Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 3

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 3, 2020.

Homosexuality in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LGBT in the United States. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 22:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

I think it should redirect to LGBT in the United States, which covers a broader topic and discusses LGBT rights. — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 23:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cultural references in Pokémon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC) reply

As redirects, there seems to be no appropriate place for these to target per WP:XY, given there is no appropriate information at Pokémon which these redirects could refer, and the titles of the redirects do not show exclusivity to Pokémon (anime), their current target which doesn't include such information either. The redirect Cultural references in Pokémon was previously an article which was deleted in 2006 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural references in Pokémon (4th nomination), but then had its edit history restored in 2009. However, with all that being said, I am not seeing the content which was formerly at this title present in any Pokémon-related article, meaning the edit history should be safe to delete. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020 Singapore Grand Prix

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Singapore Grand Prix#2020. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 22:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

I have no clue why this page redirects to the "2020 One World Championship" article. Seventyfiveyears at 19:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC) reply

To awnser the question directly. This redirects to its destination because the 2020 Singapore Grand Prix was supposed to be a round of the 2020 Formula One World Championship before it got cancelled due to COVID-19. This is made very clear within the article.
SSSB ( talk) 21:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PLpro

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A Scholar search suggests that PLpro stands for "papain-like protease", which is not equivalent to papain itself. It's not mentioned at the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Weak delete to encourage article creation. It does seem to be a protease that's been researched significantly because it turns up in coronaviruses, and other related ones like 3CLpro have significant articles. I don't think it's necessarily harmful to point it at Papain as it is at the moment (as the article does explain the mechanism) but it's not really all that helpful either, and while it's mentioned in several coronavirus-related articles it's not really discussed usefully anywhere else to retarget. ~ mazca talk 12:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BERSATU Blackout

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21#BERSATU Blackout

Mississippi Mudflap

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Slang terms that receive hardly any use anywhere, falls within WP:RFD#DELETE #8 as novel or obscure synonyms. Hog Farm Bacon 15:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 20:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Holler (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Film-title-to-director redirect for a film that entered the production pipeline a decade ago but appears never to have come out the other end as a completed film, and is not mentioned in the target article at all. The more serious problem is that a completely different film of the same title, by a different director, premiered this year -- meaning that a person who wants to find the 2020 film will get badly confused and misled by this (in fact, there's already an inbound link expecting the 2020 film). If I could find evidence that the Shapiro film had ever actually come out at all, then I'd just move this to a new title that added the year of release to the disambiguator -- but I can't find any such evidence, so deletion is the more appropriate response. Bearcat ( talk) 19:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Midnight Raymond Chandler

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11#The Midnight Raymond Chandler

Chandler (occupation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep the one with the useful disambiguator. signed, Rosguill talk 19:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure if the most appropriate target for these redirects is Chandlery or Candle. They should probably both go to one or the other. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to Raymond Chandler

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget all except The Midnight Raymond Chandler (which will be separated into a new nomination) to Raymond Chandler bibliography. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 17:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Various topics (probably works) that are not mentioned in the target article, leaving readers searching for these terms left with finding no such information. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The King of Burgers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

"Burger King" has neither any content nor mentioned anything about "The King of Burgers". Seventyfiveyears at 01:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 15:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Goosebumps: Slappy Halloween

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete "untitled", no consensus for the rest. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete Related to the nom. from yesterday, this is an example of the mess that results when out-of-date redirects are nonetheless kept in the draftspace, all of which target an article that was itself never in the draftspace! (though I am fine keeping the now-title-matching Draft:Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween in spite of that). UnitedStatesian ( talk) 01:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 15:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

06452017

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Apparently it's an inmate number, not a likely search term. Hog Farm Bacon 14:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2019–20 California energy crisis

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 10#2019–20 California energy crisis

Wading

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Wading and swimming are not the same thing. With only two rivers, I can't find enough entries to justify converting this to a dab page. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

All I could find are WP:PTMs, sort of: Wading River (a dab), the redirects Wading pool and Wading bird (not to be confused with Category:Wading birds). You would think this should be a subtopic of Aquatic locomotion, or at least an associated term, but there's nothing in that article specifically about "wading". – Uanfala (talk) 10:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Oh, and there's Deep wading, for vehicles. – Uanfala (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Lemma not included in target. Hildeoc ( talk) 19:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply

It is not. It's a redirect to Karger, because it's fairly standard practice to redirect lesser notable journals to their publishers. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Right, so it's the good crap instead of the bad crap. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep Might feel differently if this were part of a well reasoned bulk nomination, or was testing consensus for same, but per Headbomb, makes no sense as a one-off delete. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sketch Films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. Not mentioned in target article and potentially ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 15:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I created this redirect in 2018 as a replacement for a piped link in 2012 in film, in connection with the film Underworld: Awakening, which Len Wiseman directed - presumably in association with Sketch Films, who are mentioned in the film's article as a production company, though no explicit connection is made between the company and Mr Wiseman. Colonies Chris ( talk) 15:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Invest 99-L

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 10#Invest 99-L

Creation vs. mainstream science in cosmology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

not a plausible search term. jps ( talk) 03:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete sort of an WP:XY; unlikely to be searched, as the nominator says. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_3&oldid=979590832"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE