This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 2, 2023.
Small intestine (better dab)
Islams
Dolunay (dab)
Russian mystery deaths
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 16#Russian mystery deaths
Killer!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Evidence of the redirect's relevance has been found. signed,
Rosguill
talk
23:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at the target, nor does it appear to be a translation of the French title; delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Spectator Club
Library database
Facial plethora
Gruppo Finelco
Noam Chomsky/Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 9#Noam Chomsky/Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
Domovideo
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11#Domovideo
I took the wok to poland
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus on account of the incorrect capitalisation. There is consensus that the correctly capitalised
I took the wok to Poland is an appropriate redirect despite the absence of a mention at the target.
(non-admin closure) –
Uanfala (
talk)
15:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not sure how this relates to the song. Perhaps it's a lyric? But if so, it's not mentioned in the article.
Onel5969
TT me
18:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Keep – Fine {{
R from lyric}}. Per Genius' lyrics, the chorus consists of "I took the Wock' to Poland" being repeated 3 times, so it's very plausible that someone might search for the lyrics (misspelling "Wock" as "Wok" is plausible as well) without knowing the name of the song, such as if they overheard it somewhere such as on radio or in a club. Song lyrics are also not acceptable to paste into Wikipedia articles due to copyright concerns, so "not mentioned in the article" isn't something that can be fixed.
Randi Moth (
talk)
18:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
08:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- "Not mentioned" isn't a valid reason to delete a {{
R from lyric}} since they still serve as aiding the search of someone that might not know the song name without giving an unexpected target, while including the lyrics themselves into the page is commonly not an option due to copyright. Still, implausible to have multiple errors, and
I took the wok to Poland's existence means that searching won't be hampered by deletion of this.
Randi Moth
Talk
Contribs
21:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
SHABIR AHMED
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Salvio
giuliano
20:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Without justification as to why the subject of this redirect might have a special affinity toward ALL CAPS, this is ambiguous with the many other
Shabir Ahmeds of the en.wp world.
J947 †
edits
05:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
08:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Leopord from Tarzan
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
14:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
This seems like a pretty contrived vague phrase marred by a typo.
Leopard from Tarzan already exists.
Page view statistics show negligible reader interest. Originally created by what was apparently an abuser. --
Joy (
talk)
08:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
2022–23 Schleswig-Holstein-Liga
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. But retarget to
2022–23 Oberliga as a double-redirect fix.
Jay
💬
14:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Delete this redirect as anachronistic because the erstwhile Schleswig-Holstein-Liga is now the Oberliga Schleswig-Holstein since the 2017–18 season.
Santiago Claudio (
talk)
14:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
07:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Giant wombat
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate.
Jay
💬
14:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Diprotodon is not a wombat. There are genuine giant wombats like
Ramsayia and
Phascolonus, meaning that this is not an unambiguous redirect. I would say either delete this or make a disambig page. I am neutral as to which option would be best.
Hemiauchenia (
talk)
03:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- There was a mistake in the reply: though all coverage I've found of
Ramsayia and
Phascolonus has been very recent, these genera aren't that recently discovered (though
Sedophascolomys was classified in 2015). This doesn't change anything in the substance of the reply, however: the cited source says these three are the only true giant wombat genera, and there doesn't appear to be a primary topic.
Randi Moth
Talk
Contribs
23:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Kiwifarms.net
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No policy-based reason for deletion has been advanced, and it seems unlikely that any exists. If someone wants to make an
IAR argument to delete this redirect on moral grounds, they can do so in a subsequent nomination, but they should keep in mind that a redirect simply being unpleasant will usually not merit IAR deletion; rather, they would have to show that its presence harms the encyclopedia. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe)
02:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
It's a far-right redirect and I don't like it. It should not be on here because it is a redirect to a bad website that is an overall bad place. I have citations for this claim:
[1]
[2]
[3], the sources are
reliable so you cannot refute my claim at all. It is a horrible redirect and should be removed because it is far-right in nature.
Mizutani The Pokemon (
talk)
00:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Recommend a speedy Keep as per
WP:BEANS. If someone knows the URL already, then sending them to the page is appropriate, but publicising the URL via this RfD and talk page notifications etc is the opposite of the
RfC around not linking. Additionally, the cited deletion reason is
WP:IDONTLIKEIT which is not a legitimate reason. Closer: please mind my declared COI.
Lizthegrey (
talk)
01:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep on the merits of the redirect but probably speedy keep on procedural grounds. While everything Mizutani says about this disgusting website is true, we have an article about it because it is
notably disgusting, as the links provided show. Nobody is suggesting deleting the article and I'm not sure what the objection is specifically to the redirect. I'm not sure that the redirect is particularly helpful or necessary but it also does not seem incorrect for it to exist. It might serve to guide somebody to knowledge of how awful the site is. Anyway, we have redirects to many other articles about awful subjects and that is quite normal. We have 43 redirects pointing at
Nazi Party and none of them can be considered endorsements.
DanielRigal (
talk)
01:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).