From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 7, 2019.

Sir winston hcurchill

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Unlikely misspelling. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fruity Loops Mobile

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus was established that the name exists and is a plausible search term. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational ( talk) 22:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Name doesn't exist. Eurohunter ( talk) 21:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Финальная Фантазия: Легенда кристаллов

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Violates WP:FORRED. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 20:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All-Atomic Comics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at target. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 19:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. Unless I'm missing something there was no such section in that article when the redirect was created, it was merely referenced in an image caption. The only other reference I can find is another image caption at Peak uranium, but I don't think that justifies a redirect. PC78 ( talk) 10:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C6H14N2O4Pt

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

C6H14N2O4Pt was created by mistake: formula of Carboplatin is …H12… not …H14…. There is no molecule in enWiki (more exactly: in my list of 15282 formulas extracted from chemical infoboxes of enWiki) with formula C6H14N2O4Pt2. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu ( talk) 18:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strippergate (Israel)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Sources provided justifying the redirect, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 01:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The consensus at a previous AfD was that this should be deleted, not redirected to Yair Netanyahu. Converting to a redirect was explicitly suggested by a participant in that discussion but it did not win consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New Orleans Eagles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Sources were provided to justify the redirect and no delete votes remain standing, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 20:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The team doesn't ever appear to have been based in New Orleans, nor was I able to find any evidence that this was otherwise used as a nickname for the team. signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

National Religious Affairs Administration

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 16#National Religious Affairs Administration

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

This would appear to be the Chinese character for a telegraph line feed. It should not redirect to X. signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Module:Synthlisten

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Unused module for deprecated (merged) template without any meaningful content (just an import). ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 12:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

off-topic discussion about venue
  • @ Ebe123: Wrong venue Should be at RfD, as modules that do nothing but import another module are functionally redirects. * Pppery * ... ... ... 13:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
    • Twinkle did not like my attempt :) RFD is much more focused on proper WM redirects, and not pages that act as one. As it is still a Module, I found this to be the better venue. ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 13:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
      • @ Ebe123: Template redirects go to RfD, therefore module redirects like this one should also go to RfD. The fact that Twinkle doesn't understand this is indicative only of a bug in Twinkle; there are very few users working to clean up the module namespace, so bugs can go unnoticed. * Pppery * ... ... ... 13:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
        • Be bold then! I don't much care where the discussion happens; just that it does, and this seemed suitable. Also, aren't template redirects just wikitext redirects in the Template namespace? That is the substance of my last comment (without response), showing that even as this is functionally a redirect, it is not a redirect in the WP sense of the word. ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 13:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
        @ Pppery: Also, no need to ping me for each reply; I'll get to them :) ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 13:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Calling All My Lovelies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational ( talk) 21:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Delation as it contains contain nontrivial edit history, being reasonably old, never released as a single or got promotion as such, not notable or used in other pages across wikipedia. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 09:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
My bad. Shouldn’t have done it. Self closure keep. (Oh, and I didn’t look at the previous discussion. Major screw-up.) (non-admin closure) Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 13:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Here we go again. Another semi-useless and kinda long redirect. Unneeded humour. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 08:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. When Oshawott says Here we go again, I assume that to be an admission that, yeah, this could be seen as trolling, but what the hell. These things have already been argued to bits, and it was clearly established that redirects that did not name individuals are less than problematic. Making no comment on the necessity or otherwise for a humor police. —— SerialNumber 54129 08:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep For goodness’ sake. Since when do we delete things for being “semi-useless”? Triptothecottage ( talk) 11:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ Serial Number 54129: I assume it was not your intention to remove the notification at WT:FRAM of this RFD. Triptothecottage ( talk) 11:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ Triptothecottage: of course not, but thanks for pointing it out to me: now reversed. Cheers, —— SerialNumber 54129 11:55, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, of course. No valid reason for deletion given, and this nomination appears somewhat pointy to me. In addition humour is sorely needed. -- bonadea contributions talk 12:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - "Here we go again" - Indeed, Here we go again wasting our lives on trying to make this a much humourless project as possible. I'm sure your time could be better spent on 1 of the 5 million articles we have, Obvious keep. – Davey2010 Talk 12:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

David Lieberman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ ( talk) 13:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Redirects to a disambig page that doesn't mention "David Lieberman". I have never seen this type of redirect before on Wikipedia and can't see the use. Should be deleted. Zerach ( talk) 06:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.