This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 14, 2022.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Strange redirect with no views in the last 30 days. This redirect is as if we had one called
Utah Salt Lake City (Harghita is a province of Romania, and Mădăraș is a village on the country). Useless in my opinion.
Super
Ψ
Dro
23:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep Help:Reference and point the rest to Help:Referencing for beginners. Among the multiple targets considered, only Help:Referencing for beginners had the support of all.
Jay
(talk)
03:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
I linked to
H:REF expecting it to take me to a help page on references, and, when I went to go create the redirect, was surprised to see there's no consensus on what help page to target. This is a mixed-target conflict going back over a decade, but I don't give much weight to age or pageviews, since all of the targets except Help:Reference point to content on the same topic, and in many cases people may have linked one of these without actually looking at where they point to. As such, I think we should take readers to the broadest target available. I think Help:Reference is suboptimal but it gets decent pageviews and would be a significant substantive change in target topic, so probably better left untouched; but I've included it for the sake of completeness. So: Weak keep Help:Reference, synchronize rest at
Help:Footnotes as broadest target available, but I think syncing at
Help:Referencing for beginners or
Wikipedia:Inline citations (target of
WP:REF and
WP:REFS) would be reasonable too. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
23:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
UN Global Coronavirus Fund
United States women's national under-15 soccer team
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
This redirect should be deleted to encourage actual article creation
Seany91 (
talk)
20:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Novax Djokovic
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Decimal chess
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
French brig Colibri (1802). No objections since that was suggested. --
Tavix (
talk)
02:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
The target article does not concern French ship Saint Pierre. Another ship of that name is mentioned in a footnote, but I don't think that's enough for a redirect.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
13:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Hmmm, seems I had a brainfart when creating that. It could be deleted, or turned into a shipindex page, as the French Navy had at least five vessels of that name, according to Threedecks.
Mjroots (
talk)
13:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, per Mjroots.
Acad Ronin (
talk)
16:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, but redirected to the right article, which I have done (as well as the wrongly-directed
French brig Saint Pierre). Good idea to also have a shipindex page (personally, I favour a comprehensive
List of ships named Saint Pierre, as there only seems to be this single French Navy one covered by an article at present.
Davidships (
talk)
15:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Apologies for not appreciating that.
Davidships (
talk)
22:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Do we agree on
French brig Colibri (1802) as the target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
18:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
03:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
I don't think this should be a redirect; "
Red Tory" does not refer to a specific political party, so this redirect is misleading and probably unhelpful. Proposed deletion.
AFreshStart (
talk)
22:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Red Tory#United Kingdom or Delete. I would have expected this to point to the
Labour Party (UK) as a political insult, but google hits relevant to the UK are mostly about the
Conservative Party (UK) under David Cameron's leadership and
Red Tory#United Kingdom adds the
Scottish Labour Party to the mix. That section does a good job of linking to wherever someone searching for this will be looking for, so it's probably the best target. I don't think a disambiguation page would work as it's not the proper name or a common nickname for any organisation. The (UK) suffix is plausible as "Red Tory" seems to be a more prominent political term in Canada, and it would not be unreasonable to expect
Red Tory Party to lead to something relevant to that country )I've not looked in enough detail to opine on whether that link should be blue).
Thryduulf (
talk)
00:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
18:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Miracle in Miami. --
Tavix (
talk)
02:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
The vast majority of uses of "Miami Miracle" are for the NFL football play also called the
Miracle in Miami. The baseball team which used to be called the Miami Miracle (now the Fort Myers Mighty Mussels) is little-known and hasn't played under that name since 1991, so
Miracle in Miami is probably the primary topic.
Beefaloe (formerly SpursySituation) (
talk)
07:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per nom.
10-20% of all outgoing pageviews are of
Miracle in Miami. (For comparison of frequency,
2.3-2.4% for
Birmingham →
Birmingham, Alabama, the most surprisingly-located page [from a U.S. perspective] that I can think of.) --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
01:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Okay, I created a slightly silly essay:
User:Tamzin/Merica, Birmingham, and Venus. Birmingham proved a worse example than I thought, because regional differences are a different ballgame (heh), but by the standards I made up in my essay, at 16.02% for October/November averaged this gets 1.5 Veni—in other words, it's 1.5 times as astonishing to people as it is for
Venus to be about the planet rather than the goddess (or to be a DAB). So maybe that's not as bad as I thought. I dunno. I await others' thoughts. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
02:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
18:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination.
