reason for deletion.
greyzxq
talk
00:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Many more redirects should exist than do – non-existence of redirects for similar terms is not an accurate barometer of usefulness in the slightest. To the second sentence: yes, quite right, other redirects should be created. This redirect does not fall afoul of RLOTE – read through that page's rationale and please explain how any of that applies to redirects to a Names of article.
J947 †
edits
04:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- keep per J947.
CapitalSasha ~
talk
11:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RLANG. The keep case is even weaker here than the one below. (
t ·
c)
buidhe
14:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per J947 and
K3. -
Presidentman
talk ·
contribs (
Talkback)
16:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Nemecko
Repetitive designation
History of Porin Ässät
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#History of Porin Ässät
Sky High 2
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Sky High 2
HDMS Indfødsretten (1887)
Wake up filthy
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Wake up filthy
Wind power in Europe
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Wind power in Europe
Boston town meeting
Type E
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
E-Type.
✗
plicit
23:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
E-Type (a disambiguation page). Rather than primarily being a particular model of sports car produced by Audi
c. 1912–1923, 'Type E' could refer to various topics, such as the
Type E power plug and socket used in France, which is a topic more familiar to the general public. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
17:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per nom.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
17:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- See also
Type A,
Type B,
Type C,
Type D,
Type F (newly created by me, not disambiguated!),
Type G (currently a red link),
Type H (currently a red link),
Type I,
Type J, etc. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per nom as evidently ambiguous. I'd do the same for all the similar redirects matching
Type ([A-Z])
→$1-Type
. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
19:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
I'm Unhappy
2018–2020 Irish anti-immigration protests
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#2018–2020 Irish anti-immigration protests
Ayesha Erotica
Parc Felindre
Wikipedia:Zombie portals
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
The target page doesn't describe this content at all, so it must be deleted.
Q
𝟤
𝟪
10:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as
G8, at least for now. It appears that the references to
zombie pages and zombie portals were removed from the glossary, which has left this redirect as a redirect to nowhere. This entry may not be necessary because the zombie portals, or at least most of them, were successfully destroyed in the Great Portal Wars of 2019, but with considerable
collateral damage (because war is a tragic bloody activity). Either the glossary entry should be restored, or the redirect should be deleted, and the glossary entry may refer to an extinct subspecies and so may not be needed.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
16:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
2022 New York City Subway massacre
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
10:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
A "massacre" without any deaths, term not in use for this event.
Fram (
talk)
09:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Brooklyn Subway massacre redirects to the same and should also be deleted.
Fram (
talk)
09:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete: per nom, also delete Brooklyn Subway massacre
greyzxq
talk
23:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom (maybe even speedy delete per
R3, since these redirects are only a few days old).
Duckmather (
talk)
14:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - both links are technically incorrect because no one was killed, so at best this is misleading. However, the redirects were also recently created, so I agree that these qualify for speedy deletion under R3. Had the pages been created shortly after the attack, it would have been reasonable to have these redirects because it wasn't yet known whether anyone had died. But this is more than a year out, when we know no one was killed, and every victim has long since been discharged from the hospital. –
Epicgenius (
talk)
22:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
YouTube headquarters massacre
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#YouTube headquarters massacre
Chemical scaffold
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination.
Jay
💬
10:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
N Delete.
"Chemical scaffold" is not mentioned anywhere in the target article. It is a redirect with possibilities, but cannot have a target article yet because
scaffold (chemistry) has yet to be created. —
CrafterNova
[ TALK ]
[ CONT ]
09:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Oscarrak 2023
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
07:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
No mention of this title on the subject article.
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk)
05:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RLOTE. In general, I don't have a strong opinion on non-English redirects, and in some cases I think they can be useful. This redirect, on the other hand, is a clear-cut case, as the event has nothing to do with Basque.
Dsuke1998AEOS (
talk)
14:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Weapon System Safety
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Weapon System Safety
A List Of Indian Chef
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on
minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired
PROD (a.k.a.
"soft deletion"). Editors can
request the article's undeletion.
✗
plicit
07:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
The "A List Of" in the title left over from a March 2015 move may or may not be helpful to people, but the singular form in the redirect makes this implausible (also, it hasn't gotten very many pageviews since July that same year). Not sure how it's still useful. Regards,
SONIC
678
05:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Toho Eiga
Argentina vs France
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
I'm sure Argentina have played France many other times - and not just in football...!! Better to be disambiguated than redirected, but deletion is just as easy I guess
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk)
05:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Disagree. Under
WP:R, one of the purposes of redirects is "less specific forms of names, for which the article subject is still the primary topic". This is the same reason why
Obama redirects to
Barack Obama (despite there being many people named Obama),
Croatia vs France redirects to
2018 FIFA World Cup final (despite France vs Croatia having played in other games), and
7-1 redirects to
Brazil v Germany (2014 FIFA World Cup) (despite other games, both in soccer and other sports, having ended with a scoreline of 7-1). Given these examples, and the fact that the 2022 World Cup final is the most notable game between Argentina and France, I think that the redirect is good to stay.
