This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 11, 2021.
Justice for Black Farmers Act
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
The Justice for Black Farmers Act isn't a part of the
American Rescue Plan, so I don't think this redirect should exist as such. —
Mikehawk10 (
talk)
22:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 18#Save command
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Lindi Cistia Prabha
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
The sale of the printer's manuscript of the Book of Mormon a few years back was a fairly big news event, but it seems that the idea of a printer's manuscript is a much wider topic than this one specific printer's manuscript.
Hog Farm
Talk
05:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Put me down as a surprising keep as well. If we had a place that specifically discusses a "printer's manuscript" in general (perhaps at
Manuscript?), I'd be open to a retarget, but I'm not seeing it. From usage, it does seem that the Book of Mormon is easily the primary topic amongst individual examples of a printer's manuscript. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 21#Anal people
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was soft delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
21:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at the target. While I can find some less-than-reliable sources suggesting that this was an ancient name for the island that Krakatoa is found on (
[1]
[2]), I can't find any RS that attest this name. Delete unless RS usage can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
16:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
These songs were previously included on the EP when it was first announced in late 2019, but now that the EP has been released, are not on the final track list or any other Todrick Hall release, therefore they are no longer valid redirects.
Ss
112
16:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Temporary move (Salihorsk)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G6.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
A leftover from the titular temporary move in August 2020, this doesn't seem to be necessary anymore. Delete unless a justification can be provided. Regards,
SONIC
678
15:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Wikipedia:DW
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Cubo-Futurism#Importance of Post-Revolutionary context. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on wikipedia with respect to 40K. Some internet searches suggest that the overwhelming primary use of these phrases relate to an art exhibition from a couple of years ago, rather than 40k
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
11:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Northern Ireland national futsal team
2009–10 Cheltenham Town F.C. season
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
The terminology "created universe" may or may not be plausible depending on your views here, but the lack of a space before the disambiguator definitely makes this thing more questionable. Although it's existed for years, it doesn't seem to get very many pageviews now, for example only 14 last year, possibly at least in part for that reason. Regards,
SONIC
678
06:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Référence nécessaire
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete in its current form. However, feel free to repurpose to make it work with translation. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
In the English Wikipedia, we do not need a French redirect.
Alcremie (
talk)
04:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy Keep as obviously useful (see guideline
WP:R#KEEP, item #5); it currently has four transclusions. We have tons of foreign-language article and template redirects that help editors expand the English Wikipedia by making template names from commonly translated foreign-language Wikipedias readily available. I work to fix template redlinks across all namespaces, and creating redirects for foreign-language template names is an easy way to help editors who are doing this valuable translation work. If someone wants to set up a bot to automatically replace instances of this template with {{
citation needed}}, I would have no objection to that. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
05:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and replace current uses with
Template:Citation needed. General purpose templates in the English Wikipedia should be in English- there's no specific affinity between French and the Citation Needed template to justify a Foreign language redirect per
WP:FORRED. If an English speaking editor was editing an article on the English Wikipedia and came across {{Référence nécessaire}} or {{要出典}} or another language variant there's a fairly high chance they won't know what the template is or what it does.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
11:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The fluency required in both languages to translate an non-English Wikipedia article into English is far higher than the fluency required to translate the name of common templates (although ideally they'd actually find the citation directly, I know that isn't always going to be possible). There is no other plausible use case (at least until
phab:T6547 is resolved).
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete – We don't need foreign versions of every template in every language. I see no reason why this one in particular is justified above any others.
MClay1 (
talk)
09:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Repurpose to make it substitute-only (automatically substituted by bot), assisting with translation to English as suggested by Jonesey95. This is what we do with many citation templates, and it's immensely helpful. Thanks!
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
15:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete in its current form. However, feel free to repurpose to make it work with translation. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
In English Wikipedia, we don't need a template redirection in Swedish.
Alcremie (
talk)
14:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. While I could see an argument being made for templates with a clear connection to the Swedish language, general templates like this one are not useful.
