This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 3, 2022.
En/googlemail
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
Appears to be some age-old practice which allowed duplicate articles to be created with "En/" prefix. Only 3 such redirects exist today. No incoming links & non-significant pageviews (
479 views combined for the 3 redirects over past 6.5 years), probably accidental visitors like me. ---
CX Zoom(he/him) (
let's talk|
contribs)
20:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
(Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
I can find no obvious reaoson for this redirect to exist. Nothing links here, it got only 1 view so far this year and only 22 last year (which is higher than I would expect, but not that high), there is no talk page and no summary on creation that sheds any light. Google refuses to distinguish uses with and without parentheses so is actively unhelpful.
Thryduulf (
talk)
17:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Russian-Soviet War
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
I'm not seeing any evidence that this is an alternative name for the civil war based on GScholar and internet searches. Delete unless evidence of use can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete My first thought was the breakup of the Soviet Union, and Yeltsin behind bullet proof vests and lexan in front of the White House.
Red October is only a part of the Russian Civil War, there were the other groups as well, the parliamentarists, the republicans, the imperials, the minsheviks; not just the Bolseviks and imperials --
65.92.246.142 (
talk)
23:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
"rose tinted spectacles"
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
23:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
Could be retargeted to
rose-colored glasses, but quotation marks make this implausible/
WP:UNNATURAL.
1234qwer
1234qwer
4
13:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
1234qwer1234qwer4: I'd have no problem with retargeting (the
rose-colored glasses dab page apparently didn't exist when I created this).
- But (given that it's a 12-year-old edit I don't remember anything about) I'm not sure what the deal was with the quotes. I can't think of any reason I'd have intentionally included them in the title.
- I'm guessing it was an oversight due to cutting-and-pasting the term from a source that included the quotes, which- if the page doesn't already exist- apparently
gives you a redlink like this which lets you create the page but includes the quotes.
- I notice I created
rose tinted spectacles shortly after, so I perhaps realised my mistake. At any rate, we don't really need the quoted version of this redirect, so probably better to just delete it.
- 16:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ubcule (
talk •
contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:R from grapheme
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#Template:R from grapheme
L̥̄
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#L̥̄
Ḹ
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#Ḹ
Kong references in King Kong (2005 film)
High Princess (Stache)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
22:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
Confusing/unclear redirect. It seems that a song with some sort of variation of this title (but not exactly this title) was intended to be on
Artpop, but it looks like it didn't make the cut. Also, this redirect was at one point targeting
Zedd (producer) which targets
Zedd. It also seems the phrase "high princess" is nowhere on Wikipedia. Probably best to delete this vague/unclear redirect.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as unclear, not useful and with an unnecessary disambiguator. The target suggested by eviolite has Princess High Stache in brackets as the title of an article, but that's about it.
Jay
(talk)
06:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Areo Magazine
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
22:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
This is an inappropriate redirect for the magazine (
https://areomagazine.com/). It was established by Malhar Mali in 2016 and edited by him until 2018. The ~3 year editorship of Pluckrose does not warrant a redirect to Pluckrose, nor would it to its current editor (Iona Italia).
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
14:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep given that the target mentions more about the magazine than Helen Pluckrose's role, and we have no other articles that mention this magazine, apart from the articles that are using magazine in the citations, which makes a search more confusing for the reader. There is
Areopagitica but the mention there is trivial. Another option is to retarget to the
Aero International magazine as an {{
R from misspelling}}. In fact I first read this nomination as
Aero Magazine!
Jay
(talk)
20:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MBisanz
talk
01:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Appleton, WI MSA
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Delete Appleton, WI MSA and Appleton, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area. No consensus for Appleton, Wisconsin metropolitan area.
Jay
(talk)
05:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
This redirect is wrong, as the Appleton MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) is not at all identical to Appleton city; the MSA is much bigger. Delete per reasons for deletion #2
Yellowcard (
talk)
22:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Fox Cities, which appears to be the main article. (See, e.g. ‹The
template
Category link is being
considered for merging.›
Category:Appleton–Fox Cities metropolitan area). -
Presidentman
talk ·
contribs (
Talkback)
21:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Appleton, WI MSA and Appleton, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area per Eviolite. -
Presidentman
talk ·
contribs (
Talkback)
14:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
Fox Cities per
Presidentman as the most potential/analogous target when searching this term.
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Struck my comment since I'm unclear how to assess this after the two new redirects were bundled into the nomination.
Steel1943 (
talk)
12:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Note: just added
Appleton, Wisconsin metropolitan area and
Appleton, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area to this nomination. -
Eureka Lott
02:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete to encourage article creation. The Appleton MSA is a two-county area, and the Fox Cities article covers the
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah, WI CSA, a larger, three-county area. See
Wisconsin statistical areas for more information. -
Eureka Lott
02:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Appleton, WI MSA and Appleton, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area; retarget Appleton, WI metropolitan area to
Fox Cities. A
metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is a specific census-defined entity that has no mention in either article. A
metropolitan area, however, is a much broader term that can reasonably include more informal collections like the Fox Cities. (By the way, there are a lot more multi-county MSAs/μSAs redirecting to their primary city with little if any mention, and they should be nominated too if this gets deleted.)
eviolite
(talk)
03:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I oppose the retargeting of the latter, as this might create even more confusion. The metropolitan area can be considered the Fox cities or the MSA as defined by the Census Bureau - I think that a disamb page would make more sense therefore.
- I agree however that there are way more redirects that should be deleted as they have the same problem. Regards,
Yellowcard (
talk)
11:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need consensus for
Appleton, Wisconsin metropolitan area.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk)
16:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
G.D. Goenka School and G.d goenka. public school
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was No consensus for G.D., delete G.d. signed,
Rosguill
talk
22:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
redirect is reasonably old and abandoned. Not required and useful in anyways.
BeLucky (
talk ·
contribs)
14:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I merged these together, so hopefully it'll prevent redundant !votes. Regards,
SONIC
678
16:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep
G.D. Goenka School for now. Being old is no reason for deleting a redirect. Delete
G.d goenka. public school as a rather implausible misdotting. I notice that
BeLucky has recently created
G D Goenka Public School to cover the group/franchise, which is a poor article title that fails
WP:SMALLDETAILS since it's actually exactly the same name and the group is not consistently distinguished by a space. I suggest that BeLucky either (a) rename
G D Goenka Public School to
GD Goenka Public School (franchise) or a title with some other disambiguator, and leave the redirect pointing to the Vasant Kunj school as the
WP:primary topic, or (b) start a
move request to rename
GD Goenka Public School to
GD Goenka Public School Vasant Kunj and
G D Goenka Public School to
GD Goenka Public School, then check that the redirect still points to GD Goenka Public School, the new primary topic. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
07:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Totally agree with you about moving
Vasant Kunj located school to
GD Goenka Public School Vasant Kunj .... Was already thinking of doing the same. Will fix the primary page and redirects too. Meanwhile kindly Delete
G.d goenka. public school as it's totally unnecessary. @
Paul 012 -- (
talk)
talk
07:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding comment added by
BeLucky (
talk •
contribs)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
06:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ecole Supérieure de Réalisation Audiovisuelle
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit
13:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unclear how this is plausible when the "é" is replaced with an "Ã" and a copyright symbol.
Steel1943 (
talk)
01:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.