4hrue2kd83f (
talk)
14:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose. The only other articles on Argentina–France competition that I can find are
1960 France rugby union tour of Argentina and Uruguay,
1998 France rugby union tour of Argentina and Fiji, and
1985 France rugby union tour of Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. Three other Argentina–France football matches get sections in larger articles:
2018 FIFA World Cup knockout stage#France vs Argentina,
1930 FIFA World Cup Group 1#Argentina vs France, and
1978 FIFA World Cup Group 1#Argentina vs France. All six of these articles combined get
a tenth of the views that the 2022 game gets. This is the clear primary topic; if there were a disambiguation page it could be linked in a hatnote.
Caeciliusinhorto-public (
talk)
14:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Get On The Dancefloor
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Get on the Dance Floor. No consensus to disambiguate, so retargeting per
WP:NCRET.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
00:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
I'm a bit lost on how to fix this issue. For one, the properly capitalized version of this redirect, assuming title case,
Get on the Dancefloor, does not exist. However, there is an article at
Get on the Dance Floor. Due to the fact this redirect is a subtitle-ish
WP:PTM of its target, I'm not really sure if the ultimate solution here is "keep", "delete", or "retarget to
Get on the Dance Floor". Right now, my thought is weak retarget to
Get on the Dance Floor, but will yield to any convincing arguments against this stance.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Disambiguate This is not a PTM, and there is no obvious
WP:PTOPIC. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
11:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Friendly Arm Inn
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Friendly Arm Inn
Arbitration clauses and class action waivers
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 11#Arbitration clauses and class action waivers
The Important Steps of the American History
Kylie Sasse
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
07:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Implausible redirect. Minogue never married actor
Joshua Sasse, and their engagement only lasted for about a year before calling it quits in 2017.
CycloneYoris
talk!
04:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete The time to create this redirect would've been if Ms. Minogue did change her name (which...why would she?! She'd remove her last name before taking someone else's!), not on spec a year before the fact that never occurred.
Nate • (
chatter)
16:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Patrick sugrue
NJPlates
Alternative '80
Murder by abuse or neglect
College of Information and Computer Sciences
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#College of Information and Computer Sciences
Disannexation
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Disannexation
Saskatoon Chief Mistawasis
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
J947 †
edits
23:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Google hits are all about a bridge, not about an electoral district.
CapitalSasha ~
talk
02:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Hi. Canadian electoral districts have names instead of numbers (unlike the USA). Saskatchewan has finished redistributing (redistricting) the districts for the provincial legislature after the 2021 census. As part of this reconfiguration, the current district of
Saskatoon Northwest is being renamed Saskatoon Chief Mistawasis. You can look at the maps on the boundary commission's website.
https://www.saskboundaries.ca/maps/
- I am preparing these new articles ahead of time for the roughly ten to-be-renamed districts in the province, and am setting them to be redirected to the current article...this way those searching for the new names now are redirected to the correct article under the current names, and not just given a 'not found' error. In the coming weeks/months, I will be updating all the articles to reference these upcoming changes including the new names.
- When the next election is called (which is when the new boundaries and names will take effect), I will migrate the content for the districts being renamed from the old article to the new article, and then will redirect the will-be-old name to the new (and will-be-current) name.
- Let me know if any other questions.
- Thanks!
Brycecordry (
talk)
02:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I see, thanks. Is this really a "renaming" of the electoral district? Looking at the maps it seems that the new district will include area from several current districts.
CapitalSasha ~
talk
11:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- If you compare the changes as I have, about 90% of the area that’s in Saskatoon Northwest right now remains in the Chief Mistawasis riding, and it just gains some largely undeveloped territory from Saskatoon Silverspring-Sutherland and Saskatoon Willowgrove, similar to how other electoral districts gain and lose territory from redistribution. Also all districts in Saskatchewan are gaining population due to record population growth over the last decade. It no longer makes sense to call it Saskatoon Northwest because it will now pull in the northeast corner of Saskatoon, but in principle it’s the same riding, just new/expanded boundaries. Same thing could be said for Regina Mount Royal being a renamed/expanded Regina Rosemont, but I’m still debating on how to handle that one.
Brycecordry (
talk)
19:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
McDonald's stabbing
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#McDonald's stabbing
Twotopia
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Twotopia
El Paso genocide
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
03:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
No Google hits for this term, seems unlikely that this is a real term people use for this event.
CapitalSasha ~
talk
01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Buffalo genocide
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
03:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Google hits all refer to killing of bison, not of this mass shooting.
CapitalSasha ~
talk
01:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Bell yoke
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Bell yoke
Experimetn
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
I don't think this is a very plausible or significant typo. However, it's definitely not patent nonsense (I declined a
WP:CSD#G1 tagging), and since it has existed for three months, I believe it's too old to delete as
WP:CSD#R3.
Complex/
Rational
00:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Partition of Yugoslavia
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9#Partition of Yugoslavia