The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close ( WP:PCLOSE); inappropriate venue. @ Aza24: Feel free to take the suggestion made by Sonic678 or use another venue more fitting for the nature of this discussion. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 10:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• La Scapigliata → Head of a Woman (Leonardo)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This painting is known by many names: Head of a woman, Head of a young girl, Female head, Young Girl's Head etc. But every single source I have found always mentions it as La Scapigliata. (Among one of the other names I listed) I want to move this article's name to La Scapigliata because it is definitely more well known by the name, but since this redirect exists I can not change it. (Note: The French Wikipedia's featured version of the painting goes by La Scapigliata as well) I hope I'm explaining this clearly, but the point I'm making is that I want to rename the main article ( Head of a Woman (Leonardo)) as the name this redirect (La Scapigliata) and cannot do so unless this redirect is deleted. Aza24 ( talk) 23:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment: You might want to file a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests (or WP:RM#CM if you think it's that controversial) to discuss this matter. Regards, SONIC 678 00:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Procedural close: wrong forum (per Sonic). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Aphelios → League of Legends  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:VGSCOPE and the rationale at this discussion a few months ago (1^st choice). This is apparently a character in the game, but his notability is questionable (sure, he may be popular among players, but probably not enough to warrant his own Wikipedia page). Super weak retarget to Salmo aphelios (2^nd choice), a search for the term reveals that it also has a connection with this trout species, but then again I'm not entirely sure it would be a plausible search term for that either, since it's questionable whether people would search organisms with just the species name. Regards, SONIC 678 01:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Oppose retarget to Salmo aphelios. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristis (2nd nomination). If we shouldn't have DAB pages with only specific epithets, we shouldn't have redirects from them either. Narky Blert ( talk) 12:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Ultra Donkey Kong → Donkey Kong 64  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Searching online, I found two different explanations on fan wikis: Fandom says that this was the name of a 2007 Wii game (that we don't appear to have an article for), whereas Mariowiki says that this was a working title for a N64/DD64 Donkey Kong game that was never released but was mentioned in a Japanese magazine. Either way, the existing redirect is not particularly helpful. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete the Fandom entry is a complete fake (is it possible to get that deleted) and even if Nintendo Power mentioned a potential game by that name once it seems to trivial to mention.-- 69.157.254.64 ( talk) 02:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Yeah, you didn't need to cite the Fandtendo page, it's a joke website (as in the site is completely sarcastic and mostly makes entries on games that don't exist). Not to mention, if the name is mean to combine the N64's code name and Donkey Kong, who would have search for that on Wikipedia? Captain Galaxy ( talk) 20:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Ultra NES → Nintendo 64  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, and an internet search didn't suggest that this is an alternative title for the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete the console was never known as the Ultra NES.-- 69.157.254.64 ( talk) 02:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete The console has only been know as the Ultra 64 and if it were to have the code name of a previous console, it would have been the SNES. Not to mention, the name 'Ultra NES' is used for an NES emulator. Captain Galaxy ( talk) 20:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• They taking the hobbits to isengard → The Lord of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• There taking the hobbits to isengard → The Lord of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• They're taking the hobbits to isengard → The Lord of the Rings  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not helpful for a reader who searches this up. The article tells him exactly nothing about this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• This is a very silly and unneeded redirect. