This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 19, 2022.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:RDAB due to the lack of a space between the title and the disambiguator. The properly spaced variant,
Chair (professorship), exists and targets the same target as the nominated redirect.
Steel1943 (
talk)
23:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Judge Carter. which is a new disambiguation with the proper case.
Jay
💬
14:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
In addition to the current target, could refer to several people at
Carter (surname), however rather than retargeting unhelpfully to that long list and given that the correct
Judge Carter doesn't exist, I favor deletion.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
22:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I am also finding both strategies are used; generally they appear to be combined if the resulting combined page isn't very long. I have also combined some where there was complete overlap. I started a discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law#Separate or combined "Judge X" and "Justice X" disambiguation pages?. My guess is that these should be combined, given the ambiguity between judge and justice, and the fact that most justices were previously judges, unless the resulting list would be too long. In this case, I think a combined page would be good.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
02:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I would strongly oppose combining them, as this would be misleading. There is no circumstance under which anyone on the "Judge Carter" list could correctly be referred to as "Justice Carter".
BD2412
T
02:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Three Worlds cycle plot points
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Withdrawn — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Pppery (
talk •
contribs)
00:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
None of these fictional characters/plot points/locations (and my word, there are a lot) are mentioned at the target.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
18:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Trainwreck. I've only looked at the first five of these so far but I've already got four different recommendations (delete, disambig, revert, and unsure). At least some of them are the results of undiscussed mergers/BLARs by
Black Kite, at least one of which seems to merit a discusison at AfD rather than deletion of content here. I strongly encourage you to withdraw this and nominate them individually over several days to give time for proper investigation.
Thryduulf (
talk)
23:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Pull the emergency brakes per Thryduulf! I also haven't checked through all of this baggage, but I did find that several of these terms are in the titles of multiple articles (and a few with Wiktionary entries), and there's also the potential AfD stuff. I'm also afraid it might not reach a solid verdict for some of these redirects, so I'll have to agree with Thryduulf on renominating these individually and/or in smaller groups to allow more time for rummaging through the luggage car until the train can safely start. Regards,
SONIC
678
23:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I suspect what happened here is that, from the perspective of the person doing the nomination, these redirects are all closely related (all detrtirus left over from
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Worlds Cycle and a mass redirect of the books making up said cycle that I performed after the close of that AfD), so bundling seemed to make sense. I see, now, that from the perspective of RfD respondents it's a massive group of unrelated things if you look outside my framing, and am now going to withdraw and nominate in smaller chunks.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Implausible typo. We don't have
Governemnt either.
1234qwer
1234qwer
4
17:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 26#Football league
The Witness (2013 video game)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
Clyde!
Franklin!
00:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
This redirect is misleading as the game was not released in 2013. In
the previous discussion, it was briefly argued that the redirect represents that the game was once scheduled for 2013, but that would go against
WP:NCVGDAB. Back then, I did not see the responses in time, so here goes a new discussion. @
Sonic678,
Zxcvbnm,
A7V2,
Mellohi!, and
Hellknowz: pinging contributors of the last discussion.
IceWelder [
✉]
15:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as before. This is a disambiguation title not a search target that warrants a redirect. To elaborate, I don't really understand the argument that this being a scheduled date at some point means that a redirect from a disambiguation title is needed. Even if the title actually followed
WP:NCVGDAB, that's a guideline for title conflicts not for redirects. This is just a remnant of having to retitle the article due to a poor disambiguation scheme. —
HELLKNOWZ ∣
TALK
16:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep -
WP:NCVGDAB is of no relevance whatsoever. The reason to keep this is it is a plausible search term as this was originally a release date announced for the game, and further
WP:RFD#K4.
A7V2 (
talk)
23:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per my previous arguments in that discussion. 2013 was the previously planned year of release for the game, as mentioned several times in the article, and I'm not sure I could find anything regarding previously planned dates in
WP:NCVGDAB. My opinion still stands. Regards,
SONIC
678
00:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep for the same reasons as Sonic and A7V2. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
14:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Tornado 2 (Sonic the Hedgehog)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 26#The Tornado 2 (Sonic the Hedgehog)
Sonic Adventure Vocal mini-Album (Songs with Attitude)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 26#Sonic Adventure Vocal mini-Album (Songs with Attitude)
Sonic the Hedgehog: High Speed
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
14:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Seems to be a different title for the
Xbox360 version of the game but it is not mentioned in both news articles and Wikipedia articles.
Pizzaplayer219
Talk
Contribs
12:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: In my opinion this article’s history is not that important especially since it was only a few hundred bytes of information.
Pizzaplayer219
Talk
Contribs
14:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: I'm ok not retaining article history. This essentially was a non-notable announced, yet unrealized, game that is not mentioned elsewhere on Wikipedia, so it seems like there wouldn't be an appropriate place to history merge. Revert and AfD is an option, but both for expediency and
WP:NOTBURO, it seems like the result of a restore and AfD would be deletion anyways, so I maintain delete here even with some article history.
Tartar
Torte
22:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - not convinced this was ever a thing, not mentioned at target, can't find source for a potential mention, etc.
Sergecross73
msg me
14:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. I see a consensus that this redirect is inappropriate in draftspace, and no consensus on whether it should be recreated in mainspace. Thus, closing this discussion as delete without prejudice to mainspace redirect creation seems appropriate. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
An implausible cross-namespace redirect from a Malayalam translation of "Fast of Nineveh." Should be deleted per
WP:RLOTE as Malayalam has no special connection to the target's topic.
2601:647:5800:4D2:E0D3:FE68:779:9EE9 (
talk)
04:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The
Fast of Nineveh is observed in
Kerala by many
Malayali
Syriac Orthodox Christians,
Assyrian Christians,
Malankara Orthodox Syriac Christians etc.,.
