This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 18, 2022.
Double redirect
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep per Mx. Granger and Uanfala from the previous RfD, and tag as {{R without mention}}. It seems to be the only article we have that discusses this concept. If a reader searches for "double redirect" they're taken to a section whose title is "Redirect chains" and whose first sentence is "One redirect may lead to another". Jay(talk)05:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per the previous RfD (a two-and-a-half-month-long discussion that closed a few days ago). While it's of course preferable for a well-developed article to discuss all the relevant terminology, there's no need for each exact term to appear verbatim in the text. Here, the connection between the redirect title and the topic of the target is obvious. –
Uanfala (talk)13:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm not sure offhand if the situation changed or if my previous judgment was too hasty, but the main case where I can live with {{R without mention}} is for close synonyms. Absent explanation, a redirect generally communicates to a reader "these are the same", or at least mostly the same. It's only a short hop from "double redirect" to "one redirect may lead to another". If there's an elegant way to also mention the exact phrase, that could still be a good thing. --
BDD (
talk)
16:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Shillelagh (Shillelagh)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete.
WP:RLOTE allows for redirects in another language if there's affinity between the topic and the language, and Spanish is clearly relevant to anything Chile-related. However, this principle should only apply to proper nouns (names of people, places, objects, etc), and not to descriptive titles. –
Uanfala (talk)00:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
King of SoundCloud
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
(EP) Minus 1
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator comment: Though this title does seem to be a {{R from move}}, this redirect's title is so erroneous that there is virtually no chance of this exact title being linked, or even used as a search term. For one, there's no evidence in the article that the "Dark Space -I" subject is an
extended play at all, leaving the "(EP)" part of this redirect most likely erroneous. Also, there's no evidence that the title of the topic has ever been correctly or erroneously referred to as "Minus 1" without "Dark Space" is not inherently evident at all. And lastly, there's no evidence that the intended target had the exact name "(EP) Minus 1" ... because without that evidence, this redirect is nothing better than an erroneous,
WP:COSTLY redirect with a malformed disambiguator due to its location in the title.
Steel1943 (
talk)
16:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This is a redirect that was created as a placeholder for an article here per the history. This should be deleted per
REDYES to allow for the article to be created.
TartarTorte14:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
ITV5
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. I think there was a rumour at one time ITV Encore would launch as ITV5, or would be rebranded, but it didn't happen in any case and no longer exists.
This is Paul (
talk)
15:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
User:Tag Scientist/sandbox
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was page blanked.
Techie3 has blanked the page, to which I have no objection, and nobody has raised any concerns about removal of the redirect or objected to blanking.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
09:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)reply
No obvious reason why this redirect exists. Apparently only edit by this user was to redirect their sandbox to this page. No evidence of any content by merged between the two. Seems like this could be speedily deleted, but I can't identify a criterion for which it qualifies.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
01:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Darth Sideous
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Day Book
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
(See also:
Day Book (disambiguation).) I
believe that all three redirects should go to the same location. I'm not an expert in bookkeeping, but it would appear
from that article that a general journal is only one type of daybook among several, so that isn't the most appropriate
target, and that the spaced version (day book) is frequently used in bookkeeping, so my initial suggestion is to
Retarget all three to the
Bookkeeping article section. This should then get a hatnote linking to the dab page.
The dab page currently has a
WP:DICDEF for the most general use of the term (but no links to either of the bookkeeping definitions), and
the names of two newspapers, neither of which is simply called "Day Book". As a minimum, the dab page should have links
to the bookkeeping articles.
Tevildo (
talk)
17:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Rock reptile (Dungeons & Dragons)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It doesn't appear on the 2E list because it's 1E (Monster Manual II (TSR 1983), p. 106). I don't know what our policy is on D&D monsters that only appear in the 1E documents, so my opinion is Neutral.
Tevildo (
talk)
18:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Spider eater (Dungeons & Dragons)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This existed as an article between 2006 and 2020, when it got boldly redirected. The target article used to have a section on spider eaters that recently got removed
[1] by
Daranios. –
Uanfala (talk)16:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: For further consideration of Mdewman6's proposal. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk!00:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.