The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 04:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Episodes from Ed, Edd n Eddy, Special episodes → List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes#Special episodes  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Really implausible redirect. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 08:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete as implausible Department of Redundancy Department. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete as unlikely search term. Rubbish computer ( Talk: Contribs) 21:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Deletes per Special deletes. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Is Special deletes in reference to something? ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 22:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
    • It's just word play on "Episodes per special Episodes", sort of WP:PTM-ing the nominated redirect. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep Cheap to keep, and while the previous content may not 100% be needed for attribution, it doesn't really hurt to keep it. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 22:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep as harmless and per WP:MAD. The content was merged in this diff and I would say some of that content still exists at the target in some form, so the redirect is important for attribution. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 20:57, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• @ Tavix: The edit history doesn't need to stay at this title though. It could move to a title such as Ed, Edd n Eddy special episodes. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• On the other hand, the edit history doesn't need to be moved. I'd be fine with that as a compromise though. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 22:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Einstein, Newton, and Autism → Autism  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The history of this redirect is an essay that lays out a case for why Einstein and Newton may have had Autism. However, all these years later, there is no mention of Einstein and Newton at the current target. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete as out of date retarget. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete there is no suitable redirect target in the Autism article, and it is an extremely unlikely search term too. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 15:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to VFD. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 09:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• V.F.D. → A Series of Unfortunate Events  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Retarget to VFD: Current target resulted from the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.F.D., but I think it's rather odd that we have two essentially identical titles going to different places. In 2015, someone agreed with me and did the retarget, but it was quickly reverted. Bringing to RfD to establish consensus on the correct target. N Y Kevin 02:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Slashme and Midas02: Pinging the editors who retargeted and reverted. -- N Y Kevin 02:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Retarget to VFD (disambiguation page) VFD can have many meanings such as vacuum fluorescent display, Virtual Floppy Disk, etc. and not just the various meanings of VFD in ASOUE (Volunteer Fire Department, Very Fancy Doilies, Volunteers Fighting Diseases, etc.) -- Atomicdragon136 ( talk) 21:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to VFD (disambiguation) as above. Many acronyms can use the periods in-between. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 06:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to VFD (which I think is what @ AngusWOOF: meant). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to VFD - it's very plausible that people looking for one of the many meanings of VFD will land here, and it's unlikely that most of them want to know about ASOUE. -- Slashme ( talk) 06:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.