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete As "They're taking the hobbits to ...." or whatever humorous content this has is not at all notable or ....   3125A ^{Talk! _Edits!} 01:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, meme that doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• The Lord of the Rings film series) → The Lord of the Rings (film series)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nobody will search for it with a ). 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep per RHARMFUL; this is a simple miss of the left bracket key. —  J947 ^[cont] 20:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Malformed qualifier, useless clutter. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Malformed and unnecessary. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. First of all, everyone would fix that bracket immediately. Second of all, it is very silly.   3125A ^{Talk! _Edits!} 01:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete for reasons given above. CapnZapp ( talk) 10:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Wicipǣdia → Wikipedia  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unlikely. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Old English (ang) wikipedia is "Wikipǣdia", but it is differnt than this one because this has a C. CrazyBoy826 ( talk | contribs) 23:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • You need a colon before the link for it to work (e.g. ang:Project). —  J947 ^[cont] 23:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Even spelled properly, having a redirect for an Old English spelling seems to be pushing the limits of plausibility a little. Spelled like this, it's pretty much useless. Thegreatluigi ( talk) 00:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Old English Wikipedia, as the Anglo-Saxons never used kays. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete not a likely search term, not even for Old English Wikipedia, especially as it is hard to type (i.e. formulate the text. -- Bejnar ( talk) 16:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Aublysodon. -- BDD ( talk) 14:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Deinodon cristatus (Marsh) → Tyrannosaurus  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Seems to refer to Deinodon, recommend retarget to there. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Not necessarily. That very article states the material was reassigned to Aublysodon, and that article states they may have belonged to juvenile Tyrannosaurus. FunkMonk ( talk) 18:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The holotype of Deinodon is D. horridus. Many other species historically assigned to Deinodon have been re-assigned to other taxa, including this one. I'd probably have this redirect to Aublysodon, or remove the redirect and make it its own page. Dinoguy2 ( talk) 19:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep - I'm not an expert at paleontology, but from what I can tell, Deinodon cristatus is an obsolete taxonym for the Tyrannosaurus rex. There have been other Deinodon cristatus, but this does not seem to be ambiguous, because of the (Marsh) qualifier. Marsh was the one who assigned the Deinodon cristatus taxonym, and I can't find evidence of Marsh using this name for another creature. I'm not an expert in paleontology, so there is a decent possibility I missed something somewhere, though. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Deinodon, where it's mentioned. Deinodon is a tyrannosaurid, but a different species to Tyrannosaurus. D. cristatus (Marsh) is a synonym of Aublysodon cristatus. Narky Blert ( talk) 13:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Then it should redirect to Aublysodon, not Deinodon. FunkMonk ( talk) 21:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Aublysodon or keep at Tyrannosaurus, it is basically considered one of these possibilities, Deinodon was its original, outdated designation. FunkMonk ( talk) 09:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Aublysodon. Molnar & Carpenter (1989) consider Aublysodon cristatus a junior synonym of Aublysodon mirandus. Lythronaxargestes ( talk | contribs) 15:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Aublysodon following Lythronax above. IJReid ^{{{ T - C - D - R}}} 19:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Aublysodon, according to the article of Deinodon, D. cristatus is a synonym of Aublysodon. JurassicClassic767 ( talk) 13:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Could anyone neatly incorporate this name at Aublysodon? Its absence would make a retargeting there confusing. -- BDD ( talk) 21:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Done. Under synonyms in infobox. -- Bejnar ( talk) 02:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC) reply

