This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 26, 2022.
Redirects without the letter i in film
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
These redirects don't have much history beyond being leftovers from moves and fixing double redirects, and aren't getting very many pageviews nowadays, possibly because of the misspelling of "film." They also don't have any links from article space, so I'm not sure if we still need them. Also, I didn't nominate
Comedy flm because it's been getting an interestingly large number of pageviews this year. Regards,
SONIC
678
22:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Malformed MOS: redirects
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Malformed MOS: redirects
List of ancient Jedi
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 4#List of ancient Jedi
7 Regional
MSRV
Moo (Monster Rancher)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Moo (Monster Rancher)
Mocchi ball
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Mocchi ball
Yūka Morishima
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Yūka Morishima
Eastern Christian Orthodoxy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
20:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
Recently created, first pointing to
Eastern Orthodox Christianity and then to here. The other two pages can clearly be treated synonymously, and either might be searched but improbable that people would search for "Eastern Christian Orthodoxy" looking for those pages, and the term is not synonymous, as it means, literally, Eastern Christians who are orthodox, but orthodox would include Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism and perhaps even orthodox protestantism. It does not uniquely refer to "Eastern Orthodoxy".
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk)
18:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- which "eastern orthodox christians" are typically known as protestants or catholics instead? eastern catholic is obscure and protestantism is (since the reformation) one faith quite unable to be orthodox by definition even if it tries to be (since it rejects several ancient ecumenical councils). you could make this a separate page instead explaining orthodoxy from the perspective of eastern Christian church faith.
Lord saturnus (
talk)
08:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Note that the above editor is the creator of the redirect.
Beyond My Ken (
talk)
11:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Gellieman
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Jay
💬
19:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
Delete: it redirects to a section that no longer exists and was based on a viral video from the mid-2000s. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.23.192.69 (
talk)
16:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Ɡ
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Ɡ
Amenability
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Amenability
ᵮ
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#ᵮ
2020 Chinese skyscraper ban
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
List of tallest buildings in China.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
21:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
There was a supertall skyscraper ban, but the National Development and Reform Commission had nothing to do with it.
Mucube (
talk)
05:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: The user who created this redirect has been blocked as a sockpuppet. I have been going through their edits as they made a number of problematic edits, a few of which are some questionable redirects. I changed the
Chinese skyscraper ban redirect to
List of tallest buildings in China and was just about to do the same to this one as I didn't initially notice that there was a discussion because the blocked user removed it. (The list article might not be the best target, but the lede did at least mention a ban on buildings above 500 meters, so I figured that was better than what it was. Also, I have restored the deletion notice at the redirect.) With all that aside, I don't really know if the redirects are needed. As mentioned, the list does mention the ban, but it is only a brief mention in the lede. This redirect seems to be less useful than the other as I don't really see the need for the year to have been included. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
02:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Clyde!
Franklin!
06:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Wei Lang
Fredric Bedoire
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
05:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target. The article tells nothing more about this person. There is more about
this Fredric Bedoire at commons than in the article.
MB
04:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Mark Stenwyck
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Mark Stenwyck
Little Bukaria
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit
04:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
The term is not mentioned in the target article. No incoming links and not likely to be used by readers.
FAdesdae378 (
talk ·
contribs)
03:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: "Little Bukaria" was the 18th-19th Century word for Uzbekistan; see:
- Aron Arrowsmith (1831), A Compendium of Ancient and Modern Geography, The British Library, p. 679.
- Samuel Griswold Goodrich (1840), The Second Book of History: Including the Modern History of Europe, Africa, and Asia, C.J. Hendee, and Jenks and Palmer, p. 167
- John Hartley (1813), Geography for Youth, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners, J. Parry, p. 148
- Anonymous (1835),
No Opium! Or, Commerce and Christianity, Working Together for Good in China. A Letter to James Cropper, Esq. of Liverpool. By a Minister and a Layman., Thomas Ward and Co., p. 44
- Even if the article does not mention it, I believe it is a valid synonym for the country; country synonym indexes such as
this one list "Little Bukaria" as an alternate name for Uzbekistan. Surely
Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap should apply here. --
benlisquare
T•
C•
E
10:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
ToyTalk
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#ToyTalk
Swearing in of John Adams
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Inauguration of John Adams.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redirect might cause confusion: Adams' swearing-in can refer either to his presidential or vice presidential oath of office.
JJLiu112 (
talk)
02:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Inauguration of John Adams I agree that the redirect is potentially confusing, but Adams's presidential inauguration is the clear primary topic here. -
Presidentman
talk ·
contribs (
Talkback)
03:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as unneeded and per
WP:G7. Please note that John Adams (unique among all elected US vice presidents) was sworn in independently from the presidential inauguration. This is the reason I created the redirect at “swearing in of …” and not “1st VP inauguration of ...” and why IMO the current target is more appropriate than his presidential inauguration. I created this redirect to support a living vice presidents template, part of a system developed in my user space. I later modified this system so the template was not necessary and have just now modified it so that this redirect is no longer used. Consequently there are now no more references to this redirect other than those associated with this discussion. Thus i think it qualifies for speedy deletion under
WP:G7 but I’m not sure that applies after a RfD is under way.
YBG (
talk)
14:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
YBG: For what it's worth, this redirect no longer qualifies for
WP:G7 since
Presidentman voted for something other than deletion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
Steel1943: That makes good sense. Thanks for the clarification.
YBG (
talk)
22:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Inauguration of John Adams. I concur with Presidentman that his presidential inauguration is the clear main topic. Also, the current target doesn't even mention his inauguration as VP.
Clyde!
Franklin!
23:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Inauguration of John Adams with a hatnote to
John Adams#Vice presidency (1789–1797). Being sworn in as President is overwhelmingly the more significant topic, and a hatnote will resolve all doubt.
BD2412
T
23:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).