Thryduulf (
talk)
15:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete No specific connection between the Swedish language and the citation needed template to justify a foreign language redirect per
WP:FORRED. General purpose templates should be in English on the English Wikipedia, I can't see any point in creating hundreds of alternate language redirects. Does not seem to be getting much use lately, only 1 page view in the last 90 days.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
15:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete foreign-language redirects generally shouldn't exist in non-article space.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
16:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as obviously useful for editors translating articles from WP in other languages. See {{
Kilde www}} and the dozens of template redirects like it for more examples. This template is currently transcluded in a draft article, along with multiple other similar template redirects. This redirect does no harm and is clearly useful; see guideline
WP:R#KEEP, item #5. If someone wants to set up a bot to automatically replace instances of this template with its target, I would have no objection to that. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
05:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete in its current form. However, feel free to repurpose to make it work with translation. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
This is a Chinese redirect and I don't think this template is likely to be used.
Alcremie (
talk)
13:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as an inappropriate foreign language redirect. Templates should be in English on the English Wikipedia, there's no point creating hundreds of alternative language redirects for each template. There's nothing particularly Japanese about the citation needed template that would justify a Japanese language redirect per
WP:FORRED.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
13:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per both above.
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as obviously useful for editors translating articles from WP in other languages. See {{
Kilde www}} and the dozens of template redirects like it for more examples. This redirect does no harm and is clearly useful; see guideline
WP:R#KEEP, item #5. It was created because an editor was attempting to use it on a page here at en.WP. If someone wants to set up a bot to automatically replace instances of this template with its target, I would have no objection to that. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
05:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- If {{
Kilde www}} was the redirect up for discussion I would have voted Keep, because there is a clear and unambiguous link between {{
Cite web/Danish}} and the Danish language: The template is designed to replicate the behaviour of the Danish Wikipedia template, it supports and auto translates Danish language inputs, and the reason it exists is so that you can copy and paste Kilde www templates from the Danish Wikipedia and have them automatically work. There's no such link between the Citation needed template and the Japanese/Swedish/French language. There's nothing Japanese about the concept of a statement needing a citation, the template doesn't support Japanese language inputs or outputs, and they don't even seem to work in the same way.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
14:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Created disambiguation page for the name "Tony Hart"
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by
Athaenara as
G6. (non admin-closure)
Joseph
2302 (
talk)
14:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
This is a leftover from a move to the correct title format, as this one's nonstandard format is unlikely to be searched for. As such, I'm not sure we should keep this lying around, so delete unless a justification can be provided. Regards,
SONIC
678
06:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Word art
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Presidents are not exclusive to the United States. -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs)
04:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Is there anything on WP about former presidents from any other country(s) who ran for the presidency?
Station1 (
talk)
06:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
-
List of former Philippines presidents who pursued public office is the only one I could find so far. -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs)
07:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- In that case, we could make it a dab page, although so few people ever look at it (60 all last year), that deletion is fine too.
Station1 (
talk)
08:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Disambiguate - title is ambiguous as could refer to the presidents of any country. Additionally the target page doesn't actually mention anything to do with the redirect. The pages the redirect should go to are
Elections lost by presidents of the United States (for elections lost) and
List of presidents of the United States by other offices held (for elections won).
SSSB (
talk)
08:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Specific unlikely search term and there aren't particular articles this needs to point to.
Reywas92
Talk
18:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Too ambiguous and implausible to disambiguate.
Aasim (
talk)
06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Not only is this title not specific to the United States we don't have any such list for the Untied States (or any other country I looked for).
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Not specific to United States and there is nowhere helpful for it to target. "Subsequent office" would include only those who won (such as
Grover Cleveland) but not those who lost (such as
Teddy Roosevelt), and this section was removed from the article anyway. Someone could create a list article or set index in the future.
Mdewman6 (
talk)
01:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Implausible search term. --
Un assiolo (
talk)
19:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Ambiguous title, not helpful as DAB, and an unlikely search term.
Drdpw (
talk)
00:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Our words are backed with nuclear weapons!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
Onel5969
TT me
01:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
I'm gonna go build my own theme park with blackjack and hookers!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target.
Onel5969
TT me
01:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Do you feel like a hero yet?
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target
Onel5969
TT me
01:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Shut up and take my money!
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Is not mentioned in the target article.
Onel5969
TT me
01:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at target article, and redirect is unused - only 4 page views in the last year. There was some article content here which through a series of mergers and moves has ended up in
this user sandbox, where it hasn't been edited since 2008.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
00:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target article. There was a short article at this title for about 3 weeks in 2005 but I don't think it would have any chance of surviving an AfD nomination. Unused, only got 3 page views in the last year
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
00:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.