That works for me. As a potential closer, I saw consensus for a retarget, but an obstacle to that outcome. You've now removed it. Thanks! -- BDD ( talk) 14:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. Some things that have a possibility of confusion still have WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 18:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Lotr → The Lord of the Rings (disambiguation)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Retarget to The Lord of the Rings analogously to LotR. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

You could have just done that, but it's not clear the the dab page isn't a better target. There's a significant chance that someone is referring to one of the other uses. You could look at the stats of the relevant pages. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply

Agree that the dab page is best target - offers all the options ( LOTR also points to dab page). Pam D 15:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep as is, tagging as {{ R from other capitalisation}} {{ R from ambiguous term}}. If there's any possibility of confusion, it's always best to point to a DAB page - links to those get found and fixed; links to article pages never do, unless some editor grits their teeth and goes gnoming. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Compare IoT as a case in point. Narky Blert ( talk) 22:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget I agree that the dab page is not the best target; Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" is by far the WP:COMMONNAME for this (I'd rather not have to have to look up pageviews to demonstrate this...) and an editor searching for this (with all of the variant capitalisations) is unlikely to be searching for something else. In that rare case, there is already a hatnote on top... RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 15:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget The novel is the primary topic even the dab page is entirely about its adaptations. This probably didn't/shouldn't need discussion. Gotitbro ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 21:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Simurilian → The Silmarillion  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Highly implausible. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep you can count on the fingers Frodo's hand the number of people who can spell "Silmarillion". All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
  • So can you the people who spell it like this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:00, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Reasonable attempt at a phonetical pronunciation, Silmarillion is difficult to both spell and pronounce. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep, it helped 17 people in the past year, and for something so cheap, why not. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep: English spelling of the schwa is notoriously inconsistent, and double letters are irregular too. That just leaves the initial L, which is hard to hear and possibly subject to elision in some accents. I consider this combination of mistakes perfectly plausible. -- N Y Kevin 19:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 20:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Gandalv → Gandalf  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Highly implausible. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep, the F and V keys are adjacent to each other on a keyboard, and someone might mistakenly type in "Gandalv" because of their finger slipping off the F key onto the V key. Then again, I'm not sure if this typo's used very often. Regards, SONIC 678 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep. The appendices in The Return of the King give the pronunciation of the final "f" as a "v", meaning there are Tolkien purists out there pronouncing it "Gandalv". Will that help people find the correct article? Ehhh, maybe? Woodroar ( talk) 15:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep, it helped 45 people in the past year, and for something so cheap, why not. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per everyone above. What is to be gained by deleting this redirect? —  J947 ^[cont] 20:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep - Unambiguous and harmless. No gain in deleting, a little bit of benefit in keeping. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. F and V are adjacent to each other on the QWERTY keyboard and Gandalv and Gandalf sound similar. OcelotCreeper ( talk) 15:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• J.R. R. Tolkien → J. R. R. Tolkien  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• J. R.R. Tolkien → J. R. R. Tolkien  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible spacing. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep these are neither new nor harmful. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
• Keep. Unambiguous and not harmful. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep per above: this redirect is unambiguous, helpful, and harmless. Ever missed the space bar? Of course you have, plenty of times. —  J947 ^[cont] 20:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep after Destruction of Isengard was recreated (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 12:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Destruction of isengard → Isengard#Destruction  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Destruction of Isengard was deleted. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep and recreate Destruction of Isengard. The deleted variant had pointed to a different article which was deleted at AfD. The destruction of Isengard is discussed at the current target, so both should exist and point to there. Hog Farm ( talk) 15:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep, I'd have said exactly the same as Hog Farm: it's a sensible topic with an obvious and helpful target. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Plausible search term and good target. Tag as {{ R from other capitalisation}} to make it {{ unprintworthy}}; Destruction of Isengard is all that is needed in the hypothetical printed index; avoid duplicative clutter. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 20:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• '0' → 48 (number)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• '2' → 50 (number)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• '3' → 51 (number)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• '9' → 57 (number)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Delete as the User:Xayahrainie43 has been blocked due to refusal to inability to communicate, and has been globally blocked due to long-term abuse. Also delete the others, such as '2'. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 09:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Speedy per WP:G5. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • But the user was not blocked at the time of creation so G5 does not apply. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete as misleading. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Not sure what they mean, and this isn't a Unicode- or ASCII-like correspondence that I'm aware of, so they're misleading at best. ComplexRational ( talk) 15:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• This IS unicode/ascii correspondence. 0 = 0X30 = 48, etc. Not sure it's useful: in fact I'm sure it's not. It would be better to Retarget to a suitable page dealing with digits qua digits. Perhaps Digit? All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

  Perhaps relating to C (programming language) where single quoted characters take on the meaning of their numeric representation, traditionally ASCII (or EBCDIC). All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

  I should have clarified, I am aware of the pattern of 0 = 0x30 = 48, etc., but these redirects don't seem like a logical way of representing them. And as far as programming languages, the char type and similar representations exist in other programming languages such as Java, so I'm not sure about that for a retarget. ComplexRational ( talk) 16:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  Oh I'm certainly not suggesting redirecting it to C! All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 22:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

• Delete. Not sure how '0' is supposed to redirect to 2, and all of the rest of that. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD ^balaji ( M•T•A• C) This message was left at 03:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget Numerical digit this makes sense as the quotation means a digit qua digit. It doesn't cover the original intent of the redirect, but that can be rectified by expanding the article, and the new target is more general, effectively covering most likely meanings. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 13:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
• Retarget to respective pages ( 0, 2, 3, 9); The hexadecimal meaning is correct but it's extremely unlikely someone looking for '0' is actually looking for 48... RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 03:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per RandomCanadian. —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 07:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:XY. Also quite weird search terms in for both uses. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 18:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sock-puppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• User:GEO IS THE BEST → User:ჯეო  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

