The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 22:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Typr Ib supernova → Supernova#Type Ib and Ic  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This could be retargeted to Type Ib and Ic supernovae to match the Type Ib supernova redirect; however, I'm doubtful how likely this misspelling is, and we don't have a redirect for the much more general typr either. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 20:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete, seems implausible enough of a typo. If not deleted, it definitely needs to be retargeted to Type Ib and Ic supernovae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketiltrout ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete - implausible redirect. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete as implausible typo. Only the redirect creator knows why in 2006 they created this 4 minutes after creating the proper Type Ib supernova redirect. Jay (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 10:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Supernova 2 → Supernova  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• SuperNova 2 → Supernova  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Was created as a redirect to Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova 2, later disambiguated between that and Type II supernova, before being retargeted to Supernova. Since I'm not sure how likely the use of "Supernova 2" referring to the supernova type is, I suggest either restoring the dab page or harmonising this one with the Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova 2 redirect. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Restore DAB, A type II supernova is never referred to as "Supernova 2" or even as "Supernova II". Supernova is entirely the wrong target. If we don't like the dab page, retargetting to DDR SuperNova 2 with a hatnote pointing to Type II supernova is the way to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketiltrout ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova 2. 'Supernova 2' is never used for a type II supernova as far as I am aware. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 13:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Restore DAB there are other uses besides what used to be on the disambig page. There's teh "Supernova II" music synthesizer featured in the brand article Novation Supernova. There's "Supernova II" the Special Purpose Acquisition Company that is the stock exchange listed entity for Rigetti Computing. There's the song "Supernova 2" from the album Supernova (Gonzalo Rubalcaba Trio album) -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Benzec → Belzec extermination camp  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The article does not mention "Benzec" which is presumably a misspelling. Benzec is ambiguous in real life with a medicament, and Belzec no longer redirects here, but to Bełżec Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete as an implausible misspelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketiltrout ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete: not a plausible misspelling. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete, not a plausible misspelling. JIP | Talk 21:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. This is a redirect created from a mix-up. Jay (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Kiss of Life (Kylie Minogue and Years and Years song) → Disco (Kylie Minogue album)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This disambiguation in mixing the duet artists from A Second to Midnight and Kiss of Life (Kylie Minogue and Jessie Ware song). (CC) Tbhotch ^™ 18:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Disagree: Tbhotch, I don't quite understand your concern, especially related to the duet artists. The article is about a released single that received promotion (including a music video), media coverage, and a release. Why would a redirect to the main album be necessary?} Shoestringnomad ( talk) 19:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• @ Shoestringnomad: You're clearly not understanding the point. There is no song by "Kylie Minogue and Years and Years song" titled "Kiss of Life". Kylie Minogue and Years and Years have a song titled A Second to Midnight. Kiss of Life (Kylie Minogue and Years and Years song) is an inexistent song. (CC) Tbhotch ^™ 19:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget or Delete: Readers should be redirected to Kiss of Life (Kylie Minogue and Jessie Ware song) since that it what this would most frequently be confused with. Another serious consideration: Why not delete the article altogether? It would not be controversial to do so. Shoestringnomad ( talk) 19:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete: Go ahead and delete once this discussion is over. I was rushing when I was making redirects from songs from Disco: Guest List Edition because I had school and I made a mix-up. I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PopLizard86427 ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete this error. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. While the desire to have as little discussion as possible led to some initial back-and-forth, the emerging consensus is that the page history here can be deleted as technical cleanup. Deryck C. 13:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Draft:Soviet Boris Yeltsin → Boris Yeltsin  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

I see no reason for keeping this as a redirect. Somerby ( talk) 18:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Reopening upon request. My closure: The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Obviously no benefit gained by keeping or deleting, discussion is simply a timesink. —  J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. I can't tell if this was a weird attempt at vandalism or a joke, but it clearly does not fit the purposes of draft space and thus should be deleted. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The IP creator created a duplicate of the target probably for testing. Jay (talk) 05:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unlikely typo with a comma at the end, which was identified and fixed within 10 minutes of creation. Jay (talk) 07:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Bear Creek (Yellow River, Iowa), → Bear Creek (Yellow River tributary)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unlikely typo; moved to the correct Bear Creek (Yellow River, Iowa) less than ten minutes after creation. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete, per nom, why retain this WP:UNNATURAL typo, when the correct one exists? Regards, SONIC 678, 17:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Albuquerque, New Mexico#Climate. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Albuquerque, New Mexico weather → Template:Albuquerque, New Mexico weatherbox  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Cross-namespace redirect with no purpose. Anarchyte ( talk) 15:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Albuquerque, New Mexico#Climate, which is where the template is transcluded. - Eureka Lott 15:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per Eureka and no need to have a WP:CRN WP:CNR if we can avoid it. snood1205^{( Say Hi! (talk))} 15:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per above (although I think Snood1205 means WP:CNR (Cross-namespace redirect) rather than WP:CRN (Closure Reuqests Notceboard). Thryduulf ( talk) 15:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