Jay
(talk)
07:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target or any of the (
many) lists in
Category:Lists of Transformers characters. It's hard to determine if there are any other articles mentioning the character in sufficient depth to retarget as the name's a common phrase, but I don't think we'd lose much by deleting this. (I don't know anything about Transformers.) –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
17:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Redirect the "anti-Marxism" redirects to
Criticism of Marxism, the "anti-socialism" ones to
Criticism of socialism, and 'Anti-Bolshevism' ones to
Anti-bolshevism.
(non-admin closure)
Qwerfjkl
talk
23:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
SenseiAC has suggested
Anti-Marxist target
Criticism of Marxism. I am added related redirects to consider for consistency. Also note that
Anti-bolshevism is a dab (while the upper-case version listed above is a redirect).
MB
14:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- In the same way, I suggest that
Anti-socialist target
Criticism of socialism. (Note:
Anti-Leninist already targets
Anti-Leninism.) For the "anti-bolshevik" series, maybe target them all to the dab page if the dab page is relevant, otherwise it is open to discussion.
SenseiAC (
talk)
15:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
-
Anti-Marxism and
Anti-Marxist should target
Criticism of Marxism.
Anti-Socialism and
Anti-Socialist should target
Criticism of socialism.
Anti-Bolshevik,
Anti-Bolshevism, and probably
Anti-Bolshevik communism should target the DAB
Anti-bolshevism (which should probably be moved to
Anti-Bolshevism). Whatever we do, let's make sure the -ist and -ism redirects are synchronized and the differently-capitalized titles are synchronized. (I have added
Anti-socialist,
Anti-socialism,
Antisocialist, and
Antisocialism to this discussion.) —
Mx. Granger (
talk ·
contribs)
18:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect the "anti-Marxism" redirects to
Criticism of Marxism, the "anti-socialism" ones to
Criticism of socialism, and
Anti-Bolshevik and
Anti-Bolshevism to
Anti-bolshevism per Mx. Granger. However, I'm kinda torn about where to retarget
Anti-Bolshevik communism (probably to
Anti-bolshevism or
Left communism, the destination of the alternatively capitalized
Anti-Bolshevik Communism, which I'll add here because it might also be worth discussing). Regards,
SONIC
678
01:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. So it can be renominated in batches.
Jay
(talk)
07:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Each of these is apparently either an imprint or trade name used by OmniScriptum or an author who's published with them. None of them are mentioned in the target, though, so the reader is left none the wiser as to the connection between the term and the target (lists of imprints were in
the article at the time the redirects were created). Several are additionally ambiguous, e.g.
The (imprint) or
Part Press, and several like these that are based on common words don't turn up any Google results indicating any connection at all (though others do). –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
13:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
-
Comment: Only the first page was tagged; I did the rest on behalf of the nominator. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
14:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep any that are unambiguous. An imprint or trade name isn't the kind of thing that always needs to be mentioned in an article. Given how many redirects are nominated and the fact-intensive-ness of whether a term is unambiguous, I would suggest to
the nominator that a
TRAINWRECK seems likely here, and that it might be better to nominate in a series of closely-related batches. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
04:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all without prejudice per Tamzin. Group these into smaller nominations of similar redirects that each have the same desired outcomee (i.e. don't mix those you think should be deleted with those you prefer to see retargetted and keep both sets separate from those you aren't sure about).
Thryduulf (
talk)
22:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: the German-language article lists some of these. I will port over that list and its references. --
asilvering (
talk)
22:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The English article has a table and list in its history, I went ahead and pulled that back in which goes a bit further in resolving the "not mentioned" problem, but it doesn't seem like we are all the way there... I am amenable to deleting any stragglers that still aren't mentioned because I fundamentally disagree with Tamzin's idea on redirects without mention. Also delete "Get Morebooks!" due to the quotes. --
Tavix (
talk)
03:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Unless anyone objects, looks like it's for the best if I withdraw this to avoid a trainwreck and renominate some or all of these in batches in due course, probably pending a discussion regarding whether the list and table restored in the target should be kept. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
19:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Paul (singer)
Reich Ministry of Justice
Beit Shemesh Engines Ltd.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
Tavix (
talk)
02:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
No substantial information about the company in the city article, misleading to redirect there.
BilCat (
talk)
04:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Photosensitize
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
13:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
"Men's league" or "men's union" I guess is the English-language equivalent of this term? ('Bund' is cognate of 'bond' in English, I believe) "
Fraternity" would probably be the closest equivalent in English (and seemed to be what this article redirected to in the first place), but I think it's probably best we delete this as a redirect on Wikipedia to possibly make way for a good, encyclopaedic article on the German concept. Thoughts?
AFreshStart (
talk)
18:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "delete", I'm relisting after the existence of
Mannerbund was brought to my attention.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.