This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 26, 2021.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to create if it gains a mention somewhere. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not even mentioned at the target article. Going through the edit history it appears to be a non-notable meme.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
01:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Not even mentioned? I see what you did there ;) Also, would it be possible to add some information about Not Even Doom Music to the article? It was fairly popular back in the day, at least from what I can remember.
DesertPipeline (
talk)
07:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
04:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at target.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
22:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was restore. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
This is a bit odd: I can't work out if it means HERMES-A and MINOTAUR, or HERMES-A also known as MINOTAUR. Anyway, the target article has no information about either or any indication of why the redirect targets there. At one of the linked articles
NEE-01 Pegaso, HERMES-A is mentioned but MINOTAUR is not: this might be a better target if this redirect is kept, but it might be better to delete since Enwiki seems to have no information about the project.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
19:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
New Jersey–New York relations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
These search terms are not equivalent to the target article, nor does there appear to be any other appropriate target. Delete unless a justification or alternative can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 6#Kalininia
Wolfgang Becker (director)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
Delete: This was a speedy delete request denied, and turned into a redirect to a DAB page. I stand by my original reasoning for delete: This relink page should never have been created in the first place, since there are two German film directors of the same name, who I've moved to
Wolfgang Becker (director, born 1910) and
Wolfgang Becker (director, born 1954) now,
after this discussion. This frees up
Wolfgang Becker to be the disambiguation page. There is no plausible use for this former relink page, since it cannot target both directors at the same time, nor become a disambiguation page. But its continued existence can lead to plenty of confusion and false linking. The tag given to it now (from incomplete disambiguation) may be technically true, but doesn't help to address the potential harm, and lack of usefulness it has going forward.
Sprachraum (
talk)
20:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
PAGE FAULT IN NONPAGED AREA
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Trainwreck averted. Bystanders warned people about the danger of an oncoming train, successfully pulling most passersby to safety instead of wasting time on a discussion that could not go anywhere. signed,
Rosguill
talk
04:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
Stop error codes not mentioned in target, and even if they were these search terms are very implausible. So delete.
Aasim (
talk)
16:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- I haven't looked in detail yet, but these are extremely plausible search terms as they are exactly the sort of thing people will be looking on Wikipedia to find information about. If we have anywhere with relevant content at least most of these should not be redlinks.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- I'm tempted to call this a Trainwreck - way too many redirects nominated at once and a lot of these do have valid alternate targets. Some of the ones I've found so far:
- etc. Someone with more knowledge of these error codes might be able to find valid targets for the others too
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
19:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 5#One-ring fraud
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Eisenhorn. signed,
Rosguill
talk
16:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
This is a character from the Warhammer 40,000 universe who only has only a passing mention in the main Warhammer 40,000 article in the section about a proposed TV adaptation. He is however the protagonist of a trilogy of books (
Eisenhorn) a video game based on the books (
Eisenhorn: Xenos) and the aforementioned planned TV show based on the books. I propose retargeting these to the article on the book trilogy as the main work the character has appeared in.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
12:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural close - wrong forum.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Water Pasteurisation Indicator
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Water Pasteurisation Indicator
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
02:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
While the page does discuss promiscuity and gay men, this title seems unnecessarily derogatory and stereotypical;
heterosexual promiscuity doesn't exist as a redirect, so why this?
Bangalamania (
talk)
19:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Could be a plausible search term. How many pageviews does it get? I can't check via the "stats" link, because Toolforge requires Javascript (probably) to be enabled :(
DesertPipeline (
talk)
07:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- 16 Page views in the last year, 48 in total since creation.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
08:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep: It doesn't get many page views as 86.23.109.101 mentions, which is why this is only a "weak" keep, but I can't argue that the redirect serves no purpose, so I wouldn't really agree with deletion.
DesertPipeline (
talk)
10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
LGBT stereotypes#Sex and relationships. Possibly a non-NPOV redirect, but this target is the most relevant section for the stereotype as a concept.
BlackholeWA (
talk)
08:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
02:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
While 'homosexual' generally means 'homosexual male' in English, in theory 'homosexual prostitute' could still refer to lesbian prostitutes/sex workers, or women prostitutes who have sex with other women.
Bangalamania (
talk)
19:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- I assure you that they do. :) But female sex workers with female clients are not common, and as far as I can tell we don't have an article with information about them. Is "homosexual prostitute" a topic that someone might plausibly look for? I think so. Do we have an article with the information they want? I think that's very likely to be
male prostitution. -
Jason A. Quest (
talk)
23:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#In the hood