What the heck it was be that there!?! User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 09:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep per WP:DOPPELGANGER. Nom gave no formal reason to delete this redirect. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 20:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Canis aquaticus → Poodle  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Poodles aren't a species. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Well, a species of their own. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Appears to be a different breed. See [1]. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Barbet (dog). In HF's link, Linnaeus equated both subspecies of Canis aquaticus to Buffon's "barbet". C. aquaticus is a thoroughly obsolete species name, but can be found at wikispecies:Canis aquaticus. Narky Blert ( talk) 08:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete or retarget to water dog per William Harris below. Cavalryman ( talk) 08:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC) !vote amended. Cavalryman ( talk) 01:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC).. reply

• Retarget to Barbet (dog). per Narky Blert All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 22:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

• Delete. This is not not an obsolete species name, it is listed as a taxonomic synonym for Canis familiaris, as found in the domestic dog article's taxobox. This implies that it could be split out from under C.l. familairis at any time as its own species should evidence indicate that it should not fall under C.l.f., if only we knew what it was. Linnaeus in his Systema Naturae (1758) described it as "pilo crifto longo, inftar ovis" - long feathery hair, like a sheep. That is all we know about it, and to start attributing it to water dogs or poodles based on that evidence is not supported. (Your reference above in not Linnaeus 1758, it is Gmelin 1792 translated from the German into English by Kerr "with additions".) It should simply be deleted; as an article it has only one original mention and can go nowhere. William Harris talk 13:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Greek Olympics. -- BDD ( talk) 20:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• The greek olympics → Olympic Games  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Recommend retarget to Ancient Olympic Games; this redirect was once an article, the former text of which is still on the page. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Just do it. There's no need to get our permission to retarget something unless obviously controversial or you're unsure. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 20:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • I think it's fair to bring it up here; there were the 1896 and 2004 Summer Olympics as well. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
    • Then would it be worth discussing Greek Olympics, etc.? -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 00:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate Greek Olympics.— Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 16:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Naddruf: if you want to turn Greek Olympics into a disambiguation page then you'll need to list it at RfD separately. If you want the The greek olympics to target Greek Olympics then that's "Retarget". Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply
    • @ Shhhnotsoloud: It would be completely useless to make this into a double redirect. I don't see why it's an issue that Greek Olympics and The greek olympics should target the same thing. Unless we follow your suggestion to delete The greek olympics.— Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 18:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply
      • @ Naddruf: My point was that your !vote "disambiguate" was unclear. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC) reply
        • Retarget The greek olympics to Greek Olympics.— Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 14:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Badly capitalised and unnecessary article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per the above. "Greek Olympics" without context almost always refers to the Ancient Olympic Games. The modern games are referred to geographically by city; if you wanted to talk about the 1896 or 2004 Olympics, you'd say Athens Olympics. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Greek Olympics, now a dab page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
  • The Ancient Olympics are the primary topic though, so it should be moved to Greek Olympics (disambiguation). -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 15:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
    • I looked at the mentions of "Greek Olympics" in books nominally between 2006 and 2008, and references to the Ancient Olympics are usually "Ancient Greek Olympics". "Greek Olympics" on its own is more likely to refer to the 2004 Olympics (or a small scale competition in a college, but these books are mis-dated). It's a small sample size, but makes your assertion less convincing. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 12:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC). reply
      
• Retarget to Greek Olympics. If and when Greek Olympics becomes a redirect, bypass the double redirect as usual. If people want to change Greek Olympics to not be a dab page, they can do that in a separate discussion, since RfD is not the correct forum for doing that. This redirect should follow the outcome of that discussion, whatever it is. -- N Y Kevin 21:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Has fun → Fun  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Weird phrasing, not likely. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep as a fairly common phrase, though less common as a search term. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Weak delete. It's not massively implausible, and it's definitely harmless, but it still seems kind of unlikely and pointless. It's not even getting much use, not even quite managing to average a single view a month. Thegreatluigi ( talk) 23:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep harmless. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
• Delete. Clutter. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 18:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Human history#Rise of civilization. WP:XY does not apply to the phrase "Dawn of civilization". _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Dawn of civilization → Civilization  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

