This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 20, 2023.
List of Demon Beasts/Monsters in Kirby: Right Back at Ya!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
07:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
There are no entries like that here. This was an R from move, and the moved page was at List of monsters in Kirby: Right Back At Ya!, which was redirected and recently deleted at RFD. This should also be deleted.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
23:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28#Have sex with
Distributed Systems Architecture
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination.
Jay
💬
07:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
The "Distributed Systems Architecture" section of
General Comprehensive Operating System was removed in
this edit, and that article now says nothing about DSA, so the redirect isn't useful. If no such section is to exist on that page, and if that page is not to be made into an article (perhaps one based on
the French Wikipedia article on DSA, the redirect page serves no purpose and should be deleted.
Guy Harris (
talk)
22:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
20:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
This —as far as I'm aware— has nothing to do with
defective pixels; maybe it is related to
raster images (as an unwanted pixel disconnected from the rest of the pixels), but the term "Stray pixel" doesn't appear anywhere on Wikipedia (besides this redirect.)
Doerakpoes (
talk)
15:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep B.A., B. A., M.A., M. A.; retarget B.A to
BA and M.A to
MA. The primary options were either retargeting all, keeping all, or some median between these two outcomes. Consensus leaned towards maintaining the 4 redirects that include intact punctuation which correctly refer to the Bachelor of Arts & Master of Arts, being "B.A.", "M.A." and their spaced alternates. As for the remaining two redirects of "B.A" and "M.A", these were not included due to not correctly referring to the Bachelor of Arts & Master of Arts, so the retargeting applies.
(non-admin closure)
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
08:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
This is confusing, given the existence of disambiguation pages
BA and
MA. Either "Bachelor of Arts" is the primary topic for the abbreviation "BA", alternatively written as "B.A.", or it isn't. I suggest
B.A. etc and
M.A. etc are retargeted to
BA and
MA respectively, as {{
R from modification}}. If there's a primary topic discussion then that would require a page move (eg of
BA to
BA (disambiguation)), which is a matter for elsewhere.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
16:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget all per nom
QuickQuokka [
talk •
contribs
20:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget all -
Taras (
talk)
20:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Caeciliusinhorto's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
21:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep B.A. and M.A. going to their current targets, as I think the perceived meaning is sufficiently altered by the presence of full stops, enough so to retain the difference in targets. I think if anyone goes to the effort of inserting such full stops in their search, we can assume they are looking for
Bachelor of Arts or
Masters of Arts; I can't seem to find anything on those dab pages which, having done so, they would otherwise be looking for (
this might be the exception). It makes sense for B. A. and M. A. to follow suit, and I think the same logic should probably extend to B.A and M.A, as, having inserted a full stop after the B or M, someone searching is probably unlikely to be looking for any of the other options on the dab page (but perhaps didn't put in the effort to insert a second one). So keep all. –
Michael Aurel (
talk)
04:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all I am with Caeciliusinhorto-public's reasoning here. I have only to add that in making and editing pages these redirects are the bread and butter of linking degrees; a more efficient and shorter way to do so.
GuardianH (
talk)
18:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget all. These are not the only terms to use a B and an A or an M and an A with full stops. Separately nominating
(M.A.), for which I cannot fathom a proper use.
BD2412
T
20:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, except the misspellings "B.A" and "M.A". --
Michael Bednarek (
talk)
02:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
15:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
20:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
The edit from 2007 that made this said "is within the municipality of Trogir" but at least since 2011 it's actually in the municipality of
Seget, Croatia, so it's been factually wrong for over a decade now :) Since it's a standalone settlement and a standard gazetteer entry like many other Croatian villages, it has
WP:POTENTIAL to get its own article, and in fact this is a substantially large one in context, so this should be turned back into a red link in order to encourage the creation of a new article instead. --
Joy (
talk)
15:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Bird app
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. procedural close
wbm1058 (
talk)
19:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Seems to point to
Astro QJ HD which points back here in a circular redirect, never ending, spiralling down into madness.
scope_creep
Talk
11:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 27#ROI flag
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28#Chip Gaines
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Deleted by
Materialscientist (
non-admin closure)
A smart kitten (
talk)
09:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Nonce redirect. No mention in article.
10100 New York (
talk)
07:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
19:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
-
On hold, please take a look of their global contribution before voting or commenting.
-Lemonaka
01:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lemonaka: I did, I don't see anything wrong. Why should we? Besides, the nature of someone's contributions shouldn't affect our !votes.
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
12:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- sockpuppetry
-Lemonaka
20:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- @
Lemonaka: Okay, I notice that the user is banned from hu.wiki for what appears to be sockpuppetry, but, again, that shouldn't affect this discussion. The nomination is perfectly sensible. (!vote delete, by the way)
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
19:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete It is a plot element of TF2, but a heavily minor one. Even after considering the nom's lack of previous contributions, I agree that it should be deleted, as I couldn't find any real source to integrate it into the article.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
09:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Zxcvbnm.
InterstellarGamer12321 (
talk |
contribs)
09:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Zxcvbnm's explanation. --
Lenticel (
talk)
07:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Evidence (law).
Jay
💬
12:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
absolutely not the best target for this redirect. ltbdl (
talk)
11:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- A quick perusal of
Category:Evidence and
Category:Evidence law suggests a bunch of more useful targets.
Evidence (law) is possibly the best;
Smoking gun,
incontrovertible evidence and
self-incrimination are all related concepts. Though our article
Pièces à Conviction translates that phrase as "incriminating evidence", French-English dictionaries instead seem to mostly translate it as "
exhibit" (e.g.
[2],
[3]).
Caeciliusinhorto-public (
talk)
14:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
21:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the late retarget suggestion. Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the suggested target pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
06:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Alonsomania
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit
02:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
While this seems to be used to some extent, it never got particularly widespread usage and
WP:RNEUTRAL states if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms
and this does not seem to be used widely in mainstream reliable sources, per my
WP:BEFORE. Having said that, I could have a poor understanding of
WP:RNEUTRAL, so apologies if this is a poor nom.
Tartar
Torte
19:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Googling the term it seems this nickname was sporadically used in the early phase of his career when Verstappen had some crashes he might have avoided; but even then (2018) the use of the name did not really catch on. He is currently one of the most stable drivers having finished all his races since 2022 Australian grand-prix (where a mechanical issue was the problem). So it seems that these nicknames are truly not relevant any more (if they ever were). Surprisingly they were added only in March this year without any justification of their creation. So I just do not understand why they exist at all.
Arnoutf (
talk)
11:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
21:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
06:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
02:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
This was left over from a move in January 2019, with the correctly spelled
Edurne (singer) being created 23 minutes later and redirected to the target. Not sure if we still need this thing. Regards,
SONIC
678
01:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- We generally do not create typo redirects unless it is very common. This redirect is very unlikely to be searched for. I support deletion.
Ca
talk to me!
15:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).