  Oops yep, thank you! snood1205^{( Say Hi! (talk))} 16:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Albuquerque, New Mexico#Climate per above. Climate is encyclopedic coverage of weather. —  J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Albuquerque, New Mexico#Climate per above. Cross namespace redirects are useless if we have a suitable alternative in the same namespace. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 13:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

  They aren't useless, although they are usually inferior. In this case both current and proposed targets are useful, but the proposed target is more useful. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 13:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Africa (Bacall and Malo song) → Africa (Toto song)#Covers  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

• Africa (Bacall & Malo song) → Africa (Toto song)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Bacall & Malo are not mentioned at the target, and I can't see another target where they are. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Namespace. ✗ plicit 13:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Wikipedia:NS1 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS3 → Wikipedia:User pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS5 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS7 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS9 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS11 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS13 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS15 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS101 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS119 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS711 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Wikipedia:NS829 → Help:Talk pages  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

I genuinely don't see a reason why we need a redirect for the various talk pages of each namespace. I mean, I sort of get why something like WP:NS118 points to WP:Drafts since that's the namespace number, but these talk-page redirects simply point to Help:Talk pages, which is neither useful nor helpful. I can't really think of any better place to retarget them, as the talk pages of any given namespace aren't really discussed anywhere. Primefac ( talk) 08:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Wikipedia:Namespace. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 11:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Wikipedia:Namespace. — curiousGolden ^{call me maybe?} 14:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• ( edit conflict) Retarget to Wikipedia:Namespace, where someone searching these will learn what the term means, what namespace the number refers to and a link to more information and/or the relevant namespace. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as author request. ✗ plicit 14:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Ralphthemoviemaker → After Last Season#Release and reception  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not noteworthy redirect. Only mention of subject at target page is an unsourced claim in the reception section. ★Trekker ( talk) 07:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Comment: see this related RfD discussion. As mentioned there, I made a few dubious redirects which I will nominate for RfD depending on the result of the discussion. ―  Qwerfjkl talk 07:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Enwiki has no substantive content about the subject. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• NE7 station → Lenox station (MARTA)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ambiguous with Little India MRT station; plus, station codes in general are not commonly used. feminist (+) 09:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: This title is, again, too broad. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 18:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Longbenton Metro station and Four Lane Ends Metro station are stations in NE7. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate create a new dab page at NE7, and point this title there. That will handle the stations and the postcode -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete Implausible and ambigiuous search term. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 03:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • How is it implausible, since there is a station and it is called NE7 via its station code? -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Comment I'm also happy with the disambiguation suggested by the ip editor, for this and the other NE redirects. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• NE8 station → Brookhaven/Oglethorpe station  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ambiguous with Farrer Park MRT station; plus, station codes in general are not commonly used. feminist (+) 09:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: This redirect has an overly broad title. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 18:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Could also refer to Gateshead Metro station or Gateshead Stadium Metro station, which are in the NE8 postcode district. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate create a new dab page at NE8, and point this title there. That will handle the stations and the postcode -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete Again, implausible and ambiguous search term. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 03:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • How is it implausible, since there is a station and it is called NE8 via its station code? -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( talk) 14:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• NE9 station → Chamblee station  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ambiguous with Boon Keng MRT station; plus, station codes in general are not commonly used. feminist (+) 09:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: This is another broad title. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 18:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete it would also be ambiguous with a station in the NE9 postcode district (although there aren't any at present). Thryduulf ( talk) 21:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate create a new dab page at NE9, and point this title there. That will handle both stations and the postcode -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• For the last time, DELETE It is an ambiguous and implausible search term. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 03:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • How is it implausible, since there is a station and it is called NE9 via its station code? -- 64.229.90.53 ( talk) 21:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• New York Loop → Open Loop New York  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Loop in general is not clearly defined, but the current target seems too obscure and short-lived a topic for this to be a useful redirect. feminist (+) 09:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: This redirect's title is too vague. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 18:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete - As the OP pointed out, "loop" isn't clearly defined and the redirect itself is quite vague. — curiousGolden ^{call me maybe?} 14:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Melon. Tagged as {{ R from unnecessary disambiguation}} and {{ R avoided double redirect}}. Jay (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Melon fruit → Asimina triloba  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The article does not mention "melon fruit", and this is ambiguous with the fruit Melon. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete after spending lots of time on wikiblame, it seems this term was never in the article itself (or at least not able to be found on wikiblame), and even so, if it was removed 15+ years ago then it's not a relevant redirect. Also confusion is very possible as stated by nom. snood1205^{( Say Hi! (talk))} 20:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget - to melon -- awkwafaba ( 📥) 12:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Melon and tag as {{ R from unnecessary disambiguation}} and {{ R avoided double redirect|Melon (fruit)}}. Thryduulf ( talk) 17:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget: The melon is a fruit. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 11:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to melon per above. —  J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 13:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

• Difference equation → Recurrence relation  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Difference equations → Recurrence relation  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Because there is continuous time difference equation, we should create seperate article. Sharouser ( talk) 03:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Furthermore, there are Difference Equations in a Multidimensional Space. Finite difference methods utilize various difference equations in a multidimensional space. Sharouser ( talk) 07:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.