- It is also an important festival in many churches of the
Malayalam-speaking Kerala.
PeterBehnam (
talk)
17:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
05:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep: and promote to mainspace. Among the other churches in Kerala that observe Moonu nombu, mentioned by Thryduulf, the
Mar Thoma Syrian Church, which alone has 1 million members and uses Malayalam as a primary language as well is argument enough for keeping.
Tartar
Torte
19:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
TartarTorte: Promote "what" to mainspace? As far as I can tell, the nominated redirect has always been a redirect. If you mean that
Moonu nombu should be created, anyone can do that
WP:BOLDly. Also, if the creator meant to request a redirect be created, that is not done in the "Draft:" namespace, but rather through
WP:AFC/R.
Steel1943 (
talk)
02:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- ...And for what it's worth, the churches were mentioned by
PeterBehnam, not
Thryduulf.
Steel1943 (
talk)
16:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Yeah, the creator of this redirect probably intended to create
Moonu nombu instead. They probably didn't understand that you should go to
WP:AFC/R to request new redirects, rather than create draft redirects yourself. I agree that there is not really anything to "promote" here.
2601:647:5800:4D2:9DA1:D3F5:F6BF:A61C (
talk)
22:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Promote was the wrong word, but my assumption, as 2601 correctly pointed out, was that this was created not realizing that
WP:AFC/R is the way to create redirects.
Tartar
Torte
22:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Pizzaplayer219
Talk
Contribs
12:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- 'Delete per Mdewman6.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
14:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Already !voted above, but regarding the lack of mention, it seems that there's enough sources to add to
Fast of Nineveh, but even if not added, there's no other reasonable target for it. It's, at least from my understanding, far more of a synonym of the Feast of Nineveh than a related, unmentioned concept.
Tartar
Torte
22:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- It seems that a lot of sites use this term as a synonym for
Fast of Nineveh. Therefore, my original claim that
Moonu nombu has no connection to the topic is incorrect. It seems that this would be a useful redirect to keep, but it is currently useless in draft space. Therefore, I would Move
Draft:Moonu nombu to
Moonu nombu without leaving a redirect.
2601:647:5800:4D2:6D83:51CA:4F67:548 (
talk)
23:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Mdewman6. —
CX Zoom[he/him] (
let's talk • {
C•
X})
14:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
06:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
This is left from a page move where the article had been for 7 months. This name is not mentioned in the article and as a very common term, landing on an Iranian movie would be confusing for someone searching for info on types of meetings. No links left, so no problem with wikilinks.
MB
03:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep I added it to the {{
lang-fa}} template in the lede; it's an (over)literal translation of the original Persian title, and was used by news media before the official English-language title was decided
[1]
[2]. Per
WP:DIFFCAPS, the primary topic of title-case and sentence-case lemmas are not likely to be same; any confusion with sentence case
private meeting can be resolved by a hatnote if necessary. The only other topic in Wikipedia correctly referred to as title-case Private Meeting is a minor TV program on
Dzaïr News.
61.239.39.90 (
talk)
06:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
05:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- We could add a hatnote on the movie page linking to
Meeting, which at least addresses the general concept
‡ El cid, el campeador
talk
20:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Pizzaplayer219
Talk
Contribs
12:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep not per
WP:SMALLDETAILS, but because nobody here seems to be able to think of any other place this would point if the film didn't exists so the title isn't actually ambiguous. It is never appropriate for an X (Y) disambiguated page to exist when the undisambiguated form X does not exist (except for subjects whose actual name has parentheses in it).
* Pppery *
it has begun...
14:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Regarding the keep arguments of IP61 and Shhhnotsoloud, since we don't have the
private meeting page, we cannot hatnote to a redlink, and WP:SMALLDETAILS is not applicable since someone entering "private meeting" (lowercase) and expecting the literal meaning, will be targeted to the Iranian film, and hence the confusion per nom. Regarding Pppery's argument, "Private Meeting" maybe unambiguous but "private meeting" is not,
conjugal visit being one of the targets I suggested. Per
WP:QUALIFIER,
If the article is not about the primary topic for the ambiguous name, the title must be disambiguated.
Also, we needn't always have parenthetical disambiguation, a title that describes is also sufficient, such as
Private Meeting film.
Jay
💬
13:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete to encourage article creation. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe)
06:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Almost all mentions of this term in mainspace refer to the button on smartphones and other such devices and not about the key on the keyboard. I would assume the button on devices is a notable topic that would encourage a
WP:REDLINK deletion. -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs)
07:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
14:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Articlefy This seems like a plausible
WP:BROADCONCEPT article that we should have.
2601:647:5800:4D2:6D83:51CA:4F67:548 (
talk)
23:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I don't have any particular preference over what to do with this, but I oppose the status quo. —
CX Zoom[he/him] (
let's talk • {
C•
X})
14:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Definitely a REDLINK deletion would be best in this case.
CycloneYoris
talk!
03:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: The home button entry at
Home (disambiguation)#Computing and technology was pointing to a non-existing section
Web browser#User interface and I fixed it to point to
Web browser#Features where the home button of the web and mobile browsers are mentioned.
Jay
💬
14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Home (disambiguation)#Computing and technology seems like it would deliver the reader to a somewhat informative disambiguation. Based on this discusion, it seems like both web browsers and smartphones have home buttons and I am unclear on which would be primary. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per above, considering "articlefy" is the equivalent of
WP:REDLINK.
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- ...And oppose targeting to
Home (disambiguation) anywhere due to "home" being a
WP:PTM and the
WP:BROADCONCEPT potential for a topic named "home button".
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 1#Anti-white racism