This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 4, 2022.
Redirects to Superficial charm
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Redirects to Superficial charm
Wikipedia:AAR
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Wikipedia:AAR
First letter of the alphabet
Texas United States state elections, 2006
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Texas United States state elections, 2006
V discography
Arjun Pandit (2010 film)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per
WP:G7. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
No mention of a 2010 remake or rerelease at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
16:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2022 European Athletics Championships
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#2022 European Athletics Championships
Draft:A Little More Alive
Dog (2021 film)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit
12:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Delete. When release years change, we normally delete, as misleading, the redirect that contains the erroneous release year.
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
07:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. What we do depends on how likely someone is to be looking for the film at the incorrect year, in this case given that it had three different publicised release dates in 2021 (January, July and then specifically 16 July) and that this information is included in a sourced section of the article, keeping this {{
R from move}} seems particularly useful.
Thryduulf (
talk)
15:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. The release year isn't erroneous, it's simply outdated. Sources from before the date got pushed back will refer to this as a 2021 film, so it's a useful redirect. I can't ever recall a redirect like this being deleted. Perhaps you are getting the precedent confused with "
development hell" redirects? --
Tavix (
talk)
00:44, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as useful to readers. —
Mx. Granger (
talk ·
contribs)
17:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep but Refine to
Dog_(2022_film)#Release which discusses the release year change. --
Lenticel (
talk)
01:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per above. Ambivalent about refining. —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
03:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
QASIM IBRAHIM
Bleach(anime)
Conservative think tank(s)
Helionium
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
The English Wikipedia does not describe this term anywhere. We do have an article on
helonium, but this appears to be referring to a different concept looking at the page history and talk page post. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
01:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment looking at the page history, when it was originally created, it appears it was a typo-redirect for
helonium --
65.92.246.142 (
talk)
05:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment exotic forms of helium should be discussed in the
helium article, so we are missing information there, for antihelium, antiprotonic helium, muonic helium, tauonic helium. These should be added to the characteristics section as exotic forms --
65.92.246.142 (
talk)
05:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. An
onium is a bound particle-antiparticle system such as
positronium or
protonium. Thus
helionium is a hypothetical electromagnetically bound
atomic system consisting of a
helion and an
antihelion.
Nicole Sharp (
talk)
05:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- With no mention at the target, this does not help the reader. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
16:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
04:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pionic deuterium
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Pionic deuterium
MoS4
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#MoS4
Department of Internal Affairs
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete and rename
Department of Internal Affairs (New Zealand) as
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with that
WP:PRECISE name. --
Aervanath (
talk)
14:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
If the target is the only other page with Department of Internal Affairs in its title and no other country's internal affairs department is notable enough to have their own article, then the target should probably be moved to
Department of Internal Affairs. –
MrPersonHumanGuy (
talk)
19:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment many police IA dept appear in film and television, so it would not seem that the NZ dept would be the only one notable enough to have a mention on Wikipedia --
65.92.246.142 (
talk)
05:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete then rename target. Per
MrPersonHumanGuy's suggestion, and backed up by the fact that the vast number of hits on "Department of Internal Affairs" within Wikipedia are for the New Zealand department. There's a smattering of mentions of the ones in Tashkent, Pennsylvania, and some Russian districts, and none of those have articles; a chapeau may suffice.
Chumpih. (
talk)
10:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
04:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and rename target per Chumpih. The redirect was too generic, possibly referring to any number of national interior ministries, or US police departments' internal affairs bureaus. Uganda for example has a Ministry of Internal Affairs. But as an article title it is
WP:PRECISE.
Havradim (
talk)
07:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- If there are multiple notable departments that could be known by this title then disambig, otherwise move the target over the redirect.
Thryduulf (
talk)
15:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pre-drop
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Pre-drop
Kennebunk Pier Light
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 10#Kennebunk Pier Light
Turkish prison
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Prisons in Turkey.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
I think the target of this redirect is incorrect. In my opinion, the redirect does not pertain to a single Turkish prison, a famous Turkish prison or a film about a Turkish prison. Even if the latter was correct, why was it more appropriate to have it point to the film but not
the book? Rather, it seems perfectly logical that the redirect instead pertains to
prisons in Turkey in general, and that is where this should be targeted.
Havradim (
talk)
00:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.