A better target is probably Human history#Rise of civilization. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• The phrase in question can refer to other things as well. Ancient history is another possible target. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:XY, and as an unencyclopedic poetic expression WP:NOTDICT. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:XY ParticipantObserver ( talk) 14:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Human history#Rise of civilization per nom. I fail to see that this is not the only topic of the Google search results. Ancient History includes the rise of civilization, but also discusses topics from several millenia later. Also, as Human history shows, civilization before writing is not considered ancient history but rather prehistory.— Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 23:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Modern historian → Human history#Modern history  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Maybe Historian is a better target, or it should just be deleted. The current target makes little sense either way. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Perhaps weak retarget to Category:Historians by century so the reader can choose where to go from there? Annoyingly enough, there's Category:Pre-modern historians but no Category:Modern historians. —  J947 ^[cont] 22:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  @ J947: Please avoid WP:XNR. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  XNRs are only really a problem if of the namespaces the redirect connects one is editor-facing and one is reader-facing. In this scenario, both sides are reader-facing. —  J947 ^[cont] 20:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Good target, which is also where modern history redirects. Narky Blert ( talk) 08:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to historian per nom. The target article does not really describe about the modern historians. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Megrelian Wikipedia. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Mingrelian Wikipedia → List of Wikipedias  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Retarget to Megrelian Wikipedia by User:GEO IS THE BEST. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Merge Megrelian Wikipedia into Mingrelian Wikipedia. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 07:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

  @ Dariada1234: Seems a bit silly to be !voting on your own nomination. Why not just update your original rationale instead? -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Megrelian Wikipedia as plausible misspelling. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 10:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of Georgia (country). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Gruzija → Georgia (country)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

What the "Gruzija" country in Croatian, delete per WP:FORRED. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:RFFL. Narky Blert ( talk) 12:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Names of Georgia (country) where it is not only mentioned but discussed. Choose your section wisely. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 12:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• გერმანია → Names of Germany  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Delete per WP:FORRED. Georgian language is not a relevant language in Germany. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:FORRED. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 11:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep mentioned in target page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
• Keep per Rich Farmbrough. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sock-puppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Samadashvili, Salome → Salome Samadashvili  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Malkova, Mia → Mia Malkova  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Implausible title styling. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment: User:ჯეო created these redirects and has not been nominated into RfD yet. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

I don't understand what this means. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 12:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Redirects like this are common and not implausible. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 12:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Wikipedias. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Wikipédia → French Wikipedia  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Retarget to List of Wikipedias, since "Wikipédia" could be easily refered to Portuguese Wikipedia, Hungarian Wikipedia, Slovak Wikipedia, etc. rather than French Wikipedia. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. -- Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 11:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• |Retarget pn All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sockpuppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Herero Wikipedia → List of Wikipedias  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Delete per WP:SNOW. Herero Wikipedia has been closed, emptied and locked per the precedents at meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Herero Wikipedia, but the original user pages still exist. hz.wikipedia.org gives a non-existing "Main Page" as opposed to a browser message that the URL is wrong; and the interlanguage prefix is still operational. User:Dariada1234 ( discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Aquatic animal. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Water animal → Animal  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose retarget to Aquatic animal, that page has more to do with the redirect. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. CMD ( talk) 03:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Aquatic animal per nom, that'll help readers find out about their intended subject easier, like Land animal redirects to Terrestrial animal. Regards, SONIC 678 04:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget pn All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
  
• @ TheAwesomeHwyh: You know you can boldly retarget redirects yourself, right? You don't need to come to RfD to propose to retarget (unless of course you're unsure or it's controversial, but I didn't see evidence of that here). -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 15:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Tavix: I know. I had nominated this redirect late at night where I am, so I didn't want to do anything like that in case I was wrong, due to being tired. TheAwesome Hwyh 15:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Visual acuity#Expression. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Perfect eye sight → Visual perception  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Propose retarget to Visual acuity; this redirect refers to perfect visual acuity. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• I agree: the redirect should point to visual acuity, rather than visual perception. Possibly it would be more helpful if the redirect would point specifically to Visual_acuity#"Normal"_visual_acuity ParticipantObserver ( talk) 14:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Maybe but if there were a section "Excellent", should it point there? All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC). reply
    
• Retarget to visual acuity#Expression. My first thought was, "this is the same thing as 20/20 vision" - and guess where that redirects. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.