This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 10, 2019.
Template:Holophoner Award
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 25#Template:Holophoner Award
Caña (Chilean slang)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 20#Caña (Chilean slang)
Tony Malloy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Not sure what to do about these redirects. They all point to the same disambiguation page. I couldn't find a suitable target for them, and I don't think it's useful to link to a page which disambiguates a different spelling from the one a user types in. Feedback on what to do with these redirects would be appreciated.
Wug·
a·po·des 21:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as unnecessary, as they should be taken care of by the see alsos at
Malloy and
Molloy which are just alternative spellings of the Irish name derived from "noble chief". --
Bejnar (
talk) 02:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Thai Empire
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate. It is clear that there is no primary topic, and thus it should be disambiguated. The existence of one disambiguation page was noted for a retarget, and another one was created during this RfD.
(non-admin closure)
ComplexRational (
talk) 22:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
This page originally targeted "Siam Empire", and about two months later a bot fixed a double redirect to
Thailand. I'm not sure that Thai Empire should be targeting Thailand. Since Thailand's borders have been stable for a while now, they don't have any colonies or exclaves, and their monarch is formally a king (not an emperor), searchers will be probably not be looking for modern Thailand. I am not sure where it should go, however. —
Mr. Guye (
talk) (
contribs) 23:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
Siam Empire really should also be discussed here, since there has been no clear consensus on the preferred target. I've tagged it and added it to the discussion. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 05:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Disambiguate between the four historical kingdoms:
Sukhothai Kingdom,
Ayutthaya Kingdom,
Thonburi Kingdom and
Rattanakosin Kingdom. Of course, none of them were strictly speaking "empires", but, as I understand it, they did have systems of tributary/vassal states and borders that changed through conquest. —
PointlessUsername (
talk) 06:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: A disambiguation page already exists at
Siam (disambiguation).
Siam Empire should probably point there. But redirecting
Thai Empire there would be a
WP:SURPRISE. It could also refer to the
Phibun-era idea of a unified Thai state, referred to as มหาอาณาจักรไทย and translated as Great Thai Empire, Greater Thai Kingdom, Greater Thai State, among others. This is described at
Pan-Thaiism (though the name isn't mentioned there) and also
Thailand in World War II. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 14:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BDD (
talk) 19:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
TheSandDoctor
Talk 19:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
reply
Housekeeping.
CptViraj (
📧) 03:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BDD (
talk) 19:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The old filename is evidently a mistake.
Deryck
C. 16:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I don't think this redirect is harmless due to the extension reduplication, which may create issues in some contexts trying to make the file a .jpg of a .jpg. --
Tavix (
talk) 17:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:WhyArentThesePagesCopyedited
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 2#Wikipedia:WhyArentThesePagesCopyedited
Z (record label)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. PC78's comments put me on the fence, and I had been hoping for more comments, but given the amount of time that has passed without further input I'm okay with closing this as keep.
(non-admin closure) signed,
Rosguill
talk 15:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the target. Previously created as an unsourced article about a record label supposedly founded by Zendaya, it would appear that Zendaya has spent her career signed to
Hollywood Records and
Republic Records.
Zendaya discography doesn't suggest that she has an independent label either. signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The article refered to a collaboration with Labrinth and a soundtrack album. The
Amazon listing for the song says
℗ 2019 Simco Limited and Z, under exclusive license to Hollywood Records/Republic Records
, so it looks legit but it's not the easiest thing to Google.
PC78 (
talk) 00:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yuri Tambovtsev
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at the target, appears to be a non-notable professor who works or worked at Novosibirsk State University. Was converted from article to redirect on
G5 grounds by
Krakkos as the article was created by a sock and received nothing but minor copy edits from other editors. I think it would have been better to just actually delete with a G5, as there's nothing that a reader would learn from the redirection, and we don't have a convention for redirecting non-notable professors to universities the way we do for albums and musicians. signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Inglés
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Ingles (disambiguation).
(non-admin closure)
feminist (
talk) 03:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Spanish translation of English, delete per
WP:FORRED. —Yours sincerely,
Soumyabrata (
talk •
subpages) 14:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:F&D
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners.
Magioladitis (
talk) 07:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template talk:ChristianityWikiProject/sandbox
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29#Template talk:ChristianityWikiProject/sandbox
Template:Christ
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners.
Magioladitis (
talk) 07:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Animation Project
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29#Template:Animation Project
Template:AnimationProject
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29#Template:AnimationProject
Template:GTP
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners.
Magioladitis (
talk) 07:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:GTA TF Announcements
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unnecessary now
Magioladitis (
talk) 07:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:MaMTalk
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners.
Magioladitis (
talk) 07:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- I support removing this obsolete template. I created it when it was needed, and supported making it a redirect (and fixed its destination) when the original project it pointed to went defunct. -
UtherSRG
(talk) 22:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.