This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 13, 2023.
"(Raimi-Verse)" as a disambiguator
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget/refine. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
"
Raimi-Verse" doesn't exist, leaving no expectation that this redirect is either helpful or plausible.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete all, or retarget and refine?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards,
SONIC
678
23:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
Human shit was also created by
Mclay1.
(non-admin closure)
EpicPupper (
talk)
21:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Yes, this vulgarity is used to describe feces, but when describing human feces itself, we usually do not say it like that. Also, this page under another capitalization,
Human shit, is already deleted, so I'm suggesting a deletion of this too. The page is currently fully protected so I'm not able to add a RfD template. Since the reason of its protection was because of persistent vandalism, I'm also suggesting a salting too to prevent recreation by vandals.
Colgatepony234 (
talk)
23:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep: The history on all of this is an absolute doozy. It seems like
Human shit was deleted because someone moved
Human feces to there and it was moved back, but the redirect was left over then deleted, but seemingly not with prejudice as to the appropriateness of the redirect. It was determined that this redirect,
Human Shit target
Human feces after a set of AfDs on
Human Shit and
Human Shit (band) located at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Shit and
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Shit (band) which resulted in the deletion of
Human Shit (band) and the aforementioned targeting of
Human feces from
Human Shit. With all of that put aside, because the page is already fully protected, it's unlikely to cause further vandalism and the target itself is unambiguous from my view, even if the term is a bit crass.
Tartar
Torte
01:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep (and create
Human shit). The target is clearly correct and
WP:NOTCENSORED applies.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep – I don't understand the nomination. Are you saying the phrase "human shit" is used to described faeces but not human faeces? I very much dispute the assertion that "we usually do not say it like that". The phrase is clearly correct (apart from the capital S) and so the redirect is valid. Unless there's a discussion I don't know about,
Human shit should not have been deleted and should be recreated.
MClay1 (
talk)
12:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Note to closer: This should likely only be closed by an admin even if it is a keep or retarget as the page is fully protected, so a non-admin would not be able to remove the RfD template.
Tartar
Torte
15:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Addendum: because the page was fully protected, the RfD template was added on 14 March 2023 at 15:07 UTC.
Tartar
Torte
21:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- No longer relevant, as it was reduced it from fully-protected to semi-protected, as noted below by Thryduulf.
Tartar
Torte
12:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as a plausible search term: yes, that's not how the phrase you'd use in most everyday situations (the qualifier "human" isn't necessary most of the time), but that's exactly how you would search for the topic in an encyclopedia if you expect there to be a separate article about human feces (which there is). Redirects don't have to use the proper, or nice, words (
WP:RNEUTRAL). Could we lower the protection, though? I'm sure full protection made sense when it was instated by
Dweller in 2009, but I don't see why it would still be needed now. For comparison,
human shit has never had any protection (which means any autoconfirmed user would be able to create it), and despite this, it hasn't seen any problems since 2006. –
Uanfala (
talk)
12:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- No big comment about the decision here, other than it's odd to have this but not the lower case version. Maybe consider delete/salting this and establishing
Human shit instead, which would be found by the same search. On protection, we wouldn't perma protect these days on such flimsy grounds. I suggest it be changed to a lower level of protection, but that remain permanent, but I'm also open to persuasion. --
Dweller (
talk)
Old fashioned is the new thing!
15:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I agree that low permanent protection will still be needed. Judging by the lower-case title,
semi protection should be enough, no? –
Uanfala (
talk)
17:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I'd go with
extended-protection since people can be immature sometimes, and there had to have been a good reason why this was fully protected in the first place.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- I've boldly reduced the protection level to semi-protection, but do feel free to up it to ECP if it proves necessary.
Thryduulf (
talk)
11:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep –
WP:CHEAP and a plausible search term. Probably recreate
Human shit too. —
Mx. Granger (
talk ·
contribs)
03:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Strong keep {{
R from search term}} a very likely search term and
WP:NOTCENSORED,
WP:OFFICIALNAME. -- This just seems like censorship (sanitize Wikipedia because it is impolite), or classism (make sure the undereducated or non-native English speakers can't find the topic they want). And create the uncapitalized form as a {{
R from alternate name}} since it is missing, and the capitalized form will serve until the uncapitalized one is created. --
65.92.244.151 (
talk)
17:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21#Template:Prose timeline
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21#Pulau Laut
Humanities and Social Sciences
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 24#Humanities and Social Sciences
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21#Centiday
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
See previous RfDs for
Greek ethnographers and
Greco-Roman ethnography: ethnography has nothing to do with geography and so the redirects are misleading. The first was closed as delete, while the latter is still ongoing.
Greek ethnographer already had a notice dated at the first-linked RfD, while it wasn't actually listed among the redirects for discussion on that topic, with
Greek ethnographers being listed twice instead. This means
WP:G4 does not apply.
Randi Moth (
talk)
19:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
White Point (Victoria), Nova Scotia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Should've been bundled in together with
the rest of White Points, but I think that discussion has been listed for too long for bundling more to be acceptable. A {{
R from move}} that has been the name of the BLAR'd article for a few hours, with the malformed disambiguation meaning it's an unlikely search term.
Randi Moth (
talk)
18:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Does not appear to be an actual name for the bridge. Searching the name up in relation to the mid-bay bridge or just searching for "White Point Bridge", I can only find that the bridge is located next to the White Point road, where an administration office for the bridge exists. I cannot find any proof that the bridge is referred to by that name and it is not mentioned on the target article.
Randi Moth (
talk)
17:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Specific redirects to Multivitamin
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20#Specific redirects to Multivitamin
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
04:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target, appears to have some connection to an editor who moved it the article to this name, then moved it to a different name, creating this redirect.
Onel5969
TT me
16:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Makad Jaala - A Political Trap
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Salvio
giuliano
08:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
This is the title of a film which isn't mentioned at the target, nor on any other article
[4]. Note that the shorter title "
Makad Jaala" was
deleted as a totally implausible redirect. Someone entering this title will be sent to a page which doesn't have any information on the film, so delete.
Dsuke1998AEOS (
talk)
02:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Attempted assassination of Adolf Hitler